TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Pristine-Book884 Archive

View 0 posts and 262 comments by Pristine-Book884 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

Or because they lack awareness and perspective, and they complain about trivial nonsense that doesn’t actually hurt them that much
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 10:48 AM
2

So if you confirm that leading, the conversation is a turn off then does that imply that men do indeed lead the conversation or are supposed to?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 03:56 AM
0

No, it is not because logic without proof isn’t really logic at all. It’s just emotional thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 05:06 PM
–

I’m not sure I do know that what do you mean? Do you have any proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 05:06 PM
1

So I actually read the article. Firstly, your whole assumption is that online communities are affecting how people behave and it keeps them miserable. But, that only applies for the individuals who are frequenting those spaces and, that is a very small amount of men so right away your conclusions are really only effective for a small amount of people assuming that the article that’s substantiating it is reliable. Secondly, the article has a total of 11 participants and it’s self reporting of ind…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 04:34 PM
–

Literally, how is it an argument? It’s not an argument at all it’s just your unsupported opinion You shouldn’t have even posted it. You can’t go through life thinking that you’re right without proof that’s just self elevating yourself above reality and constraints. That’s an ego problem
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 04:27 PM
1

You can’t just assume that a few random posts you read online apply to other people at large. You are assuming without evidence. Everything you wrote can be dismissed.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 04:24 PM
1

I don’t really follow your logic. Do you think that I need a counter argument to factually state that someone else else’s doesn’t have any evidence behind it? That does not make any sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 04:23 PM
1

You’re extrapolating individual stories which may not be truthful, and which comes from only a few individuals onto whole populations of other people. You’re being prescriptive and presumptuous. You’re making generalization without proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 04:15 PM
–

You’re extrapolating individual stories which may not be truthful, and which comes from only a few individuals onto whole populations of other people. You’re being prescriptive and presumptuous. You’re making generalization without proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 04:15 PM
1

😒
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 04:14 PM
–

Why should we trust your cultural read?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 04:13 PM
–

That might be true, or it might not be, but it’s not related to what I was saying-which is that people who are jaded don’t cause their being left wanting. OP suggests that it’s the case and I pointed out that this explanation when applied to large swaths of young men is trivializing all their issues, and is attributing systemic pain to a simple issue without proof and is presumption.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 04:13 PM
0

All your comments don’t have sources at least as of now. Your opinion does not matter because you are not an expert nobody’s opinions matter, unless they are expert or are backed up by evidence and reasoning. Just musing without evidence is not proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 04:09 PM
–

So? What is your point? Has nothing to do with my initial comment. Which is to suggest that attributing everyone being lonely because they are grumpy is reductive. What you brought up is irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 04:01 PM
–

Why would you agree with him? He literally didn’t give any proof. You should actually try thinking independently.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 03:58 PM
–

Where is the proof for your statement that most of their issue is externally inflicted on them by what you think is the RP community or whatever other website? This is a pretty significant claim you’re making.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 03:57 PM
–

The source is your own comment which is made without any citations and just your own opinions
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 03:55 PM
–

You’re explaining how you think conversations work and you’re making assumptions without proof. Why should anyone trust you?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 03:40 PM
–

I looked through your comment and I didn’t see any links or citations so everything you thought of can be dismissed out of hand as just conjecture.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 03:38 PM
–

Every thought you had that makes a claim should be backed up by proof. Otherwise, you’re just making assumptions and playing pretend and extrapolating onto untold millions or billions of people. Your own thoughts are not worth that much. You need proof for anything that you’re just thinking of. If you can’t prove anything that you’re typing then you shouldn’t type it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 03:34 PM
–

All the assumptions you made are just your speculation. There is nothing you’re saying that is verifiable. Lastly, the assumption you’re making that if only these people or whoever weren’t unhappy, they would then be happy-is flattening and reductive, and it rests on assumptions you are making about them. Meaning you lack proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 03:30 PM
–

Implication, even if you’re limiting it to just some people which is that if only they were happier, they wouldn’t be unhappy, is a little insulting and reductive. It’s basically invalidating their issues and suggesting that everything that is wrong with them is something they are missing in themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 03:29 PM
–

Where is the proof for anything that you wrote?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 02:56 PM
–

So your implication is that 60+ percent of men under 30 are single in the US-because all that 60+ percent is grumpy?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 02:56 PM
2

Are you sure you’re not turned on by something? A lot of people in general are not aware of what makes them tick subconsciously and people on Reddit even more so lack any self-awareness so I don’t know perhaps you should reconsider
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 05:33 AM
1

You can’t just extrapolate a random video you found on social media as proof for people in real life or at large.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 03:50 PM
2

A random YouTube video is not proof you can find any little video showing anything you want. It’s not evidence unless it comes from a reliable source. People think they’re entitled to their own opinions on how reality works.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 03:30 PM
2

Literally everything you said has no proof and so should be ignored until you find proof. Your whole post is a whole lot of nothing because there’s nothing substantiating it. All you’re doing is just misleading people with your own opinions instead of evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 02:25 PM
–

Where’s the proof that this matters and is the explanation for anything you are claiming?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 09:26 PM
3

So where is the proof? A random study about autistic kids is not really something you can extrapolate to men and women adults in general. The counter subtexts you might want to consider is that the reason why women have it easier is not because they are better, but because society goes easier on them expects less of them provides more first without anything given, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 11:19 AM
2

Where is the proof that all women are more likely to socialize care more about non-sexual bonding, be more agreeable, vs men? Something you notably edited away? As a function of what? Where’s the reasoning? And where’s the proof of what you’re suggesting-that men are lonely because they complain? That only holds if they are complaining to the same people they’re trying to get with socially, and that’s not necessarily true-you’re assuming that because they complain on places like Reddit they’re d…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 11:10 AM
9

You should also say that by the way, these only affects men because women can have all these things, and it won’t matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 05:55 AM
–

Proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 11:38 AM
10

Reddit is not real life Edit: people behave differently online than in real life so it’s not really what they think and even if it is really what they think you can’t extrapolate what a few people are telling you online to entire groups of people, millions, billions, total off the app, in the real world in your communities.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 11:13 PM
1

So you agree with me?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 11:24 PM
1

You know it’s not a virtue though when it’s an externality that is encouraging people to think this way against their free will. It’s a thought they didn’t intend to have and it’s changing society’s demographics against people’s awareness and free will. Even if it’s empowering for you right now, the downstream effects such as an aging population without a young tax base underneath are going to have problems for everyone-and the fact this all just comes from social media and smart phones, changin…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 01:02 AM
1

🫶
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 01:01 AM
0

It does indeed show that most women are in relationships or believe they are and most men aren’t-for people under 30. This proof is that women are increasingly judgmental and selective, which does answer your question
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 11:53 PM
1

It shows a general trend that represents a disparity between men and women of a certain generation-those influenced by smartphones and online dating-under 30 as the website says. So, yes, basically. It aligns with that specific idea and makes it plausible. Subtext is women and men do not live the same lives-women are passive judges and served-men need to earn and work and it can be grueling or obstinate. Completely different performances.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 10:31 PM
0

I have seen no such replies in my feed. My answer would be that because Pew confirms that there’s a discrepancy-and because women have the power of discretion-they either lack self-awareness and critical thinking and thus aren’t reliable self-reporters, or that they’re the exception.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 10:10 PM
0

Where is the proof that any statement you said is actually real?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 09:27 PM
1

Your activities that you did 15 or 20 years ago, do not apply to the current norms
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 09:26 PM
0

It shows that there is a discrepancy in general that has grown recently
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 09:25 PM
-1

Where is the proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 09:24 PM
1

Insufferable to you. What do you offer that makes you attractive? Stunning intellect?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 09:23 PM
–

So then I’m correct
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 09:18 AM
-3

It says that for the first time there is a great gender discrepancy, and who is single and who isn’t. You can infer from there that marriage is down. Or expect it to be as time goes on. I am correct you are still wrong. It goes beyond just income for all relationships in general. You are still incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 06:18 AM
-2

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/02/08/for-valentines-day-5-facts-about-single-americans/ Your lack of awareness is suggesting a lack of empathy
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 05:44 AM
-4

Yes bro Pew says so
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 05:19 AM
1

The Pew poll shows that for the first time in history-and only in the U.S. and comparable nations not worldwide-meaning there’s a specific externality causing this-more than 60% of young men are single and only 30% of said women are. This is proof that life has changed a lot in the past 5 to 10 years. People are not the same as they were when you were young because times are different-it is likely due to the rise and proliferation of smartphones, social media and online dating gamifying US women…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 04:53 AM
1

Your advice is worse than nothing because it’s misinformation based on old rules that no longer apply
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 04:48 AM
2

The Pew poll I referenced is the proof that unlike in the past, men and women do not have equal opportunity. And therefore advice from women who have it easier and lack awareness should be called out. It’s a check on perspective
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 04:30 AM
–

You have poor critical thinking skills. This is proof that your era has passed into a new era, that makes your own perspective obsolete and irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 04:05 AM
1

33 is not old I’m 30. But if you were doing stuff a while ago, like you were, then your perspective is old
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 03:42 AM
-1

People have indeed changed. More than 60% of men under 30 are single and only 30% of women are. That is proof of an externality changing young people that has never happened before-and it’s most likely the smartphone and online dating proliferating. So you are incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 03:39 AM
-2

Stuff you did when you were young does not apply to young people today because people have changed and therefore your advice is outdated
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 03:29 AM
-1

So if you did dating 10 years ago, you’re no longer relevant, the advice you have to give literally does not apply anymore because the culture has changed a lot in 10 years. For brevity, you could say that’s because you are old.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 03:28 AM
-3

Because if you did it a long time ago or even more than five years ago, the same rules don’t necessarily apply because people have changed post COVID-19
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 03:27 AM
-7

Because if you’re old, you’re not likely to be still dating or if you dated in the past the same regime rules don’t apply
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 03:12 AM
-3

And how old are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 03:11 AM
-4

Something that applies to current people, not people of the past. I’d say around 30 or younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 03:06 AM
-3

Literally, what year was this?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 02:40 AM
-15

So you’re old? And you’re not of the current generation of men and women? So your answer doesn’t matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 02:39 AM
-7

How old are you-when did it happen? This is a question for women of age.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 02:39 AM
3

Where is the proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 07:57 PM
1

Where is the proof for the statements you made?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 10:17 AM
1

Firstly, your evidence does not state that women like casual sex less than men. At least it doesn’t say it in any useful term, such as how many women versus how many men, and to what degree. Or what variance within women versus men. So you see that you have never made a coherent argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 11:19 AM
1

Let me put it this way you’ve proved a few isolated independent points about porn use and the orgasm gap or whatever but how does it connect back to your main point and where do you go from here?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 02:29 AM
1

I have no idea what your main point even is or what we even disagree about. You have poor, logical organizational skills and poor critical thinking skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 12:07 AM
1

Now in your own words, you need to explain why these points matter and what argument they support. Because right now they’re non-sequiturs.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 09:32 PM
1

Where’s the proof and how’s it relate to your main point?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 02:52 AM
1

Where’s the proof for your claims and how do they support your main point?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 02:52 AM
1

So in your own words, what do you think this gap proves? How does it support your argument?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 02:25 AM
1

I can’t just take your word for it. You need to actually provide proof. Otherwise you’re just asking me to trust you on faith. You see the issue with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 02:24 AM
1

Where’s the proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 02:17 AM
1

Your conjectural musings are not evidence. Evidence needs to be something you can point to and show others.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 02:16 AM
1

Then where is the proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 02:00 AM
1

See now there’s another point. Some of the stuff you’re saying might be true like an orgasm gap or whatever but even if that’s true that doesn’t prove your earlier point. The idea of arguing is not to prove non sequiturs true it’s to make a coherent argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 09:44 PM
1

Where is the proof that you are correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 09:36 PM
1

You have poor critical thinking skills and poor awareness for systems beyond your narrow life experiences. You assume that your intuition is proof for you, which is not a given and even more boldly you assume that your intuition is proof for others, if not for everyone else. What you think is true is not necessarily true. Not for you or for others that’s why you need proof. Your inability to give any and your lack of awareness to comprehend why this matters, suggests that you are not capable of …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 09:35 PM
1

Literally every claim you made, the entire paragraph, can be discarded as not true and made up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 08:20 PM
1

No proof-no argument. Nothing you said is valid without evidence to support it. It’s all just conjecture and not worth anything. I can invent or write anything I want if like you, I don’t need evidence, and then nothing would matter we’d be back and forth. You either need to find facts or admit that you’re wrong and that unsubstantiated opinions don’t matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 08:09 PM
1

Your experience is not evidence of anything. Because you do not provide proof. Secondly, there are a couple plausible explanations to reconcile this discrepancy. For example, most women do not want relationships-it’s more precise to say that most women want relationship relationships with the men they want to date which could be a small sliver.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 07:47 PM
-1

None of that stuff which is about prehumans is proof or relevant to this modern phenomenon caused by social media and tech. You have not proven anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 07:29 AM
-3

I could condition my statement to say something like “it’s never happened before in American history”, or contemporary history, or something like that, but I think you understand that bringing something obscure and ancient as evidence of precedence for a modern phenomenon, is disingenuous, don’t you? You’re conflating an anthropological issue with a contemporary cultural one. You have poor critical thinking skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 06:31 AM
5

Proof for your statement? You can look up Pew. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/02/08/for-valentines-day-5-facts-about-single-americans/ This has never happened before, only happens in the Developed/Western World like the phone brained US, and only affects younger generations who grew up with (as kids, teens or young adults) social media, online dating, smartphones. It can’t be just things as they’ve always been because things have frankly never been this way and they’re only manifes…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 05:51 AM
7

Your point might make sense if it were something beyond the past 10 years. But it’s really not. It’s only aa old as online dating, tech addiction, social media, and smartphones. Never before have there been generations of men that are single and women that aren’t, this is very clearly an artificial externality. It only affects young people and mostly in the U.S./Western World. It’s not natural behavior or a just society, but a poisoned one. Not fair to men who are human beings just like women an…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 09:54 PM
0

It literally says, though that 60+ percent of men under 30 years single and only 30% of women are which shows generational and gendered imbalance. It’s close to the Pareto Principle and is still correct. And if you consider the 60% of single men who are dating, then yes, it could be of that 60%, 20%:
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 04:29 AM
1

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/02/08/for-valentines-day-5-facts-about-single-americans/ It’s been discussed in multiple headlines like from CNN since then too. It’s a stark example of how things have changed since past generations and how men and women live unequal outcomes in unequal lives, women have much more easier social lives and graces.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 01:59 AM
1

It’s not made up lol it’s from PEW
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 11:51 PM
5

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/02/08/for-valentines-day-5-facts-about-single-americans/ “Even among adults who are “single and looking,” not everyone is interested in the same type of relationship. Roughly one-in-five single adults (22%) say they are open to either a committed relationship or casual dates, while 13% say they are only looking for a committed relationship and 7% are only looking for casual dates. In total, 42% of single Americans are looking for some kind of romance.…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 11:50 PM
1

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/02/08/for-valentines-day-5-facts-about-single-americans/ “Even among adults who are “single and looking,” not everyone is interested in the same type of relationship. Roughly one-in-five single adults (22%) say they are open to either a committed relationship or casual dates, while 13% say they are only looking for a committed relationship and 7% are only looking for casual dates. In total, 42% of single Americans are looking for some kind of romance.…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 07:55 PM
2

It’s still basically 2/3 of men, double that of women, never before seen in history of the U.S., let’s not be distracted from the salient issue here which is that this is not normal, just, or fair society. The externality is clearly present and caused by social media, online dating, and smartphones.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 07:50 PM
5

Where is the proof? If you look for a young men under 30 then yeah that is actually true according to Pew.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 11:52 AM
1

If I’m right that’s all that matters
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 04:20 PM
1

I do care about the truth but we agree so the rest doesn’t matter
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 08:20 AM
1

Who cares? You still agree with me don’t you?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 03:14 AM
0

But yes you’re correct I didn’t read what you wrote it’s Reddit does it really matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 09:08 PM
2

The point is there is no plausible argument you have to say that Serena Williams is the best tennis player or therefore to disagree with John McEnroe mentioned in the OP. So you therefore must logically agree with him when he says Serena Williams isn’t the best. And if you don’t-then you plausibly have an ulterior motive such as making some sort of gendered point in spite of the facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 09:07 PM
5

Best light weight boxer likewise doesn’t mean “best boxer”. Best women’s tennis player doesn’t mean “best tennis player”. You have literally just proved yourself wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:07 PM
10

The point is that it’s meaningless to say that Serena is the best in the world because she is objectively not the best compared to men. That validation equivalence argument does not make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:06 PM
9

Meh. But where is the meaning in saying Serena is the best, if she can’t beat the top men? That would mean she’s not the best. Seems like what you really want is validation and forced respect against facts. Which is by the way ego worship
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:04 PM
2

So then if I ask you for proof or evidence backing up how you can logically attribute blame-which is not a subjective opinion but a logical argument-can you provide any?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 04:49 PM
3

Nice so you just had a thought without any evidence or scientific reasoning and just on your healthy ego and value of self worth assumed any feeling you have is valid?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 04:45 PM
3

Where’s the proof? Did you just make it up?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 04:41 PM
1

So you have zero proof for your assumptions?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 03:53 PM
5

Where in that article does it prove your statement that in a single parent household, it’s not the rearing parent’s fault but the parent who’s absent’s fault?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 03:18 PM
6

“Certainly it’s not the fault of the parent who raised the kid who went on to be a criminal”. Prove this or reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 03:15 PM
3

I don’t get how it’s “clearly” the case can you explain?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 02:38 PM
1

Well sources are important otherwise we’re just playing pretend which you don’t realize.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 07:23 PM
1

Nowhere have you listed a source so you have no proof. That’s the proof for my claim that you have no proof for yours. You have poor critical thinking skills
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 07:18 PM
1

And what do you believe my point is? That I need to find proof for?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 07:12 PM
1

I would say you can’t make any argument at all about any topic without evidence and reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 06:54 PM
1

You don’t have proof or reasoning to provide so you’re just making it all up
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 06:41 PM
1

Then you’re just making stuff up and it’s not authoritative and you’re unreliable, anymore than I would be if I just made something up.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 02:39 PM
1

Proof from something that is credible and reliable like if you were writing an essay in college or high school that wouldn’t get failed for you making stuff up
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 02:27 PM
3

Proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 02:26 PM
1

Proof from a reliable credible source
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 02:25 PM
1

Your observation is not proof and if that’s all you have then you should be discredited
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 01:47 PM
1

Evidence would be something from a reliable source
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 01:33 PM
1

So you have no proof what you wrote is just your opinion that is completely unproven? The other word for that is a fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 01:09 PM
6

You just made it up and said it without proof you can’t just generalize without evidence. You’re just voicing conjecture.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 12:54 PM
1

Where is the proof for your statement? You’re just making things up online.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 12:45 PM
2

What are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 12:43 PM
4

And where is the proof for your statement?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 12:43 PM
3

Proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 10:40 AM
8

People including men want to love and be loved without being objectified for their money, or other assets.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 10:24 AM
–

You cannot say anything about me like that because you’d be wrong. Pew literally is proof that you’re incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 03:55 PM
–

You’re literally making things without proof. Pew says more than 60% of men under 30 are single and only 30% of women under 30 are. That’s proof you’re just making things up without evidence when you say “women and average men are dating all the time”.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 03:50 PM
–

Where is the proof that women date average men all the time? In 2025?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 02:41 PM
1

Nowhere does it say that this was by choice or voluntary. People saying “they’re not looking” is not a leap to “and they’re not unsatisfied or wholly voluntarily participating”, especially since, the evidence isn’t in isolation and we have a whole glut of evidence that young Americans, mostly men, are lonely. You have made assumptions without proof to (I suspect) attempt to validate an emotional argument that men and women are afforded equal opportunity or outcomes, or that women still have it w…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 11:51 AM
1

It’s not a personal attack. It’s a diagnosis of you and your argument and you are still incorrect. Pew does not explain or mitigate the gap or declare that it’s acceptable, normal, or pleasant as you are doing. You are assuming without evidence and extrapolating.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 09:38 AM
1

It’s not lol OK to be broke. It means you’re likely incorrect. You live a coddled life off the fruits of men and have poor critical thinking skills, or you don’t and you’re poor. Either of these is most likely true
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 02:43 AM
1

my last job is a project coordinator and investigator for biotech manufacturing, it paid me $70/hr on W-2 and my job was reviewing deviations, interviewing scientists and engineers about what went wrong and writing technical reports to withstand an audit. I’m aged 30 btw, and a man. If I I don’t understand documents that people submit to me, I send it back with my critiques for correction and revisions. So, it’s unlikely I’m misunderstanding anything on my own fault. I’m demonstrably more intell…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 01:05 AM
1

So you were extraneous from the very beginning? Or maybe organization is just poor. Either way, you did not make a valid argument, inserting extraneous info for no objective and without context is not effective persuasion.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 12:07 AM
1

Nothing you wrote contradicts the main point that I wrote. You have poor critical thinking skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 11:56 PM
–

So you agree with me? Because none of what you wrote actually contradicts what I’m saying
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 12:51 PM
1

Because your premise does not agree with this fact-it does not support your argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 12:50 PM
–

Because it’s not fair to objectify half the population this way and reduce them to another half’s ego toys? And this isn’t just preferences becuase this is unique to nations and generations who grew up with social media and online dating
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 12:47 PM
–

Yeah…kinda people should change their preferences. Not personally condition themselves but, we should recognize that a lot of these preferences are unhealthy, abnormal conditions borne from social media and online dating commodifying men for women’s validation.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 11:59 AM
–

Nobody has ever been able to date “whoever they want”, other party must be willing. If a majority of the other party has unhealthy and inconsiderate beauty standards then it can’t be helped. That’s the block.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 11:58 AM
1

Because the words you quoted, do not agree with the premise you stated. They literally do not match.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 09:02 AM
1

None of that is proof that validates what you’re saying
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 04:39 AM
1

So you agree that I’m correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 08:27 AM
1

Proof for your opinionated statement that you just made up? About men being stuck in the 1950’s?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 02:19 PM
–

So if you look at relationships purely framed as “how do these people serve me”, even if that might be true in some subconscious way, to articulate it consciously and endorse that is kinda narcissistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 02:18 PM
–

It seems like ego worship and validation-do you expect others to treat you this way, or to consciously categorize your friendship and love this way-“I like you because you are helpful to me”? Sounds narcissistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 09:28 AM
1

Yes, so what? I guess you agree with me? Women are wrong because they are manipulated by phones.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 08:20 AM
–

There’s a difference between seeking the good in people and using your newfound social media borne privileged to objectify others systematically. Your way of thinking seems benign, but this has never been the case in history before, it is actually objectifying and reductive
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 05:16 AM
–

Idk kinda, if one of the two genders excludes a majority of the other gender from romance based on attributes people only started caring about intensely since the rise of smartphones and online dating, you could say that’s un natural, and an interference that shouldn’t exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 05:14 AM
–

I’m still correct
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 05:13 AM
–

How is it obtuse or incel to make a point that some women, sometimes, profess things politely and deniably, and don’t want to own the same ideas said aloud? I didn’t speak cryptically just to be cute I did it to make them draw out the truth of their words themselves, not have me just accuse them, but themselves own their words. It’s purposeful and intelligent of me.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 02:11 AM
–

I think your repeated engagement with what you ostensibly call nonsense suggests that you know exactly what it means, and you’re just afraid or stung to confront it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 01:19 AM
–

You have a mental block that prevents you from reckoning with yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 01:16 AM
–

That’s a typical deflection to avoid accountability for your statements
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 01:14 AM
–

Whether you say it politely or impolitely it’s felt and understood. It doesn’t really matter. I’m actually me personally. I would think that if it were someone I didn’t like I wouldn’t really care, so I would rather you just be hostile. You know nothing of being a man
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 12:55 AM
–

How many of these things then all of them any of them?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 12:54 AM
1

I don’t know I was saying you only like people who bring value maybe that’s just a way to articulate things but it seems a little objectifying and reductive and self entitled. Like do I stop being friends with people if they don’t bring value? Doesn’t feel very mutually respectful
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 12:51 AM
–

How much do you make a year? What’s your opinion really worth?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 12:42 AM
1

Was it in real life or was it just online?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 12:14 AM
1

You cannot extrapolate what you see from a few posts online to people in general. That’s an assumption.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 10:02 PM
1

Not proof of people in general
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 08:42 PM
1

I am not wrong, I am demonstrably correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 08:42 PM
1

Does the article say that 39% are willingly not in a relationship? That it’s their choice? Or did you just assume that? Go back and look closer.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 08:15 PM
1

Personal observations are not proof and so can be discarded
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 08:14 PM
1

The US overall is more liberal because individual states can have very few restrictions and generous week limits some states can be very restrictive. European nations overall are not very permissive, the US, especially before Roe V. Wade was among the most pro abortion nations in existence. The point is your own judgments are not informed by facts but on emotions that do not conform to real reality. So therefore, everything you think is uninformed and suspect, and you lack discernment and indepe…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 08:14 PM
1

And how do you make that determination until you get to know the person? Possibly through dating? Which then brings us back to what the premise of OP is. So your advice, therefore is meaningless.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 07:30 PM
1

No, it’s not it’s what you’ve observed personally unless you can prove it with a source and data.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 07:29 PM
1

According to a quick look at Google AI Overview, Ireland has an abortion ban limit of 12 weeks, that is in line with several conservative anti-abortion states like North Carolina and Nebraska. And relatively close to the most harsh state states like Texas, which has a six week limit. So I am correct. You are wrong. What you cal oppression is not really oppressive compared to what people consider globally. It might be unjust or unfair, but, it’s not oppressive.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 07:28 PM
1

Personal anecdotes are not proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 07:26 PM
0

How can you be drawn to a specific habit like this? Your entire premise suggests that this type of behavior is apparent from the start and can be screened for. But this is a flawed assumption.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 01:20 PM
2

How are you supposed to screen for something particular like this? What you wrote doesn’t make sense
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 01:19 PM
1

I have done no such thing. Your direct quotes do not mean anything. I am waiting for you to outline an argument and you have not done so. Probably because you an argument and cannot connect your points into something coherent while also not making stuff up. The facts laid bare don’t support whatever you’re trying to articulate.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 01:14 PM
0

Your opinion is not proof
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 01:12 PM
0

Where is the proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:30 AM
1

Where is the proof for your statement?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:30 AM
1

Well, do you feel free or do you feel oppressed in the US? How about in France or Ireland? Countries that have tougher abortion laws than in the U.S.? Your argument is hysterical and made in bad faith
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:28 AM
1

40% aren’t looking proves what exactly? And what does that direct quote in your opinion prove for your argument? You haven’t explained anything. You’re just pulling things and not linking them
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:27 AM
1

The article supports your argument? Where? Show me the context and how it supports your argument. You’re likely misunderstanding what you’re reading or are extrapolating falsely.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 10:57 PM
1

firstly, women don’t have no bodily autonomy in the U.S., that’s a false paradigm that I hadn’t yet called you out on-but permitting it to stand does not let it be true-your characterization is still wrong. In the narrow field of abortion rights, women have some restrictions, but even in the restrictive states, it’s still accessible up to the First Trimester or so-even other Asian and European nations have similar restrictions as conservative states beyond the First Trimester. Not much different…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 10:56 PM
1

If you think you’d be treated better as a man, I would like you to explain why
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 06:57 PM
0

Where is the proof that this is the dominant narrative?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 06:57 PM
0

Depends how awkward. But even if you’re a little shy or introverted, generally people come to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 06:57 PM
1

You pretty much do have a bio clock if you have no good options when you get old just like women do
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 06:56 PM
1

Show me pls
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 06:51 PM
1

Am I wrong? How am I wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 06:51 PM
1

Depends for what? But for the perks of being treated as a woman, I probably would. The average attention that the woman gets would be intoxicating. Very useful. The equivalent of every woman pretty much being interested and warm to me without me trying as that’s kind of how it works for women to men, would make life so very easy and strategic.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 06:50 PM
1

Most women can because they don’t really have a lot to be ambitious for. They can just get fulfillment in life without trying-because validation and access to status is offered from others like starting a family. Because men do not care. The inverse is not true
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 06:47 PM
1

Sacrificing your youth just to maybe get a crack later when you’re old with someone way younger than you is not a victory
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 07:38 AM
1

Yeah, so if you are a man dating women in your age, and you are 40, then you also have because of your peers also lost the opportunity to be a healthy father
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 07:27 AM
1

They pretty much do it’s a function of the peer groups they would most likely be dating. So you could say that the woman’s biological clock is the man’s biological clock.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 06:42 AM
1

Where is the proof? And where is the proof that this is better or comparable to just doing it when you’re both young?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 06:15 AM
2

Where is the proof? Marrying later in life is also a disadvantage. My speculation is just nonsense fantasizing and fetishizing of age from a subset of women who read erotica and want to be spoiled with money.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 06:15 AM
-1

Men are way more likely to get murdered than women in the US so what does that mean exactly? It means your whole argument is bunk. You have not proven anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 06:13 AM
1

It’s no real benefit to be able to reproduce when you’re old. Nobody wants to just reproduce for the sake of it. They want a family. And you can’t have that if you’re old, even if you biologically can. Which means practically they have a biological clock just like women. Unless you’re OK with dating someone younger which a lot of people are not thinking as ideal.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 06:11 AM
1

They do have a bio clock because just like women they can get too old.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 04:45 AM
1

It’s not just a bummer. It’s losing your youth. It’s more severe than you’re making it out to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 12:06 AM
1

When everyone looks over you and doesn’t acknowledge you and your left wanting attention that you can’t get-you might understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 12:05 AM
2

According to Pew more than 60% of men under 30 are single but only 30% of women are. This is proof that there is an externality affecting women’s psychology and leaning to hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 12:04 AM
1

The benefits are way less overt than that. They are the little things that you may not be conscious of but you would miss if you stopped getting them. Ethan for people you think know you for who you are like your family and friends. And secondly what’s your relationship status? Most men under 30 according to you are single and most women aren’t so that’s a big benefit you have just by being a certain sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 12:03 AM
1

You make it sound so negative, but yes, most people like men and probably women crave intimacy and validation. What is your point? What pros of a man do you think men are holding onto? Do you have any examples?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 08:23 PM
1

How many partners in life have you had? If the answer is more than zero, then perhaps you should rethink your statement
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 08:21 PM
2

How do you know you’ve missed it? Do you think that if you were made a man, your life would not change? Do you think it would get better? Do you think people would be nicer to you? Do you think you would be getting more of what you wanted in life? If the answer to any of these questions is no, then you have admitted that your premises is wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 08:21 PM
0

I don’t think you believe your own words. I could ask you a question like how many partners have you had for example. And your answer would be telling. Or perhaps you’ve had none-depends how old you are. Maybe you really don’t care for intimacy at all-but if so, you’re probably lying and if you’re being honest, you are a small minority of humans. So you basically proved nothing especially absent of details about your life that I can scrutinize
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 08:20 PM
1

It’s a consolation that women don’t have true, but women can just do the right way much easier and without effort. They can sift through hundreds or thousands of men near them-and pick whoever they want or whenever they just feel like in the mood. It’s a great luxury to not worry about impressing people, but just to be accepted without even trying
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 08:18 PM
3

A woman can be very mediocre and basically get everything that she wants without working for it. A man cannot. Therefore, a man success is a product of how he works, and how smart he builds his life-and how he must navigate our engineer, social interactions-either actively or more generally just by building yourself up to make it smooth, but both require a lot of attention and active planning. Women don’t need to do this at all
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 08:17 PM
-4

The way women are disadvantage are generally minor or rare/not life defining. Women can go through life without worrying about fixing their problems-they can literally go through life working at a gas station or McDonald’s and still do everything that would make them happy like starting a family and having children, or just chilling with friends and partners, or parents. Men generally can’t do that or if they can it’s much less pleasant. The alternative therefore is to hustle and make your life.…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 08:15 PM
1

Humorous that you think women are treated inferior. Where is the proof? The average man, especially if they are middling, is treated with a lot less deference. Even bums in the gas station get hit on, get supported financially, can just host and start a family and do whatever they want without much active effort-such a man could probably not, at least not as passively.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 08:11 PM
1

Guarantee that if you were a man, your life would be much harder-a middling unambitious women gets afforded much more grace and elevation versus a comparable man. You just don’t realize it. But if you were made the average man you would.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 08:08 PM
0

I’m correcting what I think is wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 08:04 PM
2

Even the average women are attractive. Probably until you’re at least visibly old so in like your 50s or 60s-and unless you are severely inhibited like with a disability or you’re morbidly obese-even average women that you think are unattractive are pretty much still treated as attractive. They get the same sort of grace. Online dating pretty much confirms it, as well as the phenomenon called women are wonderful that you can read online. Women have a really wide acceptable range for looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 08:01 PM
0

Depends how you define respect. Lack of respect could be being ignored or it could be being infantilized. Maybe men get the former and maybe women get the latter more often on average. But you know how women sometimes complained about being invisible and how it can tear people up? That’s what most average men deal with in 2025. Cold isolation and sometimes even open scorn-not just romantically, but sometimes from your peers. I’m not sure most women would sign up for what the average man deals wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 07:57 PM
3

It’s all right to have whatever feelings you want, but is it really something fair to objectify people and stratify them based on unrealistic standards? That just doesn’t seem to be very mindful of people’s worth as humans. You’re validating them for reasons that are not who they are personally, but what they are super superficially. That’s like the exact same argument that women have been trying to make for decades. How are you gonna then subject men other human beings to the same things women …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 07:55 PM
1

The OP premise literally says unrealistic, and why do you think it should be virtuous to objectify and hold people to unrealistic standards for beauty or finance or whatever else? That is not how women wish to be treated. Isn’t that a big part of what feminism advocates for anyways-not being held to unrealistic beauty or other standards? Now you’re gonna say that men should be? That is hypocritical and does not treat people equally.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 07:53 PM
2

Do you think it would be a just fair society if all men got together and collectively said let’s just disparage and ignore all women who don’t conform to our ideal body standards? And it was something personal like I don’t know wait or breast size or something like that. And then they openly mocked you for it or at least politely discerned you for it? Because that’s literally the inverse of the premise that the OP posts
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 07:51 PM
1

It is not ideal
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 07:48 PM
1

If I wait to have kids until I’m 60, even if that’s biologically possible that’s still not really fulfilling so therefore just like women men also run out of time. Practically at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 07:47 PM
1

Where is the proof? And also, I don’t really think that you can genuinely say that if you’re old as a man and you are finding a woman younger than you like way younger young enough to have kids while you’re old, that this is like somehow just as good as just getting a relationship in your 20s or 30s with a woman around your age. You are being disingenuous to try to force the conclusion that men don’t have a biological clock and that’s not really true.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 09:49 AM
1

Where is the proof for your statement that they can have kids when they want and they can get with younger women? And that, even if they can, this is a satisfying thing to do versus having a more stable, healthy relationship with a woman, their age when both are young?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 09:41 AM
1

you really think that men are not pressured to get married or find a relationship before they get old? Do you want to retract that statement? Yes they are. Literally just think about what you just wrote.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 09:36 AM
4

If you think that having a kid when you’re 50 and 60 with a woman 20 or 30 years younger than you is winning or an advantage, then I’d like you to really think about that. It is absolutely not. It’s a consolation at best. It’s not comparable to doing it the right way, and having kids with a woman of your age and peer, while you’re both young. You can’t just use this as an example to say that men can have kids later. Because while they technically can, the experience is much more hollow and unsat…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 09:31 AM
7

You probably could not survive being a man. Being a man is not like being a woman people generally are very indifferent and cold to you so you pretty much need to earn every little bit of acknowledgment and respect on your own. The little graces that women get you just probably would not get as a man-unless you’re deliberately putting yourself together to earn them, but that takes a lot of work and tact that you may not be used to, and it may not be enough regardless socially, especially if you …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 09:30 AM
3

You really think that people are just really nice to men well, it’s not just in dating, but a lot of people can be kind of indifferent and unaccommodating to men versus women. You’re not really offered a lot of social grace. Women generally just get socially accommodated.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 09:28 AM
8

I wonder what you think your life as a man would be like. Especially in 2025. What do you think happens each day when you wake up? I think the only way you can really understand is if you immediately just had the world see you as a woman aged 50 to 60 and you never got treated as when you were young. You’d be permanently invisible and must accomplish everything on your own efforts, that’s pretty much what most men deal with.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 09:27 AM
5

You would immediately regret this decision. Everyone would just be indifferent and crass to you. You would get no social grace, most likely. You would have to work and fight for every little bit of courtesy and respect that you probably take for granted as a woman. The isolation and lack of warm regards is grating. Especially if you’re objectionable in someway-character flaws for men can be very debilitating, because people are unforgiving and do not compromise for your benefit. Women generally …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 09:25 AM
3

What kind of argument is this? Do you think men don’t have to worry about a biological clock? Only in the sense of that they can partner up and foster children when they’re old, but that’s not really the same thing as a healthy relationship with a woman their age. So really men have a biological clock too, even if it’s a function of their peers.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 09:22 AM
-10

How naïve. You would be trading small problems for much bigger ones and you probably couldn’t handle it. Imagine aging yourself immediately up to like 50 or 60. And never being seen as young. That’s about what most men get from society around them in the US. You wouldn’t be getting more respect, you would just be getting a couple niche trade-offs in public safety in exchange for being ignored everywhere else and needing to prove yourself for literally every little bit of respect outside your par…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 09:21 AM
1

How’s it a leap? The OP literally says it’s ok to set unrealistic standards to men. Holding people to unrealistic superficial standards is harmful, unfair shallow, not the way anyone would want to be seen and treated. The premise that “it’s ok” as OP says is not valid, if by ok we mean “moral, and equally treated”.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 09:21 PM
1

Subjecting half the population to unrealistic standards and objectifying people based on those standards, is not fair or virtuous. You wouldn’t want to be treated that way you wouldn’t want to see women treated that way. So why say it’s ok to see men treated that way-it’s a double standard and shows a lack of regard for people based on their gender being male.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 09:20 PM
0

So it looks like you don’t really view men as people if you’re saying that it’s OK to objectify them, body shame them, use them for money whatever, at scale. Just shows you view half the population not as equals but as nuisances or worse. If you’re not cool with men collectively judging, disparaging, and being shallow to women at scale, not sure how’d you rationalize being ok with this, while still claiming you want equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 07:51 PM
1

The proof is what I have provided, in laying out the gaps in your reasoning. You have been proven wrong and intellectually bested
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 12:41 AM
1

I have proven that your perspective isn’t valid by showing that you have no causal links between your orders of thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 09:59 PM
1

I have no perspective, I only aim to prove that your perspective is unsubstantiated, which it is. The idea that women initiate most divorces as proof for the other unrelated idea said earlier, that women are fed up with men not contributing in households and relationships, as further proof therefore, that most men are single because of that reason, is a chain of non-sequiturs, fallacious thinking, and assumptions. That’s the problem with your argument. Saying your argument is flawed is my entire…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 07:55 PM
1

You’re very confident, but you’re incorrect. I can prove to you why what you said makes no sense by tracing back this long thread. The OP says “both men and women are unhappy, maybe women are more unhappy” to paraphrase. Outside memory says “maybe they’re each single because they’ve experienced men not helping women in relationships” a statement made without proof. You bring up divorce rates being initiated by women. Divorce rates being initiated mostly by women is not proof of anything. It’s pl…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 07:23 PM
1

What you call your perspective is not related to the premise and so is not considered evidence. It has no direct relationship, you’re making a leap from what it says immediately into what it doesn’t say, but what do you think it does- you are extrapolating and lack the awareness to realize. You have poor critical thinking skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 07:07 PM
1

Your perspective is not proof. It’s just your opinion. Opinions are not proof and they don’t act as objective. Where is the proof you are correct? You’ve not provided any proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 06:46 PM
1

No, most likely you are using it incorrectly. There’s a difference between saying a theory is wrong and saying someone on Reddit claiming something is a theory, is wrong. I would ask ChatGPT if you’re using it incorrectly. Most likely since you are not an expert, you are using it incorrectly. More proof of the entitlement of your opinion, it’s arrogance and ego think that you cannot be wrong when you make opinionated statements. The study you gave is valid as a study, but it is irrelevant and do…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 06:40 PM
1

I’m pretty sure what you wrote doesn’t actually make sense because some things are objectively true, or are objectively true according to the facts. For example, Pew says 60+ percent of men are single and only 30+ percent of women are, for under 30 in the US. That is an objective truth. Because it is backed up by evidence. What you wrote is just assumptions trying to explain something that isn’t correctly attributable. You used your own opinion and that was non-objective, non-factual, and emotio…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 06:33 PM
1

I have never made an opinion in this thread. I don’t deal with opinions I deal only with objective truths, and factual statements. You think your opinion matters, but nobody’s opinion matters. You have an entitled mindset. You have poor critical thinking skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 06:28 PM
1

I also am in grad school, and I will say that if this actually was your argument on an essay you would fail. You have not articulated anything if you want to try again do it here. But just bringing up random non-sequiturs and then making a conclusion is not an argument that supports your original premise.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 06:25 PM
1

You just made an unrelated claim that has nothing to do with the post. Again, if you were in college or high school, you would get an F on your discussion board.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 06:13 PM
1

You can’t just say it’s evidence that doesn’t make it actually evidence you need to explain how it makes sense and you haven’t done that yet. You have poor critical thinking skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 05:59 PM
1

That’s not evidence actually so you didn’t provide anything. You have poor critical thinking skills
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 03:20 AM
1

So you didn’t really make a coherent logical argument. What does the fact that women initiate most divorces prove?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 01:40 AM
1

Can you explain the link, without making assumptions?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 01:26 AM
1

Name the piece in the source you feel supports your argument and why
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 12:42 AM
1

If it’s proof, then show how it’s true. If it’s not something you can show then it’s not proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 03:52 PM
1

None of that is proof for whatever argument you’re trying to make
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 04:51 AM
1

I know, but how can I reason what you’re saying if you don’t tell me what you’re thinking clearly? Pretend you’re in high school again. Your teacher would fail this as an essay. Poor communication and poor critical thinking skills
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 03:33 AM
1

If people can’t understand you then it is your fault, especially if you’re not writing much
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 03:22 AM
1

And so what is your point? Pretend that you are writing an essay and I am your teacher. An essay with just a few sentences like that we’ll get an F because it’s not persuasive and it doesn’t make factual sense. Try harder and use your brain, please.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 10:10 PM
1

What you wrote is just not an argument. You just made an argument to nowhere. It doesn’t mean anything you said divorce rates and nothing else. Articulate yourself, better and circle back and explain why divorce rates matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 08:40 PM
1

How do you figure that?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 08:37 PM
2

How do divorce stats prove anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 07:03 PM
1

OK so? The research is now outdated and has no pertinence to real life then?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 06:37 PM
1

So what is your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 06:34 PM
2

So that means that the data set from OP is incorrect?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 06:10 PM
3

The paper is right only in its narrow context, not in how real life works. If more than 60% of young men under 30 are single and only 30% of women are according to Pew, that’s a big subset of the population outside the scope of the research, unless it’s accounted for somehow. But then the premise of “unequal housework is why people are single” collapses for people in general, becuase it’s too narrow in scope, only applying to people in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 05:46 PM
1

Proof?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 05:44 PM
6

Your perspective is invalid because a lot of people aren’t in relationships so this dynamic never comes into play. You have poor critical thinking skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 03:13 PM
4

Where is the proof for your speculative assumption? You’re just making stuff up without evidence. Everything you wrote can be discarded as conjecture.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 06:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter