| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Category system for instances of discriminationYour question made me wonder if we're talking about the same thing. So lets do a quick recap of said concept together. Liberty - The state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one's way of life, behaviour, or political views. So oppressive restrictions imposed by the US government during segregation directly violated the very concept liberty. Now instead of being sassy can you answer my question: What was segregation if not discrimination in form of l… | /r/MensRights | 29/07/18 05:02 AM |
| 2 | Category system for instances of discriminationMoot point. Moot point? What was segregation if not discrimination in form of law? | /r/MensRights | 29/07/18 04:23 AM |
| 3 | Category system for instances of discriminationCould you please elaborate, which terms do you find contradicting? Because discrimination can be law. To help you out: Discrimination - the unjust or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people, especially on the grounds of race, age, or sex. Law - the system of rules which a particular country or community recognizes as regulating the actions of its members and which it may enforce by the imposition of penalties. | /r/MensRights | 29/07/18 01:22 AM |
| 3 | Category system for instances of discriminationSo you do agree that discrimination is a real thing at least when it's a law? What about when similar things continued happening after Brown v Board of Education? It wasn't a law anymore, just majority of white Americans were incredibly racist. Was that discrimination or liberty? Was the Civil Rights Act was irrelevant? | /r/MensRights | 28/07/18 01:37 PM |
| 5 | Category system for instances of discriminationIf a business is making choices you disagree with, you simply stop your patronage of said business. This is what is known as "liberty". So when US businesses in early 1900 were making choice to not allow black people in. Was that liberty? "discrimination" is irrelevant and shouldn't be considered So everything that was happening under Jim Crow laws was irrelevant and shouldn't have been considered? And the Civil Rights Act that prohibits all forms of discrimination is also irrelevant and shouldn… | /r/MensRights | 28/07/18 04:41 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter