TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Pwr-usr69 Archive

View 0 posts and 75 comments by Pwr-usr69 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I don't think there's any deliberate intent or effort being made to redirect this bias to being the fault of misogyny, but I do agree with the empathy gap being a much more obvious and likely explanation than, "oh it's a woman driver, better stay clear haha!".
/r/Male_Studies23/02/22 04:34 PM
3

Wrong sub.
/r/Male_Studies23/11/21 03:46 PM
3

Probably reacting to the part stating men receive more severe IPV than women, if they aren't just downvoting over the subject matter
/r/Male_Studies02/09/21 11:07 PM
1

I literally just think there's a lot of discussion that can be had about men's rights or improving the problems we face without invoking the worst of feminism. There's plenty to explore and consider and lots of constructive debate to be had. I mean, we are never going to run out of places discussing feminism negatively. Like ever. In fact that seems to be the norm when it comes to men's rights oriented spaces so far. Don't you think it would be worth having a place for men's rights where feminis…
/r/MensRights09/08/21 06:43 AM
1

Not even close to what i said, but you do you
/r/MensRights08/08/21 09:40 PM
-5

Maybe if just once we could have a men's rights group focused primarily on men's rights it would succeed and be accepted as a mainstream Reddit community. That'd be great. Then the message of supporting and promoting men's rights would actually get broader traction across Reddit. But instead we get constant bitching about feminism, complaints about women, generalisations and misogyny. It's beyond stupid. Imagine being aware of reddits lazer focus on anything resembling woman / feminism hate and …
/r/MensRights08/08/21 07:20 PM
2

I hear what you're saying, and it sounds very reasonable. Thanks for clarifying
/r/Male_Studies28/07/21 02:45 PM
2

I'm inclined to agree with a lot of what you've said here. Even if the existence of the phenomenon itself is reasonably accepted to some degree, the attempt to apply it universally as a one-size-fits-all explanation for the various cultural and social pressures on men to deny feminine attributes just feels too far reaching and flimsy for me. As an idea it's certainly worth exploring, and sure, the fact that envy among women and girls for male attributes is more freely accepted and expressed coul…
/r/Male_Studies28/07/21 10:40 AM
5

No link to the actual study? I know it was mentioned to be part of a dissertation but they didn't provide any direct links to the paper itself
/r/MensRights27/07/21 06:50 AM
-4

Can you elabirate on how you're treated badly here and why your race is relevant to that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/21 01:34 AM
1

The concept isn't that exactly, but i agree that that's how its applied by a lot of so called progressives. I really hate that every new idea with potential to be used for good is weaponised by shitty people
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/21 04:53 PM
1

I can relate. Hopefully you'll find it easier as you go. Dip your toes in and share a little of what's going on inside, start with trivial things if that helps. Just don't get discouraged by people like the commenter above. If you can recognize their lack of understanding and empathy for what it is, you can use that basis to dismiss it, so it doesn't have so much of an effect on you. Works for me anyway.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 12:32 AM
8

Sounds like you're irrationally insecure about showing your emotions and don't have genuine trust in your partner, there's no reason to be insecure about that, it only makes you look bad towards fake people who are insecure themselves. Insecurity about making yourself emotionally vulnerable is pretty normal on some level. More so among guys because we are socially conditioned not to be sympathetic towards men or view them as capable of the full range of emotions like women and children are.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 11:04 PM
1

I don't agree that the strength of child & father bonds just comes down to values they teach Values AND life lessons. If you still disagree, let's agree to disagree. Sure Where do you live where this is the case? Wasn't one of the main points of this discussion that men don't get fair custody treatment? If men can't be with their children, how can they teach them about life? Ah. I see your point. You just spoke pretty generally and i thought you were suggesting it was the majority of situations.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 09:15 PM
1

natural and sexual selection are "blind" That's the point of nature, it's not a conscious being. If I said this, you should see that what I mean is that some things are more beneficial and work better, at least according to nature. Sure. Agreed. But what works better is very relative to immediate environmental forces, and changes very often. It's a weird term, but not wrong. If your teacher said hi, would you say back "hey learning facilitator" or "hi miss"? The first one is objectively true, bu…
/r/MensRights30/04/21 09:03 AM
1

Yes, the labour should be divided like this: Men do work outside the house, and women work inside the house. If that suits you, sure. Nature intends nothing Well, yes, it does. I'm saying the processes of natural and sexual selection are "blind", in a sense. Not aiming towards a specific goal like conscious beings do. Things that work, tend to stay, but nature itself doesn't have an end goal or grand design in mind for humans or our social organisation. "as nature intended" implies that sort of …
/r/MensRights28/04/21 08:02 PM
1

Just making the point that working isn't the bulletproof excuse for laziness at home It truly is, if you're the sole breadwinner your wife should do all the work at home Division of labour. My parents both worked full time and split duties in the home between them. How you split things should depend on who works, how long, whether they work from home and a bunch of other variables. You could be the sole bread winner working one day a week, sitting around doing nothing while your partner does all…
/r/MensRights27/04/21 11:54 AM
1

All the men i know do both Okay Just making the point that working isn't the bulletproof excuse for laziness at home that lots of men seem to think it is. And that the two types of contribution aren't mutually exclusive. Also, not saying you do believe this, but it's a very weird and utilitarian view to have where men play no major role in the lives of their children other than contributing money. Not no role, but yes the main role of men as parents is to provide and protect You're phrasing this…
/r/MensRights27/04/21 08:07 AM
1

up saying men objectively have no child rearing skills so all they contribute is the money I said mostly, so as in most of the contribution is the money. I'm not saying men couldn't learn, but yeah most men still go out and work rather than do domestic tasks. All the men i know do both. They're not mutually exclusive and my sample is clearly different from yours. So I'd need an actual source if you're gonna say most men objectively have no child rearing skills. Also, not saying you do believe th…
/r/MensRights26/04/21 07:26 AM
1

What's this bold ass statement based on? That's the reason why judges give women custody, because they ignore the side of raising a child that involves making money. Unless you mean to imply that judges merely interpret the law based on whims, which they don't. I was referring to you straight up saying men objectively have no child rearing skills so all they contribute is the money. I wasn't sure you were being serious.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 10:15 PM
1

Think of a classic example of the man who has lots of kids by multiple women and has no interest in raising them. No, because once you choose to raise a child, you should have to, unless the parental rights for the child are taken away by court. So you're saying that after birth if you haven't decided to drop parental rights / responsibilities, you have to continue to raise them. What if you don't? What if you leave the household, avoid contact, and do your own thing elsewhere? The court takes a…
/r/MensRights23/04/21 05:46 PM
1

I get the my money my choice thing but if you're selfish it will be in direct conflict with what's best for the child in some cases Unless you have parental right (i.e. you are a proper guardian of the child) you should not have parental responsibility to do what is best for the child. Only two entities would have that responsibility in that case: the mother and the government. You know, thinking about it, i think I'm leaning further away from this line of reasoning now. Yeah parental responsibi…
/r/MensRights23/04/21 10:13 AM
1

It should be applied both ways You missed the point. Here, I'll give it to you with the genders reversed. If a woman doesn't have parental rights to a kid (yes unlikely, this is why child support affects men more), why should she have responsibility toward the kid? This is very close to what (I think) i said a comment or two earlier, about rights and responsibilities being linked. You shouldn't be able to have one without the other. Period. But yeah it sounds like a valid point. I watched a vide…
/r/MensRights20/04/21 08:49 AM
7

That's horrible. Thoroughly messed up
/r/MensRights18/04/21 06:58 PM
1

I think child support and alimony aren't fucked up as long as they are applied both ways They are fucked up. Her body her choice, but my money my choice? If a man doesn't have parental right to a kid, why should he have responsibility toward the kid? And if a woman can't raise that kid without money from the father, she doesn't deserve custody, she is an unfit parent, the father should get custody. This is what i mean. It should be applied both ways so that if he can't afford the kid without hel…
/r/MensRights18/04/21 09:19 AM
1

A general unfair bias, yes. That's... exactly what I'm saying. Studies Show Judicial Bias Against Dads (archive.is) Judges just assume the woman should get custody. That's how it is. If both parents are normal people, the woman usually gets full custody. And on top of that, the man has to pay child support. AND alimony. Both of which are fucked up things. You said it was automatic and every time, which is different enough from the above to be worth making the distinction. Definitely there is a b…
/r/MensRights15/04/21 06:53 PM
1

It's not like that happens every time. Yes it does, that's part of the legal process. In custody, it's assumed the woman will get custody, unless she's some kind of psycho or something. If the guy wants custody, he has to contest it. Yeah. I'm not convinced of this. A general unfair bias, yes. Much more than half the time, yes. A higher standard of conduct to meet for men, yes. A weak or non-existent defence against accusations for men, yes. Automatically and every time, no. I don't think so. We…
/r/MensRights15/04/21 07:28 AM
1

the body of the foetus. Only till 8 weeks, and then the foetus is a living human. Ok If the father is out of the picture sure, the opposite would be true also no? No, even if the father is in the picture. Also, they don't even have to inform the father that he is a father, lol. Good point. Very good point. That is something that we need to address as a society. Also, women can easily make a father not have any choice in adoption, if they divorce and the father gets no custody, for example. That'…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 07:53 PM
1

I don't understand the comment (aside it stupidly being aimed at men). Is there a specific context to this?
/r/MensRights13/04/21 07:01 PM
1

I'll just point out that I agree with this in essence, just as a matter of semantics I think men do legally No, we don't. We can't choose at any point for sure, whether we want to raise the child or not. Custody is often given automatically to women. Men can't opt out of child support ("financially abort") while a baby is still in the womb. Meanwhile, women can kill the baby before a certain amount of weeks. Ok well the abortion aspect just seems impossible to change. It's just a feature of biol…
/r/MensRights13/04/21 03:43 PM
1

Are a large amount of people I've encountered who call themselves feminists completely wrong? It may be so. Did most of those people not advocate for women's rights? They did. Some also advocated for men's rights too, openly saying that any form of feminism that doesn't also advocate for men is incomplete or not in favour of equality. They did however place men's rights on a lower priority scale than women's, due to the widely accepted perception that men already have all the rights they could n…
/r/MensRights11/04/21 10:48 AM
1

I don't decide who can and can't call themselves a feminist. They define themselves as feminists. No, but YOU'RE the one calling them feminists. Regardless of what they are, your logic is "since they are calling them feminists, I can call them feminists." Feminism isn't self defined. You ACTUALLY have to hold certain beliefs to be part of any ideology, really. This feels like quite a good point initially. You're deffo right about there having to be (at some basic level) a belief or agreement wit…
/r/MensRights10/04/21 07:46 AM
1

Ultimately it's unprovable. You can't prove feminists, the feminist movement, or people who identify as feminists Yes, but that's only because YOU define those people as feminists. By definition, some of those aren't feminists, and those that are feminists by definition, are not for equality, unless they are also MRAs, and most aren't. I don't decide who can and can't call themselves a feminist. They define themselves as feminists. That's how you know who is and isn't a feminist. That's how most…
/r/MensRights09/04/21 02:38 PM
1

also think that Google's definitions are (by definition) super condensed They are an Oxford Google collaboration. I said Cambridge, but I was wrong, the actual source is even more trustworthy. Fair enough. Sounds like a very credible source. Although the credibility of that wasn't really in question. For the sake of simplifying this whole thing I'll drop the part of my argument that rests on "most widely used definitions of feminism" because really, it's not fair. As I illustrated feminism has b…
/r/MensRights08/04/21 12:38 PM
1

No, simpleton, the definition is "the advocacy of women's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes." The reason is equality, not the aim. The aim is to increase women's rights, on the premise that women have less rights than men, which has simply never been true. Even in the 50s, many of the legal issues that face men today were still present. At no point was the situation that men had all the rights that women did while women did not have all the rights men did. Huh, looks like (as I s…
/r/MensRights08/04/21 12:29 AM
2

don't quite agree with your implication that anyone who aligns with or calls themselves a feminist is automatically unable to be for equality. No, the implication isn't that someone who "calls" themselves a feminists is unable to be for equality, but that by the definition of feminism, feminists can't be for equality. You've ignored my entire argument. Sorry, I wasn't trying to ignore your entire argument, I guess I side-stepped it a bit because It doesn't make sense to me. The definitions of fe…
/r/MensRights07/04/21 10:34 PM
2

Proof or cap. Also, one comment from me doesn't count as the sub's whole views. I've seen it frequently enough on here to recognize it as a problem, and last time I tried defending this sub on another I got linked to a few comments that I couldn't justify. I'm not going to search for them or start scrolling back weeks in my messages for it. I'm just not inclined to put a lot of time or effort into proving it to you. Look if you've never seen anything like I mentioned and genuinely have no idea w…
/r/MensRights07/04/21 06:34 PM
1

I don't give a fuck if I'm not your favourite guy This is not blind hate, it is justified criticism of a lopsided, morally bereft ideology. It's not binary absolutism, because some feminists are alright people, but sticking to the definition of feminism, feminism is wrong. Also, yes, I care about men's rights, although you clearly don't. You're angry, I get that. Don't think I don't often feel the same way when I hear some comments, certain twitter hashtags, or see misandry on Reddit. That very …
/r/MensRights07/04/21 09:16 AM
-5

1) your username doesn't add up. You're not my favourite guy. 2) look no further than this very comment for the sort of blind hate and binary absolutism that turns other people away from this sub. You're exactly the sort of person I was talking about. You don't actually care about men's rights, you care about attacking feminism and everyone else. You're just setting us all back mate.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 07:42 AM
4

And why do you think that is? Men are angry because men are constantly being insulted and derided in mainstream society. I know. I'm a man and I don't like that treatment any more than you do. The problem is allowing your emotions to affect what you write and remembering that it reflects the attitude of this place to more moderate / ignorant people who are encountering this sub for the first time. I encounter discussions about this place often and its always an upvoted comment saying how this an…
/r/MensRights06/04/21 09:37 PM
-10

Misogynistic posts are sometimes upvoted here and instead of critiquing the attacks on other people and places, most people here blindly upvote because they're emotionally driven and angry. That's different from enforcing moderation and clamping down on ragebait like any good moderation team is supposed to do. You'll see a lot of posts about it being a conspiracy or everyone being against us here but if you critically analyze the way people here speak about women, feminism, other subs, etc, you'…
/r/MensRights06/04/21 09:14 PM
0

I've never actually seen anti white posts on r/FragileWhiteRedditor
/r/MensRights06/04/21 09:09 PM
1

That's such a stupid thing to say man. Seeing your comment get upvotes is a real disappointment
/r/MensRights29/03/21 06:16 PM
2

In some cases yes. In others, no
/r/MensRights29/03/21 07:55 AM
4

Pretty much. I feel that people should realise that this is just not the way to achieve any sort of progress or common ground on issues like this. I visit subs like this as well as the more lefty subs that hate it for those very reasons, and no one there actually ever gets convinced of anything problematic in society by these sort of "points". Since I am working on my own flaws individually, I'm highly aware of the temptation to make passive aggressive arguments like this, but in doing so you: 1…
/r/MensRights29/03/21 07:08 AM
4

I feel like the people behind this campaign likely aren't men or have always lived in wealthy super safe areas with no real life understanding of crime or bad people.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 11:09 PM
3

It's not. That same comparison gets made in every debate and thread related to this. It won't make any impact other than to paint you as a racist in the eyes of the person you're making the point to.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 11:06 PM
6

Threads like that should be more common tbh
/r/MensRights28/03/21 11:00 PM
-36

Look I definitely hate when people trivialize and minimize the problems faced by another group., but this post isn't really that. The title clearly States that its focused specifically on issues men face that they aren't sympathetic towards, or don't care about. It deffo looks to me as though a lot of things that they believe are trivial or unimportant men's issues (like friend zoning or tinder failure) aren't really men's issues. They're just things they obviously hear lots of men complain abou…
/r/MensRights28/03/21 10:54 PM
12

A very good point. I think it's a good general rule to be as clear and precise with your words as possible, both to facilitate good understanding in discussions and to prevent words and phrases being used to contradict or undermine you. There's the added benefit of it helping us really articulate to ourselves what we are thinking and feeling without relying on lazy generalizations and broad characterizations. Something extremely common on Reddit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/21 11:16 PM
3

Don't gage time to fully read up on this right now, but if the summaries below are true then its an absolutely insane development.
/r/MensRights20/03/21 06:55 PM
8

I don't know if it happens a lot but however much it happens is too much. I think it varies a lot depending on region, and more traditional places are more likely to believe in that myth. Victim blaming is still a large problem in some places for women. It's a larger problem everywhere for men (who are often considered impossible to rape or sexually assault) Since society's (and this threads) focus is exclusively on women victims, I'd say victim blaming (for women) is already fairly low in mains…
/r/MensRights20/03/21 06:53 PM
2

I want this to be a place of genuine discussion and progress, not another outrage machine like so many others on Reddit
/r/MensRights19/03/21 10:51 PM
9

I feel like retweets by irrelevant nobodies aren't really mensrights material
/r/MensRights19/03/21 10:12 PM
12

After posting the sign, Do you think all the banks customers would be upset because the request went to all customers instead of just bank robbers? Do you think #NotAllCustomers would start trending? If it was directed specifically to a subset of customers like men, women, tall, short., etc, Maybe.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 10:10 PM
39

Yeah this has been a serious issue for some time, and as you're seeing it affects women victims too. Unfortunately wider society is insistent on applying a gendered lense to sexual mistreatment instead of just looking at it as a problem that affects everyone and can be committed by everyone. As a result the prevailing view is that men are perpetrators of sexual assault and women are victims. Unfortunately this means that women, like you, who are victimized by other women tend to be sidelined, or…
/r/MensRights19/03/21 10:09 PM
3

That's not far off what I learned at uni. Where'd you get those stats?
/r/MensRights19/03/21 08:56 PM
1

Stupid if true
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/21 06:01 PM
1

Is this real? Do the police really clap back on social media like this?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/21 04:23 PM
8

True. It's a serious problem that only serves to further push the sexual mistreatment of men and boys further into obscurity. It was a problem when I was at university a decade ago and is just as bad now, if not worse. At least more people are taking about it now though, so there's some small sense of progress.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 03:56 PM
0

Who cares? Allowing yourself to fall into the trap of comparing the sexes is going to lead you nowhere good. It's difficult to prove either way. We are taught historically that major events in history are determined by a few handfuls of great men which is a fallacy, ignoring that many waves and societal shifts are always the consequence of many, many people's decisions and behaviours. Even the handful of super influential people throughout the ages were themselves influenced, supported, directed…
/r/MensRights19/03/21 03:05 PM
20

Domestic violence is and always has been roughly equal between the sexes. Sexual assault is largely the same. Most studies funded to research this are just poorly designed. You're also right about disproportionate funds being allocated towards women's needs at the exclusion or expense of anything for men. A battered boyfriend or husband often has very few taxpayer funded options by comparison.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 02:53 PM
2

I'll be honest I came back to this whole thread again and I'm actually more inclined to agree with you now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/21 09:36 AM
11

Meh. Read the article, think I agreed with 50% of it. I also don't think it's hugely relevant to men's issues directly if I'm honest.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/21 12:48 AM
-6

For what it's worth I read the article and think it makes a worthwhile contribution to any of these subs, the friends of Sarah are better positioned than any posturing outsider to speak on what she would have wanted. Sounds like a good basis for discussion. I can't say anything about the mod situation because I don't know any of it, but I'd be wary of declaring your opposition to the entire movement of feminism (as an ideaology of equality), solely due to the ignorance and poor conduct of some s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/21 12:32 AM
40

Kind of a stupid move but this whole thing is stupid really
/r/MensRights15/03/21 04:07 PM
1

Ironically this could actually reduce street violence, unless the perpetrators start to shift their violence schedules to earlier in the day to match victim supply. We could totally make daytime more dangerous and nighttime safer!
/r/MensRights15/03/21 03:54 PM
-2

We were on the path of normalising women approaching men and crushing the ages old practice to men taking the first step. But now feminists are creating the narrative and spreading a fucked up thing saying all men are rapists and women should avoid them. I'm all for teaching the various dangers of being around immoral and dangerous people (of both genders), buy stuff like this is reactionary and pointless. If you're only saying this to passive aggressively counter extreme feminists and their bul…
/r/MensRights13/03/21 04:30 PM
1

I actually think I have a whole bunch saved from my university days I should start digging around for, I'm happy to see what you've got though!
/r/MensRights01/01/21 10:34 PM
77

Good. It should be on par with framing someone deliberately for a similarly serious crime.
/r/MensRights01/01/21 10:32 PM
6

It's good to see this being discussed and brought up as a topic worthy of being addressed.
/r/MensRights01/01/21 09:19 PM
353

That's a good thing to say as a protective parent, but unfortunately I don't think she realises how powerless she is to do anything if someone were to intentionally do that to her boys. It's in the hands of mainstream society at that point, which significantly leans in favour of accusers rather than defendants.
/r/MensRights01/01/21 09:18 PM
14

That's an excellent win! I hope this will be the start of it becoming more accepted and common to allow boys and male infants bodily autonomy and freedom of choice when it comes to their bodies.
/r/MensRights01/01/21 09:16 PM
3

That's very useful information. I remember studying this stuff and reading that the rates of domestic violence are roughly equal between the sexes across countries, although women are more likely to initiate violence (likely because of its acceptance within mainstream society). I wish this was common knowledge and that the mainstream media and digital media portrayals of domestic violence in the home were more accurate. The same ratio also applies to abuse of children in the home, interestingly.…
/r/MensRights01/01/21 09:14 PM
5

If i recall the rates of domestic violence is roughly equal between the sexes. Unfortunately that isn't common knowledge
/r/MensRights01/01/21 09:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter