TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Pure-Ad-8175 Archive

View 0 posts and 163 comments by Pure-Ad-8175 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

the premise is that if publishers can “force” men to have sex with women they initially wouldn’t desire Again, how many women have you been forced to fuck?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 05:01 AM
–

Men are always putting in more effort... but only 10% of US divorces involve alimony, and not all from the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 12:31 AM
1

But your premise here is that the big bad publishers have taken your ability to have standard away... somehow resulting in absolutely zero sex with women you don't want to fuck. To make it fair, you now want women to be raped by men that they don't consent to gave sex with. ??
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 12:29 AM
1

How many fat women have you fucked?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 11:35 PM
1

Have no idea why you're prattling on about any of this. None of this justifies your rapist beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 11:32 PM
2

What if they were? That doesn't take away your entitlement to whatever standards you want. A magazine spread with a fat lady doesn't mean women have to fuck autistic guys against their will.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 11:13 PM
2

And again, if absolutely unattractive women who would be rejected by men otherwise can have the right to demand sex from men (even if covertly), What are you talking about? (Yes, calling them shallow does imply they want sex from them. Again, connect the dots.) And again, no one gives a shit! You're free to want sex from women younger than you! AND they are entitled to reject you, for any reason they choose. Fat women are free to want sex from men! AND those men are entitled to reject those wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 11:05 PM
2

then men are allowed to say that women are shallow for not sleeping with guys who are not tall and athlethic. Bro, no one cares about that. There's not what we're fighting about. You aren't calling women shallow. You're telling them that they are not entitled to bodily autonomy. Because they affect much less people If was not entitled to reject men for any reason I chose, I would kill myself today. A lot of women would. You are not able to say that fewer women would be impacted by the loss of ri…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 10:36 PM
2

WHY is that what matters? You are not making a case for why men's preferences take away women's right to say no to sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 10:13 PM
2

So men's preferences dictate whether women are allowed to say no? If men had different standards, women would be allowed to have standards? But because men like to fuck the women they're most attracted to, now women are obligated to fuck the men they are least attracted to?" Wow. And it seems you cannot explain it, after all. The answer is that they don't think it makes a difference financially. Maybe it's because women actually buy a lot of their partners clothes. Maybe it's because men don't l…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 09:39 PM
2

You're not attracted to them=you will reject them. Connect the dots. And?? You've posted that you want to date women considerably younger than you because they're the most attractive to you. I think it's pretty pathetic. AND YOU ARE 100% ENTITLED TO REJECT WOMEN YOUR AGE! Believing that you are gross =/= believing you are not entitled to have your standards you should explain why aren't there not even nearly as many fat male models, even though there are quite a few fat men out there. Probably a…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 09:27 PM
3

1- Even if an ad explicitly suggested you're fatphobic for not being attracted to fat women, that is NOT saying you're not entitled to reject them! Those are different things. 2- What the hell are you talking about? Ads often include larger people because they want to sell things to larger people. Why would a women's clothing company make an ad for your dick?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 09:12 PM
2

Sorry, which one of those links says you're not entitled not to fuck fat women?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 09:03 PM
2

It's incredibly funny, because OP once posted that they didn't want to consider dating anyone more than 2 years older than him...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 08:49 PM
1

And what the hell does that have to do with the question in the post?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 08:39 PM
2

I don't remember the "men aren't entitled to say no to fat chicks" campaign.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 08:38 PM
1

What? How? What would this question have to do with that? Men aren't choosing between friends and the chance of relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 08:32 PM
1

What? How?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 08:20 PM
1

The post question is not about male loneliness in any way.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 08:17 PM
1

And at no point did you specify that you're only talking about complaints on this subreddit. This is your comment that were discussing: My thoughts exactly. And exactly that's why "just find some good friends" as an argument against men's complaints about loneliness should die.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 08:10 PM
1

Expect which men to listen to which complaints?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 07:19 PM
1

Why "should" we?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 07:15 PM
2

Expecting men to bear all the burden is just unfair. ?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 06:47 PM
4

They don't even attempt to understand it. ? The "I would choose B if I didn't have a partner already" illustrates this well. ?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 06:27 PM
5

They don't know the experience of never being able to have friends either.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 06:11 PM
1

You are free to assume that people don't mean what they say, and instead coincidentally mean the specific thing you personally feel about your own life... But a lot of other people are just taking people at their word.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 06:08 PM
2

That's nice, but I don't think it's productive to respond to conversations you claim to have had with other people when you're clearly so unreliable at representing them. If you are upset about people's comments in other conversations, you should probably address them there, instead of misrepresenting them elsewhere. The fact that you think this post has anything to do with these situations suggests a real gap in understanding on your part.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 05:24 PM
3

OP has previously posted saying they are a man: https://np.reddit.com/r/dating_advice/comments/13a0tzj/is_it_too_late_for_me_to_start_dating_with_people/
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 05:18 PM
1

Good for them. You said something completely different here.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:59 PM
2

I am lonely =/= I can't get romantic relationships If you are unable to tell the difference, I'm sure you find conversations frustrating.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:50 PM
1

If anyone is making that argument, it's not what you brought up here. You brought up the fact that people recommend that lonely people try to make friends. That has absolutely nothing to do with thinking about one should replace romantic relationships with friends!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:46 PM
2

Why are you weighing them against each other in this context?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:41 PM
2

I'm not following. Why would anyone presuppose either? I'm not even sure what you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:40 PM
2

Wait, do you think that people in working marriages can never experience loneliness?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:39 PM
3

And lonely people who make friends can still seek romantic relationships too.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:36 PM
8

So what? A lot of people are lonely in spite of being married.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:30 PM
7

What does that have to do with thinking lonely people should try to make friends?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:18 PM
5

So what?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:10 PM
9

But in real life, making friends doesn't mean never being able to date, but it can help with loneliness...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:09 PM
9

Scenario B
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 03:57 PM
15

Young boys in their 30s 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 03:34 PM
–

Doing chores for reward is literally a stage of childhood development. You're proving the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 01:50 PM
–

And right after divorce these women start having casual sex to no end with good-looking, hot, fit, younger men who absolutely bring no additional value to their lives and perform absolutely no household chore for them. But does she have to do chores for them? Women are saying that they aren't getting the same amount of effort that they put in to marriage. The important thing is that it's even, that the relationships aren't draining her.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 01:34 PM
3

The difference is that I "perceive" that there's an agreement with another person?? That's the clarity that you're putting on a pedestal? There's no ambiguity... except that I literally don't know if I'm even communicating with a human being, much less someone who is interested in me! It's clear when I'm being deceived... except that it absolutely is not! I always know what went wrong... except that I absolutely do not! Look, I like online dating, I prefer online dating. But your position that i…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 07:50 AM
2

The agreement and intent are clear, even if rare exceptions occur. Again, you're saying I had a clear agreement with a bot to be romantic? Is that what you are saying?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 07:30 AM
2

Yes, you might not know why they didn’t show up, bot, accident, or flake. Please explain how I know there was deception if I don't know whether my date was a real person who was hit by a car on the way to the date. Does getting hit by a car count as deception?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 07:25 AM
2

Explain to me how the deception is clear? If I communicate with another account on a dating site and make dinner plans, then no one shows up... I have no clue why. I don't know they were a bot, or a bad person, or someone who got into a car accident. How is it identifiable?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 07:18 AM
3

person 2 was deceived after a clear, explicit agreement to meet for romantic intent Agreement with who? A bot?? Person 1, on the other hand, is stuck in a murky, mixed-signal situation where they don’t even know if there was ever genuine interest. Person 2 also doesn't know if there was ever genuine interest! At least person 2 knows what went wrong How would they know what went wrong if they were stood up?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 07:07 AM
6

You can’t fake the context, only your identity. That’s still miles ahead of real-life ambiguity. Why? Person 1 is at dinner with a real person who isn't sexually interested in them. Person 2 is alone at a restaurant waiting for their online date who is actually a bot instead of a real person. Why is person 2 better off?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 07:01 AM
7

On a dating app, both people already opted into romantic context, so “Would you like to get dinner?” is never misread. Of course it's "misread." There are complete catfishes who join online dating apps to mess with people. There are people in relationships who join just for the validation. There are scammers that are there to get you into a crypto scheme. There are people with crippling anxiety who will never show up for any dates. There are plenty of people who are not there for any romantic pu…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 06:47 AM
5

I’m saying those principles should exist in in-person dating. But too often, they’re ignored or distorted. You're saying they don't exist, but should exist? Or you're saying they do exist, but are ignored? The problem isn’t that clarity can’t exist IRL. But you just said that clarity exists in many ways in person!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 06:24 AM
7

Every culture still runs on understood expectations, consent, boundaries, respect, honesty. Those are observable, enforceable, and yes, universal principles, whether you’re in Tokyo or Texas. But aren't you arguing that none of this exists for in-person dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 06:10 AM
9

Did either of these men express interest in these women?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:33 AM
1

lol, make a whole post about the arguments people have about a topic, and then claim that no one ever talks about it 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:27 AM
2

Ooooh, so only people with internet access talk about it. OK. 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:02 AM
4

So no one is talking about wanting partners with low body counts... but somehow you've heard a dozen arguments against it?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 03:44 AM
7

And online dating can't be an issue? Who do you think is getting posted on "are we dating the same guy" sites?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 03:18 AM
6

But if a man reads your post and thinks, "meeting women in person has always worked well for me," are you here to tell him that's not valid?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 03:12 AM
4

Yes, if you keep pretending that words don't have meaning, it's a pretty meaningless conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 02:21 AM
6

That's pretty hedonistic, not sure why that isn't clear. It's not clear because you are literally saying their reason for settling down is not for pleasure, which is the definition of hedonistic! The male hedonistic acts are based more on what women complain about some guys doing or actions that only benefit the guy mostly. Women complain about it =/= it's hedonistic Why did you choose to base your entire post on a word that doesn't match what you want to talk about?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 01:38 AM
7

You said women settle down with boring guys for security! How is that hedonistic? The guy who wants kids and only wants kids within wedlock benefits I suppose. That sounds like pleasure to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 01:20 AM
2

Would you rather sleep with someone who has had protected sex with 15 partners with negative STD tests, or someone who had unprotected sex with 10 one-night stands from the bar?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 01:17 AM
3

So now the premise is that no one gets pleasure from exclusive or committed relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 01:05 AM
1

How does effort & commitment = pleasure? YOU said it's optimally hedonistic (FOR PLEASURE) for men to put effort and commitment into marriage! But now you're saying that hedonistic men should not get married?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 12:58 AM
2

Men avoid women because of their sexual skills?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 12:47 AM
10

You're saying that the hedonistic strategy for men includes "all your real effort and commitment for marriage material when that comes along." So I assume you think marriage is pleasurable for men, yes? For women, you describe it as "for security."
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 12:44 AM
6

If they did matter, men would be putting as much effort into it as women do How can women's looks matter if they have nothing to do with real love?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 12:36 AM
7

The premise here is that exclusive relationships do not provide pleasure to women...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 12:35 AM
2

Wouldn't that be irrelevant? If real love is based on personality, instead of physical appearance?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 12:07 AM
10

If I love you for personality traits, I can dump you when they change? How is that not conditional?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 10:35 PM
3

Men and women should be loved for who they are. Why won't you tell us what you mean by this?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 10:30 PM
13

Did you just realize it's the 21st century?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 09:51 PM
15

We’d just be loved for who we are and that’s it. Meaning what? What do you want to be loved for?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 09:48 PM
3

but these are the reason why someone cares and is completely valid, just like is completely valid not to care the former doesnt has the same motivations or follows the same dynamics as the latter, so it doesnt makes sense to project the expectations and views of the latter on the former. So why bring it up? Why start conversations about it at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 09:41 PM
9

Why are you assuming that the complaints are just coming from women without straight male friends? Most women have straight male friends AND complain about the specific bad behavior of many straight men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 09:34 PM
6

Manipulative people manipulate people. Another strategy is to make people feel needed and important. Plenty of "damsels in distress" eliciting strong emotional responses early on.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 08:31 PM
2

I'm hopeful =/= it's good news for lonely people
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 08:29 PM
2

I don't really get your point. If a guy is only interesting in skinny women, does he think, "the majority of women in the US are overweight or obese, but the good news is that they could lose weight if we changed our entire culture, economic policies, and healthcare system."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 08:02 PM
2

Bad news/good news for whom?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 06:27 PM
4

Social and relational skills. Everyone is becoming less social, but men are becoming much less likely to have long-term friends, which means they aren't practicing conflict resolution and other social skills to the extent that women do. It doesn't help that men tend to have more narrow interests and also do less housework.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 04:46 PM
3

They were having sex young because they were married.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 01:01 PM
5

Are you genuinely saying that all men are currently doing everything they think will make them more successful with women? Men are overweight because they don't think being in shape would improve their success with women?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 12:59 PM
2

You probably think black people should be way nicer to white people, if they like having rights. Their civil rights last only as long as white people allow it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 12:23 PM
11

1- Women did not want to date and have sex as much as they were. There were legal, social, and religious structures that pressured them to. Now they have a choice. 2- Now that women aren't pressured to partner in the same way, they're looking for different qualities in men that they aren't finding. 3- Society is generally more atomized, for a million reasons, including the internet. Men (and women) have fewer friends now, so it shouldn't be surprising that they're dating less too.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 12:17 PM
–

Men have murdered men for wanting to have sex with them, then told the jury that a man even wanting sex was so terrible they went into a panic and aren't responsible for committing murder...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 05:54 AM
–

Men wanting sex isn't gross, but men having sex makes us gross...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 05:51 AM
1

That's not what you've been saying. I asked you if you thought these women thought they were compatible with these men and wanting to get serious with them. You said yes. That's not just wanting a situationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 05:20 AM
1

But even then, you are saying that because they didn't want LESS than a situationship, they must have wanted MORE than a situationship. That doesn't follow. They may have insisted it was a situationship because they wanted a situationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 04:31 AM
1

I'm saying I don't understand why not wanting a more serious relationship makes it not a situationship. That's what a situationship IS.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 03:52 AM
1

What does that have to do with it being a situationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 03:35 AM
1

if I brought up the possibility of the relationship being a FWB instead of a situationship What do you mean? Why would you suggest that?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 01:31 AM
2

All these women consider themselves compatible with these guys? I've known so many women to casually date men who aren't compatible long-term (different ideas about kids, lifestyle, etc), so no one really wanted it to be serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 11:44 PM
1

so subjective and negative that it’s not able to be disproven, which is the nature of a smear. I think you're describing OPs post...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 10:32 PM
4

lol, I'm "smearing" OP by saying their bizarre unfounded assumption was bizarre? Are you under the impression that "bizarre" is some kind of slur?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 10:26 PM
2

however women will call it a situationship even after the fact If it was a situationship at the time, why wouldn't it be a situationship after it was over?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 10:09 PM
2

Why are you equating regret with being used? People regret all kinds of choices (including past relationships and even marriages) that have nothing to do with being used, much less "used for sex." I've regretted sex because it was boring, even though no one was "used." men aren't the gender that complains about non-committal people in the dating pool Men here complain that only 30% of young men are in relationships every day. Even though 70% of young men have been sexually active in the last yea…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 09:47 PM
2

And you could follow the sub rules by posting your "discussion" under the AutoMod comment. But here we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 09:37 PM
–

He's the one posting his manifesto about the labels people use (for connections he's not even a part of) and challenging people to debate him.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 09:25 PM
–

Sure! Some of them might even care almost as much as this guy does!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 09:18 PM
1

Like, a situationship is literally defined as one party hoping or acting like they're in a committed relationship while the other doesn't see it that way Where you getting this??
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 09:13 PM
–

A man makes a whole post about how he would prefer women he's never met to label their interactions with men he's never met, showing how much thought he's put into the meaning of all these labels... You: Women sure care about labels!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 09:02 PM
24

Calling it a situationship implies that one party (usually the woman) wanted more commitment This is a bizarre assumption to make. Most of the times I've heard people say situationship, it's actually been an ex and both parties know they aren't a good fit for the long term. my recommendation to all women in this "situation" is to just refer to the guy as a friend with benefits or fuck buddy, so it sounds more I think you are overestimating how concerned women are with how it "sounds to you."
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 08:52 PM
2

I'm asking you what you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 02:27 PM
3

Then why did you associate attractive mess with youth? They all possess attractiveness, just like women do when they are young. You feel personal chemistry with ALL young women?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 12:03 PM
2

There should definitely be multiple attractive women out there for me, as for any other men. What does attractive mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 03:15 AM
2

Why are you using the term significant other?!? You're talking about a woman you matched with LAST WEEK!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 03:12 AM
–

What's capitalist about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 03:07 AM
1

How?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 02:32 AM
1

So how did you decide yet the root cause of inequity was less socialization, not the patriarchal beauty standards themselves?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 02:31 AM
0

Why did those patriarchal beauty standards not harm men until their transportation options changed?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 11:21 PM
0

WHY is the impact disproportionate?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:51 PM
2

I’m not going to be judgemental, because I’m in that spot. What spot exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 08:26 PM
2

What is your explanation for single women? If relationships are a need, and men are so easy to find, why are there single women?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 08:23 PM
2

But you're saying you don't ask about or care about someone's current drinking habits if they are in therapy, yes?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 07:54 PM
2

So you're fine dating an alcoholic who goes into debt flying to Dubai... as long as they're in therapy for it... That's a choice I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 07:44 PM
2

But my issue is why invite that topic to begin with if you’re mostly not going to like their answer. Because my goal is to bring up potential incompatibilities so I can focus my time and effort on dates I'm compatible with. I'm not trying to sweep issues under the rug so I can date the wrong people longer. Do you ask women you date about their drinking and spending habits to avoid repeating the patterns with your ex? Or do you avoid those topics because you might not like the answers?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 07:39 PM
3

You're leaving out what YOU believe. "Some other people believe that the world is round. I'm not leaving that out." Cool, it seems like you believe something else that is pretty weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 07:02 PM
8

There is absolutely zero hypocrisy here. This is like any another normal criteria for dating. "Do you want kids?" "Oh, I don't want kids, so we're not a good fit and should move on to other people." "What are you in therapy for?" "Oh, I'm not comfortable dating someone struggling with that particular issue, so we're not a good fit." They are asking you questions to determine if you're a good fit. That is what is supposed to happen in early dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 06:58 PM
2

That's what you said another person believes. If they are like you, who think some things can never truly be fixed by therapy
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 06:44 PM
7

believe therapy can change people then revealing the past doesn’t matter. You cannot be serious. If a man tells you he's in therapy to address his sexual attraction to children, you gonna let him babysit? Because his history of molesting kids doesn't matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 06:39 PM
2

i don’t see many opportunities to meet new people - whether it’s for romantic or platonic purposes What do you mean? Are there no events where you live?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 06:28 PM
7

Why would a woman deliberately staying single go to a forum to meet men to date?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 06:18 PM
7

You think these women are going to go to new platforms set up for matchmaking?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 06:13 PM
4

Platforms like what? I literally do not understand what you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 06:07 PM
19

lol... "when I tell women I have a history of being emotionally abusive, they lose interest... they must be judgemental about me being in therapy!" Give me a break.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 06:00 PM
5

I literally don't know, because you won't tell us. What is the path to equal opportunity? How would it happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 05:42 PM
3

Great, pretend it's a date. 100 men want to go on a date with her. What's the path to men having the same opportunity?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 05:39 PM
7

Why won't you answer the question? HOW do you propose making things "fair," if not force?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 05:36 PM
6

men should have as many dating opportunities and options as women do If a 25 year old woman walks into a crowded event, 100 men may be interested in having a one-night stand with her. She has the "opportunity" to have sex with 100 men. What's the path to men having equal opportunity?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 05:11 PM
2

I agree. That's why I asked the question of OP. I can't imagine what he thinks is the cause of the inequality.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 05:04 PM
4

Do you agree with OP that men are not needier than women?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 04:47 PM
3

That impacts men and women, yes? How is it the root cause of inequality?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 04:38 PM
5

These finally influence human behavior (like aggression, sex drive, r propensity to take risks, etc.) This is what I'm asking you about. biology -> behavior -> different dating circumstances What does biology do to men? If not make them "needier" and "more desperate," which OP says is false.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 04:37 PM
5

You're telling me that social media has affected men and women in the same way (inflated standards) AND is what made men and women unequal. You can't think that makes sense?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 04:20 PM
4

So, equal?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 04:13 PM
4

OK, biological differences that do what? Men's Y chromosome makes them do what?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 04:12 PM
7

Both men and women have access to social media. That isn't the root cause.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 04:06 PM
8

Differences that make it much WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENCES I understand that the circumstances are different. What is THE ROOT CAUSE that leads to these different circumstances?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 04:05 PM
12

Differences that do what? OP doesn't seem to think men actually need women more or are more desperate. So what are the actual differences and how do they impact men?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 03:27 PM
20

In your mind, what is the root cause of the structural inequity?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 02:39 PM
9

My impression is that men measure "dating down" according to conventional attractiveness, not professional status or financial resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 02:05 AM
7

Are you saying that it's ok that you intentionally lied, because liberals accurately state the fact that 97% of Planned Parenthood's work is unrelated to abortion? Instead of focusing on the fact that it's hard to find an abortion provider? Because I've been reading about that (and women bleeding out in Texas) plenty.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 07:12 PM
1

If that were what actually mattered, you wouldn't pretend to be upset about tax dollars funding abortion. You are the person who lied.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 06:50 PM
11

But the general conservative argument is to not support companies that engage in practices that they don’t agree with. If that were actually true, you wouldn't lie about it. It’s also interesting how “women’s rights/healthcare” in these arguments begin and end with abortion. It is interesting how you characterize Planned Parenthood by the 3% of their budget you dislike, instead of the other 97% that also supports women's health.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 05:49 PM
–

A small number of very good looking men have unlimited options, while 80-90% of men have absolutely zero. Why in the world do you believe this? What percent of men are in relationships? What percent of men had sex last year?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 02:54 PM
21

Your source: "Since 1977, federal funding hasn't been used for abortions. A budget provision, known as the Hyde Amendment, prohibits the use of federal funds for abortions except in the case of rape, incest or a threat to the pregnant person’s life."
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 02:52 PM
3

"Why do women consider more than 2 qualities when picking a life partner" is a weird question. Sorry, not sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 11:20 PM
–

The women I know "consider them" in the sense that we date until we discover this, or another deal breaker. That's what dating is. You spend time with someone to see if you work together, and break up if you don't. This is like anything else (discovering that someone doesn't do dishes, etc). And so you have to hide your hedonistic crazy sexual past from these men Ha, ha, hard pass.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 11:01 PM
–

Because those aren't the only qualities adults look for in serious partners. People are looking for someone to vacation with their parents, to buy a house with, raise kids with, retire with, be their best friend and emergency contact. There are a million areas to potentially be compatible or incompatible. It's weird that you have to ask this question...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 10:36 PM
3

His reason for lying is to overrule my own decisions about who I have sex with and who I date. This is a fundamentally unsafe situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 08:31 PM
1

Men don't typically ask women for advice on how to be "the most noticed." Men typically ask for advice on how to go from no options to any options. In those cases, changes to grooming can make a difference. A great hair cut doesn't make a guy popular. But a shitty haircut can be a turnoff to the options an average guy could have.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 01:54 PM
–

Have we ever seen a time when there were "social norms against fornication," but women still had equal access to educational opportunities, professional opportunities, and banking? I don't think it's these "norms" that promote egalitarianism FOR MEN, but the systematic legal exclusion of women who don't partner with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 01:46 PM
4

So... you're jealous of them you feel like you're doing them a favor Is that consistently with the rest of your life? When you see a guy who is naturally great at sports, they come easy to him, do you think "I can't respect him?" When you "do favors" for people in the form of social interactions that you enjoy, like spending time with a less popular friend, do you think "I can't respect him?"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 01:31 PM
14

Theres a huge difference between someone else harming you, and choosing to do something yourself. I chose to give someone money =/= I was assaulted when I went out after dark or I was denied access to health care.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 04:53 AM
1

This is the appropriate amount of empathy? actively attack and antagonize them politically and socially- men will be able to boost their mood and self-esteem by doing so.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 09:29 PM
0

The solution is not to cater to these women as leftism claims, but to actively attack and antagonize them politically and socially- men will be able to boost their mood and self-esteem by doing so. Why would that boost your self-esteem?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 09:16 PM
9

a woman he doesn't genuinely find attractive or sees as 'below his league,' it's unlikely that he’ll truly respect her. What does respect mean to you here?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 07:51 PM
105

"Why don't women like it when I call them cum dumpsters?"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 07:28 PM
1

When a woman say "i like nerds" I'm starting to think a lot of the complaining about women's "advice" stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of what advice is. Because this ain't it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 04:48 PM
3

Most lies are for the same reason- to manipulate other people's choices so that you get what you want. That's why guys lie about being not being virgins, or watching porn, or going to strip clubs.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 04:05 PM
6

If there are a bunch of men out there who can be inspired to rape you because of an item of clothing, that's a very reasonable reason to develop a fear of men as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 03:53 PM
2

from being held accountable for what they say and do. This justification often looks like this “Of course it is valid to ghost random men on the, ignore them when they approach you, or treat them poorly to get them to leave u alone even if it’s a little rude it’s ok be rude bc they are dangerous things not people and you should stay safe.” You want people to be "held accountable" for not talking to strangers?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 03:50 PM
3

These are not mutually exclusive. Rational people make decisions by considering risk AND reward. For men, the risks are lower AND the reward is higher. For women, the risks are higher AND the reward is lower. This is not rocket science.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 03:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter