TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Purple_Hat_51 Archive

View 0 posts and 24 comments by Purple_Hat_51 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Yes I agree but the class based division exists everywhere doesn’t it? and we would like to disentangle the effects of gender from class. Certainly there are some countries where gender matters more and gender is specific in certain directions of privilege. Class-based Exists in Afghanistan Exists in The US Gender In Afghanistan according to all evidence clearly favoring males (of course there are still specific drawbacks to being a male there e.g. when being forced to become a soldier I suppose…
/r/MensRights09/08/26 06:47 AM
0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_in_Afghanistan None of your claims are supported by any evidence. All evidence points to the fact that men raping women in Afghanistan is rarely prosecuted and on the contrary women are often charged with adultery. https://edition.cnn.com/2026/03/01/asia/taliban-afghanistan-domestic-violence-legal https://www.unwomen.org/en/news-stories/press-release/2025/08/afghanistan-ten-facts-about-the-worlds-most-severe-womens-rights-crisis In your specific case just be aw…
/r/MensRights09/08/26 06:02 AM
1

https://www.unwomen.org/en/news-stories/press-release/2025/08/afghanistan-ten-facts-about-the-worlds-most-severe-womens-rights-crisis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape\_in\_Afghanistan https://edition.cnn.com/2026/03/01/asia/taliban-afghanistan-domestic-violence-legal
/r/MensRights09/08/26 05:58 AM
-10

There are many forms of discrimination. Just because women are not tried for this specific act doesn’t mean they are not utterly mistreated in Afghanistan.
/r/MensRights08/08/26 08:52 PM
25

Well you don’t have to go through periods or pregnancies for example. Those exert heavy tolls on the body. Further, In many countries men are also still systematically advantaged and in power and women totally oppressed (think taliban ruled Afghanistan for instance). So overall, if we think globally, there are quite some still. But that doesn’t mean there is no discrimination against men and men’s rights are not important. I can write essays about that too.
/r/MensRights08/08/26 07:57 PM
40

As a 5.6 guy I can tell you life is rough. I mean looks are mostly often defined by height for men. I genuinely think short men might be the most disadvantaged group in society but no one will acknowledge
/r/MensRights30/07/26 04:58 PM
1

Wow this conversation shows everything that’s wrong with women. Comes here to debate men’s rights issues as a feminist activist and the only guy she keeps interacting is one who ‘boldly’ sexualizes her.
/r/MensRights05/07/26 02:08 PM
37

100% and by a long shot.
/r/MensRights05/07/26 10:57 AM
1

Agreed. I find this comment weird. My question to you would be why feminists not more broadly acknowledge the insane amount of progress and in parts overcorrection that was achieved in western countries? As well as not the real existing discrimination against men. On overcorrection: There are many scientific studies finding woke hiring discrimination against men but not against women anymore. In some sectors, like academia, specifically strongly so. In all care work and female dominated sectors …
/r/MensRights04/07/26 10:35 AM
3

I appreciate your post I think it shows good faith in rational discussion. However I just cannot comprehend it. Could you reformulate?
/r/MensRights10/06/26 07:17 PM
2

Dude, men’s rights all the way. There are plenty of studies that document real existing discrimination against men and we should demand attention to these issues. However this is a sweeping sexist generalisation and blame that I believe has no place in men’s rights. This only reminds me of the also existing unfortunately radical extremist feminists who call for the extinction or population control of men or some nonsense like this.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 04:25 AM
2

Unfortunately this is not how it works. These feminists will not give up their position on these matters —- they create identity, social standing and benefits for themselves around this. In this there are no different than the (probably way in the past actually existing) patriarchy that they criticise. The benefitting parties hardly ever move to the side themselves. All the data is there and I can tell you I still have to sit through meeting after meeting where women freely constantly assert tha…
/r/MensRights15/05/26 09:08 AM
4

Hi I can confirm this from experience and you can see for yourself here the data in Swiss starter grant funding were women have 2x to 3x better chances (the starter grant is basically a fast track to a tenured position) scroll down to statistics. …… https://www.snf.ch/en/w728UqT1Yw256Mz2/funding/careers/snsf-starting-grants
/r/MensRights14/05/26 05:27 PM
22

Absolutely, but it is still a systemic impact on men. If it were sectorally the other way around, there would 100% a huge cry out how women are affected by the transition.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 05:21 AM
1

Yes, I can tell from a experience. I am a man in social science in Switzerland. Acceptance rates for funding etc and for jobs are far higher for female applicants. There is public data on this but no one talks about it yet. (So far) for example all the Swiss big funding vehicles have 2x to 3x better acceptance rates for female applicants
/r/MensRights11/05/26 05:41 AM
7

Holy shit I just read the first paragraphs of the misandry page and it immediately downplays it. The crazy thing is it claims there is no widespread misandry anywhere lacking total evidence. But it cites three outdated book chapters and no actual studies. It goes without saying that widespread discrimination of boys and men in schools and other institutions is now supported by a lot of empirical evidence and the mutilation of course too? Can we try to change this article? But honestly Wikipedia …
/r/MensRights07/05/26 10:58 AM
3

Yes women do eat less. Typical male is around 2500-3000 calories a day or so and most women eat only around 2000. Less body mass requires less energy
/r/MensRights31/03/26 05:22 AM
2

Yeah I was thinking the same actually just earlier. I agree. Over a year this compounds.
/r/MensRights31/03/26 05:21 AM
26

WTF. How can a person be that vile and so much believe they are good?
/r/MensRights30/03/26 05:10 PM
63

Yes wtf? It’s more expensive to be a woman? Holy shit. Just some costs with periods. Wow this thread is crazy
/r/MensRights30/03/26 05:09 PM
5

It’s because the system favours these men to go up
/r/MensRights15/03/26 06:39 PM
9

Just to be clear boys, average size is more like 5.1 inches according to scientific studies. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_penis_size
/r/MensRights27/02/26 11:27 AM
1

Ok yes perhaps that. It’s good to be objective for both sides. It’s unlikely no gender will be unaffected. But it’s probably equally wrong to frame it only as female disadvantages again. That’s what I was trying to say.
/r/MensRights19/02/26 04:38 PM
39

What the heck? Software engineering and so forth are all male dominated. And to the contrary many jobs that are female dominated, like cleaning services and nursing, are so far pretty safe from AI.
/r/MensRights18/02/26 09:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter