TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ProjectVivify Archive

View 3 posts and 80 comments by ProjectVivify on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I think the implication is that the woman is using sex as a weapon to change male behaviour. Its different from a genuine 'I don't feel like having sex with you'. If someone's a bitch/asshole and you don't want to have sex with them, fine. If someone doesn't take out the garbage on time or want to spend time having lunch with your parents, you're a real dick to withdraw sex to correct their behaviour. The psy-op is disguising the second behaviour as the first so that when challenged she can clut…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/16 01:35 AM
1

Hey we only burnt 1000 copies of the book, its not like you can't print more. Whats the big deal anyway? Hey we only forced 1 printer to stop printing the book under threat of burning them down. It's not like they can't get it from another printer. The intent is clearly to stop people from purchasing the book. Not 'making it more difficult to purchase', but completely denying other free citizens from making a personal choice whether to read it or not. This should be stopped before it begins. Its…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 11:40 AM
2

In America, having sex with her would have been rape, since she legally couldn’t give her consent. This is commentary on the stupidity of certain consent laws in America where the woman being drunk = rape no matter what. In context she is going home with him and wants to sleep with him. Its like saying someone who smokes weed in Amsterdam is guilty of heinously violating drug laws because its a crime in (parts of) America. It doesn't matter that there's not a crime in the country where it happen…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 11:30 AM
4

Yeah, all groups in the manosphere have identified that the system is stacked against men in certain ways. They only differ in their solutions. Traditionally MRA's are concerned with fixing the system so its more fair, PUA's/RedPillers advocate self improvement and gaming the system and MGTOW's aim to remove themselves from the system to starve it of resources and protect themselves. The beefs that people in these groups have with each other is largely down to abrasive personalities. The system …
/r/MensRights15/01/16 05:14 AM
3

But her tits was my defense. Well.. we've all been there.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 02:19 PM
1

Thanks for this. This is pretty much the direction I've decided to head in.
/r/seduction27/09/15 03:04 AM
1

The old school PUAs used to diagnose an unwanted pairbond with a girl as 'oneitis'. The traditional solution to it was GFTOW, an acronym which roughly translates as 'get involved with enough other girls until you forget this one'
/r/seduction25/09/15 02:36 AM
7

So if I approached a girl the 2nd, 3rd, or 20th time we made eye contact she will just see me as a beta who just now got up the courage to talk to her, after looking at each other 20 times You're mindreading. You have no idea what she is thinking. She could be thinking 'Wow I really wish /u/Ta83848388 would come up and say hi, but I guess he doesn't like me. He's really hot, but I probably look like an awkward clutz.' You're also catastrophising, which is predicting the worst possible outcome. Y…
/r/seduction25/09/15 01:50 AM
1

I started doing this around a month ago when I decided to give up alcohol. Your self-esteem/inner game needs to be in a good place to the point that you can easily socialise with new people while sober. You can practice socialising at meetup events. You have a massive advantage in that your body language and conversational skills will be well ahead of most people in the bar. This advantage only gets bigger as the night wears on and you will stand out as 95% of guys get drunk. The only trick is t…
/r/seduction25/09/15 01:17 AM
1

Thanks for your comment. This makes a lot of sense. I'm a bit older so, I've got to take that into account when presenting myself. I'll find a way to make it work Kino should be the only constant in your playbook. Every girl is different, and varying your approach to suit the target is ideal, but virtually every sane woman will prefer the guy who knows how to be physical without being a creep. Early, congruent and non-awkward kino has always been my weak point. I'm still looking for a way to do …
/r/seduction24/09/15 05:15 AM
1

Trying to equate my displeasure at your word policing with a bad attitude is disingenuous. I have no issue with promiscuous women. I'm not attracted to women with a slutty vibe even if they're chaste.
/r/seduction23/09/15 02:16 PM
1

One thing describes intent, but I use slutty vibe to describe appearance and demeanour. You can have a girl who appears very demure who is also not looking for anything serious. I'm really sick of getting policed by people like you with a chip on their shoulder.
/r/seduction23/09/15 01:44 PM
1

I said slutty vibe and I don't look down on those girls, but I'm not attracted to them. If you know of an accurate less offensive adjective to substitute, let me know.
/r/seduction23/09/15 10:01 AM
2

Yeah, I think I'm moving too slowly and not being sexual enough. This would probably explain why the girls keep asking boyfriend probing questions. I present as an educated, well dressed, well mannered man with a good paying career. I don't kino or escalate before getting the #, but I do make good emotional connections. I think it might be a better idea to disqualify myself a bit more so I stop provider signalling. Also to do more escalation when I first meet them. Does this sound like a good pl…
/r/seduction23/09/15 09:00 AM
1

What about with women who I would only want a casual relationship with, such as single moms, women married to their careers etc? I don't want to have to disqualify women from casual relationships even though I would never have a committed relationship with them.
/r/seduction23/09/15 08:17 AM
1

How would you counter their frame of 'Do you want a family someday?' and similar questions?
/r/seduction23/09/15 08:09 AM
1

All men are rapists and that's all they are .. They rape us with their eyes, their laws and their codes. Prominant feminists such as Marilyn French have already made this claim. This shark was jumped a long time ago (at least as far back as 1978).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 07:16 AM
2

Sex and physical intimacy is vitally important for sustaining emotional bonds. Holding that hostage to get tasks done is manipulative and counterproductive if you want to have a healthy relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 07:26 AM
1

I think Roosh's launch of Neo-Maculinity is more to do with a desire to form a philosophy that isn't bound by previous ideologies. After discussion with some of his confidants he's come to the conclusion that to give it stability and robustness it needs an independant identity from other manosphere groups (MRA, Redpill, MGTOW, PUA), and needs centralised leadership which Redpill as a grassroots movement was unable to provide. By clearly defining how Neo-Masculinity differs from Redpill he's cata…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/15 07:39 PM
19

If she keeps up with her smear campaign, spin the publicity into more site hits and grow your business. People will want to go read your site to find out just what sort of 'monster' you really are, and might become followers when they see you aren't as presented.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 03:47 AM
11

I've spent a lot of time over the years in redpill circles. There is a lot of very useful pragmatic advice to be found, but as others have said its often wrapped up in a toxic culture. Unfortunately there is rarely any equivalent advice that is politically correct or acceptable to talk about outside of those circles. Unfortunately spending time in the redpill culture has its own disadvantages, both to wellbeing and outside judgment. Much of the advice is sound, but its amoral. By that I mean tha…
/r/ExRedPill05/11/14 04:48 PM
2

Campuses that have much less than 50% male attendance quickly lose popularity with female students. Apparently many colleges consider a 60-40 female/male ratio is the upper limit, because after that "students will notice" This is why some campuses have put in affirmative action policies to get more young men in. Not because men need help in education, but because if there aren't enough potential partners for the girls, enrolments will drop along with revenue. I don't see the anti-rape college tr…
/r/MensRights01/09/14 06:45 AM
4

The Daily Mail seems to have found a niche in peddling outrage journalism and click bait. While I'm not telling people not to be upset by this, be aware of media that plays on your emotions to further their agenda; in this case profit.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 06:10 AM
4

As long as young women sexually select for stoicism, the situation will not change.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 02:55 PM
7

Yeah, my motives for documenting child support was even called into question by the opposing attorney. What a disgusting double bind.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 05:27 AM
4

Looks like a textbook documentary of reciprocal domestic violence in cases where the man is cornered and provoked by a woman to strike at her. Then she gets to play the victim / be justified for everything that she did before he lashes out. I'm not condoning violence, just stating my opinion.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 03:58 PM
17

There are stories from other papers about this situation. Here's one from the BBC. Besides the allegation there was a boycott of Oxford Student Union events promoted by Sarah Pine, Oxford University Student Union Vice President for Women. She tried to discourage prestigious speakers from attending any talks including one for 'Stalking and Digital Abuse Awareness' Sounds like a political smear campaign to me where an opportunistic rad fem saw a chance to kill two birds with one stone by removing …
/r/MensRights22/06/14 12:15 PM
10

Eve Ensler, a well known feminist, wrote a play called the Vagina Monologues. In it there's a scene where a 13yo girl is given alcohol and statutorily raped by a 24yo woman. Its portrayed as a positive 'healing' experience. Granted, feminism isn't a monolith, not all feminists are like that etc etc, but that's where 'sexual assault by women against women is ok according to feminists' trope comes from. Edit: formatting
/r/MensRights20/06/14 08:46 AM
1

Indiana Jones agrees.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:51 AM
20

Have a look at /r/egalitarianism
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:30 AM
7

Also, I'd try to find a therapist for support if things are really getting to you. They can help you find a way through this mess so that you can think clearly to do what must be done without being intimidated.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 08:44 AM
5

Fair one. Yes you're correct.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 12:58 PM
24

I'm guessing 'Staff Writers' is Tori Shepard. Edit: Also, the post in question was downvoted into oblivion. Never let that get in the way of outrage journalism though eh? You stay classy News.com.au
/r/MensRights11/03/14 11:05 AM
3

Its good to see articles like this. It sums up plenty of my critiques about modern feminism.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 09:47 AM
12

Interestingly enough, this is around the time Dr Warren Farrell was on the Board of NOW in New York (1971–74).
/r/MensRights23/02/14 08:48 AM
8

Not to mention the 'mistress' laws where you can be hit up for financially supporting a 'kept' women in another residence.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 08:45 PM
1

You are making 'gender' and 'sexuality' based insults into this special category that are more hurtful than others. You're also trying to twist this into my being dismissive of women's feelings being hurt. All I'm doing is pointing out that the suffering of women in toxic competitive spaces isn't special to the point of needing to be addressed as a priority.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 07:57 PM
9

Maybe not those exact words, but comments about sexual acts and people's mothers are something I've heard plenty of. If trolls thought insulting a guy for being a guy would be likely to emotionally destabilize someone, then they'd be throwing it around all over the place.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 09:10 AM
9

Trolls attempt to find and exploit emotional triggers. Women are perceived to be more vulnerable to misogynistic attacks, so this is what the trolls use. For comparison 'Your Momma!' comments are frequently targeted at other men.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 09:03 AM
1

The law 'should' include intentions, but like many other judgments made by the courts, I see it as just rationalisation for the end goal of finding compensation. For example, say a child will break into a factory and fall, becoming disabled. The judge will think 'Well there's a disabled child here who needs money for lifetime care. It doesn't matter that the factory had security and signage, what matters is that the factory has money and the child's parents do not.' The judgment will then ration…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 12:50 AM
4

I was looking for where I heard this, but I couldn't find it. It might have been a comment in the middle of one of her recent longer youtube clips, but the best bet would be to ask the lady herself. I too think that a more diplomatic letter would be appropriate in this case. Edit: My bad. It wasn't GWW, but another poster. Sorry for the confusion.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 08:01 PM
9

I'm not sure if you've actually talked to Karen about this, but I remember her asking to not intervene with Ryerson U because CAFE were undertaking their own quiet civil efforts to negotiate the fee away and she was concerned that intervention from the larger MHRM would jeopardise those negotiations. But hey, if GWW is cool with it I think its a great idea.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 07:19 PM
4

There are other places for things like that. /r/mensrants and /r/pussypass for instance.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 09:48 AM
10

uneducated radicals You mean the people that wrote Obama's speech?
/r/MensRights01/02/14 08:55 AM
29

When he eventually realises how he was indoctrinated with internalised misandry he will have such a reactionary backlash against feminism it will be unbelievable. The arrogance of some of the commentators saying that he's just 'exploring his own views' is maddening.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 01:57 PM
9

Tory Shepard is a feminist well known for trolling and misrepresenting the MRM as a collective of whacko misogynists. You can find more of her work here in this opinion piece (where she gets slammed in the comments) and also a critique of her by Paul Elam She also frames Dr Michael Flood as an 'expert witness' and refers to him as coming from the University of Wollongong's Centre for Research on Men and Masculinity, framing him as a legitimate neutral researcher when he's actually a feminist beh…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 02:15 AM
1

Reminds me of Michael Westen on Burn Notice with Yoghurt. When asked The writers actually went into detail about why yoghurt was a 'spy superfood' and why Michael would always be seen eating it.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 12:58 PM
0

It was amusing that Judd Apatow whiteknighted by trying to shame the guy through his girlfriend. "You'll lose your sex privileges via the female union if you ever question a woman about her sexuality"
/r/MensRights11/01/14 12:56 PM
1

Agreed on both counts. Hyperagency means that this will be placed squarely on his shoulders and sensationalised, while in many similar cases involving women its linked to her mental health rather than criminal intent.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 06:53 AM
3

I read an article that said in Canada and some European nations are no longer going to target prostitutes because they are victims and the "johns" are the real criminals Hyperagency and hypoagency at work again shaping perceptions of responsibility and control.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 08:51 AM
4

Us trans-dinosaurs aren't getting much love either :(
/r/MensRights06/12/13 01:08 AM
1

He doesn't think he deserves better. You can infer his chronically low self esteem through his body language in the photos.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 08:01 AM
1

Don't feed the troll people. Check his post history before taking the bait.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 08:43 PM
2

And without the natural blondes :(
/r/MensRights23/11/13 10:21 AM
9

Emotional manipulation isn't seen as abuse yet.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 05:26 PM
11

I don't think Australian men are lauded enough for the good things they do. There's a reason women from around the world try to poach us.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 03:04 PM
10

"Imagine how a child feels when your father says he feels emotionally damaged by your birth" Funny how they would never use that reasoning against a female rape victim.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 11:08 AM
3

Hyperagency at work once again.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 03:56 PM
3

To spin off hypo and hyper agency, he didn't fight hard enough for the child and the mother was mentally I'll and not responsible for her actions.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 04:58 AM
1

What about safe haven laws then. How does that mesh with LPs?
/r/MensRights13/11/13 02:53 PM
1

Stylish, but could make the rest of the semester a bit awkward.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 10:46 PM
7

Typical PC shaming from the talking heads. The simp on the left made me want to punch him.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 07:10 AM
1

Sounds like you know what to do. You just need to be kind to yourself when doing it. No ones going to look after your best interests except you mate. You found someone once. You can do it again.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 03:43 AM
1

Fair enough. I was unaware of the state law. Otherwise a recording might have been enough to order a DNA test from biodad. It sucks that justice is so expensive.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 02:00 AM
2

I don't think your issue is this girl. Its trusting in yourself that you will meet someone better that treats you right. Depression isn't a free pass to abuse others.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 01:50 AM
2

If he can identify the biological father to the court it might help him get off. If I was op I'd record any confronting conversation with his so where he asks her directly 'if the child is (friend's name)'
/r/MensRights27/10/13 01:44 AM
42

The more evidence is collected and put in the public sphere, the harder it is for denialists to pretend these things don't happen. I thought the guy was pretty level headed during the interview. I can't believe the gall of his GF "Don't you know we're meant to be together!?!"
/r/MensRights24/10/13 05:24 PM
5

Did the -7000 karma and the comment history of troll posts give it away? :P
/r/MensRights24/10/13 12:52 PM
6

They say that "issues of masculinity" can often promote "misogynistic and socialized hyper-masculine attitudes". Which is true! In context, the fact that they focus on misogyny in promotion of the event tells me that the vibe of it is 'How being masculine in certain ways hurts women.' I would prefer to attend a men's event that has a vibe of 'How being masculine in certain ways hurts men'.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 09:21 AM
3

I never see a reference to "gender-based" child abuse..
/r/MensRights11/10/13 04:37 AM
2

Cases like this are interesting though in that they highlight exactly where the discrimination occurs. In this case it shows that its not so much about the 'female victim' that makes for a harsh sentence, but a male perpetrator. So do you guys agree the discrepancy in sentencing is more on the perpetrator side of the equation (Hypo/hyper-agency)?
/r/MensRights04/10/13 12:27 AM
25

It would have been nice to see him stuck to his guns on this, but his initial evasion is obviously his true stance; egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 12:21 AM
6

Ask about the dating life for male porn stars. I heard from one in Jenna Jameson's autobiography that women will not touch them with a 10ft pole for anything serious.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 01:09 AM
3

Rudd was better at playing knifey spooney, pure and simple. I've never seen so many feints in the manner of all the 'almost comebacks' he did before actually re-taking the top job. But I agree that its less about gender and more about your opposition using whatever means they have at their disposal to bring you down. Julia was also more than happy to play the woman card when it gained her votes eg visits to Mama Mia, 'Women for Gillard' etc.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 02:02 PM
3

These are people whose rights are protected under our shield. If they are, were, or will be identifying as men they need to be taken care of. For transmen in particular it can be a shock to learn about the burdens of expected male gender roles in western society. From what I know there's a certain brand of radical feminism that demonizes the trans community (some crap about transwomen trying to steal victimhood from women and transmen betraying their sisters by trying to claim male privilege).
/r/MensRights02/10/13 06:57 AM
2

It was really good to see the psychologist speak with emotion about this. Its pretty clear he actually cares about those guys.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 09:25 PM
1

Poison. Offloading responsibility for her emotions onto the man. Typical abuse of hyperagency by stealth. I'm hypersensitive to crap like this now because I internalised this shit when I was younger. Its exhausting and ultimately unattractive to treat women this way. It also eventually destroys any motivation on the man's part to get involved with women because of the unreasonable burdens taken up by doing so.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 08:24 PM
17

I'm surprised to see Farrell wade into anti-feminism like this. Usually he's focused on raising men's issues independently of feminism, leaving the 'dirty work' to the Paul Elam's of the movement. I'm guessing his run in with the protestors at the university had an effect on him. I'm really hoping this series of men's right lectures will serve as the spearhead into getting an independant 'male studies' orientated gender studies course into universities. Once this happens then there is the opport…
/r/MensRights25/09/13 08:56 PM
10

Yeah, that's the biggest takeaway I got from the clip. She twisted 'Children are growing up without male influence' into an opportunity to spruik 'Lets chase down these deadbeat dads for cash'. Money will not fix the gaping hole in these childrens' emotional growth.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 08:18 PM
99

"It also highlighted disparity in the law of rape, which makes it impossible for a woman to be accused of the crime." Interesting to see this in the article too. Baby steps.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 05:17 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter