TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Psuedofem Archive

View 1 posts and 242 comments by Psuedofem on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Why are your social norms any better than someone else's, provided that they both do no physical harm? fuck off ya cunt.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 08:21 AM
1

I'm sure you can be lower class and be a douche. But saying that everyone who is lower class is a douche or doesn't deserve to exist is disgustingly snobbish. That's like me saying everyone who like country music or describes themselves as a redneck is a piece of shit. So why don't you relax, you poftah? You've got a good rack, so just pull your tit's out and relax a bit, eh!
/r/MensRights16/03/15 10:12 PM
2

Didn't irk me in the slightest. I love casual banter, and the disrespect they where showing was far worse than being called "darling"
/r/MensRights16/03/15 08:07 AM
4

Im saying I don't know the context of that particular altercation so im deferring judgement and that your disdain for someone else's identity is a little patronizing and you would do well to look at the good that "lad culture" has done. Personally, I hate call of duty fans and frat boys but im not going to say that call of duty and fraternities are evil and shouldn't exist. They don't harm anyone and in many cases they do a lot of good in charity and volunteering. Fraternities that is, CoD fans …
/r/MensRights16/03/15 08:01 AM
2

I thought so, but I didn't want to misquote him and I was too lazy to google. Anyway, thanks!
/r/MensRights16/03/15 04:40 AM
7

I would disagree about your characteristics of lad culture but I think the point to be made is why does Clarksons gender matter in this debate? Furthermore, people like him because he's entertaining and from what ive heard his boss is kind of a cunt. The feminist "comedian" on this show simply doesn't understand why offending touchy bitches with the swagger of a cowboy and the looks of a fashion model are entertaining and that's also why they attacked milo for having a sense of humor and calling…
/r/MensRights16/03/15 04:38 AM
1

Sure, but im arguing in general. As a baby, boys and girls should be loved as much but boys, even as babies, like boyish toys. I forgot who said it, but "the greatest inequality is making two unequal things equal"
/r/MensRights16/03/15 03:28 AM
2

I would argue that milos response to this criticism was spot on. The thing about boys is, they aren't girls and shouldn't be treated or expected to act like girls and when they are they're pumped full of Ritalin to make them calm down because being a boy is now a mental disorder. Sure boys aren't treated well now but treating them like girls isn't the answer. I think a lot could be learned from the black communities faults in raising its children, mostly that their children are so much more pron…
/r/MensRights15/03/15 11:49 PM
19

Really questionable change in hair color though, the neon blond looks ridiculous on him. I also love how angry the feminists get when their ideology is questioned by someone with facts.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 01:18 PM
3

eeh, that's a bit of a stretch to be honest. It's not that I don't sympathize with this, I mean I'm gay and I may want to marry my boyfriend some day but... I still feel that it's a stretch. Although at the same time, homophobia is inherently attached to the societal enforcement of gender roles and homophobia has had a VASTLY disproportionate affect on gay men than lesbian women in both social stigma and societal harm. So I suppose it could be seen as a venn diagram. Not all gay rights are men's…
/r/MensRights14/02/15 09:31 AM
1

Because "Nigga" and "Nigger" are two different words with seperate meanings. Right. But you see, when a black person says it, his skin color adds context, therefore it isn't perceived as racist. So yes, you muppet, context in language is very important.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 07:47 AM
1

Words require context to have meaning. If words were absolute, then every rapper would be racist.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 10:31 PM
1

Say what you want about bill o'reily's politics, but that presentation was brilliant and it exposed the feminist hypocrisy with such devastating accuracy that.. well, nothing else needs to be said.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 07:02 AM
2

Well, the legal difference between the two is that women only spas and gyms have to be private clubs, while this barbershop is open to the public. At least in the states, a private club can discriminate against whoever it wants; a good example is boy scouts and homosexuals.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 06:06 PM
1

In the states, no. Private clubs can discriminate against whoever they want; case and point, boyscout and homosexuals.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 05:06 PM
2

Well, the difference is, this barbershop is open to the public, and women only gyms are a private club. So... this is technically discrimination. He should just make the Barbershop an exclusive club for men.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 07:20 AM
2

That wouldn't apply to this scenario though, as defaming would require her to make the person's "bad character" publicly known. Telling her husband about it in their home doesn't amount to defamation. but meh, I'm just being a nitpicky armchair lawyer.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 07:01 AM
1

Not sure you can say that, unless it's backed up by statistics.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 06:59 AM
0

You know, I actually have some misgivings about this. I suppose it having a 6 month waiting period makes this aspect less prevalent, but I would wonder how taxing it would be on government or local administrative bureaucracies if someone did change their gender several times. Also I disagree with the idea that one "Decides" their gender. I believe strongly that one's gender and sexual orientation are biological, and science backs this up. If there is a way, in the future, to easily prove that on…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 06:57 AM
0

Well, his justification wasn't "I was wrong to say it." It was "Racist people think they get to say nigger" Saying that there are a lot of bad actors in the black community isn't racist, it's simply... well, pointing out an issue that needs to be fixed. Using the word nigger to describe them isn't inherently racist although it does lead one to wonder about their motives. Because of this, and because of the constant blaming of white people for any issues within the black community (no matter how …
/r/MensRights16/08/14 05:45 AM
3

Well yea, but ok. If someone accuses you of being a murderer and you say "No I'm not, you're lying" that's essential saying the same thing when someone accuses you of raping them and saying "No I'm not, you enjoy sex!"
/r/MensRights11/08/14 02:39 AM
0

Well that's the issue. And it's basically the argument of "the chicken or the egg" If racism caused black people to be poor, and now they're poor but racism doesn't exist anymore, and they're only poor because of the cyclical nature of poverty then technically social standing isn't determined by race. It's determined by class. which at some point in history was determined by race. Now the question is... how do we blame white people? Just simplify it and say white people keepin da blak man down
/r/MensRights07/08/14 02:05 AM
4

I would personally dispute this on the grounds that on all measurements of success, class is now the largest litmus test of success in life rather than race.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 04:34 AM
1

Though go ahead, keep preaching that criminals deserve more rights than innocent civilians. Strawman. So someone breaks into your house, attacks your family, appeal to emotion they start to run and you have the opportunity to ensure they do not do this to another family or yours again and you just let them go? leading question, false dichotomy, appeal to emotion I don't think so. argument from authority. You're not thinking in the right state of mind. You have no intention of committing a crimin…
/r/MensRights03/08/14 04:55 AM
1

You really love your revenge porn. Keep stroking that ego, buddy.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 07:04 AM
3

"not trying to start anything, I'm just trying to confirm or deny this prejiduced stereotype" MRA's aren't all one person with the same opinion. Also MRA's aren't women hating caricatures. Most MRA's respect a woman when she says no, even if the no is directed at feminism.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:56 AM
1

All those cops, by the way? Yea they committed murder too. They just get off because of blatant racism/nepotism/corruption. I hope you're not suggesting the same kind of treatment for everyone who decides to shoot someone who's pleading for their lives.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 07:02 AM
0

Anyone who has not surrendered is a threat. You're ideology is why so many civilians are killed in war. Congratulations, Mr. Holocaust. (By the way, your ideology is logically and legally unsound. If you can find me one example of "not surrendering" being the definition of immediate bodily harm I will suck your dick, which will be the most action you will never see.)
/r/MensRights27/07/14 07:01 AM
0

So, according to you, anybody that attacks me when I am in retreat, and just happens to kill me, is a murderer? As much as you'd like to masturbate furiously to your revenge porn, siting high on your countless logical fallacies and pleas to emotion that would just leave me in tears as you copulate vigorously with the rule of law, yes. Every citizen of the united states is endowed with a right to due process, which is a trial by their peers, not fucking vigilante style revenge killings. However, …
/r/MensRights26/07/14 08:38 PM
2

I'm a libertarian, fucktard. "My displaced sense of self worth based on the cynical, illegal, unconstitutional, unchristian and immoral assumption that some people deserve to die without due process is threatened by someone disagreeing with me on the internet WAAAAAAAHH"
/r/MensRights26/07/14 07:16 PM
-2

However, turning your back to someone doesn't show an immediate threat to bodily harm, therefor self defense doctrine doesn't apply. You guys are fucking idiots.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 06:40 PM
1

As a general rule, self-defense only justifies the use of force when it is used in response to an immediate threat. http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-law-basics/self-defense-overview.html im·me·di·ate [ih-mee-dee-it] Show IPA adjective occurring or accomplished without delay; instant: an immediate reply. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/immediate I said that it is just as shoddy of a defense, not that they where exactly the same. And guess what? Saying "it could happen in the future" -i…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 06:37 PM
1

Yea no. Castle Doctrine and self defense doctrine implicitly mentions threat of immediate bodily harm. Immediate meaning in that exact fucking second. For good reason too. In the exact second that he shot the pregnant woman in the back they had no weapons and she was pleading for her life. He was motivated by revenge, which makes it murder. That being said, she got what she deserved. The unborn child didn't.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 06:36 PM
0

Ah yes, so not only can castle doctrine travel to the future, it can travel to the past. You're not understanding what immediate means. Immediate doesn't mean "Well they might have done it in the future." Immediate means in this exact fucking second. In the exact moment that he shot the pregnant woman she was begging for her life. There was no threat to his person. It was completely motivated from revenge. That is murder.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 06:34 PM
0

The man was in fear for his life and his property, simple as that. Yes, he was in such fear of his life as the woman pleaded for her life begging him not to shoot her. That is such fucking fear. I'm not supporting what they did, I'm just saying that for anyone to say that he acted in self defense is an idiot who supports revenge murder. Also you cant sue someone in that bizzar hypothetical situation. If you are harmed while breaking a law, legal doctrine states there is no liability for any harm…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 06:30 PM
2

No. The law does not work like that. You can only act in self defence from an immediate threat to your life or well being. "They might come back" is just as shoddy a defence as "all black people are dangerous"
/r/MensRights26/07/14 04:24 AM
1

You can't defend yourself in the present from a harm that was done in the past. Time travelling castle doctrine doesn't exist yet
/r/MensRights26/07/14 04:22 AM
0

That you don't understand how frustrating and limiting it is for women to be told, in the same breath, that our breasts are both sexualize and disgusting, is, well, frustrating. This is not a thing that happens, and if it does it is by a religious minority probably based in the middle east. Furthermore, body issues are not a female issue. For every one woman with an eating issue there are two men who use steroids. We should probably go back to why you think everyone has to agree with you. The ki…
/r/MensRights14/06/14 08:59 PM
1

If you buy into this, you buy into thinking humans are no more than their biological urges, giving credence to the idea that men are sex-driven maniacs. No more than their biological urges? No. However, we do have biological urges and they are innate genetically evolved biological urges, period. What we have that makes us better than the animals is self control, but that doesn't mean the urge isn't there. In fact, in the scientific community there is no consensus as to where sexuality comes from…
/r/MensRights14/06/14 02:18 PM
-1

Pee can be used as hydration in an emergency. Should we let people flash their cocks because it can dispense "water"? Breasts are genetalia because they have evolved to be the sign of fertility. This sign of fertility activates the sexual visual sensors in the male brain similar to how big butts and whide hips do the same. Therefore, it is a fucking sexual organ.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 05:35 AM
-1

2) Not an issue. Breasts are a sexual organ, period, and they should be treated like genitalia. If anyone argues, answer this; if you grabbed a woman's breasts, would you get hit with sexual assault, or regular assault? (or if you're a woman, what charges would you press?_ yea I thought so.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 08:20 AM
1

There are no soft issues that aren't linked to legal prejudice or any other objective negative outcomes for men. If there is a "soft" issue that isn't linked to an objective negative outcome, it is not an issue. demonizing masculinity causes star chamber rape tribunals that deny men due process. Media representation.... not so much. Unless you can link this to fatherelessness or male rape not being taken seriously, it is not an issue. Fatherlessness, btw, is a huge fucking issue. Literally, fath…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 01:33 AM
2

Well they probably didn't have the time for full sentences, you know. Gotta get all the gimmick you can out to the people.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 01:31 AM
5

MRA fantasy : Be free of a legal and cultural society where men are unable to defend themselves from false accusations of rape. Feminist fantasy : All men who are accused of rape are castrated.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 01:26 AM
6

Seriously, no. Take this down. the MRM doesn't need to be linked to 4chan or /r/thathappened level stories.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 01:15 AM
0

An MRA will bring up statistics about custody rights (recorded legal facts), but a feminist will respond with rape statistics (a survey of non-recorded feelings, memories, and experiences) You're right about one thing. The MRA will bring up recorded legal facts. The feminist will bring up falsified statistics using near Orwellian levels of deception to shoe-horn rape and wage earning into feminist thought. So yes, you're entirely right about one thing. MRA's are fighting against real oppression.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 01:13 AM
5

If we ever do move into those "soft" issues, I'm out. Soft issues are akin to cultural marxism; it promotes a single identity of what "maleness" is and what "oppression" is and it dictates to men how they should feel about it. This is why I hate feminism. If the MRM becomes like that, I'm leaving.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 01:11 AM
4

Read the comments. "Feminism helps men because the patriarchy hurts men too!" "Why should we care about men? These issues are caused by the patriarchy."
/r/MensRights13/06/14 01:06 AM
1

This just in: He was half jewish half asian. Zimmerman was half jewish half hispanic. But when they do anything bad, they're "privileged white males" I guess it's better than being labelled a thugh if you're black. Still racist tho.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:39 AM
2

Well, as a fellow homosexual and a white male I'll remind you that all you have to do is provide your "Patriarchy" card, the one they sent you in the mail proving that you're a part of the patriarchy. It has a checkbox on the back for gay men.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:28 AM
3

oh, so they're basically pointing and screaming "Muhsojuneh" .... yea ok. I get it now.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 05:48 AM
7

So boring to read through. Just gimme the gist of it; the hell are they doing, and how do we stop them?
/r/MensRights11/06/14 03:34 AM
-1

society and by that extension women women are not society, nor do they create society. Women are a products of society, as are men. We can combat the culture in society without faulting women or men because neither of them have created the sexist culture. Your logic is a little off, but I get your point and disagree with it.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 05:03 AM
1

Well, thats AVfM for you. While I personally think feminism has capitalized on inherent sexism against men, AVfM sees that as feminism being the primary actor of sexism against men. It's a little bit of a deference in syntax, but it does make a difference. However I think anti-feminism is gaining traction outside of liberal hive-minds like reddit.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 04:21 AM
2

Also, look at all of the twitter responses. This was fucking brilliant! GREAT PR! Very good!
/r/MensRights09/06/14 04:03 AM
2

Brilliantly done. But THAT FUCKING TIE WHY IT IS SO BAD
/r/MensRights09/06/14 03:54 AM
1

u got me :<sup>)</sup>
/r/MensRights08/06/14 05:44 AM
1

http://i.imgur.com/kJTEdFv.jpg?1
/r/MensRights08/06/14 04:18 AM
5

Depends. Do you want people to think you're a sexist asshole? If yes, then carry on. If no, then re-consider your word choice.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 03:35 AM
5

It could be misconstrued to say that. You should re-consider your word choice.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 01:56 AM
2

Here's a link. Christina hoff sommers puts it so much better than I could. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFpYj0E-yb4
/r/MensRights08/06/14 01:43 AM
1

.... exactly. one gender doesn't "owe" the other anything. People owe other people a modicum of respect for life, but that isn't about male or female, that's about being human. But anyway, confirmed for a concern troll, gtfo.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 07:40 PM
17

Never mention the words "Men's rights" Just talk about the issues. I talk about boys in education all the time and I bring up my nephew's experience (I'm his guardian) and how incredibly hostile public schools are to boys. Most people listen if I'm talking about it, and there's no big deal. People are usually sympathetic. The problem is when you mention those buzzwords, that's what "triggers" people into negative responses.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 07:19 PM
1

/r/nottheonion
/r/MensRights07/06/14 06:59 AM
0

WTF's up with that tree man? Is he holding a pot and a spoon? Damn. I want to see more of that guy, and take acid.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 06:55 AM
1

link to the show
/r/MensRights07/06/14 04:33 AM
6

the group killed 315 people Yes, 315 people, because mentioning that they where all men isn't important.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 04:23 AM
1

idk, I just found it somewhere.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:13 AM
2

Yes, then maybe we should change that. Or maybe we can get non-voting men to vote
/r/MensRights05/06/14 04:19 AM
2

There are no current political solutions, however there is a cultural solution. We can build an in group preference for men.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 03:29 AM
2

Don't think so. I think so long as men don't vote as a block like women, so long as men don't have a collective voice that advocates for male issues we will never succeed.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 03:22 AM
0

The only reason the media pays any attention to us is because of his attitude. Do you really think the media gives a fuck about male suicide or faithlessness in the black community? No, they fucking don't. First they ignore us. (They've been doing that for litteraly 100 years.) Then they laugh at us. Then they fight us, then we win.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 03:12 AM
6

Ah yes, we should just be nice and polite and try and reason with them! That will surely work, I mean it's only been 100 fucking years of trying that tactic. http://imgur.com/LDvJr3V
/r/MensRights05/06/14 03:06 AM
1

good job strawmanning an argument together. I bet you feel really proud of yourself with yourself indulged ego stroking.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 07:35 PM
3

There is absolutely nothing in feminism that is untainted by the central ideology of bullshit. The idea that there is an invisible all-knowing patriarchy that exist in all societies, as commonly used in feminist circles is the very core of why feminism is wrong. And I don't mean, feminism hurts my feelings. Feminism is factually and demonstrably wrong and almost everything they put forward as a fact or proof of this patriarchy is factually incorrect, historical revisionism or a half truth coated…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:13 PM
3

Except apparently women's suffrage Actually yes, that was fucked up too. The right to vote, without the duty to the government in the draft is equality without responsibility. And lets not forget that many of those suffragettes went on to be nazi sympathizers, and they also voted for prohibition. So yea, women got the vote just so they could institute prohibition. Even women's suffrage was ruined. based on the bad seeds The difference between the MRA strawman and the feminist strawman is that th…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:02 PM
3

Individual feminists are welcome in our group. In fact, Christina hoff sommers is a favorite on this subreddit. However, we will never work with feminists. Because feminists won't let us, and because we would rather eat worms. Feminist operate under a misandric framework of thought. It is a very traditionalist framework and it is incredibly dogmatic and it permeates absolutely everything they do and it is shown by the catchy little propaganda phrases they throw around. One in Six? A statistic ma…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:31 AM
1

Just remember everyone, feminism is AGAINST stereotyping all women as mothers. Unless it benefits women in child support or alimony cases, in which case fuck men, amiright? Equality when we want it, sexism when we don't!
/r/MensRights02/06/14 05:54 AM
2

How fucking dare he have a penis and want to have sex! That fucking SHITLORD MAN-WHORE! My god the cognitive dissonense of feminists is just astounding. I literally have no idea how they function in this society. ... oh wait, I forgot, affirmative action.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 05:31 AM
1

brilliantly said.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 05:29 AM
1

We do have to tolerate the views, but we don't have to act like their opinion's are valid.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 05:10 AM
2

literally all of these examples are wrong, except the one about women being chaste and men being sexual. Everything else is just wrong.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 05:40 AM
0

You're attitude is the reason why we have shit politics. People need to be able to agree to disagree. I mean hell, look at UKIP in England (a political landscape that's exciting for a libertarian homosexual like myself). Texas has threatened and almost seceded from the union for perceived threats to personal liberty, and yet an unelected appointed bureaucrat serves as president of Europe who has repeatedly told nations that they cannot hold elections, has disposed political figures and appointed…
/r/MensRights31/05/14 05:05 AM
0

Herm, well, I should add that I have very religious family (young earth creationists) that I absolutely adore, and we have friendly arguments about political things all the time. They kind of half do half don't know that I'm gay. And an atheist.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 04:44 AM
4

I'm sorry, but I can't understand how anyone could be friends with a radical feminist like this. I know we should tolerate different ideas (so long as they don't go against the liberal hivemind) but at some point you have to realize that they simply do not make good conversation and they make even worse friends.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 02:19 AM
1

Meh, my words aint be dat good.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:00 AM
8

Wow. She literally argued for treating women like children and men like adults. Proof that feminism infantalizes women, takes away their sense of agency in a reactionary traditionalist fashion. All in the name of "equality" of course.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 06:08 PM
0

the fuck are you rambling about? Seriously. The dynamic of sex being a commodity does not create serial killers. It is the dynamic of humanity being a commodity that creates serial killers. You missed the fucking point, kid. Furthermore, me pointing out how masculinity is defined in society isn't stereotyping all men. If I where to say black men are forced by society to be tough, that's not stereotyping blacks. It's drawing attention to a sociological issue. My god, you are fucking dense.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 02:32 AM
1

No, you're wrong. The dynamic of sex being a commodity doesn't produce serial killers, that's why I said you missed the fricken point. The point is that "humanity" being a commodity produces serial killers. When men have to prove that they are human beings by supporting women, being successful and having sex and when men are denied any of those it produces serial killers. You missed my point entirely. We need to treat all human beings as inherently human and full of value, rather than attaching …
/r/MensRights26/05/14 02:02 AM
-1

I think this is a violation of the rule, not linking to twitter accounts.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 02:00 AM
9

Stop mansplaining away my femformation you patriarch! (not everything has to be serious, lol)
/r/MensRights26/05/14 01:52 AM
0

We agree that reducing that act to the status of a commodity is wrong gender policing.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 01:47 AM
1

Saying that sex should or shouldn't be anything is gender policing. As it stands, however, sex behaves like a commodity. Rather, it behaves like a service. That's a fact. Without the "disfunction" (read as: political reality) sex is a social interaction. It isn't more, it isn't less, it just is. There is a psychological component and one could say that there is a mentally and biologically preferable way to experience sex without threat of disease and disorder, but that doesn't change what sex is…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 10:28 PM
1

I think you may be missing an aspect of this conversation. when one speaks of the male or female experience, it must be noted that not all men and not all women have the same experience. however, the fact that you or many people like you have not experienced an event doesn't discount be factual nature or existence of said event. furthermore, the existence of outliers to a norm does not discount the existence of said norm. If we are going to have an intelligent conversation about things, we must …
/r/MensRights25/05/14 08:30 PM
1

this is all from my un-educated perspective, but I think I can answer this question. Also understand that this is not in any way condoning rape, but this post is attempting to answer the question of how the masculine identity interacts with society and the act of rape. Isn't she absolutely correct? Yes, she is. But the problem that she has, and that most people have is that they blame men and masculinity instead of blaming the society behind this sexist stance. There are a couple of ideas that y…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 06:05 PM
1

That reminds me "How can she slap"
/r/MensRights25/05/14 12:09 AM
0

You initial analogy of "if you consent to me shooting you in the face" That analogy is similar to euthanasia. Pay attention man, fo realz.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 05:34 PM
1

Are you talking about this? Cuz yeah I don't support that and I've never met a feminist IRL or on reddit who thinks that being made to penetrate is anything less than rape. And yet every feminist and feminist organization uses these statistics to paint all men as rapists. checkmate. I totally support helping out young boys who are struggling and (again) I doubt you'd find anyone who doesn't Oh yea, feminists care -so much- about this issue that they've actively demonized masculinity to a point w…
/r/MensRights23/05/14 06:20 AM
4

I have never in my life seen someone so effectively oppression Olympics their way out of admitting male equality.
/r/MensRights23/05/14 05:58 AM
0

I wouldn't use the world ethics or morality to describe drunk people consenting. Now, is it kind of sleazy to take advantage of a drunk person? Sure. Is it something that is generally unhealthy and shouldn't happen? It has a tendency to be so, yes. Is it unethical to do so? I wouldn't say so, because there isn't an absolute ethos about it. There's no core "Actus Reas" to make it unethical. That being said, intentions can go a long way, even though the action itself isn't wrong, the intentions ca…
/r/MensRights23/05/14 05:50 AM
0

You could delete it and put up one with a more accurate title, not a click-bate lie. But keep telling yourself that it's not your fault, you're -totally- the victim here.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 01:00 AM
1

"Anarchy erupts at an anarchist meeting" You don't say?
/r/MensRights22/05/14 12:59 AM
5

Well, it isn't a problem, not because they're men, but because they -consented- We all need to be careful of tu quoquo arguments and using feminist rhetoric. If we're just going to advocate for a feminist perspective on consent and apply it to men who are intoxicated we might as well call men's rights "feminism with a dick" instead of what it should be, a valid criticism and counterpoint to mainstream feminism. The point that this video becomes a problem is after the men realized what a dumb fuc…
/r/MensRights21/05/14 11:59 PM
3

Asking someone where their from is promoting violence? Fuck man, I'm a violent individual. I thought I was just being polite. ' this is why I need feminism, to teach me when politeness is actually violence against women.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 01:04 AM
14

Yes. Fucking yes. You can sue for libel or defamation if they ever speak about it again or if she told a lot of people. If you where fired from your job you can sue for lost earning potential. If this was on any news site you can probably do the same to them, although it will be tricky because them saying "alleged" does a lot to remove any burden from them. ... that's if this was in the united states or US controlled soil, BTW. IDK what court's jurisdiction this would be if it was in the field.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 11:43 PM
7

Two words: Female Privilege.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 11:33 PM
1

Which agency decides what punishment is appropriate? congress. The best cure for actual unrealistically high confidence would be proving someone wrong, not lecturing them on how it's bad to be confident or prideful. If only the dumbfuck would admit that he's wrong. but oh well. Have a nice life.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:44 AM
2

Wow. How Orwellian can you get? Jeeze!!!
/r/MensRights15/05/14 04:20 PM
1

I view this as the courts punishment Yea, and I view the war on drugs as a form of rainbow unicorn chocolate easter bunny abuse squad. does that mean I'm right? No! And neither are you, fucktard. The president enforcing the constitution is not the courts punishing you, you twit. It is an action of the president stemming from his individual duties to protect and uphold the constitution, not from any of the courts individual powers. The supreme court is not like lower courts; it cannot issue punis…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:08 PM
5

lol and a downvote for me? top kek
/r/MensRights13/05/14 07:23 AM
7

all the butthurt in your response.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 06:30 AM
5

Well, to be quite frank, an outlier to a statistical mean doesn't really sway my view on something. The reason why we have such skewed statistics in cases of rape, wages, domestic violence, health research, rates of poverty, the affects of famine and catastrophe, (and so on and so forth) where the results depict women as the victims is because of underhanded practices initiated by, or at the very least, capitalized, used and monetized by leftist ideologues and organizations who push identity pol…
/r/MensRights12/05/14 08:12 PM
11

What statistic do you use to come to that conclusion? There are a lot of statistics out there, I'm curious about your perspective and I would like to have a conversation about it.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 07:01 PM
1

What assurances do we have that parties will remain balanced and gridlocked? Statistics. Minorities are growing, the republican base is divided and shrinking and young people are more and more progressive. I'm not sure how this differs from what I said. YOU said that "the courts will attempt to punish you if they learn of it." No. The courts won't punish you. The president will "uphold and protect" the constitution, as is his duty. It's still good to establish that in your sentence, it's easy to…
/r/MensRights12/05/14 02:33 PM
1

Well actually yes it does. For it to be reasonable self defense there has to be an immediate threat of bodily harm. when she got up and walked away, the man got up and pushed her. At that point he was continuing the altercation and it was no longer self defense. ... at least, that's how it is in the U.S.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 05:11 PM
1

ok guy, you got me. The french royalty had checks and balances too, didn't stop them from being overthrown. Wow, such history, much analogy. OK guy, you're technically right. If the united states where overthrown by radical pro lifers where hundreds of thousands of people would be killed in a 5 to 10 year reign of blood like the french revolution, then yea. Abortion could be criminalized. So you're not wrong, you're just an asshole. Incorrect, it simply means that if you do it, the courts will a…
/r/MensRights11/05/14 04:53 PM
13

I dislike this persons post, however, one individual post doesn't really affect us very much. This would fit better at /r/tumblrinaction
/r/MensRights07/05/14 05:51 PM
1

Lol NO THAT IS NOT HOW IT WORKS There are things called fukin CHECKS AND BALANCES If the supreme court says something is unconstitutional IT MEANS YOU CANT FUCKING DO IT Unless you literally amend the constitution of the united states, you CAN NOT CRIMINALIZE ABORTION An individual state would have to succeed from the union to go against the constitution. The states literally cannot criminalize abortion.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 07:09 AM
1

Nope, you're wrong. The supreme court has ruled that abortion is legal. It -cannot- be criminalized. It is unconstitutional to criminalize abortion. Just like you can't criminalize speech.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 01:02 AM
4

They couldn't have. Roe V wade made abortion legal and it was upheld several times. They tried (and I think succeeded) in cutting funding to planned parenthood though, and they may have made third trimester abortions illegal. I think that's still possible.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 02:32 AM
1

Streisand effect
/r/MensRights06/05/14 01:05 AM
4

No states have banned abortion, nor could they. It Is a legal act and states cannot criminalize it.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:43 PM
10

The argument that men should be able to "abort" their financial responsibility comes from the right to property and personal agency. In the same way that women shouldn't have their bodies spoiled by a forced pregnancy, having their bodily agency taken away from them, men shouldn't have their bodily agency taken from them when they're thrown into jail for not paying child support, even if they never wanted the child in the first place. Men face the same type of breach of agency that women do, alb…
/r/MensRights03/05/14 11:53 PM
1

I can understand where your coming from. And I agree. I just don't think the other side would ever agree with you, which is another reason why I'm against feminism: feminism is against me.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 07:09 PM
1

We can be polite and civil with an approachable attitude and be anti feminist. Its an earmark of a totalitarian enterprise that doesn't accept criticism. We can be anti feminist without being anti equality or anti woman. If liberals and feminists refuse to accept criticism, they'll look like the frauds and divisive ideologues many of them are. Edit: it also doesn't matter that we're on thin ice being pro male is the same as being anti female to most feminists, again, the facist "with us or again…
/r/MensRights01/05/14 05:30 PM
1

There are also TERFS (idk what it means) radical feminists who believe MtF trans people are trying to invade female spaces and defile women. Feminists depict homophobia as displaced misogyny, a laughable a concept as it is harmful, placing gay liberation at the fag-end of women's liberation. I support women's right to vote, and yet the responsibilities associated with it, the draft remains a singularly male experience. Not to mention the fact that most sufferagets where prohibitionists. and lets…
/r/MensRights01/05/14 04:15 PM
1

I would disagree with you that it is selection bias. One of the United States quotes a 1 in 5 statistics and 77 cents on the dollar, both false, that isn't selection bias. Its a statistical trend.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 02:29 PM
3

time.com/30545/its-time-to-end-rape-culture-hysteria/
/r/MensRights01/05/14 01:22 PM
1

I'm trying to defend a non person? As in, the child on the womb? What you don't get is that, actually, it is -very- necessary. this is the only way we have now for homosexual couples to have biological offspring. In cases of infirtility of heterosexual couples are you against a sperm or egg-doner being used? Because that is exactly what is happening with these people, just that the wgg doner has to carry it to term. And if someone agrees to donate their egg or sperm, can they be said to be harme…
/r/MensRights01/05/14 01:13 PM
1

create a human being without a parent (on purpose). Why don't you view the homosexual parents as legitimate parents? The child isn't being hurt at all, he's getting two parents that want a child. Yes there's the biological parent, but just because it's in vitro doesn't mean the biological parent is left out. you're complaining about a non-issue, and you sound homophobic. You might not be, but it's very easy to view it that way.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 03:14 AM
1

Well, you should be happy that you have more than two parties to choose from! Although feminists do control your country. Any updates on that human rights violation case in the Hague yet?
/r/MensRights01/05/14 02:53 AM
1

Adoptiones helps society as a whole. It helps an already existing child, and help a loving parent. Are you saying that homosexual parents who do in vitro aren't loving parents? Are you saying children that are given up for adoptions are more deserving of loving parents than children born in vitro? Heterosexual people having accidents doesn't mean homosexual people have to do the same conciously. You're insinuating homosexual couples wanting to have a child is a mistake? This is not about the par…
/r/MensRights01/05/14 02:35 AM
1

Studies have shown that having two fathers or two mothers is just as good as heterosexual parents, even better because homosexual parents have to want to be parents
/r/MensRights01/05/14 02:00 AM
1

This is an incredibly Ill educated opinion. If a child is an accessory with in vitro, how is a child -not- an accessory in an adoption? Also, straight people produce children as a by product of "amusement", mostly on accident, shortly followed by a shotgun wedding. You're holding homosexual's to a higher standard than straight people, despite the fact that homosexuals have to consciously decide to have children and want to raise them, not just marry after the condom breaks.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 01:58 AM
1

I don’t think we can compare a surrogate mother to a sperm donor,” he said. “The third party who is a sperm donor, his contribution is 10 seconds." Ten seconds? You must have a really shitty sex life. The surrogate mother’s contribution is nine months and it raises fundamental ethical questions about the exploitation of women’s bodies, about possible commodification of children, about the right of a child to know his origins.” yes, the child has a right to know their origin, so long as by origin…
/r/MensRights01/05/14 01:56 AM
1

Woa, really? I've heard some great things about CAFE and other organizations.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 01:27 AM
12

Ok, feminism's GOALS aren't wrong. But all of their political goals are tainted by sexism against men. And most of their organizations have said and done things harmful to men. Except RAINN. RAINN has recently come out against rape hysteria and the degradation of due process in universities.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 01:24 AM
0

Why do you dislike Jeb Bush? Other than his connection with Georgie, he seems pretty moderate to me.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 01:20 AM
1

I'm guessing your country is spain?
/r/MensRights01/05/14 01:19 AM
2

Internet is a difficult medium to measure tone. Especially when srsers have espoused the opinion that I percieved from you. Either way, sorry for my over reaction.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 12:22 AM
7

have you ever considered that you're wrong and stupid? women report becoming lubricated while being raped and even having orgasms. Does that mean they're suddenly consenting because their body enjoys what they are biologically driven to enjoy? No. Same thing with erections. it's disgustingly sexist that you hold these views. You need to rethink them.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 07:27 PM
1

But our self worth is measured that way. Confidence doesn't come from within, and anyone telling you that is feeding you grade a bullshit. Confidence comes from completing life goals consistently and gaining validation. You simply can't validate yourself because validation is an external source. And you're right, you shouldn't kill yourself, but you should also understand why people do kill themselves. Edit: in this case, and by that I mean in american culture it really is a woman thing. A littl…
/r/MensRights30/04/14 04:08 PM
1

Hey! I'm not you're guy, pal! Passive aggressive narcissistic douche. Seriously, yourinability to accept criticism is the exact reason I hate liberals. "He doesnt think exactly like me? That poopy head" And I'm the one who needs to grow up. Totally.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 10:23 PM
1

In some jurisdictions, no. That's what escort services are for. Source; I had a couple internet friends who where escorts. Really cute guy, really bad sob story.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 04:14 PM
6

You've no idea how people attain self worth, do you? Possessions don't define you as a person, but they're like a trophy rack where you put all your nice things. Especially when these trophies are also helping your family, providing for their luxury and care. So imagine that you worked all your life to get all these nice trophies. a nice house, a nice car, a good life insurance plan, ect, and your wife decides to elope with the guy across the street. She takes all of your trophies, splits the re…
/r/MensRights29/04/14 04:01 PM
1

That doesn't sound like what I heard. This might have been a different Scandinavian country, but it was my understanding that the primary parent of the child is assumed to be the mother, and she has to sign off on the father being co-parent.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 03:54 PM
0

Like I said, you have the freedom to say what you want in private property, and whoever owns the property can kick you out. However, saying naughty words around children can get you a ticket and a fine, depending on the state/county your in. But speaking about free speech in universities, any kind of censorship is negative if it encroaches on someone's personal liberty, and without a reasonable need for it, censorship is wrong, period. schools have the power to do these things, but they would be…
/r/MensRights29/04/14 02:32 AM
1

Well, studies have shown that allowing abortions decreases the crime rate. I'm also for legalized euthanasia and decriminalized suicide, but that's another argument. I think I may have mixed up my conservative pundits and the catch-phrases they've spouted. There was a republican who said something similar to what I'm speaking about, but I can't remember who and I don't care enough to google for it xP.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 02:26 AM
-1

Yea, just like Stalinists love a free press! Unless you say anything bad about the regime. Listen bud, I'm far from conservative, but truth is I'm not slinging mud at liberals. I'm simply pointing out the shit already on them.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 02:21 AM
1

Fair enough. It's funny to see how easily MRA's are prone to accepting when they're wrong, but feminist types are incapable of that level of thought.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 09:46 PM
0

I can understand if you're using Cisgender as a place-holder for a better word, and I can understand that it does have it's worth. However, Calling someone Cisgender, even if they are technically cisgender, is incredibly insulting, considering the climate that the word lives in. I'm sure if I where in /r/LGBT i would be lambasted for "caring about those icky cis-feelings more about the important trans-feelings", because transgendered people are more important than cis people... which is a part o…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 09:43 PM
1

What if someone called you a queer, instead of transgender? Wouldn't that be offensive? what about gender? What if someone called you a he, and you self identify as a woman? They're not forcing you to self identify as a man, but if you went to the doctor they'd call you male the whole time, because that's what you are, right?
/r/MensRights28/04/14 09:26 PM
-1

something to say?
/r/MensRights28/04/14 09:23 PM
3

You have it exactly opposite. the N-word used to mean a black person. It's only recently that it's transformed to mean an "ignorant person". That's why racial terms are racist, but gendered terms that can be applied to both men and women aren't sexist. If negro was a term that could historically apply to anyone of any race then it'd be a different story. Which... it arguably is morphing into.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 09:23 PM
1

But. It is. Or medical insurance wouldn't cover its treatment. Ah yes, so pregnancy is a disease too? I guess sex is also a desiease, since we have health-care that would cover bonerpills and contraception? what about obesity? Insurance doesn't cover liposuction or gym memberships, but isn't obesity a disease? I guess I can understand what you're saying, but I think that the way you're saying it is really calloused to transgendered people. I would also say that, to be categorized as an illness, …
/r/MensRights28/04/14 09:19 PM
2

I think you may have struck the root of this issue; there are a number of different jargon and political uses for the word "liberal" and the word "feminism." An example of the reactionary form of politics I would speak to that I have readily available is the "77 cents on the dollar" quote which has been flung about needlessly. Anyone who tries to argue that this quote is a fabrication is instantly labeled a misogynist. I can also give an example of a republican leader who said that women who are…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 07:56 PM
2

Well, ok, so if you want to actually talk about this, or just accuse people of bigotry? I mean that as an honest question, because this is an interesting moral aspect to me. Also, because you're not an American you probably don't understand our political structure, as "liberal" and "conservative" are contextual to the political structure they're used in. There are some people that are deserving of hate, via their actions. Beliefs, race, creed and ethnicity wont make someone deserving of it, but …
/r/MensRights28/04/14 07:09 PM
-1

Yea, but hay, "all animals are equal, some are just more equal than others". Fuck, I hate liberals... I mean, conservatives are shit, but liberals are worse, because they're supposed to fight this reactionary bullshit.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:44 PM
2

I was just sharing my opinion. You shouldn't read too much into it.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:42 PM
2

Well thing is, this treatment of gays as second class by women and feminists isn't just in these ultra radical areas. One of the reasons I despise feminism is the way they try and cobble a relationship between homophobia and misogyny. "Don't worry little gay dude, the hate your getting is just because those evil men hate women so much! Oh, you where beat up, fired from your job, denied housing and discriminated against because of your sexuality? Women are the -REAL- victims here." My god, that i…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:41 PM
-1

mental disorder free Implying being transgender is a mental disorder, good on ya braw
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:25 PM
-1

The honest truth is that more conversation with the lgbt community won't help because most of them are bluepilled anti male hate filled cunts. As a gay man, this is why I stay clear of the lgbt community. "Die cis scum" is used as a rallying cry for fucks sake, just like "kill all men."
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:21 PM
5

Man up is an offensive term that implies men are disposable and lack emotions. Men being unable to express emotions causes a high rate of violence and suicide. I'm thinking you don't really know what gender equality is about. Advocating for traditional gender roles is not what were about, and you're a huge tool if you think traditional masculinity is positive for men, and not in reality a noose that the state uses to bully men into compliance. Its ok to be masculine, but enforcing masculinity on…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:07 PM
3

Yea man, I fucking hate fags and their Harley Davidson's... they ruined my thursday brunch at a public gazebo with my bff!
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:02 PM
9

Well, you actually do. Its just that you might not be on that private property for long. Anyway, treating university spaces like an old man's lawn, being exclusive and censoring thought is generally bad for an educated populace. Then again, liberals only value education if it teaches kids to think just like them.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:55 PM
4

I like your schpeil , guy, but I'm not a visitor from the other camp. How privilege is used by feminists doesn't detract its usefulness in describing some social Interactions. The problem isn't the word, its the assumption of a binary, Marxist application. Just because men are privileged in some situations doesn't mean they are privileged in all situations, and vice versa.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:50 PM
1

Just learned a new word? Mist be exciting.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:44 PM
27

I personally subscribe to the hypo/hyper agency model. Women are always seen as valuable children with low agency, and men are always seen as disposable adults with high agency. Not sure why I'm getting flack for it, but meh.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:44 AM
3

"Your either with us, or your with the terrorists" Its amazing how much feminist resemble fascists.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:15 AM
0

Well, sometime women should be aware of their privilege, just like men should be aware of their privilege. Being socially aware is the first step to changing the wrongs in society.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 03:47 AM
3

I'm not a hug fan either, but I'll shake your hand. :P BTW, equality has to have a benchmark. I mean, are we fighting for equality with dogs or what? Men don't have equality in this particular metric so an "us VS them" showcase is the perfect way to show how men deserve equality in this metric.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 03:46 AM
0

You know, I think they actually have something here. I mean, the wage gap would just DISAPPEAR If women worked as much as men. well actually, it would be around 95 cents on the dollar. There's still about 5% of pay that is unaccounted for by variables other than discrimination.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 03:30 AM
1

Well, actually you're wrong. Sex is determined by biology, gender identity is largely cultural, sexuality has biological factors and it's possible that being transgender does too.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 03:15 AM
1

and good riddance. I was willing to have a conversation, but not listen to your "words of wisdom". Next time you wanna win people over to your cultish mindset, don't behave like a stuck up know it all cunt.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 02:47 AM
1

i'm dodging your questions because they aren't relevant my point TIL that asking someone to apply their idiotic logic to other hypothetical situations "isn't relevant to your point" feminist logic My god you have no idea what you're talking about. that taking advantage of someone who is drunk is rape. No. No it's not. Rape is a legal term, not an emotional or moral term. Is it morally unkosher? Sure, personally I think all sex outside of a relationship isn't morally kosher. But is it illegal? No…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 02:35 AM
1

Legally speaking, "too drunk to consent" is only if they where given drugs against their will or of they are incapable of responding in a coherent manner. Morally speaking, is it kosher? I don't think so. But the reason that we have this legal standard is this question; if they're both intoxicated and have sex, who raped who? Did they consentually rape each other? No, that's ridiculous. Which is why, If you -can- say yes, then legally you can consent to sex, period. this ruling (in universities …
/r/MensRights28/04/14 01:57 AM
1

Also, good job at dodging every question I asked you. Might you be an ignorant small minded fuckwad? Yes, methinks you are.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 01:04 AM
1

Your focus on denying that people have the responsibility to give and deny their consent Is the epitome of rape hysteria. The alleged perpetrator has the responsibility to obtain consent, not to be a fucking mind reader. Furthermore, your denial that women posses the agency to give consent is the epitome of chauvinism. You are literally arguing that we should treat all women like children with men responsible for their care-taking. You are a reactionary traditionalist, not a revolutionary.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 12:57 AM
1

First off, men are just as capable of being man hating gynocrats. but that's not what were talking about Yea, good job dodging the question. Makes it easy to protect your delicate sensibilities when you selectively apply your morality, Huh? lets frame the question a little differently to see how you respond, I'm not sure if your entirely a concern troll. The question at hand is if people who are intoxicated have the legal and moral responsibility over their actions. So if someone gets drunk and …
/r/MensRights27/04/14 11:36 PM
1

What, did you look in the mirror? Oh, silly you, cunt isn't bad to say cus men can be cunts too. Just so happens you're a fragile cunt, with delicate, conservative, almost traditionalist sensibilities. You've a lot in common with republicans. Btw, "ding ding ding"? What are you, a fuckin kindergardener? (Oh no I guess I'm am ageist too)
/r/MensRights27/04/14 11:22 PM
1

Looks like they did respond, just enough to be a stupid cunt.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 07:59 PM
1

Feminism does not encourage woman on boy pedophilia nor condone lighter sentences on women committing the exact same crimes. Feminist organizations have actively promoted a diologue on domestic violence and rape that excludes male victims. Feminist professors have actively condoned and excused actions of female pedophiles, and received no backlash. Feminist ideologues have actively promoted a definition of due process in universities that promotes false accusations of rape. Feminist politicians …
/r/MensRights27/04/14 07:22 PM
1

What you don't understand is this; Feminism didn't cause this sexist society. However, feminism has capitalized on it in the name of "equality" and ignored male issues, such as the one portrayed here.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 07:02 PM
4

A homeless person comes up to you and asks for money. Your boyfriend comes up to you and asks for sex. You say no. They bug you, telling you some sob story of how they have blueballs/cancer. After a while, you decide to just give in because you don't want to argue. Maybe you're afraid of violence because you're an irrational, psychotic, paranoid person. You go to the police afterwards and say "I was robbed/raped!" You're right, it is pretty fucking stupid. Sad how accurate it is. That's why her …
/r/MensRights27/04/14 06:48 PM
2

Almost Freudian, in fact. Almost like she wants a replacement for some absent father figure.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 06:44 PM
1

or suggest in person or online that someone should start going to the gym TIL, giving someone good advice and caring about their health is considered oppression. Feminist logic.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 06:35 PM
1

Are you accusing Steampunk_moustache of being American? Man, it's good when everyone can recognize how freedom you are over the internet.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 06:31 PM
3

so to speak for woman's experience of harassment, or fear of rape is solipsism itself. You don't know the definition of solipsism. Solipsism is (generally) the belief that one's own viewpoint is the only valid or real viewpoint (or that one's own mind is the only thing that is sure to exist) Saying that "I can understand women's viewpoint" is literally the opposite. It's recognizing someone's viewpoint as valid, empathizing with them and attempting to connect with them. You saying that "Nobody c…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 06:24 PM
3

Replace all instances of "men" with "Blacks" in the blog and in these comments. It's funny how the feminists sound like racist cunts, huh?
/r/MensRights27/04/14 06:19 PM
3

TIL women don't have the ability to make decisions for themselves, so even if they say "yes" to rape(because all sex is rape), as a man, you've probably just raped her. feminist logic. Sounds like you're a chauvinistic pig.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 06:18 PM
2

Did you ever think though that with the argument came the threat of violent rape? Because all men are rapists, huh? Telling a man no means he's gunna rape her! Try replacing men with "black men" in your statement, see how racist you look.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 06:17 PM
5

their ability to consent is questionable. .... So what you're saying is you want women to be treated like mentally retarded people? Or like children? If a man and a woman are both drunk and have sex, are they raping each other? Answer: No, because that's fucking stupid! Everyone who is concious has the ability to consent. And guess what? In a democratic society, we collectively decide what constitutes rape, so yes we do get to decide. I'm just glad there are more of us and less of you.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 06:15 PM
3

I decided I wasn’t actually in the mood to have sex. But I faked orgasms because i didn't want to argue about it She didn't want to have sex, but said yes to it anyway. That isn't rape, that's her not having the self control to say no. If I give a dollar to a homeless person, can I go back and say I was robbed because "I didn't feel like it"? No, because that would be fucking retarded
/r/MensRights27/04/14 06:12 PM
0

preconceived MRA beliefs would ever accept. .... Or anyone with even the lightest understanding of due process rights. There are countless examples of these star chamber accusations in universities ruining the lives of male students on trumped up charges and "he said she said" evidence. There are also many examples of men who where convicted in their university but the police chose not to prosecute or even said, flat out that it was a false rape accusation. So if by "MRA beliefs" you mean "Commo…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 05:53 PM
2

It's mostly a cultural thing. My brother found this wonderful chilean woman who is just... well... amazing! she is just amazing. And there are women who don't share the cultural beliefs of most women in the west. so I disagree about the "all women are one way" thing. But, when it comes to marriage, I honestly don't know why anyone would want to get married anymore.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 05:41 PM
2

Because I'm stating the fact that men cannot know what female experiences are, you are accusing me of supporting that program. Women don't have a common "experience." Women in different economic strata and cultures have vastly different experiences. Just like men don't have a common "expereince". There are some common experiences that are shared with some men and women, And, It is possible for someone who doesn't live through this experience to understand it. Not everyone practices solipsism, as…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 05:39 PM
1

You're right, it's not the feminist fault we live in a society that is sexist against men. But it is feminists fault that they have ignored male issues and capitalized on internalized fear of men and the disposibility of men.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 05:34 PM
6

Also if you read farther on to that wikipedia reference, it says that "The bill, however, was dismissed at the end of the 111th Congress session." So no, we still have a male only draft. looks like you're... ignorant beyond all reason yet again! Go back to your echo chamber, your opinions are stupid.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 01:47 AM
8

Women did not create the draft, or the rules that bar women from being eligible for it, Neither did men. Excuse me, -most- men. Saying that "Women didn't create the draft so lol fuck you guys, patriarchy is backfiring" Is victim blaming to a key. It's also you being a calloused stupid cunt. A select few privileged men created the law that enacts sexist standards for enforced military service. This sexism benefits women and harms men. The grand majority of all men have been harmed by sexist attit…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 01:45 AM
6

I'm saying that neither men nor women can dictate what the others experiences are. You say out of one side of your mouth, while defending a program that attempts to dictate to everyone what the "Female experience" is. You realize now that you're being a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 01:38 AM
0

Also, women don't have a quote limited capacity quote. You literally just advocated for treating women as if they are mentally challenged.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 10:59 PM
1

Welp, the flaw in both your criticism of both my argument and my person is a blatant ignorance of the rules of causation. This is basic, like, "object permanency" basic, so it may be that you want people to be treated like children because you have the mind of one. But enough ad hominem, lets get on with it. A) sexual partners have the responsibility to obtain consent, which means that for purposes of clarity people have a responsibility to inform people of their state of consent, just like peop…
/r/MensRights26/04/14 10:55 PM
3

Wrong and immoral? Maybe. Rape? No, and for good reason. When someone is drunk driving, are they still as responsible for the deaths they cause if they where sober? You're obviously a chauvinist, wanting all women to be treated like adult children, not responsible for their choices. Real feminists would be sickened by this, but frankly those don't exist anymore. Just cunts.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 10:05 PM
1

And yet a man who is intoxicated is free game, eh? What if they where both drunk, did they rape each other? I bet you're totally -not- a sexist hypocrite.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 10:00 PM
1

excessively zealous and unquestioning commitment to a belief system? That's #1, you dirty cultist!
/r/MensRights26/04/14 03:13 AM
1

But name calling is the funnest part!
/r/MensRights25/04/14 08:30 PM
1

And according to other studies, "pestering for a kiss" is the same as rape. Ill bet you similar shenanigans are at play here.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 08:29 PM
1

Georgie also admits that its an outdated stereotype.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 05:40 PM
1

But Georgie admits its an outdated stereorype. So he's not supporting the sexism, just posting a funny picture
/r/MensRights25/04/14 05:39 PM
3

Oh come now, not all gay people are feminist liberals. Fuck knows I'm not one. Besides, in his post he admits that its an outdated stereotype. And with a voice like his how can you be mad at him?
/r/MensRights25/04/14 05:38 PM
1

Yes I do. But that just makes my point even stronger. When the "evil misogynistic patriarchy" was in control women where protected and survived at an incredibly higher rate during disasters. Even today women have about five more years to life expectancy and are about 10% of workplace deaths. Some Feminists are fucking nuts Edit: btw, welcome to mensrights. I know you and your amr buddies love being snarky egotistical cunts, and sometimes with good reason. You should probably look past your hubri…
/r/MensRights25/04/14 05:16 PM
3

This isn't a rape joke. This is revenge porn.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 03:24 AM
1

This is also, btw, completely fucking nuts. women survived at an incredibly higher rate than men on the titanic. Even women in the third class survived at a rate of, I think like 40. Men across all demographics where less than 10%. (If my memory serves me correctly, numbers might be off.)
/r/MensRights25/04/14 02:58 AM
2

... dude, that's incredibly douchy of you. Neither of us know what really happened, but she testifies that he held her down and bruised her wrists. She asked him to get a condom after he started touching her. Read the whole article before trying to argue rape hysteria.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 01:48 PM
0

"hate to say it" you should rephrase that, it sounds really callous.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 01:45 PM
2

One: men and women are at the same level of value. While it is true that there are biological differences between us, this doesn't make one better or less than the other. Two: While it is also true that men and women have different neuro-nets (I think that's the jargon for them, but idk I'm not a scientist) which may give women and men different proclivities, this doesn't mean that women and men can't have the same potential. three: Men have more -varied- intelligence, meaning there are more ret…
/r/MensRights23/04/14 07:29 AM
1

Well, I can actually understand them getting upset. I think it was exacerbated by a sense of hivemind and a radical shift in ideology, however she is simply wrong about the statistical facts. Homosexual parents are actually more likely to be better parents, because they have to want to be parents to have kids. Heterosexuals just have to be drunk, or forget to take a pill.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 05:46 AM
6

The facts that she states, though, simply aren't true. there's a lot of evidence that homosexual couples do just as good at raising kids as heterosexuals, even better because gay couples have to want kids to have them.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 05:42 AM
2

Well, I gotta tell you, I absolutely loved this professor right up until she answered that question. Because... well, she's absolutely wrong. In fact, all of the studies have shown that homosexual parents do just as well as heterosexual parents, in fact, even better in most situations, because they planned to become parents while breeders have kids as accidents and then feel some subconscious hate for them throughout their lives for being a burden. So, I'd have to say that she's incredibly wrong…
/r/MensRights23/04/14 05:41 AM
6

this has nothing to do with men's rights. Or excuse me, it has very little to do with it. Either way, cool story bro.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 06:49 PM
2

Anonymous isn't a thing. It's not a group of neckbeard fedora tippers who gather in their mom's basement to hack into japanese loli porn databases. It's a group of people on several irc chat rings and websites who subscribe to a lifestyle and identity that like to call themselves Anonymous. It's basically the same thing as calling yourself an anarchist.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 12:59 AM
1

Well I guess I'm wrong :P oh well.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 07:32 AM
1

Well, there are other male sterilizations that are reversible, like they can just shoot a gel in the tube and then unblock it later. but, wtv, i'm not a doctor :P
/r/MensRights14/04/14 07:24 AM
-1

Ah, must have missed that part. I'm not a doctor so I wouldn't know, however elective surgeries fall in a weird medical and legal gray area so I can understand why the doctor would be trepidations about a new procedure that's fairly untested. I just don't think we should cry "sexism" like the boy who cried wolf, makes us look like radfems.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 11:34 PM
0

Yea totally, I mean it's not like it's a simple medical fact that a vasectomy is way fucking easier to do than tying fallopian tubes. I mean, cutting open a womb with a large surgical incision under anesthetics, or doing a tiny snip to a small tube in your sack with less than an inch incision, totally the same with the same medical concerns. Yep, everything is sexism.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 11:28 PM
0

Well, there are some sterilization procedures for men that are reversible. I just don't remember much from my sex ed classes.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 11:26 PM
-2

How many accounts did you make? lol
/r/MensRights13/04/14 07:02 PM
4

Well, it's not necessarily sexist when it's based on provable medical data. Vasectomy's aren't dangerous to a man's health, and they're reversible, while dealing with a woman's uterus is... well, a big ordeal usually with a lot of cutting involved.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 06:58 PM
-2

Well, it's actually a lot easier and simpler of a procedure to get a vasectomy. I think the reason the doctor wants your girlfriend to wait is due to hormonal reasons; she's close to menopause, something like that. If not? Dude, find another doctor. But yea, vasectomy's are really easy and medically harmless, and reversible (I think)
/r/MensRights13/04/14 06:55 PM
1

Good job dodging anything I said and shoving your head in the sand. I guess being an "ubermensch" is really similar to being a douch, eh? Just because you don't understand the complexity of human life doesn't mean we're simple. Just because you don't understand morality doesn't mean it doesn't exist. And here's a tip; many moralities are based off of scientific ideas and provable observations. "homosexuality is wrong because the bible says" - ipsie dixit, provably wrong. "Being sexually promiscu…
/r/MensRights13/04/14 06:50 PM
1

Oh really? Creationism is wrong. Right? if I where to say "1+1=5" I would be wrong, wouldn't I? Maliciously raping a 5 year old and eating their dead corps is wrong, isn't it? It has a bad affect on the individual perpetrating the wrong, the individual receiving the wrong and society at large, it is provably wrong. We aren't just sacks of carbon, we're an intricate life-form with needs, desires, goals, wants, dreams and aspirations. There are some things that are right, and some things that are …
/r/MensRights13/04/14 06:21 PM
2

... there's no correct response to emotional stimuli. If you want to cry about it you can, in fact crying can be very helpful. Men are emotional creatures just like women. Or, not exactly equal but similar. Men should be able to show it, and they have a good point that a lot of the reasons behind male issues is society pressuring men to "man up" I want to see this video before I condemn it.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 04:36 AM
1

1) You where glad it was done but made a snide comment about her deserving more and then doubled down when your view was proven factually wrong? Uhuh... 2) Bullshit morality is inherently subjective. Morality is inherently contextual. But it's not fucking subjective, that's absolute hogwash. There is a stupid hypocrisy in that belief. If morality is subjective, then it doesn't matter what you do, so why should we believe that feminism is wrong? Moreover, why do -you- believe feminism is wrong if…
/r/MensRights13/04/14 01:29 AM
1

and you are patently wrong. Just because there is one injustice somewhere doesn't mean that injustice is the norm. Also you acting like this is an outrage that she wasn't given a judgement that would have violated our constitution is laughable, stupendously immoral and the mark of someone who doesn't understand law, and perhaps morality itself.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 10:31 PM
1

Huh. Well it wouldn't be the first time a state did something unconstitutional. But still, are you arguing that we should upend the fabric of American law and kill this woman just to feel that she received "equality?" because that's... being stupid.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 10:08 PM
2

There's a place where you can send an e-mail to this person in their profile. I suggest we all send one to him, NO RAPE OR DEATH THREATS, telling him how much of a fucking idiot he is.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 08:59 PM
1

"but Texas does so regularly" Citation? The supreme court has firmly ruled that the execution of minors or crimes committed as minors is unconstitutional.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 08:49 PM
1

You're right that sometimes prosecutors don't apply this law when they could otherwise apply it, however this is a case where prosecutors couldn't apply the law even if they wanted to. She simply did not commit capital murder as understood by the laws of the state of Texas. I know you guys like to see misandry in every corner but sometimes you're just being... well.... victims.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 07:18 PM
2

That's not actually true. Capital punishment is something that can only be applied in a number of cases, particularly the murder of children, police officers and murder while committing a burglary. A crime of passion or simply premeditated murder isn't enough to get you capital punishment in Texas. And I mean that by law. Literally, in Texas there is a specific criminal code that defines what "Capital Murder" can be and what would qualify one to have committed it. Her killing was gruesome, but i…
/r/MensRights12/04/14 03:31 AM
1

Well, yes, a small minority of people are born with mutated sex genes. But a small minority of people are also born without limbs. Really quickly; I'm not talking about transsexualism, which is probably prenatal in nature and doesn't involve genetic definitions. Being transsexual is a valid experience. Plainly put, people who are born without limbs are not a new species of human, they are human, born without limbs. People who are born with intersex genes are not a new gender, they are not a new …
/r/MensRights03/04/14 02:59 AM
1

He did mention the underlying mental health issues of men, which is really good on him. Anyone trying to say that Patric Stewart is anti-man and deserves to be jettisoned out an air-lock.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 04:20 AM
6

Well, Here's the rub; A person who is able to take on more hazardous work should get more pay. Men often choose to do the dangerous and labor intensive jobs, construction, underwater welder, military, ect and because of the extra risks they take on they should recieve extra pay. Women simply don't make the same career decisions as men. Now, there is a question as to why women don't make these decisions, and it either comes down to a biological argument (women simply are not as physically strong …
/r/MensRights30/03/14 08:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter