TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ProjectDirectory Archive

View 1 post and 97 comments by ProjectDirectory on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
20

ProjectDirectory/r/Divorce_Men13/04/23 02:51 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Failing that, I'm sure you have all her information; apply for a credit card under her name and charge exactly $3000. ;) Don't do this, this is fraud.
/r/Divorce_Men11/07/23 10:14 PM
1

Well then I'm a unicorn. 🦄 Because I had the final decree signed and submitted to the court on the first day I was legally able (Jun 12th) and the judge signed it today.
/r/Divorce_Men14/06/23 08:03 PM
1

Thanks, that's what I wanted to hear. Someone telling me it's all my fault. Go fuck yourself.
/r/Divorce_Men17/04/23 08:29 PM
1

She can absolutely ask me to move out of the house she owned when we met. I didn't have to move out immediately, but I had a place to go and I wasn't going to stick around and be treated like shit. I'd argue that the majority of the problems she has with me has been because of her lack of respecting my boundaries.
/r/Divorce_Men14/04/23 10:51 PM
1

I'm certain it will go smoothly, she doesn't want to have to sell her house.
/r/Divorce_Men13/04/23 09:19 PM
3

I know where I messed up. I didn't walk when she basically said "fuck your feelings, I've got cancer" I knew it was a mistake as I made it.
/r/Divorce_Men13/04/23 02:25 PM
2

Her debt is piles and piles of credit card debt from Amazon shopping sprees for herself, and gifts for friends, and family. Frankly, I don't want the court saddling me with HER debt. My debt is mostly repairs to the house, which would certainly be split. She owned the home she loves before we met, I'm using the fact the court will likely rule her debt as belonging solely to her and my debt being community debt as leverage to walk away smoothly. Because the only way she can afford to pay is to se…
/r/Divorce_Men13/04/23 02:23 PM
4

Yeah, if not a narcissist certainly narcissistic in nature. Fortunately she now "wants to be friends" and since she owned the house before we married she can have it, and I'm not going to go after her for the credit card debt I ran up repairing her house. But if she plays hardball, then I'll go after her for the credit card debt and she'll have to sell the house to cover her portion of it. I told her the only way we can still be friends is if we both make the divorce as painless as possible. No …
/r/Divorce_Men13/04/23 03:24 AM
3

The best thing to do is not spend your energy on any of this, just walk with the satisfaction of knowing that the smart home doesn't work anymore.
/r/Divorce_Men13/04/23 02:28 AM
1

This!
/r/Divorce_Men13/04/23 02:26 AM
3

Absurd! The worst you could be charged for face palming too hard would be reckless endangerment.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 05:39 PM
1

Not quite, they can't just stop you and request your drivers license. They require reasonable suspicion that you've committed a crime or witnessed you commit a traffic offense.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 12:58 AM
3

"The application of Tex.Penal Code Ann., Tit. 8, § 38.02 (1974), to detain appellant and require him to identify himself violated the Fourth Amendment because the officers lacked any reasonable suspicion to believe appellant was engaged or had engaged in criminal conduct. Accordingly, appellant may not be punished for refusing to identify himself, and the conviction is Reversed.” - Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 (1979) Being in a car in a public parking lot isn't illegal, and thus the officer wo…
/r/MensRights14/09/14 06:07 PM
2

This has not happened to me, but if it did I would refuse to show my identification. I live in the State of Texas, unless I've reasonable suspicion of committing a crime I do not have to show my drivers license. I would also refuse to give the officer my name, address or date of birth, since in the state of Texas a person only commits an offense if he intentionally refuses to give his name, residence address, or date of birth to a peace officer who has lawfully arrested the person and requested …
/r/MensRights14/09/14 04:47 PM
1

Chekov's Gun certainly applies, at least in the cases where the gun was used. But it doesn't apply in the cases where the gun wasn't used but the guy still ended up being guilty of SOMETHING. It's as if the presence of a gun even if not related to the crime, and clearly owned legally due to it being registered is somehow a symbol of evil intent. It was a formula, for sure. It was predictable only in the sense that if the suspect was either a woman or her husband then the husband was guilty. If t…
/r/MensRights12/09/14 09:56 PM
–

I stopped watching the Law & Order shows years ago after I noticed something. If a character owns a gun, even if the gun is owned legally and had nothing to do with the story one of two things will happen. He/She will be discovered to be the culprit or the gun will be used to commit a crime. Not to mention the man hater in the Law and Order :SVU. The only time I saw a suspect on that show that was a man, turn out not to be the culprit was when he was a black gay man who they had dead to rights w…
/r/MensRights12/09/14 05:05 PM
2

So using these numbers what percentage of rapes would have to go unreported to equal their 1 in 5 claim? (sorry, I can't math.)
/r/MensRights23/01/14 03:20 PM
9

I don't even find her all that unattractive, but I'm still stumped by the inclusion of her nakedness in the show. It's a comedy, so I guess her nude body is suppose to be funny?
/r/MensRights10/01/14 09:16 PM
1

I am hesitant to believe the word of a person that would, blackmail with threat of arrest, a person to self humiliate.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 07:10 PM
2

My initial impression after reading to headline was "You must be confused." but then I read the article and now I'm just speechless.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 04:28 PM
20

Killing is justified in protection of yourself or others.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 03:24 PM
1

Do you mean sarcasm?
/r/MensRights14/11/13 10:22 PM
-4

TIL that I an no one.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 05:31 PM
-5

If Obama is reelected President in 2016 I will support an armed insurrection to remove him from office. (because it is against the U.S. constitution for him to serve more than two terms) Edit: For the record I would have also supported an armed insurrection of GWB if he had stayed in office beyond 2008.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 05:52 AM
1

Fuck it, I'll leave it that way, good for the lulz.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 12:41 AM
12

THIS! You have probably already said something incrementing, don't talk to the police.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 04:24 PM
9

Actually the female chicken is called a "hen", while the male is called a "rooster" or a "cock". The joke was already gender neutral when it only referred to the chicken.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 02:45 AM
2

Eye witness testimony is the worse kind of evidence, in fact its so bad that you could make a case for not calling it evidence at all. However, people routinely believe that witness testimony is highly creditable.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 08:27 PM
1

I wouldn't really call this domestic violence, it more like unwarranted violence.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 03:14 AM
4

Upvote to you.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 05:28 PM
48

You're a terrible person. Edit: Your != You're.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 04:24 PM
1

I think rightsbot should always be the top post, so I upvote rightsbot, the original content of the message is always relevant.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 02:27 PM
9

If I say "I'm going to punch you in the fucking face."; Assault If I just punched you in the fucking face; Battery.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:41 AM
5

"I would like to see this place burning to the ground." is different than "Let's burn this place to the ground!"
/r/MensRights23/06/13 06:07 PM
2

If he is dead or in prison she gets it all.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 02:18 AM
0

"...consensual sex is an oxymoronic term; without consent, the act of sex isn't really sex at all." An oxymoron is a figure of speech that combines contradictory terms. How are "consensual" and "sex" contradictory? I think the writer of the article meant to say that consensual sex is a redundant term. And once again I stopped reading after the first sentence because it was already too stupid to continue. Edit: It appears that several other people have already noticed this. Upvotes to them.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 06:55 PM
4

The National Organization of Women (N.O.W.) was against a proposal in Michigan to allow 50/50 custody in uncontested divorces. Would that mean that N.O.W. is actively working against the rights of fathers? Yes.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 01:49 AM
1

Sorry, I meant to say that it has a failure rate of 27% if not done correctly everytime.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 06:22 PM
0

Withdrawl has a 4% failure rate if done absolutly correctly, and a 27% failure rate if done incorrectly every time. I think the main problem with this method as with all forms of birth control is inconsistent usage. It is just harder (no pun intended) to have consistent usage with a method like the withdrawl method.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 03:15 PM
9

I too have seen it before, and I think everyone should see this video at least once a year.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 07:45 PM
0

Evolution has created in the human male a warrior hunter well suited for a limited life span.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 11:46 PM
33

You see the school has a zero tolerance policy on firearms, and technically he was in possession of the firearm. (After forcefully removing it from the possession of the other student, which is technically theft of another student's property.) And technicalities are all that matter to the despots that run modern schools.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 03:24 PM
12

Most modern police work involves intimidation and harrassment until the suspect makes a mistake and says something incriminating. (regardless of true guilt or innocence) Don't talk to the police. Edit: fixed a mistake.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 11:35 PM
2

We talked about it a bit, we both found it to be off-putting. This was several years ago, perhaps things have changed there since.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 06:02 PM
5

You ask the patient, the patient has the right to privacy and that is the privacy that you are protecting when you limit persons from being present. My wife wasn't given a choice. I was declared Persona non grata by a person in a position of authority or by institutional rules based on my gender.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 06:00 PM
13

My wife and I went to planned parenthood when my wife tested pregnant via home pregnancy test. We went to Planned Parenthood to get a confirmation of pregnancy and nothing more. (not knowing at the time that home pregnancy test are very accurate if they report positive, you really only have to worry about a false negative with over the counter urine test.) I was not allowed to go back with her, as I was pretty much any other time she has seen a doctor in the past and since (general practitioner,…
/r/MensRights12/01/13 04:04 PM
10

When women don't report rape then it is assumed that they are being raped but aren't reporting it. When men don't report rape it is assumed that men aren't raped.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 02:09 AM
3

The comments there are insane, like this one: Damn, some people--male and female--are literally unable to tolerate >more than 30 seconds of not making men the center of everyone's sympathetic attention. Yes, folks, men get raped, and, VERY occasionally, the rapist is a woman, but you know what? Rape of >women by men is a HUGE public health problem! Rape of men by men is a somewhat smaller problem. Rape of men or women by women is a TINY problem. Women, for whatever reason, don't need to be told …
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:16 AM
107

Unilateral decisions such as buying a car without even consulting your spouse is a major red flag. If my wife bought a car without consulting me I would be furious.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 11:52 PM
1

This guy was a condition white in a public place. He was lucky.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 01:28 AM
2

I'll just leave this here. Don't walk around in the world at condition white.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 01:25 AM
1

Unless you were with him when the rape was suppose to have happened there is no way to know for certain if your friend "Ben" is a victim of a false rape allegation. You may reasonably beleive that he is innocent based on what you know of his character, and you should help him in any way you can. The best and first thing you should do is tell him "Do not speak to the police without a lawyer." Don't talk to the police.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 03:36 AM
2

Wait, didn't the prominent feminist organisation "N.O.W." actually campaign against a bill in Michigan which would have done exactly that?
/r/MensRights30/06/12 01:26 AM
2

While talking with a police officer, Rasbornik said her husband had attacked her, but she kept scratching and poking herself to make injuries more apparent. Even in an article about a woman faking abuse to get her husband arrested they suggest that the injuries weren't self inflicted, but rather just exaggerated. This sentence should have read: "While talking with a police officer, Rasbornik said her husband had attacked her, but she kept scratching and poking herself to create injuries."
/r/MensRights25/06/12 06:59 PM
6

Most of us understand that women collectively are evil or malevolent as a group/sex. I think you accidentally a word.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 11:32 PM
4

What about "made to penetrate"? If a man or a woman forces a man to penetrate, shouldn't that be considered rape of the person that was forced to penetrate? They seem to have left that out of your "better" definition.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 03:38 PM
20

If your walking around in public at condition white, then your doing something wrong. Being aware of your surroundings, everyone, everywhere, and everything is conditions yellow. Condition yellow is the proper mental condition to be in when in a public space. This website is targeted at people that carry a concealed firearm, but the situational awareness information should be used by EVERYONE. It's like defensive driving, your alert so that nothing surprises you. States of Awareness
/r/MensRights25/05/12 03:25 PM
-1

They should be on the front lines, put them there immediately. Edit: No idea why this was down voted.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 01:12 AM
2

Eye witnesses are notorious unreliable. Memory isn't absolute, like a photograph or video. It can be manipulated by time and emotion. In fact I've read research papers that suggest that every time you remember something the memory is altered.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 03:53 PM
10

Especially not for a cop.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 05:00 PM
2

It's generally better to completely ignore this nonsensical bullshit that you see on Facebook. Up-vote for being verbose, but you could have just stopped right there.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 03:59 PM
4

This is the premise of a book called "Not "Just Friends": Rebuilding Trust and Recovering Your Sanity After Infidelity", it's a book written by a woman by the name of Shirley Glass to help people recovering from infidelity. "Just Friends" is a trigger for people that are recovering from infidelity because many times the cheating party gas lights the faithful party into feeling guilty about their suspicions by saying "We're just friends.".
/r/MensRights19/05/12 12:00 AM
3

I went to a small town school, less than 150 students, k-12. The special ed teacher also taught classes for non-special ed students. She was a righteous bitch, domineering and controlling. I suspect that a certain personality type is drawn to that type of work.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 04:09 PM
20

I don't think he knows what these two words mean. "reverse" and "sexism"
/r/MensRights14/05/12 03:16 PM
3

At my work there are no females. We have two bathrooms, one is for standing and the other is for sitting.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 02:54 AM
3

I think most people would agree that if someone is incapacitated (and thus physically unable to give or deny consent) then sexual relations with that person would be rape, barring any prearranged consent. The argument here is that some people define being "incapacitated by intoxication" as ANY intoxication, or "any intoxication to the level that they don't remember if consent was given". However not remembering if consent was given does not inherently equal that consent was not given, and while …
/r/MensRights08/05/12 07:21 PM
3

It's been pretty well defined for drunk driving... Or has it? The lobbing efforts of M.A.D.D. seem to suggest so, but in reality it can be much different. Breathalyzers estimate BAC under a false assumption that the alcohol in the blood is directly related to the alcohol on the breath. Breathalyzers assume a standard ratio of 2100:1 between BAC and breath alcohol content. This ratio assumes that the man or woman being tested is an "average person" in terms of weight, health and other factors rel…
/r/MensRights08/05/12 06:56 PM
3

The arresting officer can get a "tip" and pull over the driver for "swerving" and then arrest him because he admitted to have been drinking, or he smelled of alcohol even if his breathalyzer results aren't over 0.08%. The swerve could be real or imagined or a complete fabrication and he can still get a DUI. M.A.D.D. has lobbied for years and has seriously screwed up the right to due process for people accused of drunk driving. These facts in addition to the other inappropriate behavior in these …
/r/MensRights25/04/12 08:18 PM
2

If she is claiming that he is the father and she knows he isn't then that would be criminal act and it would be up to the police to arrest her and the prosecutor to bring charges against her. He can't sue her until he can show that he has incurred a loss, and that that loss is the fault of the other party. If she claims he is the father, he will have to defend himself against those claims, this will cost money, even if he is ultimately found to not be the father due to the DNA test results. I be…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 05:41 AM
3

IANAL, but I play one on the internets. Unfortunately he can only really sue her for his actual losses, in this case those losses would almost certainly be exclusively the cost of defending himself against these claims. He might be able to get addition money for lost wages if he has to spend time away from work to deal with this.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 06:17 PM
24

I am a man and feel that if women don't want to get raped, they shouldn't wear provocative clothing. Oh wait, I don't think that and I don't know any man who does. "Rape Culture" is just a feminist invention to validate their bigotry against men. I am careful to not post inflammatory statements like this even as hyperbole, however I support your bravery in doing so.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 02:23 AM
1

I understand that you feel this to be the case, but I refuse to believe a generalization such as "...most men aren't aware of their harmful views of women..." However I would support the statement "Most men who have harmful views of women aren't aware their views are harmful." or "Some men have harmful views of women without being aware that their views are harmful." or even "Some men have harmful views of women."
/r/MensRights12/04/12 10:02 PM
2

The maturity level of people is a spectrum, this is certainly an example of the lower end of that spectrum, but ultimately it has no relevancy to what we are discussing here.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 08:19 PM
2

Broad generalizations are hurtful to healthy discourse, and your belief that most men aren't smart is misandry.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 08:10 PM
2

The erection of the penis isn't a voluntary process, it's a physiological process. Men can get erect or not get erect for various different reasons, some physical and some emotional. However the process is autonomous, it either becomes erect or it doesn't, regardless or desire or consent. (Believe me there wasn't anything sexy about 8th grade math, but that didn't stop my penis) To suggest that an erect penis equals consent would be analogous to me suggesting that a wet vagina equals consent, lu…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 07:50 PM
2

1.) Sexual excitement doesn't equal consent, sex without consent is rape. This should be the case if a women is the aggressor too. 2.)If a man is incapacitated, by a physical force or by other means any stimulation of the penis may result in an erection, this is proof of a physical response to stimuli and not proof of consent. 3.)Men aren't taught that women are nothing but objects of sexual desire, I am a man, and I wasn't taught this. Broad generalizations like this don't foster healthy discou…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 07:29 PM
79

It's wrong because it implies that only men can rape.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 04:37 AM
1

If my child is acting out in public, I'm going to tell her to be quite and stand next to the wall and not to ask me for anything, if she leaves the wall then she will be told that the punishment will be worse at home. This isn't abuse, this is discipline, it's something parents due to not raised spoiled selfish assholes.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 02:36 AM
2

According to maps.google.com, the street appears to be a one way street.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 09:30 PM
12

"any partner that is that obsessed with your whereabouts and information and is that paranoid could also be cheating on you. " My experience has show this to be true.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 04:27 PM
2

The only time such measures are necessary (for either spouse) is when rebuilding trust due to betrayal. And then, only when both parties agree that these are the steps necessary to rebuild that trust. Assuming you've done nothing wrong, since you didn't mention otherwise,you need to sit down and have a conversation with your wife about trust. Also I would suggest you look into your options for divorce.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 03:21 PM
1

I'm thinking I might buy spermicidal lube if such a thing exists. Such a thing exist, however don't use it as primary birth control, that's not what it is for. If you use spermicidal lubricant as your primary form of birth control then she WILL end up pregnant. Your best course of action is to break off all contact with her, immediately, she has already shown signs that she isn't reasonable, this situation will only get worse with time.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 03:58 PM
26

You definitively should not get a friend to lie for you, just the fact that you suggest that makes me worry this might be a troll.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 12:28 AM
4

I also respect your points, these are all valid issues. But from my experience, the internal dialogue can be more important than anything external. When my wife cheated on me, all of my friends told me it wasn't my fault and that I shouldn't feel like it were, but my internal dialogue was that it WAS my fault. It didn't matter that others were saying that it wasn't it only mattered what I was telling myself. And then my therapist asked me a question that would change my entire outlook on life. "…
/r/MensRights29/03/12 05:57 PM
18

(A tip to all young MRAs - find your primary affirmation from other men. Excessive emotional reliance on women greatly weakens your position.) I'll go one step further and extent this advice to all people. "Find your primary affirmation from yourself, excessive emotional reliance on others greatly weakens your position."
/r/MensRights29/03/12 04:54 PM
1

Depending on how affordable, affordable is, I'll be getting this done as soon as it's proven to be safe. Vasectomies are too expensive and permanent.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 03:36 PM
3

Wow, I thought I was the only one.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 05:27 AM
21

Sitting, reading, writing and talking, I like to do all of those things! Wow, who knew, all this time I thought I was a man, turns out I'm a woman.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 11:12 PM
1

I don't think of her as a whore at all, she made mistakes, demonized me to justify her actions and compromised her own principles, she allowed her emotions to control her behavior rather than her head.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 10:12 PM
8

When my wife cheated on me, she specifically told me it was my fault, and told all her friends it was my fault, I had to constantly answer questions from mutual friends (now ex-friends, turns out they were part of the problem) about what I may have done wrong. Fuck that, it wasn't my fault, I am no more in control of her actions than I am the rising of the tides or the setting of the sun.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 04:33 PM
3

I have worked in a profession that require collaboration for many years. When people are presented with a task they are familiar with then they are usually less prone to collaboration. So here is how I would replicate the results of this study. 1.)Test 1 : No Testosterone : The task is novel to the participants and thus they are more likely to collaborate. 2.)Test 2 : Testosterone : The task is no longer novel, all of the participants have completed the task previously. They are now less prone t…
/r/MensRights17/03/12 07:24 PM
2

"Men victimize, women are victims, and if your victimized by a women then your not really a man." This is the false logic used by society against men, and when my wife cheated on me and I cried about it, she abused me further by using this logic to demean me, telling me to "Act like a man.", and to continue to cheat on me. I am a man, and I have been then victim of emotional abuse.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 04:47 PM
1

These commercials highlight one of the roadblocks that men experience when attempting to perform domestic duties. "Women have a specific way of doing things, and if you do it differently, then your doing it wrong."
/r/MensRights08/03/12 08:45 PM
2

Based on what I've seen, it is in the realm of possibility that you could think your downloading one thing and get something else because the files says it's something that it's not. I've seen some questionable legal stuff (not CP) this way, noped the fuck out of there, deleted the file and did a multipass wipe in preparation for the police raid I was certain was going to be happening.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 04:59 PM
4

To think that something like this could happen in a so called "civilized" society is absurd.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 08:03 PM
6

The inevitable increase in death of women in combat will be used as proof of some sort of bias. Future Headline : "Death of Woman soldiers in Afghanistan have jumped by 800%"
/r/MensRights13/02/12 11:09 PM
5

"Some false rape apologists insist that women don't lie about rape. After all, why would women subject themselves to the ordeal of a rape trial? " The false rape apologist viewpoint if correctly stated here is a very naive viewpoint. For a real rape victim the trail and hopeful conviction of her attacker can be quite an ordeal. However for a false accuser the "ordeal" of a trail, isn't much of an ordeal at all. There is no emotionally draining fear that her rapist will go free, or that nobody wi…
/r/MensRights27/01/12 07:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter