TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ProfVanDusen Archive

View 8 posts and 48 comments by ProfVanDusen on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

"Was told"? Was told by WHO? Your employer? You may have a claim.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 04:18 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 04:13 PM
10

If they really thought this was a man, the first reaction should have been to fear for HIS safety, not their own. He looks to be inebriated, and he's groping around outside in the snow wearing only his underwear, unable even to keep his eyes open. It's obvious that he's scarcely a threat to anyone. We should worry about his safety at that women's college. After all, there are so few available male sex partners for the heterosexual women in the prime of life, it is he who might be sexually abused…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 03:34 PM
3

Where are the feminist leaders, like DAVID FUTRELLE, to condemn this?
/r/MensRights05/02/14 03:26 PM
37

Instead of trolling this site looking for people to ridicule, David Futrelle and other feminist apologists need to clean up their own house first. They need to answer for and condemn hate speech like this.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 03:10 PM
1

Really? The GOP is just as bad as the Democrats on men's issues? Do you remember what John McCain said about Title IX cutting men's sports teams on campus? (He opposed it - Obama is okay with it.) Do you remember the Bush administration commissioned the CONSOL report that found no significant evidence that the wage gap was caused by discrimination -- then the Obama administration quickly removed the Consol report from the Dept. of Labor web site? Did the Bush administration vote to roll back due…
/r/MensRights23/01/14 01:11 PM
5

"I want every young man in America to feel some strong peer pressure in terms of how they are supposed to behave and treat women,” Obama said. Well, you young men voted for him. How's that workin' out for you?
/r/MensRights22/01/14 10:21 PM
16

This is even more offensive than I thought it would be. Basically, any interaction between a man and woman other than the guy's wife means the guy was cheating. Where are the feminist crusaders who troll this site to take issue with repugnant articles like this? Hmm? David Futrelle?
/r/MensRights17/01/14 03:49 PM
8

Yeah, because I'm sure that when members of the Academy vote on a particular achievement in motion pictures, they first inquire as to the gender of the person behind it.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 02:50 PM
33

Yet feminist extremists like David Futrelle make no attempt to distance themselves from these lies. The truth is a lot more complicated than these people let on, but ads like this one make it sound like workers at McDonalds are paid on two scales, the male and the female scales.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 03:23 PM
2

I'm the ANTI-David. I am here to spread the word that whatever talent for writing and thinking the Futrelles had went down with the TITANIC. I am going to expose that fat, under-employed, obsessed nitwit as a hater. And his goofy, self-righteous friend who writes about conspiracies, with an audience of about 3. What else would you like to know?
/r/MensRights15/01/14 03:47 AM
6

Brilliant. Misguided fools like DAVID FUTRELLE, who waste their time trying to poke holes in men's righters' logic, ought to stop prowling this site for "material" to feed his ravenous lionesses and start policing his own house first. There is so much hatred in self-proclaimed feminist sites, one would have to be blind, deaf, and dumb not to notice it. That Futrelle doesn't notice it tells you everything you need to know about him.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 12:34 AM
1

The women haters here are an embarrassment. They are idiots. With that said, you will never hear David Futrelle say the same thing about the radical feminists, likely because he pretty much agrees with them.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 12:08 PM
15

All feminists, including DAVID FUTRELLE, need to answer for feminist hate speech. They need to clean up their own house first before trolling here to find things to criticize.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 06:01 PM
3

It's different when the genders are reversed. Every feminist, starting with David Futrelle, needs to answer for this sort of hate -- which is common among feminists. They need to get their own house in order before starting entire blogs devoted to ridiculing men's rights advocates.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 04:20 AM
10

All feminists, starting with DAVID FUTRELLE, need to answer for such hate. They need to stand up and police their own before they come prowling to men's rights sites to find things to criticize.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 04:16 AM
4

Let's see you make that same argument when the genders are reversed. You won't do that -- you wait to make your "rational" pitch when the victim was a boy.
/r/PussyPass09/01/14 11:33 PM
1

P.S. Neal Gabler, among many others, disagrees with your slander of Walt. Jackass.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 11:31 PM
1

"I'm seriously drawing a blank here." Well, you certainly come off as a blank. How's THAT for "name calling"? Because the quote in my headline is from Streep. It wasn't me calling names. Of course you know so damn much about Walt Disney, you can't be bothered to read the very thing my post was about. More name calling: jackass.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 11:23 PM
2

The USDOJ hardly responds even to FIRE when it voices the same concerns.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 10:35 PM
1

The "average mra" is no different than the vast majority of Americans -- who, incidentally, don't buy the feminist bullshit, first wave, fifth wave, or last wave. It is an extremist cult not worthy of serious study.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 10:33 PM
1

Third wave, third shmave. That's bullshit terminology that doesn't mean anything outside that sorry cult. No offense. The fact is, all of that stuff I posted by Futrelle might have been written by any number of so-called "men's rights" activists, and David Futrelle would be looking at it closely looking for something to make fun of so he could affirm his credentials with angry, self-righteous feminist bloggers.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 05:28 PM
1

Otherwise known as a "bribe."
/r/MensRights05/01/14 03:35 AM
6

He's a true humanitarian doing a great service by repeating what some bloggers have said, and then insisting that even sincere bloggers be lumped in with the kooks. Yep. A real humanitarian. Funny, though--he never does a post on Dworkin's stupidity. Have you noticed that? Guess his minions (you included, it's my guess, right?) wouldn't care for that. And his game seems to be to gain "acceptance" by the major feminist bloggers. (What an admirable life goal!) Actually, my bet is he's working on a…
/r/MensRights05/01/14 03:23 AM
0

Why, indeed!
/r/MensRights05/01/14 03:19 AM
1

Good questions.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 03:18 AM
1

See, this is the problem with some of the posts here. You assume the accusations are false. You assume the company did not do a fair investigation. You assume the man was wronged. You need to pick your spots. There is no basis for any of those assumptions.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 03:18 AM
7

His minions read this subreddit very closely. They will not approve of these writings.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 02:26 AM
1

I was surprised.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 02:19 AM
5

Well, I didn't "have" to, but I was surprised to find it. Frankly, I have no idea what he believes. His current blog thinks it's enough to ridicule anyone and every one in the men's rights camp, for reasons known only to him.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 02:18 AM
0

P.S. I posted it because it was written by . . . David Futrelle.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 02:04 AM
1

I agree!
/r/MensRights05/01/14 02:01 AM
0

Yes, that AVfM are real BOOBZ, right, jpflathead?
/r/MensRights28/12/13 03:19 PM
2

Well, feminists don't, that's for sure. Ba-da-bing!
/r/MensRights27/12/13 01:31 AM
9

UMMM YOU ARE A DIMWIT. They spammed a site where people report rape anonymously -- where no justice is served, and where the rapist is allowed to rape OTHER WOMEN. You dimwitted radicals ought to be encouraging women to GO TO THE POLICE. All caps because you are a dimwit. Dimwit.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 01:31 AM
6

You argue well, grasshopper! "Holy shit" is your rationale. Your "truth" speaks for itself, I suppose. At least to you it does. Feminists are really pathetic, aren't they?
/r/MensRights26/12/13 12:49 PM
3

Because the men are excusing free agency and the feminists aren't calling the shots.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 11:48 PM
13

No. This is a thousand times worse. No one was offended by the 400 spams. This was an affront to an entire faith. But, of course, feminists hate religion. And men. And rational discourse. They are good at snark and feigning offense, that's about it.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 11:46 PM
10

The sort of activism David Futrelle always talks about.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 11:45 PM
1

You're ruining everything with your mean comments!
/r/MensRights08/11/13 02:54 PM
3

What a valuable service David provides! Cough, cough.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 03:15 AM
1

Young men and women went overwhelmingly for Obama. If they had stayed home, like they did in 2010, we'd have President Romney now. That's a fact.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 08:21 PM
1

"well that's not an assumption what so ever." No, it's a fact. P.S. Have you started to campaign for Hillary yet? You go, girlfriend!
/r/MensRights06/11/13 08:19 PM
8

Hey, young men -- you belong to a demographic that voted overwhelmingly for Obama. Are you happy? Or didn't you realize he doesn't care about you, he only cares about your sisters?
/r/MensRights06/11/13 05:11 AM
5

How about feminist men who write blogs?
/r/MensRights06/11/13 05:09 AM
-4

Well, the young men who frequent this site voted for him. They didn't realize he doesn't care about them, despite the fact it was obvious. He cares only about their sisters. But, anyway, if they survive the next three years, they'll probably vote for Hillary, because they never seem to learn. Hope they never get sick, or they'll have to find a young woman to support them.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 05:08 AM
4

David Futrelle provides an important public service. What that public service is, nobody knows.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 02:16 AM
5

Oh, people talk a big game about equality, but when it comes to the issue of mandatory national service, we see their true colors. Most people really don't believe in equality.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 12:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter