| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | Comedian Joe Rogan physically assaulted by feminist; smacks her down - only 240p sryShe probably took Joe for a dumb frat boy. Joe, on the other hand, saw her as someone who doesn't have healthy boundaries and who usually gets away with dumb shit because every else is either too polite to put her in her place, or just not good enough at the debate game to jump all her bullshit hurdles. He was probably just having fun stepping on her toes. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 19/06/17 11:24 PM |
| 4 | Swedish Political Party Says It Should be Illegal for Men to Stand While Urinatingexasperates Exacerbates.* Agreed on all other points, though. | /r/MensRights | 14/02/17 05:44 PM |
| 21 | Woman who tortured, killed man was featured speaker at Women's March - guilty of second degree murder and two counts of first degree kidnappingover and over You presented a single source and the other poster's reply was in the context of that. There is no "over and over" here, just a single instance of polite skepticism. And we can neither assume that you're better or worse than us at checking facts, which is why we need to be skeptical of your sources. If you present us with a single, heavily ideologically slanted source, we can't possibly be expected to simply assume that you've done your due diligence. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/17 12:50 PM |
| 2 | Denmark's 29,000 Doctors Declare Circumcision of Healthy Boys an "Ethically Unacceptable" Procedure Offering no Meaningful Health BenefitsThis might sound really silly, but I actually hadn't considered just doing that to be an alternative. | /r/MensRights | 21/01/17 01:09 PM |
| 0 | Denmark's 29,000 Doctors Declare Circumcision of Healthy Boys an "Ethically Unacceptable" Procedure Offering no Meaningful Health BenefitsWell... what I had done when I was twelve or so was an alternative. Of course, I am going to discuss alternatives if I do wind up getting this done, but I'm also going to have a certain skepticism towards those alternatives because they haven't worked for me in the past. | /r/MensRights | 21/01/17 12:45 PM |
| -3 | Denmark's 29,000 Doctors Declare Circumcision of Healthy Boys an "Ethically Unacceptable" Procedure Offering no Meaningful Health BenefitsAs much as I respect this, I wish I'd been circumcised as an infant. Not for religious reasons, because my family isn't Jewish, but because my dad had to have his foreskin "fixed" years before my birth and it still wasn't perfect. I also have phimosis, and the initial surgery only solved the problem halfway, so now I'm 26 and considering circumcision, but... it's a bigger deal for an adult man than it is for an infant. But again, this is purely from a medical standpoint. Circumcision based on re… | /r/MensRights | 21/01/17 12:14 PM |
| 1 | Wow...just wowI'll see alt right websites (because I do listen to the opposition) ... I'm saying they can openly believe me while simultaneously thinking women are a creation of Lucifer without an inkling of hypocrisy. And no; you are the one with the extreme position, and beyond saying that it is undeniable, you have provided ZERO proof. If the existence of a global patriarchy is so absolutely undeniable as to be objective, axiomatic truth, it shouldn't be difficult for you to prove it. It takes a zealot to … | /r/MensRights | 06/10/16 08:02 PM |
| 1 | Wow...just wowWell, before we get into that, I'd like to hear your best guess. This was the first time I actually mentioned my own beliefs and political leanings, and while I say that I don't "believe" in the patriarchy, I don't mean that I am somehow certain that it doesn't exist. It's a statement of profound skepticism. You, however, have used statements of absolute, dogmatic certainty from the very first comment you made in this thread. You defined people who don't believe in the patriarchy as Christian al… | /r/MensRights | 06/10/16 07:23 PM |
| 1 | Wow...just wowOkay, well, I'm 100% progressive social democrat and 0% conservative. I support equal rights for women in every way. I also don't believe in the patriarchy. Why do I not believe in the patriarchy? | /r/MensRights | 06/10/16 07:15 PM |
| 1 | Wow...just wowAre all MRA alt right? | /r/MensRights | 06/10/16 07:06 PM |
| 1 | Wow...just wowWhere? Geez dude, in this very comment for one. Also, Almost every large society today is operated as a patriarchy not egalitarian nor as a matriarchy. And It does exist globally and on an almost subliminal, supercultural level. And We just leave in a patriarchy and even though it mostly hurts women it can hurt men as well. I'm not an MRA. I'm also not a feminist. Many of my closest friends are feminists, but while I agree with them on the whole "equal rights"-thing, I make them work for my agre… | /r/MensRights | 06/10/16 06:46 PM |
| 1 | Wow...just wowI already did that, and you already made it clear that find it to be beyond obvious that it does. What I've been trying to tell you is that other people don't necessarily believe in a patriarchy, and you can't act as if they're all just denying an undeniable truth. | /r/MensRights | 06/10/16 06:34 PM |
| 1 | Wow...just wowDoes everybody believe in God? And if not, do any of those who don't believe in God feel that they have a more than valid reason not to do so? | /r/MensRights | 06/10/16 05:56 PM |
| 1 | Wow...just wowNo, we're really not. We're engaging at a fairly low level. I'm not arguing feminism, and I'm not arguing nature v. nurture. What I'm trying to explain is that some people don't believe that there is a global patriarchy, and that they then wouldn't be satisfied with "because of the patriarchy!" as an explanation. Also, that... I can almost guarantee that none of the little boys will have dolls and none of the little girls will have action figures ...Wouldn't be seen as acceptable evidence of pat… | /r/MensRights | 06/10/16 11:21 AM |
| 1 | Wow...just wowI was just justifying "globally". Yep, I understood the intent. As an argument, though, it was very tautological. That is, what the argument boiled down to was that the patriarchy is global because of the way in which it is global. It's more reiteration than argument. I'd say it's more evidence of mores and folkways being shaped by the patriarch than anything. Well, yes, you would say that because you don't view the patriarchy as something that can be questioned. For someone who doesn't share yo… | /r/MensRights | 05/10/16 07:13 PM |
| 1 | Wow...just wowAlmost every large society today is operated as a patriarchy not egalitarian nor as a matriarchy. Well... with respect for your position, that is a statement rather than an argument. give an adult some toys to hand out and I can almost guarantee that none of the little boys will have dolls and none of the little girls will have action figures. Sure, but only someone who already believes that to be evidence of the patriarchy would view that as being evidence of the patriarchy. Some people would a… | /r/MensRights | 05/10/16 05:10 PM |
| 1 | Wow...just wowHow would you argue for that belief if questioned? | /r/MensRights | 05/10/16 03:31 PM |
| 1 | Wow...just wowYep, that is an example of the type of culture that is undeniably patriarchal. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/16 03:27 PM |
| 3 | Wow...just wowGlobally and on an almost subliminal, supercultural level. From a men's rights perspective, a patriarchal structure could exist in specific systems, depending on who you ask. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/16 02:33 PM |
| 16 | Wow...just wowComing from /r/all, but the general stance of men's rights groups regarding patriarchy is that it doesn't exist in the sort of generalised, overarching fashion in which it is described by modern feminism. If the existence of a patriarchy in, say, the US isn't viewed as a foregone conclusion, a statement like "but patriarchy hurts men too!" would be viewed as a patronising and very flimsy cop-out. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/16 01:41 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter