TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

PurpleLilac22 Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by PurpleLilac22 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Any pre-menopause, remotely normal looking woman can be sexually attractive to a man. Women however -because of how biologically wired we are, have much more difficulty reaching orgasm (this disparity is well documented). Basically we need the right kind of man, the right of looks/phenotypes for us to be attracted (and thus have any chance of actually enjoying it). And because evolution is not perfect but simply "functional", very few males actually fit the bill, unfortunately. Men have it so mu…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/16 09:06 AM
1

No. I don't think so. If that were the case there would be no issue with incels. I also think if men got the same validation from masturbating as from sex with a woman then we'd be extinct as men, en masse, would just masturbate rather than have to jump through hoops for sex. So if it's sex that's needed to validate himself (really, how can your instincts even differentiate between jerking off and sex...I mean, isn't that why men jerk off?) that is: if he really can instinctively make the differ…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/16 04:35 AM
1

Yeah okay, it's all because of blue pillers and feminists. I'm sure misogyny help your case /s
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/16 03:33 AM
2

You can't really prove that premise, and the only reason you're accepting it is because it suits you as a means to rationalize your hateful attitude towards incels. Like many "incels", you seem to be confusing sexual indifference or sexual revulsion for active hatred. You're completely butchering the meaning of the word hatred in doing so. Here's how it works: when we see an unattractive man, we're not repulsed because he is "incel"; we're not even wondering if he is incel. We're sexually repuls…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/16 03:19 AM
1

On the subject of so called 100% straight males: http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2015/08/why-straight-men-have-sex-with-each-other.html?wpsrc=nymag
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 09:48 PM
5

Pretty much nailed it. Also sexuality is quite fluid, and straight men do often resort to homosexual sex in certain situations. That's true. It's no more unrealistic to tell men to try their luck with other men then to tell women to lower their standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 09:33 PM
2

Female "incels" don't experience the rather painful realization of not being good enough That "realization" is simply men's evaluation of their SMV being brought down to more realistic levels. That's not the problem. The problem is it was over inflated. Of course the deflation process is likely going to be painful, I'm not gonna deny that. Again, the problem is the over inflation and also why it got there in the first place. Instead of blaming and envying women because their average SMV is inher…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 09:04 PM
3

So you wouldnt feel disgusted cuddling with another woman? No? I cuddle with other girls regularly lol. To be honest, given the choice, I'd much rather have sex with another woman than with a non attractive man. So technically I'm not 100% hetero (though given the choice between a hot guy and a woman I'd choose the hot guy so I guess I'm strongly hetero).
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 08:51 PM
3

I agree with everything you said apart from the last paragraph. Just because most men in the past didn't reproduce, it doesn't mean they don't have the biological drive to reproduce. While mother nature doesn't care if they do reproduce, internally their own biological drives are still pushing them to have sex. If they achieve the sex with a woman and shoot their sperm in her vagina they will receive the internal validation for a job well done. In terms of the validation, it doesn't actually mat…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 08:45 PM
3

That's weird. As a straight woman, I don't feel the least bit disgusted by other women (regardless of their attractiveness I might add); they just don't attract me sexually. The only time I seen people being downright disgusted with the same sex where the odd cases of repressed homosexuality (often times male because there seen to be more of a taboo for male homosexuality in our society than female homosexuality which is pretty dumb).
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 06:48 AM
2

Well, probably not. Sperm banks (and ultimately, their customers) usually have above average genetic qualities demands for donors. So a dood who can't even genetically cut it irl likely will be immediately rejected on the base of his genetic qualities (or lack thereof). Not that this is a bad thing or anything. Just saying it's probably not a realistic option.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 05:03 AM
3

From an evolutionary point of view, if you're a man who can't have sex your genes will die out. N-ooo..! Not your genes ( ﾟДﾟ) !!! Seriously, so what? We have laws against murder but er, there's no laws that says it's some injure to an individual to not pass on their genes. We're here because of past selective pressures. Human exists because some individuals reproduced successfully and some didn't. Part of sexual selection, evolution and sexual reproduction is about some individuals (mostly male…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 04:44 AM
1

No, the comparison doesn't make sense. Gays were historically systematically persecuted and event systematically killed in the not too distant past (WW2). Virgins were not. Really not sure what it is with terpers and false equivalencies...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 04:05 AM
2

Are you really suggesting that male incels should just "have sex" with each other? Is it your suggestion that male incels should solve this problem by rubbing their penises in or on each other, on other male incels? The OP is deconstructing the flawed and hypocritical argument mentioned above, and doing a pretty good job imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 03:55 AM
5

When a self-identified female incel tries to talk about her experiences online she often gets shut down by male incels lining up to tell her she has no right to complain since somebody is always willing to have sex with her, and even if she doesn't find that person attractive she is still better off than a male incel who no woman will touch. I find the whole "incel" term a bit ridiculous because usually it's pretty much applied to loser-males neckbeards who are shooting above their genetic SMV b…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/16 03:51 AM
1

Ok so feminists, how is a man supposed to prove an encounter was consensual? You tell us, how DID men managed, before the advent of internet and portable cams? Personally, I'd be kind of weary of someone who was constantly worried of being falsely accused. I mean, that's...not exactly something most men worry about... Also, men who don't sexually assault and or rape tend to not have those accusations made against them. (I know I know"but muh false accusations" etc )
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 04:15 AM
1

I think encouraging consent culture (especially sexual but also other form of consent) is good? "Oh no, moar consent!" What will these devilish EssJayDoubleU and feminists come up next? Also, moral relativism is bunk. If a culture value consent more than another, then that culture is superior in that regard.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/16 03:57 AM
1

Yup. The sooner we do away with this oppressive institution the better we are as a group.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 11:34 PM
1

Yes, I am obessed with handsome, tall, chiseled men. Well, sorry. I hope you come to term one day with your feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 06:49 PM
1

You seem to have a quite the obsession with handsome, chiseled men. They're mentioned in nearly all of your posts. As a straight woman, I can assure you, most men are indeed average as shit (I WISH there were nothing but hot good looking men alas...), and most of those men have GFs. You only notice the tall, good looking ones because that's what catches your attention for some reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 04:10 PM
1

And honestly, what is the alternative? Undesirable men get government issued sex slaves to bear their children? Traditionally, marriage is not too far from that actually...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 03:54 PM
1

Do you believe that the increasing amount of sexual freedom given to Western women is a positive factor in society overall? Not only is it a good thing but if women weren't sexually selective in our evolutionary past, we wouldn't be humans. A lot of human-specific characteristics are a direct result of mate selection (done by females). Patriarchy did its best to try to remove female sexual agency by imposing monogamy/marriage but thankfully, it is still relatively recent enough in our evolution …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 03:44 PM
1

Because a lot of people are dumb. You could also add to that list lower pay at equal work, higher risk of being a victim of spousal sexual violence etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 03:29 PM
3

Good analogy. The same is true for women except we feel there's a lot more sexually repulsive men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 03:07 PM
1

I don't really judge men in terms of "alphas" or "betas" but yes, a really good looking guy can sometimes be intimidating. Fortunately sometimes one will approach
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/16 02:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter