TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Pvtmiller Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by Pvtmiller on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-5

The entire point of this sub basically just celebrating sexism, what do you expect?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/19 01:18 PM
1

It is already a crime. This is just pandering to the base.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/19 05:35 AM
2

Hate to be that guy, but mark NSFW for gore or something. I'm basically a wuss when it comes to that stuff.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 04:04 AM
-1

Because anything posted in the Sun is obviously true. Come on people, really?
/r/MensRights12/10/12 01:36 AM
1

Never.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 08:33 PM
1

But I already never shave, I get my beard trimmed when I get haircuts. How should I go about shaving even less for november?
/r/MensRights02/09/12 07:46 PM
3

Well, and all the potential complications.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 04:02 AM
3

Do they seriously think that "clitoral nicking" sounds better than FGM? Also, hey. At least they aren't hypocrites. They really just like cutting up babies' crotches.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 02:59 AM
20

What was the ratio of likes to comments? The picture tells me specifically to not comment if I think it's OK to cry, so no wonder all the comments said no.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 12:49 AM
3

Sorry, I guess I wrote that wrong. I meant that the function of the surgery itself is purely cosmetic and has no real reasons other than that, not that the foreskin itself is cosmetic
/r/MensRights02/08/12 11:49 PM
8

Condoms exist, and isn't it the choice of the child anyway if he wants to cut off a piece of his dick for a slightly lower STD rate anyway?
/r/MensRights02/08/12 07:26 AM
12

It boils down to "fuck your religion" because you refuse to accept the other points. An intact penis functions better than a cut one, and you just keep using "well mine seems fine" as an excuse for discounting that. This is silly, you just ignore my points except for the religious part and then slam me for my supposed intolerance when all I'm doing is not supporting a practice that kills hundreds of children a year and serves no purpose.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 06:23 AM
13

Actually I wasn't gonna pull out the FGM card, but you brought it up, so I'll say something about that. All FGM, even the type where they just prick the genitals with a needle, is banned. Yet circumcision, which removes a massive amount of nerves? perfectly fine. Also, the hygiene issue is bullshit. As an owner of a foreskin, it's fucking trivial to pull it back and wash it in the shower. I don't remember being somehow confused by a hunk of skin when I was a child and not washing there. And "The…
/r/MensRights02/08/12 05:47 AM
16

Fine, I'll make this case then. Why does he get to make permanent modifications to another person's body? Why does he get the right to take away this choice from the child?
/r/MensRights02/08/12 05:12 AM
16

answer this question for me. Why is it OK to make a permanent choice to remove a part of your child's body? why is it your choice to make? What right do you have to choose that this PERMANENT, PURELY COSMETIC surgery be performed on his body without any input from him? He should choose for himself how he wants his body to look when he is an adult.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 05:10 AM
17

Then why should you be able to chop off the foreskin? It's a bit on a baby's body, and you just told me that you shouldn't do that. Or should I just make an exception for you because your old book told you to?
/r/MensRights02/08/12 04:23 AM
23

So I can just go around chopping off bits of a baby's body and it's perfectly fine?
/r/MensRights02/08/12 04:11 AM
5

I assumed there was something like that, thanks for the clarification. So then we should stop being up in arms about this, it's silly to whine about stupid stuff like this when there are real things to complain about....
/r/MensRights28/07/12 10:08 AM
4

I refuse to believe this is the full law. Under that, not only can females not be convicted of rape, but a male using fingers or toys instead of his penis couldn't legally be convicted of rape. Even if UK was completely sexist on purpose with it's laws, that is a massive loophole.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 05:47 AM
0

So I put an extra just in there and it changed my meaning a little. You do realize how petty it is to use shit like that in an argument, and add no additional other arguments , right?
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:53 PM
0

The I'm moving to Denmark statement was in response to "People dont sue people in Denmark." Which, if you've ever even heard of America, you'll know that suing people for stupid shit is a disgustingly common occurrence, and someone from here might enjoy the idea of a place where that doesn't happen. He wasn't saying that he liked the idea of a place where he could rape people.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 06:37 PM
13

the /s tag doesn't make it funny.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:15 AM
5

Then debate. why is this not a religious issue at all?
/r/MensRights13/05/12 03:02 AM
4

Site is NSFW, so here is the text for people: Tokyo’s 79-year-old fuhrer Shintaro Ishihara’s latest rant against young people is to accuse of them of failing to have sex and produce more taxslaves due to worries about their small penises and propensity to premature ejaculation. Speaking at a government education panel, aside from the now traditional accusation that young people are suffering from “information overload” from too much TV and Internet, he also tried his hand at some sexology: “You …
/r/MensRights13/05/12 02:24 AM
8

Shut up, you know this is a religion issue as much as it it a men right's issue. In Europe they don't routinely chop off foreskins as a matter of course, only religious people do it.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 02:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter