TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Psybur Archive

View 0 posts and 155 comments by Psybur on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

"hate" Wow, the fountain of stupidity runneth over
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/22 12:02 AM
1

I've stopped doing both, so I suppose I'm a living example to the contrary
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/22 10:26 PM
2

It's not extreme nor an overreaction. It's a natural consequence of ever-increasing female standards and insufferable feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/22 10:25 PM
1

Happening in Japan and other Asian countries, as well
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/22 10:22 PM
1

"hard labor" topkek
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/22 09:57 PM
1

This is some some plutonium-grade projection right here
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/22 09:56 PM
1

This isn't true. Women who make more because they "pursue their own future" demand more because they believe they deserve it through their efforts. It's Hypergamy 101.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/22 09:45 PM
3

The self-reporting in this thread is insane
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/22 09:23 PM
1

If it fucks up the relationship, the woman was a worthless walking red flag anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/22 09:21 PM
1

You do know that DNA tests don't need needles, right? You conjured up a false situation to defend a garbage position
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/22 09:19 PM
1

Well, science supports natural immunity, soo....
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/22 03:15 PM
0

The uber feminists are usually packed in large cities where that propaganda is pushed on everyone
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 09:08 PM
1

"Trust science" You mean Fauci?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 09:07 PM
1

It's the same garbage women say when they say "he doesn't need to have money, he just needs to be ambitious". Same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 09:01 PM
0

At the expense of men, no less
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 08:56 PM
0

Source? Cause that reeks of all kinds of BS
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 08:50 PM
1

That is a terrible assumption to make and it's safe to say you're not the only woman who thinks like this. No wonder women keep picking guys they end up complaining about later.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 08:11 PM
3

Women leave men at a vastly higher rate than men. "Nobody wants to deal with heartbreak" doesn't mean anything when it's overwhelmingly one side that leaves the other
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 08:06 PM
2

Ironic considering that "human decency" is all women expect to provide for the benefit of our money and protection
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 08:04 PM
0

This is a fantastic question. She should be working.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 07:50 PM
-1

What makes you think you "deserve help" for being attractive? If you expect him to put the money he works for towards you, he literally is doing you a favor.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/22 07:46 PM
1

Oh, so you think you're the arbiter of what a "real" man and woman are? You're a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 02:34 PM
2

Only if women offer it to the wrong man.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 05:37 PM
1

Uhh...Dudes are dating these women less and less, much to their vocalized chagrin. Aging women are not quiet about this issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 05:37 PM
1

Bumble doesn't represent societal expectations.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 05:05 PM
1

Preconceived? Nah, it's very much being "conceived" it right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 05:00 PM
1

It's not a dealbreaker as long as she doesn't give me shit over something I may not want to do in bed.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 04:56 PM
1

It's only okay if the same person would usually also say "if she wanted to, she would." The onus is usually placed on men, but we're equals now.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 04:41 PM
1

They're asking you to cover them cause they're reloading.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 04:34 PM
1

"Real man" Like some feminist broad knows what a "real man" is. Why don't you act like a "real woman" and shut up?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 04:22 PM
3

Are you a lobotomy patient? Men in the 50s and 60s weren't buying their 14 year old wives at 23. You're living in some fairytale land sold to you by Twitter.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 04:20 PM
1

Women have spent the past 50-75 years disrespecting men and it has only been amplified 100 -fold over the 2010s. Women have lost their claim to being respected just for being women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 04:16 PM
-2

Men absolutely used to do that until all women offered us was casual dating and sex. Hell, women spent the last 15-20 years very purposely cultivating the dating market to be that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 04:09 PM
1

This is just penis envy with extra steps.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 04:04 PM
2

Yes, it matters that much, but mostly you just have to not be fat, which isn't hard if you don't shovel food into your face faster than you burn it off.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 03:59 PM
-1

It's almost like the stuff men have been saying about the wall since time immemorial is, I dunno....ACTUALLY TRUE!?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 03:56 PM
2

If something is overinflated, you deflate it appropriately.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 03:49 PM
3

Put the expectation of pursuing partners on women. The amount of people in relationships would skyrocket.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 03:46 PM
0

You're pretty spot on with this, actually. We're bad at BSing cause most of us don't spend our entire lives practicing forms of manipulation such as makeup
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 03:44 PM
4

So, the only people that have been studied are the sample size they chose. You can't "repeatedly" show the number to be small if you ignore the people it's actually happening to. That's like me having a bowl of M&Ms that are 50% poison, most are at the bottom of the bowl, me grabbing a handful that only contains maybe 10% of poisoned ones, and then touting that only 10% of M&Ms in the bowl are poisoned when in reality, I just didn't look hard enough.
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 07:09 PM
5

I've been falsely accused and nobody has surveyed me for a damn thing. So, does my situation not count cause it wasn't put to paper? I don't give a damn about these "studies" if they aren't representative of reality
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 06:46 PM
4

The ones that are brought to court, sure. But a false allegation is still a false allegation whether or not the government gets involved. Many times it's social ramifications rather than legal ones, and those can be just as damaging.
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 06:28 PM
0

Abortion was never a constitutional right, child.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/22 04:22 PM
3

You must be ESL if you don't know what subjective means. Your response only shows you missed the point entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 04:54 AM
1

A ride or die wife with a man that doesn't already have money she is already extorting? A fantasy and nothing more.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 04:53 AM
13

Most men don't want model-tier women. Most men would take a feminine, loyal, cooperative, cute, and friendly 6 over a pretty and entitled 9-10. Men don't ask for perfection, we ask for peace. It's women who ask for things that consume resources that aren't spent by the same woman in return. You can't even compare the two without being disingenuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 04:30 AM
1

Hive mind, collectivists, same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 04:25 AM
3

Women, absolutely. They have significantly more opportunities to do so thrown at them, and loyalty is not a virtue that is championed by women in the public sphere anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 04:24 AM
1

"It's incorrect and my source is that I made it the fuck up"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 04:23 AM
2

As long as women expect us men to spend our money on them, they are commodities. If you can be bought, you are a product.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 04:22 AM
1

Most likely a beta provider, and it just makes me a little sad inside for the poor guy
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 04:20 AM
1

Good question. There is no point!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 04:18 AM
1

The Fugu fish is a better analogy
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 04:17 AM
1

True, because fewer and fewer women will be able to get husbands!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 04:14 AM
3

Hey now, some of us are single by choice. Been going MGTOW monk mode strong for years!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 04:10 AM
14

Then explain the women who won't date a man who makes less money than they do
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 04:05 AM
3

"Quality" Y'all are really out here using subjective words like they are objective standards to live up to. SMH
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 04:04 AM
1

If doesn't matter what you think is the epitome of all rights. It's right we have, whether you like it or not, sweetheart. And the freedom of speech already covers things like making threats, so you're not even saying anything relevant. And yeah, it did strike a chord if you think rights should be infringed because someone said something you don't like. Perhaps you should have your rights stripped, cause you obviously don't deserve them. And finally, I have never threatened to rape anyone. You'r…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 06:19 PM
-2

If you want to build a straw man, you're gonna need to try harder than that. "Lmao wow" You came to that conclusion, not I. Says a lot about you and it's so pathetic
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 06:15 PM
-1

A joint account only counts if you're the majority contributor to the account
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 06:14 PM
1

"ensuring they have clothing, planning events, holiday shopping, etc." Are you paying for all this?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 06:01 PM
0

People who think language should be policed should be hanged or sent to a specialized camp. Sorry I'd that frightens you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 05:49 PM
1

Who said anything about taking a sex worker out to coffee. Damn, you went from straw man to strait up haystack. And imagine believing women should be paid for sex lol
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 05:45 PM
-1

And after doing my research since then, you don't get the bonding with just supplements. You went fishing, how sad. Try some human contact for once, you incel
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 05:41 PM
-5

A woman's lack of reception to straightforwardness is not a failing on the part of men; that is entirely on women. And besides, even if not about sex, the same philosophy applies to getting into relationships. I never said it was "too complicated" you ignoramus, I said it was MORE complicated. If you can't read too well, I suggest taking a reading comprehension course
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 05:34 PM
2

You're right, I misunderstood the question. The answer to your question all boils down to the mental well-being of the child. Men and women are different; fathers and mothers are different and contribute different and important things to a child. With only one parent, the child is missing out on the vital aspects that come from the other parent. You can be just a swell person with money, but those aren't even close to the only things necessary to raise a healthy and mentally stable child.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 05:29 PM
1

"Tracking and monitoring men who say violent things" First of all, words aren't violence. Second, you suggest monitoring men who say things you don't like about women, which I don't even need to explain why that's a brainlet take
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 05:24 PM
1

Wow, you're not very bright.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 05:19 PM
-2

Not sure if that was an attempt at a straw man or a sincere misunderstanding of the position. I don't have any problem with anyone's ability to say no to anything they don't want, however just because you have the ability to do something doesn't mean that by exercising that ability, it doesn't make it more complicated by definition. I gave that as an example because that's literally how easy it is for a woman to get a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 05:17 PM
2

Most men are like that, yet women aren't willing to date many of those men. Miss me with that nonsense
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 05:12 PM
2

There is no difference besides getting the government involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 05:08 PM
1

Big difference: Feminism has invaded just about every aspect of the social sphere, whereas TRP has not.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 05:04 PM
5

Shocking, considering women still expect men en masse to adhere to their traditional roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:59 PM
1

Chivalrous men? Chivalry has been dead for many years, so where do women get off expecting something they butchered to continue living? Is TRP really misunderstanding if their formula works and proves that it works?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:54 PM
1

Very eloquently stated. Couldn't have done better myself!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:51 PM
3

Men and women are different; fathers and mothers are different. You're still missing crucial traits and perspectives that don't exist from same sex parenting.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:47 PM
2

Exactly, and we're seeing the opposite ring true as well. Men growing up in single mother homes are turning out terribly since they don't have that strong male role model to guide them, and many have become hyperfeminized and controlled by their emotions. It's so sad...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:45 PM
1

Depends on if we're supposed to be lobotomy patients and not acknowledge the immutable differences between a mother and a father.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:42 PM
1

You truly live up to your name, basedmama
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:40 PM
0

Your lack of understanding of why legacy is important to men is a failure in our education system to teach women about men's biology and testosterone. Just about every animal in the animal kingdom does this, so not sure why it's shocking that we aren't so different. "b...but we r hoomans we can ignor biological instincts!"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:39 PM
3

Nobody is a surrogate without consent, you jick
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:33 PM
4

Your misandry is showing, and your anecdotal evidence in the "all women I know" drivel is pointless and pathetic. Really, you're just a man-hating pile of burning garbage, you incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:32 PM
0

Any man with offspring has a legacy. You clearly missed the point
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:26 PM
2

Making sure you can afford to take care of them, for starters. Also, making sure you aren't choosing to reproduce with someone that isn't going to stay around and be a present parent. Making sure that you are mentally stable yourself before passing on all of your problems onto your children. I could go on, but just because someone has the ability to reproduce or be a parent, doesn't mean they should or that they are worthy of doing so.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:25 PM
0

Absolutely!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:21 PM
1

It's wrong to deprive children of their fathers as well, but society has conditioned you to believe that isn't the case or nearly as bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:20 PM
0

Finally, someone with the correct answer!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:19 PM
2

I'm not interested in some bimbo after my resources
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:16 PM
1

This is the way
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:16 PM
2

"...And they are well" Debatable.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:14 PM
1

Do the words "Let them eat cake" mean anything to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:11 PM
1

They cannot. A fact of biology many aren't aware of is that during sex, there is an exchange of oxytocin that you get from human touch. Sex toys can never replace true human contact simply due to chemicals alone
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:08 PM
-1

"Do you want to have sex?" "Yes" Requiring anything else is LITERALLY more complicated. You cannot rationally argue with that, however most women don't even realize that's all they need to do. So, absolutely it is women making it more complicated. Miss me with that ignorance.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:05 PM
1

Check your privilege
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 04:01 PM
0

Yeah, but women will then have to actually bring something to the table other than their sex, and unfortunately most men don't give a damn about your career or how much money you make
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 03:56 PM
1

Present in both sexes? No, stop that middle of the road garbage. Women have to not be a ham-beast, be present and say yes; they just happen to be choosier, which is NEVER a valid reason to be unable to find a mate. Men must go through the ringer just to be able to find a woman who is maybe interested in the possibility of considering the chance of thinking about having sex with him, if he presses with right buttons.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 03:53 PM
1

The goal isn't to solve romantic problems; it's to give men a sexual outlet that doesn't involve unnecessarily complicated channels. It wasn't men who made sex complicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 03:42 PM
1

Men have been doing that since time immemorial in the form of marriage, and they seemed to be content in doing so. I mean, that's what dating is whenever the female expects the male to pay for the meals, even if it is the first date, without guaranteed sex. Men are very straightforward and not complicated at all, so if there's in avenue where we are guaranteed to see the returns we desire for our financial investments, you better be damn sure we're gonna take it and be fulfilled while doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 03:40 PM
1

There's a difference between taxation for the purpose of funding the government for continued operation and taxation for the funding of special interests. And 1940s Germany would like to have a word about "mainstream" positions, but I digress. The point I'm making is that having too high standards is like refusing to purchase gas unless it's cheap enough or isn't premium enough for your standards. You're absolutely entitled to those standards, but your vehicle won't get far at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 04:10 PM
1

I would never imply that anyone should be compelled to date someone else. I also do consider taxation to be theft, but I don't need a hyperlink to say that the contractual fruits of my labors should be mine and mine alone, not to be burgled by the government to spend money of subsidies I may not agree with. You think subsidizing gas is okay because you're biased; it's something you want and feel that people should have. Following your own logic, it should be safe to assume that you do not subscr…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 03:39 PM
1

Of course taxation is theft by all logical measures, so miss me with that garbage. And again, it doesn't matter what you want in this matter, even if it is lower gas prices. You're not entitled to gas, and especially not to cheaper gas prices just because you want it. The same applies to a relationship with people like you. We're not entitled to a lower-cost-of-entry relationship with people just because we want it and just because it can possibly be supplemented, however you can see how it woul…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 03:23 PM
1

In the gas price scenario, you would be compelling the companies to lower their standards, at the gunpoint of the government, no less. You're just a terrible person, and you're just being incorrect on purpose at this point. You are not entitled to gas nor the services/goods of other people :)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 02:55 PM
0

It's easy to call someone condescending and immature instead of actually grasping concepts. I know abstract critical thinking may be a bit difficult for some people, but try to keep up. Those two things are analogous because intimate human relationships are a need for ones health, both mentally and physically (If this is where I've lost you, seek help.) And if you really want to go down that route, gas isn't a necessity; many people live without it. You can just as easily get a bike and ride to …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 02:23 PM
2

Exactly! Women started this garbage. Men weren't asking what women brought to the table till women started opening their ungrateful traps. Now they have the audacity to get peeved when men dare to do what they have been doing for decades? Yeah, get bent, ladies. Can't handle the heat? Get back in the kitchen.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 02:05 PM
2

And women here just want an attractive man who is strong, financially well off, a family man, someone who is selfless and will provide and protect, someone who will be monogamous with only them, someone who can carry on a good conversation, someone empathetic but not too sensitive, etc. I could go on. Be dumb elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 02:00 PM
0

If you can't grasp why those two things are analogous, then you're beyond reasoning. Saying you don't think they are analogous doesn't make it so; it just highlights your severe lack of understanding and failure to grasp simple concepts. I shouldn't need to explain why expecting people to pay for premium fuel as the baseline standard just because some can afford it is not only a completely valid comparison, but also an apt one. Think about the correct response to this and you'll have your answer…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 01:45 PM
1

I can't even begin to describe how correct this is! Very much on the mark!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 01:39 PM
1

Personally, no. However, I do know people who insist on premium fuel. Just because some can afford premium doesn't mean it should be the base standard
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 01:36 PM
1

Are gas prices not too high just because some people can afford it? Next question.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 01:32 PM
1

Because a woman's success is measured by how much she can extort from men
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/21 05:18 PM
1

Youth and beauty are things women are born with and are at their maximum when they are young adults. It doesn't take time to be beautiful but time will take your beauty. And it doesn't take money to be beautiful; it takes money to paint yourself up in a way most men have repeatedly stated we'd prefer you didn't do. The only effort needed is to be fit, but you should be doing that for yourself anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 08:57 PM
1

Me, too. And I'm more than happy to sit back and let women prove it!
/r/MensRights04/04/21 02:12 PM
1

I would make women say exactly what they want and mean
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/20 03:37 PM
8

Cause, generally, men don't accuse women of sexual assault. This is largely a female exclusive problem. Men are the ones falsely accused of sexual assault exponentially more than women, and the men who might end up coming out saying anything against a woman are looked at like they're lying, lucky, or a loser. We don't hate women; we hate people who lie about us, especially when there is tangible legal recourse for the men when it happens.
/r/AntiFeminists21/11/20 07:19 PM
2

I'm actually pro-choice, but I was pointing out why your argument is shit. You're a garbage person if your first reaction is going batshit crazy when you're called out on being stupid. And playing off your logic, not giving a fuck what anyone else thinks entitles everyone else to the same sentiment. And if the government takes away your ability to more easily absolve yourself of consequences for your actions, "We don't care about your sensibilities. Deal with it" :)
/r/AntiFeminists20/11/20 09:13 PM
2

Just because I don't want someone to die, doesn't mean it's my job to financially support them. Stupid argument is stupid
/r/AntiFeminists20/11/20 09:06 PM
11

We very well can. Telling someone that they deserve the consequences for their terrible decisions is hardly unfair. The other issue is: you're assuming that more money equals a better partner. Women have the responsibility to vet the people who they have kids with. If they fail to do that, they deserve to get shit on.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 04:25 PM
2

I think her copilot took over
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/20 02:23 PM
1

You can do the same thing in a relationship without marriage. Marriage only ensures that if the issue is unresolvable or both parties fail to reach an agreement, they're trapped. A relationship held together by coercion is not one that's held together by love. And if it's not love that's holding you together, you're in it for the wrong reasons
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 08:59 AM
1

Is that so? Well, considering that most marriages by far end in divorce and women are by far the primary initiators of divorce, the onus is on women to stop ending these relationships if the relationship being toxic is "not often the case"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 08:55 AM
1

Exactly. Marriage is work. Work doesn't equate to a good thing. Relationships are meant to make each other and ourselves happier. If I'm not happier in a relationship, there is no reason to be in one. Marriage only adds a punishment for wanting to leave an unhappy relationship. And I don't think marriage is so appealing. I've made that abundantly clear. You should never have to "fight" for someone and anyone who tells you otherwise is full of shit. Anyone worth loving will make it easier to do s…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 02:39 AM
1

Relationships should only exist to enrich your life. If it is not doing that any longer, there is no reason to stay. And you shouldn't be financially punished for leaving a toxic relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 02:34 AM
1

I see you're stalking my post history. That's fine. Either way, it's called being realistic. Most relationships do end and it's foolish not to realize that and plan for that. We aren't living in a Disney movie here. Relationships aren't going to be all sunshine and rainbows
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/20 02:33 AM
0

Well, then what's the point in getting married in general? Just don't get married at all. What can a woman offer a man (out of things that a man actually wants) later in life? And again, I don't believe in marriage in general. The other point here is that people pair bond with each other. Men don't only value looks, though it is very important for us. Women have all their spending power from the get-go. They should ideally sell while stocks are high, and invest in smarter assets they have access…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 04:37 PM
0

Financial security? Loyalty? Commitment? Time? Love? You know, the things that most people wish for out of a good marriage? The more she invests in him early, the higher her reward later.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 04:01 PM
1

I don't think marriage is a good thing in general. But, if I had to give a reason, it's that she can more easily pair bond and actually deserve a guy who can give her the best by giving him the best years of her life. Women have all of their sexual value front loaded when they become adults. Men know this. The longer she waits, the more mediocre her options become. However, this really only applies if she will end up wanting children, which is really the only reason anybody should get married an…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 03:53 PM
1

Considering that it's mostly women who end marriages, she'll likely just need to make the marriage she's in work. And to lower the chances of it being his fault, she needs to actually choose a good man and not some typical Chad fuckboy. I'm more or less playing devils advocate here, cause I honestly don't believe in marriage in this day and age, and I agree with your second part. She should focus on being able to support herself so she isn't being a leech on some poor guy and society later. Howe…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 03:42 PM
1

Men of the same age are expected to be accountable for their actions and to deal with the consequences of our choices. And are you talking about a situation where the father chooses the groom for the daughter like an arranged marriage? If not, it's still her responsibility to choose a good man.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 03:31 PM
0

Why would the onus be on him? She's old enough to take care of herself and be responsible for her own mistakes
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/20 03:25 PM
1

It's not good, but it's better than the alternative. It's like telling someone who is starving to learn how to not need food. Loneliness is physically and emotionally painful, but the food is poisoned.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/20 06:03 PM
1

Because, being able to leave more easily doesn't mean that someone isn't committed to you without marriage, darling. In fact, someone staying with you despite being able to leave easily makes it known to you that they truly care for you and are actually devoted to you rather than because they feel obligated because of a written contract. And assuming that men who are for marriage are the right guys is hilarious. Especially when plenty of women complain about their husbands, leave them, and talk …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/20 02:34 PM
4

If there were no evidence to the contrary, the word "alimony" wouldn't be commonplace in men's lexicon. There is no evidence that men are happier married, and these women aren't doing unpaid work. If the man is providing, they are getting paid. Men are usually the higher contribution financially in marriages. Subtract the woman's contribution from the man's contribution and you have the pay. Not to mention money that men pay to their ex-wives for years for services they are no longer providing
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 06:58 PM
7

Oh, do explain. That's quite a claim to make despite the evidence to the contrary
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 06:39 PM
7

This is Poe's Law, right here. I honestly can't tell if this is sarcasm or just willfully ignorant of how the reality of divorce for men is
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 06:33 PM
1

Marriage does not equal commitment, sweetheart. And it would be foolish to believe that most women are stupid enough to believe that. Don't be so willfully ignorant to believe that people don't commonly leave even after marriage, especially the women. All marriage does is give the power over to the woman in the relationship dynamic, especially when it comes to separating. Single motherhood comes from women not knowing how to pick the right person before they spread their legs for them. Women hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 03:51 PM
0

Not sure what is comedic about that. There should always be an easy out to unhealthy relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 03:20 PM
3

Oh, I always found that so cringe. People who are so eager to call their woman their "wife" don't realize that it's how the government gets you on common law. It's a little out there, but I believe the idea that you can commit to someone without being married to them shouldn't be an alien one.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 10:15 AM
3

Sure, you could say that. You'd be wrong, but you could say it. There's no substance behind a claim like that. Yeah, people can change their minds easily, but it's better to be with someone who actually wants to stay with you than trying to lock someone up and try to force a twisted Stockholm Syndrome.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 08:49 AM
5

Sure. Of course they do. But, if you're with someone who is willing to leave for stupid reasons, you should reevaluate what kind of people you decide to be with. Chances are, they saved you a lot of trouble anyway. The alternative is trapping them in a relationship that is difficult to leave. That won't stop them from being bored or falling out of love with you. At that point, you're purposely forcing someone to be with you out of obligation instead of love lest they be punished by the court sys…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 08:42 AM
4

That doesn't prove it's good at all. That proves the opposite, actually. People in bad relationships should be able to easily leave! I honestly can't even believe I actually have to explain this, but here we are. Sure, you can have any values you want, but doesn't make it right.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 08:35 AM
3

No, it doesn't mean that at all. And I never said relationships are a shackle. I said marriage is a shackle and the parallels stand. Nice try twisting my words around though. Points for trying. Your parents not believing in divorce is fine and dandy, but they're also from a bygone age where technological social interactions did not yet exist. We are in an era where divorce is over 50% and that only counts couples who have successfully divorced. That doesn't include people who are very unhappy in…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 08:29 AM
5

Security is more important than how the other person feels in a relationship. You heard it here, folks. Sounds pretty selfish and narcissistic. Plus, there's not any reason to worry about sharing insurance unless someone is leeching off the other. A complicated divorce keeps people who shouldn't be together in the first place from getting away. It's a shackle and men are usually screwed over in the process of breaking them. And marriage doesn't make someone a somebody. It's just a title that get…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 08:17 AM
3

So, you think it's better if they stay because they have to or get the courts involved? That mentality is the reason why people end up so miserable in marriage. Why would they leave unless they have a good reason to or they aren't given an incentive to stay? Men aren't afraid of commitment. There's just no good reason to get married. Just sounds like you want to trap a guy without caring about how they feel
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 08:03 AM
5

The action to stay in a relationship when you can easily leave at any time is a more sincere action than if you only do it under obligation or because it's more difficult to do otherwise
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 07:58 AM
2

Virtue signaling? Not quite sure where you're going with that. Are you trying to imply that a wife has more value than a long term girlfriend?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 07:56 AM
4

I wouldn't marry any woman, and I value a forever gf much higher than a wife. With a gf, I could leave at any time and am under no obligation to stay, but I choose to because I care for them. I also respect a woman more who appreciates that I don't want the government involved in my relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 07:00 AM
3

Only one of those interactions involves wanting to obtain the earned resources of another
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 11:36 AM
1

Yes, but to me, it's more of a "fact of life" rather than something that needs to be complained about.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/19 08:52 PM
1

Ah, that's understandable. And, no. I'm a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 05:31 AM
1

Not sure if my answer would apply here, but I used to have a decent amount of sex. I'm currently 26. However, I no longer care for pursuing or having any sex at all. I am voluntarily celibate and I can assure you that there are many things in life that can make you happy other than sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/19 05:08 AM
7

The chemicals in your brain will need time to adjust since you're still in "relationship mode", but believe me, you'll get there. Just hang in there and begin to focus on yourself and your new bright future. Staying downtrodden only gives her the power to emotionally control you without her even being there.
/r/MGTOW06/06/19 03:35 AM
10

White Knights can only move in the shape of an "L". That's no coincidence!
/r/MGTOW21/05/19 10:34 PM
4

I read this in a heavy Russian accent. Not disappointed
/r/MGTOW14/04/19 06:29 PM
2

-Loyal -Honest -Punctual -Cheerful/Positive -Straightforward -Someone who likes sex -Nurturing/Affectionate -Self-Confident (but not vain) -Laid-Back/Easygoing (but not neglectful)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/19 05:11 AM
5

I don't owe society a damn thing, and neither does anybody else. Just because I live around others, doesn't mean I have to care about anybody else. Society doesn't provide things to me without charge. I pay my "entry fee" in form of taxes. You, nor anybody else, gets to assign duty to a person without their explicit consent. I don't need to give back to society to the best of my ability; our contribution comes from the taxes that are stolen from us. Also, regarding the "as long as it's not illeg…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 12:24 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter