TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Prohibitoid Archive

View 0 posts and 13 comments by Prohibitoid on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

"Dogmatic?" Say what?
/r/MensRights16/10/12 05:15 AM
5

Speaking as Left-of-Left, politically, I have to say that no, confused people might get mad, but it's not a "Liberal" idea. Wikipedia can offer more info on what I mean. Is he an African immigrant? No? Then he is not an immigrant-hypen-American, which I disdain anyway, as a way to emphasize their Otherness. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 04:03 AM
1

Maybe Satanists & child molesters! LOL?
/r/MensRights18/03/12 09:56 PM
1

Venting is very different than trolling. Asking for evidence and never receiving any is not "being smug" or whatever. I do agree that it should not be a default subreddit, if only because atheists are such a minority in many places.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 07:05 PM
7

They're offended because they fail to see /r/atheism as a support group, and do not understand what it's like to be one of the most hated minority groups in the world. You think people hate gays? Hah, opinion polls consistently rate them as TWICE as trust-worthy as us atheists, when all we do is insist on evidence for claims. The nerve of us! :P
/r/MensRights17/03/12 07:03 PM
9

I really don't understand this, and it really scares me. This is incredibly sexist, a holdover from decades old ideas long since discarded, or so I used to believe. Good luck, my friend.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 01:26 AM
1

No one here is in favor of any of that, and it's grossly offensive. Yes, in my opinion. You are a troll because someone might see that and think it's a legitimate opinion, which it is not.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 05:55 AM
2

Also, if it were fake, it would be merely a misunderstanding, one more internet lulz, with which you've proved nothing. I've been fooled before, and so have you, it's no big deal.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 05:30 AM
2

Fear, you got it, my friend.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 05:30 AM
1

The topic of the post is about feminists trying to co-opt OWS, I am clearly saying that anyone who supports the movement or, lacking that, anyone who opposes egregious bank behavior should watch out for people co-opting the movement. I mentioned this subreddit because I see a few comments giving credit to these attempts to co-opt its message. A movement about banks cannot become feminist, if only because the arguments couldn't make any sense. Is the bank leadership generally old white men? Maybe…
/r/MensRights26/11/11 08:31 PM
4

All I will say is that OWS has nothing to do with feminism or anything else of that kind. Please disregard the multitude of groups trying to co-opt what is actually a simple message. This subreddit is just as guilty in confusing the omnipresent co-opt fools for the actual movement of OWS. Just ignore them, folks.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 05:54 AM
8

The movement is not sexist or racist, some people trying to co-opt perhaps are. Banks are neither black nor men (etc, obviously), it's senseless.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 05:54 AM
1

People seem to rush to forget about 2008--it wasn't that long ago!
/r/MensRights06/11/11 12:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter