TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ProfessorChuckFinley Archive

View 2 posts and 534 comments by ProfessorChuckFinley on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Lets not pretend that men have anything nearly as strong as makeup. Makeup can make an ugly women look average and make an average woman look stunning. Men could make themselves look a little better with stuff like moisturizer, but its nowhere near as effective as makeup. Furthermore, plenty of men are willing to "sleep down", just cause they wanna get laid. Plenty of attractive men will fuck average looking women. Given that even ugly women can use makeup to look average, most women can sleep w…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 06:57 AM
1

the fact tht u didnt knw that tinder has 5-10 men for every woman - even furthur proves how illogical u It doesnt, its closer to 3:1. But most men on it are unsuccessful. If all the men with minimal/no success deleted it, there would be more women than men. keep simping for Stacys,inkwell :) Well Im not a simp or incel but ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 10:59 AM
1

Youve once again failed to address my argument, while repeating the same statements that Ive already addressed. I am a Stacy Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 10:21 AM
1

And i pointed out how the numbers,logic and intentions add up to a polyandrous casual sex market place No, you pointed out that more men want casual sex. Your numbers and "logic" (lmao) are based on what men want, not what they have. You are saying more men than women are having casual sex because more men want it. Im pointing out the fact that although more men want it, most arent getting it, because women are "sleeping up." This isnt a controversal fact. The bottom men are sexless, the bottom …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 09:59 AM
1

I pointed out that more men wanted casual sex, but only a fraction were actually having it, because women are all sleeping with the top men. You can either give a rebuttal to that or keep embarassing yourself. Up to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 09:38 AM
1

Nothing you said addresses my main point, which is that theres actually more woman than men having casual sex, because women are all sharing the top men. If you cant refute that, then the basis of your argument is wrong. Shouting "the end" doesnt change that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 09:30 AM
0

1st of all casual sex is polyandrous - meaning lots of men share a few number of women since the supply(women into casual sex) is wayyyyy less than the demand(men into casual sex) and many IRL and OLD numbers prove this No, more men are willing to have casual sex, but only a small fraction of them actually get casual sex. More women than men are having casual sex because women can sleep with men way out of their league. More men than women want casual sex, but only the top men are actually havin…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 09:11 AM
8

The media reports news as if mens problems dont matter, but womens problems do. So, if there is a problem that effects men more than women, its still going to be reported as a "problem for women" because thats the only part of the problem that the media cares about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/20 08:59 AM
3

The fact that u even thought that an OLD app or website with its main goal being casual sex - would have more women or less than 5-10 creeps per woman is laughable to say the least Not really, its much easier for women to have success. If all of the men who had little/no success stopped using the app, it would easily be majority women. second of all sex(esp casual sex) is LOW risk,HIGH reward for men while its HIGH risk(rape,STDs/STIs,pregnancy,no cumming/enjoyment) ,LOW reward for women No, its…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 08:39 AM
1

Yeah 3:1 ratio sounds more accurate. 9:1? No way
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 08:10 AM
4

Source? From what I found, the ratio is about 3:1
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 07:08 AM
4

9:1? No
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 06:07 AM
2

You are right. Tinder has a male/female ratio of 9:1. Really? I wouldve thought that women used it either more than men or almost as much as men, because they can use it to find "top" men. Even a 3/10 can put on makeup, look like a 6/10, and use tinder to find a bunch of 8+/10 guys to bang/date. Online dating heavily favors women regardless of the statistical imbalance. So its weird to hear that its 9:1 men to women. Do you have a source and/or a theory as to why that is?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/20 05:33 AM
12

First of all, feminists hold men and women to very different standards. Johnny Depp and Amber Heard are a great example. When Amber claimed abuse, feminists wouldnt shut up about it. When Depp proved she was the abuser, feminists went silent. This isnt just an isolated example. Feminists arent screeching "RAPE" when a drunk guy has sex, but they do screech it when a drunk woman has sex. So no, feminists dont hold men and women to the same standards. Secondly, I agree men and women should be held…
/r/PussyPass30/11/20 04:35 AM
41

Because its a feminist sub first, a neoliberal sub second, and a mans sub last. Any male issues must be discussed from the perspective of feminist theory. Any male issue is either "toxic masculinity" or "patriarchy", and they argue that mens issues will be solved as soon as women achieve equality. "How can I be less predatory towards women?" (and similar questions) are pretty common over there. Posts that discuss real mens issues and their actual causes (instead of "patriarchy") barely get upvot…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/20 07:11 AM
2

"Hey, is that your mom again?"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/11/20 09:22 PM
1

Handle?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/11/20 06:19 AM
1

Feminism doesn’t want a society where any man can be imprisoned without proof, this is bad faith fear-mongering. Stop it. Lmao. The feminist mob tries to cancel any man accused of any sexual crime, even if theres no evidence.
/r/AntiFeminists24/11/20 02:58 PM
3

Yeah I agree that believe all women is bad optics and many liberal feminists go too far with it So why are you asking "what does this have to do with feminism?" You answered your own question. I agree that people shouldn’t be trashed online for accusations without proof, but that’s not the problem in question Feminists want a society where men are "trashed", fired, imprisoned, etc without proof. If a woman accuses a man of a sexual crime, feminists want it to be "guilty until proven innocent", l…
/r/AntiFeminists24/11/20 10:26 AM
2

there's no benefit in getting with a asshole/bad boy when it comes to status or whatever because most of these men are low status. Its not about objective socioeconomic status. Its about perceived social dominance. Its a primitive instinct. Bad boys usually don't have high status, but women perceive them as high status because their behavior is perceived as dominance by womens primitive instincts. Humans, in general, behave certain ways when they are dealing with higher status and lower status p…
/r/MGTOW23/11/20 09:04 PM
1

High IQ
/r/MGTOW23/11/20 10:59 AM
35

Soyciety 101
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/11/20 08:39 AM
59

OPs theory only applies to certain situations. When women hate nice guys, its not usually because they perceive it as "plotting." Most of the time, they hate nice guys because niceness is unattractive to them. They are attracted to social dominance and status, and they perceive niceness to be the opposite of that. Assholes/bad boys are way more successful with women than nice guys. Not because they perceive niceness as "plotting", but because they perceive it as weakness. They see nice guys as b…
/r/MGTOW23/11/20 08:27 AM
9

Its not advice, its just them hating on men.
/r/AntiFeminists19/11/20 05:23 AM
17

Simping knows no bounds
/r/MGTOW16/11/20 09:39 AM
2

Tons of men are thinking about stability. The only men not thinking about it are the Chads/alphas that have so much success with women that they dont want to be tied down. Unfortunately for women, those are the same men that they want to be in exclusive relationships with. Women could easily get exclusive relationships from men, just not with the men that they want to be exclusive with.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/20 07:46 PM
1

I myself am a feminist Why? Women have all the legal rights as men, they no longer have negative cultural expectations (like "math isnt for girls"), and they have lots of social privileges. Women are advantaged in every way except sexual harassment. As a feminist, what are you still fighting for? Do you also consider yourself an anti-vietnam war activist?
/r/MensRights12/11/20 07:57 PM
0

Do you think that most women who identify as feminists think that way? Yes, only a small percent of women want to get rid of their privileges for the sake of true equality. Do you think that there is no valid reason for a women’s rights movement to exist anymore? Or that there never was? No valid reason for it to exist today. There was a valid reason until pretty recently (within a few decades). Do you think a woman or man can be a feminist and advocate for men’s rights at the same time? Yes but…
/r/MensRights12/11/20 10:05 AM
3

They AREN'T sleeping, they have spent billions trying to ensure equal parenting rights does NOT happen. Source? I believe you and I'd like a source for future reference.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 07:53 AM
2

I don’t think the average feminist doesn’t want it. They just aren’t focusing on it. No, they are against it because it would mean they lose some of their privileges, which they refuse to give up. They dont want actual equality. They want "equality" wherever theyre behind, but they dont want equality wherever theyre ahead. it’s not their mission to help men, it’s their mission to help women Correct. Im not saying feminists should advocate for mens issues. Its not a matter of their "lack of help"…
/r/MensRights12/11/20 07:51 AM
4

I don’t know how feminists are sleeping on this one They dont care about true equality. They want "equality" when it benefits them but traditional gender roles when it doesnt. Really they want a society that caters to women. They advocate for that under the disguise of equality by demanding "equality" wherever women are behind, but not advocating for equality when women are ahead. When women are behind, its considered an injustice that must bd fixed. When women are ahead, its considered "equalit…
/r/MensRights12/11/20 06:39 AM
1

Feminism is a movement that does not reflect its dictionary definition. The fact that its defined as "equality" doesnt mean that feminists only advocate for equality. Feminism has already achieved legal and cultural equality. The movement did its job. The ones that cared about true equality have left the movement. The ones that stayed are the ones that either hate men or want female supremacy (such as the "believe women" campaign, where feminists wanted men to be "guilty until proven innocent").…
/r/MensRights12/11/20 06:23 AM
2

Its not chads that are fucking ugly, obese women. Its below average men. An ugly girl with a decent body can get some Chads if she uses enough makeup, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/20 03:40 AM
48

The things that SJWs say constantly contradict each other. Its because they don't truly believe in many of the things they say, they say it because they want to virtue signal. For example, someone who says "body shaming is disgusting", but then makes a small dick joke, clearly doesn't oppose body shaming. They just say it because they think it makes them morally superior.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/20 10:38 PM
2

Dude, whatre you talking about? Why do you think this channel is taken over by feminists? Why do you think that feminism will destroy itself without proper critique?
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/20 08:52 PM
4

You aren't red pilled if you think that society will rebel against feminism without proper critique of it. Society is gynocentric. It cares about womens problems, not mens. Radical feminism is becoming the norm. Its not going to defeat itself. It needs proper critique for that.
/r/AntiFeminists10/11/20 08:44 PM
4

People wont support this because, in general, people care about womens issues and not men. They care about women being sexually harassed but don't care about men being falsely accused. Lots of people believe that women wouldn't falsely accuse, because women are kweens that can do no wrong.
/r/MensRights10/11/20 07:52 PM
52

Women are showered in compliments, validation, and sometimes even money from simps who they think are losers. But yeah, women are oppressed.
/r/MGTOW10/11/20 07:48 PM
220

Its so ironic how people label mens rights as "being against women" when really its feminists who are against men. Talking about mens issues is smeared as "hate speech" and other nonsense.
/r/MensRights09/11/20 11:31 PM
8

Shkreli. Raised prices on a drug he owned. Got a real jail term. Does not it sound illogical? Pretty disgusting oversimplication. He had the rights to a drug that helped people with HIV/AIDS and he jacked the price up to an insane amount. He made the pill go from $13 each to $750 each. To label this as simply "raising prices on a drug he owned" is ridiculous. OP has a valid point because she should have gotten more than a 500k fine for her $700M fraud, but the way you are defending Shkreli is fu…
/r/MGTOW08/11/20 08:18 PM
4

The problem with the rights traditional ideas is that its "all or nothing" for society to function well. You cant mix traditionalism with things like sexual liberation and expect marriage to work. There was a time when their traditional ideas made society function like clockwork, but society has changed too much for people to benefit by being traditional. In the past, you could get married and have a good life. Today, getting married is just asking for misery. Cheating, divorce, nagging, etc. Bu…
/r/MGTOW08/11/20 04:17 PM
119

She's trying to kick and punch him while he's just standing there, but the staff is facing him as if he's the threat. If the staff had been watching her instead, he could have easily stopped her kick. But he doesn't care if the guy gets hit, he's just there to protect the girl. White knights are so pathetic.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/11/20 04:41 AM
6

In what way are women disadvantaged compared to men, and thus need a feminist movement to fix it?
/r/MensRights08/11/20 04:11 AM
10

Thats all your personal opinion, which is a respectable one. But thats not how most feminists think. You can say "those aren't real feminists" but then that would mean most feminists arent real feminits. If thats the case, then feminism has a huge problem with most feminists being fake. Also, do you consider yourself an anti-vietnam war activist? No, correct? Because the war is over, theres no reason to fight for a cause that has been one. So when it comes to "real feminism", whats left to fight…
/r/MensRights08/11/20 03:50 AM
36

It was sketchy even when it first began. Obviously things like the right to vote are important, but even when feminism was fighting for real issues like that, it still treated men like shit. Have you ever heard of the white feather? During the world wars, femimists went around giving white feathers to men who didnt wanna go to war, to shame them for "not being men." While feminism certainly fought for more serious issues in the past, the movement has always been about "equality when it benefits …
/r/MensRights08/11/20 03:00 AM
16

You said "most actual feminists support male victims of abuse." But clearly, most feminists arent supporting Depp. Plenty actually sided with Amber Heard even after Depps evidence, because they are such advocates for "believe women" and "MeToo." So do you believe that most feminists arent real feminists? And if you do, why do you think that the feminist movement has been hijacked by fake feminists? And why arent the "real feminists" doing more to reclaim the movement from fake feminists?
/r/MensRights08/11/20 02:55 AM
29

My take: women have been gaslit about experiences of abuse for pretty much all of human hiatory. MeToo only exists to correct this Another arrogant SJW who think that all of our ancestors have been evil misogynistic oppressors and only in his generation did everyone "see the light." No, feminism has happened plenty of times through history. Furthermore, even when societies were patriarchal, they were still very protective of women. Mens role was to "protect and provide for women." These "right s…
/r/MensRights08/11/20 02:47 AM
25

When Amber Heard initially made her claims, feminists went nuts. Despite a lack of evidence, they started a witch hunt against Depp. They wanted him fired, jailed, publically shamed, cancelled, etc. They wouldnt shut up about "justice for abuse victims." When Depp proved that Amber was the actual abuser, how did feminists react? Crickets All that talk about "justice for abuse victims" disappeared when it became clear that a man was the victim. Equality my ass.
/r/MensRights08/11/20 02:30 AM
112

Most homeless people are men but feminists tried to make it a female issue. Makimg claims like "1/4 homeless people are women." Very strange way of saying 3/4 homeless people are men. Its because people care more about women. Its gotten so ridiculous that people turn mens problems into womens problems. Young women have pulled ahead of men in careers and salary. This was labeled as a womens issue because now there is a "shortage of financially attractive men." Men fall behind while women pull ahe…
/r/MensRights08/11/20 02:24 AM
107

Both the left and the right are gynocentric. The right wants men to be providers and protectors of women. The left has their heads so far up their asses with identity politics and feminism that they treat men like shit. They want men fired/jailed over an accusation with 0 evidence. They want "equality" whenever men are ahead but don't want equality whenever women are ahead. They want more female engineers but not more female sewage workers. Fuck the left and the right. I'm a right leaning indepe…
/r/MGTOW07/11/20 10:42 PM
34

Amber accused Johnny with no evidence and tons of people were ready to cancel him and lock him up. He proved not only that it was a load of crap, but that she was brutally abusing him. What happened when he did? Crickets The same people who were trying to cancel Johnny suddenly went quiet. When Amber accused him, they were screeching about justice for abuse victims. When it was shown that he was the victim, they suddenly dropped their passion for "justice". Despite being proven the abuser, Heard…
/r/MGTOW07/11/20 10:08 PM
1

I answered it because I didn't see the flair. But why are you asking women "why do men turn to TRP?" instead of just asking red pill men "what made you turn to TRP?"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/20 04:32 PM
2

My bad, I didnt see the flair
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/20 02:44 AM
11

Did you flair this as "unconfirmed" or did one of the mods? If it was a mod, thats fucking ridiculous.
/r/MensRights04/11/20 04:47 PM
5

No, losers is a vague term that isnt limited to betas. Women often date "bad boys" that are losers because theyre not going anywhere in life. Like a thug who thinks hes gonna become a drug kingpin, when in reality his drug "business" is gonna be barely making enough money to survive.
/r/MGTOW03/11/20 10:13 AM
21

"Feminists just want equality and you hate women if you dont support them"
/r/MensRights03/11/20 10:08 AM
1

Hello? CEO of based?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/11/20 10:01 AM
3

The people giving that advice are male virgins or clueless women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/20 04:47 AM
9

Can you make a video about rules of texting? Like how long I should wait to text back Lmao projection. Men dont find women more attrwctive when they take long to text back. They just get annoyed. But women find it attractive when men take awhile to text back, so they assume that men find it attractive too.
/r/MGTOW02/11/20 04:44 AM
3

Based
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 01:12 AM
1

You agree with the red pill more than the blue pill, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 01:08 AM
1

Just out of curiosity, are you male or female? Your username would indicate female, but idk. It'd be interesting to know either way, based on your activity on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 01:03 AM
1

How did I make it personal? Because of out my 4 paragraphs, I wrote one sentence about dunning kruger? He is the one calling himself an "expert" while giving short-sighted arguments that indicate he has no idea about what TRP is actually about. An expert would at least have a coherent argument against TRP theory. Not a strawman and a lie. He claimed "if you ask people what an alpha male is, you'll get different answers from everyone" which is just false. Yeah maybe average people with no knowled…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/20 12:51 AM
1

What I said was neither vague not subjective. You also failed to address my argument. Which was expected, but if you cant even address the opposing sides arguments, your flair shouldnt say "expert."
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/20 09:00 PM
1

Some men genuinely don't care about things like that; they are more interested in just going with the flow because there main motives are just spending time with you Everyone has at least somewhat of a preference. Saying "I dont care" is what you do when your afraid your suggestion will be viewed negatively. Which is a concern when hanging out with people "above you" but not a concern when youre with close friends youre comfortable with. "I dont care" is beta in almost all situations.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/20 08:26 PM
14

Men are expected to work and make money no matter what else they have to do in their lives. Women aren't expected to work if they've got other stuff going on, like taking care of a household. So you are absolutely correct. If he was a woman, he'd be considered a caretaker. But since he's a man, he's a "loser still living at home."
/r/MensRights31/10/20 12:15 AM
4

Wtf is a “pussy pass” When a woman gets away with something that a man wouldnt. For example, a woman thinks she can hit a man and wont get hit back because shes a woman and hes a man. who the fuck talks like that as an adult? Talks like what? Was my sentence too long? Was the vocabulary out of your league? Try acting like this at your job and see how the other adults deal with you. I dont talk about things like female privilege at my job because Im not dumb. Are you done?
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/20 11:30 AM
5

Sorry to hear that. It will keep getting better as time goes on. Have a few fuck buddies but be careful and dont commit. Find something you love in life, whether its a career or hobby, and spend a lot of time on it. If its a career, youll go far. If its a hobby, you might get good enough to make it a career.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/10/20 11:24 AM
19

This guy is a perfect example of "you can lead s horse to water, but cant make it drink." His fiancee shoved an entire bottle of red pills in his mouth, and what did he do? Spit them out. Men like him will get cheated on, used for money, etc then talk about how the red pill is "pseudoscience" lmao.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/10/20 08:40 AM
66

Every popular story that portrays a woman negatively gets called fake by simps. Simps are beyond pathetic.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/10/20 08:25 AM
17

Lmao you are assuming she was justified in doing it, just because she was a woman, while denying that "pussy passes" exist (because youre here criticizing people who talk about pussy passes). Zero self awareness.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/20 08:02 AM
1

No, there must be some authors that are like the Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau of feminism/patriarchal theory. Im just not sure who they are. And our media is so saturated with feminist nonsense that those authors might be hard to find through a search engine. If you cant find those authors, your best bet is to use history as reference. There was a time when women didnt have jobs, didnt have all rights, stayed home and took care of the house and kids, etc. That was a real patriarchy. Maybe look up…
/r/MensRights28/10/20 04:36 AM
1

Dictionary definition from google - "a system of society or government in which the father or eldest male is head of the family and descent is traced through the male line." But you dont have to focus on the technical definition, you can just discuss the various meanings and how theyre used. People are using it to mean very different things and some of these definitions of "patriarchy" arent necessarily male dominated. If someones definition of patriarchy is "any society that does not have at le…
/r/MensRights28/10/20 03:54 AM
341

She must've been in complete shock when he threw water back. How dare you treat a woman the same way she treats you*.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/20 03:28 AM
5

A really important part of this is mentioning the true definition of a patriarchy. A real patriarchy is when men go to work and women are submissive housewives who may not have some rights, like the right to vote. Historically, we did have a patriarchy for awhile. Men were "in charge" politically, economically, and domestically. Thats changed. Women now have all the same rights, work to make their own money, and arent expected to be submissive to their husbands. In fact we are seeing a shift whe…
/r/MensRights28/10/20 03:02 AM
17

Same. I have more time played on mw2 multiplayer than any other console game. Remastered multiplayer wouldve been great.
/r/MGTOW26/10/20 02:49 AM
57

Hard to tell but I think its MW2 remastered campaign.
/r/MGTOW26/10/20 02:25 AM
10

Nothing, vice is just catering to their audience with nonsensical claims that sound appealing to them.
/r/AntiFeminists23/10/20 07:49 AM
1

Its hilarious that you think you are winning this debate. It'd be nice if you'd just address my single point from the very beginning I have addressed them. Anyone reading our discussion can see that. Claiming otherwise seems like nothing more than a desperate, last resort attempt to look like you are winning the argument. Where in the study does it support this theory of yours? The fact that there is strong correlational data between these two factors, correlational data that is likely causal (f…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 09:53 PM
1

No, not in this case. The study you linked sheds no light as to why this phenomenon exists Right, because we as humans don't have everything spoon fed to us. We have to then do our own digging and come up with our own explanations, based on logic and any other relevant information. If you can't think on your own and need everything spoon fed to you, thats fine, but don't criticize people who dare to think beyond what's spoon fed to them. In many cases a correlation is sufficient. Not in this cas…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 08:55 PM
1

Not with anyone though, thats my point. Its not like every single woman can bang any man at any time. They are sexual selectors in that they could get sex from at least someone, but not anyone. And a lot of them REEEE when a man way out of their league rejects them, because they think standards are something women hold for men, not vice versa.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 07:56 PM
1

And in this context, that statement is complete nonsense. Your premise had nothing to do with 'probabilities' It has everything to do with probabilities. You clearly don't understand a basic scientific concept, so I'll explain it to you - After you collect data (in this case, its the study that shows a correlation between high n count and divorce), your job is to now find the best (most probable) explanation as to why. You won't shut up about how there's a "myriad of possible explanations as to …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 07:52 PM
0

Apparently not, because the study does not support your premise. You are confusing "support" with "prove." Does the study prove it? No. But the correlational results are a lot more meaningful than no correlation at all. So yes, the study does support my premise. It just doesnt prove it, because its possible that the only reason the correlation exists is because people who cant pair bond sleep around more. But is that likely the only reason? No. Whats most likely is that both are true. People who…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 09:56 AM
1

Thanks for the 8th grade science lesson, but im well aware that correlation doesnt equal causation. However, that doesnt mean that correlational data is never causal. Sure its true that people who have difficulty pair bonding are going to be less likely to want to stay in 1 relationship long term, but that doesnt mean that sleeping around has no effect on pair bonding. The more people you sleep with, the less special each person is. The more people you sleep with, the more likely you are to have…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 09:19 AM
2

A 2/10 woman is a 2/10 because she is very unattractive in ways that makeup cannot change. This is just straight up false. Makeup changes your perception of a face to see it as more attractive. Theres no magic threshold where makeup starts to work. Any woman can look better with it. . You understand what a 2/10 woman would look like? You say that as if 2/10 women are rare. Theyre not, you just dont notice them because theyre wearing makeup. Ever occurred to you that a large portion of young men …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 05:41 AM
1

I also highly doubt it is the norm for 8-10 men to fuck average women Well you should work on your observation skills. In college I know plenty of good looking guys that fucked ugly women, because they fucked almost any woman who was willing to fuck them. Aside my anecdotes, theres plenty of data to back this uo. Sexlessness in young men is rapidly increasing, but not for young women. Okcupid data shows women rated 80% of men as "below average." On tinder, women swipe right 4% of the time, while…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 04:38 AM
2

Not an exaggeration in the least bit. Have you seen a woman with no makeup compared to herself with lots of makeup? Huge difference. And yes, lots of attractive men will sleep with average looking women (whether thats before or after makeup). Some will even sleep with ugly women just cause they wanna bang as many chicks as they can.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 03:47 AM
1

Yes. Im not sure if its to the same degree as women (hypergamy makes pair bonding more difficult, which means promiscuity's effect on pair bonding could be increased by hypergamy), but its possible that it effects men just as much. But either way, it definitely effects men a lot too.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 03:42 AM
2

Yeah I agree it effects men too. Theres no reason it would only affect women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 02:13 AM
2

Your own study says it is I know what the study said. Im saying that the data from the study only goes back a few decades, which is nothing compared to human history. So to say that "this is only true recently" is dishonest. There is no evidence that human beings have evolved to stay with one person the rest of their lives. You already made this point and I already explained the fault in it. You aren't achieving anything by repeating it. Marriage is an institution that is meant to legitimize sex…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/20 12:27 AM
4

This trend is new Its not. The data doesn't go back far enough to say either way. Using marriage to measure pair bonding is also dumb, considering marriage is a social construct not biological Marriage, as in a legal contract, is a social construct. But the basis of marriage is the idea of two people staying together long term, which is absolutely not a social construct. To say that its a "social construct" for two animals (yes, humans are also animals) to stay together is ridiculous. Its not un…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/20 11:55 PM
1

Women are constantly given awards/praise for things that men wouldn't get awards/praise for. Society treats women better than men, and this is an example of it. This is absolutely a mens rights issue.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 11:35 PM
27

A violent crime against a woman is apparently the only crime appalling enough to warrant the execution of a woman.
/r/AntiFeminists21/10/20 11:23 PM
3

Did you look at the data? 0-1 is the lowest, then there is a spike for 2, then a dropdown for 3-5 (but still not nearly as low as 0-1), and then it consistently increases from there. 10+ had a much higher divorce rate and I imagine that if the data kept going (such as 20+, 50+, etc) we would keep seeing increases. The fact that there is a spike at 2 does not disprove pair bonding. 0-1 had, by far, the lowest divorce rates and 10+ had, by far, the highest divorce rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/20 11:18 PM
2

TRP isnt perfect and many men don't apply it well, either. Between those two factors, many people trying to act red pilled will make mistakes. I guarantee that he wouldn't have had that girl in the first place if he didn't know about TRP. Unless he already acted alpha before he knew about TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/20 10:46 PM
10

Hookup culture, makeup, and online dating have resulted in a world where women can sleep with men way out of their league. A literal 2/10 can put on lots of makeup, look like a 5/10, and sleep with guys that are 8+/10 because lots of hot guys just like to sleep around. This has made many women entitled. They feel like they are supposed to be the sexual selectors. That standards are something that women are supposed to have for men, not vice versa. So when women get rejected, many of them screech…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/20 10:44 PM
7

It should be common sense that sleeping around with lots of people will make it harder for you to feel long term satisfaction with one person, but I'll post some data anyway https://ifstudies.org/blog/counterintuitive-trends-in-the-link-between-premarital-sex-and-marital-stability/ Women with 0-1 previous partners were least likely to divorce. Then there was a big spike where women with exactly 2 previous partners were much more likely to divorce. Then at 3 previous partners, there was a drop of…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/20 10:42 PM
70

Big tech is censoring mens rights along with conservative opinions in general. Is it because they somehow get more money for it? Or is there something much bigger going on?
/r/MensRights21/10/20 10:29 PM
9

Username checks out Pair bonding is the ability to maintain strong love and attraction to someone long term. The more people you sleep with, the less pair bonding there will be when you finally get into an LTR. I love how blue pillers are always talking about being "pro science" but constantly say anti-scientific things just like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/20 10:27 PM
3

Imagine being so privileged that you think you can physically assault a man, then call the cops on him to get him in trouble. Good on these cops for not using the Duluth model (a policy that requires cops to arrest the man during domestic disputes, regardless of who attacked who). Pussy pass denied indeed.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/20 10:13 PM
7

Not MR, just a potentially incompetent copper who happens to be female What about the fact that she was given an award?
/r/MensRights21/10/20 06:31 PM
9

She ended up in a mental hospital from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/20 06:24 PM
1

Volcel*
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/10/20 03:19 AM
12

The thrill of a bad boy and the stability of a beta So fried ice
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/10/20 05:19 AM
21

Youtube probably told him he would be going to the gulag if he kept making fun of feminism. They demonitized his "reading simp comments" videos, so I imagine they gave him a warning for anti-feminist videos
/r/AntiFeminists20/10/20 02:46 AM
6

Lmao whats more likely? That most guys are assholes that fake being nice to get sex, or that you happen to date douchey guys (a common trait among women)? The world is full of nice guys who worship women. Women dont want to date these men because their niceness is unattractive. And you cope by saying "WELL ACKCHYALLY THEY WERENT NICE, THEY JUST PRETENDED." Also, since its purge week, Im gonna say this too - You claimed that most of the men you dated were ugly. But, in the current state of the da…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 05:58 PM
6

No, its not. Tons of men are genuinely nice, but women dont want them. And they cope by saying "hd wasnt actually nice, he was just pretending." Also, asshole Chad is way more successful than nice guy Chad, so no this isnt simply a matter of looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 04:20 PM
17

Women hate the fact that theyre attracted to men who treat them like shit and are unattracted to men who treat them well. So they make up nonsense about how "nice guys arent actually nice" because that would negate the evidence that suggests they are turned off by niceness. "Why do I friendzone every guy whose nice to me? Well, uhmm, ermm, uhh... Oh, I know. Those guys werent actually nice!" Keep coping, ladies. Youre just embarassing yourselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 11:49 AM
21

Purge week sure is bringing out the bottom of the barrel, low IQ garbage. Why do you think incels dont shower? In our hookup culture, even really ugly women can put on makeup and sleep with average looking dudes. So why would any woman settle for less? For an ugly, short man to get sex/dates, he has to have money or extreme game.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 11:32 AM
6

Lmao the "FragileMaleRedditor" subreddit is the definition of irony.
/r/MGTOW19/10/20 12:49 AM
27

Well ackchyually sweaty there are more male CEO's, therefore men can't be victims.
/r/MensRights19/10/20 12:47 AM
132

Feminists/SJWs: crickets
/r/AntiFeminists19/10/20 12:27 AM
3

The longer you stay, the more shes gonna get. Start talking to lawyers ASAP.
/r/MGTOW219/10/20 12:21 AM
38

When you say single you have money to buy what you want, with plenty left over for things like investing and early retirement. Stay single indeed.
/r/MGTOW19/10/20 12:20 AM
7

In a mad world, only the mad are sane
/r/MGTOW19/10/20 12:17 AM
11

They think its unnecessary because the "right man" won't need it. He will be able to make them orgasm without them doing anything. Just like how the "right man" will be tall, rich, handsome and treat her like a queen.
/r/AntiFeminists18/10/20 02:09 PM
70

Promiscuity has no negative effects on relationships - women and simps
/r/MGTOW17/10/20 03:44 PM
2

I was saying her intended meaning, I highly doubt that's what she meant ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/20 04:57 AM
2

Why is there an "/s" at the end of your comment?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/20 04:28 AM
1

Mental health awareness Translation: I want men to put up with my bullshit She's not dating guys who have mental health problems, she just wants guys to accept her problems.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/10/20 03:04 PM
625

If a husband paid more for expenses and asked for his wife to repay him, most people would think he's being ridiculous. Most people expect the husband to pay more. But when a woman complains about out earning her husband, she is showered with validation from other women and simps about how he's a deadbeat.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 02:33 PM
11

Too bad society doesn't agree with him. Women get much lighter sentences for the same crime.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/20 02:23 PM
23

Lmao all the simps and women will read this and say "See? Look how unrealistic mgtow is!", completely clueless to the perfect analogy you just made.
/r/MGTOW15/10/20 02:06 PM
8

Janitor wasnt the best example. How about garbage collectors and sewage workers? Any feminists demanding more female representation there.
/r/MGTOW14/10/20 06:08 PM
72

What am I doing wrong? Well, if you were willing to date a man who wasn't a 6'4 millionaire Chad, you might have some luck.
/r/MGTOW14/10/20 03:43 PM
5

It used to mean "someone who can't get sex despite all efforts", now it means "any man that doesn't worship women."
/r/MGTOW214/10/20 03:34 PM
48

Its amazing that people think modern feminism is about equality when feminists make it so obvious that they don't want equality. They are always talking about more woman CEOs, engineers, scientists etc but never talk about more woman janitors. They don't truly want to end gender roles, because they still want men to do the shit jobs like garbage collectors. They want women in high status jobs. They are so mask-off about their female supremacy but people still think feminism is about equality.
/r/MGTOW14/10/20 03:28 PM
10

They all sound like a broken record. Its the same shit over and over again. "Patriarchy hurts both men and women!" "Men cant show weakness only because of other men" "If we just got rid of the patriarchy, all gendered issues would disappear" etc. As if all the problems in the world are caused by men. As if women aren't judgmental of emotional weakness in men. These people seem to think that the patriarchy just came out of thin air. No, there's a reason that so many past societies and major relig…
/r/MensRights14/10/20 02:52 PM
16

A rich woman? She'll get 6 months probation.
/r/MGTOW14/10/20 02:23 PM
12

I would love to see feminists have to live as a non-attractive man for a month. Their entire world would be turned upside down.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/20 04:01 PM
83

The thing about feminism is that it never ends. Once all the problems are solved, it makes up new problems because thats the only way to keep the movement alive. Individual ideas within feminism (like toxic masculinity) also never end. First toxic masculinity just means "male gender roles that are harmful to men", and now it means "any man who doesn't want to act extremely feminine."
/r/MensRights13/10/20 03:58 PM
39

Its amazing how these middle age, ugly, fat women have this endless list of demands and they actually think the men who meet those requirements would want to date them. They want a tall, handsome, rich guy with a big dick who spends tons of money on them. While they offer literally nothing.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/20 03:55 PM
45

Mainstream body positivity was never about actual body positivity, such as being more accepting of disfigured people. It was about trying to convince top men to sleep with fat women.
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/20 03:50 PM
2

Already there lol
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/20 06:03 PM
8

I'm not left wing (I'm independent/centrist) but I'm subbed here because I think most content is pretty good. With that being said, I'm curious about what you guys think of this, since most of you are leftists - To me, it seems like as left becomes more popular, its changing for the bad. Theyre going from anti-censorship to pro censorship. Theyre going from "we have an unconscious bias that favors white people" to "white people are trash." In particular, one thing I've noticed is that many lefts…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/20 04:29 PM
6

MRA troll alert Cringe this troll argued on this sub that gender pay gap is same as flat Earth, both debunked by science. I love how radical liberals/feminists always claim that science is on their side. Its like they have no argument so they just blatantly claim that science is on their side (without evidence, of course) and hope that people believe it.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 03:48 PM
8

First off, "was married" implies she no longer is. What exactly happened? Exactly. She doesn't see the irony in the fact that shes divorced (at least once) and shes talking about how her ability to pair bond wasn't effected by her promiscuity. Second, her phrasing does not mention her husband in particular, making it easily possible that she was married more than once Good observation. People try to cleverly use language to "technically tell the truth" while also being misleading. She never said…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/10/20 03:43 PM
186

She unintentionally admitted that she was the problem. When a man is with someone who works with him and makes him feel welcome, his communication is great. When he is with someone judgmental and argumentative, his communication disappears. Shes so close yet so far away from self awareness.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/10/20 12:23 AM
2

The cycle of periods is predictable enough that you should be prepaired. Although I dont oppose tampons being put into bathrooms. They probably should be. But that post on twox is still pretty idiotic. Toilet paper isnt free.
/r/MensRights07/10/20 12:16 AM
65

The most ironic thing about blue pillers is they think they are on the "right side of history."
/r/TheRedPill06/10/20 02:46 PM
179

Red pill wisdom is as old as civilization, but it is much more popular in some historical periods than others. Humans go through this cycle: Harsh times lead to the red pill The red pill leads to good times Good times leads to forgetting the red pill Forgetting the red pill leads to harsh times Human nature results in women all sleeping with the alpha males (harsh times). This leads to people becoming red pilled and acting accordingly (creating a patriarchal, monogamous society). This leads to g…
/r/TheRedPill06/10/20 02:11 PM
34

Bet they haven't had sex since
/r/MGTOW06/10/20 01:53 PM
4

they want someone who gives her the excitement of Chad with the stability of Billy. They want an alphabux. They want fried ice. Perfectly summed up. You are a poet.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/10/20 10:50 PM
12

I can say hateful, offensive things about men and it doesnt count because there are more male CEOs
/r/MensRights05/10/20 12:44 PM
36

I can say hateful, offensive things about men and it doesnt count because there are more male CEOs Woke people are a great source of comedy. It sounds like theyre being satirical, even though theyre not. Still funny though.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 09:16 PM
1

Still no arguments. We are done here. Have a nice life. Remember, if you actually want to lose your virginity, you have to stop worshipping women.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 08:18 PM
1

Still no argument. I made valid points in that other comment with that feminist. You disagree, you think theyre wrong. If my points are so wrong, why cant you explain why any of those points are wrong? You said "its pseudoscience" and "you dont understand what youre talking about." Thats not explaining why a point is wrong. Its a baseless claim. You are saying that my argument is obviously wrong, yet you cant actually explain why, despite all the comments youve made. And dont give me any crap ab…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 07:56 PM
1

All that text and still no argument. I made a claim in a sub that generally agrees with the claim. You went out of your way to come to this sub and disagree with people. Its not like you just posted a comment in response to OP, you are replying to comments and disagreeing with them. However, youre not giving arguments. Youre insulting people and telling them to read. When I pointed this out, you admitted you werent giving arguments, because you said "I dont need to give an argument, theres no ar…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 07:42 PM
49

Other woman and simps are like 70% of the population.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/10/20 07:22 PM
1

Im not trying to insult you by calling you a virgin. Im making a specific point, which is - You seem to think youre an expert on women, and surely you reject ideas like the red pill. You are nice to women and fight for their rights, and yet youre still a virgin. You dont find that strange? You dont know women nearly as much as you think you do. I sincerely doubt that. It reads like a reddit atheist going "Oh yeah I know the bible" where he went through and underlined all the things he doesn't li…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 07:11 PM
1

Thats what I was looking for. Thanks man. That other stuff you sent was good too.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 07:00 PM
1

There's nothing wrong with virginity I didnt say there was. But women are sexually repulsed by white knights like yourself. So its obvious youre a virgin and if you want to lose your virginity, you should stop white knighting. You aren't just "looking at men's issues too," you're pitting them against women's rights. I never did that. Again, you are the one who thinks that equality feels like oppression. You think that addressing male issues = oppressing women. You do need to read up on things, y…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 04:32 PM
1

You're the one who posts in incel subs, don't project based on your hangups. Im not a virgin, unlike you. Not that this is about sex. It's about understanding and empathizing with half the population, not just looking inwardly. So because I posted about mens issues, it means I hate women? Really ironic that you keep saying "to the privileged, equality feels like oppression", because thats exactly how you feel. You feel like actual equality (looking at mens issues too) is oppressive to women. The…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 04:08 PM
1

Please send me the study about how not participating in benevolent sexism was perceived as hostile sexism. I was literally just thinking about it yesterday but I couldnt find it. I want to save it so I have it as reference.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 03:48 PM
3

Youve made so many comments trying to prove us wrong and you still havent given a single argument. All youve done is make baseless insults and tell us we need to go read more. You arent going to lose your virginity by white knightning online. Give it a rest.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 03:45 PM
3

You didn't make anything to counter I clearly did. I made a claim (not an attack or anything like that), and you havent addressed that claim. You said its wrong, but gave no reason. You just said that I "need to read more" and a bunch of other nonsense. You made a "because I say so" argument No. Ironically, thats exactly what youve done. Its interesting that psychological projection is so common when it comes to fallicious arguments. Not that it matters - I'm not here to debate deluded people. Y…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 03:31 PM
2

It's about the child rights. A kids has a right to the same opportunity as other kids. Unless the mother wants to abort the kid first? Lmao
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 02:30 PM
5

Wow, all that text and still no argument. You are the one coming into this sub and commenting in response to me. Its on you to make an initial counter argument. Btw, someone else gave an actual argument so I gave one back. Since youve gone through my post history (lmao btw), go back there and look at the long comment I made just before this one.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 02:27 PM
2

Evolution
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 01:58 PM
4

You didnt make an argument, just baseless claims. Ironic that youre telling me that I live in a bubble when thats exactly how sjws live. Ignoring and censoring valid arguments that they cant rebuttal.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 01:56 PM
339

Because most women, and many men, believe that society needs to cater to women. They see men as disposable and women as needing protection.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 09:59 AM
6

So many cops and other authority figures constantly give women passes on things. Its systematic, like woman receiving significantly lighter sentences for the same crimes.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 02:17 PM
14

Lmao what a weird way to complain that tampons aren't free. Spoiler alert, Einstein, your comparison is ridiculous. Toilet paper still costs money. Its only free in public restrooms because needing to shit happens randomly, unlike a period, and we dont want people walking around smelling like shit.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 02:13 PM
74

A good portion its of users are "virgin but not incel" men.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/10/20 07:01 PM
3

What obvious exceptions?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/20 09:26 PM
24

Then hes called a misogynist.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/09/20 05:17 PM
29

It’s important that guys know that there is no concurrence between what women and say and what they do There is a concurrence, because their behavior usually contradicts what they say, regarding relationships.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/09/20 04:41 PM
17

What are you talking about? The red pill is constantly pointing out the flaws of men and explaining how men can change them. The red pill is all about acknowledging flaws in men and fixing them. Racking up a high n-count doesn’t mean they’re more likely to cheat This is just blatantly false. Whether its causal, correlational, or both, it is true that promiscuous women are more likely to cheat on/leave their boyfriends/husbands. Even the old trope of men aging better than women is rooted in Men A…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/20 04:01 PM
27

Spot on, sir
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/09/20 03:55 PM
140

She wont date the nice guy because the niceness is a turnoff. But she wont admit that, so instead she says "youre not entitled to my body." I mean its true, but it doesnt address the fact that she likes guys who treat her terribly. Humans, especially women, use clever language to justify their nonsense.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/09/20 03:24 PM
13

Yes, because that quote states "but not that much." Looks, money, and status (perceived or real) is almost everything. The idea that they dont matter "that much" is blue pilled. Perceived social status, looks, and money are the 3 biggest factors regarding attraction. Those 3 alone outweigh everything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/20 02:42 PM
7

Most people dont put in time and effort for long term benefit. They'd rather do the work they have to do, then go have fun. For many men, this means spending money on women with the hopes of getting laid. If they cared more about their future, they would do things like work overtime instead of simping.
/r/MGTOW229/09/20 02:24 PM
7

Oh how silly of me. I forgot that women also put on makeup when theyre home alone. Thats what they do, right?
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/20 02:20 PM
4

She wont date the nice guy because the niceness is a turnoff. But she wont admit that, so instead she says "youre not entitled to my body." I mean its true, but it doesnt address the fact that she likes guys who treat her terribly. Humans, especially women, use clever language to justify their nonsense.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/09/20 02:19 PM
16

Its unsafe for them to go for a walk in the park, but safe for them to go to dinner? Safety isn't the issue. She just wants this guy to buy her a meal.
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/20 02:12 PM
12

Feminists put on makeup to look them look sexy, while complaining about how society sexualizes women. Most people take them seriously. Clown world
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/20 02:03 PM
27

I need someone to treat me right, unlike all the other ******** I dated. She has a guy best friend that treats her right, and hes in the friendzone. Zero self awareness.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/09/20 01:58 PM
15

I'd bet any amount of money that if a woman was posting fitness pics, the promotion wouldn't have been denied. Clown world
/r/MGTOW29/09/20 01:56 PM
5

Most men arent thinking like this. They arent thinking "since she has a high n count, shes very experienced and used to good dick, so Im not gonna perform well." Men dislike high n counts because we are evolutionarily programmed to dislike it. A woman who has had a lot of mates is far more likely to either cheat or leave you for a new mate. Her history proves it. She cant stay with just one guy long term.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/20 01:54 PM
14

There are a lot of unpleasant truths about human nature. A few of these truths are about female attraction and behavior. Women care about status and looks much more than most people realize. Women are also much more opportunistic than people realize (like using beta males for money while fucking an alpha). The denial of these truths is the bluepill. The recognition of these truths is the redpill.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/20 01:48 PM
107

Love the last simp at the end going "you can't do that bro" Simps are beyond pathetic
/r/PussyPassDenied27/09/20 11:02 AM
8

Any comment that criticizes women in any way is smeared as "misogyny" by a growing number of people. Same for any comment about mens rights. The mens rights movement is already heavily censored and smeared by the media. Now, we are moving from censorship to illegality. How long before we get thrown into the gulag?
/r/MensRights26/09/20 08:15 PM
13

Censorship is what happens when people cant refute ideas
/r/MensRights26/09/20 02:45 PM
5

https://www.reddit.com/r/trashy/comments/87xodl/guy_works_12_hours_a_day_to_come_home_and_see/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share
/r/MGTOW225/09/20 11:23 PM
25

https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/960143-feminism That is the most relevant meme Ive ever seen
/r/MGTOW23/09/20 04:24 AM
7

A self-admitted parasite with pride instead of shame, lmao
/r/AntiFeminists22/09/20 02:20 AM
44

Shes probably so used to simps worshipping her that this was a huge reality check. Although, she probably stopped thinking about it 5 minutes later when some other simp actually paid for her nudes.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/20 02:10 AM
9

Shes trying to say "no girl, you don't suck, its all the men that suck", because that kind of feel-good nonsense gets them views.
/r/MGTOW22/09/20 01:59 AM
15

Because the narritive is that incels are angry white men. Its false, but it fits their "white men suck" idpol bullshit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/20 12:09 AM
28

Women are already advantaged in the dating world. Even an ugly woman can put on makeup, look decent, and date/hook up with attractive men. Women complaining that mens standards are too high sounds like the apex fallacy. When she says "men need to lower their standards", what shes really saying is "the men Im interested in need to lower their standards." These men being the most attractive/high status men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/20 08:21 PM
3

Its better than nothing. At least someone besides us is saying something, even if its for selfish reasons.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 08:15 PM
96

When men are even just maybe advantaged in any way, feminists never shut up about it. But they'll totally ignore all of the ways in which women are advantaged. Actually they won't ignore it, they'll defend it. When men speak up about things like unfair family courts, feminists smear them as misogynists.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/20 03:31 PM
8

Uh, because no female ever wants an actual relationship or companionship. No, I didnt say that. Most women do want a relationship, but the alpha males that they desire a relationship with dont want to commit. When it comes to marriage, most women are forced to settle for men that arent ideal. They want to marry an alpha Chad, but alpha Chad doesnt want to commit to them. So they decide to settle and marry a beta. When they do, the sex becomes rare. I’m sorry women have used you for money, or wha…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 10:17 PM
33

You are right about everything except this one line- It would suggest you really aren’t interested in something serious with me long term Nope, exactly the opposite. The guys that have to wait for sex are the beta buxx that shes interested in long term. The guy that fucks her right away is the alpha fucks. She wants a long term relationship from the beta buxx, but it will be a sexless, one sided relationship where shes really just using him for resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 02:43 PM
22

Youre either an outlier or full of shit. Some people are just absolute dumpster fires We arent interested in hearing "only the trashy women are attracted to jerks, most of us arent like that!" Go preach your bluepilled stuff elsewhere.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/09/20 06:59 AM
100

Indeed. What will feminists say about this? Crickets
/r/MensRights18/09/20 12:25 AM
11

I despise censorship, but I dont really care if mods from crazy subs decide to ban people from their own sub. The problem is when other subs start getting banned/quarantined for wrongthink. I couldn't care less about being banned from FDS, despite no rule breaking. But being banned from reddit even without rule breaking? That some horseshit.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/20 04:59 PM
0

I agree with you that divorce courts are unfair towards men. Men should get custody as much as women do, but they dont because the courts are biased. Our legal system is really screwed up and men get the short end of the stick. But, its still true that alimony is sometimes justified.
/r/AntiFeminists14/09/20 04:06 AM
13

It really depends on the circumstances. If a woman gives up her career to be a stay at home mom, and after her divorce she can only get minimum wage jobs, then yeah she should get some alimony. If she had worked instead, she would very likely have a much higher paying job. But if two people get married and the woman keeps her job, then yeah theres no reason for the guy to pay alimony once they divorce.
/r/AntiFeminists13/09/20 12:46 PM
11

No they see it as pathetic, just like everything else simps do.
/r/MensRights11/09/20 06:19 PM
11

Dreams are very strange and symbolic. Dreaming of banging billie eilish could be mostly random and have no significant meaning. It could also be symbolic of the fact that you want to bang "popular" girls that you dont respect. Lots of men fantisize about banging hot, low IQ "preppy" girls like cheerleaders. If you have a "psychological conflict" where the girls you want to bang arent girls that youd want to date, then a dream about banging billie eilish may just be a symbolic representation of t…
/r/MGTOW211/09/20 03:18 PM
69

My first GF was suicidal at 16 and her dad gave her a gun and told her to stop being a pussy. That obviously didnt happen. Why do simps love to make shit up? When twitch had those sexual allegations going on, simps photoshopped faked screenshots of girls texting them about their assault. A girl would make up a false claim (as proven by the men she accused) and simps would photoshop screenshots of texts of those girls to make their stories more credible. For example, one guy photoshopped a screen…
/r/MensRights11/09/20 02:52 PM
4

Yes, you are right. That slipped my mind when I made my other comment.
/r/MGTOW11/09/20 01:59 PM
9

You are right. Theyve wanted rights without responsibility. If they truly cared about equality in the beginning, they would've happily accepted responsibilities along with their rights. But they didnt, they wanted the rights (being able to vote) without the responsibilities (being potentially drafted for war).
/r/MGTOW11/09/20 01:53 PM
8

Thats a great point. Since the beginning of feminism, they have demanded rights without responsibilities. They wanted to vote, but didn't want to get drafted. They wanted to work, but still wanted men to be providers. You are right. Since its roots, its been a supremacy movement.
/r/MGTOW11/09/20 01:52 PM
0

I think it was about equality when women still couldnt vote and had difficulty getting jobs. But yeah, once those were changed, feminism became about superiority.
/r/MGTOW11/09/20 01:34 PM
28

You wont hear a peep out of feminists on this one. So much for equality.
/r/MGTOW11/09/20 01:21 PM
59

Isnt it funny how places like Canada, which are supposedly all about "gender equality", still have these traditional, gynocentric laws where money is unfairly redistributed from men to women? They dont care about equality. They care about women. When women are behind (like less women in STEM), they make laws to push women up (affirmative action), under the disguise of equality. But when women are ahead, they make sure women stay ahead, cause "patriarchy" and "oppression." Clown world
/r/MensRights11/09/20 01:17 PM
11

Men are falling behind, women most affected
/r/MensRights11/09/20 03:35 AM
34

girls will say "female privilege doesn't exist" Exactly. Male privilege exists, but so does female privilege. Each gender has their own advantages and disadvantages. However, women seem to have more advantages and men seem to have more disadvantages. Funny sidenote, most of the people who complain about "women not being able to walk alone at night" are anti-gun. Which is hilarious because guns solve that problem. Armed women arent vulnerable to attackers in the same way that unarmed women are. B…
/r/MGTOW09/09/20 10:10 PM
10

Yeah. For so long, he just tried to back away from the situation. Blocking her punches without hitting back. Nobody tried to stop her and sge just kept going. But once he decides to throw her down, everyone rushes in. Many people dont are about female on male violence. Some think its funny. Its ridiculous.
/r/MensRights09/09/20 07:10 AM
5

I gave you valid criticism of your religious beliefs and your response is to ignore my points and talk about irrelevant things. Dude, anybody can have any dealbreakers they want. I didnt say that you need to be willing to date atheists. I just gave a valid criticism of your religion. A criticism that you refuse to address. If you want to continue this conversation, address the points I made.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 04:13 PM
7

Why do atheists try to play gotcha games? Becauae religion is heavily flawed. So if you are going to claim you are religious, and that atheism is a dealbreaker, youre going to recieve criticism. I'm catholic because it's the one religion that God talks to me and calls me to No, its because catholicism is the religion of your culture. Do you really think that if you were born in the middle east, youd go against the islamic culture and decide to be catholic?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 03:56 PM
3

Why arent you jewish, islamic, hindu, or any other religion?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 03:35 PM
1

You are Christian?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 03:19 PM
2

I agreed with your list up until atheist. Whats wrong with atheists?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/20 03:12 PM
4

Im politically independent and probably always will be, but the direction that the left is heading is just driving me (and many people) further away from thd left. The left from 50 years ago is radically different from today. They went from anti-censorship to pro-censorship. They became anti-science (whenever science disagrees with their dogma, such as the idea that there are differences betweens genders, they smear it as pseudoscience, even when its not). They went from acknowledging white priv…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/20 04:10 AM
1

Maybe I was misunderstanding OP. To me, it sounded like he was saying "Christina Hoff Sommers has done good work for mens rights, but she works for a right wing company, so Im not sure what to think of her." As if her working for a right wing company makes her bad. My point is that modern leftists have forced people like her to work for right wing companies because they are so intolerant of anyone who disagrees with their dogma. She is hated among leftists just because she talks about mens issue…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/20 03:58 AM
3

Good point. However its important to acknowledge that the left is changing a lot.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/20 03:53 AM
23

Im not left wing, but I follow this subreddit because I think most of the content here is pretty good. Im not an expert on Christina Hoff Sommers, but it seems like she is a reasonable feminist who also cares about male issues. The fact that she cares about male issues has given her a bad reputation among leftists. This shows that many modern leftists aren't interested in true equality, theyre interested in the pissing content that is identity politics. This is what I dislike about modern leftis…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/20 08:48 PM
2

This is evidence that theyre using the term "sexual assault" very loosely. If someone doesnt "realize" they were sexually assaulted until years later, its probably because it wasnt real assault. Something like having drunk sex at a party, then years later deciding that it was rape because she agreed with feminists that alcohol means she cant consent (but the guy can).
/r/MGTOW203/09/20 02:50 PM
1

Short term yes, long term no
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/20 07:15 PM
1

I support it for one specific reason - the fact that many jobs will be lost due to technology. In the future, we will need UBI because too many jobs will be performed by our technological advancements, like AI. But aside that? No, I dont think UBI is a good idea. Money is relative. A million dollars is a lot of money only because most people dont have it. If everyone had millions of dollars, millions of dollars wouldnt be worth much. Humans have a finite amount of resources and we use money to m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/20 04:58 PM
49

"Really just looking for someone to vibe with" Room temp IQ
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/09/20 05:31 AM
3

Oh, the irony
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/20 04:39 AM
21

Mgtow is still only a small minority of men. For every 1 mgtow, theres 20 simps. Women arent worried about losing their betabuxx to mgtow. They hate mgtow because mgtow implies that women arent worth the trouble when it comes to relationships. Thats why they hate it. Theyre offended that some men think theyre not worth it.
/r/MGTOW228/08/20 08:56 PM
1

Get your eyes checked
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/20 05:23 PM
14

Lmao imagine being so braindead and that you get turned-off over something as insignificant as 2 monitors. 2 monitors actually makes things easier, depending on what youre doing on the computer. As OP said, she doesnt know anything about technology aside the latest iphone. Which is funny, because the iphone was made by the type of guys who would use 2 monitors. Women love making fun of the men who have made their lives so much better.
/r/MGTOW26/08/20 02:08 PM
2

You asked for the MGTOW perspective and someone gave it to you. You didnt respond to that comment, despite responding to most comments. Are you hear for real answers? Or are you hear to get validation from nonsense answers? "He just doesnt wanna commit", "hes not the type of guy who wants to be tied down long term" etc are all nonsense answers, but they make you feel better. Go post on other subs if you want validation, which it seems like you do, since youre ignoring the responses that give you…
/r/MGTOW226/08/20 01:50 PM
6

This is the best answer and its one of the few answers she didnt respond to. OP doesnt wanna hear the truth, she wants to hear some nonsense that validates her feelings. "Its just his personal preference", "hes not the type of guy who wants to be locked down longterm" etc. This is just a validation post from a woman whose mad that Chad doesnt want to commit.
/r/MGTOW226/08/20 01:45 PM
7

has a provider/beneficiary gap ever been quantified? Probably, but the results never got popularized. People don't like hearing that women are advantaged in some ways.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/20 01:25 AM
10

I understand that was part of your claim, but your main claim was that male "red pillers" are narcissists and their strategy only works on women with BPD. This is simply not true. Most women are attracted to red pill strategies. Its also not true that most women are undiagnosed BPD. The validity of BPD is questionable because its so vague. Its like horoscopes. It says somewhat vague things that can apply to most people in some way. Heres the definition I found - Symptoms include emotional instab…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/20 01:05 AM
25

TRP is a sexual strategy for narcissists No, its a strategy for anyone. The red pill is just an idea, and idea with a lot of truth to it. Anyone can apply it. However, its much easier for a narcissist to apply it than a genuinely nice person. There are lots of kind/submissive people who wouldn't apply red pill theory, even if they thought it worked. to have sex with females with borderline personality disorder You think that the red pill only works on women with BPD? No, red pill principles appl…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/20 12:53 AM
14

Good to hear that things worked out. Unfortunately, most men who get falsely accused aren't that lucky. Even if they dont go to prison, their lives are still ruined. Fired, friends/family cutting them out, etc.
/r/MensRights26/08/20 12:04 AM
7

Are you surprised? Clearly, the artist of this cartoon worships women. Those type of men are cucks, literally and figuratively.
/r/MGTOW25/08/20 11:57 PM
0

Pursuing education/careers is fine as long as its not interrupting other things. High value men want attractive, kind, loyal women who will give him lots of sex. They dont need someone with a phd or someone who spends all day in board meetings. To clarify this point, lets look at two hypothetical women- Woman 1 is an average looking, snobby, high maintance women who has a prestigious job in the board of directors and has lots money. Woman 2 is an attractive, kind, low maintainence woman with a l…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/20 03:46 AM
25

Can you spell? Lmao she dated so many bad boy losers who couldnt spell that she felt it was necessary to make spelling her second requirement.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/08/20 09:39 PM
10

Idk man I kinda like being able to vote lol. What does this have to do with what I said? I didnt say that women werent ever oppressed. I said that women were treated as more than just sex objects. People love exaggerating about how women were seen as nothing more than sex objects. Men also had their gender roles. Expecting to provide, to sacrifice himself if there was danger, to go off to war and die. Is that misandry? Or is it a 1 way street where gender roles were misogyny, but not misandry? A…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/20 05:04 PM
10

When was this era you speak of? Women had traditional gender roles, like cooking. People could make compliments about that kind of stuff. So when was this supposed era where the only way to compliment a woman was based on looks? And what does any of this have to do with the women are wonderful effect? Both men and women see women in a more positive way. That not misogyny. Its the fact that women have an in group bias and men are mixed between an in group bias and out of group bias. Look at the 3…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/20 04:43 PM
7

Maybe shes lying, but there really are some simps who would do this.
/r/MGTOW23/08/20 01:37 AM
2

Like, in your mind you have to rat race and strive to be like the CEO because you wouldn’t be comfortable enough as a unique individual working as a janitor and use that as your example of high value/ low value man. When did I mention anything about me becoming a CEO? I simply explained part of the psychology of female attraction. For some reason, you are making this personal.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/20 03:10 PM
0

If there are more woman then men, that should help men get sex/girlfriends because women are competing for men. So the fact that men were historically outnumbered, yet its still true that the top men got all the sex, means that the hypergamy problem is even worse than originally thought, not better.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 09:42 PM
0

Lets be very clear about what happened. First, OP made a post asking for ideas about why so many women say they want male vulnerability, but are actually disgusted by it. I made an argument and backed it up. Not with studies, but studies arent the only way to support a claim. Then you came along, refused to address any of the points I made, and said my entire comment was invalid because I didnt give any sources. I explained that we are on an internet forum where open discussion is welcomed. Not …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/20 09:24 PM
1

You are saying that the claim is invalid because I didnt give sources. Not because its actually invalid, but because you dont have another argument. When someone states something incorrect, and you understand why its wrong, do you simply just point out a lack of sources, or do you actually explain why theyre wrong? A reasonable person wouod explain why, not just lazily point out a lack of sources. Unless they couldnt explain what is wrong about it, which is what we are seeing here. You are tryin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/20 04:19 PM
1

Science doesnt have a monopoly on ideas. You dont get to just label something as scientific, and say that it therefore requires sources. The bottom line here is your only argument is "you dont have sources." I explained why sources arent necessary for everything. You yourself make tons of other arguments and claims on reddit without giving sources. So now youre trying to say that my claim is strictly a science one, and therefore needs sources. Because you dont have an actual argument.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/20 02:42 PM
0

Yet another lie, I always provide sources when asked, you clearly don't. I didnt say "provide sources when asked", I said "provided sources." You said that any claim needs to be backed up by sources, but you constantly make claims without giving sources. Why are you lying about your post history? We are on a public forum where anyone can see your post history. You constantly make claims without providing sources. But whenever someone else makes a claim without sources, you tell them that their a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/20 06:38 PM
-2

I totally agree with you that society has a toxic attitude towards men, where its "damned if you do, damned if you dont". If they stick up for themselves, theyre "abusive." If they dont, theyre "pushovers/pussys/losers" etc. However, I think in this situation, he is a pushover and the criticism is valid. His wife is a terrible mother and he isnt doing much to protect his sons from her abuse. If he had done more to stop her abuse, there would be plenty of idiots calling him the abuser instead, bu…
/r/MensRights20/08/20 04:47 PM
-1

Why wouldnt you date men shorter than you or the same height as you?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/20 04:19 PM
39

At least the comments are supporting him and criticizing his wife. Im pleasantly surprised by that.
/r/MensRights20/08/20 02:30 PM
2

Can you be more clear about what you already know and what examples youre looking for?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/20 02:24 PM
1

It's because you're the one making the claim? I made a claim and I backed it up. I didnt link studies, but linking studies isnt the only way to back up a claim. Giving arguments, for example, is another way of backing up a claim, and thats what I did. You still havent addressed the arguments. You also didnt back up your claim. You responded to me by saying "nah, thats pseudoscience", without backing up your claim that it was pseudoscience. The funny thing is that my original argument wasnt even …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/20 02:24 PM
6

If an equally qualified man and woman apply to the same STEM job, the woman is much more likely to be hired. This is because of diversity quotas and the "women are wonderful" effect.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/20 07:58 PM
1

Except pointing out the fact that it isn't scientific, as in not true, is an argument No its not, its a claim. You didnt back up your claim that its unscientific. You simply claimed "its unscientific" without any supporting arguments or studies. Talking out of your ass by claiming something is biological or someone is hardwired that way with zero proof Once again, you make this claim without backing it up. Try giving an actual argument as to why my original claim is wrong. You don't like being c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/20 06:13 PM
2

The average man is most successful with women around 35-45 because they usually have more money and status, and their looks havent reached "old person" yet. Plus, women around that age are losing their looks snd are seeking a stable provider instead of a bad boy. Obviously a hot alpha is going to have more success at 20 than 40. But the average man peaks around 40, regarding his ability to get women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/20 04:11 AM
0

Why is the response to this always "its not scientific" instead of an actual argument? It is scientific. Its evo psych. Although its hard to find studies that potray women in a negative way, so there arent many popular studies that support the "attraction to status" theory. There is a study to back this up - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bjop.12463 If you want to debate this, give an actual argument instead of just mindlessly repeating "its just pseudoscience."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/20 11:53 PM
8

This is a pretty good one sentence summary. Heres the more in depth explanation - Women are evolutionarily programmed to be turned off by weakness. They are attracted to the most powerful males (socially and physically) and unattracted to the weak males (again, both physically and socially). There are certain traits that are common in strong/dominant men and other trains common in weak/low status men. The strong/dominant men were usually confident, more aggressive, brave, etc. The weak/low statu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/20 03:38 PM
1

It’s not an additional reason. It’s either a complete non-factor, or you’re admitting there’s merit to disparate impact theory. Of course theres merit to it, its just a matter of whether or not there are more important factors. I dont want more qualified man being rejected for a job, just so that a less qualified woman can be hired in the name of "equality" or "diversity." But if something is neutral, except for the fact that it massively, dispropprtionally effects 1 gender (in a negative way), …
/r/PussyPass14/08/20 07:25 PM
1

Stop with the false equivalencies. I dont care if men are "under represented" in nursing, babysitting, or any other field where women are biologically advantaged. 90% of nurses are women? Great, keep it that way. I dont want affirmative action to make nursing 50% male. What I do care about is policies/cultural norms that explicity benefit women and harm men, under the false pretense of "equality." Im not disagreeing with "whoever invites, pays" based on the idea that "its unfair to men." Im disa…
/r/PussyPass14/08/20 07:01 PM
1

If you’re fine with statistical differences why would it matter if men paid significantly more often so long as no individual man was ever forced to pay? Because the idea that "whoever invites, pays" is stupid in the first place. Theres no good reason for it, and it dispropprtionally effects men. The idea of whoever invites, pays is a pretty traditional way to do things Thats a terrible argument. You don’t charge people for food when they come to your home, do you? Because its shitty and cheap t…
/r/PussyPass14/08/20 06:11 PM
1

As such you should support gender and racial quotas in hiring as well since those are the only way to override the natural differences between groups No, because Im fine with their being statistical differences among race and gender. if you view the world though the lens of groups defined by their group characteristics rather than individuals making choices you get to support all sorts of fun things. Once again, you are literally ignoring the fact that men are usually the ones who ask for dates,…
/r/PussyPass14/08/20 05:42 PM
4

Your argument ignores the fact that men are biologically and socially conditioned to be the ones to ask. An overwhelming majority of the time, its the man asking. So your claim that its "gender neutral" is total bullshit. True equality is either splitting the bill or each person pays for themselves. Why should the person who asks for the date pay for all of it? It takes 2 to tangle. If you accept the invitation because you are interested as well, pay for your own shit. If you dont wanna, then ju…
/r/PussyPass14/08/20 11:51 AM
8

If she gets pregnant, he will be paying child support when he turns 18.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 02:22 PM
33

The virus is primarily spread through peoples breath. It effects the lungs and droplets of it come out every time an infected person breathes. When you wear a mask, you heavily limit the travel distance of your breath. Wearing a mask doesnt stop you from getting infected, it stops you from infecting others, because wearing a mask means your breath isnt traveling far and thus the covid droplets in your breath arent spreading much.
/r/MGTOW13/08/20 02:39 AM
1

Those bloggers only make money because theres enough women who think that way and feel validated by readimg the article. Its not just the bloggers, its the bloggers catering to a wide audience.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/08/20 02:47 AM
5

Bingo. One of the biggest mistakes that women make is assuming that men want the same thing as them. We dont. Lets look at two hypothetical women. A smart, attractive, polite girl who still lives at home, doesnt have much money, doesnt have a good job or education, etc. An average looking, average intelligence girl with tons of money and a great career. Me, and I think most men, would highly prefer to date woman 1 over woman 2.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 02:11 AM
2

To be completely honest, the only men that ever complain are the ones that can't/wouldn't able to date me because of them. So like 95%+ of men? And of course the men that do meet your standards arent gonna complain about the fact that they met the requirements that most men couldnt. No man I have ever dated has sat down and said to me "you have CRAZY high standards." Of course not, many of the men you dated met your standards (otherwise, why would you date them?) so theyd have nothing to complai…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 02:03 AM
485

Point 1 & 3: I’M HYPER AWARE OF EVERY SEXIST THING A GUY DOES NOW. ONE LITTLE ANTI-FEMINIST COMMENT CAN COMPLETELY TURN ME OFF. Point 4: IT’S LIKE GUYS ARE WALKING ON EGGSHELLS AROUND US. ZERO self awareness.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/08/20 02:56 PM
3

It would be harder for a 10/10 to ruin it, but it certainly could be done. In fact, since a 10/10 is expected to be confident and independent, its really creepy for a 10/10 to be needy, insecure, spineless, etc. So maybe it wouldnt be that hard for a 10/10 to be friendzoned. Since beta behavior is so unexpected from them, itd probably be really weird/creepy for them to act that way, and that alone could disqualify them as a sexual partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 03:38 AM
6

Pretty close. The only thing youre incorrect about is the idea that top tier looks makes you seen as a potential sex partner no matter what. Having really good looks means you can get away with a lot, but not everything. If you act like a spineless beta who worships women, no amount of good looks will save you. Women will not fuck men that treat them like a queen, no matter how good his looks are.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/20 02:26 AM
1

The person who kills one would likely kill more. Its very unlikely theyd kill enough to hit the same number of murders as the bomber. He'd likely go to prison long before that. Even aside that point, you think the single murder should get as much attention as the bombing just because the murderer might kill again? Furthermore, what about the bomber killing again? Your argument has more holes than swiss cheese. You dont seem interested in having an honest discussion. It seems like you just want t…
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/20 03:47 PM
1

That is the difference between us, we believe that killing one innocent soul like killing the whole world. Well thats pretty idiotic. A bombing that kills hundreds is obviously much worse than the murder of 1 person. Of course that bombing deserves more media attention than 1 murder. Bombing thousands of people in their countries then saying we are just fighting terrorism is your job. I dont support the war between the USA and the middle east.
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/20 03:33 PM
1

Hahahaha. "Right wing extremist groups carried out double the amount of terrorist attacks from 2008-2016." Thats a blatant lie, unless the definition of a "terrorist attack" is so loose that something like 1 murder is considered "terrorism." In which case, no shit that bombings got more attention than murders..
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/20 03:13 PM
2

What planet are you on? The media isnt constantly calling muslims terrorists. They report on terrorist attacks but they dont describe muslims as terrorists all the time..
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/20 02:56 PM
2

Incase it was unclear, OPs post is specifically talking about western SWJs. I can assure you that plenty of western "feminists" defend islam in irrational ways.
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/20 02:40 PM
1

That is exactly what Islam refuses. I know, did you miss my point about how their radical beliefs in intersectionality and privilege is clouding their judgment? They see muslims at the bottom of the privilege hierarchy and get so tunnel visioned from it that they defend them. Do you even use this sub or are you one of the brigaders?
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/20 02:23 PM
3

Nobody said feminism = left wing. Nobody said that all feminists love islam. But it is true that many femimists defend islam because their head is so far up their own ass with their "intersectionality" and "privilege" bullshit that they dont see the absurdity of defending islam. Ironic that you said OP was using a strawman because thats exactly what you did when you said that OP claimed "left = feminism" and that all feminists support it instead of just some.
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/20 01:43 PM
0

No, they dont. The best feminists, the ones actually interested in true equality, have a huge problem with islam. But most feminists arent like that. Most feminists dont actually care about equality, they just want privileges without responsibility. Many of them are also SJWs that see everything through the "privilege hierarchy" where white men are at the top and people like muslims are near the bottom. Because of this, they will constantly critiize white men (and their religion, christianiy) bu…
/r/AntiFeminists07/08/20 01:38 PM
4

In the matrix, the red pill means the world is must different than how most people see it. This is true in a lot of ways. Especially for things like female nature.
/r/MGTOW07/08/20 03:21 AM
1

Heres a tip I learned from spending lots of time on here - Most people wont read a long post unless theyre already interested in the conversation. Theyll see it and immediately start scrolling down because they dont want to bother. If you want to make a long post, start by making an intriguing comment that is short/medium in length. Then when people start responding, you can give the full explanation by responding to them. If you start off with an interesting comment thats short/medium in length…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/20 03:06 AM
1

Yes I understand that concern. But when youre worried about that, its better to come up with the best short summary you can. Instead of taking a paragraph or two talking about how its more nuanced, spend those 2 paragraphs giving the best summary you can explaining why its more nuanced.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/20 02:59 AM
7

Very likely. In our society its unacceptable for men to be ahead, but its encouraged for women to be ahead. Wherever women are behind, they will be lifted up. Wherever they are ahead, they will stay there. Women under 30 already out earn men under 30.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 02:57 AM
1

Yeah his post history is all twitch stuff. In a few years this guy will be donating half his paycheck to e-girls.
/r/MGTOW07/08/20 02:53 AM
2

OP conveniently ignored me but responded to plenty of other people who commented after me. Seems they aren't actually that interested in having their view changed. Like most CMV threads.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 02:46 AM
2

Maybe it is more nuanced and hes right. I just don't think its likely. I've had many debates with many people and I've noticed its common for people to say "its more nuanced than that" when they dont have a real answer. For example, lets say a feminist said something ridiculous. When people call her out on it, some SJWs will rush to defend her and give some baloney explanation about how "its more nuanced" because they don't want to admit that someone on "their side" is saying ridiculous things. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/20 02:43 AM
0

Nuance has become another SJW buzzword, just ignore him.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/20 02:28 AM
22

I think the "anti-MRA" people are so emotionally invested in their dogma that it would take a miracle to change them. No amount of facts or logic will persuade them. They have a strong emotional attachment to their ideology of "woman are oppressed, men are privileged." Any valid thing you say about men will go in 1 ear and out the other because of that attachment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/20 11:43 PM
3

Hopefully he finds one soon. His wifes boyfriend will kick his ass if he stops bringing home money for them.
/r/MGTOW05/08/20 11:29 PM
1

When theyre young, the resources dont mean much compared to things like looks and status. As they get older, their ability to "sleep up" decreases and their desire for resources increases. Thats when things like betabuxx start happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 09:58 PM
8

You are right that a common problem for nice guys is that they are too fat, shy, etc. However this doesn't mean that niceness has no effect on attraction. Women are attracted to status. They want men who are "better than them." Lets take two identical men. Everything about them is the same, except one is a janitor and one is a regional manager. To further illustrate my point of this hypothetical, we are going to say that these 2 men get paid the same. Women would be much more attracted to the re…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 07:57 PM
15

When they are assholes, its because they were assholes to another female. Like a mother doing something to her daughter, or a girl doing something to her sister. Its extremely rare for a woman to be called an asshole if her questionable behavior was towards a man.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/20 05:50 PM
1

For article 1 - it used "hypergamy" and "education" interchangeably, at least according to the abstract, so that doesnt contradict red pill theory. Maybe some dumb red pillers think women only date more educated men, but thats obviously not true. Hypergamy is very real in that women are attracted to males that are perceived to be at the top of the social hierarchy. In high school, its the jocks/bad boys. In college, its the frat boys/bad boys. In the workforce, its men in high positions. Of cour…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 05:47 PM
1

Did you honestly believe this before our discussion, or did you come up with it now? I dont think women are going to "smarten up and mutiny." They have two options - a committed relationships from men "on their level", or being able to "sleep up" but only casual sex. And theyre going to keep choosing to sleep up, until they get older and their ability to "sleep up" goes down and their desire for money goes up.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 05:36 PM
1

I am curious as to why you think its going to get better. So long as women can get men above them, thats what theyre going to do. Unless the top men decide they mostly wanna be monogamous, most women are going to keep "sleeping up" with them. So do you think the top men are going to stop sleeping around? Because otherwise, I dont see how this problem gets fixed.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 04:29 PM
37

Anyone with a functioning brain can see that AITA has a pro-female bias. But its always nice to have examples like this as further evidence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/20 03:55 PM
1

social status has no effect on womens attraction Said nobody, ever. Stopped reading there. Im not doing this back-and-forth where anti red pillers jump between "attraction is all about being nice, having common interests, being compatible, etc, it has nothing to do with social status" and "no of course social status has a significant impact, nobody said otherwise!"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 03:43 PM
4

Yes, the ones saying that "mens issues are feminist issues also" shouldnt be bitching when someone brings up MRA issues in a feminist sub. However not all of them see it that way, and its understandable why they wouldnt wanna talk about mens issues in a feminist space. Your last paragraph hit the nail on the head. Basically all feminists say that MRAs arent needed because feminism will solve all issues for everyone. Then they totally ignore mens issues, but still get mad when men bring it up, ev…
/r/MensRights05/08/20 03:24 PM
1

You are right that the red pill community is kinda split and diverse and there isnt one exact theory or set of theories that everyone believes. However that doesn't change the validity of my argument. "Anti-redpill" people are constantly calling the red pill "junk science" and bragging about how "pro science" they are themselves. Yet, I've never seen them post credible sources for their own beliefs. You want to argue that social status has no effect on womens attraction? Despite the fact that it…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 03:13 PM
11

Feminists don't care about men's rights. If they did, they wouldn't get angry, defensive, and antagonistic whenever a men's rights issue is brought up in a feminist space They dont only get angry when its brought up in a feminist space, they get angry when its brought up, period. I can understand why they'd get annoyed if you brought up a mens issue in a space that is specifically intended for feminist discussion. We shouldnt go into their "space" designed for womens issues and start talking abo…
/r/MensRights05/08/20 02:58 PM
2

This explanation is gonna be long, but its a reasonable argument that I am making in good faith because it seems like you do care about science and youre smart enough to understand it. If you are interested in this discussion, please read it all. Theres a miscommunication here, but thats my fault. You are taking the 80/20 thing way too literally/strictly because I didnt clarify it. I should have been much clearer about it. The 80/20 isnt some weird dichotomy where the bottom 80 get nothing and e…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 02:43 PM
2

I dont know the exact data for 2020 but it sure as shit is still lopsided. Average women can go on tinder and get tons of matches. Average men can get some, but way less. Really handsome men get an insane amount of matches. You seem like a reasonable person who likes science, so Ill let you do your own research. Use google voice (I think thats the program) to make 4 tinder profiles. Use a pretty attractive man and woman and average man and woman. Of course the bios should be identical and gender…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 12:25 PM
2

Which is fine, but it's just as bullshit as when someone else fills it in with different shit Its really not. Its not like Im taking wild, random guesses. Some theories are clearly far better than others Lets look at 2 theories Women swipe right way less because they can afford to be picky because our culture allows it. Between hookup culture, makeup, and the fact that many men are willing to "sleep down" (a 9/10 guy banging a 5/10 girl just because he wants to get laid), most women can sleep wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 03:20 AM
2

No where did I say pickiness, you keep going there, for reasons beyond m Because your theory requires it. Your theory should be "the reason women in online dating only swipe right 4% of the time, and rated 80% of men as below average, is because theres a sampling bias due to the fact that people who resort to online dating are unsuccessful." Theres no connection there otherwise. I made the connection for you by saying women are picky. I assumed thats what you meant because the connection isnt th…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 02:45 AM
2

Ive had plenty of success, asI stated multiple times. Everything I say that disagrees with your perconceived ideas is just going in one ear and out the other, so this conversation is over.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 02:35 AM
2

So treating women like queens is far more of a turn off than being an asshole? But TRP doesnt have truth to it? Okay
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 02:05 AM
2

No, I didn't say that at all, I said they're unsuccessful with the opposite sex. That theory is pretty rock solid. No, its not. I just explained why and youre literally ignoring the points I made and repeating yourself. You feel that such a study is unnecessary, cool, but don't pretend like you're on some sort of scientific high ground with your reasoning. This is a classic case of jumping to conclusions... You are proposing this 1 in a million theory that maybe "all the women on online dating a…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 02:03 AM
2

You keep baselessly repeating that when its clearly wrong. People change. If you do something mean, it doesnt mean you were never nice. Furthermore, youre ignoring my point about how I had success when I stopped being nice. Let me guess, i only attracted the "bad girls" when I stopped being nice?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 01:49 AM
2

Right off the bat, your theory is flawed. You are saying that people on online dating are way pickier (hence them resortimg to online dating). But, the right swipes were 4% for women but nearly 50% for me. This 4% vs 50% difference would mean that it only applies to women and not men. The reality is that most of the people on online dating arent these radically different weirdos whose preferences are extremely different from the norm. Most people on there are just regular people using it because…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 01:19 AM
2

What controls do you need for the raw data that says women swiped right 4% of the time and men swiped right 50% of the time? Realistically, none. Of course its possible that for some really strange reason, most of the men on online dating happen to be far worse looking than the average person. But is that likely? No. If you want to criticize this raw data, youre going to have to propose a decent theory about why the raw data is problematic, such as the fact that most men in online dating are ugl…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 12:54 AM
2

Yes, they can. A nice person can spend years as a nice person, only to realize that they get taken advantage of. Then they can decide that they dont want to be nice anymore. If someone does one bad thing, it doesnt immediately invalidate every nice thing that they ever did. You are saying "because you were a jerk to women at one point, it means you couldve never been genuinely nice to other women" which is just false.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 12:49 AM
3

No I didnt, that idea is just so burned into your head that youre assuming that. What I actually said was "I was nice for awhile and it was never successful, so I started acting like a jerk and I was successful." I wasnt talking about the same women. Its not like I was nice to 1 girl, and she didnt like me, so I started acting like a jerk. It was after years of being a genuinely nice guy to woman that I decided to switch it up and see what would happen. I started acting like a jerk and it worked…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 12:44 AM
3

it was clearly an act It wasnt an act, as Ive explained many times. See how no matter what I say, you cant get this idea out of your head? Wouldn't a nice guy be nice regardless of romantic interest Thats what I did. Idk why Im still replying, Ive already clarified this multiple times. Its like its going in 1 ear and out the other. Im going to stop replying now.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 12:41 AM
2

what makes you a nice guy if you stop being nice the moment your romantic love isn't reciprocated? I already specific that isnt what happened. But you are completely locked into this idea that "any guy who claims to be nice is actually just fake nice, who only did it because he expected sex, and he stopped being nice as soon as he didnt get it." You are going to keep believing that no matter what I say, so further conversation is pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 12:36 AM
1

It was raw data from online dating that showed women rated 80% of men as "below average" and only swiped right 4% of the time. Yeah, thats total shit science, man. but you can easily observe that a lot of average/ugly men have girlfriends/wives. You can easily observe that good looking, high status men are incredibly more successful with woman than other men, and that ugly/low status men are the least successful. The fact that a lot of ugly men finally find a girlfriend/wife at some point does n…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 12:33 AM
4

Im not going to reply if youre going to keep misrepresenting what I said and ignoring my main points. There reasons weren't reasonable. I was told "Im not ready for a relationship" by a girl who had a boyfriend a few weeks later. I was told "we want different things in life" when we hadn't even discussed the future, like college or anything. They were clearly excuses. And I didnt say that "women are assholes." I said theyre attracted to assholes.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 12:31 AM
10

I made a thread specifically asking for sources. Why are you here making all these comments but refusing to post even 1 source? "Im not doing it for you" is the lamest excuse in the book.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 12:28 AM
4

You are looking for anyway to discredit my personal experience. "Im not sure what your measurement of success is" and "you werent actually a nice guy and every woman used their psychic powers to realize this." Didnt you admit earlier that treating a woman like a goddess is a massive turnoff? So why are you doubting that now? You think I'm using a weird measurement of success to try and get you on a loophole? No. When I was nice, I was unsuccessful. When I was a jerk, I was successful. Do I reall…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 12:27 AM
9

Im seeing a lot of claims with 0 sources, the one thing I asked for. The one thing that you keep insisting you have, yet refuse to post.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 12:21 AM
1

Moving Goal Posts - creditability for studies depends on the narrative RP wants to portray. Both sides are guilty of this. Im not saying TRP is perfect, plenty of red pillers promote studies that they dont understand. But so does the blue pill. But the blue pillers are the only ones constantly claiming that theyre "pro science" and that the other side is "junk science." Im still waiting for you or anyone else to post a repeatable, peer reviewed study with a large sample size that clearly contrad…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/20 12:20 AM
6

You ignored my entire point about how I was unsuccessful with women when I was really nice to them, and then successful with women when I started acting like a jerk. Again, what exactly makes you a nice guy except for expecting sex when you treat women with the basic kindnesses you should be treating any stranger with? So the only reason that a guy would ever be nice to a woman is because he expects sex? There isnt such a thing as a genuinely nice guy who thinks women deserve to be treated well?…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 11:59 PM
1

I would need the scientific community to endorse it Its not going to for the same reason that it wont endorse the differences in crime rate and IQ among races. PC culture and cancel culture make it so that you can't endorse things like TRP whether or not theyre true. Instead of letting other people do your thinking for you, why dont you come to your own conclusions? Why do you think the online dating studies all showed that women rated 80% of men as "below average attractiveness"? Why did women …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 11:52 PM
1

Well, you asked for evidence that TRP endorses pseudoscience and resists falsification and I gave you a TRP endorsed contributor's post, the sub's 2nd-most-popular post of all time with over 4k upvotes, and the foundation of TRP's sidebar. I just explained why the post isnt pseduoscience. You just gonna ignore that? If that's not enough evidence for you, then it sounds like, ironically, your view that TRP doesn't promote pseudoscience is... unfalsifiable I can just as easily say that your anti-r…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 11:26 PM
8

I observed throughout high school and college that assholes were successful with women and polite men like nerds werent. I treated women like godesses and never got anywhere. So I switched it up and acted like a jerk and started having success.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 11:24 PM
8

A survey like that would be shit science. Most women can say they dont date assholes, but you can easily observe that women in general do date assholes. Theyre always complaining about boyfriends and FWBs who wont commit. On the contrary, its the blue pill that will deny TRP no matter what. The online dating studies show the 80/20 rule and blue pillers had ridiculpus answers like "women take better pictures."
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 11:19 PM
1

This sounds like a No True Scotsman fallacy to me. Alright, so Im just gonna go find the most ridiculous anti-redpill answer ever, say that anyone who disagrees with TRP is as delusional as that comment, and when you object ill just say "sounds like the no true scotsman fallacy." See how absurd that sounds? You dont get to cherrypick one person, say its representative of all TRP, and claim that anyone who disagrees is just falling for the "no true scotsman" fallacy. I'll give you the benefit of …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 11:13 PM
3

One person making an unfalsifiable claim doesnt mean all of TRP is that way. If credible studies were done that proved women arent attracted to status, confidence, etc then TRP would be falsified.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 10:48 PM
4

redpillers here make claims about women's ability to empathize (with men specifically but also as a general thing). they talk about female solipsism and the inability to appreciate other perspectives outside their own reality. that review is relevant to those claims This is a strawman. Redpillers say women dont have empathy for men specifically regarding things related to sex/relationships, like sexual success. Of course women have empathy for men with cancer and stuff like that. But if a woman …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 10:13 PM
0

Im moving the goalposts within my own OP? EVen though I never edited the post? Whatre you talking about? Or is "moving the goalpoat" some generic phrase you just toss around? here is no consistency on what makes a study reliable vs unreliable. Yes, there is. Whatre you talking about? One minute data collected by survey is acceptable/reliable, as long as they support the RP narrative, and if it doesn't, then it's deemed unacceptable/unreliable. Thats what the blue pill does. Theyre all about bein…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 10:03 PM
10

What does that study have to do with TRP? My original post specifically asked blue pillers for their science. Since blue pill means anti-redpill, this would mean any study that indicates TRP is wrong. This would mean any study that shows men of high status dont have more success with women than average men. Examples - Comparing high school jocks to other groups, like nerds, and finding no significant difference. Comparing men with "low status jobs" (janitors, cashiers, etc) and men with high sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 09:53 PM
6

I specifically asked for your "good science" studies. You just made a bunch of claims and posted 0 references. My entire point is that both sides makes claims without science to back it, but blue pillers consistently mention science as if its "on their side", despite them not having any.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 09:22 PM
16

Ive got science for days What am I supposed to post? Do you not see the problem here? If you are so certain that youve got "science for days" that indicates TRP is wrong, lets see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 09:18 PM
9

Pointing to the absence suffices. No, it doesnt. This isn't like someone saying "well, prove god doesnt exist!" God is unfalsifiable (at least for now) so yeah of course theres no way to prove he doesnt exist. TRP is not the same as that. Its a specific theory about observable human behavior. If its wrong, there should be studies that indicate that. If you dont have any studies supporting your claim, you dont get to discredit the other side by saying "you have no credible studies." You dont get …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 09:12 PM
10

So post it. Link me a few of your studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 09:01 PM
3

Hey, is that your mom again?
/r/MGTOW04/08/20 08:13 PM
25

I advised her to use tinder as a confidence boost Play stupid games, win stupid prizes
/r/MGTOW04/08/20 06:20 PM
6

I love how blue pillers are always criticising TRP on the basis of science, but they never have scientific sources themselves. Please link me any credible studies that support blue pill theory. Not some shitty salon article. Im talking about a well done, peer reviewed study with a large sample size. Show me any study like this that supports blue pill theory (women are attracted to niceness, arent attracted to status, etc). You want to talk about how scientific you are? Put your money where your …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/20 02:56 PM
10

Reddit is a liberal dump. Full of liberal women and cucks who believe in garbage ideas like "you cant be sexist against men", "america is extremely dangerous for people of color" etc. Dont bother with the popular subs. Its nothing but SJWs circlejerking in their delusional echo chambers.
/r/MGTOW04/08/20 02:08 PM
1

Dude, Im not trying to "turn and twist" anything. You said that "relationships arent the norm" and I said "no, they are the norm, but that doesnt mean you should try to have a relationship." Instead of saying "youre right, relationships are the norm but that doesnt mean theyre good" you wrote an unsuccessful essay about why we actually agree. Its ok to be wrong, man. Ive said plenty of false things throughout my reddit discussions. Everyone does.
/r/MGTOW03/08/20 03:10 AM
1

Why are you being so hostile? Normal means whats popular within a culture. Relationships are one of the most normal things there are. Yet some people are saying relationships arent normal, and that its just women and simps who convince us otherwise. I merely pointed out that relationships are indeed normal, despite the fact that they arent necessarily good. You keep insisting relationships arent normal (when they are) but now youre mad at me for arguing otherwise. If you want to make good argume…
/r/MGTOW03/08/20 01:13 AM
1

They did, actually. They were using "normal" to mean "right" instead of "popular". When they said "being in a relationship isnt normal", they clearly meant "right" instead of "popular".
/r/MGTOW02/08/20 09:13 PM
1

'Unconditional love' is an aspirational goal "I want to find someone with so many positive conditions that I'll love them unconditionally". The red pill may be a cult (according to your username) but at least its not braindead, unlike the blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/20 08:45 PM
1

Did you read the rest of my comment? I said in a parallel universe where women arent hypergamous and opportunistic.
/r/MGTOW02/08/20 08:09 PM
1

Women and blue/purple pilled men have convinced themselves that being in a relationship is the normal thing to do It is the normal thing to do. Normal =/= right. In nazi germany, it was normal to kill jews just for being jews. Being in relationships is normal, but that doesnt mean its the best choice to make.
/r/MGTOW02/08/20 07:59 PM
1

is desirable just as not having a poisonous toxin in our blood is Only after you understand the red pill, which I specified in one of my earlier comments
/r/MGTOW02/08/20 07:41 PM
1

The original commenter said that "being in relationships isnt the norm, because by default we arent in relationships, its just that simps and women have convinced us otherwise" I responded by pointing out the fact that plenty of things are "the norm" but arent default, like eating food or having shelter. You responded to this by saying "well, we arent in relationships by default" (which doesnt at all address my point about why thats irrelevant). Then you said maybe we are just arguing about sema…
/r/MGTOW02/08/20 07:30 PM
6

By default we dont have food. By default we dont live in houses. Does that mean neither of those are normal? By default, you are simply an organism. Everything else is related to your environment and behavior. Something isnt non-normal just because it isnt there by default.
/r/MGTOW02/08/20 07:14 PM
52

To be fair it is the opposite of the norm. By default, humans want to seek mates and most people spend their lives either in a relationship or chasing relationships. Only after men become redpilled are they no longer interested. Realistically, most of us here would love a relationship if relationships werent a shitshow. We are going our own way because we see how problematic relationships are in our society. In a parallel universe where women arent hypergamous, opportunistic, etc things would be…
/r/MGTOW02/08/20 06:27 PM
1

Ive read the about page, I thought you were linking something specific. I now understand that you want very specific content, rather than loosely related content. I was just giving my opinion that maybe the content could be a little less strict. If you disagree, thats fine, I was just saying thats my opinion. You know the sub better than me anyway so Im not saying I think you should change or anything, I was just giving some honest feedback.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/08/20 05:51 PM
1

The link didnt work. Maybe it doesnt fit here. I was just making the point that, in my opinion, I dont think we need every single post to be the cookie cutter tinder profile of a single mom looking for a "real man" to take care of her and her kids. If anything she seems like a WAATGM in the making. 10 years from now her tinder profile will be usual "single mom looking for a real man"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/08/20 05:34 PM
1

Does every single post have to be the same cookie cutter content? A single mom who slept around and is now looking for some guy to sweep her up? This woman wants a sugar daddy but says shes not a prostitute, so its possible shes looking for a beta. More likely that she actually is a prostitute, but its plausible that shes asking for a beta. Her cringey comments about how she doesnt want anyone to "waste her time" and "nothing in life is free" seems like she fits the profile of WAATGM closely eno…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/08/20 05:26 PM
6

Drunk bitches are GENIUS Yeah, comitting an easily traceable felony is so brilliant.
/r/PussyPass01/08/20 01:43 PM
1

Ah, now I see why you originally stopped responding. Youre out of rational arguments and are resorting to ad hominem and dishonest representations of whats going on. Science is corrupt and I am an outlier, if you want to think that, feel free to do so There are very few popular studies that ever show women in any negative way. There are plenty of studies that do show it, but they get buried by political bullshit. But theres plenty of popular studies talking about how awful men are, again because…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/20 08:34 AM
2

Honestly I think that is tinfoil hat. The world is full of shitty people. Plenty of men cheat. It really is "tinfoil hat" to assume all women are cheaters and all men are noble. Just based on these texts alone, it sounds like he definitely cheated on her. That doesnt mean she is "in the right" though, she sounds like a nightmare. "They dont know how to handle an independent women" basically proves that.
/r/MGTOW01/08/20 08:11 AM
20

Its also full of cucks who shit on men as a whole with the hopes that some lady will notice how great he is and sleep with him. Itll never happen, but they havent realized that.
/r/MGTOW01/08/20 08:09 AM
11

To be fair this sounds like a miscommunication. She said "he didnt know how to keep his dick in his pants so Im better off alone" It sounds like he cheated on her and thats why shes a single mom. However she still sounds dumb. Saying stuff like "they dont know how to handle an independent women" is cringe. But I think lots of people are misinterpreting her texts as "its his fault I got pregnant" when really shes saying "he cheated so Im single."
/r/MGTOW01/08/20 07:17 AM
1

if someone opens up in front of me and tells me what is on his mind and why he doesn't feel valued or seen, I think that is pretty strong! Maybe you personally do, but youre an outlier. Which is why I asked earlier and you said you didnt think you were an outlier. You are. Most women dont like it when men do things like talk about feeling not valued. being confident is attractive, being arrogant is simply not Arrogant men have women chasing them, men who are the opposite of arrogant almost never…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/20 07:04 AM
25

Its not even about being a virgin. They want the privileges of a traditional society without the responsibilities that come with it. That part about "fuckbois" was hilarious. Modern women in a nutshell - Despite the fact that many decent men want to date me, I only date loser bad boys who treat me like crap and then complain that all men suck
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/08/20 06:22 AM
32

A decent chunk of women think they can hit men with no retaliation. Maybe videos like this will knock some sense into them.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/08/20 06:09 AM
1

Im just answering your question man. You asked for my point, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/20 05:59 AM
1

No, I don't think I am an outlier. I trust other people to have the same understanding. They dont, women are disgusted by weakness. Again, you cannot use weakness and emotion interchangeably. Im not, im referring to emotions that indicate weakness. Of course women arent turned off by emotions like anger or arrogance. When you say thay most women do, how do you know that it is true? Evo psych plus a lot of personal experience to back it. Women are evolutionarily programmed to be attracted to the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/20 05:50 AM
1

My point is that looks effect men much more than woman. A 3/10 woman can put on some makeup, look like a 6/10, and hookup with some 8/10 guy. A 3/10 guy is basically doomed to inceldom unless he wants to betabuxx.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/20 05:48 AM
2

This is what Im talking about. The world is full of idiots and youre not gonna win this battle. Let them believe their stupid beliefs and do what you can with your own life to have the best life you can.
/r/MensRights01/08/20 05:47 AM
1

Lol this is the gendered version of "all lives matter"
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/20 06:09 PM
1

Do you think youre an outlier? Because it is 100% true that most women are turned off by male weakness/emotion
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/20 06:04 PM
3

No, this isnt a matter of "some women are shitty and treat men like crap when they open up", this is a matter of the fact that women, as a whole, are evolutionarily programmed to be disgusted by male weakness/emotion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/20 05:32 PM
26

This guy gets it
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/07/20 05:01 PM
1

Youve clearly never showed weakness to a girlfriend
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/20 04:19 PM
115

You didnt simply hit the nail on the head, you fucking impaled it with a sledgehammer.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/07/20 03:25 PM
20

Lol you guys ever see that meme where its a picture of a comet headed towards earth and the caption is "all life on earth to be extinct, women most affected"?
/r/MensRights31/07/20 02:27 PM
26

No theyre aware that both men and women need their partners permission. But like most issues, they only see it as a problem for women.
/r/MensRights31/07/20 02:26 PM
6

True, but it doesnt make it right. However theres a way bigger issue here. Even that women body shame each other, its nothing compared to the way men suffer from unrealistic body standards. A huge chunk of young men literally cant get sex because women are "sleeping up" and men are "sleeping down" A 2/10 woman can put on some makeup, look like a 5/10, and hookup with like a 7/10 because lots of men are willing to "sleep down" just because they wanna get laid. Its what happens in hookup culture. …
/r/MensRights31/07/20 02:22 PM
6

By that logic, most people are idiots then Yeah, my point is that our culture is irrational and if you care about it too much youll just constantly be disappointed. How can i not be disappointed if this the case? Im not sure. I think the first step would be coming to accept that society is flawed and that its ok. In the past, people used to think the earth is flat and they were hostile towards scientist who disagreed. Now, people think women are oppressed and are hostile towards those who disagr…
/r/MensRights31/07/20 02:12 PM
7

You have to find a way to not care too much about societys stupidity. You should care but not to the point where its taking a big toll on you. Humans are arrogant, irrational conformists. Most of human history is filled with cultures that had ridiculous beliefs. Our culture is no exception. One of our cultures ridiculous beliefs is the idea that women are oppressed, suffer from beauty standards, etc. If you care what idiots think, youll constantly be disappointed. Live the best life you can with…
/r/MensRights31/07/20 01:35 PM
28

Probably the same reason we see those ridiculous posts like "25% of homeless people are women." Most women and a decent chunk of men only care about womens issues. Women have such high standarda that 30% (and growing) of young men cant get sex? Oh well, youre not entitled to sex Obese woman cant get a date with a handsome guy? OUR SOCIETY IS SO SUPERFICIAL, END UNREALISTIC BEAUTY STANDARDS NOW It really is a clown world.
/r/MensRights31/07/20 01:20 PM
14

They dont need to. Simps and other women will support them no matter how misandric they are.
/r/MGTOW31/07/20 04:36 AM
6

oh her pool of simps dried up ? No, she was deeply in love with a Chad that used her as a sex buddy and dumped her. The post is complaining about getting too attached to someone and the disappointment that follows.
/r/MGTOW30/07/20 04:21 PM
54

True, but theres a bigger issue. A decent percent of men (like 10-20% or so) are lonely all the time, and that was before the pandemic. Lots of men have no support from people because people dont give a fuck about mens issues. Even the most lonely women get more attention/support than these 10-20% or so of "bottom" men. Loneliness/lack of support is a huge issue for men and its only getting worse. Its becoming a crisis. Yet nobody gives a fuck. But as soon as women are a little lonely, theres to…
/r/MGTOW29/07/20 01:20 PM
16

I dont think shes necessarily a stripper. It looks like a woman whose just DTF. I believe the reason its there is to show that mgtow can still get laid. Lots of mgtow men know TRP and have success with women, they just refuse to be in committed/long term relationships.
/r/MGTOW29/07/20 01:06 PM
7

Its both. But even gold diggers are so turned off by pussy worshipping men that white knights like him will never have a chance. Not unless he becomes a millionaire. Even still, he'd get "chore sex" once a month and she would sneak out once a week to bang Chad.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/20 12:50 PM
1

I reread your other comments and realized I originally misread one of your lines a few comments back and it threw off my interpretation of everything you were saying. I see your point now. Although its still true that many people use the term "friendzone" to basically mean "you have no chance", without really considering the friendship aspect of it. So I still think this is a silly semantics debate, rather than a genuine disagreement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/20 03:48 AM
4

Take a look in the mirror.
/r/MensRights29/07/20 03:42 AM
1

Youll need to find a way to condense your point into a few paragraphs if you wanna continue this conversation. I talk to a lot of people on here and dont have time to read doctorate dissertations.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/20 03:40 AM
9

This has nothing to do with the black pill. You are discretely trying to say "shut up incel." Nice try. the vast majority of women see female on male sexual assault as bad as male on female sexual assault Lmao, what planet are you on? Even if they see it as bad, they certainty dont think its as bad as male on female sexual assault.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 05:48 PM
-1

Its actually not. Its literally a slang term to mean exactly that. You want to take it to the dictionary? noun: friendzone - a situation in which a friendship exists between two people, one of whom has an unreciprocated romantic or sexual interest in the other. Its not dismissive of anything. Feminists just like twisting things to make it about how women are victims and men are bad. Just like youre doing now with your claim about "unequal power/interest dynamic."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/20 05:46 PM
6

I wonder how different the reactions would've been if she didn't write that arrogant part about "being offended that he didn't like it" and that stupid request for YTA verdicts to be PMs.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 05:43 PM
52

the men on my level don't seem interested or are hard to come across, what gives? Your level is 5/10 but you think its a 9/10
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/07/20 05:39 PM
4

Surprised he didnt get fired over this. If this happened 10 years in the future, he certainly would be.
/r/AntiFeminists28/07/20 05:37 PM
34

Betas dont pay half rent, they pay for everything. Shes not talking about a beta. She wants Chad to move in with her and split expenses. He wont, but she can dream.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/07/20 05:36 PM
20

Lol she threw a massive tantrum because her beta buxx didnt want to stick around while she slept with Chad. How dare this peasant think he is to good for me? Hes lucky that Im only fucking my ex and he should be grateful that Im giving him any sort of relationship Thats literally the thought process of the subconscious mind of women like her.
/r/MGTOW28/07/20 05:34 PM
62

As someone pointed out, it looks like a guy made the original post. Sounds like a white knight/simp whose trying to tell women that they should date him because hes a "real man" who would buy them more than water. Guys like that dont get dates though. Thats why theyre virtue signaling on social media, trying to get something. It never works, but they dont give up.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/20 05:30 PM
1

What are you talking about? The "friendzone" is just a slang term that means a woman has no sexual/romantic interest in you. It doesnt matter if the man tried manipulating her to get in her pants, or if he was a genuinely good guy who liked her a lot and hoped to get into a loving relationship. Both of those guys are "friendzoned". This debate about semantics is ridiculous.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/20 05:26 PM
14

I think its gotta be one or the other. You cant simultaneously know that society is misandric and take advantage of that by posting non-genuine content in an attempt to get support/popularity, while also being so misandrist yourself that you dont even realize youre twisting male issues into being female issues. In my first comment I intended to use that specific dichotomy, but there is a 3rd option. Someone could be misandrist while also acknowledging that society is misandric. Meaning they simp…
/r/AntiFeminists28/07/20 05:21 PM
34

"Dm me YTA comments" So the only comments are NTA? At least theyre not falling for it.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/20 05:17 PM
100

Do you guys think that the UN (and similar organizations/companies) are intentionally posting stuff like this, because they know society is gynocentric? As in, they know that tweets like this are ridiculous, but they post it anyway because they know it will get them support/popularity? Or are these people so misandric that they only care about womens issues? So much so that they twist male issues into female issues, maybe without even realizing it?
/r/AntiFeminists28/07/20 05:15 PM
56

Do people like this know that society is gynocentric and so they purposely post stuff like this because they know it will get a lot of popularity/support? Like the UN is intentionally saying stuff like this, despite knowing that its ridiculous, just so people support the UN? Or is it that people in the UN are just genuinely so misandric that they think its important to turn male issues into female ones?
/r/MensRights28/07/20 05:10 PM
5

Why are you so obsessed with the term "friendzone"? Its literally just a way of saying a woman has zero romantic/sexual interest in you. Its easier to just type out that one word than to say "she has zero sexual/romantic interest." We all know what it means. So apparently youre late 20s - early 30s average looking guy who shows weakness to women and youve already had tons of LTRs, dates, FWBs, etc? You said youve only had success with women for the past decade or so. So all of this success is cr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/20 04:56 PM
-1

How old are you?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/20 03:36 PM
3

And see, if you can show that you were forced to drive while drunk, you might escape convinction Inaccurate analogy. "Forcing you to drive drunk" would be analogous to forced sex. Drunk, consensual sex would be the equivalent of 2 drunk people willingly getting in a car and driving. Even if 1 isnt drunk, its still not his legal responsibility. It would be really shitty to let your friend drive drunk, but you wouldnt be the one legally responsible for it, it would still be the driver. If the drun…
/r/MensRights28/07/20 02:10 PM
14

Lol top comment on there says "women want men to show emotion." Coincidentally, they date/fuck men who dont show emotion and friendzone any men who show emotions or weakness. Total coincidence though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/20 01:55 PM
10

You could argue that people with shitty lives are more likely to commit crime, so the fact that men commit more crime is an indicator that most of the people with shitty lives are men. I dont necessarily agree with it, because i think men are innately more prone to things like violence, which in effect leads to more crime. You could also argue that men are expected to "man up" and do the "dirty work." Like if a poor family needs to shoplift, they would probably have their son do it instead of da…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/20 03:45 AM
9

How so? Shes obviously not sapiosexual. People usually say that to virtue signal or sound smart. But I dont see the connection to "im not racist, I have black friends." Whats the connection?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/07/20 04:27 PM
21

"Sapiosexual" but wants to hookup with a 6'6 personal trainer with a big dick. Its like words mean nothing anymore.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/07/20 04:24 PM
4

Thats not the point though. The point is that these articles are socially acceptable. What would happen if an article with the genders reversed was posted?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/20 04:07 AM
18

Menslib is a feminist sub first and a mens sub second. All mens issues must be discussed through the lens of feminist dogma and any opposing viewpoints will be banned. They claim that all mens issues are "toxic masculinity" and if you dare saying anything about women that isn't positive, you will be banned. For example, "many women see emotional men as weak." You are allowed to say that "men see emotional men as weak" but you cant say that women do the same. The sub is just so fake. They have a …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/20 01:53 PM
6

/FemaleDatingStrategy
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/07/20 10:17 PM
53

She'll use that to take Chad on a date. Women expect subservience (apologies, money, etc) from beta men. They expect dominance from Chads.
/r/MGTOW24/07/20 04:55 PM
78

Very few men are intimidated by confident women. Theyre turned off by arrogant, status obsessed harpies. But those women sugarcoat that as "men are intimidated by my confidence" rather than "men are turned off by my insufferable personality."
/r/MGTOW24/07/20 04:54 PM
20

Psychological projection is a defense mechanism in which the human ego defends itself against unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others. For example, a bully may project their own feelings of vulnerability onto the target. This article is a near perfect example of it.
/r/MGTOW24/07/20 04:50 PM
2

I very highly doubt that Elon would have offered that if he knew the situation. He's not offering it anymore, correct? Elon and Amber were hooking up at the time and Id assume she lied to him about Johnny being an abuser.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 04:48 PM
9

Even though most people wont say this, they definitely think it, at least on a subconscious level. They think its unacceptable for men to have any rights/privileges that women dont, but they do think its acceptable for women to have rights/privileges that men dont. So even if they dont blatantly state it, most people do think (either consciously or subconsciously) that women should have more rights/privileges.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 04:46 PM
49

At this point you have to be blind, deaf, and dumb to think that women are the disadvantaged ones. Making fun of men is not only acceptable, its often encouraged. Despite the fact that feminists say things like "men need to open up and we need to care about their emotions", they will laugh along with everyone else when men are shit on. But the second you say anything negative about any woman, all hell breaks loose. This is a perfect example. A girl posted an extremely embarrassing screenshot of …
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/20 04:43 PM
74

Who in their right mind would get into a relationship when theyre going to be far away from each other for most of the year? The blue pill is a hell of a drug.
/r/MGTOW24/07/20 04:38 PM
37

Lol the flair is "the audacity of scrotes" Like working is such an immoral, disgusting male behavior.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/07/20 04:37 PM
23

A couple of times per year for the husband, a couple of times per week for Chad.
/r/MGTOW24/07/20 04:29 PM
12

Insulting men is perfectly acceptable, and often encouraged. Insulting women is taboo, even if its in response to an anti-male insult. But yeah, women are oppressed.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/20 04:26 PM
6

I totally agree that the behavior wasnt appropriate at all and he should receive some backlash for it. I just hate how this is painted as a feminist issue. If AOC agreed with him, he wouldnt have said shit. If her policies were a little less extreme, I doubt he would have said anything. Still doesnt justify it, but this isnt merely a "man being sexist." I imagine he would have said something similar if AOC was a man. But when men insult each other like that, it doesnt make news headlines, becaus…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/20 03:04 PM
37

Mostly correct, but white knights dont believe that women only go for bad boys. Its red pilled men that know women love bad boys. White knights/simps think women like nice guys, hence their behavior.
/r/MGTOW24/07/20 02:36 PM
13

That doesn't mean that theres no difference. A woman calling a man a dick, losers, idiot, etc is just gonna get swept under the rug because nobody really cares. A man calling a woman a bitch is going to cause outrage because people have an innate desire to protect women, not men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/20 02:34 PM
21

You may loose parental rights the moment you are arrested So women can just falsely accuse their husbands of abuse to get full custody. Sounds fair. Harsher sentences when moral harassment drives the other to suicide This wont be enforced when its male suicide, even though most suicides are male. Health professionals may violate confidentiality against the victims will if they estimate she is "under the influence of the other" Victim = she. Women are victims, men are abusers. Using geo-localisat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/20 02:32 PM
15

Just like with humans
/r/MGTOW24/07/20 02:26 PM
5

How she hasn’t been fired yet is beyond me. Its surprising to you? Women can say whatever they want about men and its accepted. Even if its insane shit like male genocide, people defend it and say "shes just expressing frustration due to all the years of male oppression."
/r/PussyPass24/07/20 02:24 PM
57

It always happens. When that whole twitch scandal thing happened there was one guy who proved he was innocent. But lots of people still defended the accuser and said "I believe you". Our society is fucking disgusting.
/r/PussyPass24/07/20 02:21 PM
17

They will do literally anything to avoid admitting truths such as women are all chasing top men. The author said that the only reason that theres college hookup culture is because colleges have more women than men. Nothing to do with the fact that women are all chasing top men because makeup, online dating, and men being willing to sleeping down enables it. Blue pillers are funny.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/07/20 01:38 PM
1

If you thought we were done, why did you respond after I said it? Sounds like you have no good rebuttals, so now its time to pretend that you dont care.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 12:09 AM
1

I gave you sources from Wikipedia, sources from feminist writers and an analysis on why it makes sense. Your response is nah we don't like being mean to women? What more do you want? Your sources said nothing that we didnt already know. It wasnt even relevant to the specific points we are discussing. You dont get to just post irrelevant sources and claim victory. Your point of the patriarchy isn't the cause of all problems is valid, mostly because you're the only one that brought that up. You're…
/r/MensRights23/07/20 11:55 PM
1

I knew it was a mistake to respond when I saw your name. Oh well, lessons learned. We use the term because the analysis comes from male dominance. The terms don't make sense using them reversed. No, we use the term because its a way to identify that traditional male gender roles are toxic to men. We should also be using "toxic femininity" to refer to toxic female gender roles, but we dont. Not because "male power", but because society doesnt like to say mean things about women as a whole. You st…
/r/MensRights23/07/20 11:37 PM
1

Because men were the ones in power when these were made, we refer to it as the patriarchy and TM. If women were the ones that were culturally dominate and made these roles, it would would be called toxic femininity. Is this something you already believed? Or did you just make it up on spot, right now, because its necessary for your argument to be consistent? Im not seeing the connection. If women had power, I doubt that the term "toxic femininity" would be normal and "toxic masculinity" would be…
/r/MensRights23/07/20 11:15 PM
2

If a woman applied for a job in STEM and was rejected only due to the fact that she was a woman, would you call that toxic femininity? No? Exactly. If "toxic masculinity" means societies toxic ideas of male gender roles, "toxic femininity" is societies toxic idea of female gender roles. And therefore, a woman being rejected in STEM due to "math isnt for girls" would indeed be toxic femininity. But its not. Its "misogyny, patriarchy, oppression, male chauvanism" etc. See this linguistic slate of …
/r/MensRights23/07/20 10:44 PM
1

So youre just gonna ignore the first part of my post? It doesnt need to have a term. But if its going to have a term, it should be something less misleading and stupid. Im well aware of toxic masculinity is, and this isnt it. Toxic masculinity is male gender roles and behavior thats harmful, like a man bottling up his emotions because he wants to be a "tough guy." This situation isnt it. He sought help and got spit on. Thats not toxic masculinity, its the belief that that women need protection a…
/r/MensRights23/07/20 10:15 PM
27

Correct, even worse that its just a 13 year old boy
/r/MGTOW23/07/20 09:48 PM
1

Because humans are evolutionarily programmed to protect women. Men are the disposible ones. "Toxic masculinity" is a lazy, misleading label to this situation.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 09:46 PM
4

Isnt it funny how people who supposedly care so much about black people will happily silence a black person who disagrees with their political nonsense?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/20 03:52 PM
183

Notice how theyre all concerned with the woman being "slut shamed" but dont care about a 13 year old boy being extremely embarassed on social media? People think that a minor attack on a woman is worse than a huge attack on a man. Gynocentrism at its finest.
/r/MGTOW23/07/20 03:06 PM
8

Toxic masculinity would be him not seekig help. He sought help and got spit on. Not because of toxic masculinity, but because society doesnt care about male issues. Go back to /menslib or whatever dumb sub you came from where feminism and women are prioritized, and male issues are only discussed through the lens of feminism.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 02:53 PM
3

Do you ever get called uncle tom or anything like that? I imagine you would.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/20 12:52 PM
56

Nope, sexism against men doesnt exist. Honestly your incel-ish comment reeks of misogyny, bitterness, and hate. /s
/r/AntiFeminists23/07/20 05:10 AM
9

People more readily stereotype women as victims and men as perpetrators. As a result, harm to women evokes more concern than equivalent harm to men I think the cause is the fact that humans are evolutionarily programmed to protect women and to fight men This "instinct" is outdated because women dont need protecting and men arent committing crimes at way higher rates (despite what the media tells us), but its still a leftover trait. Kind of like how we enjoy sugary/salty/fatty foods even though t…
/r/MensRights23/07/20 04:52 AM
13

Women want to be with men who are "better than them." Not sure how much you guys know about the red pill. I think the sub has gone to shit, but the fundamentals of it have a lot of truth to them. Women are evolutionarily programmed to seek out the "highest status" male they can. When you worship a woman (constantly compliments, afraid to disagree, always text back immediately, etc) you are implying to her that shes above you, which in effect makes her think you are a loser and she will have zero…
/r/MensRights23/07/20 04:40 AM
1324

So many feminists/SJWs think they can just "win the argument" by calling the other person a woman hater/incel/misogynist. When the other person reveals that they are a woman, they have nothing to say. Which is because they had nothing to say in the first place, they were just hoping that their personal attacks would "win" the debate.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/20 04:31 AM
3

Teenagers as a whole are constantly shit on. I dont see this as a womans issue. In fact, when people think of a typical "dumb teenager" I imagine theyd be more likely to think of a boy than girl.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 04:16 AM
6

Actually mgtow is spreading like wildfire in some asian countries and the west isnt too far behind. It really depends on your definition of mgtow. If by mgtow you mean "man living alone in the woods" then of course it isnt going to be mainstream. But if mgtow means "any man who refuses to be in long term relationships" then yes mgtow will become mainstream. Hookup culture and online dating have destroyed the dating market. Women are all hooking up with the top men and those top men dont want to …
/r/MGTOW23/07/20 04:15 AM
0

Although I 100% see where you're coming from. You dont, actually. Toxic masculinity is "male gender roles and traditional behavior that harm men and women too." Thus, toxic femininity is "female gender roles and traditional behavior that harm women and men too." Using social manipulation as your tool is definitely a traditional female behavior. In the same way that "trying to be a tough guy" is toxic masculinity, gossip/rumors in order to gain power over someone is definitely toxic femininity. I…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/20 04:06 AM
9

Its just a theory of mine based on a lot of personal experience and reasoning (I think that women, for evolutionary reasons, are more "social" than men, and part of "social" is trends). Ive had social media for a long time and Ive witnessed countless trends. Women definitely posted more about trends, even accounting for the fact that women post more in general. You might be able to find some studies on it, but maybe not. A problem with looking for academic sources on something like this is acade…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/20 04:00 AM
4

Feminists operate on the idea "everything is sexist and intended to oppress women." Look at some of the comments there. He asked "is bro code sexist? Bro code means not sleeping with your friends ex, sister, mom, etc" and multiple people replied "sounds like you think those men own those women, so yeah its sexist." No, "bro code" is about not doing things that would harm your friendship. Dont fuck your friends ex, because that would hurt your friendship. Has nothing to do with your friend "ownin…
/r/MensRights23/07/20 03:54 AM
2

Its called a hyperbole. The media obviously isnt going to have headlines like that, but the media definitely misrepresents situations in order to stir up controversy. Thats what gets them views and money, so yeah theyll do it. For example, in this specific case, a lot of media sources will leave out the fact that the cops respectfully tried to work with her before she started shooting.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/20 03:41 AM
28

Nah when they say "jerk" they are usually referring to bad boys/chads that treated them like shit. They dont usually refer to previous beta boyfriends as jerks. "Loser", "ugly", "pussy" etc is how they describe betas.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/07/20 02:46 AM
6

I imagine the media will portray this as something like - Innocent woman, minding her own business, ambushed and shot by sexist cops because she declined to have sex with them The comments in the other sub are already talking about how the cops fucked this up.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/20 02:44 AM
16

99% chance hes a virgin
/r/MGTOW23/07/20 02:39 AM
7

It is socially acceptable to shit on men but social taboo to shit on women. But yeah, we live in an oppressive patriarchy where men are privileged and women are victims.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 02:36 AM
0

Wouldnt be surprised if the outcome was something like this - "These women didnt actually do it, they just allowed it, plus patriarchy bla bla bla misogyny bla bla bla male violence bla bla bla I sentence you to probation."
/r/MensRights23/07/20 12:55 AM
308

Here's the psychology behind it - Alpha/high status men aren't worried about other men taking their girl, for two reasons. They don't think it will happen They think "if it does happen, oh well, fuck her" If a janitor was hitting on a CEOs wife, the CEO probably wouldn't be worried. She very likely wouldn't fuck this janitor. But if she did, oh well, he can find a new girl. However, if a CEO was hitting on a janitors wife, he'd probably be panicking. They both have an idea of their own status an…
/r/TheRedPill23/07/20 12:42 AM
1

"Hey mom, I really dislike how you used to physically and verbally abuse dad, especially since you played the victim" "YOU HATE WOMEN!#$!$@" Truly surreal times we are living in. We are in for a hell of a future.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 12:06 AM
64

Isn't it funny how most people say "women want nice guys" but so many women have all these stories about awful men they dated in the past? Most woman have at least one story about an ex boyfriend who was a complete jerk, or cheated, or whatever. But women just want a nice guy? Blue pill cognitive dissonance is amazing.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/07/20 11:50 PM
19

Most people, both men and women, didnt care much about BLM (not enough to post about it, anyway) until this whole thing blew up. Now theres a giant social bandwagon for it. Its trendy. Women are more influenced by trends than men. Once BLM dies down on social media and something else trends, more women will post about that too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/20 11:44 PM
2

Dont forget your soylent on your way out the door
/r/MGTOW22/07/20 11:38 PM
28

People are becoming more skeptical of rape claims because of how loosely the word rape is being used. We had consensual sex after a few drinks? Actually you raped me, I couldnt consent I offered to fuck you in exchange for a promotion and you accepted? Actually no, you took advantage of my vulnerability and therefore it was rape Rape is a serious accusation. So yeah, if you wanna claim you were raped and get the guy throw in prison, its pretty important to first establish whether it was forced p…
/r/MGTOW22/07/20 11:36 PM
30

Yikes, major YTA. Listen, buddy. You dont own your wife. This isnt the 1800s anymore. Its her body, her choice. She even tried to include you and you refused, like an insecure crybaby. If this is how you act I can see why she wants to be intimate with other guys. Go get the therapy you need.
/r/MGTOW22/07/20 11:31 PM
18

I'd say the posts go something more like this - My wife disappears all weekend without calling or texting. This has been happening for months so Im starting to get worried. I know shes not having sex with anyone because she told me shes "just not a sexual person" and I know its true because we haven't had sex in years. But Im kinda nervous that maybe she has a gambling addiction because our bank accounts are constantly getting drained. How do I approach this?
/r/MGTOW22/07/20 11:28 PM
8

Thats the hilarious part. TRP is dating advice for men and FDS is dating advice for women yet they are radically different. TRP advocates for relentless self improvement. It tells you how you can drastically change to be successful. FDS just complains about how terrible men are and tells all women that they deserve nothing less than a tall, handsome, wealthy man who treats them like a queen. There is literally zero advocating for self improvement.
/r/MGTOW22/07/20 11:22 PM
2

You could learn red pill/PUA stuff and basically have FWB/hookups without having a relationship. Youd just have to be careful with that also. You could also try monk mode which is hard at first but gets easier. Although Ive heard that going a long time without ejaculating can heavily increase your chance of prostate cancer, but Im not sure if its true.
/r/MGTOW22/07/20 11:10 PM
3

Yeah but I dont see how that contradicts what I said. They think of top men as great and all other men as losers. And if a top man commits to them and treats them well, they will see him as a loser too, but still see the other top men as great.
/r/MGTOW22/07/20 02:33 PM
6

Women want sex, just not with beta losers like this guy. Shes getting sex, just not with this clown.
/r/MGTOW22/07/20 02:28 PM
3

This guys post is hitting levels of cope that shouldnt even be possible. Sex is only for reproduction, Im fine with never having sex after I have kids His wife probably told him that and he believed it. Then she went and fucked some guy while he worked overtime to buy her overpriced nonsense.
/r/MGTOW22/07/20 02:23 PM
16

Exactly. Hes a total beta doormat who worships her and makes excuses. Women are sexually repulsed by these men. The baby probably wasnt his. I think she slipped up by saying "youre making this about you." That statement doesnt make sense if the kid is his, because he lost his kid so of course hes upset. But if the kid isnt his? It makes perfect sense. In her subconscious mind shes thinking this is my baby, not yours, why are you so upset about it? That made her mad, so she slipped up and said "w…
/r/MGTOW22/07/20 02:14 PM
8

No bottom 80 as resources. The top 20 as cool, amazing guys they respect. Its growing too, becoming more like 90/10.
/r/MGTOW22/07/20 02:03 PM
8

It might not even be his kid. Based on his post (the way he worships her, makes excuses for her) he sounds like a total beta. Lots of women will get pregnant from a Chad and let the beta husband think its his. Her saying "youre making this about you" kind of sounds like a slip of the tongue, admitting the kid isnt his. Its my baby and youre making it about you.
/r/MGTOW22/07/20 02:01 PM
11

So apparently - The way things work, engineering, vehicles = dumb shit to think about.. Celebrity gossip, boyfriend gossip, dumb tv shows, etc = smart things to think about. Alright, einstein
/r/MGTOW21/07/20 10:30 PM
1

If a man ripped open a woman’s shirt to expose her, it would still be sexual assault Not all sexual assault is violence. Throwing someone to the ground and trying to rape them is definitely violent. A drunk idiot ripping someones shirt because they think the person is hot isnt violence, even if it is sexual assault.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 07:29 PM
1

Based on your response it sounds like you javd been a victim of it, and Im sorry to hear that. I hope it doesnt take too much of a toll on you. But its not about a lack of empathy from me. Its about linguistics and misleading language. Violence is a serious accusation. Violence is physically attacking someone or making serious, legitimate threats to them. A drunk idiot ripping someones shirt because they think someone is hot is not violence, its an obnoxious drunk person being trashy.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 07:24 PM
1

a comparable amount of 'violent assault' from a woman to man would be like a man violently and forcefully tearing and removing a woman's shirt, roughly groping while loudly and drunkenly saying 'come on baby', and undoubtedly if in private would lead to rape. So, I guess I kinda get it now. When I think about it that way, it is definitely violent. Huh. And I would say the same thing if it was a woman. If a woman was violent groping a man, saying "oh come on", forcing him to the ground, etc I wou…
/r/MensRights21/07/20 07:22 PM
0

I disagree, I think a man ripping a womans shirt would be obnoxious and a destruction of property, but not violent.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 07:14 PM
1

Im not throwing them under the bus. Im pointing out that feminists are the ones who would classify this as violent rather than obnoxious. Its not like the girls hit him, forced him down, took his dick out or anything. They just ripped his shirt. Which is obnoxious and a destruction of property, but not violent.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 07:13 PM
10

I wouldnt be surprised if he worked a bunch of overtime to be able to afford donations to egirls.
/r/MGTOW21/07/20 04:58 PM
43

Its because women believe they are supposed to be the sexual selectors. Online dating and makeup has only heavily inflated that. Even fat and ugly women can put on some makeup and hook up with decent looking dudes. Meanwhile more and more men are struggling. Average looking men cant get average looking women because average women are all chasing top men. Hence why they have to sleep down and fuck fat/ugly girls. Yet, even with this imbalance that massively favors women, we have women advocating …
/r/MGTOW21/07/20 04:57 PM
2

huge difference between tapping someone for their attention and fucking ripping up someone's shirt Of course theres a huge difference. You were the one that put them in the same category by saying "all unwanted touching is violence", which is basically what feminists say.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 04:40 PM
3

it'd kind of be pointless to ask for consent when tapping someone's shoulder Doesnt matter. You said (and feminists say) that touching without consent is violence/sexual assault. See how crazy it is? hugging without consent could be sexual assault And you dont think thats ridiculous? Thats the kind of radical policies that feminists want. We shouldnt want it. Its neurotic.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 04:30 PM
3

No, it doesnt. If you tap someone on the shoulder without their consent, its not violent. If you hug someone when they ask you not to, its not violent. Its obnoxious, not violent. Ripping someones shirt is trashy and obnoxious but its not violent. Its quite an exaggeration to put it in the same category as something like punching someone. I cant believe how many of you are falling for this. The mods removed it because it shows women committing sexual harassment. Nothing to do with violent crime.…
/r/MensRights21/07/20 04:18 PM
4

Getting touched isnt violent. Having your shirt ripped by (probably drunk) women who think youre hot isnt violent, its obnoxious and trashy. We arent doing ourselves any favors by exaggerating like feminists do.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 04:11 PM
1

You said you've never modded and don't spend much time in women streamer's chats. You have no practical experience with these "mods" you're complaining about besides reading what other people have written. You clearly dont know much about twitch chat. I dont need to be a mod to know that its tedious and required vigilance. Theres no report option in twitch chat and the live feed moves pretty fast. That means for people to remove bad comments, they need to be basically staring at chat just waitin…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/20 03:50 PM
-4

Lets not be like feminists here. Feminists love to wildly exaggerate and use misleading language. This isnt a violent crime. Its obnoxious women, probably drunk, tearing a guys shirt. Is it ok? Absolutely not. It shouldnt be tolerated at all. But is it really a violent crime? No. Labeling this as a violent crime is putting it in the same category as things like assault and battery, armed robbery, etc which is really misleading. Its crazy how you guys are falling for this. The mods removed it bec…
/r/MensRights21/07/20 03:40 PM
0

Well, given how broad that definition has become, yes there are times where something is technically sexual harassment but isnt a violent crime. Forcible rape, violent sexual harassment, etc are violent crimes. Ripping a guys shirt off isnt a violent crime, its just an obnoxious one.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 03:35 PM
-17

That wasnt a violent crime, it was an obnoxious one. Again, theyre looking for excuses. Do you think they wouldve removed it if it was a guy at a party ripping a womans shirt? No, and it would have 100k upvotes. Edit: I think this is a misunderstanding. I wasnt saying that this is acceptable or anything like that. I was saying I dont think this is a violent crime. Its women, probably drunk, tearing a guys shirt off. Its obnoxious, its destruction of property, it is indeed a crime, but a violent …
/r/MensRights21/07/20 01:59 PM
83

That just sounds like an excuse. I cant imagine that all illegal posts are removed from /trashy. Mods, both male and female, love removing posts that show women doing something wrong.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 01:36 PM
1

So to sum up your position, you've made a ton of assumptions with little actual experience yourself and you only want to bitch and whine about it. No, thats clearly not whats going on. Anyone reading this conversation can see that. At this point youre blatantly lying because its the only way you can keep defending your original position, so this conversations over.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/20 04:19 AM
1

You've clearly spent a lot of time modding channels as well. I have spend literally 0 time modding channels. I know how twitch chat works so I know how vigilant/tedious it is to be a mod. You've spent time viewing women streamers and harassing them in chat. Not really. A bit of trolling but nothing harmful. Simps will remove your comments even if you give constructive criticism in a respectful way. Believe it or not but I find that you're "pathetic and need help" Good for you, I dont care what y…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/20 03:58 AM
0

The main point of all of this is your need to enjoy making fun of people who don't align with your values or beliefs is truly pathetic Its not a "need." Im on an internet forum talking with people. Sometimes we talk about pathetic people, and sometimes it leads to funny conversations. You find sumps unbearable and a joke because... Your values don't align lol. You keep misrepresenting this situation in really weird ways to try and make your argument sound better. Its not like Im making fun of so…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/20 03:45 AM
3

Ok, and did you mod because he was a friend of yours? Or did you mod because you are a lonely man who is so desperate for attention from a woman that you'd spend hours a day, everyday, modding her chat? And you even said that it wasnt a lot of time/effort from you. You turned it down when he wanted you to mod more. If you thought I was calling you pathetic for modding, I wasnt. I was making a specific point about desperate men who put women on a pedestal and do lots of free work for them. I dont…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/20 03:29 AM
2

Spent a lot of time on what? It doesnt take a lot of time to realize or explain why twitch simps are pathetic. I dont see whats unhealthy about having discussions on reddit and hearing different opinions.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/20 03:25 AM
2

You're making a lot of assumptions. If you want to refer to common sense as "assumptions", then sure. Its obvious that no normal healthy person would want to spend hours a day, everyday, doing unpaid labor for an internet stranger. Its not easy labor, either. Its time consuming, tedious labor. You stare at a live chatroom and immediately remove any mean comments. Its not like reddit wheres theres modmail/notifications and you can just get to it whenever. In twitch chats the mods are just staring…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/20 03:04 AM
2

but if it makes them happy more power to them Not really. Their own mental problems (like severe loneliness) are the only reason that they want to do these things in the first place. By "indulging" in these behaviors, they are only making their mental problems worse. They spend hours a day modding a strangers live chats because theyre lonely, but that behavior is just making them even more lonely. You dont fix yourself by behaving in self destructive ways. It doesn't effect you in any way yet it…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/20 02:49 AM
0

It's always baffled me when a person resort's to using their opposing viewpoints tactic... Its literally you giving up your position to agree with me. No, its not. Because I dont think you are wrong for stating your opinion and criticizing me. I think youre wrong because what youre saying itself is wrong. I dont oppose to you stating your opinion and us having a discussion, even though I think the opinion itself is wrong. You are the one trying to be an internet cop, who thinks that people shoul…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/20 02:43 AM
4

Reddit jannies are alright. If theres a community that someone enjoys a lot and they spend a lot of time in it, I dont see a problem with being a mod. Specifically because theres modmail on reddit. You get notifications for reports, so you dont have to stare at your screen waiting for something. But with twitch, you literally have sit there watching the live chat and immediately removing any "bad comments." Thats why twitch mods are so pathetic.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/20 02:30 AM
7

I dont believe it. But a lot of these simps do. They secretly hope that theyll one day have a chance with her. Do you seriously think its not pathetic that these people do unpaid labor for hours everyday for some internet stranger? Like if a husband/boyfriend moderated his wifes/girlfriends chat it would at least make sense since theyre in a relationship. But its completely pathetic to spend hours everyday staring at the chatroom of an internet stranger so you can immediately remove any comments…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/20 02:26 AM
-1

What a person does with their own time that doesn't involve abuse against anyone is fine by me Well, "fine by you" doesnt determine whats pathetic or not. There are plenty of pathetic things that don't hurt others, and theyre still pathetic regardless of your strange idea of what qualifies as pathetic. Also, do you not see the irony in this? You are doing the very same thing you are criticizing me of doing. I criticized simps for being pathetic. You said that I shouldnt judge them and that Im pa…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/20 02:22 AM
2

We are on a discussion forum where we talk about these things. Its not like I have a burning passion for it, but yeah I think its pretty stupid that some guys are actually so pathetic that they do unpaid work for like 20+ hours a week for an internet "friend" who probably thinks theyre a loser. And why do you care? Youre criticizing me for caring, while you yourself are here caring what we all think.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/20 02:04 AM
3

Actually no, dedicating a large chunk of your week, every week, to staring at a chatroom and removing "mean comments" for an egirl who think youre a loser is much more pathetic than my comments in this sub. Why are you so mad about it? Are you one of the simps who dedicates hours of free labor each day to random girls who secretly think youre a total loser?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/20 01:51 AM
13

No thats the funny thing. They do it free.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/07/20 12:28 AM
5

It depends on the dedication level. If you are a more passive mod that doesnt actively look for things to remove, youre not necessarily a simp. If you enjoy the content (not because shes a girl either) and you passively mod (just remove anything obnoxious you happen to see in chat, but dont go out of your way to look for it) then yeah that wouldnt make you a simp. But if you go out of your way to watch the stream and/or chat, ready to remove comments and ban people, then yeah youre a simp. Espec…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/20 10:59 PM
474

Im not sure but I know tons of simps will mod the chats of twitch girls for free for long periods of time. Theyll literally spend 20+ hours a week (however long she streams) just staring at chat and removing any comments they think are inappropriate. How fucking pathetic is that?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/20 10:14 PM
1200

Amount of hours this guy has spent working for alinity (for free): 1000+ Amount of hours alinity has ever had any romantic/sexual feelings for him: 0
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/20 09:39 PM
0

Women sometimes date down but they rarely perceive it as dating down (with the exception of betabuxx). A guy can be objectively "below" a woman. Less money, worse job, less friends, etc whatever you'd use to measure status. But he could have a personality attractive enough to make her think that hes the better person. This doesn't mean blue pill nonsense like "similar hobbies" or anything like that, it means his behavior. If he acts like hes better than her, she will believe it on a subconscious…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 08:58 PM
1

Being promiscuous isnt red pill, its a common behavior of red pillers. The red pill is the knowledge. And religion is very red pilled. Religion knows that for everyone to be somewhat sexually and romantically satisfied, men need to be masculine and we need socially enforced monogamy. Because otherwise all the top men get all the girls and the bottom men are sexless and society goes to shit. I don’t see how promiscuity and polygamy are possibly blue pill You are looking at it in a very narrow way…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 08:51 PM
1

Religion at its core is very red pilled. It has specific gender roles and rules (like men being very masculine, lifelong monogamy being the norm, etc) because the people who wrote it saw what happened in a sexually liberated society without gender roles. Religion tells men to be masculine and dominant because its attractive. It tells people to be monogamous because sexual liberation leads to disaster. Todays religious people are pretty blue pilled though.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/20 07:55 PM
1

Yeah arguing with you wasn't enriching, it was pallid and a chore Funny way of saying "I lost the debate, so now its time to pretend that the debate didnt matter anyway, it was just pillad and a chore" I found someone else in the thread posting academic sources. My attention is going there. You posted zero sources yourself. But thats alright, because we were having a debate where sources weren't relevant. So why are you now mentioning sources out of nowhere? Seems like nothing more than a desper…
/r/MensRights11/07/20 10:41 PM
1

Hahaha, thats your response? What i find so funny about debating SJWs is theyll never admit they might have been wrong. When its obvious theyre wrong and have no further rebuttals, theyll just toss out insults like "wow youre so angry" or "youre alt right so your opinion is irrelevant" even when the person clearly isnt alt right. We are done here.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 09:38 PM
1

Why do you keep talking as if you witnessed the conversation? You didnt. I wasnt being hostile. Youre using circular reasoning. Youre starting with the premise "well if he was banned he obviously must have done something wrong" instead of being open to the idea that maybe that sub unjustly bans people. Heres what happened. A girl on menslib was trashing men. Way over the top. Saying men treat women awfully, men are predatory and immoral (true to a degree, but so are women), men need to heavily i…
/r/MensRights11/07/20 09:20 PM
1

So there was a thread of people trashing men over in menslib (the usual) and one girl was going over the top. Saying men are trash, immoral, predators, and need to start treating women a lot better. Some guy says "thanks for the harsh truth, how can I do better?" and it was obvious he was being sincere. She completely flips her shit. "YOURE NOT ENTITLED TO MY EMOTIONAL LABOR", "go get a therapist, Im not your yoda" etc. Just completely obnoxious nonsense. So I (respectfully) said "if your argume…
/r/MensRights11/07/20 08:59 PM
1

It got removed by the mods and i was banned so i dont have a way to dig it up. I can tell you about it though if youd like.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 08:43 PM
1

Just so you know, hes lying. I wasnt hostile towards the woman. He didnt see the conversation that he is referring to, but he keeps making these baseless claims. Such as "you were rude to her so youre not entitled to an argument" which isnt true at all. I wasnt rude. He wasnt there, hes literally making it up. Ignore the troll.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 08:38 PM
3

The argument is that you aren't owed a debate or response, yet keep demanding one How many times are you going to repeat this ridiculous, dishonest nonsense? If you make an argument on discussion forums, and someone argues back, you dont magically invalidate their argument by saying "youre not entitled to an argument." She initiated the argument by making the claim that men are trash. I argued that she was wrong, in a respectful way, and I still got banned for it. Clearly they are in the wrong a…
/r/MensRights11/07/20 07:49 AM
3

Yes im banned from mens lib because its a misandrist shithole full of self loathing men and hateful, radical feminists who shit on men. That was my entire point. A radical feminist was shitting on men, but clearly couldnt back up her claims. I pointed that out and got banned. Clearly, that sub is trash. The fact that your response is "youre not entitled to a debate" shows how wrong you are. I cant think of a more ridiculous way to respond to someone you disagree with. Its so obviously a cop-out.…
/r/MensRights11/07/20 07:25 AM
5

Not everything is an argument and people don't owe you an argument. Except, in that case, she specifically made an argument and I simply argued back. That was the whole point. And generally the entire point of reddit debate forums is to do things like give arguments. And political subs like mens lib fall under the category of debate forums. You havent given a single logical/factual rebuttal to my argument. You just childishly claimed it was rude and therefore banworthy, without backing up that c…
/r/MensRights11/07/20 07:10 AM
3

How exactly did I act like an "entitled dingdong"? All I did was point out the massive flaw in her argument. If you are going to insist that men are massively flawed and need major change, but youre unable to offer any solution to those supposed flaws, then yeah your theory is probably wrong.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 06:24 AM
2

Why?
/r/MensRights11/07/20 06:15 AM
7

Exactly. I browsed that sub for a bit and found a comment calling men trash. It was a woman claiming that men are immoral predators, and it was highly upvoted. A guy responsed "thanks for the harsh truth, what can I do to better myself?" and she freaked out. Saying stuff like "Im not your therapist" "youre not entitled to my emotional labor" etc. I responded by saying "the fact that you cant give advice on how "men can improve" indicates that your theory is wrong. If you were correct that "men s…
/r/MensRights11/07/20 03:22 AM
1

No problem man. Ill definitely check out your channel and participate, like commenting and whatnot. However i still think you should rebrand. You are early enough to do it. Come up with a clever name, even if it takes you all day. A good and consistent name is going to make such a huge difference as your channel grows. A thesaurus is your best friend when brainstorming names. Come up with a good alternative to "mens rights news."
/r/MGTOW09/07/20 04:41 PM
19

Books, online research, and stock simulators. Stock simulators are great because its practice. You have pretend money and you trade in the stock market with it. The app has the real prices of stocks, so its exactly like the real stock market, except you dont actually have real money in it. The apps will give you fake money to play with, so you can see how you wouldve done if it were real. Itll give you a sense of patterns, how much is overcommitment, etc. Best of luck man.
/r/MGTOW06/07/20 12:45 AM
19

In response to what the other guy said - if you learn investing, its not just "gambling." If someone tries to trade stocks when they know nothing then yeah its gambling. But if you learn the market, patterns, why stuff goes up and down, etc you can invest with success. You cant completely guarantee anything, but with the right methods and kniwledge, you can get pretty damn close to a guarantee of huge gains.
/r/MGTOW06/07/20 12:36 AM
2

Hey man Ive done lots of research on stuff like this (making my own website) and I really think you should rebrand. Your youtube channel and URL should be the same. Some people will click your links and go to your site, but other people will type it manually and go to the wrong site. Plus, it juat looks unprofessional to have Zs. Thinking of a good name takes time but its well worth it. Come up with something more unique and buy the domain for that and replace it. A thesaurus and rhyming diction…
/r/MGTOW06/07/20 12:19 AM
72

Learn investing and youll be set for life in 10 years. Best of luck to you. Great story btw.
/r/MGTOW06/07/20 12:04 AM
2

From what Ive heard, india is extremely gynocentric. Cops take things like domestic abuse seriously (when the victim is female). If that is true, this "justice group" is nothing more than virtue signaling witch hunt. We have those too in America, except instead of beating men with brooms, they try to get them fired, locked up, etc over mere accusations or politically incorrect statements. Since you claim its so nuanced and theres a good reason for it, why dont you elaborate on that nuance? Or, d…
/r/MensRights04/07/20 08:15 PM
0

If Im missing some important detail, please enlighten me. Id like to know how you think its a good thing that they have mob justice. You are sadly mistaken if you think they have some foolproof system to only attack guilty men.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 03:52 AM
1

They wouldnt. Dont expect people on those subs to have any sort of self awareness.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 10:07 PM
9

Important point, its not just "feminazi scum" that thought men couldnt be sexually abused, its a good chuck of society. Lots of people, just regular men and women, think that men cant be victims (unless the abuser is also male).
/r/MensRights02/07/20 06:27 PM
2

Its so hilarios. On subs like AITA theres a massive bias in favor of women, but youll constantly see comments like "reddit hates women" with tons of upvotes
/r/MensRights02/07/20 02:40 PM
1

I said it wasnt the norm. Wasnt that obvious based on the rest of my comment? About how a mom and daughter would be glad if they were both banging the same celebrity, but would fight if they were both banging an average guy.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/20 07:20 AM
21

They would also prefer to have no man than a "bad" (beta) one. They would also prefer to have an abusive alpha than a spineless beta. The underlying principle here is that they strongly desire alpha males and sexually despise beta males.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/20 01:21 AM
4

We are mere animals. Animals that have high levels of consciousness, self awareness, and other great things like civilizations, but still just animals. As a species, we evolved so that men are disposable. Subconsciously, women treat men like tools, without even realizing it. Similarly, meny men treat women like sex objects, without realizing it, Its evolution.
/r/MGTOW02/07/20 12:59 AM
25

Theres a reason that most past societies and most major religions has very similar and specific gender roles. When the man is masculine, it is possible for couples to be happy (happy enough) long term and stay married until death. Abandonment of masculinity, hookup culture and self esteem issues have pretty much destroyed that. Men in general are less attractive to women due to them being less masculine. But hookup culture is also giving women unrealistic standards. And womens low self esteem pr…
/r/MGTOW02/07/20 12:57 AM
8

Lots of older women can cook well. Its mostly younger women (and men too) that don't cook because theyre so used to ordering food or cooking easy stuff, like frozen meals.
/r/MGTOW02/07/20 12:53 AM
149

I think your field report isn't representative of the norm, but theres definitely a useful piece of info from it - Women will break many rules if the man is high value enough. A typical mother and daughter aren't going to share a typical FWB guy. But if they both see the guy as very high status (alpha to an extreme, kind of like a celebrity) they are willing to break rules like that. Most mothers/daughters would be thrilled if they were both sleeping with Chris Hemsworth. Where as if they were s…
/r/TheRedPill02/07/20 12:51 AM
5

Youre not wrong because youre loud & obnoxious, youre wrong and loud & obnoxious.
/r/AntiFeminists02/07/20 12:46 AM
44

Its so funny how women are always complaining about "fuck boys" when they sexually incentivize men to be "fuck boys" by sleeping with those kinds of men. Only sleeps with men who act like jerks Gets treated poorly by the men she sleeps with Surprised pikachu face
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/07/20 12:45 AM
19

The greatest man who went his own way in all of history. As far as we know anyway.
/r/MGTOW02/07/20 12:42 AM
69

A "guilty until proven innocent" mob justice system that attacks men (some of which are guilty, some of which are innocent) has 4k upvotes in two hours. Reddit has such a justice boner for protecting women and trashing men.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 12:41 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter