TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PreviousAcquisition Archive

View 0 posts and 24 comments by PreviousAcquisition on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

4 The protected characteristics The following characteristics are protected characteristics— age; disability; gender reassignment; marriage and civil partnership; pregnancy and maternity; race; religion or belief; sex; sexual orientation. 26 Harassment (1) A person (A) harasses another (B) if— (a) A engages in unwanted conduct related to a relevant protected characteristic, and (b) the conduct has the purpose or effect of— (i) violating B's dignity, or (ii) creating an intimidating, hostile, deg…
/r/MensRights23/03/16 05:36 AM
24

The girl accused him of rape. The felony charge for luring a minor over the internet was just thrown in there.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 04:19 PM
-3

We've been back for some time now. www.voat.co/v/fatpeoplehate
/r/MensRights10/07/15 05:46 AM
3

Tumblr feminists are mostly teenagers in their own echo chamber. I hardly think seeing one's post be dismissed as crazy as being worth posting to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 05:24 PM
18

Your source claims to use feminist theory as research methodology. It claims that free trade and globalization contributes to sex trafficking, that the Scandinavian model of criminalizing purchasing but not selling sex is the only model not conducive to sex trafficking, and that soft core pornography "presents false ideas about male entitlement to use, even victimize, the female body." It also refers to feminism 13 times, heteropatriarchy 8 times, hypermasculinity 6 times, and patriarchy 10 time…
/r/MensRights02/04/15 03:43 AM
31

Isn't it more sanitary for a man to be circumsized? Not at all. Nothing dirty about having a foreskin, or anything that it entails. It actually "self-cleans," similar to women's parts.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 11:37 PM
2

Naming the accused wouldn't be so bad if it didn't irreparably harm reputation and social standing. Innocent until proven guilty is not how most people think when they hear "So-and-so raped so-and-so."
/r/MensRights03/01/15 08:00 AM
1

Good. Even better.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 12:05 AM
3

Cutting off a part is better than cutting off all of it, although I disagree that either should be done at all.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 07:19 PM
16

American doctors are circumcision happy. There are several options to pursue before having yourself mutilated. Even a partial cut, or cutting off only the part of the foreskin with phimosis, should be the last resort, not a full blown prepucectomy.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 06:39 PM
7

I think like abortion your going to have men on either side of the debate. Abortion isn't a clear cut issue, as is the case with most issues of ethics and morality. Is circumcision a men's rights issue? Studies have shown that the foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis. It's removed mainly for cultural reasons, although it's under the guise of "medical" reasons. It is as much an issue to men's rights as FGM is to women's rights, and is highly analogous. In my opinion, male genital muti…
/r/MensRights31/12/14 06:22 PM
13

Thankfully, the vast majority of "medically necessary" circumcisions are, in fact, unnecessary. Babies are diagnosed with phimosis. Actual phimosis cases, that can be treated with simple stretching, are "treated" in the U.S. with MGM.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 06:14 PM
6

If it were satire, the uploader would absolutely allow comments. From the video description: Consent isn't just a necessary part of not being a creep, it can also be sexy, dirty, hot, and just straight up fun. See how this couple get it on and get off while asking for consent.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 12:03 AM
6

Would you mind giving a link to "the Duke List" for us all to check out? I can't seem to find it either.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 01:03 AM
6

Not health issues, but it does remove the most sensitive parts of your penis.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 12:26 PM
12

From the penile cancer wiki: The lifetime risk has been estimated as 1 in 1,437 in the United States and 1 in 1,694 in Denmark. The risk is higher in the US, where the circumcision rate is >50%, than in Denmark, which has very low circumcision rates. We treat UTIs with antibiotics, not surgery.(Intact men still have much lower risk of UTIs than women, by the way) i would think prevention would be better than treatment, I've never had a UTI Prevention isn't important when they're uncommon in men,…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 11:58 AM
5

Cut guy here- I think most of us are. threads like this make me feel really bad about myself. Learning that circumcision is incredibly damaging can be a hard pill to swallow, considering that you had no control over having it done to you. The point of all of this is that circumcision isn't generally a good thing, and it shouldn't be forced on children or infants.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 11:51 AM
19

A decreased risk of urinary tract infections. We treat UTIs with antibiotics, not surgery.(Intact men still have much lower risk of UTIs than women, by the way) A reduced risk of sexually transmitted diseases in men. Condoms > Circumcision, and circumcised men dislike condoms much more than intact men, and are less likely to use them. Protection against penile cancer and a reduced risk of cervical cancer in female sex partners. Penile cancer is a very rare form of cancer(1 in 1,000,000-ish), so …
/r/MensRights04/08/14 11:26 AM
2

Why deal with the treatment of something when you can deal in prevention? Condoms are good for prevention. Circumcision is an outright degradation of sex, and is mutilation in every sense. it's just cutting off some loose skin tissue that doesn't even serve much of a purpose anymore with modern humans. Loose skin tissue, like the labia, clitoris, foreskin, etc. Not necessary. Don't serve much of a purpose. Foreskin serves the purpose of protecting the glans, in addition to having the most sensit…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 11:08 PM
1

No, men can be raped, but only by other men, as only men can be rapists.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:07 AM
2

Alright, well, you have your mind set on this, as I do. Hopefully we can agree that regardless, it is unethical to perform circumcision on any human being without their consent.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 01:23 AM
2

It is necessary to prevent keratinization of the glans. The eyelid to foreskin analogy is good, as they both have similar functions in regard to the function they serve.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 12:54 AM
1

Except the majority of nerve endings are removed during circumcision. Also, clothes rub against the penis all day long. The foreskin is intended to protect the glands the same way your eyelid is intended to protect your eye. More on the differences.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 11:01 PM
7

They can remove their profile from it: http://chicklopedia.com/girls
/r/MensRights06/02/14 12:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter