TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ProgmusicHans Archive

View 0 posts and 230 comments by ProgmusicHans on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This doesn't compute. Being a high value woman is constituted by being able to hold down a high value man long-term. A woman isn't good at dating and thereby not being able to get with one, maybe even not being able to get with an above average dude long-term? She simply can not be a high value woman.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/21 05:30 AM
1

Why do men have to commit to a woman but a woman doesn’t have to commit to a man? Why do you assume that the woman isn’t also willing to commit? You don't even know the topic at hand. We were talking a scenario in which the woman has feelings for the guy and wants a relationship at best, thus feeling used when she doesn't get the hoped for outcome after trying to use sex as leverage, actively dismissing sex vs sex as an equal exchange that does NOT entitle her to more. SHE wants to commit AND wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/21 11:53 AM
2

He lies to her because he wants sex then leaves. Happens all the time. ​ Ah, the typical boogeyman. Nope, it is NOT happening all the time. People have sex all the time and after the fact some woman feeling entitled to more, cause they indeed see sex as a tool to receive committment. Men do NOT say "Ok, I am willing to committ to you after sex. Pinky promise" and you know that. At most a man is saying, that he is interested in having a relationship in general and should the woman do not provide …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 11:07 PM
7

What dishonest nonsense are you trying to pull? You can't say this I wasn't talking about this. This falls under relationships. when I was saying this Person A wanted person B to like him/her after you were saying this You would know that, if you really really really wanted someone to like you "Wanting someone to like you" was a talking point started by you, not me. Don't tell me "I wasn't talking about this" when I can quote you on YOU not only saying it, but starting with it. Wanting someone t…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 07:23 PM
5

Thanks for proving my point. I am talking about giving away sex to receive sex. It's an equal exchange, NOT based on expected outcome, but based on input. One person does NOT get what he or she wanted out of the equal exchange? That does NOT constitute being used for sex, it just means the person didn't receive out of it what the person hoped for. Doesn't make it NOT an equal exchange. But let's go down the rabbit hole: Person A wanted person B to like him/her. Person B wants to be gone after th…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 05:05 PM
4

Being used for sex is a negative, not a positive. Sex vs sex is an equal exchange. You would know that, if you really really really wanted someone to like you, had sex with that person and then they're gone. Once again TRP has been proven right. You can call an equal exchange of sex vs sex "being used", just because she doesn't get a relationship out of it, only if you consider giving away sex as transactional, namely as leverage she can use or withold to get the outcome she wants. Entitled abov…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 04:24 PM
0

HVM make it NOT cheating by design. How? HVM have options, thus they simply do not agree to stay sexually exclusive. Sexual exclusivity is NOT part of the terms and conditions in the relationship contract. Cheating is constituted by breach of trust. There can NOT be breach of trust regarding him staying sexually exclusive, when the HVM never agreed to stay sexually exclusive in the first place. As long as the HVM never established the expectation for him to stay sexually exclusive, it simply can…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/21 05:16 PM
5

Reminds me of a story from yesterday: Woman legally adopted 2 kids (2 different fathers) from her druggie partying sister. It was planned for the sister to stay in contact with the kids, but she never did. Some years past and the sister found her BB. Now she is trying to regain the two kids via slandering her sister, filling false reports sending CPS (or similar) onto her and the other usual stuff. "I need to get my kids in my life"? They were, until they were cast aside.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/03/21 08:13 AM
58

Anti-porn men: "Porn consumption is rewarding yourself for doing nothing. It stiffles your drive for improvement." Anti-porn women: "Why is she getting paid for sex, when I have to pay for sex????"
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/21 09:05 AM
24

This is typical. She can't even get an average man. What is she doing? Setting up insane standards, so that she can fingerpoints towards it and say: "I am not settling, I know my worth!" She rather creates plausible deniability for herself on why she is free aka alone, than getting someone on her level: an below average man. Protecting her ego for the outside world, antidepressants and wine at night for her inside world. Dying alone.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/01/21 03:55 AM
0

Not "nice", it's "nice guy". Being a "nice guy" is constituted by a certain set of traits, none of which are about physical attraction standards. No problem with "wholesome guy", since it's the equivalent to "wholesome girl" and indeed has sexual attraction involved via well-being improvement. And no, it's not about sementics, 'cause the terms are not interchangeable.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 01:52 PM
2

That is your interpretation of those words. ...based on definitions, without having to redefine either. Per definition...? Yes. The dictionary definition "good for you, and likely to improve your life either physically, morally, or emotionally" involves mechanisms that constitute improved well-being. Attraction and/or sexual arousal are part of that. You bring up a specific type of woman you've (and other posters in this thread) apparently have met, which we neither can verify or witness through…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 12:46 PM
1

Who exactly has done that here? In this thread? Don't know, who in this thread is a woman in question. If you wanna know, ask around. Never claimed someone by name, since topic at hand was about what women in question do and not which women in the subreddit are the women in question. The problem of gesturing at imagined hypocrisy is that you can re-tell argument's you've heard sans context or verifiability, to ad-hoc fit the premise that your opponent is being internally inconsistent. Yes, but l…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 11:22 AM
2

Topic at hand is NOT one person saying x, another saying y, thus... Topic at hand was the women in question saying "I wish I could find a good guy" with the meaning "I want a man I find sexually attractive to be a decent human who treats me well and others with common decency" and the consequent question of "Is this reasonable as implied subtext or downplaying of their attraction standards, standards they themselves hold when called out for, but otherwise criticise when uttered by men?" There is…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 10:38 AM
10

Calling the women in question out for snow flaking does not constitute needing someone to lay out everything piece by piece. Men already know the underlying assumptions, thus they recognize dishonest talking points as snow flaking in the first place and call it out. The polar opposite of what you are saying is observable reality: Redpill men tell men to get in shape. Incel guys tell men to at least engage in looks-maxxing. Blackpillers lose hope completely, due to what they call unreachable beau…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 03:49 AM
10

And that bit of the messages leaking was probably C. It was C's family. They wanted to make sure he can't continue the affair with her and thereby waste his time. Smart move.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/01/21 12:30 PM
10

do you think your partner is entitled to you staying attractive for them and vice versa? It's not entitlement, it's a reasonable expectation in a relationship. Letting oneself go is lacking self-respect and lacking respect for the partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 09:22 AM
1

But now instead of not talking to girls because they're afraid of rejection they can say that they're "mgtow" or "blackpilled". Mgtow = doing what oneself wants. Can include only banging, can mean casually dating, can mean paying escorts. Your obvious strawman is obvious. "blackpill" isn't redpill. Blackpill are bluepillers, who get to know redpill truths and can't act accordingly. Your obvious strawman is obvious. Let's be real: Having bluepill guys crying over redpill truths doesn't make them …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/20 07:00 PM
54

You are underselling it: She was sleeping around after her college "love" failure. For three years. Low ball estimate is 50 people. 5 years non-mono relationship aka she is seeking out attention whenever she is sad about her non-relationship. Let's say that happened 3 times a year. That's 1+15. She dated 100 people in 2 years, let's say she took the first of the three years off for therapy and let it stay at 100. Conservative estimate is at least every fourth. 25. 91 people + her college "love" …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/12/20 02:58 PM
1

But here's the thing so many men don't Express their competent for parenthood until the kid is actually born. It's on the woman to start a vetting process for that beforehand and not just after the fact, just like it's on the man to start a vetting process for other things, not just hope for the best beforehand and have a moan after the fact. How could we make this more fair as a society? Contractual agreement. It's transparent and fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/20 09:53 PM
30

'cause women have reproductive rights, men do not. A man can't force a woman to keep a baby or terminate a pregnancy. A woman can decide either even against the wishes of the father. Having those reproductive rights means having the face the consequences of either keeping or terminating. Not having reproductive rights ---> no reasonable expectation of having to stay around by default. Moral obligation to stay in the kid's life is constituted by 1. telling the pregnant woman, that one is willing …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/20 09:17 PM
5

Caring about her man's wellbeing and not wanting the burden of his emotions is not mutually exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/20 03:08 AM
1

A woman caring about her man and not wanting the burden of his emotion, but being able to put hers onto him is not mutually exclusive. Your talking point failed instantly based on your flawed assumption.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/20 03:07 AM
7

"Being emotional" does not include all emotions, it's about not showing negative emotions or complaining during hard time. Being happy? Ok. Being angry? Let's be real: Angry man + angry woman equals good fighting, which results in excitement. Relationships need excitement and fighting is maybe the most common source of excitement. Crying over a pet dying? Acceptable, since there is no complaining involved. Complaining over work hours or emotional baggage? Problematic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/20 03:08 PM
60

Intellectual dishonesty. They know there is no such thing as toxic masculinity and whenever challenged to name examples, they deliver examples for lack of masculinity instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/20 12:54 PM
67

Yes. Women are only paying lip service. They don't want the burden of the man's emotions, they want him the shoulder hers.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/20 12:15 PM
179

Most men have heard this before “It’s okay for men to be emotional” but the question is, is it really? The answer is no. When women say they want their man to be more emotional, they actually mean emotionally more available. That means NOT being emotional himself, but more understanding of HER emotions and everything that comes with it. For women the best case is a stoic man, who is supportive and understanding of her emotions.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/20 10:48 AM
4

Her second chance really was her friends trying to stop her. That was her chance to reconsider.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/20 02:41 PM
3

Answer: You don't, because it should matter.
/r/TheRedPillStories11/11/20 11:49 PM
1

Poor them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 01:33 PM
1

What is it? Are you an asshole to women or are you just preventing abovementioned tactics and antics? Not falling for manipulation tactics does not constitute being an asshole.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/20 11:59 AM
7

You said barely chubby. One pie away from being obese is not being barely chubby.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/20 09:25 PM
2

Complete strawman argument. TRP isn't arguing for what you are presenting. TRP is arguing for the polar opposite: Women getting with and/or marrying good hard working guys, who are willing to commit and invest resources into her and her children (beta provider), while banging guys, those she is actually attracted to, on the side (alpha f). They are only leaving the beta provider, should the hot guy also commit to invest resources into her and her children (the dream of finding the alpha with bet…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/20 06:11 PM
1

I am not in a relationship but I wouldn’t have an issue with dating a heavier girl What does "wouldn't have an issue" mean? Do you take what you can get, but you would prefer heavier girls/non-heavy girls or is there no preference at all? Let's say you are a chubby chaser...most men are not. Attraction is non-negotiablee, that's the answer. On top of that unhealthy body weight is associated with unhealthy life style habbits and bad character traits. Of course men AND women rather have than not h…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/20 12:59 AM
0

Since incels are blue pilled...no, they are not redpilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 07:57 PM
7

Not meaning to nitpick but strict "diets" do not work because if there are strict rules you will want to break them Even strict diets work. Bodybuilder all over the world engaging in either dirty or clean bulking followed by clean dieting to make themselves pre water cut stage ready. Martial artists, who have to make weight, can literally count how much to eat based on what they eat and can achieve their pre water cut goal every single time as long as they are able to follow the preplanned diet …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/10/20 10:22 AM
7

I also hate that gimmick. "dIeTs dOnT WoRk! Sticking to well planned out diets works. Not sticking to them doesn't work. Putting their inability regarding dieting onto the diets is the similar lack of personal responsability we are talking about.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/10/20 08:22 AM
2

Incels are blue pilled. Name dropping them doesn't help with your initial statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 01:41 AM
38

I hate that gimmick. Past behaviour is the best indicator for future behaviour. We know it. They know it. They know we know it. Nevertheless they are trying to shame people for pointing out red flags.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/10/20 08:01 PM
1

No reproductive rights ---> No forced child support Men should never be forced to pay child support. Child support should be constituted by contractual agreement. Woman is getting pregnant without having a contractual agreement regarding possible child support in place? It's on her, based on the sole reproductive right, to decide what to do without the moral or legal obligation for the man to pay. A woman is having sex, while lying about being on birth control? The man only consented to sex unde…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/20 07:56 AM
2

The premise of being able to "easily say no" is disregarding reality in the first place. It is NOT between men or women 1. getting pressured into sex or let's say 2. getting beaten up. It's between 1. getting pressured into sex or 2. getting beaten up without getting r*ped afterwards or 3. getting beaten up with getting r*ped afterwards. An equivalent is the typical robbery. It's not between 1. being pressured into handing over stuff or 2. getting stabbed, it's between 1. being pressured into ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/20 11:39 PM
3

"You can do the safest thing possible, but there is a reason they say no guts no glory." logical fallacy: "Even if you try to take the safest bets, you can still fail...so why try to be safe at all, lulz"
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/20 04:50 PM
6

Life is a gamble. ...and part of the gambling game is NOT the gamble on shitty odds.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/20 02:34 PM
2

N count matters if she had casual sex. If she had relationships, no one gives a fuck. Most men and women don't agree. A woman who is having (let's say) at least 1 "relationship" per month is called an undercover s-word by women and men have short-term relations with her, knowing the "relationship" will not survive long-term.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/20 02:32 PM
1

How much of an impediment is my balding going to be? Shaved head with good head structure > hair > bald with bad head structure
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/20 09:18 PM
1

Your grouping doesn't make sense. Secular people using redpill knowledge to get themselves good husbands and wives are more likely right wing conservatives, yes. The majority of TRP follower are NOT following the conservative dating ideas of marriage and kids. Most of them do not even want to cohabitate. No reason to label TRP right wing by default, when most TRP follower ending up doing the exact opposite of the conservative standard. Incels are blue pilled, putting women on a pedastal, disrega…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/20 11:11 AM
1

The older gals don't know he was fishing for younger...fish. How would they know? Let's say they know: Why justify anything? According to your scenario he can pick up other women, who don't disqualify themselves by asking obvious stupid questions. No need to justify himself.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/20 09:31 PM
1

Not only after politely asking, even without asking her out at all or even after him telling her to stop pursuing him! We already talked about people making shit up to get competition out of the way. Proven cases? Court cases. We know of people getting fired from at-will employment after false accusations, but being proven innocence by winning defamation court cases afterwards or at least forced retraction of the false allegations via cease and desist. We know of people winning wrongful terminat…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/20 11:06 PM
12

Your experience is limited to what you find attractive and what other women say. Men's experience is based on how every woman reacts and behaves towards them. Exactly this. I would love to remind everyone of "paying lip service". This concept exists and judging by what people are saying, without them also displaying it, is a bad pathway to finding truth. A woman is saying she doesn't care about height, but all her hook ups and boyfriends were at least 6'0''? What are the chances for this funny c…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/20 06:11 AM
0

But in your comment you mentioned that it’s a shit test for commitment, so it’s implied that the guy is shit testing because he IS interested in commitment I literally stated, and I quote: "Most men do NOT actively seek out an relationship, they are at most open to one and it's on you to present yourself as an possible partner." Like I said "When they are open for a relationship, they will also push for sex to see if you showcase slut tells". Being open for commitment in general and running the …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 05:34 AM
1

This doesn't even make sense. Every men can try NOT to fuck. Not every man CAN try to fuck and get away with it. If a man can, why wouldn't he try? Running the shit test simply does make sense, regardless of whether he 1. gets sex on the first date and disqualifies her for any long-term relationship or 2. she passes the test without showcasing slut tells and has sex with him later on or 3. he disqualifies her should she continue with lacking sexual interest. The guy looks bad/desperate in the ey…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 04:50 AM
1

No, it wasn't helpful advice. Most men do NOT actively seek out an relationship, they are at most open to one and it's on you to present yourself as an possible partner. When they want sex, they will push for sex. When they are open for a relationship, they will also push for sex to see if you showcase slut tells. It's a shit test to determine your level of promiscuity. They rush things? Don't go along with it and thereby pass the test. They rush things and you disqualify them for it? You just d…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/20 02:40 AM
2

People don't understand what "being oneself" even means. You are who you are based on your behaviour. Your behaviour can be confident or unsettled. Either is you being you. If you can't make the cut your "you" wasn't good enough. Someone is acting and lying? It doesn't make sense to say to him or her to just rather be himself or herself. The person is himself or herself by lying and pretending, those are traits that constitute someone being who he or she is. " Not everyone can get laid with hot …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/20 05:02 AM
1

"Genotype and outer factors produce phenotype. Therefore phenotype can be seen as a function of two variables, and when you change any of them, expect the function to change as well." Yes. Typical soft determinism. Already mentioned it. But you are not talking soft determinism. It's the typical hard predeterministic fever dream to say "It's either genetics...or outer influence and being susceptible to those influences is also genetically predetermined..." "I agree with this, but then it is also …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 05:19 PM
1

"This still treats ideology as a completely separate from biology entity, rather than a product of biology itself." "And that's the thing: it is their biology that makes them accept this ideology. It is biology of authors of this ideology that made them produce such an ideology." I disagree. Ideology is based on philosophical and/or logical reasoning. Neither is solely based on your genetic make-up. It can support "biology" or deny it. Your narrative is biological/cognitive (pre)determinism: "Yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 03:51 PM
1

"but there is no evidence that ideological goals and biological goals are different." We already had some guy in the thread who explained how biological goals seen in humans are also observable in the animal kingdom, thus there must be biological goals untouched from ideology. "My argument is that ideology can come from biology." Yes, just like ideology can actively battle abovementioned biological goals like self-preservation, both long-term and short-term. Example: anti-natalism movements that…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 02:47 PM
1

"I actually reacted." "I said that if it is not so, then what is the support of your argument?" So...you reacted by doubling down on your misrepresentation instead of answering the question on where you were getting your narrative from? Btw topic at hand was biological incentive vs social structure. My narrative was about even with changing social structures, biological incentives do not change. I mentioned how HVW still want men, although they should not need them according to your ideology bas…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 01:31 PM
1

Of course I have proof. There was plausible deniability of you not intentionally lying. As soon as I asked you about your faulty statement and you did not react, but au contraire even continued making an argumentation out of it, plausible deniability of it only being negligence was off the table.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 01:06 PM
1

I don't have to believe anything, it's demonstrably. I was able to quote you on your lies and misrepresentation. I was able to quote me on asking you about abovementioned misrepresentation. I was able on fingerpoint how you continued with your narrative based on the misrepresentation even after being called out. You lost credibility every single step of the way and now you are engaging in textbook projection to prevent the cognitive dissonance from eating you alive.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 01:00 PM
1

It's a sign of lacking personal responsibilty to pretend having to admit dishonest and disingenuous behaviour would constitute monkey dancing. Doubling down on disingenuous behaviour it is...who would have thought?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 12:55 PM
1

And don't just say you were wrong. You actively tried to lie and get away with it. It wasn't just a simple mistake. You are being held accountable for your behaviour for once.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 12:51 PM
1

Name the things you retract. I do not accept a generalized throw away apology.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 12:49 PM
1

Can you read? I already told you, that you can NOT weasel your way out of admitting 1. making shit up and 2. lying. Admit to it and retract your statements.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 12:47 PM
1

"I did not actually make any claim." "I only said that you seem to think so. (and started argumentation based on that, got interrupted by you calling me out)" Pick one: It's either or neither. Can't be both. Example: Me: "Biological wiring wants your genes to survive." Meaning? Persons sense of self-preservation and the logical extension of it "passing on genes" as long-term self-preservation. What are you making out of it? "Okay, you assume that all genes (or genomes) have their imperative as m…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 12:39 PM
1

I was the one who called you out. You are the one who has to deliver or retract. Pretending otherwise is not going to fly.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 12:08 PM
1

I am waiting for the quote or the retraction. I do not allow you to bullshit your way out of admitting making shit up. Rug sweeping is no more, my dear. Edit: "Let's speak evolutionary. Before modern technology has appeared." Before modern technology gays fathered children, gay females got pregnant by males.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 12:04 PM
9

I would never ever ignore it. It's fun to call them out even further. "Funny how calling out behaviour indicative of infidelity or disrespect is named 'being insecure' and not holding someone responsible for one's own behaviour. If you can't wrap your head around the concept of personal responsibility, I am willing to gleefully explain this concept and any other concept to you, that constitutes someone being an functioning adult. If you don't want to learn how to conduct yourself as an adult hum…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 11:44 AM
1

"Okay, you assume that all genes (or genomes) have their imperative as making copies of themselves. This is what I am telling you: it is not the case." Never said that. Can you please stop throwing everything at the wall in hopes something sticks? I called you out in my last comment and you are doing exactly what I implied you would try. I will hold you over the fire now and tell you to either quote me directly on it or retract your statement. "Say, being a gay is not an ideology (I am not talki…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 11:25 AM
1

Tell me how you come to this conclusion. I would love for you to stay consistent in your narrative from now on.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 10:57 AM
1

"You assume that everyone's goal is to spread genes." It is biological speaking. "There always will be people who will place other goals above spreading genes." No shit. Many people in this thread have called this out as disregarding biological incentives in favour of ideological ones. You were the one denying this, only to come full circle again.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 10:51 AM
1

I could argue that people living in houses also is against biological wiring. But you see, those who claim feminism is battling human nature for some reason want people to live in houses with extended families, not tribes. They are just uneducated or hypocrites. Let's try it. Biological wiring wants your genes to survive. Is housing with extended family or even only nucular family inferior to living in tribes regarding having your genes passed on? The answer is no, au contraire societies with fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 10:37 AM
1

You could try to argue that, but you would get obliterated.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 10:24 AM
1

Yes and this change of social structure based on ideology, that is actively battling biological wiring has already been called out.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 09:36 AM
44

"You are insecure" Translation: "You called out my bullshit and now I have to derail the conversation via guilt-tripping and shaming tactics"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 06:42 AM
2

Yes, BB is the only way for most LVM to get sex and family life. No, low value men don't have to be glad that they can get with leftover low value women. The LVW need the BB bail out from the LVM more than he needs anything from her.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 06:36 AM
1

"Like, if marrying a high-ranking man is not the best way to increase a woman's own status why would she do that" Biological incentive to secure a man long-term. Having the government point a loaded gun at men is the easiest way to prevent the man from dropping the relationship. "and not follow the best way to increase her own status?" It's not mutually exclusive. Even if she thinks being a career woman is most desirable, still she will try to get a partner nevertheless. Why a partner with more …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/20 05:51 AM
2

The biological incentive in question is observable reality. "Then status already should matter little to young women" is solely based on ideology. With increasing social standing of women, their requirements also increases. Observable reality shows: Even career women of high status want men of higher status than them, thus they are in a bad dating market position and they are having a moan about it, since HVM are rather dating younger women with time to invest in said men, while those career wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 11:15 AM
2

"Should" according to ideology disregarding biological incentive.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/20 10:11 AM
20

Thing is, she says they decided to take a break.. but the fact is, SHE decided to take a break, because it's carte blanche to flirt/tease/fuck other guys without "TECHNICALLY CHEATING".. even though it's literally saying "I'm going to fuck other people so we're going to separate briefly so I can do so without feeling guilty for being a cheating whore, despite being a cheating whore." When she says "He decided", what she means is she suggested it, then pushed and cajoled him into agreeing. That's…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/07/20 04:58 AM
9

I agree. It's about receiving currency. This currency can be: monetary, attention and/or validation, connections Sleeping with guys to receive attention? Prostitution Sleeping with guys to get a promotion? Prostitution
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/06/20 04:33 AM
0

"an attitude that is warped from overconsumption of prostitution (cam girls, porn stars, etc)" I am anti-porn. Why are you engaging in poisoning the well right from the start? Don't you want to be taken seriously? Here is the problem: "I don't like your talking points...because of...reasons which makes the talking point immoral and thus I don't even have to adress them" is no substitute for actually adressing them. "Part of the problem is we look at relationships from “transactional” point of vi…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 09:33 AM
2

Exactly this. Sexual relations and relationships are transactional. No person wants to invest into someone to get something, when others already got or can get that something for fewer resources or even free. That's just a bad business transaction. A man is making romantic gestures towards his new girlfriend, just because he gets sex from her? His ex will complain, that she also had sex with him, but additionally invested time (cleaning, cooking) and she never received romantic gestures. Bad bus…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 03:22 AM
1

TRP standard is that you do NOT tell a woman you are interested in a committed relationship. Telling her would kill all incentive for her to put in work. The polar opposite is the case: You make her earn your commitment, you do not throw it at her. "TRP is telling men to lie about wanting a relationship?" Since TRP is a toolbox based on observable reality and not advocating for one single strategy, your talking point is exposed as a strawman argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/20 04:29 PM
1

"There's no way I could sleep at night knowing that I lead on 2-5 women by telling them that I want a committed relationship just so I could have sex with them. The red pill advocates for this, and to me" TRP is a toolbox based on observable reality. TRP standard is that you do NOT tell a woman you are interested in a committed relationship. Telling her would kill all incentive for her to put in work. The polar opposite is the case: You make her earn your commitment, you do not throw it at her. …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/20 04:25 PM
8

Most basic dating rule: You make HER earn your attention, you do not SIMP for her. As soon as you have Simp'd for her even just once, you have established an precedent you will never escape again.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/06/20 08:47 AM
3

The guy already made an update: He is leaving.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/06/20 08:43 AM
3

"And men want sex but not her as a person" Yes, consenting adults freewillingly engaging in sexual relations without wanting to commit to a exclusive relationship is a thing. No one is entitled to anything, it's amoral. A human is body and mind. Appreciation for a beautiful body can't be dehumanizing, since the human body in itself is part of what constitutes being a human. Dehumanization by showing affection for what constitutes being a human in the first place? Nope. A women desiring productiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/20 05:09 AM
14

...and guess what? Those groups are getting called out by other men! Can you guess what is not happening to the female equivalent of those groups? Yes, those rarely get called out by other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/20 04:26 AM
4

Go figure...if you admit you consider it subjective, your narrative is not surviving basic scrutiny. "Reading the room" is neither preventing people from feeling "harassed" nor is it preventing people from making up "feeling harassed" to get an advantage out of playing the victim. "Not harassing people is also very simple and you won’t get fired for say, politely asking someone out." Intellectually dishonest and demonstrably false. The concept of microaggressions itself shows the problem: One ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/20 07:47 AM
9

You are as dodgy as you are preachy. Can you please answer a question for once? "You have to read the room" is NOT an adequate answer to the question "What constitutes sexual harassment?" Here is the problem: You are giving the typical microaggression talking point, but you don't want to openly admit, that claims of harassment can be completely subjective based on the mentioned microaggression concept. This lack of objective standards in favour of arbitrary subjectivism is the reason why men rig…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/20 03:51 AM
16

She gave herself away with all the "I can't read him, I can't figure him out, I don't know how he feels about me" talking. Jezz, she talked about the difficulty of reading him at least six times. Her not being the center of his attention via him trying to get with her, although she is reaching out? That's making him attractive to her. Should he be the one to make to move onto her, mystery is gone and thus attraction is gone.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/06/20 05:43 AM
1

Exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/20 01:17 AM
3

Der Jude is right. Stay in the observable reality: You are asking how to turn the ex-GF turned hoe into your GF again, BECAUSE your attempt at reconciliation went wrong based on her having all the options as a young girl. You are asking: Why does she take casual sex over what we had? Der Katzenjude gave the answer: Fixing problems after the fact doesn't secure her taking you back. Again: Her pair bonding ability is damaged from all the casual sex already, there is no going back from this.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/20 01:11 AM
1

Der Jude is right. She already fried her brain with casual sex, she isn't even the same person anymore, thus he is mourning a person that doesn't exist anymore. He has Oneitis. How to overcome it? 1. He must admit to himself, that he is chasing the idea of her, not the real existing changed person right meow. Get to know other girls in the real existing non-dream world.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/20 01:01 AM
2

She hasn't moved onto anyone lol. She is enjoying a period of casual sex. Translation: Many people have moved into her, casually. That is her moving on. She moved on from her first "real" relationship straight into her hoe phase. Let's say you have changed every single of your problems for the better, you still have to keep in mind: She already fried her brain with casual sex. Her pair bonding ability is damaged, she isn't the same person anymore. ---> You are dreaming about getting back with a …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/20 12:54 AM
6

"I really loved him." "Actually Its so difficult to move out too." "also i am monogamous. I want to love only one person my whole life." Re-read the different parts of your post. Do you still love him, like at all? It sounds like you still love to idea of what you thought he was + "I want to love only one person my whole life". Your self-expectation pretty much forces you to continue loving the idea of him. Not his actions, not his current or future behaviour. Additionally it's "difficult to mov…
/r/RedPillWomen14/06/20 05:17 AM
6

Child support is not unfair, is not supported by the state. It's not only supported by the state, it's constituted by the state. A free market model of child support would be based on a contractual agreement. No contract during conception? No child support! Is abovementioned the status quo or can the government force you via threat of violence and bodily harm to pay child support you have not agreed upon, even if it turns out you are not the father, but failed to contest within the statue of lim…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/20 11:13 AM
3

If this is only a one-sided obsession...it's even worse.
/r/RedPillWomen11/06/20 04:56 AM
5

According to the comment section you asked him and he said he is over her. That's the story he is telling himself to feel better. Don't believe his words, believe his actions. He is still friends with her, but not the guys? Special treatment for her + he is giving her social media attention and validation via liking her slutty photos + he still has photos of them together on his accounts, although she eliminated his presence from her accounts. He can't be with her anymore, because he can't trust…
/r/RedPillWomen11/06/20 03:25 AM
10

I’d say you probably overestimate the extent to which ‘fuckboys’ actually need to lie to get laid and underestimate women’s own responsibility in being ‘used’ this way Exactly this. You have a guy and a woman. Both want to bang. There simply is no talk about commitment before hooking up. The commitment talk is brought on the table AFTER the fact. Basically what OP is saying: "The guy not telling her he isn't available for commitment is constituting him lying to her by default, since her seeking …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/20 12:55 AM
2

"is her advice accurate?" Not for you, I will explain what I mean by that. First of all her advice is aimed for "A specific type of women, who is interested in upgrading her lifestyle", who want to get multi millionaires and billionaires. She is going on british television and claims she can teach you how to bag an billionaire + "she advises ladies on how to enter high society and 'transform themselves' to 'live up to their potential' ". Can she love a poor man? "Well, I don't think I could, bec…
/r/RedPillWomen09/06/20 02:39 AM
1

Exactly this. Insurance + daddy government takes care of the financial side, women receive an massive ego boost via praise from society for staying with the husband, all while they can bang other people on the side anyway should they be still young and attractive enough to find someone. Staying with the husband while waiting for a better affair and/or even an long-term partner has no downside for them. Staying with the husband by default due to old age and thereby low SMV has also no downside.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/20 02:14 AM
1

Are we talking about an off-button or an on-/off-button? Switching off sexual attraction long-term isn't for me, since I have no problems getting it without having to invest unnecessary resources. It's relaxing and therefore as long as I have enough free time, it isn't distracting. Switching off sexual attraction temporarily whenever it would be distracting? Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/20 10:26 PM
1

A 4/10 woman, who has never had a Chad, is still acting like a 8 or 9, because the average and slightly below average men are trying to bang her in the end of the night when they have nothing else going, thinking she is an easy target...because she is below average. This quantity of attention alone from non-Chads makes her act out like a 8 or a 9, because she thinks the attention comes based of her high value...when it's actually the opposite. A woman who thinks of herself as high value should r…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 12:24 AM
8

Men with resources are in demand. The resources can be beauty, money, connection. And neither men with any of those traits or combination of traits is commiting to the low value women in question, thus their mental breakdowns on social media, in real life, in online articles. Even the average Joe can snatch an average woman, after she reevalued her true value. Wanna guess who can't get long-term commitment from a men she demands commitment from? Sluts/"former" sluts, who disregard actual market …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/20 06:19 PM
11

Funny how women are demanding commitment...and getting declined according to women themselves. "Men are the buyers" only should they buy what the women in question have to offer. They don't, therefore they aren't. This is the problem: You are talking in self-glorifying tumblr memes. Women openly stating, that they have problems to get the men they want to commit to them. How would you try to help those women? Telling them "You are the ones in demand" as if this lie changes their experiences on t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/20 05:57 PM
6

Your narrative doesn't even make sense. The value of "the bill in the pocket" is not determined by what oneself thinks it should be valued, but the demand on the dating market. That's why my and other men's bill is crisp based on demand for us, while demand for the women in question is low. This is observable reality based on the dynamics in the dating market and the women in question have a moan about it, openly, many times a week: "Online dating leaves middle-aged women in 'single wilderness '…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/20 05:38 PM
12

Nope. It's about her value. She doesn't have the same youthful beauty anymore + long-lasting damage regarding pair bonding ability. Her value is lower than the value of her former self, thus she is over-estimating her value by demanding more investment for less in return. She wants MY commitment. I am the one with the valuable crisp 100 dollar bill she can't get. Should not have offered herself for 20s in her 20s, when she could have asked for 100. Now it's too late.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/20 05:06 PM
7

Low? There is a correlation between cheating and sex partners. 10 isn't a low number for a woman to be considered a hoe, when the rapid decline in pair bonding ability starts way earlier. Here is the problem: Your definition of what constitutes a slut is influnced by the average woman's body count. "The average body count by age X is 20? This means 20 can't be the threshold for being a slut, right? It's just normal dating, right?" Wrong. Being a slut is constituted by a pattern of attention and …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/20 05:01 PM
17

Exactly. Relationships are not unconditional, they are very much conditional, namely transactional. You don't want to invest in someone to receive something, that others got from the same person for less or even free. Why? Market value is a thing. Feeling stupid about bad business decisions is a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/20 04:39 PM
6

Yeah, Its been a rather tumultuous relationship. I feel so shamed and not myself anymore. "What does one do in this crazy mess?" you asked. Come on, be happy it's over.
/r/RedPillWomen25/05/20 03:51 PM
52

"Until i opened up to him about the guys handsyness on the bike. He was furious." Of course, he already asked you about it and you simply derailed the conversation. "He said hes going to make that guy say sorry if we ever saw him again. I said, he was high! He will probably nor remember anything." You can imagine this sounds like you are making excuses for the guy. Doesn't matter if he was high, holding him accountable for his behaviour is not based on his level of self-induced drug abuse. "He s…
/r/RedPillWomen25/05/20 02:22 AM
1

They can't admit to it, because they simply want to keep guilt tripping men about being shallow in their arsenal. If they are showcasing an more open double standard, they are going to get called out on it and lose abovementioned guilt trippy weapon.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/20 01:26 AM
16

"Bearing in mind that I'm the submissive one!" Yeah, that's what I get from the text. It seems he lost himself and nevertheless you are pretty...soft on him. And the following statement is showcasing the problem "Especially since he cannot give me an example of what I do to 'make' him feel that way." You didn't disrespect him or have shown similar emasculating behaviour. HE himself emasculated himself and now he is putting it on you. You calling him out does not constitute emasculating him, he d…
/r/RedPillWomen20/05/20 12:54 AM
1

Relationships are transactional. A woman can only offer sex? The man can only take sex! That is on the woman, not the man. "I honestly think society has created the belief that in order for a man to be cool and manly he needs a lot of casual hookups to prove his worth, and so men feel they have to fuck women left and right, but in reality, just like us, you desire romance, a connection, and love." You have it upside down. Women are being taught that casual hook ups are without consequences and t…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/20 05:47 AM
2

I didn't miss the part, I question your sanity to use it as an excuse. Stop being defensive.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/20 10:33 PM
2

Wait what? A girl starting fucking around with 15, 1 sex partner per month, has 60 sex partner by the age of 20. That isn't considered a high n-count according to your guideline. But it is, isn't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/20 12:27 AM
2

"But I am worried that he might leave her or send her nsfw pictures to other people." Yes, if he is participating in something that can be considered "Boy's club", peer pressure will most likely make him share the pic with at least the single guys at the very latest as soon as she is an ex.
/r/RedPillWomen09/05/20 04:45 PM
1

Seriously. Regarding the baby: She was one of those mothers, who are holding the baby all the time. Sleeping baby? In her arms. Basically he had to fight to get a hold of the baby every single time. Some time later his mother visited. It took days for her to hold the baby for the first time after many discussions. Regarding the divorce threats: She emasculated him and of course lost respect for him. Whatever she wanted she pushed on him. This created the precedent of her being the sole leader of…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 09:36 PM
1

The guy worked on the oil rig, oil refinery and associated pipelines in Columbia and the two found each other there. Yes, they are together and she is steamrolling all over him. They had the child and on of the first things afterwards is her treatening divorce, should he disagree with her. Didn't even feel scripted to add drama. The dude wasn't allowed to hold the baby, ffs.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 06:15 PM
3

Can't believe I have to defend the main show, but some couples really love each other. Couples were dating for years before the K1-Visa, with the US citizen visiting the other person multiple times and now having children. From the 40 couples of the main show: Married with children - 15 Married - 14 Married and pregnant - 1 Married with one person in prison, about to get divorced - 1 Engaged - 1 Engaged, but clearly a scam to get money. No intentions to marry - 1 Back together after seperation -…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 05:25 PM
7

It's not the point of this show. 90day fiance is about foreigners coming to the USA and wanting to marry, K1-Visa is already granted. The guy named Ed from the picture is part of 90day fiance: before the 90 days. This show is about the US citizen coming to the foreigner's country to check them out, K1-Visa not yet in play. The guy lied about his height, appearence, plans on having more kids. He got paid by the TV show to basically be a sex tourist, getting the girl drunk and bang her, knowing he…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 04:46 PM
8

He never wanted to wife her up, he is basically a not-paying but paid sex tourist. She wants 2 more kids and he stayed silent about wanting a vasectomy for the longest time knowing this is a dealbreaker.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 04:10 PM
5

"My favorite is the girl from Columbia who came to the US to be with this dude who claimed he was rich, but actually lived with his parents on some farm in the middle of bum fuck nowhere and she was like so shocked." Oh, yeah. The guy was an oil rig engineer and lived half the time where ever the company send him and the other half at home with the parents. They had 90 days to get married, he was on alert for work and his company wanted to send him away days before the weeding. Therefore he had …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 04:07 PM
1

Everyone should have some home gym equipment.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 04:49 AM
1

And what percentage of steroid users aren't lifting, haha? How pointless would that be? The steroid lifter, who is injured, keeps using steroids to maintain mass, while being unable to lift. Steroid non-lifting isn't the substitute for steroid lifting, it's becoming the necessaty when the situation calls for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 10:49 PM
2

That's bigorexia. I have the same problem. On your own you don't feel muscular enough, but standing next to the average man you feel like a million bucks. As a steroid-free dude you should never ever compare yourself with the steroid crew in the gym, or even with the full-time lifter.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 10:09 PM
3

Yes, they had a study about it. Sedentary steroid user made more gains than steriod-free lifters. Steroid using lifters made more gains than sedentary steroid user and steroid-free lifters combined.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 10:01 PM
7

You need to develope a feeling for the basics. Potatoes, rice, lentils, pasta. Those can be used in different meals, therefore getting familiar with their cooking times is important. Watch videos, follow instructions. You will learn abovementioned cooking times, basic sauces and how to stir fry vegetables and roast meat. Taste is individual, seasoning is something you can figure out according to your palate later on, just follow the recommended amounts of seasoning in recipes for now.
/r/RedPillWomen07/05/20 09:54 PM
35

"Context on the girl: She is his older sisters best friend, she is well- acquainted with his family and they have known each other for years now" Childhood crush alert "Frankly, he has never asked me if I am okay with this trip and does know I am not okay with" "He did not ask me at all if I was okay with this and just informed me of their new camping plans on a phone call later that day, I was pissed and angry. Should I just give up?" Even if he isn't interested in her, he is also not intereste…
/r/RedPillWomen06/05/20 07:05 AM
1

"He have never called me bro" He called you bro, because that's how he is speaking to his buddies all the time. When he recognized his unusual wording, he was trying to make it less weird by saying "well you're one of my best friends." It was a one time thing. No reason to overanalyze.
/r/RedPillWomen25/04/20 04:19 PM
5

she was trying to make him attached you know by saying oh you were missing me or when do you miss me etc. Your bf knows this isn't some normal texting between friends and that's why he is playing being hurt, that you don't trust him and that you think he will cheat. He is accusing you of exactly the manipulative behaviour he is enaging in. He is the one having fake outrage about getting his feelings hurt to manipulate you into doubting your reasonable suspicion regarding his behaviour. Why shoul…
/r/RedPillWomen24/04/20 07:09 PM
3

"Men calculating what makes a good LTR has nothing to do with what men fall in love with." You are shifting the goalpost. Your narrative was about men not caring about the traits in question. I gave both examples of falling in love based on said traits and vetting based on said traits. Now you pretend, that I only mentioned vetting procedures for LTR. I will make it even more clear: Men care so much so for the traits in question, that they NOT ONLY fall in love based on them, additionally those …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/20 02:12 PM
10

You are conflating two different things. Men don't care about personality regarding sex, just like women do not care. We do not talk about sex aka lust at first sight, we are talking about love. Regarding love and relationships "a woman's personalities, hobbies , interests and achievements" are determining factors that make the difference between just lust and love. A woman being disqualified for a long-term relationship by a man is based on those abovementioned traits. You are pretending that m…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/20 05:25 AM
6

I disagree. Staying with her family serves the purpose of them vetting him and him vetting her in her natural habitat. Them putting him into a hotel tells him about their inability to accommodate house guests and about their willingness to dodge upcoming vetting procedures. Big red flags he should not accept.
/r/RedPillWomen21/04/20 07:52 AM
2

It wasn't his fault that he wasn't more forthcoming, he followed the generic protocol called plausible deniability. A man is asking to see x at the woman's home? That's the universal code for "We both know we will get physical, I just deliver a reason for you to invite me in, so that you don't feel cheap." The polar opposite of your narrative is the case for most women: Not giving a woman plausible deniability and straight out asking if she wants physical activity is considered rude, since it su…
/r/RedPillWomen08/04/20 09:57 AM
2

" These where dude who took what they wanted with out any remorse. " Dude, you are agreeing with me. If they take what they want without any remorse, than that's based on lacking moral values. Namely the typical male gender values of men being the protector. You have given an example of lacking masculinity. That's toxic lack of masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/20 03:22 AM
4

There is no such thing as "toxic masculinity". Whenever women talk about "toxic masculinity" and we observe what they are actually talking about...it's always lack of masculinity. They critizise behaviour mostly found in men raised by a single mothers. Lack of father figures and male role models aka lack of masculinity is to blame. They are talking about "rape culture"? That's based on the destruction of typical gender roles and consequently feminized men not seeing themselves as protectors of w…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/20 03:07 AM
7

Most women won't and here is why: Even bi women love masculine men. Homo sex, especially taking dick, is seen as submissive and emasculating.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/20 02:12 AM
1

"just thought it was interesting" Not really. Movie directors are casting people NOT based on peak beauty aka your "being the hottest women" narrative, but ability to act the role.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/20 11:00 AM
2

Ok, I correct myself: "Platonic" relationship business or hobby related, basically being acquaintances...yes. Woman is ugly? Doesn't matter. The advantages you will get from this "relationship" aren't based on anything regarding the topic at hand. Platonic isn't even the right word to use in those cases: "intimate and affectionate but not sexual"? Shared interests or experiences related acquaintances with ugly girls aren't emotional (intimate or affectionate), they are convenient. The same with …
/r/askTRP05/04/20 12:03 PM
3

Either he is a beta orbiter and will try to torpedo your relationship with her or he already banged her. There are no platonic relationships between men and women. Either it's a celestial object-orbiter relationship or it was/is sexual. From my own experience: In the last 15 years I was "good friends" with about 8 girls. It got sexual with 6. Only 2 times it stayed non-sexual, although those 2 were trying to get with me. A girl having a male best friend is a disqualifier for a LTR.
/r/askTRP05/04/20 08:59 AM
2

"that’s textbook for an unhealthy relationship" Yes. "I don’t know why that stuff seems to be fading." He can control you via denying you love and attention and giving it back only sometimes. It's leaving you thirsty for more and is keeping the sparks of hope alive. Basically he faked being a whole other person and this gimmick right now is his real him. "I keep thinking if I try harder it’ll come back and he’ll be who he was for that first year - the person I happily moved 60 miles for." It's w…
/r/RedPillWomen04/04/20 09:20 PM
0

Ok, I have to ask: What is he doing for you? He isn't respecting you as a person. He is annoying you into submission. He isn't taking care of your emotional needs. He isn't taking care of your physical needs. Are you in love with the man you hope he could be or are you loving him? Why?
/r/RedPillWomen04/04/20 08:46 PM
1

"I’ve never cheated or flirted with another when going out for drinks with friends (whilst taken that is)" Think about the flirting you did while single and imagine taken people doing it AND actually trying to score. Drinking and cheating goes hand in hand, I have witnessed enough of it. Question: He is trying to hold you to the standard of not drinking while going out. Is he following his own standard?
/r/RedPillWomen04/04/20 08:36 PM
0

​ “you need to stop talking or I’ll lose my temper” He is losing frame. Not the best look. "(he doesn’t like me going out with friends and coming home after a few drinks, so the last one stemmed from me asking how I could have one drink with them, come home after and do so in a way that wouldn’t upset him)" Going out drinking is indicative of cheating and no man or woman of value will endorse this behaviour. Let me guess: You aren't allowed to, but he is getting hammered with his friends? That's…
/r/RedPillWomen04/04/20 08:20 PM
1

"Wanted to try" ---> regular part of her party lifestyle "working holiday in Australia" ---> "I made a holiday out of work" ---> fucked around on drugs She was a party slut on drugs, that's not only a red flag, but a crimson flag. Disqualified for any long-term relationship. Nevertheless there are subtitles based on how she told you this: "I did party drugs x once, didn't like it. I only want someone who isn't into it" is different than "I tell you what drugs I like and hope and tell me that you…
/r/askTRP04/04/20 07:53 PM
3

"I'm sure as soon as she finds some good dick, she'll move on." "I've been with two chicks since we broke up, but currently in monk mode trying to build an online business." "There's no way to get laid, as she's half way across the world, so I don't really have a set goal besides her keeping in mind that I use to pipe her real good and that im a MF boss" Here is the answer. She wants attention, because she is bored. Advantages of trying to keep her warm? None. Advantages of trying to be her frie…
/r/askTRP02/04/20 04:37 PM
1

Yes it does explain the low death rate as soon as you think about who was getting infected: "According to virologist Christian Drosten of Berlin's Charité Hospital, an increase in confirmed coronavirus cases in German nursing homes marks a new phase in the outbreak, as infections among the elderly are associated with more reported deaths." "Earlier in the day, it was confirmed that 23 residents - as well as 17 staff members - of a nursing home in Wildeshausen, Lower Saxony had been infected with…
/r/askTRP31/03/20 10:04 AM
30

China stopped testing, that's all. Every whistleblower is getting minecrafted. Nothing is in control over there.
/r/askTRP31/03/20 03:42 AM
21

That's due to our weaponized autism regarding human interactions. We are unfriendly and keeping our distance. The default behaviour is helpful regarding isolation.
/r/askTRP31/03/20 03:39 AM
1

Basic scrutiny test: How one-sided was the friendship? Did you put in much more effort and time and money than she did? Did you call her most of the time and/or did she call you only whenever she needed something?
/r/askTRP28/03/20 03:15 AM
1

"How do you live this 'monk mode'/disciplined lifestyle while also letting go, living in the moment, and having a DGAF attitude?" Timing. Be structured regarding your goals, keep the DGAF attitude regarding social events. You don't have to be and never should be either all the time.
/r/askTRP28/03/20 01:34 AM
2

"i want to reach out to let her know i still value our friendship without looking like a weakling for doing so. Any advice?" Don't. You are NOT in contact with her, you are simply not friends (anymore), more likely than not you two were never friends, but celestial body and orbiter. There is no scenario in which reaching out to confess non-existing friendship isn't coming off as desperate and weird.
/r/askTRP28/03/20 01:16 AM
0

Just tell her to. Her reaction: I don't do that... You: You will, if you want to spend time with me. Done deal. Killed her shit test.
/r/askTRP24/03/20 03:03 AM
30

"She tells me she's feeling unwell and the doctor told her it'll take 2 weeks for her to feel better." She has the Corona Virus or at least was in contact with someone, who has it. Doctor told her to self-quarantine. Later she is thinking "Fuck it, no symptoms/don't care and I want some." You said, that it doesn't work for you that day anymore. She said she was okay with meeting the next day, but in reality she was butthurt that you didn't jump when she called you over. Right now she is shit tes…
/r/askTRP22/03/20 03:20 PM
0

"At the same time though, “cat ladies” or women who choose to be alone rather than getting a beta are heavily mocked." Weird take on the term. Cat ladies are women, who wanted a family, waited to long and ended up with multiple cats as substitute for kids they never had. Loneliness, wine every day, all those things are part of the gimmick. The "Cat lady" you are talking about has nothing to do with someone staying (married or unmarried) childfree freewillingly, that's just being childfree. Those…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 06:45 PM
1

The body positivity and body acceptance movement was supposed to be for burn victims, people with missing limbs, birth marks, birth defects. It was about dealing with and accepting conditions people don't have in their hands and can't change. Today the movement is about removing oneself from the consequences of one's own actions. People are eating themselves in an early gravet? They would love to have it labelled hate speech should anyone point out the dangerous medical misinformation their are …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/20 12:44 PM
1

This. It sounds like he is trying to lose weight and the lack in fat is messing with his hormonal balance.
/r/askTRP20/03/20 04:03 AM
2

Masculinity isn't something you reclaim, it's something you constantly chase trying to improve upon with every workout and interaction. It's a constant work in progress, everyday of the week. "The goal is the journey not the destination."
/r/askTRP19/03/20 10:17 PM
1

Weightlifting is the most fun overall, while Martial arts cardio training is the most fun regarding cardio and feels the most rewarding afterwards overall. Why? Lifting weights and hitting things is always interesting and gives a certain feeling of non-cheap instant gratification. Swimming is fun enough, but running is the most boring thing for me. I need headphones with an interesing podcast or else I will die of boredom while running. Overall best cardio solution is having your own training bi…
/r/askTRP19/03/20 09:23 PM
0

This isn't working for OP, the girlfriend simply seems uninterested based on the flawed assumption of timeless beauty. Inviting her to participate in gym training or home gym training isn't going to fly, dread is the way to go.
/r/askTRP19/03/20 08:55 PM
11

Different viewpoints: Men_Group1 dislikes Simps. Simping puts a false sense of entitlement into women, which isn't helpful or healthy for neither men nor women. Men_Group2 is neutral towards Simping, engages in it as long as it's alleged to be low risk and high reward situation. Men_Goup3 is desperate for sex, attention and validation. Trying it all. Men_Group1 will fingerpoint to Men_Group2 and call out their gambling based on over-estimating rewards and underestimating risks (short-term reward…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/20 05:25 PM
2

"I have to wonder, is this some manospherean meme or do men genuinely, with all of their hearts believe that not getting sex easily is a plight worth feeling bad for (and subsequently doing something about)?" The polar opposite. Manosphere/Red Pill is holding the following core believes: 1. You are not entitled to anything, she isn't entitled to anything. 2. Getting women is a byproduct of your self-improvement/value, you are dating on your terms. The whole manosphere narrative is about taking p…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/20 01:56 PM
1

More likely than not she will try to establish something long-term to secure her your resources. It harms, if you fall for her upcoming antics. It will help you, if you act smart enough.
/r/askTRP18/03/20 06:19 PM
1

I am also commenting on your newest comment you already deleted: "The guy's name doesn't change that argument." You don't have an argument! You wanted to proof influential Red Piller are former Incels. You talked nonsense about Rollo. I had to correct you. Instead of apologizing for spreading misinformation you changed the focus from Rollo to the "Confessions of a Reformed Incel". I had to explain you, that it's from a former Incel who turned Blue Pill again and furthermore I explained why it's …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 07:57 AM
1

"You're arguing some moronic semantic point". I have explained the difference between learning RP truth and living the lifestyle, because you used those two interchangeable. Remind yourself of the fact, that you didn't even knew the difference between Rollo and some random blogger. You simply aren't as accurate as you think you are with neither your language nor your facts. Stop deflecting, try reflecting. "It sounds like most had below-average pasts and that's why they were so drawn to RP when …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/20 12:30 AM
1

"I'm talking about the "before" guys, what they were like before they joined RP and why they chose to turn to it." You are confused. Again: If they are learning about Red Pill truth without living Red Pill lifystyle, of course that does not constitute joining RP. They never joined, proven by not following the lifestyle. Remember your talking point: "The men who turn to TRP for help tend to be originally incels and thirsty betas and frustrated divorced guys, guys who have failed hard with women."…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 06:35 PM
1

Wrong. Turning to TRP is constituted by living the Red Pill lifestyle. Accepting Red Pill truth and act accordingly is being Red Pill. Getting to know some Red Pill truth getting lost in the Abyss based on the inability to cope is simply not Red Pill. Rollo a former incel? Why are you lying, my dude? Not only was he years into his marriage before he started writting Red Pill posts and literature, his talking point is "No man is actually an Incel. If you've got $100 you can get laid". He is rejec…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 11:55 AM
0

Please remind yourself, that Incels are blue pill beta thirsty men that put women on the pedestal and have nothing to do with TRP. TRP is about accepting obervable reality and self-improvement, getting women as a byproduct. That's the absolute polar opposite of the false sense of entitlement of the self-defeating Incel mindset.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/20 08:22 AM
3

Like "my last BF was abusive". I think a lot of women "claim" that, but precisely how much does this really happen? My girlfriend's extended family called her cousin out on this. The cousin is still claiming her ex was abusive. No, he was not. She acted unbelievable entitled and disrespectful all the time everytime and only sometimes he engaged in half-arsed attempts at taking her accountable for her actions...and he failed! She used the "my boyfriend is abusive, be my hero please" card to seek …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/20 06:51 PM
1

You are reframing...again. Wanting your boyfriend to be not only ok but even turned on by the thought of you getting it from someone else is indeed a kink. Withhold information to reframe the narrative as "wanting pleasure from a beautiful man isn't a kink" is simply an dishonest disregard for basic definitions. That's why I said: Even if a cuck is interested in you, he will be put off by you being too insecure to accept your kink as what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/20 05:37 AM
1

your mental gymnastics and head canons of pretending your kinks and fetishes aren't kinks and fetishes is a red flag Already explained.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/20 08:11 AM
1

Doesn't matter what kind of standards are being followed, it's about using the standard as an excuse to use head canon definitions.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 11:53 PM
2

So you are aiming at getting an unattractive provider with erectile dysfuction to show him your cuck fetish footage?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 11:32 PM
1

"The fact that I want to sleep with only attractive men." Doesn't matter. "I'm really sorry to break this to you but women get turned on by beauty." Doesn't matter. " The exact same way men do." No. Most men AND women don't expect women OR women to commit to non-exclusive relationships. "Turned on by beauty" is an excuse, that simply isn't used. Don't try to pretend it is. "I would prefer to have a man who wanted me to be in pleasure & have orgasms." So you want a man to commit to a non-exclusiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 11:21 PM
1

You can understand why mental gymnstics like rewritting of definitions isn't flying with men, yes?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 10:57 PM
0

Not simping out to Insta Thots should be easy, but the implications are even more unsettling. He was betraying his own words. Can you trust in anything he is saying anymore? You will have to find out yourself. It's at least a red black.
/r/RedPillWomen27/02/20 06:16 PM
1

I agree. A man of value is a man of his word. He will do what he has promised/announced/threatened to do, his actions must follow his words. Everything else is paying lip service. Simply untrustworthy behaviour. The realistic bad take of the situation: OP "expressed to him very clearly since day one that (she) wasn’t comfortable with his checking out other girls pics" and he agreed to it, knowing he can get away with it. And he would have, if not for the "like". It isn't helping, that he is givi…
/r/RedPillWomen27/02/20 05:35 PM
1

"I sent a screenshot to him and he claimed he didn’t even remember liking it and that he really liked it for the lighting." "I remember I liked the ass in thong pic, due to the lighting...without remembering liking it." The issue isn't that he is liking (upvoting) the pic, it's about him looking at those pics in the first place, although you two have established boundaries regarding E-Thots. That's why it's his first time offense, normally he isn't upvoting pics like this, only looking at them. …
/r/RedPillWomen27/02/20 05:19 PM
3

It's not about being a man or woman, it's about logical reasoning. "Additionally, while looks do matter, in order to get a man to commit to you, you need to act like a high value woman so that he will cherish you. The tips we share here on how to act like a high value woman work; the overarching principles will get a man to treat you like you are the love of his life." FDS women are low value women who can only act and thereby fake being high value to attract low value beta provider. "straight m…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 03:59 PM
1

"I said if no-one is gonna take the first step there won't be a relationship." Cool story. But both men and women do indeed take the first step, therefore your fictional scenario isn't worth talking about. I simply don't care about your off topic made up scenario in which both men and women magically stop stepping up. "This red pill revolution talk isn't an argument. Because you have none." Yes, I made no argument regarding your fictional scenario in which magically no one is stepping up. It was…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 03:05 PM
2

Still wrong. FDS indeed prioritizes what they want ("Just because we care about a man's generosity and see it as one of the many measures one can have in determining a man's seriousness about you, doesn't mean that it's the only thing we care about.") over what men want and openly advocating for manipulation ("Additionally, while looks do matter, in order to get a man to commit to you, you need to act like a high value woman so that he will cherish you. The tips we share here on how to act like …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 02:36 PM
2

Wrong. Women chase high value men all the time. You can try to dismiss women as doormats who actively go for high value men, but your narrative is coming from a low value woman, who wants low value men simping and orbiting around her. FDS women simply can't get with high value men and hate all women who try and can. You are right, FDS can't end up with me. I won't allow it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 01:55 PM
0

Nope, not the same logic. FDS: "Let men invest in you. Period." Red pill: "You simply don't need to invest first. Women will come and seek out the attention of high value men anyway and as soon as she invested in you, you can invest in her aswell."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 01:40 PM
0

Women will take the first step. FDS isn't working. Only simps are falling for their demands and FDS woman simply can not respect them. Men are stopping to participate in the simp culture? Women will try and get male attention by earning it. Your point is, that if FDS women are not stepping up and men aren't stepping up that "there won't be a long term or a short term", but you forget non-FDS women and that FDS women will indeed seek out men as soon as it isn't working out for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 01:38 PM
2

She will appreciate you after having done the work to get to you. Giving your commitment or even your attention away maybe makes her happy for a moment, but it neither does help you at all nor her long-term.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 01:06 PM
8

FDS are simply hating on men, who value their time and money. Remember: Women following FDS have nothing to offer, but demand everything. "Me personally: i pay for everything for my pump and dumps, I expect an LTR to help pay for dates. And if she won't, she's a pump and dump." Never invest in a woman before she invests in you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 11:28 AM
13

"It's not a problem and don't confuse this for incel content because I'm basically trying to point a difference in culture." You got it wrong. Incels are acting like blue pilled beta thirsty simps and most definitely would buy girls drinks to get a chance to interact with them, even when they know it will get them nowhere in the end. Dating culture in the USA is simp culture and Incels love to take part of it. "A first date feels like an interview, there's this transactional element when a guy b…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/20 09:49 AM
11

...and failed.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/02/20 03:58 PM
182

The brother on the bottom left is the actor Yahya Abdul-Mateen II. He is ‎6'3'' and got in really good shape for his role as Black Manta. Famous with a net worth of at least 2m dollar. Tall, muscular, athletic (hurdler during his Berkeley days), famous, rich, Bachelor of architecture from Berkeley + Master of fine arts degree frome the Yale school of drama, never married, no kids, got a lead role in the upcoming Matrix 4 movie... It's never enough for them...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/02/20 12:36 PM
43

The brother on the bottom left is the actor Yahya Abdul-Mateen II. He is ‎6'3'' and got in really good shape for his role as Black Manta. Famous with a net worth of at least 2m dollar. Tall, muscular, athletic (hurdler during his Berkeley days), famous, rich, Bachelor of architecture from Berkeley + Master of fine arts degree frome the Yale school of drama, never married, no kids, got a lead role in the upcoming Matrix 4 movie... It's never enough for them...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/02/20 12:32 PM
1

Blue pill thirsty people like Incels and others that are putting women on a pedastal/disregarding observable reality are the one acting shocked and devastated, all while having a moan about it. Blackpillers accept observable reality reluctantly, but of course also have a moan about it. Redpill is all about accepting observable reality AND act accordingly. Redpilled dudes acting shocked and devastated regarding issues, that per definition must be accepted and act on accordingly for them to be con…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/20 08:16 AM
23

The statement is utter garbage. "What does a person really gain for falsely accusing someone of harassment or assault?"Different things, depends on the case. We had situations of a girl having a threesome with two dudes, people saw her going with them, she claimed the two raped her out of fear this would kill her chances of getting with the guy she actually liked. No joke, this was her reasoning after being found out making the false claims. At least one of the dudes lost his football college st…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 10:09 AM
3

I don't consider the phrase harmful. Hypergamie is observable reality, moving past the phrase is denying reality. The phrase is carrying pragmatic truth, it reminds both men and women, that either will stop the relationship should the other step out of line. No man of value will stick with a unfeminine woman and women will get with the best man possible, therefore the man has to secure the relationship by keeping his stuff together to make him her best possibility. It simply is the most realisti…
/r/RedPillWomen15/02/20 02:04 PM
4

"In addition he told me that he had a conversation with her to see if there could be anything between them. She admitted to seeing a future with him but doesn't want anything right now because she's not looking for anything serious and he is. He tells me that he doesn't see a future with her. He said that he's not uncomfortable with how their friendship is and that he will do what he thinks is best." Ok, he gave the situation away right there: He is waiting for her to be available for a romantic…
/r/RedPillWomen15/02/20 03:48 AM
1

Most important rule: She has to make herself worthy of your attention and commitment. If you make her earn it, she is more appreciative as soon as she receives attention and commitment. Shower her with attention before she earned it and she will underappreciate you. That's the most solid screening process you can run to avoid red flags. Also continue to run game on her during a long-term relationship. Never marry. Marriage is a contract you are signing with the government, stating that you pay f…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/20 04:17 PM
1

Not really. Women are developing feelings earlier on, but men are developing strong feelings after they have put time and money into the relationship. Nevertheless women are acting out, even if they don't like you yet, should you give other women your attention. Attention is like a drug and the most valuable currency.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/20 08:42 AM
5

Let's not forget, that bad experiences made her damaged beyond repair, proven by her insane delusional and unreasonable list of demands not even a hot young virgin can get away with easily.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/01/20 03:48 AM
1

HR was the easy way out. Calling the non-friend out was to reestablish respect and self-respect. "The move you suggested would overtly communicate that she feels threatened by the other's presence and that they have some kind of power over her." Because they have. OP knows it. Non-friend knows it. Colleagues know it. Pretending that non-friend would not have power over her is the most typical passive "blanket over the head" approach and will never work out. It has been established via OP being n…
/r/RedPillWomen20/01/20 05:21 PM
1

Disingenuous take on the situation. FDS is engaging in passive aggressive drama aswell. RP is also about recognizing one's worth and acting accordingly, means standing up for one's interest and drawing a line in the sand, if necessary. In this case it's all about calling her out directly, the polar opposite of beforementioned passive aggressive highschool cliche. Playing the doormat and thereby denying your selfworth is the most non-RPW behaviour you can engage in.
/r/RedPillWomen20/01/20 04:18 PM
0

Victim blaming and blame shifting routine. One remark as a reaction doesn't constitute more "workplace bullying, in a much more literal sense" than month-long ongoing workplace bullying by a person, who is involving/recruiting other co-workers to join in. Blaming any victim for standing up for himself/herself seems like an unhelpful and disingenuous take on the situation.
/r/RedPillWomen20/01/20 04:05 PM
-3

Of course it's productive to reestablish respect and dominance in the eyes of her peers. Right now she is a disrespected doormat. What's unproductive? Trying to reestablish a friendship with a person, that was never a friend in the first place, only a work colleague. Thinking that calling her straight out "arguably is stooping below her level" shows that you think the aggressor shittalking someone behind his/her back AND make passive aggressive snarky remarks to his/her face is somehow not as ba…
/r/RedPillWomen20/01/20 03:55 PM
-13

She isn't your friend, she is your work colleague. Not a friendly one. Play her game. Either go straight to HR and snitch on her for workplace bullying or call her out. "Wow, you are in a mood. Romantic rejection must hit you hard...I am so so so sorry. I know it's hard for a senior citizen to find someone new..."
/r/RedPillWomen20/01/20 12:29 PM
3

2.5. Royal protocol is annoying. You either stomach it or you want to leave. Harry as a known rebel never liked all those obligatory codes, royal etiquette in the first place. The italian or spanish looking non-black Meghan is a complete narcissist who's using Harry's wish to downsize his royel obligations to alienating him away from his family completely. She has quarrels with pretty much everyone (Royals, servants, reporters), is known for self centered, unfriendly behaviour besides ignoring r…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/20 08:16 PM
3

Self improvement is something you achieve for yourself. Not engaging in self improvement just because the relationship can end up not working out anyway? Bad decision. You need self improvement for yourself, wether it's helping you in this current relationship or later in any other relationship. The current situation? He is showing interest in marriage and shows patience, all while playing your emotional support animal and hoping for improvement on your part. Either try to improve or lose him in…
/r/RedPillWomen18/01/20 09:27 PM
3

Not talking about the endgame isn't taking advantage. Being open and honest aren't even mutual exclusive. One person can refuse to disclose information about intentions even after being asked and still be honest, because he is fullfilling what is agreed upon. Again, the other person isn't entitled to know the intentions. Unsure if you like the known or unknown intentions? Simply take personal responsibility and don't consent. As soon as you have, you can't change your mind later and have a moan …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 03:45 AM
2

"Expectations are a part of how society functions." Expectations of what was agreed upon, not the unspoken expectations of an favoured outcome. "Normal, non-psychopathic people recognize that it is wrong to withhold information to take advantage of others." Yes, but luckily we aren't talking about a case in which someone is taking advantage of someone, but two people are freewillingly consenting. No one is consenting to an specific outcome, this isn't even an topic at hand in the scenario we are…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 03:23 AM
2

Withholding information the other wasn't asking for and isn't entitled to know in the first place is bad? Again: Neither the man nor the woman is entitled to know the endgame. The only important aspect is that both are freewillingly engaging in consensual sexual relations in that point in time. Both are getting exactly what they were signing up for, that's the definition of fair game. Your whole talking point is based on the presumption, that the girl would only engage in consensual sexual relat…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 01:07 AM
3

Is it in his best interest? Depends on him. They fuck with him, because they can. They will never respect him until he is standing up for himself. He doesn't have to get in someone's face, but he has to establish himself. If he is lacking self-worth and isn't motivated or ambitious enough to change his status in his peer group, he shouldn't try to change the dynamic half-arsed.
/r/RedPillWomen17/01/20 12:21 AM
2

It makes him suffering from a false sense of entitlement, just like the girl in your fictitious scenario. She is ghosting him...so what? He isn't entitled to be considered interesting, just like the girl in your fictitious scenario isn't entitled to anything. Trying to prevent hurt feelings of egocentric induviduals? Ok, where do you want to draw the line? Never criticise a drama mongering narcissist, because it can hurt feelings?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 12:02 AM
2

She simply isn't entitled to have the guy interested after a casual hook up, just like a guy isn't entitled to be considered interesting after a hook up. What's with the false sense of entitlement? Confusion and pain based on her inability to read the situation after neither made promise regarding future relations? That's on the person, who is suffering from false sense of entitlement, not on the person that didn't even discuss future relations.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 11:49 PM
9

Your problem isn't about his co-workers talking shit about you, you don't really care what unknown faces say, it's about the fact that they talk shit about you TO HIM! This shows you, that he isn't respected or feared by his peers. This lack of respect is concerning you, because it shows his social status isn't as high as you thought. By telling him "I love and respect you as a man above all else" you were trying to reassure yourself, that you are respecting and loving him as much as ever. " Wha…
/r/RedPillWomen16/01/20 09:45 PM
2

All these "Redpillers don't always bang 9-10/10" arguments are silly. No shit, those girls are rare and most of the time never around and if present they are instantly brigaded by many men, that you will consider trying a bad investment of time. After scoring a 9, you will see that they aren't even good in bed. They know they are attractive and receive a lot of attention, so that they don't have any incentive to put in any work. Women scoring a 6 or 7 are also getting attention disproportionatel…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/20 08:29 PM
4

That's simply exposing their mindset. She is justifying being with a guy under 6'1'' or up to 6'3''...to herself! Actually she is unironically thinking she would be deserving of a man as tall. Remember: If she is banging on about the height issue, she will exchange you for a taller man as soon as she can.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/20 02:53 PM
4

Unfortunately she wasn't a midget, just short. I would've loved that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/20 11:29 AM
9

Everything absolute correct. I am 6'1'' and was with a 5'10'' woman, who was banging on about finally having a man that was taller than her. She said something about prefering my height once a week. Her ex was 5'7''. Another woman was 4'9'' and banging on about me being the first guy under 6'4'' she has ever dated. The tall woman prefered the taller man (me), although at least she had a years long relationship with a short dude at one point. For the ultra short woman it's something new to date o…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/20 05:26 AM
1

I think you are underestimating women's confusion about the different types of attention. The realistic situation: 1. Women have sex. 2. Women confuse sexual attention (Instant sexual gratification is helluva drug) with relationship attention. "We just totally clicked, it was magic." 3. They continue to have sex with the man, thinking the magical sexual moments are a substitute for showcasing relationship material worthy traits. 4. The man is moving on at some point, the woman is sad. She though…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/20 02:01 AM
1

You got that wrong. Men of value are shit testing. They are trying to get into the pants, but for a woman to be worthy of further consideration she shouldn't give in and prove self control and that she isn't promiscuous. There is no balance. It's mutual exclusive. Either she is earning further consideration during the first dates or the probability is zero. How to earn further consideration? Display valuable abilities and a reasonable mindset for a relationship and spark interest of the man. If …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/20 05:00 PM
1

He could be honest with you, but in his mind this is leading to constant fighting again. He is associating the whole topic with fighting and your reaction of "I started being jealous and overly defensive that I knew I was staring to treat him bad". Was he keeping it from you? "I kind of accused him of it and he didn’t even deny." It was a non-issue for him, the opposite of a secret. "My concern is that how do I stop feeling insecure towards the girl?" Never. He was the one who was asking to try …
/r/RedPillWomen13/01/20 06:03 AM
2

That's the point. He doesn't have to tell you. I didn't assume anything. You told yourself that you were bringing up the topic over and over again and that was leading to constant fighting, which resulted in him throwing in the towel. That's called nagging and is the reason why he isn't talking about the topic at hand. But let's investigate: You were communicating with him rationally and he saw this as constant fighting and broke it off? Either the communication wasn't as rational and drama free…
/r/RedPillWomen13/01/20 05:35 AM
2

That is not the point. The relationship contract is establishing what is constituting cheating. For example: Two people could agree upon a relationship contract, that is stating only sex is cheating. They could agree upon, that they are poly and only engaging in sexual contact with people on a blacklist is considered cheating. They could agree upon, that flirting is already cheating. Three different relationship contracts with different agreements regarding cheating. If OP is agreeing to it, it'…
/r/RedPillWomen13/01/20 03:20 AM
0

" I wouldn’t mind if they still become friends, the issue is that my partner is somehow not telling me how close they have become since we broke up and agreed to try again. " You are not in a relationship. You do not have a relationship contract established, that would contractually request him to tell you anything. Let's be realistic: He is telling you, that she has become his best buddy. Your response? Nagging and/or being passive agressive, so that he is losing respect and interest in you eve…
/r/RedPillWomen13/01/20 02:57 AM
3

I will try to show you the male perspective regarding marriage and divorce: The woman is leaving the man for good reasons. The man is paying. The woman is leaving the man after she cheated. The man is paying. The man is leaving the woman after she cheated. The man is paying. The man is leaving without any good reason. The man is paying. Marriage is high risk for any man and that's why more and more men are in principal opposition to marriage. How to get a man that isn't in pricipal opposition to…
/r/RedPillWomen13/01/20 02:28 AM
1

I can give a male perspective: GF and I wearing mostly comfy and pragmatic clothing at home, but she is changing into the nice lingerie whenever she is expecting me to make a move or is initiating herself. She loves being feminine, feeling sexy and I appreciate her efforts and work. Unwrapping her is part of the fun for us. Maybe being nude all the time is indeed normalizing something, that should be exciting and special.
/r/RedPillWomen13/01/20 01:38 AM
2

Let's do the math: 1 kilo of fat is worth 7000kcal. Let's say you can reach a caloric deficit of 700kcal per day. That's a fat weight loss of 1 kilo (2,2 lbs) every 10 days. Imagine having a cheat day every Monday. Instead of an deficit of 700kcal, you eat a surplus of 1400kcal. Total of 2100kcal wasted. One cheat day is cheating you out of 3 days! You do NOT need a cheat day. You want a cheat day, you are convincing yourself you would need a cheat day. You don't need a cheat day. Count calories…
/r/RedPillWomen13/01/20 01:17 AM
2

You should highly care about your sex life. Long-term sexual compatibility is something you can learn and earn: Both man and woman staying in shape is significant. Health is the most important aspect. Feeling bodily unwell and/or hating the own body and/or hating SO's body can be prevented or at least reduced just by healthy lifestyle choices. The biggest minefield I can witness are addiction problems. Alcohol, pills, weed can kill sexual desire. The other big field of problems is lacking intima…
/r/RedPillWomen13/01/20 12:16 AM
1

The so called relationship contract is setting expectations and boundaries. A man of value will treat the negotiated relationship contract like any other business contract. You said in a comment "We are in a monogamous , committed relationship" and based on that I will assume you have defined what is constituting cheating: Your SO is basically announcing, that he is willing to break your relationship contract, while he is expecting you to hold your end of the bargain. This is showing a lack of v…
/r/RedPillWomen12/01/20 11:35 PM
1

Pretty much every relationship horror story in the subreddits JUSTNOSO or JUSTNOMIL or BREAKINGMOM are based on a spineless blue pilled man, that isn't standing up for his wife against his mother/family or he is simply not fulfilling his wife's expactation. Yes, the same wife that had picked him in the first place based on his ability to play a doormat to her is having a cry about him not having a spine/ambition when it would benefit her. Degrading and emasculating the own husband and thinking t…
/r/RedPillWomen12/01/20 08:22 PM
2

Here is the thing: You are "withholding" sex at the beginning, so that the man can see, that you have self control and aren't promiscuous. Even if he is trying, don't engage in sex during the first dates at least. Men of value will test you and if you want a meaningful long-term relationship with said man, don't fail this test. That's the whole deal. Do NOT try to use sex as a tool to control a man. A man of value will laugh at this attempt and just switch you out for a non drama mongering femal…
/r/RedPillWomen12/01/20 08:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter