TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Pure_Slice_6119 Archive

View 0 posts and 44 comments by Pure_Slice_6119 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No, in fact, no one will go to jail for neutrality. The real rating is very high and is supported by social and anti-Western policies. Russia has not been an isolated country for a long time, citizens have had time to look at other countries and draw their own conclusions. You can tell me that China is a developed country, but I was there and saw the real standard of living, it is low. You can tell me that the US has better healthcare than Russia, but Russian citizens have access to the Internet…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 03:24 AM
1

All your arguments can be reduced to one phrase - the victims of the 90s were justified. But I don't think so, and the majority of Russian citizens do not think what happened in the 90s was justified. Look at Putin's rating, 78% of the country's citizens trust him and the anti-Western policy in general. I am not the most categorical person in Russia, I have no personal sympathies for the president. Therefore, I trust only the anti-Western policy, point 1 of 2. And this is not a question of propa…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 02:34 AM
1

The country was not terribly poor, it was a miscalculation of European companies. Terribly poor citizens of China were ready to work 16 hours a day for a pack of pasta, because it was better than their agriculture. But Russia had a developed economy, where people worked in factories, and factories complied with labor laws. That is why there were so many alcoholics and suicides in the 90s. People do not commit suicide when everything is fine, but often do it when they see an abyss in front of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 02:10 AM
1

This is not nonsense, if it were true, we would have been richer in the 90s, and China and India would be rich countries. But China and India live in terrible conditions, and in the 90s people lived much worse than in the USSR. I will give a simple example from the life of my family. In 1992, the factory where my grandmother worked was bought by a foreign company from the EU, called it an investment and established irregular working hours without a guaranteed salary. People who worked 8 hours a …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 01:45 AM
1

Let's face it. 1) Gas was found in eastern Ukraine, but Ukraine has no technology to extract it. The war began after Ukraine signed a contract with the US to develop the source. The EU and US plan is to extract gas in Ukraine and control its prices. Do you know the laws of capitalism? Why does Russia need a competitor that lowers gas prices? 2) Let's say they forget about gas in Ukraine. A pro-Western president will come, and Russia will again become a colony, like in the 90s with a miserable st…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 01:11 AM
1

1) No one is discussing a war between Russia and the US simply because the odds are 50/50 and it is pointless. 2) Why does Russia need Eastern Ukraine? Have you thought about it? 3) You might as well say that the only reason Russia hasn't taken over the US is because the US has nuclear weapons. We're back to 50/50 again. 4) If there is a pro-Western person in Russia, Russia will turn into a poor colony, this is obvious, economically justified and tested in practice in the 90s. Therefore, no one …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 12:58 AM
1

And do you seriously believe that if Putin ceases to be president, everything will change? No. There are two ways: either there will be a successor and everything will continue. Or the West will manage to put its puppet in power and then the citizens of Russia will face a catastrophe greater than in the 90s. Personally, I would prefer to live under a dictatorship than in an analogue of India and the 90s. Therefore, I do not believe in the chances of puppets, no one will support a return to the 9…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 12:52 AM
1

1) In terms of military spending, Ukraine has a lot of working Soviet weapons. 2) If Russian technology was crap, Russia would no longer exist. But Russia continues to exist because, no, it is not crap. 3) Old technology is stupid propaganda when in fact there is no other technology. If there was another technology, it would have destroyed Russia long ago. But it did not, simply because it can't. 4) Do you know Russia's real military goals? No, you just believe the propaganda. 5) No, it is not a…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 12:42 AM
1

1) You are too arrogant, it is not about nuclear weapons. The US military is simply smaller than Russia. There are many different factors that give both countries pros and cons, but the overall score is 50/50. 2) You can rent a port, but you can't rent gas.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 12:25 AM
1

1) Even without funding, the hand moves 50/50, and any military person understands this. 2) Have you ever wondered why Russia needs Crimea? I bet you haven't even thought about it. 3) The standard of living of the average Chinese citizen has not been limited in the last 30 years, it has only increased in places where it cannot be otherwise, like in India. In India, the standard of living has also been the same for the last 30 years. This is not worth investing in, it is a slow evolution. In Soma…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 12:10 AM
1

Hunger is not an instinct, hunger is a physiological need. You throw mud at any fact that contradicts your beliefs. Are you 16 years old?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 12:02 AM
1

Academician Pavlov and modern psychotherapy are not pseudoscience.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 11:42 PM
1

You are much more brainwashed than you think. 1) NATO is not the reason. 2) If the US could defeat Russia, they would have done it already, but the US can't. The chances are 50/50 for both countries, and that's too big a risk. 3) You haven't been to China for sure, but I have, since my work for many years was organized with that country. There is no high standard of living there. The only difference between China and India is the sanitary standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 11:41 PM
1

Your persistence in denying official science is astounding. You are now arguing with a fact that any schoolchild in any developed country knows.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 11:30 PM
1

You idealize the standard of living in the EU countries and the attitude of Western countries to Russia. Investments are cheese in a mousetrap, look at India, without strict control from the authorities they are simply building a slave system. You can see the same in China. Investments are not gifts, they are investments in the hope of super-profits, if you pay workers a lot, there will be no super-profits. That is why the standard of living in Russia fell in the 90s, and with the beginning of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 11:28 PM
1

Just talk to your therapist about it, otherwise you will never understand what you are reading. You can ask your biology teacher at school.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 08:23 PM
1

Don't you see the difference between those who are offered a visa and those who are trying to get a marriage visa? She was literally refused for 5 years straight. My father was also offered to go to Germany, but he refused after learning how much medicine would cost there. After the adoption of capitalism in Russia, millions of people committed suicide or became alcoholics. Ironically, it was not capitalism that raised the standard of living, but the dictatorship that began in 2000. And if I liv…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 08:22 PM
1

You can tell these stories to anyone, but not to me. There is no insurance in the US that would cover at least half of the costs of my diagnoses. I am writing to a woman from the US who has the same diagnosis as me. She is from the middle class, works in IT and cannot take out a loan for her own home, because all her money goes to pay hospital bills. Insurance companies cover no more than half of her expenses. Just because you are healthy does not mean that people with health problems are lazy i…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 08:17 PM
1

My mother's cousin left the USSR without any problems, but spent 5 years begging for a visa in Italy. The problem was not the USSR. And no one cared how many people would go with her, your logic seems paranoid. The USSR was not interested in locking up cooks, shop assistants, primary school teachers and other ordinary citizens in the country. Her elderly mother was a teacher and when she became incapacitated, she was also able to leave the USSR without any problems, but she returned because she …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 08:08 PM
1

My family was not connected to the elite, but they had a phone in the house, you are dramatizing reality. And do not try to convince me that the US has better healthcare. I still do not see better healthcare in the US than in Russia. But at least in Russia I do not have to pay $ 30,000 a year for it. This is what is left in Russia from socialism and thanks to it I live. If I was born in the US, I would already be in the trash because of debts to hospitals. You talk about scientists, but stubborn…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 08:02 PM
1

Why are you so sure that no one could leave? I will tell you a terrible secret, you will not be allowed to leave any country in the world if you have access to state secrets of this country. But if you are an ordinary person, then you can leave without any problems. My mother's cousin left for Italy without any problems, she simply married an Italian. It was 1978, she was a cook and also worked in a cafe in Italy. It's just that most people did not need to leave anywhere, they did not even try t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 07:53 PM
1

You don't even understand what you're writing. You read the definition and didn't understand its meaning because you have no education in biology or psychiatry. Any qualified psychotherapist will tell you what an instinct is and why people don't have instincts. I tried to explain it to you, you don't even try to understand. Open a school biology textbook or ask a doctor.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 07:46 PM
1

If the opinion of scientists does not coincide with your opinion, it does not mean that scientists are idiots. You feel hungry, what do you do? You either eat or ignore the hunger. An animal is not able to make such a choice, if there is food in front of the animal, a hungry animal will eat it. The same applies to sexual desire, people control their desires, animals are not capable of this. People do not have instincts.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 07:25 PM
1

My parents are also scientists and they made money in Russia and the USSR without any problems. If a person is smart enough, he will easily make a career in Russia and the USSR. My father received an apartment and a house with a plot of land in the USSR. My family lived well, and if I move to the US or somewhere else now, my standard of living will fall, because no other country will give me so many opportunities. In the US, with my health, I would have gone broke long ago on medicine and would …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 07:15 PM
1

You look more like a flat Earth theorist. Instinct has a precise scientific definition - it is a set of automatic, uncontrolled reactions, not conscious actions. Academician Pavlov was the first to discover this, and no one has refuted it to this day. On the contrary, all modern psychotherapeutic methods of treatment are based on the fact that a person does not have instincts, and these methods work. You do not understand anything about psychiatry and biology, you do not even have school knowled…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 07:09 PM
1

You will be surprised, but in Afghanistan the standard of living is lower than in Somalia. And in North Korea it is the same as in Moldova. There is no hunger in North Korea. And do not talk about what you do not know, that a person has no instincts, this is a scientifically proven fact. This is the official scientific position, it is strange that you did not learn about this in biology lessons at school. In any developed country, children study biology in schools.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 06:37 PM
1

Pohemy ia dolgna werit v vahy istoriu? - If you are really from Russia, you will understand what I wrote and will be able to answer my question. If you cannot read it, you are lying. And do not compare Moscow and most regions. Besides, statistics are an indisputable thing, only a few immigrated from Russia. Much more people leave, for example, Finland, from modern Finland.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 06:31 PM
0

And by this logic, they should have a birth rate like in Afghanistan, but they have it below the replacement level. So it's not about contraception, there are some other reasons. And the psychological connection with children is obvious. The stronger the attachment to children, the fewer children. In poor countries, the psychological attachment to a child is lower due to the protective mechanism of the psyche. In marginal families, there is no psychological connection due to some mental problems…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 05:24 PM
1

You think these countries are better, but they are not. Have you been to China? They work literally 12 hours a day, seven days a week, and many of them still live in villages with no running water, it is an absolutely terrible standard of living. The only reason their healthcare has not collapsed is because they are a young country. China does not even have labor laws regulating working hours. But I live in Russia, when the USSR fell apart, foreign companies were trying to make Russia the second…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 03:37 PM
1

The capitalist economy works as long as there are poor countries whose population is ready to work in factories for a minimum wage for the maximum number of hours a day. Look at where any product of capitalist countries is produced, most of it is produced in poor, backward countries, this makes the cost of goods cheaper and gives the owners of the companies super profits. The socialist economy does not need poor third world countries for its production, this makes socialism more autonomous. And …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 08:22 AM
1

There is no legal contraception in North Korea, and they don't give birth to 5-6 children per woman, this theory doesn't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 08:10 AM
4

In Africa, the attitude to life and death is completely different. This does not mean that people there are cruel, no, they just cannot change anything in their family and the human psyche turns on the defense mechanism - if you can't prevent it - don't pay attention. This psychology worked all over the world until the beginning of the 20th century. If most of your children do not survive and you spend fewer resources on them until they are 7 years old, you think less about their future. If peop…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 03:03 AM
12

In Afghanistan, wars happen more often than in Russia and Ukraine, but this does not reduce the birth rate. The reason for the decline in the birth rate in Eastern Europe is the same as in the West. The higher the price of human life, the fewer children. Before contraception and advanced medicine, the death rate was as high as the birth rate. No one cared for children as they do now, children worked in dangerous industries with their parents. Now people have few children and invest a lot of reso…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 02:47 AM
1

Read the text of the post, she is accused of allowing her husband to harm women. This is absurd, even if her husband did harm someone, he did not need her permission to do so. Criminals do not ask permission when they commit crimes. But any crime must have evidence, not just gossip in the media.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 11:49 PM
1

Where is the legal evidence for these allegations? There is none. And Mel Gibson will continue to act in films because he is straight, despite all his legal troubles. But I don’t care about either of them. The story of Kamala Harris, who suffered without evidence, as did Ezra Miller, is even more bullshit. You can continue to ignore the obvious. This is what conservative patriarchal heterosexuals do. They cancel women and LGBT people, they just destroy the competition. I don’t care about actors,…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 11:05 PM
1

Ezra Miller has had fewer legal problems than most straight celebrities. There are plenty of celebrities who have had worse problems, and unlike Miller, there is real evidence against them. But no one cancels these people. Ezra Miller had an altercation with his mother's tenants in her house because he didn't know about them. The media turned that story into a lie and made it famous. And that's the only story that is based on an actual legal document that was published. But why hasn't anyone can…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 10:31 PM
1

Look at how cancel culture works, even among celebrities. Ozzy Osbourne almost killed his wife and got arrested? That was a long time ago, let's put him in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. Tommy Lee beat his wife and went to jail for it? Let's make a movie about him and make money off of it. Those are just badass rockers! They did shit and now they're making money off of autobiographical movies and the media won't talk about it. Straight men are not subject to cancel culture. Kamala Harris is a w…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 06:47 PM
1

Was her husband formally charged and brought to trial? Or did all the charges begin when she decided to take power? The truth is that charges without evidence are legally meaningless, but they are effective reputation killers. Her reputation was killed, while Biden's reputation was not damaged, despite real legal evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 06:13 PM
1

Of all these stories, Ezra Miller interested me the least, I was more interested in the allegations against Kamala Harris, and I found no real evidence of her corruption. I looked up Ezra after reading a similar article, and I also found no evidence. Literally, the media has no evidence of what they write. And they distort the facts even if they have them. Ezra Miller stole bottles of alcohol from a couple in Hawaii? No, the police released other documents, he stole two bottles of alcohol from h…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 03:42 PM
0

She wants a divorce because of the media, which has not provided any evidence for their words? But if he cheated on her, you can't know whether she believes it or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 03:28 PM
-1

Is there any legal evidence of her husband's guilt?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 03:07 PM
2

This is a media article where is the link to the court website or even a photo of this warrant? The same thing was written about Kamala Harris, accusations without documents to support these accusations. But when Biden's white heterosexual son was brought to trial and his father himself, as a legal entity, admitted it, no one cared. I wrote exactly this, people believe the media and they don't need any evidence if they are women or non-binary. This site provided no evidence for what it wrote. Yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 03:05 PM
1

Is it her fault that he cheated on her in marriage? This argument is a favorite argument of conservative patriarchal people. Your husband is cheating on you? You yourself are to blame for his cheating! You are a bad person and a bad wife. Good wives have husbands who do not behave inappropriately! - this is nonsense that has no place in the 21st century, but it is there...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 02:41 PM
1

The only thing that bothers me about all of these stories is that none of the accusers have provided any evidence. Kamala Harris is corrupt? Where are the courts and the evidence? Hillary Clinton is corrupt, where is the evidence? And why should she be held accountable for her husband's behavior? Ezra Miller is a groomer? Where are the courts and the evidence? When the press writes something bad about women and non-binary people, no one needs evidence. But try writing something about a straight …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 02:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter