| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | It goes for everyone no matter what!If they're literally unarmed, how would you convince a jury they picked up the plant? I'd bet that a jury in Kentucky would believe it if some god-fearing police officer swore under oath. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 02/12/20 03:54 PM |
| 1 | Shutting her shit down.You must be an exhausting person to deal with every day. A feel bad for your parents | /r/PussyPassDenied | 11/06/17 09:22 PM |
| 1 | Shutting her shit down./r/summerreddit | /r/PussyPassDenied | 11/06/17 04:08 PM |
| 3 | Shutting her shit down.Attacking someone for being a single mother, which is entirely unrelated to anything that could possibly have to do with their business with you, is not "defending yourself". That's going on the attack | /r/PussyPassDenied | 06/06/17 12:20 PM |
| 1 | Shutting her shit down.Thanks for the advice, high school freshman. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 06/06/17 09:38 AM |
| 8 | Shutting her shit down.People love this karma/justice porn stuff more then professionalism these days. All I'm saying is that no one has ever stopped going to a place because, "they displayed too much professionalism and decorum in the face of adversity". But the same cannot be said of making public and personal attacks against your own customers | /r/PussyPassDenied | 06/06/17 01:17 AM |
| 638 | Shutting her shit down.why should the business owner have any restraint? Because making public personal attacks against your customers tends to be bad for business even if you feel it was justified | /r/PussyPassDenied | 06/06/17 12:48 AM |
| 1 | "Privilege"This is the literal definition of cherry picking data. | /r/MensRights | 10/05/17 01:14 AM |
| 1 | Equality in a nutshell [Facebook bullshit]basically No Ma'am from Married With Children. Holy shit this is insanely accurate. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/17 05:28 PM |
| 1 | How to get banned from r/FeminismOP says that you have the right to be safe from physical harm being inflicted upon you, and you should address this when it's infringed upon. However, the tone suggests that OP is conflating actually being harmed with safety from harm. This implies that your safety from physical harm is only infringed upon when someone actually physically harms you. When, in actuallity, a situation can arise where you are not safe from physical harm, regardless of whether or not you are actually harmed. And this… | /r/MensRights | 18/12/16 11:27 PM |
| -2 | 50/50Or are you saying that some people don't understand advanced humor due to limited intellectual capacities? Holy shit you're not joking. It is genuinely sad that you are like this. I feel bad for you. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/16 05:01 PM |
| 1 | 50/50Kasin point: This exact same image has been shared on this website and has gotten thousands of upvotes multiple times now. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/16 04:58 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter