TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Proof_Boysenberry_74 Archive

View 0 posts and 30 comments by Proof_Boysenberry_74 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Of course it isn't. I hate when people bring this up. The entire thing about the loneliness epidemic is that it's about all relationships to others, not just romantic.
/r/MensRights19/02/26 08:17 AM
5

It's really that simple. I don't get how other people don't see it this way.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 04:34 PM
1

I mean the thing is I don't blame her for the situation as we weren't strangers, the thing I find questionable is letting it come to that situation in the first place. If the mood and the vibe had been different things would have gone diffrently and I might have enjoyed it but the fucked up thing is knowing that someone who is 16 can't really comprehend that entire situation and it's impossible to tell how they will feel about it in the future. And she should have known that, thats whats wierd a…
/r/MensRights13/01/26 12:50 AM
1

was 16. She was 24. Was ist assult? Not really. There was no penetration but i didn't feel comfortable. I did do a bad job at showing it and she stopped pushing anything once she realised. That in itself was not a bad situation although looking back at it now it's just wierd and creepy to think about it. Friends asking why I didn't fuck her is what made me feel fucked up though. I am glad to read others adressing it.
/r/MensRights12/01/26 11:13 PM
3

It's Impossible to vote for Mens Rights. It's Impossible to vote for most things. Thats the sad truth. Don't make yourself believe it's any different than that.
/r/MensRights12/01/26 11:03 PM
4

depends on the perspective, when you phrase it like that probably, yeah. The point I want to make is that almost 3/4 of the Population just go with the moral framework society offers
/r/MensRights29/11/25 10:17 PM
2

The assumption that toxic masculinity is systemic but expieriencing misandry isn't is so idiotic
/r/MensRights29/11/25 12:30 PM
23

Psychological studies show that only roughly 30% of people actually reach a coherent reflected state of morals they hold on to for the sake of being moral
/r/MensRights29/11/25 12:26 PM
2

Actually the biggest common factor is no record of mental health struggles which is a testament to how badly suicide prevention and mental healthcare fails men systemically, but yeah, divorces are up there.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 11:36 AM
2

Take into account that feminism freaks out about Femicides (which are statistically almost exclusiveley all homocides towards women even though they define it as being murdered because of gender). Roughly 80% of homozide victims are male. In other words when women die at a 1/7 the rate men are killed (including suizide), thats an issue that is talked and highlighted more heavily than the issue of men being killed at 7 times the rate. And I am really cutting low on the x7 rate, it's likely higher…
/r/MensRights24/11/25 11:34 AM
3

Yes and it's one of the most vile things as for some reason it seems to be free of scienitific foundation for a major part and everyone is just fine with it.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 11:14 AM
-2

Not not really. Communism and feminism are unrelated entirely in their identity but both oppose kapitalism and feminism likes to frame kapitalism as the cause for sexism so it's more of a "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" type of situation. Sexism in generell is present in all societal structures including every kommunist society.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 11:11 AM
8

Among the entire demographic? Sure. In any form of media? Rather not. I am german so I don't exactly how things are for you over there but I do have the impression that media is still majority anti trump. Over here in Europe it's insanely bad, so much framing all supported by fucking tax money that was implimented to keep media Independent. Independent my ass.
/r/MensRights22/11/25 09:46 PM
0

I am a christian myself and I fully understand you. The sad truth is that there are so few people puplically representing MRA since it's not a battle that can be won, feminism dosn't fight fair and everyone is falling for their disgusting framing although it's getting better and better steadily. Either way, they will find a way to frame any political oponent as misogynist or toxic and will celebrate that they managed to create that narative, they don't discuss to find any truth. It's an absolut …
/r/MensRights22/11/25 09:39 PM
2

There is a lot wrong with these Statements. Mental illness is a motive for both but Psychologie does not treat men and women diffrently psychologically (which it must!) Testosterone dosn't make more aggressive. Aggression and violence are vastly diffrent things. Aggression is expierienced and shown diffrently by gender due to hormones. If anything it's not that testosterone makes aggressive, it's that estrogen shifts the focus onto social aspects. Aggressive women manipulate and dominate in non …
/r/MensRights22/11/25 05:00 PM
1

Provokation won't get us anywhere mate. If you just pick up their stupid and wrong ways thats not going to help anyone. All the boys who are going to be potential victims of anyone need everyone to fight for them. Educate those who have been misinformed and don't start misinforming yourself. We need harmony to grow. We are not like them, we don't need to misrepresent the truth.
/r/MensRights22/11/25 04:47 PM
2

Glad you post this, we need positivity here.
/r/MensRights22/11/25 04:35 PM
1

Well the thing you need to understand about feminism (the leading force behind all things gendered nowadays) is that they focus on women. entirely. only. It's the idea of "women fighting for women". It's not that they are interested in wether there is or isn't a violence crisis, they are interested in "why and how are women suffering?" and thats what they tackle. They are also not interested in being part of tackling such an issue when it needs broad attention, every effort they make they make f…
/r/MensRights22/11/25 04:30 PM
2

There is, it's called "humanism" when you are for equal rights for all human beings. Many feminists will explicitly state to you that they are in fact not humanists. Thats why they call themselves feminists.
/r/MensRights22/11/25 04:02 PM
1

Look I totally understand but I disagree with a bunch of things. First of all there is the idea that genderroles are outdated and wrong. That is inherently the case and it's not quantifyable. So saying they are more wrong for women dosn't make sense to me. Yes women at the times suffered more severely at those norms, thats a diffrent topic, but I don't see how that justifies Handling the same issue diffrently as concepts. Second of all and most important, I heavily dislike it when people are vie…
/r/MensRights16/11/25 10:08 PM
1

I think it's a fair statement. Aggression is a trauma response and often connected with drug abuse. Traumatised men systemically don't really recieve any help, not like women do so they become violent. Drug abuse is also systemically affecting men. It's a symptom of systemically failing men. The wrong part is who people that say that put the blame and responsability on. The system is not just the goverment and feminism itself is at fault here ironically.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 07:09 AM
2

Well... things is we kind of do need feminism 😅 The movement still existst but basically it failed because: •Feminism tolerated it for the most part but didn't support it •Men affected by patriachal struktures rejected it harshly. Thats exactly the reason it basically failed. There were to few people supporting it, mostly gay and leftist men and this group was small in the 70s. Especially seeing how feminism didn't really consider them an ally frustrated many and really that is the reason for th…
/r/MensRights16/11/25 06:54 AM
2

If feminism wanted equality they would have never rejected the Men's liberation movement in the first place. They just want their turn now.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 09:12 AM
3

Oh sorry for not being clear about that, I don't see it as an excuse either but it's just the fact. No one is justified to comitt any crimes but every human acts out of reason. For every criminal there is a rational explanation to why they became criminals and 99.9% of these are of a social nature although biology also plays a role. But what I was trying to say is that there is A LOT of awareness for womens problems and a lot has been fixed on that front. I think that the majority of the problem…
/r/MensRights15/11/25 08:42 AM
2

How do we fix this: 🤷 all we can do is pull through and analyze. As I said, societal norms and structure are a script/code in a loop. Revise, adjust, improve. Feminism can't exclude men and it needs to fight for men and BE CAREFUL NOT TO MAKE IT WORSE. Validating crying men is good. Validating mens emotions is better. Validating mens expieriences is best. For men we need to do what we did for women a couple of centuries ago: Identify the inequalities, make them present, tackle the issues. We kno…
/r/MensRights13/11/25 02:48 PM
2

My expieriences growing up in a western european society: Emotions are the biggest elephant in the room. From being a child onwards you learn to surpress your emotions in various ways. for one the obvious "men don't cry". That is true, it's what Fathers teach children and what society teaches men. Comes from the simple fact that crying is a vulnerability and men can't be vulnerable, not in the armee, not at work, not infront of a Family that you want to feel safe and secure in. The father is sti…
/r/MensRights13/11/25 02:47 PM
2

First of all thanks for reaching out here, things are contiously getting worse with this whole gender war and as a woman you feel that in this space simply for using a phrase like patriachy. Just shows how sensible this topic has become for affected. There are many things to say and consider and in Order to understand exactly what perspectives you want a definition of what exactly you mean by patriachy would be helpfull. What I want to make clear first of all are the deeper connections and reaso…
/r/MensRights13/11/25 02:46 PM
2

This topic is much broader. It's all emotions. In many ways before men were forced by society not to show most emotions but you always had anger as a vent for this. Men can't be joyfull in a sense like children are, jealous as you correctly explained, sad because it's overwhelming and men are supposed to be the emotional anchors, annoyed because being annoyed at them invalidates women, etc. Reasoning goes much deeper and stems from evolutionary connections just as the reason for men having devel…
/r/MensRights13/11/25 12:35 PM
13

Just waiting for them to blame it on men
/r/MensRights13/11/25 12:10 PM
1

Idiotic statement. Testosterone plays a big role here. A little oversimplified but it basically makes men more impulsive. Mens and womens libido is triggered by visual stimuli, so seeing something attractive. Men just expierience that in a more intense way like they do with many things due to testosterone. But that dosnt mean men don't have any interests in romance, intimacy or an emotional connections to sex and their libido. I find it difficult to understand why someone would want a romantic r…
/r/MensRights04/10/25 02:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter