TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Purple_Serpent Archive

View 1 posts and 80 comments by Purple_Serpent on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-13

I've been a red piller for a week, but I'm already on my way out. Now, the red pill theory is completely solid. And understanding it will change my life for the better. But red pillers are just a bunch of assholes. They were probably assholes before they heard of the red pill and they're still assholes now and they'll always be assholes. The only difference is that now they think they have something (the Red Pill) that legitimizes their behavior. So /r/TheRedPill is just one big asshole magnet. …
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 01:56 AM
2

I wish this was upvoted more. To me, this is what I'd like the Red Pill community to really be about. The underpinning of the Red Pill and it's growing support is the fact that it is clearly based on truth, whereas a lot of what we used to believe has now been revealed to be clearly false. But it's starting to look like a lot of people are now using that as an excuse to promote their own pet theories or principles, simply because their theory is similar to those that have been actually demonstra…
/r/TheRedPill06/06/14 04:17 PM
32

And as a guy with naturally beta tendencies this is exactly what I'm looking for. Frankly, I don't give a rat's ass what people who've had naturally alpha tendencies their entire life have to say. I'm on here because "betas" have finally figured out what makes alphas so successful (which natural alphas often don't even understand themselve). And it's the experiences and techniques from the "betas" that I want to hear more about. Why do people hate TRP? It's because it's a bunch of betas trying t…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 07:19 PM
2

Are you for real?
/r/MensRights25/04/14 10:15 AM
5

I'm sorry but this is nothing short of shocking. I'm no doctor, but it sounds like this program would have had a chance to save that guy's life: The purposes of the WISEWOMAN program are: 1) assuring that cardiovascular screening is provided to women ages 40-64 who are participants in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP); 2) working with community-based organizations to provide evidence-based prevention services to those women in need of them (through agreeme…
/r/MensRights01/02/14 04:18 AM
1

Pedofile priests. Crusades. Witches. There's tons more but that should be enough to prove you wrong. religion doesn't bring morality. It only brings hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 10:22 PM
5

Can we name series where no man was slapped by a woman because she was emotionally upset? Every time I see that, I it just makes me want to throw away the entire series.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 10:14 PM
2

From my perspective, it's pretty simple. If someone has an expectation of privacy from worldwide public scrutiny, they should be able to retain that level of privacy no matter what happens on reddit. So public figures and people who have already been publicized through other media is fair game. People's personal blogs, facebook pages, obscure website with very few users etc... They are off limits if they give identifying information. And the rules are really clear, I don't know why that's hard t…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 07:04 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/wiki/faq#wiki_is_posting_personal_information_ok.3F Her full name is visible from that blog as well as pictures. That rule exists specifically for cases like this where the person is susceptible to be on the wrong end of a witch hunt.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 04:09 AM
8

You have to read until the end: You can slap a man, because they can’t slap you back. If a man slaps a woman, that’s abuse. If a woman slaps a man, its adorable/sexy/challenging/strong/feisty/I SLAP YOU BECAUSE I LOVE YOU. The whole concept of feminism lies in the idea of equality: the ladyslap being lorded as a form of empowerment via female on male violence is equitable to misandry, and that my chums is totally bollocks. In summary, slapping is not ok.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 12:57 AM
1

Remove the link to her blog right away. This is against reddit rules. It can get you banned. And if we get too many of these it can get the whole subreddit banned too.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 10:58 PM
5

Having to pay flood insurance when you live in the middle of the desert is ridiculous. Having to pay for health insurance when you're not immortal isn't ridiculous. And in a society that takes care of its own, it is downright humane. A lot of the extra cost comes from pregnancy and birth. I don't know how much of it and there's no way we'll know much about it for a few years because there's millions of dollars being spent right now to spread misinformation and to vilify Obamacare. So if your int…
/r/MensRights23/10/13 10:46 PM
3

Read the whole article. They start with the real Men's Rights position. The formatting is a little shitty and the header is absurd. But fromt he context it is really clear that the section describes what feminists think MRA is and not what people who identify as MRAs think it is.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 03:18 AM
0

Because posts like MRB2012's is exactly what /r/bestof is not about. It's about new, interesting, creative and/or genuinely insightful comments. MRB2012's is just simply a biased debunking of an article that's biased the other way. And yet, MRAs will routinely bestof and upvote these kinds of posts and the mods got sick of it and banned the whole subreddit. Just for added evidence that /r/bestof is not anti-mra. I just went on there to see if they had a post linking to feminist stories and the l…
/r/MensRights22/09/13 08:34 PM
1

Unexplained means exactly that. Unexplained. It doesn't mean that it is caused by discrimination. In any case. It's kinda besides the point. The real point is in the distinction between fairness and equality. Fairness is what we should strive for. If you're a lazy slob who doesn't want to learn any productive skills. You don't deserve equal rewards as someone who works his ass off productively. Feminism today is trying to sweep fairness under the rug and only focus on equality. If women are doin…
/r/MensRights08/09/13 08:31 PM
1

I guess you could say that the tl;dr is: We do need fight today's feminist philosophy. But the way to fight it is to just explain our position in a way that mainstream feminists will understand. And that position is: today, patriarchy hurts men more than it hurts women. All because patriarchy expects men to sacrifice themselves for society and expect women to get everything they need without having to work hard. And that's what patriarchy is doing to us today, it's time for "real feminists" to s…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 08:25 PM
1

women cost more in no small part because of pregnancy. And I find it entirely reasonable that the healthcare costs related to pregnancy are split evenly. That said I think gender discrimination in car insurance should be illegal. If there are things that men do that make them more prone to serious accidents, insurance companies should find ways to identify those people that do those things in a gender indiscriminate way. Imagine the uproar if insurance companies charged more for being asian.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 10:07 PM
5

No they'll just hire more people into the riot unit so they can have enough qualified people to do the actual job, while the rest stay in the back, looking pretty.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 09:26 PM
-1

No she doesn't from start to finish, she frames it as female stupidity. The first frame is the setup. That's how she thinks. The second is the contrast: guys would never think like that. Everything else is to lead up to the punch line that highlights how ridiculous women look when they get all hyper excited over their wedding ring. Nothing about this is really sexist against men, except the first frame where she displays both hypoagency and the fact that she is aware of that hypoagent tendency a…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 10:44 PM
23

I'm sorry but I entirely agree with the entire article. And I don't really see her blaming men or the patriarchy for anything in there. The entire article is about hypoagency. The real problem with feminism is that they blame men for women not getting what they want. They basically expect men to be the strong ones that have to take care of women. They expect men to be the responsible ones. That's why anti-rape campaigns are asking men to fix it. That's why men are forced to pay for mother's live…
/r/MensRights17/08/13 10:12 AM
2

It's not. The main difference between Feminism and Men's Rights right now is that Feminism is in power and can do no wrong, politically speaking. Whereas Men's Rights is an underdog and any sign of injustice will be scrutinized and attacked from all sides, including inside the movement. As Men's Rights gains more power so will those who want men supremacy. Exactly the same way that those wanting women's supremacy have gained power and legitimacy from inside the feminism movement. But the Men's R…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 10:43 PM
2

I know you're already getting flak for requiring people to use "np." But you should also be open to using alternatives like was pointed out by porygon2guy. The fact is, for whatever reason, comments linked from MensRights get downvoted a lot more than comments linked from SRS. And that's why we need to be a lot more diligent about it. If you have the best intentions in the world, but cut corners when rules and conventions are concerned. When evil people are respecting those rules to a T. You wil…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 09:23 PM
0

This needs to be upvoted more. I've seen that even np. links get brigadded from here. If you want to blame SRS you can say they specifically downvote anything linked from this subreddit in order to get it banned (I wouldn't put it passed them). I've only looked at redditlog.com but it seems really good. It even mangles the URL so you can just change the domain to get at the source. That means only extremely dedicated brigadiers would downvote and only SRS would put so much effort into something …
/r/MensRights14/08/13 09:07 PM
2

The problem is that the "feminism" that "good" feminists support already has a name. It's called Human Rights. The only reason to call yourself a feminist is because you want to put the focus on women's problems above and beyond everyone elses.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 09:27 PM
5

The other side's view point is that girls get "harassed" by assholes while guys get punched by assholes. And yet I'm not seeing any posters explaining to guys that it's not ok to punch people.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 03:17 PM
3

Exactly what I was looking for. I think it's fair for men and women to pay the same, but they should both get the same value out of it. That list has a whole lot of completely unacceptable gender discrimination: The biggest one IMO is the Domestic and personal violence screening and conseling. It should be for everyone, not just women. Another terrible one is the "well-woman visit" where some comes to visit you to help you setup a health care plan and give advice on a bunch of stuff. It is ridic…
/r/MensRights31/07/13 10:05 PM
1

There isn't a health insurance plan out there that doesn't cover pregnancy costs. That's the whole point of Obamacare. And the total of things it covers for women costs more than the total of things it covers for men. And that's what men pay for.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 09:49 PM
1

It's not just a sentence, she basically abandoned him.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 07:24 PM
1

Just to be clear that's not Misogynist. And from your description it's not even sexists if you use the word in the same sense as racist. It's just traditionalist. And traditionalist values are often worse on men then on women. You've got your blinders on if you read these descriptions on how men are somehow the source of all problems and then say it's Misogynist.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 06:21 PM
-1

There are men who have been sent to jail for not paying child support when they earn less than what they owe in child support. There are innocent men whose lives were ruined due to insufficient protection for accused rapists. Men die on the job 10-50 times more often than women. Men die 10-15 years earlier than women. Men are driven to suicide much more frequently than women. And there's sooo much more stuff like that. And yet, somehow people like you find the way to bring this disingenuous bull…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 01:39 AM
2

Men's rights has a dogma of perpetual currently increasing victimization where feminists (note: feminsts, NOT women) are responsible for men's problems, and they perceive any attempt to dispute that as an attack as coming from someone who is confused/misled/misinformed/hypocritical. All the parts that make feminism terrible in our view are not actually present in your flipped version. Feminist is not the same as Women. We think that Feminists cause unfair problems for men. We don't think women i…
/r/MensRights22/06/13 01:48 PM
1

It's not lack of conviction. It's the opposite. He has a strong conviction of the kind of person he wants to be and he sticks with it even though staying that way means that he won't get as much out of society as he would like. And he's not "whining" and doing a "song and dance". He's just providing his own very relevant anecdote on how the fact that society seems to have stopped caring about what men want means that most men can't get what they want anymore.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 01:52 PM
0

The people who are responding to you will usually have already formed their opinion, but there are 10-100 times as many people reading but not writing who will form opinions based on what they read. Also, I don't understand how so many feminists somehow believe that feminism is about equality. Feminism is about women that's why it starts with "Feminin" you will never achieve equality through feminism. And these days feminism will actually reduce equality in many areas. If you really want equalit…
/r/MensRights13/06/13 06:44 PM
3

Read the article. It's actually a lot closer to half. So there's not really that much more female victims than male victims.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 01:18 AM
8

First, the submission headline is wrong: Almost half of acid attacks in 2011 were against men (47%) and 42% were against men in 2012. So if you were going to approximate that much, you'd be better off saying that half of acid attacks are against men. Secondly, I'll reiterate what two other MRAs have said, just because I can't believe how you got upvoted so much. One of the biggest problem that the Men's Rights movement has is the invisible victimization of And this is an example. Everyone not li…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 01:17 AM
15

If a news article says "6 office workers died in a freak accident today" then all 6 were males. If there were women among them they would have pointed it out, because it's more tragic when women die: "6 office workers, including two women, died in a freak accident today". That's the sexism in it. And that kind of thinking is extremely prevalent and goes largely unnoticed. It basically implies that men's lives are just not that important but women's lives are. Most of the time, there is no reason…
/r/MensRights05/02/13 08:46 PM
2

Yep, that's what it looks like when they're not afraid to appear sexist.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 11:36 PM
4

It reads like: Don't treat your husband like a slave, it demoralizes him. Treat him like a servant instead.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 02:32 AM
2

Step 1: Throw out all other people's expectations. They all have ideas on how you should live your life. Fuck them. You make your life what you want it to be as best you can by using the hand you've been dealt. Don't worry about what you can't do, focus on what you can do and on learning how to make that list longer. Step 2: Get better. Take your time. But never stop. Don't worry about what you can't be. Focus on what you know you can make happen by the end of the day, by the end of the month, b…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 01:36 PM
2

I don't even know who Warren is. My point is that your statement: "If so, and if OuiCrudites is correct when he says "Feminism is a hateful supremacist movement that actually doesn't even respect women, let alone men", then it follows necessarily that Warren Farrell is a hateful supremacist that actually doesn't even respect men." Is false. And I have already explained why.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 02:14 PM
3

No, it does not. It is very easy to belong to a movement that goes against your moral code when you either, don't understand the impact the movement has, or don't what it's advocating, or earnestly believe its lies. Note that none of these reasons are enough to completely morally excuse someone who supports an immoral movement but they do exculpate partially and are enough to say that a person's moral code can indeed be very different from whichever groups that person supports.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 07:57 AM
2

People often become MRAs because they feel bullied by the women in their lives. This is a resource that helps people victims of bullying. And it's not gender biased!
/r/MensRights30/12/12 07:47 AM
3

Having lived in both Germany and the US, I think this is primarily caused by social security, specifically health care. In the US, money (rarely, but often enough) makes the difference between life and death, and also sometimes (friend of a friend kinda thing) makes the difference between a healthy life and a chronically ill life. When you live in an environment like that, money takes on a completely different meaning. In Germany, it's completely different. In Germany, you get money because you …
/r/MensRights28/12/12 08:39 PM
1

There are sooo many things wrong with what you said that I don't even know where to begin. Most women are not misandrists. Did you really just compare women to bears? You refuse to pander to the minority? And by minority you mean those few (according to you) women who are not misandrists. You refuse to show them respect because of all the other women who are misandrists? Seriously, that's your stance?
/r/MensRights28/12/12 07:14 PM
-5

You're practically advocating for murder in response to property theft and child custody disagreement. I hope it's not against the rules to claim that you're an amoral dipshit.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 09:57 AM
7

The man's decision to have sex with a woman does result on responsibility to the father. The point here is that this responsibility should be equal to that of the woman which is: he is responsible for the welfare of the child up to 18-21 years old if he chooses to be a a father of the child, or he is responsible for the price of an abortion if he chooses to relieve himself of parental responsibilities. If the father has offered to pay for an abortion but the woman then chooses to go through with…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:43 PM
2

At least it's not being upvoted too much. But honestly, I am very disappointed by the anti-woman streak of the subreddit. Maybe I just wasn't paying attention, but it feels like it really wasn't like that a few months ago when I started reading this subreddit more regularly.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 10:20 PM
2

"Women have more health needs than men" then why do they live longer than men? I understand that the shorter lifespan of men may be caused by their own decisions, but to favor women's healthcare when men have a shorter lifespan seems a bit ridiculous. It should at minimum be equal spending. In addition there should be some effort into determining the causes of the reduced lifespan and work to eliminate or reduce those cause.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 12:23 AM
2

What problems did it present well? All I saw was a couple of statistics surrounded by a ton of conjecture, baseless accusations and victim blaming. Which, in turn, makes me doubt the credibility of their statistics.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 05:17 PM
1

Yep it's totally a right wing hit piece with victim blaming included. Oh you're poor and need government hand out? Well maybe you shouldn't have been such a disgusting lowlife drug addict!
/r/MensRights25/11/12 05:10 PM
3

The context doesn't change at all the meaning of the phrase. It is very clear here that this article is trying to show, among other things, how we need to take better care of women who leave their husband behind to keep working under (actual or perceived) risk of radiation poisoning.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 03:28 PM
1

/r/funny is that way --> Over here at /r/mensrights we have a credibility problem and it really doesn't help when people misrepresent a woman's traumatic experience caused by medical malpractice and then joke about it.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 08:54 PM
2

First of all, I don't think that "rape as we normally use the word" is really at the heart of feminism's objection to men's right. I thought "patriarchy" was the heart of feminism's objection to men's right. Secondly, the point I was making is exactly that the women talking about birth rape are NOT using the word rape as we normally use the word. They are using it strictly to mean violation not of a sexual nature. They use the term rape because they believe it will help their audience understand…
/r/MensRights24/11/12 08:42 PM
0

The definitions of words change as people start using it in different contexts. Deal with it.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 07:47 PM
3

Read the article and maybe you'd see that this is not really about "rape" as we normally us the word, but is more about a serious problem with medical malpractice. Which makes your joke extremely insensitive.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 07:42 PM
15

That is not what the article is about at all. It's about terrible bed side manners to the point of abuse. It's about ignoring a patient's medical decisions. I'm glad that at least the top two posts are saying how this IS a serious issue that shouldn't be trivialized. Granted, calling it "rape" is kinda ridiculous. If things happened as she described it, this was way worse than rape.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 07:40 PM
98

I will second that sentiment. Fighting for the Men's Rights cause is difficult and emotionally expensive. If you're currently depressed or feeling victimized, just take comfort in knowing that there ARE people fighting the good fight and focus on making your own life better first.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 07:31 PM
1

I wouldn't go so far as claim that quotas are bad in principle. But they're just a feel-good failed counter measure for the real problem: too many black men are being sent to jail. Anyone trying to help "minorities" through any means that don't have as central focus the reduction of black men incarceration rates is either a fool or a hypocrite or both.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 03:13 PM
13

There are men's rights issues that are specific to poor white males. There are men's rights issues that are specific to black males. There are men's rights issues that are specific to fathers. There are men's rights issues that are specific to male students. There are men's rights issues that are specific to male employees. Etc.. etc.. If men's rights issues should only be discussed when speaking of issues that affect absolutely all males, I think you'll find that there isn't going to be much le…
/r/MensRights21/11/12 03:07 PM
26

I totally get it guys. See, remember that time on the view where they laughed at this guy who got his dick cut off. That wasn't misandry. That was misogyny. See, when a guy loses his penis he becomes more feminine. So if you laugh at a guy for having is dick chopped off you're basically implying that being feminine is worse than being male and that's sexist! What the girls did wrong is that they laughed at him. What they should have done is congratulate him.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 01:49 AM
8

https://acluva.org/ The current top article is about their FOIA request. The second one is about how they are pressuring the governor and the courts to expedite the release of a man falsely imprisoned because a 10 year old girl told a bunch of lies. So I wouldn't put the ACLU on the bad guys column just yet. I think that if there were at least some ACLU members in Virginia they should send them a message to explain their concern and ask for a clarification for why the ACLU thinks it is necessary…
/r/MensRights17/11/12 11:58 PM
2

Socially awkward office girl. SAP
/r/MensRights17/11/12 07:06 PM
0

If you now feel uncomfortable in your place of work, spruce up your resume and go find a job somewhere else.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 06:58 PM
3

I think 17 years for murder is legit (in terms of gender bias). If it sounds low, it's because sentencing guidelines keep getting worse for everything except murder and beating people up. It's like we're in some weird fucked up reality where the two most important things that the law is supposed to protect us from is being ignored in favor of special interests (feminists lobby and corporate lobbies)
/r/MensRights17/11/12 06:28 PM
2

I'd agree that this was extremely rapey. Assuming that the account is correct. This is a couple who, with premeditation got her excessively drunk with the intention to have sex with her. When you're that drunk, you can't object to much anymore, and the simplest of psychological tricks can make you almost enthusiastically agree to almost anything. So yes, this was rapey because: It was not her decision to get that drunk The couple got her that drunk with premeditation and intent to bypass her wil…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 03:12 AM
-2

Your honor, I object! Judge: Why? Because it's devastating to my case!
/r/MensRights09/11/12 07:00 PM
4

Completely ridiculous conjecture. Republicans have always been pretty open about their desires to curtail contraception and abortion and lately even rape apologists have surfaced without being categorically refuted by the party. And THAT is why women are voting against republicans in such great numbers and it has nothing to do with financial protection for single women.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 01:38 PM
17

Where's the report button? *Edit: Report/remove tag I picked hate speech as the reason.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 01:28 PM
3

Exactly, it's the whole white males can't be victims because 95% of billionaires are white males. But I would like to point out that she did (accidentally) bring up a good point about racism, and I'd like to specifically point out black males. They are getting incredibly hard hit by a double whammy of racism and anti-male prejudice. And most of whom also suffer from the condition known as being poor which brings in the triple whammy: Go straight to jail, do not pass go, do not collect $200.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 02:33 AM
1

In summary: #) MRA's say that men suffer from X more than women. But X in men is caused by A whereas X in women is caused by B. Therefore we don't care about X in men and only about X in women.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 02:23 AM
3

It labels women who want to use condoms so they can have lots of sex as sluts and it implies that there's something wrong with that. If a woman wants to spend her teens to her mid thirties having sex with alpha males it is entirely her right. This article attempts to vilify sluts. And even worse complains about the availability of tools that enable sluts to behave as they like. They link you posted seems to be advocating the legislation of morality. If the government should legislate any kind of…
/r/MensRights08/11/12 01:41 AM
-2

Lack of women in STEM fields is a problem. And I think the cause is exactly the same as fewer men in college. Hypoagency. Women do not consider themselves responsible for their own financial future. Men consider themselves responsible for their own financial future and to some extent that of their family/parents as well. What this means is that men will go into STEM fields if they think they can make it. Or they'll go straight on the job market if they think they can't. Women have no trouble goi…
/r/MensRights08/11/12 01:00 AM
-14

In fact I wouldn't be surprised if a good chunks of MRAs just want back to the "good old days" where women were more or less treated like property. Which is why MRA is not a viable long term solution. Just like feminism it is fundamentally biased against equality just based on the name itself.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 02:27 PM
1

"You'd have to change what you identify as around the clock" Yes you would. Kinda like if you don't want to be mistaken for a feminism hater then you shouldn't call yourself a Men's Rights Advocate. Because that's what the most prominent Men's Rights Advocate advocate. Yes, it's really inconvenient. But like the article says. Grow up. It's not fair, too bad. Pick another label and deal with it. If you continue to fly under the MRA label, then you'll be counted in the statistics as one of those p…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 02:24 PM
0

There's no date on this article, so it's worthless. Want to submit a worthwhile link? Use a site that actually bothers to date their articles.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 12:02 AM
0

Our actual goals (the most vocal of us at least) are fairness and equal rights. These are inclusive goals. Vocal feminist goals are female supremacy. Those are divisive goals. They are extremely good at putting an egalitarian spin on it. But it's not going to last for much longer. Soon enough they'll join the ranks of the racists and misogynists. And hopefully, thereby become irrelevant.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 09:15 PM
1

Exactly, I think this is a critical message that we need to make heard. Men's rights is not a conservative group. We're not trying to take away women's right to abortions. We're not trying to prevent gay marriage. All that we want is to be treated fairly. We want to roll back sexist laws targeted against men. We want protection for innocent men who can be falsely accused of rape (or much more frequently, threatened with false accusation of rapes). We want fair treatment under family law. We want…
/r/MensRights04/11/12 01:56 PM
-4

She is clearly extremely dishonest. There is no reason to believe her stories of abuse.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 07:09 PM
7

No it isn't fair. It's not fair to the parent that doesn't want the child to pay for something that the other parent unilaterally decided to have. It's not fair to the mother who may be forced to carry the pregnancy to term (which includes hormonal changes, energy changes, lifestyle changes etc...). And it is unrealistic as women who won't want to be saddled with the responsibility will just find a way to terminate the pregnancy anyway. The fairest outcome is that if both parent want the child t…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:33 PM
0

What's missing from this whole argument is the widespread knowledge of what the conclusion to all that is. The conclusion is: "We need to tell women to work harder, to fully take on their share of social responsibility because today they're not." The fact is that they pretty much do get equal pay for equal work. The problem is that they don't work enough. But somehow the result seem to be that we should make it easier for women to get high paying jobs and high responsibility positions. This is s…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 12:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter