TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ProfaneGhost Archive

View 0 posts and 65 comments by ProfaneGhost on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

For the sake of clarity
/r/MensRights18/08/22 11:13 PM
2

"Five of the six major American television broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox, and MyNetworkTV) all have production facilities and offices throughout various areas of Los Angeles." We hit a lot more targets with Hollywood and then new york/wall street rather than going after just CNN in Atlanta.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 11:06 AM
3

Yeah, the news networks are never used for communications.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 10:52 AM
6

I swear, it's like none of you have ever been in a conflict. You always scramble the communications before you attack the home base, that way they can't call for help.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 10:37 AM
4

Picking Wall Street first sounds like social bias. When Hollywood is gone, nobody will be there to broadcast Wall street's screams.
/r/MensRights17/08/22 10:34 AM
10

I want off this planet.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 06:39 AM
1

He's admitting that there are biological differences between men and women and how we date. Women find it harder to get a committed relationship. Men find it harder to get sex. Why wouldn't we praise people who achieve difficult tasks?
/r/MensRights27/02/22 11:53 AM
1

It is a patriarchal tradition. That's a fact. No it's not. That's a fact. I can make assertions without evidence too. Whether it gave men more rights or responsibilities is an open debate, but it was founded and maintained by patriarchal system, lets be honest about it. I'm not just going to accept your assertion here. The laws around marriage changed in 1960s-70s, after 'no-fault' divorce. How does this contradict what I said? Unless you think feminists and advocates for women didn't exist befo…
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:44 AM
1

Debeers created the market for diamonds in America. It was literally demand created by advertising. There is no tradition in the diamond engagement ring, regardless of wealth. Japan never had engagement rings before debeers. It is no surprising men find the idea so galling. It is galling. I agree with entirety of what you're saying here. I just don't know why you said "its a commercial construct to sell diamonds to the Japanese" in light of this paragraph you have now written. Can you explain? T…
/r/MensRights08/01/22 05:51 AM
1

Are some things historical? Yes. Have some of the issues still relevant? Yes. Have things changed - yes. Multiple things can be true at once without contradiction. Do historical issues perpetuate? Sometimes. It isn't black and white as you seem to think it is. Then why not be specific in your language? Which one of these is affecting you or women in first world nations that would be reasonable to be upset about? I don't have the energy right now for the mental gymnastics required to decipher thi…
/r/MensRights08/01/22 04:48 AM
1

I didn't make any leap. My comments were related to a historical context the is well documented. Traditional gender roles existed in some western cultures for some time and this involved a number of assumptions and expectations, notably the changing of the name to join the husbands family. I mean we can go into the European traditions of marrying house holds together for financial and political gain if you want. I don't see how the historical context effects you or your choice in any way whatsoe…
/r/MensRights08/01/22 04:15 AM
1

I think there are a lot of things packed up in the expectation of women taking someone else’s surname rather than the patriarchal tradition of having your fathers surname. It spoke to and outdated idea of women leaving their family of origin to create a household headed by her husband. Once upon a time women were subjugated by their roles as wives and mothers v the breadwinner and head of a household. You experienced being subjugated by your husband or any of the other things you wrote here? Or …
/r/MensRights08/01/22 02:54 AM
1

I'm a left leaning libertarian according to the polcomp, but go off. I never said you had to have traditional gender roles; I said having them does not necessitate inequality. Being forced into them would, but nobody's forced into gender roles in first world countries. Strop strawmanning people and get a life.
/r/MensRights08/01/22 02:49 AM
1

I don't see how that changes the point. I don't think those things are packed in there unless your personally choose to pack them in there. Nobody else can choose what's in an idea you have about a subject (marriage and changing surnames, for example) except you. I'd like to know why you're packing the theoretical personal baggage of other people into the concept of changing surnames as part of marriage? I never restricted your topic; what you're doing is poisoning the well by trying to make it …
/r/MensRights08/01/22 01:39 AM
1

That seems like an awful system for any legal documents. Plantiff John maria de santa cruz de maria de la muerte vs Defendent Daniel consuela santa maria juarez.
/r/MensRights08/01/22 12:16 AM
2

Marriage is a patriarchal tradition? That's why it gives all the power to the woman in a divorce, right? In the past it made the man legally responsible for his wife's crimes for fucks sake.
/r/MensRights08/01/22 12:14 AM
0

I don't think there are unless you personally feel like packing those things into it. In which case, why carry on baggage that's not even yours?
/r/MensRights08/01/22 12:11 AM
-1

Do you also take the dick from your partner? It's not inequality to want to have different expectations for different roles in a relationship. It's inequality if people were forcing you to.
/r/MensRights08/01/22 12:09 AM
8

Turnabout is fair play is a reasonable tactic when fighting an enemy.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 07:32 PM
4

Please show me the last time the right wing pushed back against funding for male domestic violence shelters? Because left wing feminists do all the time. Google Earl Silverman when you get a chance.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 07:30 PM
14

You don't get a free pass for blindly listening to the police. People have had their lives ruined for doing so.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 07:23 PM
5

Your second link is dead btw. If anything that's evidence against the hate group argument since they had to delete or got reported. International Men's Day happens - "SHUT THE FUCK UP." But oh, "we're the ones who are oppressed, it's so hard to live in a society that 100% completely revolves around us." Also, for the second panel... I would argue that women are the ones who are allowed to destroy the mental health of those around them for any tiny invented occasion. I don't really think this is …
/r/MensRights21/11/21 03:46 AM
8

Lady, unless you actually show me one specifically you want to discuss that's just an assertion. Also are you going to act like a few commenters on a public forum represent the majority?
/r/MensRights21/11/21 12:14 AM
8

I'd say the legal system lets women off almost 6 times as often as they charge or incarcerate men. There's a significant incarceration gap. It's not about demonizing men though; it's about protecting women, like most things are.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 10:45 PM
15

Not liking a group that actively campaigns against your rights and support doesn't make you a hate group. Are you for real?
/r/MensRights20/11/21 09:37 PM
15

Just because you haven't felt that way doesn't mean it hasn't happened. Going by the other comments you seem the type to rationalize that happening to you from a woman. So, it's men's fault that women demonize us for a small minority of people? That seems like victim blaming and sexism. If you blamed black people for white people considering them rapists back in the 60's you'd realize that was racist, so how do you not get that this is equivalently sexist? Your evident hatred for your own gender…
/r/MensRights20/11/21 09:34 PM
0

Glad I could help 👍
/r/MensRights10/11/21 03:17 PM
4

Bruh, those aren't the rules and you're just dodging having to defend what you believe. Those are two random feminist news websites, you're only demonstrating my point that normal people don't think that way.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 03:13 PM
5

bro insulting and vilifying people is not a community building activity That's a strawman. You only call it that when it happens to people you like, which if apparently that's determined by race/sex for you is pretty racist/sexist. Comedy and banter are certainly community building activities.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 03:09 PM
5

It's quite literally treating people differently and excluding them from a community building activity based on their sex or race. If that's not racism/sexism what is? Just because that's how you and your little circle of friends were raised and saw that on tv doesn't mean that any of us living in the real world think that way.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 03:08 PM
6

You don't get to determine lighthearted comedy from bullying based on things like race and sex. That's literally racist and sexist. Those things are determined based on intent.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 02:57 PM
5

That concept is just absurd gatekeeping of whom can be made fun of. I don't punch up/down, I punch lines.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 02:55 PM
1

Okay I did. Now I'm beginning to infer you're an obstanant moron.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 02:50 AM
4

When you list them together it's normal to assume they're all being presented in the same light. I'm not going to throw away my basic inference skills just because you don't want to write clearly.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 01:32 AM
4

It's not my fault you misrepresented the video in your comment. Did you honestly expect anybody to read Video about men's rights, feminism, and the patriarchy, how men have needs too, but doesn't talk shit on feminism. and think it was a video about how patriarchy theory is bad? The only mistake I made here was trusting you in your representation of the video. Maybe you should honestly represent things, instead of omitting important details, so that way people don't have to do additional researc…
/r/MensRights10/11/21 12:19 AM
3

That's a pretty extraordinary hypothetical though. I think it's fair to assume women vote in Switzerland in the 21st century.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 08:35 PM
5

I mean, if you're talking about "patriarchy theory" you're bashing on men, so I don't exactly see that as very neutral. But do they deserve a chance based on their behavior?
/r/MensRights09/11/21 08:33 PM
8

Based af
/r/MensRights09/11/21 08:31 PM
3

Any survey will show the vast majority of women aren't feminists.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 02:09 AM
1

I can't tell if you're agreeing with me or arguing with me tbh.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 10:15 PM
0

He escalated the conversation by calling her a racist for not wanting to fuck her. While the pedo addition was a little out of line what he was saying ("have sex with me/date me or you're racist") is rapey. It's the exact argument you'll hear trans women yelling at lesbians ("have sex with me or you're transphobic) and it's super rapey. but I'm inclined to believe the height became an issue because that's a pretty common thing for women on dating apps to fixate on in their bio or in the beginnin…
/r/MensRights06/11/21 04:56 AM
1

Stranger danger
/r/MensRights05/11/21 11:35 PM
1

Now you're just projecting. I'm just simply asking if he picked you yet, as your simping for him. I don't know why that bothers you so much.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 11:32 PM
0

No, the indian man you're defending and lusting after did. Try to keep up.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 11:22 PM
0

Much like trying to force someone to fuck you by calling them racists if they don't. I just want you to be honest with yourself. 😂
/r/MensRights05/11/21 11:12 PM
0

It's 2021, you can come out. We won't judge you. 😂
/r/MensRights05/11/21 10:57 PM
1

Did he pick you yet?
/r/MensRights05/11/21 10:03 PM
-2

Imagine simping for short Indian men lmao. You really want to show bob and vagene, huh?
/r/MensRights05/11/21 08:22 PM
-2

You're literally just like the feminists who call all women who fall out of line even slightly pickmes.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 08:04 PM
-2

That's exactly what feminists say when people disagree with them. Really living up to the stereotype that MRA's are no better right now.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 06:32 PM
-1

No, but that hardly changes that OP has done the exact same by your own admission. You're just deflecting.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 09:27 AM
-1

Again, I don't disagree. However, I do disagree with going around assuming people are racists. Also, she never said "you indian" so who ae you quoting? Yourself?
/r/MensRights05/11/21 09:26 AM
2

There certainly are, weird how OP chose to omit them if they make her look worse, seeing as that's the whole point of his post. You'd think he'd include it if it's so damning. 🤔 With all that in mind I think it's more reasonable to give her the benefit of the doubt here, unless OP wants to prove it.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 09:24 AM
1

I don't think she ever attributed it to just indians. If I say "this house is big" that doesn't mean "only this house is big and no others are". You're just bent on making this a race issue when you've literally conceded in your first sentence I'm right: Marriage is a big part of Indian culture
/r/MensRights05/11/21 09:21 AM
0

Okay, do you disagree that marriage is important in Indian culture? Is that not the case? Is there not a heavy religious and conservative aspect to the culture at all?
/r/MensRights05/11/21 09:16 AM
-2

You mean her commentary on indian culture being typically conservative and marriage-focused? That's not racist. You guys go feminist and forget India is a geographical location real quick.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 09:14 AM
-26

right cause stereotyping indian men as sex predators is not racism and making people feel bad about themselves for being short is not heightist at all. Heistism isn't a thing and it makes you sound like a feminist. She stereotyped someone using sex predator tactics as such. You're just playing the race card, like a feminist. right someone who claims that being sex predator is ''indian men ideology'' is absolutely not a racist. That's not what she said, she was talking about marriage. India has a…
/r/MensRights05/11/21 07:22 AM
-26

make wild claims You mean like that someone is racist and "heightist" for not fucking you? attacking and accusing the other person when presented with facts You mean like he attacked her by calling her a racist when presented with the fact she didn't want to fuck him? Bruh both of these people aren't great, but she's not the one starting off calling people racist. I honestly don't get this one.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 06:34 AM
-6

Two wrongs don't exactly make a right.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 06:30 AM
-5

I'm gonna gave to disagree with you guys here. He started the wild accusations by calling her a racist and "heightist" (lmao). Then got all defensive when he got a taste of his own medicine. She compared this short man who was trying to call people racists for not fucking her to a pedo. Honestly that was a little far, but this is just like the trans people who call you transphobic if you don't fuck them; it's definitely rapey as hell. I honwstly can't believe you guys.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 06:30 AM
2

Anybody who might've probably got banned forever ago.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 11:21 AM
9

You need to talk to a lawyer. That's not okay. Don't downplay your own suffering until it's too late to do anything about it.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 09:39 PM
3

They're all going to be uber feminist resources that tell you you're in the wrong for being abused still.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 04:09 PM
19

Who cares about what looks bad to fake insecure people?
/r/MensRights10/05/21 09:21 PM
2

Just tell them you're black like Shaun King.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 10:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter