TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Proper_Frosting_6693 Archive

View 2 posts and 881 comments by Proper_Frosting_6693 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

He would still be attracted to you unless you really let yourself go! Plus you’d have a bond with the person, especially if you have shared children. It’s usually the opposite way around where the wife loses interest in the husband and in sex too. It doesn’t mean he isn’t attracted to younger, fitter women but women feel the same way.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 09:11 PM
–

Obviously to lock a man down BEFORE you the hit the wall and make it difficult for him to leave! Men are generally happy to stay married, especially to the girl that ran the race with them. Those that are post wall and entitled ain’t getting marriage anyway!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 06:22 PM
9

She’s 43 and I’m assuming single from what you’ve said! I wouldn’t take dating advice from bitter & failed!
/r/MensRights19/08/25 11:32 PM
–

It’s obvious that modern dating apps, instagram have amplified female hypergamy to the point they are happy to share the top guys (knowingly or unknowingly). It’s true women are never truly single as they have near limitless options for casual sex unless they’re truly hideous! Polygyny is the future where women will openly share the high value guy and as his leverage gets greater, he may demand more and more from these simping women (one sided open relationship, female providers etc). Many moder…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 11:27 AM
2

Just highlights that THERE IS NO NOBILITY IN CUCKOLDRY!
/r/MensRights11/08/25 12:32 PM
–

The biggest lie women tell themselves is that the hookup guy was just for a hookup. Unless in the extreme circumstances where he is a dangerous criminal, all these women would love to be his girlfriend! Mid women pretending not to want the hot Chad, way out of their league for a relationship has to be the biggest lie they tell themselves! “Sure, you really want the mid guy on your level”. That’s like saying I only wanted Dua Lipa for fun but wouldn’t date her! Gaslighting themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 09:10 PM
10

Basically modern feminism is a nihilistic movement!
/r/MensRights08/08/25 12:25 PM
2

Only Israeli men are evil by default!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 11:06 AM
4

Rage bait
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 11:25 AM
1

No I’m not saying that they turn them down! I’m saying the roster has alot of mid women as well as a few attractive ones. The mid ones, less effort, just come over. Hot ones would need to go out etc. You seem to be under estimating how much attention hot women get. Also the majority of women aren’t looking for hookups, hence the dating app mismatch. All the best looking guys I know banged a lot of mid women, especially when drunk.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 05:26 PM
1

Most guys sleep down! Especially Chads if they want high numbers! Totally false
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 05:02 PM
4

Beta bucks is usually a guy ON HER LEVEL but not as attractive as the Chads she shared that ran through her previously. It’s an awful deal for the guy as he’s dating down in every way and just settling bad! Given how difficult average guys have it, they often take these terrible deals.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 10:28 AM
3

Bonnie Blue is below average! You prove nothing there. Only Fans is for SIMPS, losers, low value men! Men don’t share unless they’re cucks, only women do!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 07:53 PM
5

They should just close nightclubs down at this stage! What’s the point in going out if you are just going to get #MeToo’d by some woman
/r/MensRights26/07/25 06:22 AM
3

Women are sharing the top guys obviously 🙄! Top = best looking! The beta bucks are then for settling: these guys will need to prove their worth, wait for sex etc and are generally unattractive to women on their level. This is why it’s so important to filter for dual mating strategists (promiscuous women) that will only divorce and pillage the guys they “settle for”.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 08:29 PM
1

No, pointless
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 11:42 AM
3

Feminism was originally about equality which I would have supported! But if you give any powerful group what they want, then they look for more. Now it’s just a quest for supremacy! It’s like the Woke Democrats giving trans rights too much leeway and you ended up with Child Mutilation (“gender affirming”) surgeries! Fkn insane!
/r/MensRights21/07/25 08:50 PM
0

Being Beta Bucks is the last thing most men want! Pay for dates, dinner etc while she bangs Chad after as she’s just not ready to sleep with you, Billy Beta. Now escorts is a different thing, you pay for a service, you’re guaranteed to get what you want and for any SIMP, this is always a better option than being used by Only Fans 304s for nothing!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 10:54 PM
30

Worked with two raging misandrists (that identified as feminists) and eventually had to leave! Men can’t complain unfortunately
/r/MensRights20/07/25 11:51 AM
67

Go work in an office with women and listen!
/r/MensRights20/07/25 11:29 AM
2

Especially at similar ages! The 35yr old winner isn’t going to pick a 35yr old woman with heavy baggage and perhaps kids from another man.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 09:39 AM
1

I’ve posted before that polygyny is the future with female providers providing for their shared good looking Chad! It’s already going that way with most young women sharing (knowingly or unknowingly). Soon the Chad (who is better looking but often useless bar his looks) will realise his power and demand they provide for him. That coupled with women outperforming men in college will lead to this future. They get to share his DNA 🧬 and his face for instagram photos. Hypergamy trumps all!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 10:19 PM
7

“Whether misandry is real”?? Are they all idiots? Do they also believe the Earth 🌍 is flat?
/r/MensRights14/07/25 02:12 PM
10

This, exactly this! If she’s been a 304 then she better be a 304 to the husband otherwise he will assume (currently) she’s not really attracted to him and is settling.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 07:44 AM
1

What I’m saying is if he doesn’t pay, everyone else (The State) will have to! How is that not clear? I DONT WANT TO PAY FOR CHAD’s BASTARD!
/r/MensRights10/07/25 05:33 PM
-1

Do you not understand how taxes work? Who do you think pays for child benefit, single mother supports etc?? Maybe where you live it’s different
/r/MensRights10/07/25 07:40 AM
-2

Yes that’s my point! The taxes of other men are to be transferred to the mother of kid with the dead beat father! How is this fair for men in society? The dead beat should pay his own dues! I don’t want to be funding some loser’s bastard!
/r/MensRights09/07/25 05:54 PM
-11

Ah the man doesn’t seem to have any accountability here according to your story? By deciding not to use protection, it’s on him! Why should all the other men in society pay to raise his mistake?? If you crash your car, should I pay for it? At the end of the day, the child needs a present father! Dead beat dads should not be encouraged!
/r/MensRights09/07/25 10:08 AM
1

Exactly! The majority of being desired is being born naturally attractive and secondly tall. Money only attracts gold diggers that don’t actually want you! Everyone should however, strive to be the best version of themselves as that’s the best shot they’ll have.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 11:27 PM
1

Insecure = Toxic Feminist Misandrist Shaming word for not bending to their will and having standards! But to address your point, red pill does attract a lot of angry men that have been screwed over by the misandrist family law system or treated terribly by women. Red Pill awareness also makes it harder to find relationships because its easier to see red flags (you’re less likely to marry a 304 when you now know she’s highly likely to cheat/divorce rape you and isn’t really attracted to you at al…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 11:19 PM
11

The reality is, while dual mating strategies are prevalent, women often catch feelings for the hookup guy (who’s attractive) and wants more than the other way around. Men sleep down and women sleep up casually (unless extremely promiscuous) therefore it’s far more likely the less attractive party (the woman) will be the one that ends up wanting more while the more attractive party (the man) will be less willing to invest/commit. While some hookups start out as just sex, it often leads to one par…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 11:14 PM
84

Translation = Being attractive is much better than being unattractive!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 11:06 PM
1

It’s mostly women’s fault for incorrectly assessing male attractiveness
/r/MensRights08/07/25 06:17 PM
4

The biggest lie of all time!
/r/MensRights08/07/25 01:34 PM
3

It’s like that toxic made up film on incels (Adolescence) as if it was some issue while south Asian rape gang marauders rape countless young girls but can’t be called out for woke hipster liberal reasons!
/r/MensRights07/07/25 08:28 PM
1

So delusional and out of touch with reality!
/r/MensRights07/07/25 08:25 PM
1

Women want to bang Chads! Women want Beta provider (on their attractiveness level) to SIMP hard, wait weeks for sex (probably while banging Chads after you drop them home from dates) and gaslight you if you have an issue with their high body counts! When they ultimately cheat (highly likely if they have high body counts) it’s somehow your fault as you didn’t make her feel special. Oh and to top it all off, some SIMPS will be expected to raise Chad’s bastard as he’s a broke loser (but attractive …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 10:32 PM
1

I would say I’m relatively happy! Only discovered red pill 3 years ago. I’m married with 3 kids in a high paying job with good family supports. I have a good work life balance. The red pill just validated my choice in the wife I choose (non promiscuous, wants to be an actual wife and mother, lets me lead etc). I do see the community as pretty unhappy but I think it would be far worse to marry a promiscuous cheating feminist that despises men and only looks to use men for what they can extract fr…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 08:18 PM
6

It’s only 30% in cases where it is suspected! That would be few cases. It’s really 1-5% but not insignificant
/r/MensRights02/07/25 08:09 PM
16

“Why Monogamy Feels Impossible for Some Women” Aka the ran through ones! Any high body count women are NOT MARRIAGE MATERIAL! Their solution to relationship problems is to jump on the next cock!
/r/MensRights02/07/25 03:45 PM
1

The exceptions don’t disprove the general truth! Sure Bezos could have got a 22yr old if he wanted, no doubt! But he obviously liked her! But in general, this is just not the way things work! Older successful guys date younger women. Period!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 08:43 PM
1

Let’s be honest, it’s partially true but even if they weren’t naive and easier to manipulate men would still be MORE attracted to young women! 1) Lower body counts, greater ability to pair bond and be happy in a relationship 2) Less entitled. Doesn’t delusional think their SMV has gone up into older age just because their career has progressed. 3) More likely to let the man be a man and lead 4) Less disagreeable 5) Happier with simplistic life Etc So so so many reasons!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 02:22 PM
2

Toxic masculinity = misandrist phrase
/r/MensRights27/06/25 07:37 AM
2

Take records! Misandry is a real issue these days! I worked with a few toxic feminists previously! You need evidence as men (before Trump ended DEI) basically has the same rights as dogs
/r/MensRights26/06/25 08:13 PM
24

Men don’t care and shouldn’t care! The older used up, ran through women with no SMV left are just resentful! Men realise this and still continue to date younger women. Men should be extra proud and not anyway shameful for following the optimal strategy! Don’t let toxic misandry shame you! Just own it and turn it around on any misandrist “are you saying that this younger woman isn’t mentally capable? Is she not a consenting adult? Are you saying she’s inferior to a young man??”
/r/MensRights25/06/25 10:23 AM
4

While this is great in theory, in reality the state then (aka everybody else) has to pay to raise his child! That only works if the woman is financially well off.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 10:11 AM
1

Are they though? Them seem more ran through than in the past! Most are hooking up with some Chad way out of their league that has 5 similar girls on his roster. They might be choosier with the SIMP Beta Provider that they feel entitled to though.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 08:34 PM
1

The only take away here is to be open about your preferences and have ZERO shame for them! If they’re not illegal, then they’re perfectly valid! Don’t want a run through feminist for more than casual fun, no problem! Maybe just say it after you pump & dump
/r/MensRights06/06/25 06:00 PM
1

Modern relationships are very transactional! Therefore if you want more beauty than you have yourself, you need to bring more to the table to offset this. Aka a 40yr old guy ain’t getting a 23yr old hot blonde without providing as that girl really wants a 25yr old Chad. So the 40yr old needs to offer more in other ways. If the girl is on or around your level then less is expected. What exactly about providing is your issue? Buying a meal? Or is it someone expecting you to pay for everything?…if …
/r/MensRights05/06/25 08:02 PM
2

Is you don’t want to be a provider, don’t be! It’s that simple. Some women that expect that are often run through feminists that are going through the epiphany phase (28-35) therefore you can’t take them seriously as they aren’t traditional women themselves so why would you be a traditional provider male? For the guys women are actually attracted to, they don’t care so much about what he can provide. They just want to be with him! Be this guy!
/r/MensRights05/06/25 04:29 PM
1

No one is saying women aren’t allowed to have a casual fun bucket but that bucket is usually compromised of guys way out of your league, that you pine for and the guy won’t commit to you therefore you settle for a situationship. We just advise men that girls that engage in this behaviour make for poor long term relationships. It’s no different from you advising women to avoid players for relationships.
/r/MensRights30/05/25 08:28 PM
1

But a man nowadays can have all the benefits of marriage (sex, kids etc) without the risk of divorce. Married men do better as in general (earn more etc) they’re better options for women. Just don’t get married.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 10:52 PM
1

I think more men than ever have redpill awareness these days and it’s only growing! Mainstream left media will try to subjugate it definitely but most men are aware. Yes, the same stories do get tiresome in the Manoswamp. You just need to get your info and get out!
/r/MensRights27/05/25 05:00 PM
-4

5 ain’t that bad! Main thing is did she hookup with you or did she make you wait 3-6 dates. You definitely don’t want someone running dual mating strategies (where she bangs the hot dude immediately but makes you wait). That’s huge cheating risk!
/r/MensRights27/05/25 03:28 PM
7

This is akin to driving with your eyes closed though! For casual, just make sure she’s clean. But for marriage, have to open the eyes
/r/MensRights27/05/25 03:27 PM
16

Congratulations for having standards, unlike most desperate men now days! YES PAST MATTERS! Only toxic feminists (misandrists) that try to shame men into making poor choices think otherwise. Divorce, cheating, infidelity are strongly correlated with body count and sexual past. Much easier for women to cheat/monkey branch/move on with a promiscuous past. These women are best kept in the casual fun bracket.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 03:23 PM
0

1) My past doesn’t matter (even though it clearly does) 2) Income requirements especially for high earning females 3) Excessive height requirements 4) Expecting a top 1% guy for a relationship when you are bang on average female just because a 1%er pumped and dumped you on a slow Tuesday. 5) Entitlement
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 09:12 AM
1

The Red pill is about making men aware that these women are undateable!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 07:22 PM
-3

Most men have zero options, that’s not subjective. If the guy has lots of options (that aren’t monsters {subjective yes}, then he’s probably top 20% in attractiveness). How attractive you are depends on how women (in general) treat you. You don’t need to be a genius to work out that a guy like Dan Bilzerian has more options than a regular guy and you don’t need to be a genius to see most of those women are very attractive. I think the vast majority of people (especially men) can judge attractive…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 07:18 PM
-8

The man’s options that pumped and dumped her! How many women of similar attractiveness does he have on his roster…how many are better looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 04:11 PM
0

They can’t all be that stupid! You are basically saying they’re the same as blue flies that fly blindly into the electric light that kills them
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 04:09 PM
1

What if she earns significantly more or has more wealth? Most couples have nothing when they marry. Although I do agree a wealthy man should avoid marriage as he can get all the benefits without inviting the state into his life.
/r/MensRights14/05/25 04:35 PM
1

She’ll have many CASUAL options with HVM! A HVM doesn’t want to be a cuck and raise another man’s bastards in 90% of cases. Try not to confuse options for casual sex with serious commitment. These women end up going from guy to guy to guy. One caveat to that is she can get commitment from guys below her looks level if she’s sufficiently hot!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 11:30 PM
2

The Red pill is just a guide, no gospel! It’s more about avoiding problems with women and avoiding making poor choices …in your case, marrying (as a virgin) a promiscuous woman would most likely be a terrible idea (it’s terrible idea in general)! There are loads of different ways to meet and connect with women and many that suit your life and style. I only learned about the redpill after I got married and I’m married over 10 years with two kids. Learning about the red pill before that could have…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 10:31 PM
-3

See below, better answer https://youtu.be/sUUaVQjvSGc?si=vSI7gaJJuzC8_ZBU
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 06:54 PM
-4

https://youtu.be/sUUaVQjvSGc?si=vSI7gaJJuzC8_ZBU Better answer
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 06:53 PM
6

Dating apps
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 05:21 PM
25

Raising with modern feminism = raising them to be slaves. Teach them about equality sure but not supremacy (selective equality that feminists really seek)
/r/MensRights01/05/25 03:40 PM
13

The issue is women equate sex = relationship value. They can’t “get” the guys they sleep with (for a relationship) and just end up in situationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 03:39 PM
11

Modern “Feminists” are just toxic misandrist supremacist! They’ve made a movement that was originally setup to advocate for equality into something many women now cannot associate with. In dealing with women, it’s quite simple: if she’s a modern “feminist” (double standard beliefs, selective equality, not just saying I believe in equality) then just think “great, short term casual”.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 08:42 PM
0

Try pick out the 99.9% of winners and not the 0.01% bad apples please
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 07:11 PM
4

Ah no, a guy that dates a much younger is a WINNER by most definitions! Look at all super successful males and they have younger women! These men are winners and all men see that. Even the women do too but they’re resentful!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 12:10 PM
2

Grew up together, was a good friend and still is.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 06:44 PM
4

Not necessarily! My best friend (a Chad in his 20s mostly treated women like shit), never understood why.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 05:37 PM
5

Why would any Chad who gets everything he wants from women be in any way misogynistic? Some are but it’s really like beating slaves. They grant all his wishes. Most people would be happy with people that treated them like this! Chad also invented feminism to benefit himself! Encouraged women to get ran through by Chads like him and tried to gaslight regular guys into accepting these women (this is mostly failing though) Encouraged women to earn more so Chads don’t even have to pay a cent. Can ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 05:33 PM
9

It’s total lack of accountability! If you want to get ran through, fine, that’s your choice! But it makes you less desirable for a long term relationship! Imagine a guy that was grossly overweight and said my weight doesn’t matter…nobody would take him seriously.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 01:27 PM
61

Just reminds me of the following article: https://www.wsj.com/lifestyle/relationships/american-women-are-giving-up-on-marriage-54840971 An average looking woman turning 30 is complaining she can’t find a man that meets her standards despite 10,000 hours of dating! How can she not see that’s she’s the common denominator? Can you imagine the body count after all those hours dating? Must be in the hundreds. Naturally she got pumped and dumped by the guys she wanted as they were all way out of her l…
/r/MensRights22/04/25 10:13 AM
2

I never agreed women are dump or subservient! That’s more manoswamp than red pill! Women as measured by IQ scales have similar intelligence to men so to say otherwise is stupidity! I do think when men are horny, they (temporarily) can make stupid decisions. Women are definitely smarter in this area.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 11:31 PM
0

So basically most men! All those outside the top 20%.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 07:29 PM
5

This is very true and shows for the majority of men, hookers are a better option. At least the hooker that isn’t you is actually hot and not below average and entitled.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 07:27 PM
9

If you’re not top 20% in looks but financially successful in life then it’s hard to disagree! Options: 1) Date average to below average looking women with delusional expectations that bring next to nothing to the table and expect the table. 2) Sleep with hot young women in their 20s and you have a multitude of options for not a high cost. Women, especially feminists are scared that men will realise the price of sex is low and are worried that men will generally disregard most of them giving up o…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 07:23 PM
0

Horny men are stupid, especially for sex. They take reckless risks and hence why they get caught more. Women are definitely smarter and strategic when it comes to cheating, hence why men need to vet any LTR thoroughly.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 05:49 PM
0

The barrier to entry is higher for men…aka need cash and usually a lot of it to cheat regularly. Women only need a pulse
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 05:47 PM
0

Because men are stupid when they cheat! Women are far more careful & calculated. For the men, the logic and rational thinking goes out the window when they want some.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 02:25 PM
-2

In 2025 women cheat more then men (men cheated more in the past and women are better at concealing it) as they have endless opportunities for casual sex. It stands to reason that if they have endless opportunities then many many guys would take the chance if they got it, as most guys get so few. I Personally don’t wouldn’t but the world is filled with endless SIMPS thirsting.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 09:35 AM
–

Your post basically sums up two words: Chad wins! Women will chase the 5%, often way out of their league, who will pump & dump them or they’ll have to share him. Polygyny is the future. Bottom 80% might as well just try to find happiness some other way. The juice won’t be worth the squeeze.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 08:25 PM
5

The rabbit hole of endless bitching about women etc Just get the important knowledge, what red flags to look for, putting yourself first etc
/r/MensRights16/04/25 05:21 PM
16

Just don’t try to convince anyone about marriage! Just don’t get married. “It just never happened” Don’t go too far down the Manoswamp though, just get the top level information and get out. Work on yourself, make a long term plan for what you would like to get out of life and go implement that plan. Don’t live for the day.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 04:31 PM
2

Supremacy
/r/MensRights13/04/25 06:48 PM
1

The “good looking bro” is just going to pump and dump them
/r/MensRights05/04/25 07:41 PM
0

I’m not complaining! I’m just telling it like it is?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 10:34 PM
2

Women tend to be the ones that lose interest in sex with their provider husbands! But they’d still give it to a Chad! It’s obviously not fine as the man doesn’t get the main thing he entered the relationship for in the first place!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 07:54 PM
3

Women love men opportunistically! Aka what they can get from them! He’s only as useful as what he can provide. They love their children unconditionally! Plus maybe a few chads…but in general the love isn’t the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 06:21 PM
11

It’s kinda like asking why the Germans wanted to be Nazis in the 1930s or why Israelis want to be Nazis at the moment…supremacist movement! Makes it easier to dehumanise your opposition (for feminists that’s men).
/r/MensRights26/03/25 03:24 PM
1

Standard toxic feminism double standard!
/r/MensRights26/02/25 01:31 PM
1

“I want a traditional woman” generally means I don’t want an entitled ran through Hoe!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 06:15 PM
–

But that’s total nonsense! They only care about themselves! Trump cares more about Palestinians than these feminists care about third world women!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 04:36 PM
–

If it was true, the feminists wouldn’t shame them!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 04:34 PM
–

If most men just weren’t complete despicable white knight SIMPs and had some standards, we wouldn’t need a passport bro movement!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 04:31 PM
0

It’s still for the best! Nobody wants a ran through mid gold digger that feels like she’s settling for her looks match due to the baggage inflicted by the guys way out of her league!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 05:08 PM
79

Whatever you do, don’t throw your whole life away to the first girl that touches your pee pee. Just make life about you. Get escorts if lonely etc
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 08:52 AM
–

Enthusiastic consent = sex with Chad All non-Chads are rapists in Feminists minds
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 10:01 AM
1

I wouldn’t go to war in general!
/r/MensRights23/12/24 02:33 PM
1

Ok interesting results! Surprising given the lack of validation but the sample size of 161 was very small. Plus 2015 was early instagram days. I’d love to see a 2024 study with 1000+ participants in the Instagram age
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 06:14 PM
1

Most people overrate their own attractiveness, both men and women. Men don’t receive the same social media validation and SIMPING that the majority of women do so I’d expect them to overrate themselves less overall.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 04:32 PM
1

Late 30s, still attracted but we met in our 20s. I would not start off with an older woman!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 11:33 PM
2

It’s true they only want attention from Chad in their 20s but when bills need to be paid or their kids wanted, they’ll need a provider and they can’t have him off ignoring them! He’ll need to be a good Beta SIMP and STEP UP!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 11:31 PM
-1

I would date one that was divorced over a childless one that’s been ran through any day! Ran through is for fun only
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 12:19 AM
3

Yes of course but you need to filter out poor matches! Promiscuous single mothers might be decent people but they’re also generally a poor choice for a single man. That’s pretty much undisputed! So you filter out the undesirables and work on humanness for the people that are worth investing your time into.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 12:18 AM
1

I’m just quoting the general red pill advice! But agreed
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 09:19 PM
17

Yes and believe all Disney movies
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 03:26 PM
2

Or hire me for coaching! Please, I’m a “millionaire” so I charge $70/minute for the internet’s biggest SIMPS/fools etc
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 03:25 PM
2

Agreed! They really should advocate more so but in general most advice is to wrap up so you’re not caught supporting an unwanted child! But if you do father a child, then you have the responsibility to raise YOUR BIOLOGICAL CHILD rather than Chad’s bastard. You’re just a loser if you don’t!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 03:21 PM
8

Redpill is about awareness of female nature, male nature and the dating market! It’s actually pretty simple and straightforward. The Manosphere is filled with grifters repeating the same stories with slight variations over and over! Grift Cooper, Rollo etc I mean it doesn’t take a million horror stories to learn: don’t date single mothers avoid promiscuous women for LTRs don’t SIMP Put yourself first (unless you have kids) don’t date toxic feminists supremacists (4th wave) Etc. You only need to …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 11:16 AM
1

“Maintain your quality of life” proves my point. You can actually afford children you just don’t want to compromise
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 07:36 PM
4

Why would the relationship be unhappy? Most people are happy in relationships. I’m taking about a 25yr old girl, that probably not in a rush to start a family and is enjoying single like, all the validation, in her prime looks etc vs a 40yr old who’s window has passed and may have deep regrets! Especially considering 80% of childless women didn’t intent to be childless according to a 2010 study by Professor Renske Kaiser. Therefore it’s very hard for me to believe the 40yr old who has failed to …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 03:45 PM
-3

While that’s all true, I suppose I’m just tired of the white lies that people claim that things are too expensive when it’s not the real truth! The real truth is they just don’t want kids…SO JUST SAY THAT!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 01:48 PM
4

Do you think the government cares about the happiness of the parent? They want workers, productivity etc
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 01:47 PM
2

Ok sure, believe 40yr old single childless are just as happy as 25yr old ones…delusional 🤦‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 01:45 PM
0

Lack of constant validation & simping (most young women are instagram/tik tok junkies/addicts that crave validation), increasing weight, fading looks, loneliness as others settle down etc etc etc
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 12:51 PM
3

That’s probably only true for girls in their 20s who get loads of free attention and validation. I doubt it’s true past 30
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 11:14 AM
18

Sorry to hear things haven’t worked out but there is still time. You’ll just need to be very proactive about it: Don’t expect guys to read minds or vibes etc If you like a guy just tell him Cut out anyone that isn’t aligned with your goals (family) Don’t chase guys out of your league, they won’t commit Show those guys why you’re a great catch Hope it works out!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 11:14 AM
-10

The things are expensive is just an excuse as the poorest countries have the highest fertility rate! When people say “it’s too expensive” to have kids, they really mean “I don’t want to have kids”…sure there are some exceptions but most people in the west are well off enough to raise a single child.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 11:09 AM
2

By viewing average as below average and only classifying 20% of the male population as attractive, then you will only seek to date up! Aka above your level, especially if you (woman) are average.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 02:42 PM
-3

Hypergamy! Human evolution required this!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 12:43 PM
9

A entitled whore from a wealthy upbringing struggling with accountability for her actions. No doubt a total feminist!
/r/MensRights16/12/24 11:57 AM
1

The guy that’s being shared by 5 women probably considers himself single while some (but not all) of the women consider themselves in a relationship, even if it’s never been discussed. They just assume
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 11:55 AM
2

For long term relationships most guys care! For short term they don’t! Similar to finances. Nobody wants to marry an ex hooker/only fans sex worker etc just like nobody wants to marry some in massive debt. FYI- most people ask these questions indirectly! Aka “do you like your job”, “have you travelled a lot” etc
/r/MensRights15/12/24 05:30 PM
7

Lilly Philips = Whore! It’s pretty simple
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 04:21 PM
12

“What’s your salary?” best responded to by “What’s your body count?”
/r/MensRights15/12/24 03:45 PM
–

Women are happy to share in 2024! No news here
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 10:17 PM
4

Of the whole population of course! But if you look at the younger demographic, say 18-35 there is a high rise in single men, more than double the rate of single women. 63% vs 31%.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 05:16 PM
4

Situationships are pretty common nowadays! But the rest not common but I think the future
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 11:35 AM
2

Basically never become this guy (A modern American Beta SIMP): https://youtube.com/shorts/CEIy5PLcecg?si=K4ebxKrvpDB6_RVM
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 01:17 AM
7

It’s already happening! Situationship are normalised where multiple women share the same guy rather than date a guy on their level. I said it’s the future, as women earn more and more. It’s driven by dating apps, instagram etc…it’s not a hard stretch to extrapolate what the future will look like given present dating trends
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 01:14 AM
1

SIMPS basically! The lowest form of man
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 02:08 PM
1

Wow you’re an idiot! People can make observations based on experience. I never once said they were hard stats. They’re just estimates based on experience. It doesn’t have to be written down. I didn’t reference a study! Please educate yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 01:41 PM
0

Why would it be a lie? Kinda retarded to say that one observation = everything I say is a lie! When I go to the coffee shop and ask for a latte, am I lying?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 10:26 PM
4

To highlight reality and disprove the Disney fairytales
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 07:29 PM
0

Life
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 07:28 PM
13

Yeah the Chads they’re sharing through situationships, one sided open relationships etc will never treat them well as those average girls are a dime a dozen for those Chads. This is why polygyny with female providers is the future! They’re so mesmerised by Chad, they’ll accept any demands he come up with: she remains exclusively to him while he can sleep around she provides for him (difficult for hypergamous nature but with women earning a lot nowadays, likely in future) she openly shares him as…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 04:51 PM
0

Dates, probably top 25%, the 40-75% get the “DTF”/“Wanna come over” text as Chad is busy! He doesn’t have time to wine & dine all the women he’s running through and often Chads are losers outside women (working dead end jobs, unemployed or criminals) so can’t afford to date. But the point is these women in the 40-75% aren’t chasing guys on their level! They’re just disappointed Chad only sent them a DTF text? They feel used
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 03:51 PM
–

Women like to chase CHAD! Average guys could live and die and wouldn’t notice unless he got rich or was super high status.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 02:28 PM
2

I was talking in general terms
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 08:27 AM
3

By summing up the situation, I have given the answer. Average women can sleep way out of their league but will struggle to get relationships until they’re ready to settle for their looksmatch: https://youtube.com/shorts/CEIy5PLcecg?si=weT8J2b0iULCQpQx
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 09:24 PM
0

OLD is only for top 5% Chads looking to sleep around with average looking women or vice versa. Below top 20% guys are just cash cattle or pay pigs! All they do is hopelessly contribute revenue to the site. It’s basically a casino for them with little chance of winning anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 05:51 PM
6

Very backwards! All metrics show kids from single mother households do worse than any other household demographic! That includes from single father households
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 05:47 PM
6

You diminish the importance of fatherhood! Clearly you’re not a father! For older children I would argue fathers are more important but for younger children mothers are. The only main difference is carrying the child for the 9 months plus recovery. After that both parents are essential! Motherhood is not conscription! We do not live in the 1300s. So no, I don’t need to try again! Asking a parent to serve in a conscription or administrative office hundreds of miles behind the front lines is a sma…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 05:05 PM
5

I understand it’s physical and men are better at it due to being physically stronger BUT that doesn’t mean women can’t do it! They could drive trucks/tanks/APC etc. they can also shoot etc
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 04:50 PM
10

The fathers dying on the frontlines did their part too before the war raising those kids! I don’t see how an administrative job hundreds of miles behind the front lines is so bad?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 04:48 PM
10

What about a childless 40 year old women? Arguably she should be sacrificed first?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 04:32 PM
8

We need more women on the front lines, especially those over the age of 40 and childless. They shouldn’t have any special protections that aren’t afforded to men. Women of child bearing age or with children could be conscripted but allocated safer (behind the front) roles as an army is a major logistical company in essence.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/24 04:31 PM
-5

Must have been a Chad! She’s cute for 30
/r/MensRights09/12/24 03:16 PM
1

But it’s ok for her to leave the family and kids if she’s unhappy? As it’s all about her happiness
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 03:28 PM
1

4 long paragraphs to highlight the obvious title!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 11:44 AM
2

Yes but that doesn’t equate with her having slept around with loads of guys. She may just have been adventurous in past monogamous relationships. I wouldn’t be looking for a virgin. Just not a Hoe that’s high cheating risk
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 08:24 PM
0

Active sex life WITH ME! Be willing to try things monogamously with me. It doesn’t always have to equal getting run through by a train of Chads!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 06:41 PM
1

No, I just don’t want the whore!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 09:54 AM
0

Can be both! Do you not understand how sex works? Active sex life within a relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/24 09:54 AM
4

Already found 😉
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 05:52 PM
-5

I never said that isn’t an option either
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:33 PM
-12

Well it is really! If the wife is non filling her obligations (intimacy) to her partner then he isn’t required to fulfil his (loyalty). It’s the same in reverse. Naturally with considerations for illness, pregnancy etc
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:16 PM
0

Husband isn’t entitled to sex = wife isn’t entitled to marriage or loyalty!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:10 PM
0

Ah…got it!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 03:16 PM
1

Your title implied you were broke: “would you date a broke woman”
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 03:16 PM
1

Why do you consider yourself broke then if you’ll soon have full time employment? Is this more “temporarily broke”?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 01:41 PM
1

It wouldn’t put me off unless she was unwilling to change! It’s obviously a red flag but could be worked on. If she had other desirable characteristics to make up for it, it wouldn’t be a deal breaker. But I would not bail her out!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 01:40 PM
0

This guy has rated over 20,000 faces, that he’s actually paid to rate! I’d say he’s a pretty good understanding of actual attractiveness given the black pill is all about looks. His approach is objective, not based on feeling etc. It’s based on measurable quantifiable characteristics like facial symmetry, facial ratios, body fat % etc. His results are close to normally distributed: https://youtu.be/Jsj6Qr7Z7o0?si=DGP03qshTkcjQuGY This is just one example.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 12:40 PM
6

Loyalty/no history of cheating Low body count Good communicator Wants to be a mother Wants to be a wife not just have a big day out & ring Genuinely attraction between both Active sex life Not bad with money Not modern feminist/misandrist Doesn’t struggle with accountability Organised Cares about making spouse happy Aligned goals emotionally stable no addiction issues non violent
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 10:43 AM
1

Men do not receive the same validation women receive on social media, where most people spend hours every day. Women can go around believing they’re 9s when they’re average (5s) as a guy that’s a 9 might sleep with them occasionally. However he will never commit to a 5, which is what the girl wants so she’s still a 5. He will only commit to someone near his attractiveness level. Men in reverse never/rarely sleep up based on their looks and do not get the constant gasing/simping women receive. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 10:36 AM
0

I believe attraction is mostly defined and measurable and if measured correctly, should be normally distributed. The skew is only due to delusional expectations created by instagram etc rather than actual measurable attractiveness. Women have proven to be very poor at rating male attractiveness from dating app data as the data is nowhere near normally distributed. This isn’t the true distribution as men can also rate attractiveness and from other studies I’ve seen on attractiveness it’s pretty c…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 10:31 AM
1

This is false! Population characteristics are normally distributed! You may have a point that dating apps do over represent unattractive males! However the AI should base ratings off the total population and have a large standardised database for reference. Therefore you may still end up with 80% 5 and below. It’s also true that the very best looking women don’t use the apps, unless it’s some elite app to meet rich guys. Women in general (due to simping and social media gasing) just over estimat…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 09:14 AM
2

I think the main hope is not all women are like that! If they were they wouldn’t the bar for casual wouldn’t be so high. About 20-30% are Hoes, the rest generally have sex in relationships. They might have got played in a situationship once or twice. This is why body count is so important! If you filter for that, you’ll keep the Hoes to casual/FWB status and avoid ending up like the video.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 04:41 PM
2

It’s not impossible! It’s difficult to be 100% accurate hence the +-1pt so that would give the AI a fairly large margin for error. It should also be able to determine if any filters were used and photos should be comprehensive and in certain poses to determine actual attractiveness (symmetry, height, body fat etc)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 04:10 PM
3

Yeah that’s true
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 04:06 PM
1

Hence why it’s ruined. Then regular guys get stuck with this: https://youtube.com/shorts/CEIy5PLcecg?si=0dRZFEQD0Iv_gJdK
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 03:23 PM
3

💯 agree!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 03:22 PM
5

Body fat percentage then probably best
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 03:21 PM
2

They should rate everyone’s looks using an AI. Results should follow a normal distribution of its accurate! You can match +-1pt so 3s aren’t trying to get with 8s
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:41 PM
1

For short term hookup and ghosting yes!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:39 PM
4

99% of the girls are not out of the guys league! Often the girls are below them in every way (looks, income etc)…it’s just that the girls don’t understand their actual level!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:39 PM
2

But Chad-Rone the convict can’t or won’t pay! They need Bob for revenue!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:37 PM
6

Weight?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:31 PM
3

Best way to improve dating sites, get an AI to objectively rate everyone’s looks from a 3-9 scale. Looks would be based on face, body fat and height. An overall score then derived with the majority falling into the average range, similar to a normal distribution. Then you should only be shown matches either at your overall level or +-1pt. This will give women an accurate view of their physical attraction which has become distorted due to social media gasing/simping. This approach would result in…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 02:28 PM
1

Or just go 50:50 or spend the cash on hookers.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 09:40 PM
1

Wow that’s false in every way! It’s more like the bottom 3% as the actual top 3% are probably married!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 09:33 PM
1

I think for hookups, one’s money has zero input! That’s only for Beta Buxxing! Women know they can sleep up out of their own looks league so looks are the only factor with the exception of those with really high status. The pp size thing won’t be known so I don’t think that has much emphasis initially unless it’s for a repeat.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 11:21 AM
3

Ok well maybe not happy per se but content with sharing
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 08:19 PM
6

All your sources point at the same Substack that have taken dubious studies to deduct many incorrect outcomes (Height for example is clearly wrong! It’s the equivalent of telling people that all water is poisonous and pointing to some study which showed the tested water is poisonous). Example: your study states that the 5’2 gnome had 4 less partners than the 6’2 quarterback. Were all the gnome’s partners sex workers? How attractive were they? Was he attracted to them or barrel scrapping? Short k…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 06:21 PM
3

The Chads I know are hitting 40 and still consider themselves single (some have live in girlfriends) but many have let themselves go and do have the same optionally they had in their 20s. Chad does not do well as he ages
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 06:17 PM
5

Situationships! Many women in these think they’re in a relationship, others are seeking the commitment hoping he’ll change his mind while Chad considers himself single and has multiple women on the go!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 02:23 PM
1

Ok simple question then: if the apps are great for women, why do more women not use them? The vast vast majority don’t!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 10:48 AM
2

Sub 5 men get driven away but not sub 5 women. So those sub 5 women match with guys above them and so on and so on. This is mainly due to the huge numbers mismatch (way more guys on apps). The women though will rarely get commitment from a guy well above her but will very easily get sex. This is the main complaint as to why so few women use the apps in the first place. Constantly getting pumped and dumped by hotter guys and not getting commitment is why many women gave up! It’s back to my origin…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 10:28 AM
6

Most of what you wrote is true! Men are not meeting women’s higher expectations these days and the few that are, women are happy to share: the most attractive guys through situationships the rich providers with multiple girls
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 10:17 AM
14

Women are happy to share! Historically this has always been true. It seems to be more natural for 4 women to share a guy better than themselves rather than exclusively date a guy on their level. Aka Chad wins!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 10:15 AM
1

Yeah commercial interest always comes first
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 10:10 AM
1

But those men by definition are getting a raw deal as they’re (the top guys) not getting the top females. Plus many women complain of being pumped and dumped, most likely due to matching up looks wise. FYI - happy for you personally that you got a serious relationship and not a situationship
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 10:09 AM
5

Exactly!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 02:40 AM
-1

Great points!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 07:51 PM
-1

That’s probably true alright!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 05:55 PM
11

He probably has a few average chicks for a slow Tuesday that he can “DTF” text…they probably consider themselves in relationships while he considers himself single
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 05:54 PM
10

The art of monkey branching
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 05:17 PM
2

They don’t really! Overloaded in life in general If they use ones it would be the elite/gold digger ones
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 05:16 PM
3

Fair point!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 05:16 PM
8

Stats disagree! It’s 5% nowadays
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 05:15 PM
14

Yeah sharing is extremely common, something the media never seems to acknowledge despite it being the only obvious answer 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 05:14 PM
2

Good to hear some success stories
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 03:16 PM
11

Both genders have priced themselves out of the market! Women more so due to social media gasing/simping etc
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 03:00 PM
12

Is it? If so, why are so few women on the apps?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 03:00 PM
1

Well I think it’s naive to discount the agenda of the company controlling everything about the platform but I’m happy for you having success!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 02:59 PM
4

In general women do have the same tastes, the same group of Chads gets all the matches. The distribution of that 5% is heavily concentrated. It’s not to say that all swipes will match that Chad group but they do get the majority!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 02:58 PM
0

Good points!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 02:54 PM
3

True and a disaster really! Will accelerate the fertility decline as unrealistic standards and expectations will not be met.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 02:52 PM
12

Date shows women only swipe on 5% of male profiles (The Chads) while men swipe on the top 53% of female profiles (average and above).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 02:32 PM
3

I think they’re just more male dominated
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 02:30 PM
32

Juice ain’t worth the squeeze it seems
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 02:30 PM
7

Aren’t they all male dominated though?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 01:24 PM
7

Best outcome for a child is to be raised in the same house by both parents! Worst outcome is to be raised by single mother…data supports this. The misandrist family law system doesn’t give fathers equal rights so leaving is generally a terrible outcome for the children!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 12:16 AM
12

Duty & commitment to children
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 12:13 AM
0

There is NO WAY ran through is going celibate
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 07:09 PM
2

Avoiding this: https://youtube.com/shorts/CEIy5PLcecg?si=-osrl3o4sTu6V36F
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:43 PM
1

Not nowadays, back in the day yeah! I will say the most promiscuous ones didn’t have too high standards
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 03:48 PM
1

Sure 🙄, I’m sure you had no interest in all those way better looking Chads that ghosted you…come on, nobody believes that! It’s like saying I won the lottery but I didn’t want to collect the winnings.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 07:45 AM
9

Sad the way the world is going!
/r/MensRights28/11/24 04:30 PM
1

Most out of her league, sleeping down, don’t pretend it’s the ugly guys that get the casual sex! Maybe she didn’t want 100% but given women’s primary complaint is lack of commitment (which is always from guys better looking) I’d assume she was interested in a large percentage of those guys but they pumped/dumped/ghosted her.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 04:23 PM
1

Yeah but the men that are made wait believe (correctly) they’ve come DEAD LAST and lost in every way! The previous 50 guys she banged didn’t want to commit so imagine how number 51 (the relationship guy) feels. Women like to spin this delusional cope that they had no long term interest in the guy they hooked up with and it wasn’t anything serious but this is totally delusional! That guy was often way out of their league and they pined for him! Even if he was also shit in bed. A good instagram ph…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 03:18 PM
2

The Chads treat those women terrible while they treat their beta provider SIMPS worse! So definitely more intimated by a Chad but care more if the Beta Provider loses interest as greater financial cost.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 02:57 PM
1

Because many women marry for resources not attraction! These marriages have very high chance of divorce, usually initiated by the woman after she’s got the kids/house. Also much higher cheating risk if she ran AF/BB. I mean if guys casually slept up and dated on their level (basically what women can do) then the girl he’s in a relationship is going to be insecure he will cheat with the hot girls way out of his league and way better looking than her!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 08:33 AM
-1

I think the level of attraction is left out here! The casual dudes are likely way better looking than the relationship dudes and the girl herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 08:29 AM
2

AF/BB dual mating strategies are run by many women! However, the AF is usually not that good in bed as he’s selfish, due to being way better looking than the girl he’s hooking up with (men sleep down casually). This is the reason for the orgasm gap and why women have better sex in relationships. Not all women run these strategies but if you are pegged as a relationship guy that’s made to wait while loads of Chads out of her league got it fast with little to no effort, run my man!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 08:20 AM
9

Yeah it’s a good point and probably why women are frustrated at the men in these events. These mid women are likely ran through, 30+ with baggage but still dream of 6ft+ Chad riding in on horseback with a 250k job ready to wife them up…pure fantasy! They’re probably meeting their looks-match at these events which doesn’t interest them unless he’s the ultimate provider and willing to overlook their questionable past.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 10:15 PM
12

While the remainder of the guys will get bitter comments that Chad either hasn’t shown up or hasn’t taken their number.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 05:13 PM
25

Because they still want the Chad way out of their league and are generally disappointed he didn’t show up
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 02:33 PM
-1

Too much choice from the massive numbers mismatch is one of the issues! Women swipe well out of their league then get pumped and dumped by those guys and often rinse and repeat. When’s she finally realises the guys way hotter than her won’t commit, she may swipe on a guy on her level for a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 10:51 PM
0

😂
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 08:48 PM
-1

Exactly! It should really be always called “Red Pill Awareness”
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 05:42 PM
-5

Blue pill = I have no standards and will take anything I can get! (Promiscuous single mother with multiple kids from multiple baby daddies, drowning in debt, overweight etc)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 04:54 PM
–

Women generally just get casual sex from Chad so I don’t see a major difference as what they want from him (commitment, emotional connection etc) they don’t get anyway! Plus a few instagram photos they could get throw in
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 04:24 PM
–

On the flip side, women could get a Chad bot, way out of their league that will actually commit to them!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 03:14 PM
1

It’s just sad this sub only has 5% of TwoXChromosomes. Men need to shout louder about their issues
/r/MensRights26/11/24 03:12 PM
9

14 MILLION toxic misandrists that identify as “feminists” over on TwoXChromosomes proves it’s not bullshit. You definitely can’t disagree that dating apps ruined dating!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 03:28 PM
16

I would say feminism’s quest for supremacy plus dating apps ruined dating and red pill was the natural reaction!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 03:00 PM
7

Try post it on twoX and see what feminists really think
/r/MensRights22/11/24 02:02 PM
–

Nope! Completely false, no average modern woman in 2024 is looking for her looksmatch!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 01:44 PM
8

Just proves females are far worse at rating male attractiveness! If they were any good, they’d rate men closer to a normal distribution…no news here
/r/MensRights21/11/24 10:21 PM
1

But in many countries you are defacto married if you live together. Where I live has common law marriage so it was more or less the same. Also I would never live with a gf unless there was marriage/kids plan.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 05:41 PM
0

Will only date down if the guys is significantly better looking! Agreed rates are far too high. As I said, without kids you’d be crazy unless she was rich.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 02:10 PM
10

Mainly because of kids! The best outcome for a child is for both parents to live together! I’m happily married to a great woman and mother but if I didn’t want kids no way I’d get married. The alimony thing is exaggerated as it’s only paid in 10% of cases. If you have a prenup they are very rarely thrown out. If your country doesn’t recognise prenups and you are a significantly higher earner/wealthy you should in general avoid marriage. Men should be willing to entertain marriage also if the wom…
/r/MensRights21/11/24 11:26 AM
–

I think what you are really saying is that women don’t desire men on their level, only those above them! This is why Polygyny is the future where the smaller subset of men are shared among multiple women. It’s dating apps playing out in real life. As these few men will have all options and power, they will be able to make whatever demands they want. They’ll demand multiple wives or even ask those wives to provide for him. Women would prefer to share it seems than date on their level! It’s also p…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 08:48 AM
1

There is no other rational explanation for the large disparity! Standard feminist that can’t understand logical reasoning
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 06:28 PM
1

Logical reasoning!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 05:32 PM
2

But many women in situationships are just seeing the one guy (especially if he’s well out of her league) while he’s seeing multiple. The girl hopes for commitment from the guy she’s sharing
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 05:32 PM
1

Well that’s another valid reason why the sharing (as you’ve experienced first hand) happens
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 10:34 AM
1

Your experience is an outlier! It’s not like men don’t love women in their 30s, most do! It’s they prefer those in their 20s
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 10:34 AM
5

Only explanation for why 63% of young men are single and only 34% of young women are…they’re sharing! There is no other plausible explanation! The number of gay couples does not account for the difference nor does women dating older guys as female general preferences is to date close to their age. The funny part is the young Chad that has 5 women on the go considers himself single while his 5 spinning plates consider themselves in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 10:28 AM
1

Situationships
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 10:25 AM
6

Women are more willing to share men (knowingly or unknowingly) therefore it’s harder
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 08:00 PM
1

No! It’s saying if someone behaves a certain way then there are likely outcomes: example, promiscuous past = higher cheating risk! Couldn’t maintain a relationship longer than 3 months = likely narcissist and lacks sufficient social skills for a serious relationship. It’s not saying AWALT, it’s just to tell men to open their eyes to dangers and pitfalls that could ruin them!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 05:16 PM
–

This sounds like toxic feminism preaching!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 09:10 AM
2

I don’t agree! There is no hate, just self respect and awareness of female nature. This is very important for average guys that jump eyes closed into the first woman that looks at them. I do agree there is a group of grifters that have been hurt and are angry by their experiences but NAMALT!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 08:27 AM
2

I think men place more value on the merchandise than on the merchant selling it though. That cross is closer to mid 20s than 30.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 11:40 PM
-4

This is not normal! Female highest value in the sexual marketplace is in her 20s. Now you might be open to more possibilities, you might have learned from the Chad baggage but you will not be desirable for a successful guy in his 30s. He will feel you should have got with him in his 20s or not at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 09:55 PM
1

Exactly!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 09:52 PM
-1

Most red pill don’t see their wives this way! If they meet young and get married young (20s or early 30s) if together a couple of years it’s different. That’s a person you are on a journey to build a life with. What red pilled guys or any guys don’t want is a woman that got ran through by dozens of guys way out of her league as she’ll high cheating risk, she’ll feel she’s settling (even though the guy could be her looks match) and will have tonnes of baggage from the bad Chad treatment.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 09:51 PM
-1

Hey! Don’t be using logic here!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 08:43 PM
-5

Basically because no man with any self respect will wife them up or give them children. They’ll at best end up pregnant with Chad’s bastard who will bail the second he finds out about the pregnancy. Wouldn’t it be smarter to find a husband on your level that actually appreciates you as more than a hole to build a family with?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 08:40 PM
1

PUA is total garbage and doesn’t work at all these days. Your looks are number one, followed by height 2. Only if you meet the barrier in these areas will you be considered and having some game can help a little then. But average looking guy is getting anywhere with PUA.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 12:33 AM
0

That’s just cope and pure nonsense! The difference is the hookup guy was much more attractive than her (as men sleep down) and the relationship guy was the one she settled for! She would have happily married the hookup guy in most cases therefore the relationship guy came last!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 02:21 PM
8

But they’ll only get pumped & dumped from guys they match with (out of their league) so if they desire a relationship they’ll need to meet a looksmatch especially if they themselves are average. Also the majority of women do not use dating apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 03:45 PM
-1

Hoes (party girls) are the best fun! Just treat them appropriately as casual fun and don’t consider anything serious ever and it will enhance your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 11:02 AM
–

The Hoes (most modern women) are so mesmerised by the Chads way out of their league, they won’t be able to last a day without getting pumped and dumped. No way this lasts! It literally changes nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 08:37 PM
6

The Hoes won’t be able to resist the Chad way out their league! Never gonna last
/r/MensRights12/11/24 08:35 PM
7

Probably the stress/trauma from the misandrist divorce machine
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 07:36 PM
15

Most open feminists have been ran through so they’re basically the same person! They’d only make it into the fuck zone but it would be really difficult for them to get into the LTR zone. The high body count can’t be undone so that’s a no forever but the feminist could change her beliefs or become less radical.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 11:16 PM
7

No way they’ll be able to resist the Chads out of their league…they’ll be getting ready for the anticipated booty call soon and then complaining that men have commitment issues
/r/MensRights06/11/24 01:26 PM
2

14 million misandrists that identify as feminists…I think that shows what feminists really are these days!
/r/MensRights06/11/24 01:25 PM
2

Someone being a murderer is not got to do with the Red Pill! It may have caused arguments as any philosophy or political orientation may but would never encourage violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 11:31 AM
3

Your comments above are exactly why the red pill has been created! Sad really
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 05:10 PM
–

Yeah fair point! Dates as in taken out then smashed after and ghosted is prevalent. I was trying to highlight that there is never commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 04:49 PM
–

Women sleep out of their league, I wouldn’t say date. Going to a bar and getting smashed by a Chad way out of your league isn’t dating to me. A relationship is. The only loophole I can see for women running dual mating strategies (AF/BB)(not all women do this though) is that they can conceal their body counts and trick/gaslight you into thinking they’re special to the average SIMP that comes along after!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 02:35 PM
4

Of course it’s possible! But magically expecting it to fall into place is wishful thinking at best! Planning is important and given women’s decreased fertility window relative to men, they shouldn’t leave it too late
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 02:17 PM
0

Neither
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 08:29 PM
1

Please read! Question was to previous commentator!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 07:56 PM
4

Well of course if you are a top 1% Chad and shame them then they won’t put out. My point is for 95% of guys they don’t even get the opportunity.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 07:22 PM
4

That has zero to do with having to put in zero effort for casual sex. This isn’t applicable to 99% of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 06:34 PM
3

Top 1% Chad?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 05:50 PM
9

You need to be 9 (top 5-10%) to get it without work! Below that, even top 20% you still have to work & manipulate for casual.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 12:27 PM
22

“I don’t work for you anymore!” I’d only help in a severe emergency if she was the mother of my kids. That’s it
/r/MensRights02/11/24 11:02 PM
3

The beta orbiter was done a favour by her!
/r/MensRights02/11/24 08:53 AM
1

I think for getting a girlfriend yes that’s true but for casual hookups or genuine attraction no
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 03:52 PM
2

I think social status does not matter for the top 20%, attractiveness alone unless that status is incredibly high (1/100,000)
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/24 03:47 PM
2

Men are valued for what they accomplish not the number of women they ran through! I know guys with that would hit anything and have high body counts but nobody would admire them! For most the juice isn’t worth the squeeze and that guy hasn’t achieved anything!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/24 09:36 PM
-2

Orgasm gap means women have less orgasms than men. I agree it’s primarily for biological reasons but I also agree with the author that it’s also because of women’s choices, aka choosing to sleep with a Chad casually where you won’t cum vs a relationship with a guy that makes an effort and you’ll come more often.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 11:22 PM
-1

I don’t see how that negates my argument? The men cum always regardless of the girl but the girl only cums with a guy that makes effort. The closer the guy is in looks to the girl, the more effort he is likely to put in…as he wants to keep her. The Chad (way out of the girls looks league) will only be interested in satisfying himself! Since the Chad gets most of the casual sex, the girls don’t get many orgasms.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 11:05 PM
-15

Women getting ran through by Chads way out of their league who don’t care about being good in bed or satisfying the girl (as she is so far beneath his looks level) is the primary reason for the orgasm gap! If a girl chose a guy on her level for a relationship, she’s far more likely to have better sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 05:05 PM
15

Standard toxic feminism! The MAIN CAUSE of the fertility crisis is feminism! That coupled with social media, hypergamy and ridiculous requirements that don’t match what the woman offers is why there is a fertility crisis. The housing crisis is another contributor.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 02:21 PM
2

Society doesn’t believe that! Women can be choosy but if they are too choosy, they’ll end up with guys out of their league that will just pump and dump them at best. They’ll never find committed relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 06:34 AM
-1

Good for you! Hope it all works out!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 10:12 PM
-6

You’ll just have to monkey branch
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 09:58 PM
2

Difference is most average women have access but more average men don’t
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 02:23 PM
2

Nothing: the problem will correct itself! Men: can’t act like their grandfathers and expect to get a woman. More is required especially if the woman works. More required socially and emotionally. Women: delusional standards will equate to single and childless while occasionally getting pumped and dumped by a guy way out of their league from the apps. Both genders will end up lonely as a result! Loneliness is worse for men but it’s also bad for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 07:37 AM
1

You sound like the dream wife! Low n-count, low cheating risk, high sex drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 01:11 PM
1

It’s a strange one! I’ve a friend that was a Chad (he got fat and lost it) in his 20s and he treated women terribly! I always wondered why given they basically gave him everything he wanted with little to no effort on his part. It probably made him a narcissist!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 03:48 PM
284

Standard feminism: men are oppressors but also our slaves. Just depends on how I’m feeling.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 11:35 AM
0

Men do run AF/BB, commonly referred to Madona/Whore complex. The difference is that a woman past behaviour determines where she falls. However for a man, it’s just his level of physical attractiveness that determines it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:21 AM
4

Through beta buxxing! Weeks of wining & dining, with no sex until he’s “proved” himself. The sad part is some of the Hoes will bang Chad after the guy has dropped her home. Then Chad pops over to get all the benefits.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:20 AM
10

Yet these women still chase Chads way out of their league that will treat them this way over and over and over!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 08:17 AM
-2

They’re probably honest that it hasn’t dropped for Chad but only for Chad!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 07:24 AM
8

Feminism! It’s basically created a generation of undateable modern women with delusional expectations, high body counts, low morality and high levels of narcissism! What guy in his right mind would want to commit to that? Easier to just keep it physical/casual. Men generally want traditional, submissive, feminine women that complement their lives while they can be a good man that’s respected to their girlfriends/wives. These traditional women are increasingly hard to find, hence we ends up with …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 10:12 PM
2

Most women aren’t getting plowed by a train of Chads way out their league though. Most go for relationships! I understand some guys can be very manipulative and ghost after sex. To be clear by Hoe I mean multiple ONS, FWB etc, which will only make that woman a terrible LTR partner for someone on her looks level (as she feels she’s somehow settling for her looksmatch) and a very high cheating risk. We don’t know the true stats on paternity fraud but it clearly exists but I’d agree it’s less than …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 08:30 PM
9

A far worse deal if she got ran though by Chads with little to no effort and treated them way better than the Beta SIMP provider got! The Beta SIMP provider gets the benefit of sexless marriage, divorce rape and potentially unwillingly raising Chad’s bastard! That is only of course if you marry a Hoe that runs dual mating strategies (AF/BB).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 02:40 PM
2

Of course! It’s because of SIMPS! The SIMPS will accept any past behaviour, high cheating risk etc as they are so desperate and thirsty! If men as a whole didn’t accept women getting ran through by Chads way out of their league, then running dual mating strategies when they hit 30, women wouldn’t behave this way!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 02:36 PM
1

Women have high standards and historically always had! Most men didn’t reproduce in the past. This was a necessary feature for survival of the fittest which is in the best interest of the human species. Now some women, especially nowadays, have delusional standards nowadays thanks to feminism, SIMP culture, online validation which is totally disingenuous. However, the real world will always rip this facade away for the majority of those women. I deserve a 9/10 looking guy, 6ft+ making 100k+ whil…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 10:31 PM
1

So what you are saying is if you are rich then getting the hot ones is far better and cheaper than a gold digger that takes half your wealth? Cost seems excessive too, I doubt it’s that high
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 09:28 PM
3

Looks are the main thing that matter for genuine attraction! That’s why the Chad’s job doesn’t matter! It only matters for gold diggers, beta buxx etc FYI - I’m surprised you disclosed what you earn!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 08:22 AM
2

Guys only want single moms for casual sex, especially nowadays! Unless she’s really hot, most guys don’t want to raise another man’s child. Women, especially those in their 30s will feel the same way! They want to have their own kids, not raise someone else’s. A girl in her 20s mightn’t be thinking about having her own kids yet while a woman in her 40s, post wall will understand that the most guys her age either have kids or will never have them so are probably more realistic with their expectat…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 07:53 AM
8

Accountability is just accepting the choices you have made and that by making those choices you might likely be less attractive to the opposite sex! If a guy loves pizza and is 5 stone overweight, he generally accepts accountability for his choice of overeating unhealthy food and that it makes him less attractive. He doesn’t going around calling women femcels because he doesn’t meet their preferences/standards!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 04:09 PM
4

Agreed! Just pointing out that female standards are higher and sometimes out of one’s control
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 04:06 PM
50

No no no! How dare you talk about accountability? You must be an INCEL for not agreeing with the misandrist feminist supremacist ideology!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 02:41 PM
14

It’s like saying for men: 1) don’t be short 2) don’t be fat 3) don’t be broke Not all men can conform, especially to the first one as it’s beyond their control but it does make them less attractive to women! No point in crying about it
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 02:38 PM
19

Incel = shaming word used by toxic misandrists for anyone that disagrees with their narrative
/r/MensRights08/10/24 04:42 PM
8

Conscription? The Government’s right to send a man to his death
/r/MensRights08/10/24 07:42 AM
6

That’s like the saying Judaism benefits Palestinians!
/r/MensRights28/09/24 10:22 PM
1

Only SIMPS are consuming it!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 09:35 PM
3

The original movement and quest for equality yes, beneficial! The modern supremacist man hating movement, no!
/r/MensRights24/09/24 05:35 PM
17

That’s because it goes against their supremacist agenda!
/r/MensRights24/09/24 05:26 PM
1

Hypergamy is non-negotiable
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/24 07:29 AM
3

Men pay in the hopes of getting sex. A man would rarely pay for a female friend and in general wouldn’t bother going for dinner with her vs going for dinner with the guys
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 03:00 PM
4

He’s moved a little more towards redpill but being a natural Chad will always had lead him to believe the blue pill Disney fantasies are true: they’re only true for Chads like him!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 01:39 PM
19

Very “Experienced women” are generally for fun only!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 08:15 AM
1

It would probably damage the relationship so no
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 05:26 PM
10

That would go against the feminist SUPREMACIST cult
/r/MensRights10/09/24 04:35 PM
–

Nope! Women are still hypergamous! You don’t see guys going around with minimum income requirements for girls etc Modern women want men to be traditional without being traditional themselves!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 03:39 PM
8

Is anyone taking that (feminism) seriously nowadays? They’ve outed themselves as hypocrites who are really just supremacists
/r/MensRights05/09/24 07:10 AM
2

Those guys either are experimenting with some MILF fantasies or they can’t get younger girls and are picking the low lying fruit! It doesn’t last. It’s delusional to believe late thirties and early forties can hold the same standard as early 20s! Women are delusional enough in the dating market as it is which doesn’t serve them: please don’t add fuel to the fire. FYI women of any age will always have a myriad of options for casual sex but not for the relationship they generally seek.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 10:10 PM
12

Then they wonder why getting ran through isn’t seen as an attractive quality to their beta provider SIMP
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/09/24 07:30 PM
2

This is totally false! The redpill mindset will shrink a man’s dating pool but it will shrink it for the better! It will exclude all the toxic feminist supremacists, all the hoes (unless we want short term fun) and reduce the risk of cheating/infidelity/unhappiness. It’s definitely harder to find quality women but you generally end up better off unless you had very few options to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 07:15 PM
1

Feminists supremacist nonsense at work! Incel = anyone that disagrees with my supremacist opinion
/r/MensRights02/09/24 07:21 AM
8

If you are rich why on earth would you ever get married?
/r/MensRights31/08/24 02:56 PM
5

“Insecure” is just a feminist supremacist shaming word! It’s basically bullshit that derives from the lack of accountability over past choices! Banks run credit HISTORY checks, states keep criminal HISTORY because they know PAST BEHAVIOUR IS THE BEST PREDICTOR OF FUTURE BEHAVIOUR! But the feminist supremacists think for some reason past sexual history is no predictor of future behaviour! The cognitive dissonance is laughable. The man is just protecting himself by lowering the risk of cheating/di…
/r/MensRights31/08/24 01:32 PM
1

Older men have an incentive to improve for YOUNGER women
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 01:29 PM
–

Strongly agree! Dead beats should be made look after their seed
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 07:09 PM
–

Mandatory paternity testing should be a fundamental human right! Any father or mother should know if a baby is his/hers with 99.9% certainty! Anyone disagreeing against this is just a cheating Hoe!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 07:08 PM
3

But would not things like high body counts influence your “trust”?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 07:03 PM
4

But the fear you mentioned will ALWAYS come through then! You’ll be hot enough to bang but not date
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/24 05:41 PM
2

But the guys girls actually approach are usually top 1% way out of their league guys that will only bang and never commit
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/24 02:34 PM
34

Illegal = Invaders Legal = Welcome if productive to society
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 04:47 PM
3

First wave feminism: seeking equality, not getting cat called, protection etc…all noble goals Modern feminism: Toxic misandrist supremacist movement that seeks the subjugation of men.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 11:53 AM
1

I honestly dunno 🤷‍♂️ how anyone could believe the Disney fairytale blue advice in this day and age! You’d have to be incredibly Naive to be blue pilled. All it will get you is SIMP/Beta Orbitor status and if you are lucky you will get a wife that will cheat/Divorce Grape you
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 08:10 PM
5

😂😂😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 08:05 PM
4

MeToo
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 08:04 PM
1

That’s very naive! If that was true then EVERYONE in low paid jobs would do the same
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 01:31 PM
3

The majority of female wealth comes from divorce and inheritance. Take the divorce away they become significantly poorer. Men with low sex drive not gonna sign the business contract
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 12:21 PM
1

Given their “skill set”, these jobs would be low paying and keep them in poverty!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 12:20 PM
1

Women would be dirt poor, massive population decrease
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 09:41 AM
1

Men want Hoes for fun/casual and low body count women with self respect for LTR/Marriage. The makeup thing I don’t agree with as nearly all women wear it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 06:26 PM
19

“Redpill men typically say that they only date women under 25” Then most of those men would be forever single!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 07:31 AM
6

I secretly pine for you as you are way way out of my league is the real answer
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 06:08 PM
4

💯 spot on
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 06:07 PM
7

Only solipsistic women and white knights are really disagreeing! Even the clued in women are saying it was a stupid thing to say
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 02:19 PM
5

If she didn’t mean exactly what I stated above she’d have said as much! There is no ambiguity here! Everything I’ve said it 100% true
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 02:18 PM
6

No it’s says quite a bit about what she MEANT by what she said! There is no ambiguity here! None!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 02:17 PM
12

No that’s completely false! And total gaslighting! She’s saying “you’re not attractive enough for me to hookup with or be an FWB but because you have other qualities (like a large wallet) I’ll accept your subpar looks for a relationship” To be clear, women don’t state those exact words due to virtu signalling but the meaning was obvious to anyone that has any life experience at all! It’s similar to “I see you as a friend” which really means “I don’t find you attractive and wouldn’t ever consider…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 02:03 PM
3

Wrong!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 11:32 AM
–

No!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 10:26 AM
9

She’s not literally saying it word for word but every single guy interprets (correctly) what her words really mean
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 10:03 AM
8

Maybe for you but the vast majority of men in the top 10% of attractiveness who get the majority of casual sex are the ones that don’t commit when the girls seek it. Some don’t ask as they know he won’t give it but often pine for it!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 10:02 AM
6

Guys mostly sleep way down! All the best looking guys I know that hooked up a lot slept with girls well below their looks level, usually drunk. These guys had girls chase them for commitment but they never gave it. It’s simple mathematics really: when a small group seek one thing with a large group, they have lots of options, so will be most selective etc
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 08:52 AM
6

Because the majority of women don’t seek casual sex so the few that do have a myriad of options and usually sleep with guys way out their looks league! Aka plain Jane (average, 50%er) sleeping with a top 5% Chad and would LOVE to be in a relationship with him. He will never commit due to his options and the fact she’s not on his looks level. This is the big issue! She’s saying to the guy (husband material) “the really hot guy way out of my league wouldn’t commit (even though I’d have loved him t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 08:49 AM
3

😂😂😂 so true! How dare you hold me accountable for my choices? How dare you have standards/preferences!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 08:39 AM
12

Simple! Women would happily date their FWBs/ONs and it’s usually because the guy is way out of their league and sleeping down! They don’t date as the guy won’t commit, that the only reason generally!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 08:38 AM
23

But would a woman not find it very insulting to be told “I see you as good for sex only!”…I don’t think most men would have the same cognitive dissonance women have and could clearly see that’s insulting to the woman
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 08:34 AM
10

The cognitive dissonance here is amazing
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 08:32 AM
7

Yes but most girls do not feel that way about the guys they hookup with! They’d happily be in a relationship with them especially as those guys are usually way out of their league! But the guys will not date down, even if they’ll happily sleep down
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 08:29 AM
10

No one seems to be commenting on the obvious: if she’s into Hookups/FWB/ONS, she’s a hoe and SHE’s NOT RELATIONSHIP MATERIAL!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 08:28 AM
1

I just whip it out and say “are you blind?”
/r/MensRights09/08/24 02:16 PM
–

Single moms in general ain’t getting married! They’re just going from guy 🏧 to guy 🏧 until he moves on. Average guys have better options for LTRs, not for casual though
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 09:41 AM
-3

Considering only 5% of modern western women are marriage material I’d say the bar is in the sky! It used to be easy for most women to meet the criteria and they’re not really stringent criteria but modern feminism has ruined marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 07:30 AM
1

Chad lite is a top 10%, Chad is a top 1%. Using 3-8 scale, Chad lite is a 7, Chad 8, normal is 4-6. Chad lites wouldn’t go near a single mom, not to mind marriage. Only a 3/4 would that had no better options. You’d want to be in the bottom 25% of men to consider a single mom for marriage especially if you’ve no kids yourself! Unless she was super hot
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 07:25 AM
1

Yes true, BUT most men don’t get to practice this! Most men will only get sex in LTRs and very little to no casual. They won’t wife up a ran through woman either and while they may try dual mating strategy it’s not an option for most men. For ALL women, it’s an option
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 08:59 PM
1

I don’t really agree with that as men generally have to sleep down significantly to get casual! Therefore a girl on their looks level is far better than the land whale that is for casual. A guy will never pine for the land whale he brought home from the club on a Saturday night drunk and won’t realistically cheat with a land whale if he’s in a relationship with a looksmatch. So it’s definitely different for men and women! However, if a woman (who sleeps up) is getting casual from a guy way out o…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 08:01 PM
2

💯 they can’t deal with the truth/reality!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 03:55 PM
17

I think anyone that uses the word insecurity/insecurities shouldn’t be taken seriously! It’s just a shaming word for the woke Brigade
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 07:39 AM
-1

Yeah it’s all the bitter washed up feminists trying to point and sputter! The guys they’re trying to shame are winners, they see themselves as winners and have zero respect for the purple haired bitter feminist with the horde of cats 🐈 I would argue that the SIMPs trying to endear themselves to those feminists are actually worse! They really are scum and bitter jealous losers!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 08:53 PM
4

No not early! But not wait forever. If she slept after 5 dates and only in a relationship I think most guys would be ok with that for a good catch! As long as her history is consistent and she’s not running dual mating strategies: AF/BB
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 08:52 PM
5

Women always spill the beans eventually! You definitely won’t know early on but that’s why you have a long vetting period especially for marriage! Minimum 2yrs. The girl needs to be genuinely into him, not pining for some Chad way way way out of her league that pipped her down on a Tuesday and will never commit or dare to be seen in public with her. Hence the importance of low body count and no casual history.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 08:50 PM
5

Yeah fair point! I think if the girl was only having sex in LTRs and had no casual history the guy is likely to be ok waiting longer…as long as she’s not running AF/BB
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 05:20 PM
11

Red pill do not dismiss women that sleep after 3 dates as long as she’s low body count and careful who she gave it to. If there is genuine burning desire there + low body count then the red pill are happy. What they want to avoid is a promiscuous woman running dual matting strategies (AF/BB) where one guy has to wait months while Chad got it day 1 with no effort. Also to avoid women sleeping with multiple guys and pining for a different guy. Prime example below: https://www.independent.ie/style/…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/24 05:07 PM
3

Men have always been disposable! Look at every war fought ever
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 11:21 PM
1

They’re definitely not going to Chad lite as a single mom! Plus they never dated Chad, they were just Tuesday night fun! One of many in rotation. Edit: if she’s good looking she might still get pipped down by Chad lite on a Tuesday but she’s never getting commitment!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 09:31 PM
–

To summarise: SIMPs have ruined dating
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 07:03 PM
1

Agreed, most couples are looks matched and meet early. However, Debra doesn’t realise her looks have faded as she left it too late, has little to offer now and won’t get commitment from a looksmatch. If she’s a single mom then she’d have to date down considerably
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 10:30 AM
7

Ok Cupid
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 09:02 PM
3

Okcupid data
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 09:02 PM
61

<image> I think this best explains it: in your early 20s you were well below most women and now in your 30s you are above after your “glow up” therefore your standards rise while washed up Debra must lower hers or be left with cats. I think most guys would look upon 30s washed up Debra and think “how delusional, she seriously thinks I’ll take her seriously” It’s rare someone from your college days will come out of the woodwork so this is just a fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 02:53 PM
-5

You’re clearly a complete idiot that can’t debate!
/r/MarriedRedPill02/08/24 02:00 PM
1

It’s not a dumbass comment! It’s like saying if you didn’t drive down the road at 200kph you wouldn’t have crashed! If you put something at risk, you can’t be surprised if an accident happens! Now maybe the OP was going to get cheated on or maybe if he controlled the Frame it wouldn’t have happened. I don’t think it worked out best for his kids.
/r/MarriedRedPill02/08/24 08:04 AM
9

As long as she doesn’t get huge, still gets along with him there will be no issues. Everyone gets old and I’m sure the wife might check out some hot young guy too. This is normal as long as you don’t act on it! Everybody has fantasies.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 08:00 AM
2

Great post OP! And good advice for men to set boundaries! I’m sure if you had curbed your wife’s behaviour easily she wouldn’t have cheated or even had the opportunity. Her going out alone, getting drunk was putting the relationship at risk. It’s also highly likely she cheated more than once and with more than one guy. She was really just looking for male attention and validation.
/r/MarriedRedPill01/08/24 04:05 PM
2

I think the real world hits men much harder for many reasons and hence they know the love fairytale of the Disney movies ain’t gonna happen for almost everybody! Women on the other hand, can be delusional with all the false undeserved validation they get from SIMPS and their girlfriends and often price themselves out of the dating market. This delusional can continue with the expectation of finding true love. Whereas for men, the reality is “this girl is good enough”
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 02:41 PM
4

Yeah that’s true! Women do need more emotional support than men do
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 02:32 PM
0

That mainly due to the fact that the heavily Misandrist family law system in the West encourages women to divorce and screws men for getting divorced. Men in the West have the same rights in family law as Jews had in 1930s Germany or Palestinians have in Modern day Israel.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 02:18 PM
9

Both men and women settle! The difference is that men aren’t sleeping with women casually that are WAY WAY out of their League. If they have any casual, they’re sleeping down significantly. Whereas some women (those that seek casual) are sleeping with guys WAY WAY out of their league who naturally won’t commit to someone so far below their level. Therefore when the woman finds a guy that will commit, he’s usually looks matched with her and she feels she’s settling, hence the lack of interest in …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 02:15 PM
–

RP Men despise the dual mating strategist manipulators! Those that pretend to be “good girls” and lie about having a low body count to manipulate the man into a relationship with a Hoe! She makes the guy wait months for sex, must commit etc while multiple Chads (way out of her league) got to sleep with her first day. Then when he inevitably finds out she tries to gaslight him as if it’s somehow his issue! She’s shocked when he naturally dumps her ass back on the streets after she wasted months a…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 10:21 AM
2

I think the whole dynamic comes down to men wanting sex more and therefore have a stronger desire first women than vice versa
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 07:48 AM
–

The majority of women are looking for relationships not casual! Therefore it simple to reason that the hottest women are more likely to get what they want and not get strung along in situationships etc Of course there are some that sleep around a lot too no doubt but overall getting what they want usually leads to lower body count
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 07:29 AM
1

Yeah the difference is only slight. It appears to be the woman, generally though through make up
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 04:35 PM
1

In the REAL WORLD most people are average looking and the vast majority of couples are closely looksmatched! Walk down any street in any developed country and you’ll see this. It’s not perfectly 50:50, you’ll get 5s with 6s & 4s but you won’t see 3s going around with 9s much unless there’s cash.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 04:34 PM
–

No that’s false! It’s generally average to below average women that get ran through the most! Like the top 10% of women (Stacy’s) aren’t on dating apps. I’m not saying that they don’t get loads of attention but they’ve so many options they’re likely to be more selective. Plus they’re also likely to be less mesmerised by Chad as they’re closer in value.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 04:32 PM
2

I think date across! Men usually only have to sleep down! Most couples are looksmatched
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 12:44 PM
1

I think most guys would feel good about themselves unless the age gap is huge 20yrs + before 50
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 12:41 PM
2

F**k the Woke Brigade! Easy get around is to label the fraternity based on sex and not gender.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 12:23 PM
-2

How is 2 bad? Man has a girlfriend who is years younger is a winner in every way? That’s only bitter feminists saying he’s a loser when the reality is as follows: Man dates woman 10yrs younger than his age as he’s zero interest in washed up women his age which makes him a winner/successful etc
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 12:21 PM
4

Yeah but he chooses to enter it! Hopefully he gets what’s coming to him
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 11:59 AM
2

Corrected thanks
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 11:05 AM
1

Always hire externally
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 08:34 AM
1

It he profits out of it and she’s not doing stuff with other men, no, he’s the pimp! If she’s banging other dudes, he’s the cuck!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 08:05 AM
2

If someone did that to me knowingly they wouldn’t live to see Christmas
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 07:53 AM
4

Your friend sounds like scum
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 07:52 AM
10

The only way to avoid the 80/20 which is fast becoming 90/10 or 95/5 for online is to be on an isolated island where the women greatly outnumber the males. Like 4-1 at least
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 07:47 AM
22

Chad is blue pilled and why wouldn’t he be? The Disney movies are real life to him! This is only really true for a top Chad though (top 1%). No top 20% is getting that!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 07:45 AM
9

Top 20%, you need looks + Game to get casual. Top 5% it’s thrown at you
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 07:41 AM
21

Most women don’t get ran through! That’s just grifting! Just ensure you don’t choose one from the 20/25% that have gotten run through. Many people that get married meet in their early/mid 20s and have low body counts. If she’s 30+ I’d be very wary putting a ring on it. Massive vetting is the best approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 07:40 AM
9

Dating apps didn’t change 200,000 years of evolutionary biology and behaviour! It just highlighted the behaviour. Hypergamy has been around forever!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 07:37 AM
–

I think your issue is with “Alpha Male Advice” which is kinda horseshit! The grifters will say whatever gets views. There’s no such thing. No, not all women are the same! They’re not all only fans Hoes! Redpill awareness is just about being aware of female behaviour, how women treat men, how to vet women and having standards. Most guys that get prostitutes realise the juice isn’t worth the squeeze with normal women, especially delusional western women. If they don’t want a relationship with one …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 10:46 PM
–

Nope! Chad is just a description for a top 5% male in attraction! Easier to use “Chad” rather than typing out “the top 5% of attractive males” every time
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 08:35 PM
1

In that case only entertain those that suit your preference! Most guys can’t get any sex so many should be willing to wait to get it in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 02:22 PM
0

You wouldn’t be as worried! It’s not 100% perfect but definitely gives some reassurance
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 02:17 PM
2

If they are not willing to wait a few weeks for a virgin’s first time then they don’t want a relationship anyway. Young women have such high SMV that many guys would wait. Especially the large percentage of single sexless men. I think you really mean 95% of Chads won’t wait
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 02:15 PM
4

Well I’m based in the West so it’s a bit different here. Most people would sleep together before they’re married so you might need to make some cultural adjustments.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 01:19 PM
0

I do think I got lucky yes but this timeline isn’t abnormal at all! All friends who got and are still happily married have similar timeline. If pushing for engagement before the 2yr mark, that’s a worry (baby rabies etc). After that, it’s a genuine case of going ahead planning the wedding. The venues we wanted were all booked up for the following year so we arranged for 2yrs out. This is very similar to others. If you don’t want to get plated, it’s pretty simple: 1) Don’t sleep around casually -…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 01:15 PM
-2

They will! 2yrs to get engaged isn’t long! You should be honest that you do want to get married though. Once that’s in place then you can stretch out the wedding. Not forever definitely but 2yrs is nothing especially with the availability of venues (most popular ones book out a year plus in advance etc). I did all the above myself, 2yrs + 2yrs. Met at 26, engaged at 28, married at 30 to a traditional girl. Still married with 2 kids now over a decade later!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 01:04 PM
5

“How would you know?” Try a little common sense to start! Have a long vetting period (2yr+ before engagement & another 2yr before marriage) Are her friends Hoes? If yes, she’s likely one too…if no, she’s may not be Chat openly about past relationships and let her feel comfortable about opening up: most women can’t keep it inside and will share Is she advertising to men on Instagram: a history of posting thirst traps is a big red flag Is she going on girls trips to places where the relationship i…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 12:57 PM
3

Congrats bro 👊
/r/MensRights30/07/24 11:54 AM
–

Escorts are going to be safer than the ran through college Hoes that don’t use protection.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 10:09 AM
1

The grifters try to make it out that many women do that but that’s just to maintain their audience. A small minority (probably 20%) do that not all women
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 03:14 PM
4

Or “I don’t do that anymore!”…never accept a woman that’s running dual mating strategies (AF/BB)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 02:21 PM
7

Sure the Red Pill godfather Rollo Tomassi is married 30+ years
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 10:07 PM
2

Kinda further reinforces the point that the best women get snapped up quickly and won’t high n-counts
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 04:26 PM
2

Many high n-count women lie about their past to potential LTRs due to insecurity. Are you always honest with your LTR partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 03:01 PM
1

WW made an effort in his videos unlike most of the mono sphere that just react to TikTok videos. Whether you like him or not, looks ARE objective mainly!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 12:24 PM
1

Yeah I think height is an issue if you’re below average. Other than that, it’s nice to have. A 5’10 guy with an attractive face will do WAY WAY BETTER than a 6’3 guy with an average face
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 10:58 AM
1

The point is he outlines in several videos what makes a man attractive. It’s not mostly subjective!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 10:56 AM
0

No they’ll virtue signal an average/below average looking guy with some bullshit like: it’s personality that counts etc
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 07:44 PM
11

Look up wheat waffles on YouTube Women won’t be honest (virtu signalling). Beauty is generally defined, it’s only subjective to a very slight degree. Aka one person could say a guy is a 5 while others would say he’s a 4 or 6. Nobody generally says a 9 is a 5 etc
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 06:44 PM
–

Yeah Polygyny is the future sadly! They’d rather share a Chad that exclusively date a guy on their own looksmatch/level
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 02:45 PM
0

No! This is how so many women are delusional as to their level/SMV! A woman’s rating is basically the guy she can get to commit to her in a long term exclusive relationship where he publicly introduces her as his gf to friends and family! Getting pipped down by Chad after a DTF text on a Tuesday does not mean you are on his level. Men sleep down significantly! The best looking Stacy’s can get a Chad to commit, plain Jane can’t!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 02:43 PM
8

SIMPING through Instagram and only fans is ruining dating! All these average looking plain Jane’s think they’re 10s as a consequence
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 01:05 PM
–

I said over 50, but the difference is larger post 70
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 01:03 PM
–

A lot of single women over 50 are single as their husbands have died though! Women live longer
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 12:26 PM
–

Because they’re all sharing Chad (knowingly or unknowingly)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 12:25 PM
1

Probably lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 10:02 AM
2

I’d say I’m red/black pilled which is just awareness of the dating market and how men & women operate. I’ve never been cheated on that I’m aware of and been in a few relationships. The reason I’d say I’m red pill is I can see how stupid the blue pill lies/Disney fairytales are and believing them would be seriously detrimental for any man bar a Chad!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 08:17 AM
1

It depends on the girl’s age! Early 20s women have the most leverage/bargining power. Women in their late 30s onwards have little bargaining power as they can’t offer family/kids etc plus are likely already a mother of a different man’s kids so it’s really age dependant. Men have far more leverage as they get older on similar aged women
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 08:05 AM
–

Studies have shown that most women are not promiscuous! You are far more likely to run into a Hoe though as they’re easier to bang etc…but the majority of women don’t have Hoe phases, despite what the grifters try to preach
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 10:32 PM
–

You can if you like! Most men with options won’t! I think this is fair, everyone is entitled to go for what they want!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 10:30 PM
–

That’s true but spending money on a girl will not disgust a girl the same way getting ran through by a horde of Chads will disgust a guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 10:24 PM
–

But it’s women that need to hold men to that standard and a woman only really cares about a man’s future and his ability to provide
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 10:21 PM
–

You just find out asking careful non-judgmental questions and they’re generally happy to spill
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 10:20 PM
–

It’s the double standard guys have issue with mostly! Let Chad fuck her in the ass the day she meets him and he didn’t even buy her a drink in her 20s while for Billy Beta “I don’t do that anymore”, please wait weeks for sex and spend loads on me now that I’m well past my prime in my 30s…fuck that shit! If it’s just getting drunk every now and then or trying occasional light drugs once, I don’t think anyone cares
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 10:16 PM
2

Fair point, I really meant unconditional in that he didn’t have to provide anything for them but in the strict sense of the word, it’s not!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 09:41 PM
9

What a fucking joke! She should be named and jailed
/r/MensRights26/07/24 09:26 PM
–

For $300 you’d get a good hooker
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 09:18 PM
1

😂😂😂, everything I’m saying is true
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 09:16 PM
2

I think they’re so mesmerised by Chad that they don’t think straight! It’s unconditional love
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 09:16 PM
5

He is but he’s usually so far out of their league, they’re mesmerised by Chad! They’ll often give him unconditional love anyway! All he does is give them shit sex after a DTF text on a Tuesday…it’s not like Chad gives a fuck about making these girls happy in bed (aka the orgasm gap)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 04:20 PM
2

True my point is there isn’t some female famine where they are very few available. They are available and they look for relationships mostly. If you exclude the 20-25% that are hoes (ONS/FWB, ran through by a Train 🚊 of Chads etc) then there is still plenty of options if you are average looking and have your life together. Best way to meet is usually social clubs (running clubs, tennis etc)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 02:27 PM
5

In the real world there are more females than men and they mostly do want relationships not casual. Despite what most Red pill grifters preach, most women haven’t been ran through and only look for relationships. Walking down any street, anywhere you’ll see far more average looking couples than anything else and the man and woman are usually looksmatches
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 02:22 PM
0

Well that depends on what you bring to the table! They already know Chad won’t commit so they have to settle if they want a relationship/family/kids
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 02:16 PM
6

They can for relationships! For casual it’s take it or leave it
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 02:14 PM
31

Love is only given by women to their children, parents and Chad! For everyone else it’s a transactional relationship! I think most guys are aware of this. I think women, in general are far more unaware as to their value and what they offer/bring to the table with delusional expectations given what they offer
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 02:10 PM
1

My bad! Wasn’t aware, thanks for clarification
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 02:06 PM
1

Banned word?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 01:45 PM
–

He’s earned the right yes but thinking he can fuck instagram models way younger than him without paying them and being average looking is just delusional cope! He could run through a few women in the epiphany phase looking for a husband
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 11:18 AM
1

I’m saying in the past a man needed money as women couldn’t provide for themselves so to be polygynous he needed to be rich! However, nowadays, women do earn a lot and therefore a really good looking man can be polygynous as they’re all chasing Chad anyway! Chad sets the rules and he can decide he’s going to have multiple provider wives/girlfriends. The women are happy as they’ve dated out of their league and can get Chad’s genes 🧬 for kids although they must share him!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 10:00 PM
1

Most men want kids!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:17 PM
4

The manosphere only cares about grifting!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 10:02 PM
1

Hope you enjoy her buddy
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 10:01 PM
–

That’s pretty low standard bud! Basically just a hole
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 09:00 PM
2

Oh my bad! Yeah her or worse for an average guy! If he’s below average then worse…this is for casual only! For dating should be able to get looksmatch
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 07:27 PM
4

The juice ain’t worth the squeeze if your average looking
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 07:16 PM
2

I agree with the EQ, the only issue is it usually takes time before people open up. Then much time has unfortunately been wasted with someone incompatible! The headline comment I responded to was from a likely high n-count feminist that struggles with the concept of accountability declaring “Even asking my n-count is a deal breaker, he’s just letting me know he’s insecure” when red flag women like her (who are highly insecure about their past) would be better off being transparent from the get g…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 12:17 PM
2

Those are good strategies yes!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 12:14 PM
2

Of course they can, they’re just less likely too! Especially as sex is a big thing to them. Whereas a girl that has jumped from cock to cock to cock, it’s much easier to make that leap!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 11:16 AM
2

It’s true you can ask these relevant questions up front but it would save so much time if people had that info up front: Him: 1) What’s you body count - aka any casual/fwbs/ONS so I know whether your relationship material or not Her: 1) What do you make? Please outline your future provisioning ability for me and my potential kids
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 11:14 AM
6

If the girl only wants casual she’ll be significantly worse looking as women sleep up so he’ll be spinning land whales 🐳 His best option is reverse hypergamy so his life would improve although this will be hard to achieve
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 08:59 AM
-2

Divorce is TERRIBLE for kids! End of
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 08:55 AM
1

I really meant average face, just not badly asymmetrical. Again it’s a combo.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 07:45 AM
1

No! That’s false! Average height is 50% of men, average face is probably 60%, reasonable teeth/hygiene is probably 80% etc As I said it’s a combo, low body fat % is dependent on the level. Probably 2% of guys have 10-12% but most young guys would have under 20%. It’s also going to be different by age group. No young guys are financially successful, but guys in 30s can be etc
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 07:44 AM
1

Agreed it should be but for many it’s not
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 07:41 AM
1

Blue pill = more dates, more likely to make bad choices and get cheated on/divorced etc. overlooks all the red flags Red pill = more selective, screens for red flags so when a good match is found, likely to stay together long term. Those with big red flags 🚩 confined to spinning plate status (casual only)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 09:38 PM
1

Yeah but at 40 no one really cares anymore as not looking for marriage or kids with her if the guy has any brain 🧠
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 08:36 PM
1

Yes, average height for females is 5’4 and males 5’9. This is all ages. If you filter for say under 40, it’s probably 5’5 and 5’10 as height increases over time
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 08:31 PM
17

This would only work if men collectively did it! SIMPS have already ruined dating and can’t help themselves. They have the same awareness as Blue flies heading to the electric light ⚡️
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 07:15 PM
4

The most common reason is the man doesn’t want to be cheated on or divorced by someone with no self control
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 04:20 PM
6

I wish women would say this upfront! Like on first date, so you KNOW she has a high n-count and struggles with accountability! This would save so many SIMPs from divorce rape
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 04:19 PM
3

Stacy would need an ankle bracelet for you to trust her though
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 04:17 PM
7

Women: don’t explore when we start noticing you after we turn 30, commit to us unconditionally despite far worse treatment than we gave Chad
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 04:16 PM
4

Average US woman is 5’4 and 170lbs, aka seriously overweight! Following some RP advice would help them
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 04:15 PM
4

😂😂😂 👏
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 03:25 PM
8

Red pill has always been: do the work! Plus awareness of female behaviour. The reality is most guys could reach top 20% by having low body fat/being jacked…BUT THATS DOESN’T AUTOMATICALLY MEAN YOU’LL GET GOOD RESULTS! That just gets your foot in the door
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 03:24 PM
10

Constant stories here about finding about girl’s past, she lied etc and he’s considering breaking up as doesn’t want to wife up a hoe that’s highly likely to cheat/divorce him. She hid it as she’s insecure then gaslights him that he should have no standards/preferences and just accept her. Imagine if he told her he was 6’5 but shows up as 5’6 and then tries to gaslight her that it was her issue/shortcoming for not being secure in herself!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 03:22 PM
2

Well it depends on whether you believe 80:20, 90:10 or 95:5 rule
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 03:19 PM
5

Yeah you need an attractive face to breach top 10% but the OP’s question was on top 20% so average face and jacked puts you top 20%! You still need to work for women but you meet the minimum attractiveness threshold
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 01:18 PM
2

This is true definitely and you won’t get into top 10% without it! But most faces are average so for the vast majority of guys they’ll need to work on body fat %
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 01:15 PM
10

I’d say it’s closer to 2% for abs
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 12:30 PM
5

You are describing the top 1% not top 20%
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 12:04 PM
39

Generally it’s a combo but your worst feature will pull you down. Ideally you need to be: At least average height 5’9+ Reasonably symmetrical & attractive face Low body fat % Reasonable teeth/dental hygiene Confident Financially successful Most guys can be a top 20% with an average face but jacked and low body fat. Most guys are overweight so this factor alone is the big differentiator for 70-80% of guys. Low body fat alone will never get you into that Chad Lite category (top 10%) but it’s gener…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 12:02 PM
11

Why are high n-count women so insecure about past? Just be a good feminist and be open & honest! It would avoid so much issues. Manipulating (by lying) and then gaslighting (it’s somehow his issue) after a guy eventually finds out just causes loads of issues for both!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 08:43 AM
3

It’s easy to find out if you ask the right questions: 1) tell me about yourself - did you travel a lot etc 2) is she a feminist 3) are her friends Hoes - if yes, she’s likely one Eventually she’ll volunteer all the info you need. Until then, keep it casual.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 10:12 PM
–

Generally: Modern Feminist = Toxic Misandrist Supremacist If they actually just supported REAL EQUALITY (not selective equality), cared about men’s issues and just wanted equal opportunity then there would be no issue. But most “modern feminists” want selective equality (50:50 high paid finance/govt jobs but not construction/military etc), don’t give a shit about men’s rights and have a victim complex for their own shortcomings and flaws: it’s always some man’s fault so generally I would conside…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 07:04 AM
8

Priced herself out of the market! Looking for a Ferrari with a $5 budget
/r/MensRights21/07/24 08:02 PM
2

Basically all undatable long term. Short term spinning plates only
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 10:04 PM
–

Of course! When everything comes easy why would you not believe the mainstream ridiculous fairytales I mean it’s crazy/borderline impossible to imagine a black pilled Chad
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 09:02 PM
2

Use logic! They can’t handle it
/r/MensRights20/07/24 02:47 PM
1

I think the guys realise that this seedy behaviour didn’t really make them happier! Banging some ugly chick doesn’t feel great and are more likely to look for a decent woman to have a family with. Plus most guys post 30 aren’t going out drinking most weekends.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 03:09 PM
1

This happened to mid 20s, so post college yes but not past 30! These promiscuous women are usually the low hanging fruit that will go home with a guy. They ruin themselves for life with this behaviour as they overestimate their SMV and hope one day a guy on that level will take them seriously. They end up pricing themselves out of the relationship market.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 03:05 PM
0

This happens all the time! Chad sending DTF texts to plain Jane that he wouldn’t dare be seen in public with. This also happens in night clubs where horny guys will bring whoever will go home with them. I’ve had jacked friends (average looking face but jacked) bring home land whales 🐳 They’re usually disposed of quickly
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 03:01 PM
11

Celibacy!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 02:20 PM
4

I think it really boils down to him thinking this: 1) I can keep her long term with no risk as she won’t leave 2) I don’t have to take the financial risk of marriage. 3) If I knock her up 🤰 she’s never leaving anyway as other men won’t want to be cucks In truth if she was a Stacy, he would put a ring on it asap as he’d be afraid Stacy would bolt! If you were my sister I’d seriously advise you consider moving on to another guy if he won’t commit after 6yrs
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 02:05 PM
3

Yeah that’s fair enough of course if she doesn’t want that and wants to be married before starting a family. She needs to be direct with him and clear that she doesn’t want to be strung along! If she fits the profile of a good wife (Low N-count, no casual history, feminine, attractive, easy to get on with and not terrible with money) then he should either tell her he won’t marry HER and let her move on or put a ring on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 02:03 PM
6

Agreed! This is true! He should be honest with her though if he’s either stringing her along or he just doesn’t see her as a good mother/wife material. This is generally rare than an LTR wouldn’t make a decent wife/mother but it is possible
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 01:53 PM
13

I think LTR material = marriage material generally. Men generally have two categories: - short term casual - long term serious The only reason he wouldn’t consider an LTR for a wife is he is against marriage and state involvement in his relationship. He may have significant assets or be weary of the misandrist family law system in the West. He most likely might be secretive about this fact if he thinks the girl will leave. He might also feel he can have the same benefits of marriage in an LTR (k…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 01:45 PM
2

I think the whole Alpha thing is a load of bollocks! Most guys aren’t Alpha or will never be. It’s just grifting words. To me personally a SIMP is a guy that gives undeserved (unreciprocated) validation to a woman. That’s it. Someone calling holding a door open for someone’s wife simping is just an idiot
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 05:51 PM
1

If she’s happy to have casual partners she’s not relationship material anyway so nothing lost!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 05:45 PM
3

Well I would define simping as giving undeserved validation, aka to someone that gives nothing back! Like paying for onlyfans Hoes or instagram likes/comments to someone that will barely acknowledge your existence. A girl that desires you, is into you and wants to be your gf is different. That’s just treating your woman well. No issue there.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 05:44 PM
3

I wouldn’t describe myself as alpha or beta. I would just describe beta men as mentally weak men that let women dominate them and do things that aren’t in their best interest. The whole trying to be an alpha guy stuff is really nonsense really! An alpha just does his own thing and is considered a leader. He’s not easily lead. Most guys don’t fit this. Being alpha doesn’t have to equate to being good with women: you could be a leader and not good looking but there is generally some correlation. M…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 03:58 PM
3

Only Chad can pull this off and generally the girls are mid
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 02:17 PM
6

How anyone could believe the blue pill lies/Disney movies in this day and age is beyond me! Age gaps do exist but they’re not that prevalent and 20+yr gaps are very uncommon. Generally the older guy has to beta Buxx to pick up the young girl, especially if in her 20s but not so much post 40
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 02:12 PM
1

It’s always going to be easier to find Hoes as they’re always putting themselves out there either for a hookup with Chad or looking for their Beta Buxx
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 08:37 AM
2

The majority of women do not engage in hookup culture! There is a minority that do and they should be avoided for a serious LTR at any stage in life due to their litany of red flags that accompanies that behaviour!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 08:31 AM
1

It’s the delusion that would be the issue more
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 08:27 AM
6

Yeah, we rather have the delusional land whale Heather that feels she “settled”…no great choice but Mina easily clears the rest
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 09:15 PM
4

Mina by a mile: genuine burning desire plus loads of others. Overweight Heather feels she’s settling and is probably extremely delusional. Suzy sounds like a feminist (supremacist/selective equality) and Anna disrespects you publicly! Pretty easy
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 09:13 PM
1

Or to look for a free meal
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 04:39 PM
1

True! But I think society should protect the vulnerable! That includes SIMPS
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 02:06 PM
1

That’s like saying it’s not society’s problem if women get raped! They should just get stronger and learn to fight
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 02:03 PM
1

Many SIMPS are yes! Doesn’t mean they deserve to be cucks
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 01:59 PM
9

Melissa: yes definitely, could work on the minor flaws Alice: possibility as long as no casual history and not obese, could work on the weight Jenny: No! Can’t date a teapot 🫖
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 11:58 AM
1

That’s just cope! Unless you significantly enhance THEIR lifestyle they’re not sticking around. This doesn’t have to be direct payments but paying for all events, trips etc Remember despite what the fine wine copers like to believe, no 20yr old girl is attracted to a 50yr old: https://youtu.be/nG8Fc75bCtc?si=CzPM6wM8D39ex6vz
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 08:56 AM
2

Manipulation: “you don’t trust me from the cheater” Most men being SIMPS etc
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 08:17 AM
1

I meant without paying them
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 08:17 AM
3

A sad reality unfortunately
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 08:16 AM
–

Feminists support Female Supremacy! A supremacist will always see no wrong is their actions. The Nazis didn’t see any wrong in their treatment of the Jews and the Israelis don’t see anything wrong with the murder of children! Feminists are no different
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 09:57 PM
1

Very high status: yacht etc or globally famous. Chad: top 1% looking 5’6 bald guy, zero chance, might get lucky once but not consistently
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 09:31 PM
7

While I absolutely despise paternity fraud and consider it among the worst things you could do to a man: it’s right up there with rape…no country is going to agree to impoverish a child! Lawsuit of course as long as child is provided but best course of action is MANDATORY PATERNITY TESTING AT BIRTH!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 08:55 PM
1

No not at that age! I would ensure my wife was left destitute for wasting my life as a cuck! I would never blame the child though!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 11:38 AM
1

Either really as long as both we’re willing to work on it as long as not obese
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/24 08:54 AM
-1

No! Men sleep down so are less likely to pair bond with a worse looking girl which can be easily replaced! They’re not going to be sad losing the Toyota Camry when another one is easily replaceable! Women on the other hand sleep up (with Chads way out of their league) so the loss to them of a Ferrari is going to hurt them much more
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 06:33 PM
3

Ok let’s make it simple then! Fact: Excess lessens value! The quantum of excess with anything is harder to define. It’s not the number it’s the nature and number by age. Generally more than 1/year is likely to be excessive. Aka a body count of 10 at 20yrs old is too high but not at 30. If the girl has had lots of casual encounters, she’s likely impaired. If she’s had serious committed relationships then less likely
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 03:24 PM
2

The excess lessens value still holds though: sure you know what you want but you’ll also get bored much faster and move on to the next! Again men less effected as they sleep down casually but date on they their attractiveness level generally! Therefore their LTR is better looking than their casual hookups. For women it’s the reverse! The Chads that blew their back out after a “DTF” text on a random Tuesday are significantly better looking than them and their LTRs. This makes them feel like they’…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 03:00 PM
2

That one where you start viewing men as interchangeable commodities!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 02:56 PM
4

Simple human nature: Excess lessens value! This is the case with everything! Even having children…if you had 100 children the next won’t be as special to you compared to having only one child! For example if your one child died it would be devastating! If you had a 100 children and one died it would be anywhere near as devastating as you’d still have 99 left. If the streets were paved with gold it would have no value! The less someone (man or woman) has of something (that’s not bad for them) the…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 02:45 PM
-1

It’s due to human nature and pair bonding effects both men and women. Excess is not valued and too much of something leads to human beings assigning less value to it. If you ate at 50 different pizzerias then none of them will be that special to you. An extreme example is soldiers killing someone: the first kill is hard, guys get sick after, morality, guilt etc…however the 50th kill is just another target. Having many sexual partners is the same. You think pornstars can think a guy/girl is speci…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 02:43 PM
3

It is true and some don’t! It’s true that being a parent is tough for either gender. But studies have reported that many (vast majority @80%) childless women did not intend to be childless
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 02:38 PM
1

Ah come on! Seriously? That’s total cope! Single moms are only ever wanted for sex! Sure if they’re hot enough they can force/demand commitment but it’s never desirable. The rise in the red pill has made far far less men want to be cucks!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 02:08 PM
1

Too big! Al Pacino & Noor Alfallah Having a child when you’ll be dead before he turns 10 is very selfish! But generally 15 years+ is too high to me unless it’s later in life 65 & 50.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 01:49 PM
-2

Agreed and yes some women are unlucky. Others though decide to chase Chads way out of their league until it’s too late and then the relationship material guy won’t want them. Like who would what to be the fool that takes a 30s promiscuous women on multiple dates, spends loads on her, waiting for sex while she’s getting her back blown out by her FWB as soon as you drop her home from your date with her. Or is a massive cheating risk. Or is likely to monkey branch as she’s slept with so many guys s…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 01:40 PM
-1

Women do handle being single better than men, yes! But men also don’t want these women bar for casual sex! Their looks are gone, they can’t provide a family and are really no use for most men at all especially with the likely baggage train that lead them to 40+ & single.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 01:36 PM
2

If they could settle down they wouldn’t be single! The rise is in SINGLE & CHILDLESS women. Your belief is false as there is a larger group of women single over 40 than men. So it’s not true for any age or any attractiveness. It’s the reverse in 20s/30s. Women will always be able to get SEX at age and usually by guys more attractive than they are too but not relationships! This is due to fact that many guys just that interested in women outside sex and see no reason to commit. Having multiple re…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 01:32 PM
-9

Then why is there such a rise in single childless women? It’s projected to get worse. 80% of childless women over 40 didn’t intend to be childless.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 01:12 PM
-2

You’re not going to get divorced raped by Arianna Grande or Jessica Alba. If anything they’d have the risk so guys less likely to care then. But Becky the town bicycle is a different story! Nobody wants her The rise and rise of single childless women over 40 is testimony to this!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 01:08 PM
0

Yes, definitely! The guys that don’t ask either aren’t interested in commitment, hence they don’t care or they don’t ask directly but indirectly. Once the dual mating strategy is apparent the guy will be disgusted especially if he’s the clown that had to jump through hoops for sex. On the other hand if she jumped into bed with the guy first day then he might be more ok with it as he’s getting the same treatment as the Chads. What women seem to fail to realise is they will struggle to get commitm…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 01:05 PM
–

It’s usually down to women’s complete inability to judge female attractiveness and often male attractiveness: https://youtu.be/LHS1pqYPr1Q?si=XliyybIL3SI5ECrE Go to 9:30 and it’s clear from the TikTok trend that those women hadn’t a clue how good looking their fathers were
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 12:24 PM
1

This is why Mandatory paternity testing should be done everywhere at birth! Bio fathers should be made to pay for their child and not the cuck
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 09:13 PM
4

This is more of a 1950s man not a modern man. Most modern men do MORE work at home than their grandfathers did.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 08:10 PM
4

They’re basically mesmerised by Chad! He could be a violent rapist murderer and they wouldn’t care as long as he’s hot. Just look at Jeremy Meeks
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 08:03 PM
–

This is why Polygyny is the future! They would rather share an attractive guy than settle with a loyal unattractive guy
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 07:59 PM
4

True and to add the massive numbers mismatch online between the genders amplifying your points.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 11:47 AM
2

Ah come on! This has to be a joke?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/07/24 11:03 PM
1

The end goal is supremacy!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 02:01 PM
0

1) Mary - low sex drive would be an issue long term 2) Susan - high body count would be short term casual only category 3) Jessica - isn’t really into you and nightclubs red flag for cheating risk 4) May is probably the only date able one long term All 4 are poor options though!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 06:49 AM
1

OP’s post was just a statement that women don’t want a guy that uses prostitutes! I think that’s blatantly obvious just like no guy wants a girl with a high body count. My point was only to disprove the falsely believe female narrative that only losers use escorts when it’s usually the most successful guys that actually do it as outlined by Dr Orion.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 06:38 AM
1

This is probably true for the majority! But as guys have to lower their standards significantly (sleep down well below their own level) for casual, then often the juice isn’t worth the squeeze and would prefer to pay for a hotter woman as you mentioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 06:36 AM
1

Ok well I meant high class escorts not crack addicts
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 07:07 PM
2

He could literally tell them anything and they wouldn’t care they’re so mesmerised
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 07:06 PM
3

I think all guys know that women have easy access to sex at any age. OLD is basically a female land whale’s 🐳 paradise! Relationships with the guys YOU WANT is what women struggle with.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 05:14 PM
1

I’m not saying it’s to be praised! I mean financially successful or successful is his field relative to other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 05:11 PM
1

Double Reported
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 05:10 PM
1

Double Reported
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 05:08 PM
2

For men yes! For women it’s only those guys that will commit on a long term basis monogamously and introduce you as their girlfriend to friends & family. Men sleep down a lot: a top 1% Chad will bang plain Jane on a Tuesday if he’s bored but he’d never commit or dare to be seen in public with her!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 04:43 PM
3

OLD/Instagram has made women delusional beyond belief. Especially as the SIMPS have ruined dating giving those women undeserved validation. If average guys were constantly hit up, told they were kings etc, they’d become a bit delusional too. If average guys were hooking up with girls way out of their league like Dua Lipa/Margot Robbie every week, they’d probably think they are way better looking than they are too, despite getting discarded like a used tampon after sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 04:41 PM
6

They don’t care about his past or behaviour as he’s a Chad! Chad mesmerises them and they can’t think straight or rationally.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 04:37 PM
0

Successful guys - some yes! It’s a fair comment
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 04:32 PM
0

They couldn’t afford it otherwise! Look at the worlds richest and most successful guys and many used hookers. The world’s best looking women are usually on the payroll. This is nothing new
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 04:31 PM
2

It’s part one of a three part series! If you look at the very richest guys in the world (Saudis etc) they’re all using hookers! These billionaires are not exposing themselves to the rise of the misandrist family law system and the very best looking girls in the world are on the payroll.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 04:30 PM
1

Reported
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 04:28 PM
10

Sadly this loser idea is just not accurate! Most of the guys that actually use hookers are successful married guys that want a bit of variety. I’ve a friend that was a Chad in his 20s and banged over a 100 women get hookers nowadays as he’s just lazy. Most loser guys can’t afford hookers. Good link below from Dr Orion explaining (similar reason as to why the best looking women don’t use dating apps): https://youtu.be/-Z62YOHP1uc?si=BltnqsxSyIUJpldy
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 01:28 PM
3

Modern 4th wave feminism = Total supremacy
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 01:25 PM
2

Ok, maybe the SIMPs inside feel empathy but don’t publicly show it due to them being SIMPs. This is probably a more accurate comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 01:23 PM
0

Yes, mom’s in general are out of the work force more so are more likely to need an ATM than a single woman! Speculation is based on the majority but it’s not true for all cases: she most likely got knocked up by a player that she thought naively she could change or chose a poor husband. She’s accountable for this! Just like if a guy choose to knowingly wife up a high body count woman and she cheats on him, ITS HIS FAULT! Your third point is blatantly wrong! Bio fathers have rights legally and st…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 01:17 PM
5

I agree it’s a generalisation and my points are true for the majority! But not everyone naturally. Your story is a sad outlier of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 01:13 PM
7

To address your points in order: 1) It is less likely as she’s probably working full time 2) Yes or that she choose to have a child with a poor choice guy 3) Biological fathers have legal access rights to their kids despite the misandrist family law system. Step parents do not!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 12:59 PM
12

There is no nobility in Cuckoldry
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 12:31 PM
13

It’s because single moms are looking for an ATM 🏧 mostly! It’s because guys that have dated single moms have got burnt badly (cheated on, 7th on the priority list etc, monkey branched). These single mothers generally displayed poor judgement in the past (got knocked up by Chad) and no man wants to be a cuck! There’s zero benefit in it for him! She can break up his relationship with the kid(s) at any time and he has no right to ever see them again. It’s a very poor choice for a single guy, especi…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 12:29 PM
2

Some people are definitely off! Some are just bored commuting
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 08:15 AM
8

I think most men (that are not total SIMPS) do have empathy for most divorced men, especially when the wife was at fault, especially given the misandrist family law system that treats guys like dogs. Less so if he cheated naturally or was physically violent.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 07:45 AM
–

I don’t believe that most men feel this way! Most men love their wives and want to stay married, especially if they met “a good woman” who they’ve a family with. Sure as she gets older she won’t be as hot as the new young one but neither will he! I met my wife while we were both in out 20s and she fit the description of a good traditional wife. We have 2 young kids and I would never consider leaving her for a young one who I would have no connection with just because she’s hot. Despite what some…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 07:40 AM
–

I think you have a very extreme view which is not correct or consistent with many men! Sure young women are hotter, so are younger guys from a women’s perspective, at least physically. Did Leo look better in Titanic or nowadays? What Redpill men resent is a woman getting ran through by a horde of Chads (guys way out of her league), becoming completely delusional, wracking up tonnes of baggage and having to deal Chad’s leftovers: -massive body count -unable to pair bond as every guy is now just a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 09:50 PM
–

I do believe men cheat more but the gap is narrowing due to huge options for even the most unattractive females and the limited options for average men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 01:33 PM
–

https://nypost.com/2022/08/23/women-are-more-likely-to-cheat-than-men-heres-why/
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 12:49 PM
–

Historically yes but I don’t think this is the case anymore due to the modern dating dynamics.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 11:54 AM
-3

That’s complete nonsense and easily debunked! The vast majority of single parent (which is usually single mother) households do worse by every metric. Despite being less than 50% of households, kids born to single parent households make up nearly 80% of US prison inmates. There are far higher rates of teenage pregnancies and far worse academic performance. Men don’t leave as they know single mom raising the kids is a disaster!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 10:55 AM
1

Most men don’t have the option to cheat!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 10:52 AM
-5

The reason men say this is that when surveyed across all ages, countries etc, the majority of MEN EVERYWHERE picked young women in the 20-24 range as their ideal. This was the highest choice whereas for women it was guys closer to their age. This is mainly down to biology 🧬 and what women can provide a man (sex & a family). Women over 35 will generally not be considered for this and the decline in female sex drive makes these older women generally undesirable. Finally a young woman, in her prime…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 10:47 AM
0

Plus proving extensive solo travelling is a huge red flag for an LTR…trains of Chads in different cities/STDs etc…not a hope she can commit faithfully now
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 09:54 AM
–

If men were insecure about being single then they would lie and say they are in a relationship and the skew would be smaller. I think you meant it the other way around. Women are more insecure about being single and if they’re lying, then this could explain the mismatch. They could be lying 🤥 and this could also be a reason. I’m just pointing out that there are multiple reasons and sharing guys is a very common one. If these women were really pressed “has he asked you to be his girlfriend? Has h…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 07:05 AM
–

Online dating Swiping stats prove that this is a partial reason for the mismatch in single ratios. Not all the reason but it is statistically significant! How much of the overall mismatch is due to these shared men is hard to quantify.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 06:32 AM
–

I think a large number of women would say “I’m seeing a guy”, even if that guy was knowingly or unknowingly seeing many other girls probably in the naive hope he will commit.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 06:30 AM
–

There is data that shows women swipe right only on 5% of male profiles online, while men swipe right on 53% of female profiles. This top 5% of men have all the options, aka multiple women. Hence the rise of situationships. It’s also interesting that many of these shared men would probably classify themselves as single but the 5 girls on his roster would probably classify themselves in relationships. This definitely partially explains the 63%/31% male/female single stats for people in their 20s. …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 06:27 AM
1

It’s fine to want that! Many women, especially if they earn significantly less than you aren’t going to be happy with that setup. Most women aren’t attracted to most men! Most women wouldn’t be attracted to a male version of themselves. They WANT Chad & Tyrone! But when Chad & Tyrone won’t commit because of all their options they then need to look for a dutiful beta that will provision, protect and provide. If you hold to your hard stance, you’ll either stay single or likely have to date down in…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 11:33 PM
–

Hey if that’s what you want, I’m honestly happy for you! Society needs diversity
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 11:15 PM
–

Many date up yes but many also sharing the same guy (knowingly or unknowingly). Hence the rise of “situationships”
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 04:55 PM
–

Basically you seem to have the first half of AF/BB! Get ran through by Chads in your 20s before the epiphany phase at 30 and looking for Boring Beta Bob in finance to provide and provision. Although it seems you don’t want your dutiful beta by 41 and still want to chase Chad. Not all women have the epiphany! Although I agree that what women actually WANT is a guy close to their age.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 04:50 PM
1

Why are you getting divorced? Some more context would help
/r/MensRights08/07/24 12:51 PM
4

First off teachers get paid a lot more than daycare providers where I live and have way better holidays. So they’re not burned out. Daycare providers are only going to jail if the child gets badly hurt and it’s proven it’s their fault. Turfing kids into a room with loads of others and saying “go play” is pretty poor for a child’s development. A mother can interact 1-1 with child, read to them etc and help each child develop much better than the jungle that is daycare. Plus she’s far invested in …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 12:46 PM
10

Benefits: children not turfed into a crèche 5 days a week to be neglected by minimum wage staff that don’t give a fuck! Men don’t let women be SAHM for their wife’s sake it’s for his kids!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 11:37 AM
16

The carousel 🎠 rider can never be redeemed
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/07/24 08:09 AM
–

He’d get hoes
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 09:39 PM
1

It’s deleted, didn’t want to offend your family!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 02:08 PM
0

Ok, I didn’t literally mean that, it was a bit of a joke! Feminism is Supremacist movement DEFINITELY but not racist or murderous. It literally doesn’t give a shit about men, men’s rights or equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 02:00 PM
–

Feminism is a misandrist supremacist movement similar to the KKK
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 12:15 PM
2

Dan does make a good point about the total users. Most women are not on dating apps! Most women are not looking to get ran through and mentally damaged by the Chads. They’re not all blue flies attracted to the electric ⚡️ light that will zap them ☠️ Therefore if guys make the effort IRL they do have a chance to meet decent women. I would consider a girl on tinder a hoe and a red flag for an LTR. Hinge or Bumble probably better but Tinder is just chasing Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 10:54 AM
2

The minimum hotness test is true for LTR but that minimum is way higher for short term casual unless she’s really loose and has a triple digit count.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 10:49 AM
4

I don’t think that’s true in Real life. Most couples I’ve ever seen walking down the street are in similar levels of attractiveness in LTRs or those getting married. Often the women is dating down to get her Beta Buxx if the guy is successful. Sleeping down however, is a different story! No Chad is “dating” an average women even if she’s deluded into thinking that. She’s just a Tuesday night “wanna come over”. He’s not buying her drinks or dinner unless she’s above average and if she kicks up, i…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 10:47 AM
4

The West = Developed nations (North America, Western Europe, Japan, Oz etc). This is commonly used everywhere. A study by Green State University showed 62% of men DONT remarry after divorce and it’s higher for women. 70% of second marriages end up in divorce and certainly no guy that’s been taken to the cleaners by the misandrist family law system would get married again. Marriage rates in general have steadily fallen for decades as most men realise the family law system (in developed countries)…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 03:46 AM
0

The Chads wouldn’t bar the occasional as they can get better looking 20s girls. It’s the guys below Chad level that can’t get easy hookups she’s probably getting.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 10:33 PM
4

Most men don’t want to get remarried if they’ve been through the divorce machine in the west! Plus those that do want to get married or remarried don’t want her…they want a younger woman. The 20s have high sex drive and cougars will do to satisfy the need.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 10:32 PM
-3

Respect ✊ that she has self control and sex is special meaningful to her. Lower cheating risk. One could always train her. Plus you don’t feel you’re getting Chad’s mentally damaged leftovers. Now if she’s overweight and is willing to work on that it would a good sign. She’d want to be attractive for a relationship as standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 01:09 PM
15

“I’m no longer open to casual connections” PLEASE God deliver me a dutiful beta that will wait weeks and multiple dates for sex with this balding, ran through 40yr old! I’m gonna predict single forever!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/07/24 12:12 PM
1

Yes I suppose gf to me is quite short term. But clearly in your situation it’s like a defacto marriage so totally understandable your position
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 12:14 AM
1

The hoes were always easy to get just not worth keeping! With hoes, the saying “she’s not yours it’s just your turn” is very true
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 10:46 PM
1

No double standard. I’m married, got engaged after 2yrs. I wouldn’t leave my wife if it happened. Most people when they think of gf think short term, like weeks/months. And yes I wouldn’t expect someone you just knew to be burdened for life if they were recent. You are defacto common law married to me. I’m traditional so gf to me = short term, serious relationship = marriage
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 10:42 PM
0

I mean when you say gf that may not mean serious! Like dating 6-12 months say. Not engaged or married, just gf Naturally it’s a terrible thing if it was to happen!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 03:53 PM
-1

I’d expect she would yes but naturally wouldn’t want her too
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 03:23 PM
3

Some people just don’t want to be hoes
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 01:47 PM
-10

Yeah as false rape is now so prevalent one has to identify the circumstances! Many times it’s just cheating and she’s a hoe! But if it was convicted rape and battery etc and you were married with family you really should support her. If just dating I’d leave her down gently
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 12:46 PM
2

They Simp for Chad and even pay for him…but he’s only the top 1% attractiveness! Bottom 99% they don’t pay for yes
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 07:29 AM
2

True! My bad 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 07:28 AM
–

No those abilities wouldn’t as the history of their use was not positive. It’s the equivalent of saying it is great he’s strong which in general is a positive trait but if that strength is used to beat up people regularly then it’s a negative. Agreed on the second paragraph you wrote
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 10:48 PM
–

If you take a rational approach, unless you are extremely good looking (top 1%) a high body count is indicative of low or non existent standards but indicative of abilities to manipulate and attract women. The guys I know with high body counts slept with girls way below their looks level, it was basically a case of “anything will do”. Promiscuous people in general make poor LTR partners
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 09:45 PM
2

Yeah it seems this is more likely than the really handsome broke guy with 5 provider wives
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 08:53 PM
0

No woman should have to experience any cat calling or harassment
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 07:11 PM
8

Spend five minutes on r/twoxxchromosomes and the level of misandry from toxic supremacists (feminists) is probably on par with this sub. Agree both are bad
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 06:53 PM
2

Exactly! I assume she settled down in the past young and luckily for her wasn’t subjected to the shit show that is modern dating
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 06:47 PM
3

That’s exactly how they would view you! A walking ATM
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 06:45 PM
2

Given you’re not a hoe which seems rare these days then yes you sound like a catch! I wish you the best
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 06:44 PM
1

It’s not! It’s 30% of women identifying as single in their 20s. The top 5% of men have WAY more partners than the top 5% of women as women have standards and are much more selective. The disparity is down to women dating some older but usually many women sharing (knowingly or unknowingly) the top guys. It’s true to say that the guy probably considers himself single while his situationships think they’re in a relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 05:28 PM
-1

It’s does happen! I mean denying it happens is delusional! The degree to which it happens is what’s up for debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 05:11 PM
-4

Their peers yes but the guys (top 5%) that are sleeping with all the girls will likely never commit. The younger girls in their party years are only sleeping with these guys. 63% of men in the US are single and significant proportion are sexless. This only changes when women’s priorities change. When the invisible guys suddenly become considered. That’s the epiphany phase. I mean it’s really hard to dispute! It’s happens for many many women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 05:10 PM
4

Most guys don’t get any casual sex or often any interest at all from girls. Then suddenly when those women realise the hot guys won’t commit and Billy (who was ignored in his 20s) is now a high earner, he’s suddenly marriage material. Ideally women would love a Chad to commit but most of them know he won’t! Not this isn’t for all women as many women meet their husbands young. It will DEFINITELY change for you, as you get older especially if looking for a serious option. I’m sure getting casual i…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 05:06 PM
0

Epiphany phase is a thing for many promiscuous women but yes not for all women!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 05:02 PM
2

It’s simple really! Men sleep down! The higher you are in the male population the higher up the female population distribution you can target which is still below your relative percentile! This is just the way it works as most women don’t look for casual sex whereas most men do. The balance of power shifts around the epiphany phase around 28+ where women realise they can’t keep trying to date (pump & get ghosted) the guys way out of their league as they won’t commit. Then they realise they’ll ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 04:05 PM
-6

Well at least not until the epiphany phase sets in around 28-30 when she realises Chad isn’t going to commit and looks for someone on her level.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 04:01 PM
2

Standard misandrist
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 12:23 PM
-2

No! TRP is just about awareness of how women operate: AF/BB etc and how to properly vet them. I’m sure that there are plenty disgruntled people complaining about other issues but it’s not the core of what TRP is. Just like the core of feminism isn’t misandry but many women identifying as feminists are just misandrists
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 12:22 PM
2

Yes! Of course! Even asking is a stupid question at this stage!
/r/MensRights03/07/24 07:29 AM
–

I mean I do agree that some men are delusional but there is a vast vast gulf between delusional men and women! Men don’t get Simped on (except the top 5% chads) so they don’t have an inflated ego. They also don’t have the myriad of matches online dating that women have. I believe your experience comes from the past 10+ years ago (I’m assuming you’ve settled now) where you might have had a point as there was no instagram/OLD but in 2024 the modern woman is exceptionally delusional!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 03:57 PM
1

Yes agreed
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 02:00 PM
1

Pursue yes but usually unsuccessfully! Unless it’s a sugar daddy relationship and the guy is wealthy, which is rare
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 01:07 PM
1

Yes as Chad dominates and gains more abundance he sets more favourable rules for himself! Hence why I see polygyny as a real possibility for the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 11:53 AM
-1

If women want to have kids they should aim for a serious relationship which will lead to marriage by 25 really! This will give enough time in case a relationship or two doesn’t work out. Chasing Chad in their 20s like some blue fly heading towards the electric light that kills them is women wasting their time which is short for having a family. The secondary effects of high body counts, entitlement, delusion which comes from Simps and chasing Chad makes these women undesirable for many men, even…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 09:52 AM
1

I agree he has more than that but most Russians would prefer to see him gone! 33% of government spending is now on the military which is detrimental to the rest of the economy. The brain drain has worsened and many people in Russia now know people killed or wounded in the war. Nearly Half a million casualties in Russia alone would not go unnoticed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 09:14 AM
0

Most women don’t seek casual relationships and prefer a committed monogamous relationship. They mightn’t get that anymore as so many western women are nowadays unmarriagable but they might get polygyny
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 09:10 AM
1

It’s already happening! When one group (top 5% of men) have a total monopoly they can set the rules as they like: Introduce situationships where the women pine for commitment with the guy they REALLY want. Some girls are delusional and actually believe they have commitments, while sharing a top 5% Chad. Some knowingly and some unknowingly are sharing these guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 09:08 AM
3

It’s true the 95% have the ability to do it but they haven’t to date. It’s like saying it only takes one bullet to kill Putin and end the Ukraine war for good but no one has done it despite hundreds of thousands of Russian & Ukrainian casualties
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 09:05 AM
3

Agreed! Europe is getting flooded with Islam and the terrible fertility rate (mostly due to feminism) is contributing to the end
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 09:03 AM
1

Wouldn’t sharing the guy you really want be better than being single? I’m aware you would prefer to be single that date a regular guy
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 07:40 AM
1

This is my take yes! I believe it will be more popular in future where multiple women provide for the Chad they’re in love with.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 07:38 AM
1

Male revulsion would make this very unlikely except for the lowest tier simps.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 07:37 AM
2

<image> Women select the top 5% of men! They’re not all top 5% themselves. Therefore it’s not hard to conclude they’re looking to match well above their looksmatch
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 07:34 AM
–

That was probably desperation and trying to play a numbers game. Ask every woman etc like swipe right on everything online. Men get rejected so much id say they know deep down where they rank. Women don’t experience this to the same degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 07:33 AM
1

I agree that’s part of the reason and this would make most sense if those in their 30s were skewed the other way. But in their 30s there are also more single men than women and the overall skew is too big unless you argue that women in their 20s are dating guys in their 40s/50s/60s which their generally not! A big reason is sharing of guys. 5 girls in a situationship with one guy probably declare themselves in a relationship while said guy is declaring himself single.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 07:31 AM
1

Mostly desperation!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 07:28 AM
2

Fair point! Polygyny mightn’t just be for looks, could well be for money with a less attractive but rich guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 07:27 AM
-1

My logic is not flawed as multiple studies have concluded that promiscuous people are more likely to cheat! This is for both men and women! Most guys though, don’t have the option to cheat. All girls have the option to cheat given the ease of access to sex for women. Very high body indicates poor self control. Women often regret many of their hookups while men regret passing up opportunities.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 07:26 AM
2

There is obviously a difference! My argument is women already share guys through situationships: she often pines for one guy out of her league while he sees 5 different girls. She’s so smitten with him she’s often not dating other guys! It seems she’s happier with this arrangement than a committed relationship with a guy on her level. Again this is not for all women. But for situationship women it’s not that hard to see a leap to a polygyny relationship with kids while also providing. Women in s…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 07:24 AM
–

It’s mostly defined but some elements are subjective! Most people can accurately tell whether a person is average, attractive or very attractive and the results have a strong correlation.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 11:00 PM
1

This is talking about Polygyny though (where men have multiple wives/partners) not women
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 10:57 PM
1

It’s a possibility yes
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 10:56 PM
–

No! That’s nonsense! Men have to live in the real world and mostly understand that they’re average, mostly! It’s women that are now beyond delusional. This is men’s fault though! The endless simping on instagram, the entitlement and delusional expectations of average women for guys they’d date, getting pumped and dumped by guys way out of their league has lead to this delusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 10:53 PM
–

The current state of online dating basically proves this! The huge numbers mismatch has swamped women with options, therefore they naturally become more selective. So their standards become higher and higher and swipe well above their own level of attractiveness! The top guys get all the matches (top 5%) and have abundance of options. These guys are willing to sleep down but not commit down. There are many videos of very attractive guys online where they show their tinder messages and how they t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 10:41 PM
–

True but there are different levels of attractiveness
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 10:35 PM
3

This is a fair point! Maybe in future they won’t have to lie though
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 10:33 PM
6

It depends on age but I’d say above 30 is high
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 10:32 PM
6

Personally potentially yes! I consider it a risk factor. I don’t have the same revulsion other guys have. However, a very high body count could indicate some mental health issues or substance abuse which would also become a concern. So correlations exist too
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 10:13 PM
3

I agree most women don’t like it! I also know women are chasing guys way out of their league on dating apps and are already sharing these guys = seeing him, hoping he’ll commit while he’s running around with 5 others that all think the same
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 10:11 PM
0

They get a guy well above their looksmatch and potentially his genes for kids. That’s a benefit!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 10:09 PM
1

Agreed
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 10:08 PM
24

Her past has shaped her and defines her like everybody! A promiscuous past means the likelihood of cheating goes way up and that’s a serious worry for a guy in a LTR with said woman. If she can casually jump on the next cock like it’s nothing to her then why would she be faithful to you at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 10:02 PM
-4

I don’t think many men would stay if they knowingly knew about the cheating! More women seem more accepting especially if they’ve lost interest in sex
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 09:57 PM
4

As women earn more and more and outperform men in college I believe they will become the providers of the future even if it’s against their naturally hypergamous nature. Again, I’m not saying this is guaranteed, it is a debate. I’m also not saying it’s going to be for everybody just that it will become a lot more common.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 09:54 PM
2

Exactly with people becoming less social, online dating’s effect will translate further into real life. The top 5% have abundance while the bottom 80% have piss poor options
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 09:52 PM
-1

Many women stay with guys that regularly cheat on them and are accepting of that fact! It’s not the majority but I’m sure you a few examples IRL. It rarely is the case in reverse
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 09:51 PM
4

But in reality they are! Often unknowingly though
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 09:47 PM
1

Interesting take! This is definitely possible too with the rise in screen time and the reduction in social skills among Gen Z! If everyone is always online then it’s a strong possibility too
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 09:46 PM
6

<image> Women only swipe right on 5% of profiles therefore it’s logical to assume that 5% of men are the beneficiaries. It’s not a direct correlation yes but it’s not far off. The average man has no chance online. In relation to sharing this is obvious as there are more single men in their 30s compared to women as well so the theory of women dating older guys doesn’t do enough to dispel the fact that many women are sharing (often unknowingly) the top guys study is pew research centre. Finally th…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 09:44 PM
0

Feminism though is telling strong independent women that they can provide for themselves and it’s a small step to go from there to provide for the household along with all the other wives. I know it’s against women’s hypergamous nature, however, times are changing
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 09:37 PM
2

It usually does! It doesn’t mean the girl doesn’t have other guys on the go but the guy doesn’t commit as he has options (other girls he’s seeing)
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 09:35 PM
6

No! The bottom 60% get close to zero, the guys above that (next 20%) can get poor choices (overweight, multiple kids from multiple fathers etc). Next 15% can probably get ok matches, average girls but only the top 5% get real benefit from the effort and time required
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 09:25 PM
1

The girl gets a guy way above her looksmatch and potentially his genes for kids with partial commitment to her and the other wives. As I pointed out to another poster, this is already happening in situationships where the girl thinks she’s in a relationship but isn’t!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 09:23 PM
5

They’re already sharing them though! The term situationship didn’t exist 15 years ago! The top 5% have multiple women on the go and some of these women falsely believe they’re in relationships. It’s true that some women won’t share a guy but it’s going that way!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 09:21 PM
3

Vast majority of guys can’t get any matches due to the huge numbers mismatch! There are 80% men on tinder. This swamps women with options and they become more and more selective. The bottom 60% of guys get barely any matches and it’s usually a terrible option (overweight single mom etc) Therefore it’s only really beneficial for the top 5% of men who get all the female matches. Data shows that women now swipe right on only 5% of profiles.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 09:18 PM
–

The way it’s going is back to polygyny then! The top 10% of men will have multiple wives while bottom 60% are sexless and potentially very dangerous. This is neither good for women or for most men! Only for the top 10% of guys
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 09:09 PM
–

True for LTRs but not short term casual!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 09:05 PM
–

I wouldn’t agree that for men it’s who they can consistently get for FWB/short term as so many men sleep down! Assuming the 6s hookup with 3s/4s that doesn’t make them 3s/4s automatically as they could probably get a relationship with a 6 looksmatch.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 08:56 PM
–

This is very naive and completely incorrect! For a woman, her league is a guy that will commit to a monogamous relationship long term and introduce her to his friends & family as his girlfriend…not sending a “DTF” text on a Tuesday. Wake up!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 08:48 PM
2

They already make the first move with the Chads, the only guys they actually want! The remaining 99% have to work for it and convince them like some salesman 👨‍💼
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 06:03 PM
1

If YOU want a family and kids you kinda need a relationship for that purpose! Unless you want your kids fucked up raised by a single mom So you are doing it for yourself really!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 10:11 AM
1

I’d never SIMP
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 09:01 AM
2

No not necessarily but women want them for their looks! Now I’m sure they might take advantage in other ways too like abusing their finances but it’s nice to feel wanted and attracted too.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 08:59 AM
1

I never used the word alpha…this is mostly a coping mechanism for guys that aren’t naturally good looking! I only talked about the 20% of guys women find physically attractive. Yes, to your point a lot of attractive blue pilled guys get played hard!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 10:45 PM
3

Only fans?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 09:29 PM
4

I think for the 80% plus of guys that women aren’t attracted too they’re paying in another way usually through beta buxxing! So it’s entirely reasonable to say the practice shouldn’t be shamed!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 09:26 PM
1

I can just see the grifters for what they are! Preach one thing and do the opposite. Like Grift Cooper dating only single moms
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 02:31 PM
1

The thing about the Red Pill is they are first and foremost GRIFTERS! Look at Grift Coopers 21 red flags: It encompasses nearly 99% of women. So trying to get you to find that unicorn which is highly unlikely. This keeps guys watching their highly repeated content over and over. Now Red Pill awareness is important and having standards/boundaries is also important. But the majority of women, even western women are not promiscuous gold diggers! Most want to have a happy relationship! Shows like F&…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 08:11 AM
5

It’s pretty easy to figure out! Usually drunk they start to talk about past relationships, experiences etc Once they say ONS, fwb etc they’re put into the short term fun bucket and will never escape it. If it’s all relationships only then it’s LTR/marriage. If a girl’s friends are all Hoes then it’s likely she is too. But best to never commit to something serious until you know!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 07:02 PM
7

Think she should have added 6ft under once I sit on you
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/06/24 02:37 PM
4

Because it disrupts their sense of victimhood! Can’t have your “oppressor” having issues
/r/MensRights28/06/24 02:36 PM
23

Does she seriously expect that? Or is that a troll post? Might as well: WHERE IS MY CUCK/ATM?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/06/24 02:35 PM
14

“You just proved it exists!”
/r/MensRights27/06/24 10:21 AM
9

I would only attribute 98% of the cause to feminism! They’ve removed men’s motivation to work
/r/MensRights26/06/24 05:28 PM
2

I don’t think your statement is true! There is a higher supply of men who want SEX from women than vice versa. It’s mostly women complaining that they can’t get commitment/relationships from the Chads they’re chasing. Men are very happy to have long term casual relationships as marriage etc is a huge risk for them
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 09:04 AM
32

The growing legion of single mom’s probably regret it too
/r/MensRights25/06/24 03:48 PM
2

His only hope is beta bucks hard
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 06:10 PM
-4

Chad rarely gets into a relationship due to his options. Usually only when he gets old or it’s open on his side
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 05:45 PM
3

Nope: https://youtu.be/35fiNZTVVtU?si=etLPG2nIO5iMEX1X 4 months, 16,000 swipes, 3 disinterested dates, no sex. 6’3, above average looking face and looks fit. Not super jacked yes but that would have made little difference. The face is everything now days! Jacked only for nightclubs where lighting is poor. It’s definitely better than not being jacked but does not get you to the top 10% you need for Online dating success.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 01:21 PM
3

What I meant is that is all that’s required for hookup category! Having your shit together is only important for Billy Beta to get a relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 09:39 PM
2

Then why is the divorce rate so high in the US? If all these people were “in love”. The reality is so many partners makes the next one very likely unremarkable! Excess has never been associated with value. Rarity is associated with value. People treat gold different to gravel.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 06:38 PM
1

Good for you doofus! Doubt that’s true for the majority!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 06:34 PM
1

I assume you have kids? That would make that bond special as you don’t have kids with the other 50! But probably only for that reason. This is true for the MAJORITY
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 05:49 PM
2

No women! But it’s applies for men too
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 05:45 PM
2

If you are fairly jacked, even with an average face that likely puts you in the top 20% of looks. But most jacked guys don’t get hookups. You need to have a top 5% face to get hookups without alcohol but you’d probably be fine getting hookups in clubs/bars where lighting is poor and a true Chad won’t stand out as much. A side note, I used to be friends with a jacked guy with an average face that got loads of hookups in bars but every single woman was average at best to below average. Usually ext…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 05:30 PM
2

Unfortunately that harsh reality is usually that you can’t expect the same treatment if you’re not as good looking/lean/jacked! While this is unfair for 90% of guys it’s the sad reality. The annoying this is that Hoes expect to be treated the same as virgins in LTRs.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 05:25 PM
0

When she hits 30 and starts looking for Billy Beta to provide no doubt he’ll be made to wait weeks/months for access. Probably lie too about casual past.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 05:23 PM
3

Retroactive Jealousy subs are created by toxic feminists for cucks/simps that have no self worth, pride or standards that attempt to shame men into accepting whores. There is no RJ if you just say “you don’t meet my standards for an LTR”
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 05:20 PM
4

If you’ve been with 50 guys then number 51 is only going to be treated the same as a commodity! This is the same for guys too if they’ve been with 50+ girls. The new partners are not special, they’re viewed as disposable commodities that can be easily replaced. Hence paid bonding is impaired I’d argue for both sexes. It’s human nature, if you had 50 different pizzas, 50 different holidays etc etc the next one always becomes less special. Even soldier in war, the first kill usually fucks them up …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 05:14 PM
7

About 12+ studies have proven promiscuous women cheat far more in marriage! It’s statistically significant despite what feminists that struggle with accountability believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 05:11 PM
1

The handsome part is very false! Guys only need to be good looking to get laid. 5’8 and a good looking face, not jacked and not overweight will get way more hookups than 6’3, jacked and average face!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 04:39 PM
2

Oh I 💯 agree! It’s just made me laugh 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 04:51 PM
4

😂😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 04:39 PM
1

Do they allow Chads in?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 03:52 PM
–

Not if you look like Chad! Women don’t care about Chad’s income, resources etc…only his looks
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 10:36 AM
8

That’s complete nonsense! Online dating is a female Land Whales’s paradise! A 2/10 woman has more options/matches than a 9/10 man. A 2/10 man has never got a match is his life.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 09:16 AM
1

They believe in Unicorns 🦄 and they believe they will catch one no matter how little they bring to the table
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 09:07 AM
8

Then to go home if lucky to survive to a pro feminist society where you are treated as disposable dirt
/r/MensRights17/06/24 08:22 PM
32

They should be on the battlefield if over 40 and childless! What have they contributed to society??? If they have young children I’d exempt them if father is fighting. At least one parent should be at home. But why would society want to protect a useless, blue haired, entitled, delusional feminist that’s 40yr old and childless??
/r/MensRights16/06/24 09:29 PM
12

Ah toxic feminism much?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/06/24 04:19 PM
5

Yana Hocking & Annie Knight hoeing and getting ran through hard to pump up those numbers
/r/MensRights11/06/24 02:17 PM
3

“If it’s been said here that women biologically do not have dual mating strategy” which is completely false! AF/BB is certain these days for many women. Hookup with Chad and marry provider Billy Beta. There are literally millions of examples. Just look into your social circle and find the slutty girls that hooked up with guys way out their looks league and “settled” for a guy on their level. It’s everywhere
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 01:21 PM
2

And no man would object to maternity testing
/r/MensRights10/06/24 03:49 PM
2

Because it would force women to accept accountability which is like kryptonite to them
/r/MensRights10/06/24 03:48 PM
3

Yes of course!
/r/MensRights09/06/24 09:28 AM
2

Pass
/r/MensRights06/06/24 04:02 PM
2

That’s like asking the SS to help the inmates in the concentration camps
/r/MensRights01/06/24 08:54 PM
16

They have no issues communicating with Chad and helping him no matter how bad his verbal communication skills are
/r/MensRights01/06/24 08:50 AM
1

Kitchen duty Especially for feminists
/r/MensRights31/05/24 10:21 AM
0

Toxicity is difficult to contain! Just like Covid-19, toxic Feminism/Supremacy spreads fast. It will eventually infect everywhere
/r/MensRights30/05/24 08:08 AM
5

They’re not the problem! Women are!
/r/MensRights29/05/24 08:46 AM
11

False DV charge, a woman’s carte blanche
/r/MensRights28/05/24 03:39 PM
16

Just gonna get pumped and dumped. Chad will be given easy access on day 1 while Billy Beta will be made to wait weeks/months and be required to spend hundreds if not thousands for ran through and used!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/05/24 12:43 PM
4

True! Wants a cuck to take care of another man’s seeds 🌱 even though that other man has them on a 50:50 custody basis!!! WTF?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/05/24 12:42 PM
22

She says “slim” and “model” yet her arms say otherwise
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/05/24 12:38 PM
29

You can’t take them seriously at this stage
/r/MensRights27/05/24 11:50 AM
72

Describes husband as extremely abusing when she’s likely describing herself! Just another ran through modern woman destroyed by feminism!
/r/MensRights26/05/24 03:14 PM
9

You thought “team feminism was all about kindness, compassion, empathy, etc”…ARE YOU HIGH? That like saying the KKK is about ethnic diversity. Feminism is a Supremacist movement akin to the Nazis that aims to subjugated men and classify them into two categories (Fun for sex (Chad) & slaves (Billy Beta). It’s very similar to Auschwitz where the doctors decided who goes to the Gas Chamber and who was fit enough to work.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 07:57 PM
1

At least 98% of modern women are out and out completely unmarriagable
/r/MensRights25/05/24 07:48 PM
1

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 women depreciate faster than yachts or planes
/r/MensRights25/05/24 07:42 PM
31

That’s the modern supremacist! Why date that? Just keep her for her sexual usefulness as she’s a toxic person…think fuck buddy is the way to go with them
/r/MensRights21/05/24 11:30 AM
36

😂😂😂😂💯
/r/MensRights21/05/24 11:27 AM
36

Would you date a supremacist? Same question
/r/MensRights21/05/24 11:27 AM
-2

They’re gonna get a few hard lessons! After getting pipped down by Chads and successful men shunning them for anything serious/long term it’s gonna be cat city cope
/r/MensRights18/05/24 09:02 PM
1

No cheating is deceitful. This would be looking for consent. That’s what I meant but I agree divorce generally is the better outcome as open relationships never succeed.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 09:31 AM
26

That is why married men cheat! Then the woman divorces him and claims it was “all his fault”. Cheating is wrong but it’s perfectly acceptable to say if you are unwilling to provide intimacy then I’m going to have to step outside the relationship discretely. Many women will accept this as long as it’s discrete and you don’t show up with another woman’s baby.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 08:59 AM
2

“Hypothesis”…that makes it sound like it’s even debatable! It’s like saying human’s need oxygen “hypothesis”
/r/MensRights14/05/24 08:13 PM
4

Don’t use logic with feminists!
/r/MensRights14/05/24 08:12 PM
11

Doesn’t mention the number of kids or whether multiple baby daddies etc She’s Prime for pump & dump!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/05/24 06:45 PM
39

Chasing Chad!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/05/24 11:16 PM
3

Nice cars generally just impress other men! Most women barely have a clue
/r/MensRights11/05/24 05:51 PM
1

They mark those guys as Beta Bucks targets
/r/MensRights11/05/24 05:50 PM
51

Women only want to speak to, interact and date CHAD. Everyone else might as well fuck off and just do jobs in the background
/r/MensRights11/05/24 05:44 PM
23

Because they only want attention from CHAD
/r/MensRights11/05/24 05:41 PM
7

Rich Cooper is the target! Beta bucks
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/05/24 12:27 PM
1

Link broken
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/05/24 01:59 PM
5

Priced herself out of the market
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/05/24 09:43 AM
1

Counterbalance to toxic feminism/supremacy Lots of truth but plagued with Grifters selling generic advice and “coaching”. All advice is constantly regurgitated! Same thing over and over. It’s worth learning once then moving on from the space
/r/MensRights29/04/24 07:47 PM
-13

Would love to see a few text examples
/r/MensRights27/04/24 02:27 PM
10

She’s a 4/10 tops, single mom! Bar easy access for sex that all women have, she’s not getting much in the way of relationships from winners
/r/MensRights27/04/24 02:26 PM
2

Hoes
/r/MensRights26/04/24 08:12 PM
12

That’s not how supremacy works!
/r/MensRights25/04/24 04:42 PM
2

Well she has a point! Slave well being does matter to Supremacists/Feminists…only an ignorant slave owner (wife/gf) would neglect her slave’s needs
/r/MensRights25/04/24 04:14 PM
15

Why don’t the straight white Ukrainian men identify as minority trans lesbian women?? Then they’d be higher up the victim pyramid and couldn’t be sent home for EU gender discrimination! Or go full Sam Smith and just identify as a broken teapot 🫖
/r/MensRights25/04/24 03:44 PM
9

Naturally Poland wants Ukraine to fight to the last Ukrainian so it’s not them. I’m surprised they’re not sending the women too
/r/MensRights25/04/24 03:39 PM
3

Quite likely given current fertility rates! Governments only care about where they get the next generation of workers from!
/r/MensRights25/04/24 11:15 AM
1

Did your wife keep the home? Are you still paying her mortgage? Did the new man move in?
/r/MensRights25/04/24 10:51 AM
3

The Juice just ain’t worth the squeeze anymore! Guys are just not going to wife up a ran through, entitled supremacist (Feminists) that aren’t even attracted to guys on their looks level. These women only want the Chad that will never commit and is way out of their league looks wise or a horde of cats 🐈‍⬛ 🐈
/r/MensRights25/04/24 10:47 AM
6

To be fair, it’s highly unlikely this will succeed.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 03:58 PM
2

“Why don’t you get a real job and I’ll stay at home with the kids?”
/r/MensRights24/04/24 11:15 AM
-5

Yeah I agree it’s unfair if the man doesn’t want the kid! But I don’t agree that the child should suffer. He should get something from his/her father plus time from them if it is his child. I have nothing but destain for SIMPS raising other men’s seeds but I have similar destain for guys/losers that won’t support their own biological kid in some way!
/r/MensRights23/04/24 07:23 PM
5

Exactly! I definitely don’t agree with enabling women or financially supporting their lifestyles but the YOUR OWN KID…come on!
/r/MensRights23/04/24 07:20 PM
-5

So you should give your child nothing at all ever? Wow
/r/MensRights23/04/24 07:19 PM
-2

Shocked with all the downvotes from a crowd of outright losers it seems! A man should support HIS BIOLOGICAL children! Yes it should NOT be to enrich any woman, but I mean purely for the child’s benefit! All these SIMPS downvoting while supporting some single mother’s kid that isn’t even theirs are losers and failures!
/r/MensRights23/04/24 07:18 PM
-32

Remove all child support?? WTF? So kids should suffer
/r/MensRights23/04/24 05:21 PM
4

Either provide children or fight! I don’t agree mothers and fathers should be in front line as kids would end up orphans
/r/MensRights23/04/24 04:46 PM
40

Why aren’t childless women over 40 conscripted? Blatant Misandry! They don’t provide children to a society therefore should not have protected status. I would like to see all feminists in the front line trenches!
/r/MensRights23/04/24 04:45 PM
1

It gives you better than zero options! You shouldn’t do all that hustle stuff for women, it’s should be for yourself! Just comes with added benefits
/r/MensRights23/04/24 04:43 PM
1

Blatant lies too! Patient dying while doctor was getting her nails 💅 done is a more accurate headline
/r/MensRights23/04/24 03:38 PM
10

Women = Struggle with the concept of accountability Therefore it’s ALWAYS the man’s or a man’s fault…aka if she cheated it’s both the guy she cheated on’s fault and the fault of the guy she cheated with…never hers…queue some victim, didn’t make me feel special nonsense
/r/MensRights23/04/24 02:04 PM
5

This isn’t true! I would say guys in their early 20s have little to no leverage unless they’re in the top 10%-20% of looks. The bottom 80% have none unless they really date down into the land whale 🐳 market. However, as women age and feel the biological clock, men have far more leverage if they have something to offer (family, improved lifestyle, basically beta bucks). An older woman will always have many options for sex but not so many for serious relationships where she will get what she wants…
/r/MensRights23/04/24 01:08 PM
21

Still trying to chase Chad! The old Chad can date down and this 50yr old is confused by he wouldn’t want her…so delusional
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/04/24 07:34 AM
9

Land whale 🐳 is gutted Chad doesn’t want her
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/04/24 01:42 PM
8

Women shouldn’t date very misogynistic men! Men shouldn’t date very misandrist women aka Feminists as they commonly refer to themselves!
/r/MensRights19/04/24 12:22 PM
1

If I was a single dad, I wouldn’t date single moms either… However, she has insane standards for a 4/10 in looks with two kids in tow, little to offer and likely ran through. This really shows you how bad the SIMP epidemic has gotten.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 07:58 PM
6

What a load of nonsense!
/r/MensRights17/04/24 06:06 PM
5

Supremacy! That was always their goal once they achieved equality
/r/MensRights17/04/24 06:05 PM
34

Civilisation as we know it would collapse
/r/MensRights16/04/24 01:46 PM
1

Best outcome for kids is for parents to live together with the children (majority of cases). Living together = common law marriage
/r/MensRights16/04/24 08:09 AM
2

Highlights the importance of vetting the woman prior to marriage. Cheating with multiple guys sounds like a complete Hoe!
/r/Divorce_Men16/04/24 08:07 AM
7

If you do stuff like that you can be classed as common law married! Same as her using your last name eyc
/r/MensRights16/04/24 07:51 AM
9

Yeah, very unfair on parrots 🦜 to degrade them by comparing them to feminists.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 10:52 PM
40

Wow, what a toxic supremacist! It’s like she actively supports slavery! That one she cheated (get over it naturally) and two he’s wasted 5 years of his life raising another man’s seed is absolutely abhorrent! People like her are the reason why mandatory paternity testing should be done at birth!
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/04/24 01:57 PM
2

It’s part of their quest for supremacy
/r/MensRights02/04/24 02:16 PM
-9

Yes men are attracted to top 53% as opposed to women only attracted to top 20%. But that bottom 47% of women have a WHOLE ARMY OF SIMPS that will take them!
/r/ExRedPill17/03/24 09:31 PM
1

Ah that works both ways! Every guy settles too, unless they’re married to Margot Robbie etc
/r/ExRedPill17/03/24 08:19 PM
5

All should face severe consequences! That’s is horrific
/r/MensRights16/03/24 12:41 AM
4

Movement of Supremacy (selective equality)!
/r/MensRights15/03/24 05:00 PM
-6

Ran through Hoe doesn’t know who the father is…dear god! Confirm paternity first
/r/MensRights15/03/24 03:12 PM
7

They’re mostly idiots so it’s not hard! Just use logic and they can’t respond…probably just some shaming shit and calling you an incel
/r/MensRights11/03/24 02:20 PM
1

It’s the game sadly! I don’t want to have to play it but I’ve little choice
/r/MensRights11/03/24 12:28 PM
6

My strategy is to identify as a trans lesbian woman despite not changing a single thing in my life so I can move higher up the victim hierarchy! If anyone questions my transition, especially a woman they’re guilty of a HATE CRIME…even if my transition happened 12 seconds ago.
/r/MensRights11/03/24 12:33 AM
1

Ah the 0.0001% of mostly men and women then highlight that the remainder of men are viewed as disposable slaves…look at wars
/r/MensRights10/03/24 08:14 PM
19

Look I agree that child bearing women should be protected as a country’s future should be its children and the women that are mothers should be protected! HOWEVER, I see NO REASON why a 40yr old childless Feminist shouldn’t fight in the front lines! Women that don’t have kids past 35 should be drafted and anyone over 40 should go to the front. Those 35-40 could still help in a safer rear and naturally be removed from danger if pregnant
/r/MensRights10/03/24 12:20 PM
28

War Brides move on quickly
/r/MensRights10/03/24 12:19 PM
2

Don’t worry OP! You can always move up the victim hierarchy by becoming a trans lesbian woman! Definitely my plan in future with zero actual change in my life but a nice victim card if needed…plus anyone that questions my transition (even if it happened 30 seconds ago) is guilty of a HATE CRIME!
/r/MensRights08/03/24 06:38 PM
8

Because they’re SIMPS
/r/MensRights06/03/24 10:41 PM
9

Definitely going to be a Lesbian Trans Woman in future. No actual operation or any change whatsoever in my life but if anyone questions my transition: ITS A HATE CRIME! …..even if it happened 12 seconds ago
/r/MensRights06/03/24 07:43 PM
2

This is true but in Ukraine the average age on the front lines is 43. They’re trying to protect their youth so in this case 40+ women would be in age range. All women could be trained and conscripted to serve in the rear, in relatively safe areas. Then sent to the front if childless…definitely would solve the fertility crisis
/r/MensRights06/03/24 04:54 PM
0

I think while women of child bearing age should be protected as they fulfil an important role, childless women should receive no special protection. They should be in the trenches alongside the men. All childless women over 40 should be eligible for conscription and barred from leaving Ukraine.
/r/MensRights06/03/24 10:11 AM
14

That’s all? They need to WAKE UP!
/r/MensRights05/03/24 06:19 PM
3

Equal pay for equal work exists! Feminists want equal pay for UNEQUAL work!
/r/MensRights05/03/24 08:08 AM
4

😂😂💯
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/03/24 06:46 PM
10

You have very little to offer a man outside sex if you have 4 kids with another man. The kids understandably will take all of your time, money and effort. There is not much left for you to offer a partner especially if you have prime custody! You need to be realistic with that. Personally avoid childless men and look for other older divorces. Make it clear that you’re not looking for an ATM 🏧 or a step dad. Then I think you could have some results.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/03/24 01:12 PM
20

Priced herself out of the dating market! Total lack of self awareness! High body count, tattoos, baggage train and somehow increases her standards??
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/03/24 12:30 PM
22

He lost badly! He’s the unattractive beta provider SIMP that she’s using for resources…how the fuck could he possibly have won?? The Chad she’s pining for won! The Chad had her with little/no effort and in her prime years too. That guy got Chad’s leftovers when she couldn’t pin Chad down. It’s really annoying when women say “he won” as it has to be the biggest lie in history!
/r/MensRights28/02/24 08:41 AM
13

More bullshit from the Feminist quest for supremacy (selective equality)! Next headline will be help men accept ran through women for marriage!
/r/MensRights27/02/24 09:15 AM
3

Disgusting vile creature
/r/MensRights27/02/24 09:10 AM
4

I think a “real man” is one who does what suits him and his purpose. Feminists try to liken a real man to SIMPs or CUKHOLDS…”a real man will raise my/Chad’s kids even if they’re not his” etc and bullshit
/r/MensRights24/02/24 10:48 AM
-4

Isn’t this what Redpill teaches?? Go for traditional wives etc
/r/MensRights22/02/24 01:54 PM
2

True that!
/r/MensRights20/02/24 09:18 AM
3

False! Far Far worse if women cheat
/r/MensRights19/02/24 01:57 PM
5

Ignore the incel/insecurity nonsense shaming tactic too and just hold frame! Hoe’s are for fun only
/r/MensRights19/02/24 01:38 PM
0

True that!
/r/MensRights19/02/24 01:37 PM
-6

Aka it’s a myth! It used to exist but doesn’t really anymore
/r/MensRights19/02/24 11:57 AM
20

You can’t win with Supremacists (Feminists) so best to not even acknowledge them and always act in your own best interests.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 08:22 PM
0

Definitely not in the western world anyway! They’ve done enough damage!
/r/MensRights16/02/24 03:41 PM
6

No, 2024 is all about the Victim Hierarchy! They’re upset trans people can portray themselves as the new greatest victims which has dented their quest for supremacy (selective equality).
/r/MensRights15/02/24 09:15 PM
1

Lack of accountability!
/r/MensRights15/02/24 08:51 AM
1

Because they’re too busy…riding the cock carousel 🎠
/r/MensRights14/02/24 04:32 PM
2

Solipsism- can’t see past their own nose 👃
/r/MensRights14/02/24 04:31 PM
1

Naturally! This fits in with the victim complex!
/r/MensRights13/02/24 02:09 PM
1

It’s vernacular these days. I didn’t invent it
/r/MensRights12/02/24 06:34 PM
0

Women don’t marry broke unless he’s a Chad
/r/MensRights12/02/24 03:24 PM
-2

“She is trying to live a standard life where she has male friends, and if she likes, goes clubbing, you shouldn’t really have a partner” This statement has more red flags than a Chinese Communist Parade! No man should go near a woman that keeps male friends (SIMPs who only want to bang her) and goes clubbing (where she craves male attention) in an LTR. Leave her back on the street!
/r/MensRights12/02/24 01:44 PM
18

Not unless reverse hypergamy but femanazis wouldn’t make that mistake. Plus they’re likely ran through and highly likely to divorce/cheat which they will spin into some victim story about how it was the man’s fault.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 11:19 AM
5

Jana, the most ran through woman in Australia giving advice while turning 40 and can’t find a guy to accept her long term. Wow
/r/MensRights10/02/24 08:39 PM
10

They don’t want equality, they want supremacy! (Selective equality)
/r/MensRights10/02/24 08:35 PM
7

Those men should all be tagged and have the word “SIMP” branded onto their foreheads
/r/MensRights07/02/24 06:47 PM
1

This is going to be the best investment ever! AI sex robot will end women’s dominance of the dating market and finally end the SIMP economy
/r/MensRights29/01/24 03:54 PM
-3

That’s fucked up! But it’s not the kids fault. I’d try to be part of his/her life if you can. At the end of the day, he’s still your kid. But do a paternity test to be sure.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 01:42 PM
5

It’s true! There would be no war as they’d have killed off the entire population in one massive nuclear war over a dirty look or how something made them feel
/r/MensRights19/01/24 11:01 PM
2

More men’s groups and real life meet ups
/r/MensRights06/01/24 07:43 PM
29

If you ever hear the words “real man”, you should immediately replace it with “SIMP” or “LOSER”
/r/MensRights03/01/24 08:06 AM
26

Polyamorous which basically just means openly selfish
/r/MensRights03/01/24 08:04 AM
15

Anyone that says that is basically an idiot! The building they live in, everything they use was built/invented by a man. There is zero point in debating these clowns
/r/MensRights01/01/24 11:08 PM
2

It’s just part of the quest for supremacy!
/r/MensRights29/12/23 09:25 PM
3

You should be defensive especially post me too. I would raise this complaint to HR so it’s on record and you can present your side. Use feminist words such as you are being victimised, gender discriminated and oppressed due to being the only male. Keep personal copies of the HR correspondence in case you need it for legal reasons. Keep everything in work strictly professional, don’t engage in any small talk (work only) and don’t have closed door meetings one to one with any women. Communication …
/r/MensRights28/12/23 08:32 AM
3

Why do you comply with this? Move country? Or huge income
/r/MensRights26/12/23 01:25 AM
3

No income and time spent working definitely counts! But a guy that earns less than his wife often feels entitled to do fuck all at home! That’s why divorce rates are so high, most women have a raw deal married to losers
/r/MensRights24/12/23 10:15 PM
14

Feminists don’t want equality! They want supremacy (selective equality)! They want equality in board rooms, government jobs but not in coal mines, the military, garbage collection, construction or any of the most dangerous jobs men do in society. Best not to take them seriously when they display that attitude. Men do need to contribute more generally in the household but to women that appreciate them and help raise their kids (not another man’s kids).
/r/MensRights24/12/23 01:21 PM
8

There is ZERO nobility in cuckoldry
/r/MensRights23/12/23 10:49 AM
11

Dunno how this was ever “manning up”…man up would tell a guy to run a mile and raise his own kids
/r/MensRights23/12/23 01:14 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter