TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PuppyPuppies Archive

View 0 posts and 82 comments by PuppyPuppies on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No. If asking someone if they're having fun having sex with you and it suddenly gets really awkward, that's probably indicative of the fact that they aren't very comfortable, anyway. My boyfriend and I have both occasionally asked if the other is having fun because the other seemed tired or something, and it turned out fine. If you are not able to ask your partner whether or not they are comfortable with what is going on between you two, you should not be having sex. Unpopular opinion, but whate…
/r/MensRights21/06/12 12:01 AM
-6

It's not "fucking stupid" it's pretty damn reasonable. If you're having sex with someone (male or female) and you're well into it and they haven't said a single thing to encourage you the whole time, it's not unreasonable to ask them, "Hey, you're really quiet, are you having fun?"
/r/MensRights20/06/12 09:09 PM
1

I guess the point of the story is to make sure the girl you're having sex with ACTUALLY wants to have sex with you?
/r/MensRights20/06/12 09:04 PM
3

I have no idea what kind of job you were applying for or why you had to take such a test, but I assure you, knowing women who have been involved in psychotherapy, they are also routinely asked about their sex life. It's just normal territory for adults.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 08:33 PM
1

Who exactly are you giving a taste of their own medicine? You realize that the churchgoers who posted that message probably don't visit this subreddit, right?
/r/MensRights17/06/12 10:01 AM
4

"Hey, someone made a misandric statement and this is insulting to me! Let's respond by stooping to their level and making an equally misogynistic comment." That's mature.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 03:17 AM
5

I definitely think that many radical feminists do, as you say, cling to maintaining "victim status" and this is one of my biggest problems with feminism, however this is simply not a case where this is happening. Circumcision and FGM are certainly comparable in many respects and I support and praise OP for making his argument, but implying that the average result of circumcision is equally as bad as the average result of FGM is just not true.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 12:43 AM
13

I'm not an expert on the subject so someone who is more educated should feel free to correct me on the specifics, but even in regards to sex, there are people who are born intersex, so even treating sex as a dichotomy is technically incorrect, isn't it?
/r/MensRights10/06/12 12:12 AM
6

Even moderate feminists believe that sexism equals power plus privilege I'm sort of assuming you meant to say, "Sexism equals power plus prejudice"? If not, you can disregard what I'm about to say. I happen to be a feminist who does believe the quoted idea, but I believe people can be sexist against men as well. I believe male privilege exists in many parts of my culture, but there is such a thing as female privilege, as well; e.g. if a male elementary school teacher works in a school system whe…
/r/MensRights10/06/12 12:08 AM
4

This is not the place for Manhood Academy. It doesn't contribute to the conversation and it doesn't help this movement.
/r/MensRights04/06/12 09:01 PM
1

Are you asking where you were justifying corrective rape? Because if you're confused about that, maybe you should reread your last comment.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 10:51 PM
0

That is a disgusting mindset. What is wrong with you? One of the biggest issues facing MRAs is to improve prison conditions because of the rape that is a daily reality for the men imprisoned there, and now you are promoting that idea?
/r/MensRights01/06/12 10:46 PM
1

Yes, this is very sexist. There are plenty of intelligent men who want to get married. Not all men are looking to have sex with as many women as they can without any commitment. It's just promoting the same stereotypes of men that are everywhere in our culture.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 12:00 AM
3

When I first read the title I thought you were going to post an image of some kick ass battle-gear and I was really excited. No such luck. But yeah, it's stupid, sexist and unprofessional. File a complaint.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 09:42 PM
13

Manhood Academy is trash.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 09:30 PM
1

You realize you didn't actually say anything there, right? Your post is the equivalent of a Creationist saying, "Yeah, well you may have evidence to back up what your saying, but your "science" doesn't make my grandparents seem any more like chimps!"
/r/MensRights15/05/12 11:09 PM
1

Guess what gender gets arrested for being alone in the park. If you're not going to do any actual research, at least read the other comments in this thread. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/tib98/playground_double_standard/c4mxohb
/r/MensRights15/05/12 08:16 PM
1

Hm, I'm not sure how to respond to this comment because I think we might be misunderstanding each other? Not sure. I did not mean to imply that MRAs did not support male teachers or stay-at-home dads; on the contrary I have found that they are generally supportive of such men (in my experience, anyway.) If it seemed like I was accusing MRAs of that, I apologize. I was asserting that men who take on those roles often receive stigma from mainstream society as a whole, not from men's rights movemen…
/r/MensRights13/05/12 08:14 PM
1

I've heard "magina" used as insult for men who take on traditionally female roles. Maybe that's not popular usage, though, I really don't know. Are you saying that there is no stigma for men who are stay-at-home dads and the like?
/r/MensRights13/05/12 03:30 AM
1

You've already shown that you're far more interested in pushing your own agenda than reaching any sort of relative truth, but sure. Go ahead. Show me how feminism is linked to "pedo hysteria" and I will certainly look at what you've posted and maybe it will be convincing evidence and if it is, I will be very grateful to have learned something new. However, I tend to tread lightly when it comes to reviewing the evidence of people who put the value of pushing their own beliefs over the value of re…
/r/MensRights12/05/12 02:54 AM
3

Except I never argued that feminism is perfect or even close to it? I "defended" feminism by questioning it's relevancy to the OP, nothing more. I have had many doubts about whether I even personally identify as a feminist. Frankly, you're looking for an argument to the point where you'll falsify your opponents beliefs just as an excuse to trash on something you don't like. Grow up.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 02:15 AM
4

Oh wait...you're a woman. Go figure. I'm pretty sure it's a troll. Don't take the bait and fuel claims of MRA's misogyny. Trolls are trolls, which is why they make no sense. Gender is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 01:10 AM
5

I didn't comment for a feminism: good vs. bad debate. I came because I was interested in discussing a specific issue and why this person thinks feminism is related to the stigmatization of pedophilia. You're here to proselytize. I'm here to learn. When your position changes, let's have this talk again. Thanks.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 01:02 AM
6

While I appreciate the discussion, I never said that feminism doesn't work for equality for women. I think many individual feminists also consider men's rights to be an important part of their application of feminism (as I do myself), but I never said men's rights are a central tenet of feminism. If you look at my original post, I never even mentioned the word equality. In my view, if we look at feminism from a historical perspective, it's a woman's rights movement first and a gender equality mo…
/r/MensRights12/05/12 12:38 AM
5

To be fair, I think you can make the same statements about most modern "-ism" ideologies, though. Yes, feminism has many different approaches and applications and no statement will ever apply to all feminists, but the same can be said about Christians, Gay Rights Activists, Republicans, Humanists, Environmentalists, etc. That doesn't mean you can't find generally accepted central tenets in any of these ideologies.
/r/MensRights12/05/12 12:24 AM
8

Feminism works to disband gender roles. That includes taking the stigma away from childcare roles that currently exists. Childcare is looked down upon as "women's work" and many feminists would avidly support men who want to take stronger roles in what is traditionally a "woman's role in the home." You are confusing two different issues here. There is a legitimate stigma towards men who are the main caregiver to their children (called "manginas" or other insulting terms used to degrade) which is…
/r/MensRights12/05/12 12:06 AM
3

You still don't get it. Read Pointer1VB's other comment.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 08:59 PM
2

Oh wait, derp. I just realized I totally misread your comment. I thought you said "you'll be less likely to obsess over it." Yes, I completely agree and I think what you presented is a completely reasonable result.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 01:26 AM
2

Understood. It certainly might be true in some or even many cases that reduced sexual pleasure can lead to a reduced sex drive. However, I doubt that it would be the case every time and at the very least uncomfortable accepting the assertion until I've seen some scientific research to back it up. (This might exist, I just haven't seen it. If anyone has access to an answer one way or the other, that would be great.) However, as I said in my post, even if it truly did reduce sex drive, that's hard…
/r/MensRights06/05/12 01:04 AM
4

This is a really silly post. Yes, her original statement was directed at males who try to gender-shame, but she acknowledged that women do it too, and flat-out said that she only referenced men because of the situation she was just in. Your initial comment saying, "Women do it, too" is fine, because you're right; they do. But once she acknowledged that you should have let it go. This is not bigotry and if you think it is, you need to educate yourself.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 09:18 PM
11

Um, I'm a feminist and I argue firmly against male circumcision whenever the topic comes up, whether it be at a feminist rally or in my personal life and I know PLENTY of feminists who do the same. I'm not saying there aren't any feminists who endorse male circumcision, there certainly are, but in my circumstances feminists are far more ready to listen to opposing viewpoints on this topic and take it seriously, where non-feminists that I know are likely to laugh it off and say that I'm complaini…
/r/MensRights05/05/12 09:05 PM
5

Since you asked for female opinions, I'll give you mine. You were in the right, completely, based on what I can tell from what you've posted here. I'm always really shocked to see people post things like that but even more so that they're always so readily endorsed by flocks of others. A person's genitalia shouldn't determine how they're treated; as many others in this thread have pointed out, it works both ways and she's advocating the kind of thought process that leads to the sexual objectific…
/r/MensRights29/04/12 09:22 PM
4

Okay, I'm sorry but the video is a joke. 1) His claim that women use the insult that a man "can't get laid" as a veiled threat to eliminate him from the gene pool? That fails to explain why men would use this threat against other men. Quite a more likely explanation is that men in our society are valued for their sexual prowess, and that is why asserting that a man doesn't have sex is used as an insult by both genders. 2) Women have more effective means of birth control than men. Yes, this is tr…
/r/MensRights31/03/12 03:57 AM
4

I agree with your point about rape, but c'mon, "huge Negro?" Really? The racism takes away from your post.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 11:45 PM
14

Reading that story was incredibly disturbing. I can vaguely understand feeling strongly about circumcision if you're religious... but she's not?! (Not saying that it is justified if you're religious, just that I can understand the reasoning.) “If you ever want your son to get a blow job — circumcise him.” This line was where I lost it. Imagine someone trying to justify female circumcision because it feels better when a guy puts his dick inside a woman. Sickening.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 10:11 PM
2

I would completely support the father's right to a financial abortion, as long as the cut-off date was around the same time the cut-off date is for a woman to have an actual abortion, i.e. some time before the third trimester. I am staunchly pro-choice; it's only fair that men have the same amount of choice. By the way, this is mostly irrelevant, but since OP brought it up, I consider myself a feminist.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 10:02 PM
1

Just like when people refer to black people as n-ggers, they're not being offensive, right? If anyone gets offended by that, it's his fault, not yours for completely ignoring the racist history of the word. /s Give me a break. She provided the accepted etiquette for people who are interested in being polite. It has nothing to do with her thinking the world should revolve around her.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 11:16 PM
2

You can't argue with someone who's not interested in reality. Just ignore her and move on. Sex slaves != prostitution. Conflating the two shows you that she's simply not interested in coming to a reasonable position on this. But there are legitimate sex slaves within prostitution. Underage girls and boys who are brought to America from other countries, told they'll be given legitimate jobs. (I use the term legitimate here because technically prostitution is illegal and cannot be considered a leg…
/r/MensRights03/03/12 06:38 PM
7

He wasn't referring to the title MensRights, he was referring to the subtitle: "Earning scorn from bigoted feminists and white knights since March 2008". He's stated elsewhere in the thread that he's fine with using the title MensRights.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 05:59 PM
10

Emails, text messages, and court appearances later, I'm at the exact stop. Save these. Her letter says you haven't attempted to contact your son. Show the judge that that is a lie. If she's lying about all of these things, you need to save all the evidence that makes that apparent. I wish I had more to say that was helpful. Good luck.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 06:18 AM
2

Ah, okay. Thanks.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 11:21 AM
2

Did you mean to respond to my post? Or someone else's?
/r/MensRights21/02/12 09:24 AM
9

Asking for what? Having people look at her butt? Because yes, when you post a picture of something and nothing else, you are asking for people to look at it. Are you kidding me? Her profile was literally a picture of her ass with everything else cropped out. How can you say she wasn't asking for people to look at it?
/r/MensRights21/02/12 06:50 AM
3

I hope this is satirical.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 06:45 AM
3

I totally agree with you 100%. There is a fine line between glancing and staring/leering and the latter is just not cool. However, it is a bit ironic how the girl in the image gets upset about people treating her "like a piece of ass" and then her profile picture is a blatant close-up image of her ass. So, I think her situation and yours are bit different.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 06:34 AM
0

People have been forced to work to survive since the beginning of time. That's the basis of Capitalism; those who don't work (read: make money) do not survive in society. EDIT: Downvoted for not blinding myself to reality. What a surprise.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 10:18 PM
3

Thank you very much for clarifying, it makes a huge difference. Sorry for jumping to conclusions, I'm very glad that I was wrong in this case.
/r/seduction26/01/12 09:13 PM
2

There's a difference between hooking up with someone you like who happens to be drunk and targeting drunk chicks because you can't get any "better" women and drunk girls are easier to hook up with. I could be wrong, but the way OP is phrasing it, it definitely seems like the latter.
/r/seduction26/01/12 02:39 PM
5

You're a piece of shit if you're actively trying to hook up with drunk girls, seriously. I don't care how many downvotes I get for posting this. It needs to be said because it's true.
/r/seduction26/01/12 09:59 AM
3

I think after the period that an abortion is off the table, though, this option should be restricted. This is a really great addendum and I wouldn't support the idea of a financial abortion without it.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 05:08 AM
5

This is idiotic. A woman is not a gumball machine, an oven or any other object. Besides, in this case the "gumball machine" is also putting in 25 cents, as well. This just trivializes what is a complex issue.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 05:05 AM
2

I guess that's the point of the hyperbole. To practice the fantasy of perfect consent, dreamed by extreme feminists, would mean nobody would have sex, ever. So you didn't post that, then?
/r/MensRights20/01/12 04:36 AM
1

The problem isn't that you can't be drunk and give consent. The problem is that in court, when women accuse men of raping them lawyers will always bring up whether or not she was drinking and use that against her. Even if she said no to sex, if she was drinking, it works against her. It's becomes more difficult when both parties are intoxicated, but if a sober person is trying to have sex with a clearly drunken person, s/he's being an asshole.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 04:33 AM
2

I think it's the opposite, honestly. In my experience, I see women as generally shamed for having lots of sex, whereas men are shamed for not having enough sex. Culturally, men are supposed to sexually dominant, experienced and always trying to get more sex. Of course this is nonsense, not all men are these sex-hounds that are portrayed in the media (not that there's anything wrong with men who are), but anyone who openly doesn't fall into this category, because he wants to wait or he's not inte…
/r/MensRights20/01/12 04:16 AM
1

There is a #RealMenWant.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 08:16 AM
2

This is a great article. Equality means equality. "Women and children first" is nonsense. Women aren't children, they're fully functioning adults. I don't see a reason for a life to be valued more or less simply because of gender.
/r/MensRights18/01/12 07:51 AM
5

The problem with that is all these men were found "guilty" at one point, as well.
/r/MensRights18/01/12 06:11 AM
1

Nice to see a video that focuses on the negative male stereotypes in society.
/r/MensRights17/01/12 10:25 AM
11

If you actually look at the ad shown in the article, it's not targeting the rapist? The ad is directed at people who aren't rapists, but might have a friend who is and are in a position to stop him/her or at the very least, challenge the mindset of that friend. I agree that the ad only focuses on male on female rape and that's a legitimate problem, but directing ads towards people who aren't rapists or victims isn't a problem.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 12:18 AM
5

I don't understand that person's reasoning at all. The fact that men are expected to act "manly" and never receive help is sexism against men, not women? I really dislike when people equate sexism with misogyny. It's a two-way street.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 11:25 PM
1

I expressed an opinion that you apparently disagree with and you find it necessary to point out to me - at length might I add - that I am apparently wrong. I didn't say you were wrong, I said you're not seeing it from another point of view. You're idea of "respecting someone's opinion" is remaining silent when you disagree with them? When I discuss issues like these with people, I do so because I assume they are mature enough to hear an opposing opinion without taking it as a personal attack. Qu…
/r/MensRights08/01/12 05:14 AM
1

I expressed an opinion and you have chosen to avoid seeing it from any other perpective than your own. That's not true at all. I absolutely think that abortion is in no way a good thing and having abortions for trivial reasons is awful. The difference between you and me is that I didn't call everyone who disagrees with abortion immoral. You, however, made a very generalized statement about women who get abortions, saying that they must all have empathy problems. If the vast majority of abortions…
/r/MensRights07/01/12 06:38 PM
1

I think that when you cut through the BS, it is a verfy smple issue. What is "BS" to you are choices that will dramatically affect the rest of someone else's life. But if you're not willing to look at the situation from another person's perspective, so it's not even worth discussing with you. Rape happens. So do false accusations of rape. What proportion of pregnancies are caused by actual rape is anyone's guess. Is this even relevant? What's your point? You think that women who are actually rap…
/r/MensRights05/01/12 07:10 AM
1

But you agree that would be fine if they agreed that it was a women's advocacy group?
/r/MensRights03/01/12 10:52 PM
1

Generally, those who advocate only for women see that as the underlying purpose of feminism and those who advocate for gender equality see that as the underlying purpose for feminism. I think that this discrepancy can be considered a flaw in feminism, but there are discrepancies between the members of all groups. Saying things like "this is how feminists actually feel" is misleading because feminists, like men's rights advocates, have varying opinions on different issues.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 10:16 PM
1

I've felt for years that feminism (especially radical feminism) was a crock of shit...because focusing only on the issues of one group seems inherently unfair and unproductive to me. I honestly don't see how you can argue that the men's rights movement doesn't do the same thing? They focus on men's rights specifically because that's their point. I don't complain when I don't see violence against women posted in this subreddit even though it's a valid problem because that's not the point of this …
/r/MensRights03/01/12 09:17 PM
1

http://community.feministing.com/2010/06/07/being-allies-against-male-circumcision/ EDIT: Also, how, when, where has the men's rights movement addressed any women's issues? If focusing on the issues of one group is unfair, isn't that basically saying men's rights as a movement is unfair...? You never responded to this.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 09:14 PM
-1

I might be misinterpreting your tone, and if I am, I sincerely apologize, but it seems like you're dismissing having and raising children as simply "women's work." It is physically impossible for a woman to have a child without a man, of course. I think whether or not the father is willing to stick around and start a family with the mother has a strong influence on whether or not she chooses to keep the child.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 07:21 PM
3

Of course the problem is that in general feminists don't want women to have children...But the willingness of men to support families at an individual level is irrelevant. Women who choose not to start a family are to blame but the men who refuse to support those families are in no way at fault in any way? Defend this statement, please.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 06:42 PM
1

Then by definition, women at large are guilty of the same thing as they almost never see any other view than their own. Source? I'm not saying there aren't any narrow-minded women? (Though I'm not sure if your statement of "women at large" isn't just something you made up based on personal experience.) What is your argument here? "Women are narrow-minded, so we should be, too"? Abortion is nothing more than women being able to deny responsibility for their own actions. That's one way to look at …
/r/MensRights02/01/12 06:25 PM
1

Ah, okay. I'm really bad at picking up sarcasm on the internet, sometimes, sorry!
/r/MensRights02/01/12 01:28 AM
1

I did. His story is tragic, to say the least and I'm not saying that there aren't any double standards at all, when it comes to abortion. It's a complex issue. But making blanket statements like saying all abortion is morally wrong without giving any reasons to back that up isn't fair. Unless I misinterpreted what he was saying and he was only calling that specific incident morally wrong, which is possible.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 12:26 AM
3

Masculinity != male, and femininity != female. mas·cu·line [mas-kyuh-lin] Show IPA adjective 1. pertaining to or characteristic of a man or men: masculine attire. 2. having qualities traditionally ascribed to men, as strength and boldness. fem·i·nine [fem-uh-nin] Show IPA adjective 1. pertaining to a woman or girl: feminine beauty; feminine dress. 2. having qualities traditionally ascribed to women, as sensitivity or gentleness. 3. effeminate; womanish: a man with a feminine walk. 4. belonging t…
/r/MensRights01/01/12 07:31 AM
2

How is abortion an arbitrary ending of another life? Plenty of women choose to get an abortion because they know they can't support the child on their own or don't have the money to stay healthy for the baby during pregnancy. You're allowed to have your own opinion on the morality of abortion, but you're being incredibly narrow-minded here by refusing to see the opposing viewpoint.
/r/MensRights01/01/12 06:50 AM
1

using it as a reason to avoida child is crass, and morally wrong You realize this is just your opinion, right? You can't state as a fact what is morally right or wrong. You can only give your opinion on the subject. You can back up your opinion with evidence to convince others, but until you do that, there's no reason for anyone else to take you seriously.
/r/MensRights01/01/12 06:44 AM
7

hes god some good points I see what you did there.
/r/MensRights01/01/12 04:43 AM
1

Disagree. The best thing a victim of domestic violence can do is leave the situation. You are assuming that most victims are the ones who initiate the violence, which is pretty awful.
/r/MensRights01/01/12 04:25 AM
2

No? But whatever, making assumptions is cool, too, I guess?
/r/MensRights30/12/11 07:01 PM
2

Not really. I'm a feminist and I don't hate men, and in my eyes, any feminist who labels men as "the enemy" or blames in the inequities in our society completely on men is uninformed or unintelligent. Nice try, though.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 02:38 AM
0

This is a good discussion. Thank you for the link!
/r/MensRights29/12/11 11:12 PM
3

Both men and women are under attack, that's true. However, I think a lot of the problems faced by men and women come from societal gender roles. There are a lot of unfair stereotypes that affect women, but it's the same with men. I think there is clearly an unfair bias towards women when it comes to child custody and other similar issues. That being said, the image posted in this thread doesn't target discriminative groups (I am aware of NOW but not very familiar with it, from what I've seen bef…
/r/MensRights29/12/11 11:00 PM
8

Kicking a man in the crotch as an attempt at humor is unacceptable. Men's rights are just as important as women's rights; hence the importance of gender equality. A situation where one spouse is physically harming the other is abuse, and that's not acceptable. I am a feminist and I support men's rights and women's rights. Are there feminists who use gender equality as a guise for misandry? Certainly. But acting like this is the underlying point of feminism is just silly. Men's rights and women's…
/r/MensRights29/12/11 10:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter