TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Pyromed Archive

View 30 posts and 564 comments by Pyromed on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2443

Legal RightsPyromed/r/MensRights20/02/18 01:12 PM
1080

Marriage/ChildrenPyromed/r/MensRights23/07/18 08:56 PM
257

Activism/SupportPyromed/r/MensRights25/07/18 05:56 PM
134

GeneralPyromed/r/MensRights20/04/18 12:04 PM
132

Edu./Occu.Pyromed/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:11 PM
98

DiscriminationPyromed/r/MensRights19/12/17 10:18 PM
93

DiscriminationPyromed/r/MensRights08/01/19 11:18 AM
89

Activism/SupportPyromed/r/MensRights28/08/18 12:05 PM
79

Pyromed/r/MensRights24/06/18 12:38 PM
70

Social IssuesPyromed/r/MensRights01/03/19 04:05 PM
51

ProgressPyromed/r/MensRights05/09/18 05:46 AM
50

Legal RightsPyromed/r/MensRights11/05/16 03:32 AM
49

False AccusationPyromed/r/MensRights05/01/18 08:23 PM
42

False AccusationPyromed/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:02 PM
39

Social IssuesPyromed/r/MensRights07/03/18 12:47 PM
33

Activism/SupportPyromed/r/MensRights26/02/24 10:30 PM
31

Social IssuesPyromed/r/MensRights21/08/19 11:09 PM
28

GeneralPyromed/r/MensRights17/05/18 03:47 PM
26

Activism/SupportPyromed/r/MensRights04/08/19 01:51 PM
26

Pyromed/r/MensRights02/10/16 03:57 AM
22

FeminismPyromed/r/MensRights20/02/18 01:41 PM
21

Pyromed/r/MensRights16/04/19 08:38 PM
13

Pyromed/r/MensRights04/08/19 01:50 PM
11

False AccusationPyromed/r/MensRights18/12/17 09:52 PM
11

Social IssuesPyromed/r/MensRights10/03/18 01:51 AM
7

Social IssuesPyromed/r/MensRights29/01/18 11:13 AM
7

ProgressPyromed/r/MensRights18/07/18 11:55 AM
2

Pyromed/r/MensRights08/01/19 06:52 AM
1

Edu./Occu.Pyromed/r/MensRights07/04/18 12:25 PM
0

Social IssuesPyromed/r/MensRights12/04/18 10:45 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's hard to say really. So much of power is about attracting a partner, and at that point regardless of who is the one in the board room, there is likely input from the other party on matters at hand. "Behind every great man, is a great/er woman" combined with "happy wife happy life" types of mentality are all sayings that shed light on how power isn't as simple as so many make society out to be. I would say a few men have an edge but realistically it's meaningless because that self selecting p…
/r/MensRights09/05/26 11:53 AM
2

Nothing wrong with being like IQ except when you have an idea you want everyone to follow or believe.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 08:41 AM
22

The fact they claim Andrew Tate is an MRA at all shows how retarded they all are.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 12:53 PM
26

They see sexualisation as equivalent to objectification as in they think we see women as literal hunks of meat. Just speaking from personal experience I know that not to be true, completely ridiculous and frankly dehumanising. That's before you come onto the double standard that is clearly displayed from women and the sexualisation of men. I always find it interesting how feminists will say men's desire to have sex dolls "proves" that men just want sex objects when honestly to me it implies the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/25 06:25 PM
4

I have always said that contrary to feminist ideology, most transphobia and basically all TERF transphobia is rooted in misandry and not misogyny
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/24 12:20 PM
13

Traitors is not the word I think of. I generally think they are telling on themselves. They are projecting.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 06:30 PM
5

Do you believe if yours views on men’s rights were achieved, women and men would be happier? I think so, if life were more equal people would be better off and generally more happy with parity. It's obviously more complex than that as some things might not make you happy but you might be able to appreciate the fairness of a situation. Do you believe in feminism, and do you understand the different “types” of feminism? No. I think feminism makes some core assumptions that are either unequal in so…
/r/MensRights13/10/24 10:15 AM
0

To add to many similar thoughts here. There are plenty of examples in life where someone will say something is a deal breaker because someone didn't quite live up to their expectations, only to go and date someone with not only the same failings but a complete disregard for the entire principle of the topic. A basic example like not dating mature student for not being stable enough in a career but instead choosing someone with no formal training and an unstable employment track record, eg busker…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 10:57 PM
1

No you need to be a UK citizen. Appreciate the thought though.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 07:56 AM
3

I think what's the point, I get the continued set backs but what's the point of this subreddit if it isn't campaigning for actual change. I hate how this subreddit has become a swamp of "this girl was mean to a man" type posts.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 11:02 PM
6

I wonder with this conversation if evolutionarily intelligence plays less of a role since experience is generally more valuable than raw intelligence. The old adage of "book smart Vs street smart" implying that experience in itself is as if not more valuable. Humans are most fertile and sexually active when they're younger (Late teens to mid 20s) and generally lack a lot of life experience. So physicality is always going to play a bigger role as it is a better indicator that you will be healthy …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 11:15 PM
5

It's not that women don't care, or even that feminists don't care, but that only men are capable of fixing the problem I'm not saying that men don't play the biggest role in reducing violence all round but to say that women or feminists aren't capable of contributing to a solution is ridiculous. I don't think women understand the social power they have to influence men. Not only by rewarding peaceful behaviour but also by not inciting men to be violent on their behalf. The vast majority of the w…
/r/MensRights17/12/23 11:28 AM

Not defending op in the slightest but I wonder if it's just a good excuse to accuse things they're already insecure about or like many accusations of cheating, projection.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 10:59 AM

Not OC but agree with the jist of the original comment. So to answer your question, with regards to holistic medicine, absolutely, I feel the same way. At best it's a scam and waste of money while you get over a cold. At it's worse it's pure evil as it actively encourages people's suffering, often delaying or denying actual care. Blaming those victims when they don't get better for "not truly believing". Both astrology and "alternative medicine" make falsifiable claims that are regularly falsifi…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 10:41 AM
8

I think it's pointing out how small a minority it is rather than if it were say a 49/51 split. It is significantly a minority as opposed to a marginal minority. I think it's a hold over of academic language.
/r/MensRights27/11/23 06:28 PM
10

I've definitely heard men being referred to as "a man whore" negatively, as in he won't commit and hurts women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/23 06:55 PM
5

From personal experience I would disagree. You're wrong. You've been told multiple times how men have personally felt villainized. Go away you aren't adding to the discussion
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/23 09:16 PM
3

Absolutely. I see KalitheCat is still going strong. She was heavily active and clearly has only gotten more vile. I barely go on Reddit anymore and seeing how active it makes feel a little sad for her and how much of her life she's wasted. Hell I wasted too much time here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/23 10:39 PM
0

Niceness is the bare minimum level of respect all people deserve While yes it is what people deserve, reality shows time and time again that being nice was never and has never actually been a criteria for being selected. Often it's off putting as it comes off meek. Men are however told at length to be nice and that's what's important and are rightfully hurt when they find out they've been lied to.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/23 09:05 PM
2

If you don't see the point of discussion. Why are you here?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 05:13 PM
2

If you can't creatively solve problems, then your problems will never get solved. People are more than willing to give advice. So I don't see why they shouldn't be solved. People mainly just give advice that works for non-autistic people and forget to tailor it, or make coded suggestions which is the least helpful thing for someone who is autistic. You wouldn't give the same advice on how to get upstairs to someone in a wheelchair as someone with working legs. It's not so much as a special rule …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 05:12 PM
7

They refuse to use creative thinking to solve problems. They refuse? Or their disability prevents this? This is the problem that people think it's a choice and treat them as evil because they're applying agency that men are often given where a woman might be given pity or the benefit of the doubt. They want the answers to just be given to them. That's not how life works That's how it often works with female oriented issues. Fat acceptance being just one of many perfect examples. "It's not that t…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 04:43 PM
-19

He didn't ask her to delete anything, There does seem to be evidence that he did. It doesn't look like he was perfect but he did end it after all so it's a big non-story.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 02:11 PM
-20

This has literally nothing to do with Men's rights. This belongs somewhere else.
/r/MensRights23/05/23 11:02 PM
17

"Stabbed with knife" aka attempted to murder. Nowhere in the article does it even acknowledge that.
/r/PussyPass26/04/23 12:09 PM
0

Most people are actually biologically prone to monogamy. Any quick look at humans and their biological behaviour pretty much disagrees with this. Most people are monogamous because it's the societally acceptable thing, not because their biology tells them to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 01:21 AM
4

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-45277554 Basically an article on a man who was let down by authorities and ended up being murdered. Nobody took notice before it was too late.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 12:58 PM
16

If you shame the other side for complaining about a problem then you can claim you're the only one who ever suffers.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 02:49 PM
1

The guy who said being against slut shaming is bigotry against men, the pronouncements of what feminism “preaches”. Feminism is not synonymous with women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/21 03:10 PM
4

The only answer you'll get is "No, they're the oppressed group."
/r/MensRights11/10/21 11:09 AM
1

Or just post to Imgur or something with your details blanked please
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/20 10:39 PM
2

Two wonderful men took their own time out of their annual leave to come in and teach us medicine in the lead up to our exams. My father is a great role model, kind, generous and patient who always. PS: While I was writing this I literally found out one of men teaching me today came in on his birthday. What a dude.
/r/MensRights19/11/20 09:50 PM
39

"Look at all these men who got away with it right up until they didn't" The nerve of them is astounding.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen15/11/20 09:48 PM
1

Honestly sounds like projection
/r/PussyPass14/11/20 07:57 PM
1

They generalise but I’d disagree. Also... two wrongs and all that.
/r/PussyPass07/11/20 09:34 AM
0

🤣😂🤣😂😅😅😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😅
/r/PussyPass06/11/20 11:53 PM
1

Dude. It’s been long known that this post is based on Russian propaganda. If you didn’t know that I suggest you sit the fuck down.
/r/PussyPass04/11/20 07:41 AM
0

Given half the people here can’t tell the post is based on fake propaganda can you blame me?
/r/PussyPass04/11/20 07:36 AM
0

Then you forgot this /s
/r/PussyPass04/11/20 07:33 AM
0

If you don’t know that Mra stands for men’s rights activist is this context then you’re probably on the sub for the wrong reasons.
/r/PussyPass04/11/20 07:16 AM
0

No, I in fact rarely if ever side with feminists. But the video isn’t about feminists. It’s Russian propaganda.
/r/PussyPass04/11/20 07:14 AM
1

In what conceivable way could you possibly come to that conclusion.
/r/PussyPass04/11/20 07:13 AM
1

Feminists are people whether you disagree with them or not. Dehumanising people is Nazi shit. It is also relevant if you're using staged fake propoganda to fuel your disagreement with feminism. This is coming from a long time MRA
/r/PussyPass03/11/20 12:59 PM
0

You misspelled propoganda. That's always been alive and well there.
/r/PussyPass03/11/20 12:55 PM
-5

This is staged Russian shit.
/r/PussyPass03/11/20 12:53 PM
8

because prosecuting a potential liar might hurt real victims by making them afraid to come forward. Has there ever been any evidence of this? If anything the fact that we don't prosecute is what drives the underlying fear of false accusations. Everyone knows they aren't taken seriously. Everyone knows they'll get off so no noone knows whether the next accusation can be trusted. At least seeing some consequences for provenly false accusations would help mitigate that fear. Not to mention that usu…
/r/MensRights30/10/20 01:58 PM
1

Really? Got a link to the articles?
/r/MensRights26/08/20 04:42 PM
6

While technically true the difference is tiny because the incidence is so low and numbers too few to actually be significant. For all purposes it's about equal.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 03:01 PM
2

Look closely and you'll also realise they're racist and sexist but don't worry. It's ok when they do it /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/20 12:49 AM
9

I've been saying this forever. A large portion of the fear of trans people us just their unsheathed fear of men. Start treating men like human beings and not emotionless robot sex and death machines and almost all their problems go away over night.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/20 12:44 AM
23

FSW? You mean feminism starts, right?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen27/04/20 12:39 AM
4

I think this is where much of the problem comes from is very much chicken and the egg. Men feel required to work because of the expectation that women want to be cared for and do the caring and women feel trapped as mothers because men are expected to work. The real kicker is that in some relationships that works. In others only one half gets what they want and in the worst case noone does. So 3/4 of the time someone is miserable. Finding the solution isn't easy and requires honest conversations…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/20 11:22 PM
5

Not a men's rights issue
/r/MensRights02/04/20 10:52 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/comments/eq8g88/all_men_are_cheaters/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share The language is slightly different but the sentiment is there. This is something you can disagree with me here but I think people get hung up on the harsh language men use. It's like any other jargon or code. I'll agree with you trp is worse than either of the other two. MGTOW I'm still yet to be convinced about.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/20 08:32 PM
1

Eh. Maybe I'm giving them too much benefit of the doubt but it's jumping it at me any more than FDS. And that's comparing top all time posts. MGTOW aren't posting anything relevant atm for obvious reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/20 08:12 PM
1

I think that's an overly rose tinted view of FDS and a very bias view against the other two. But this difference of opinion is why I think they should all stay up unhindered. Because all of us see what we want to, skip over the bits we don't and that includes the vast amount of normal that just isn't controversial or offends our sensibilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/20 07:59 PM
2

There was one about how women aren’t capable of love so try and find that one. Now I've definitely seen that sentiment on FDS in relation to men. Again my point wasn't that I agree with either of them. My point was if FDS is allowed to exist TRP and MGTOW are no worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/20 07:53 PM
3

Could you give me a pointer? There's a million different links in the sidebar and I'm on mobile. Who's Rollo? Is his blog on the subreddit? You're obviously more familiar with this than me.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/20 07:47 PM
3

I think you'd be hard pressed to say the others do too. But then you'd have to get into the whole definition of value thing. I've definitely seen sentiments in FDS that men are only worth what they can give you. Which is pretty synonymous with saying most men are inferior.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/20 07:40 PM
2

I no you weren't asking me but I firmly hate FDS. I'm not a fan of red pill or MGTOW either. What I would like to see is some consistency. If FDS is ok theredpill and MGTOW are no worse. If I'm hugely wrong I'm open to it but I'd like to see examples. I don't really follow any of them, so the few posts I've perused in the past might not be representative.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/20 07:37 PM
15

Give men value outside of just being seen as useful to others.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 10:09 PM
4

Wow I don't usually go in for incel terminology but damn if that isn't some suicide fuel if that happened to you. Especially since it's a paid site.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/20 04:29 PM
10

How quickly did you get banned for this comment?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen05/01/20 12:18 PM
19

I'm guessing it's because you need to expand yours past "Oh, Honey".
/r/FeminismStopsWhen02/01/20 02:58 PM
15

I can't exactly debate you on facts as this is very much down to preference. It depends if you care more about figure than you do face. I for instance care more about a person's face. You could be a bit doughy but as long as you can give me a cute smile I'm really not that fussed. It depends on who you talk to but most people I know have agreed with me. It doesn't mean I'm right, just my observation.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/20 02:39 PM
4

I think it depends on a lot. Socioeconomic background for instance. I for instance grew up exceedingly middle class and identify with your version of things. Girls definitely were a huge determining and influencing factor on how guys acted. I'm ashamed to say my childhood homophobia only ever stemmed from wanting to be seen as attractive to girls, being seen as gay would be a detriment to that or so I thought. Despite being in a house with both parents and two brothers my mother was always the m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/19 04:41 PM
2

A good place to start is find an article that makes a claim and then read the research that should be linked.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 08:17 PM
3

Agreed. And in before "tone policing" accusations start getting thrown about. This sub has gone majorly down hill.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 02:01 AM
1

Its also easy to ignore WHY those women killed those men- because quite often domestic violence against women is not taken seriously Let's just victim blame why don't we. Let's also ignore the men who face coercive and financial abuse or parental alienation who aren't afforded the same sympathy. Let's ignore the very example I gave that could literally not have been the result of any of those. I don't think this means they deserve more abuse. Noone here did. Experience comes with age- which is w…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/19 11:03 PM
3

maybe if I was married to someone for ten years /had kids, they got a drink problem and became abusive I would feel different. Again, drinking problems don't happen overnight, nor are they without cause. If you as a partner fail to spot your significant other developing a problem and fail to talk to them or intervene, you're a shitty partner. However most women are groomed to endure bullshit from men and feel too much sympathy for their self induced problems. And men aren't told to man up and tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/19 10:30 PM
11

Stable healthy people know how to get out of one of those relationships before they go overly toxic. Abusive relationships don't happen overnight. Clearly if men outnumber women for being pedo's, rapists, murderers, abusers Juries out on all of these other than murdering although there is likely proxy violence being undercounted. Women are a bigger proportion of sexual abusers than society gives credit for. It's just not seen as abuse. but they experienced far more rude obnoxious twats that want…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/19 09:39 PM
1

Not an attack. Just an observation.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 05:56 PM
2

Where was my attack?
/r/MensRights17/12/19 05:56 PM
1

Dude fucking chill out. It wasn't an attack, it's an assumption, it's very possible that it's wrong. It's also not a value judgement. If I'm right it doesn't make it ok, bit it's not wrong just because you don't like it. Because Stockholm syndrome is a legitimate condition So is not realizing you're a victim. Just because it doesn't have a fancy name doesn't make it not a thing.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 05:34 PM
4

I am sticking up for the man when you have commented on his appearance and not made a contribution. That is the case of someone who doesn't have a proper argument Yeah that wasn't my argument. Nor was I labeling one. I was saying don't turn into one. I'm allowed to have my theories and they aren't invalid because of some anti critical shut down such as "victim blaming"
/r/MensRights17/12/19 05:28 PM
12

You don't sound like you need therapy tbh. Just a break. You sound like you're doing a great job though, and that's all can be asked. I'm sorry this happened, it's absolutely ridiculous.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 04:32 PM
8

How is it any more dismissive that saying he has Stockholm syndrome? It's a different explanation that doesn't fall into what Stockholm syndrome implies. People need to be able to talk about causes of things without being labelled evil, My comment wasn't a value judgment, you're trying to imply it was. Don't turn into an SJW.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 04:30 PM
7

No. Just making a guess as to his behaviour. Doesn't make him any less of a victim. I didn't mean it in a dismissive way.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 04:25 PM
7

In a way. Guy looks like the type that wouldn't even think it's possible to be a victim.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 04:13 PM
5

Absolutely. I recently just had a short relationship where a girl and I were almost perfect for eachother. Similar careers, well traveled, same humour, good sex. She mentioned she occasionally suffered fro OCD and anxiety. No Biggie I thought. I had just completed a string of therapy sessions to treat my OCD and intrusive thoughts, so I let her know. I'm like 98% of the way to feeling completely back on top but that didn't matter. She immediately went "off" and then twisted any behaviour of mine…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/19 02:23 PM
8

Want to bring up actual legal rights that's men need to fight for?... Crickets Want to talk about the way women enforce negative gender expectations?... [Banned] Want to talk about how you used to hate women and secretly want to rape them but now you've seen the light and want to be an ally?... 10k Want to talk about how you're LGBT and how people are mean about it sometimes? ...68k Now that's not to say that LGBT men don't face issues or that they shouldn't be addressed. It's just that that sub…
/r/MensRights22/11/19 07:47 AM
2

Acknowledging and caring about an issue doesn't mean you have to choose the nuclear fix. You can acknowledge that something is bad and needs to change but not agree with the solution. Is that not obvious?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 11:25 PM
1

Giving it the benefit of the doubt, I see it simply as a matter that everyday people are more likely to have influence over. I'd love for all of those issues to be taken care of as well, but my opinion and even my actions mean pretty much fuck all given the way government (doesn't) works. It will take moving mountains worth of effort to change those things. Dating dynamics however, I have influence over. I can consciously decide who and how I date. Bringing awareness to other parties that they c…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 11:13 PM
2

It doesn't even have to be a majority. Just a large minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 07:30 PM
3

Lol from who exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 07:26 PM
2

i.e. stop being hypergamous. It's bad for society where women and men are treat equally and have to compete for the same jobs but then refuse to date those below their financial bracket. For as long as civilization has existed up to this point women's lives were singlehandedly launched by men upon a marriage at a young age. Now in an era of equality that dynamic will naturally have to balance out along with everything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 07:21 PM
2

Maybe but there's a difference between positive virtue signalling which while possible patronising is better than the "I'm better and denounce this other group of people" type of virtue signalling which has become the staple of outrage culture. It's the opposite of understanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/19 07:13 PM
0

You're forgetting that they don't have to worry about a full time job in that situation. Worry about being the main provider and the responsibilities or stress that comes with that. That's why it's called a division of labour.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 03:40 PM
3

That's not what I usually see as what is claimed as "emotional labor". What you're describing is just a shitty relationship. It happens to both sexes. What I usually see is in terms of the pay gap and a response to men working 50-60 hour weeks, with a partner who does less paid work. But then feminists who want to claim they're actually doing the "same" amount of work or that they're doing more often claim women have to do all the "emotional labor". Which true or not in that set up makes more se…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/19 03:00 PM
2

What you mean is they were receiving copious amounts of death threats from violent male misogynists /s
/r/MensRights08/11/19 02:30 PM
10

It's very telling that it's the only video of the channel to have comments disabled.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 04:17 AM
5

I honestly don't hear this from feminists. What I do hear is "Men rape more, so it's justified when there are zero services catering to men, or that the services excluding men are justified"
/r/MensRights16/10/19 12:26 PM

I'm only an occasional visitor (although I like this place more than anywhere else) but I would echo others thoughts. We've likely seen most MRA memes of both the anti-feminist kind and "this is what make privilege" looks like. While they're easy to up vote and I don't have anything against it, I don't think it adds anything to the sub. There are plenty of other subs where you can get your fill of that content. If it's truly exceptionally different, the odd one won't hurt but I like the discussi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/10/19 09:23 AM
24

Don't forget MRAs are far less ban happy than feminist communities. If you don't share a mods political view you're in for a banning in feminist spaces.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 11:18 AM
1

I haven't been on this sub a whole lot recently. Do you think it's left wing sjw trolls or right wing incel types?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 08:01 AM
3

Oh certainly. I think pushing for paternity leave is essential.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/19 12:27 PM
6

Off the top of my head, I would suggest something similar to feminisms "Feminism helps men too" obviously any benefit that actually occurs is nebulous and as a bi product, but you need to sell the benefit of helping men to everyone. For instance the only time I've seen financial abortion brought up positively outside the MRM was in relation to a mother having to fight a manipulative partner for custody. Men also need to be humanised, although this is a more tricky one since many people's gut rea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/19 08:30 AM
15

2) Women do in fact make the first move. I've seen it happen a lot. It just doesnt happen to you. But that doesnt mean it doesnt happen. I'm not saying this never happens. It has happened to me a couple of times. That being said it doesn't negate the most common trend of men have to approach and women wait to be approached. It's definitely not even close to 50/50. As for 1 i agree creeps exist and its not simply all about women not approaching men. There are possibly other factors at play such a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/19 03:18 PM
1

This is less as a TRP POV but an MRA POV. If you're worried about being nice rather than being right, getting things done and changing laws it doesn't matter if at first I make you uncomfortable. All new and unfamiliar ideas are uncomfortable, seem foreign and possibly hostile. Isn't there the quote of "when you're the ones in power equality feels like oppression"? If I had to sit there and worry over every little word for fear of offending someone. If you're more offended by my language than th…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/19 05:32 PM
1

In the UK they don't really have time to teach politics, religion and social things (including health and sex education) so they squash it into one class that nobody cares about or respects usually taught by some last that's a million years old.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 07:49 AM
0

No offence but how can you be part of the men's right sub Reddit and not know that there's international men's day.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 07:45 AM
5

It's a very common argument feminists use when they're over generalising and someone (rightfully) claims "not all men"
/r/MensRights21/05/19 12:25 PM
1

I wasn't trying to imply all feminists or all women You don't need to defend against this. Feminists know when they say #YesAllMenAreLikeThat that they don't mean the men that aren't like that. If it doesn't apply to them, you obviously aren't talking about them. They should know this.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 09:25 AM
13

They should both be charged with manslaughter. Maybe even murder.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 02:40 PM
9

r/shittypickuplines
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/19 08:24 AM
8

I see you're a woman who knows how to make a cat go "Woof"
/r/MensRights08/05/19 11:51 PM
43

Men - "we just want to be treated like equals when we buy food and coffee" Her - "OMG I don't want to fuck you, get over it"
/r/MensRights25/04/19 02:21 PM
9

That's some fairly Kafka-esque logic you got there. Implying MRAs don't care about the concerns of gay men but then claim they're only doing it to virtue signal or as some political tool when we do. Which is it? I'm fairly sure I've seen an almost identical post to this before.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 03:06 PM
5

Oh absolutely. I'm not disagreeing with you or her there. I'm just pointing out the leniency of the media on comments that appear to be far more controversial in tone than Damores more cautious "men and women have different interests" approach.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 03:53 AM
8

"The posts were written by a female Microsoft program manager. Quartz reached out to her directly for comment, and isn’t making her name public at this point, pending her response." How very noble of them. If only they'd given James Damore the same courtesy. IMO what she said is actually far more controversial that what Damore actually said.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 03:44 AM
1

Is it really that hard to treat others with dignity? It's a pretty low fucking bar.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 04:51 PM
1

I agree with the first part but which part of the "manosphere" would you say degrades sluts? The problem with it being such a broad term specifically designed to invoke guilt by association it makes it difficult to actually infer any useful information from what you said.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 02:53 PM
1

My bad. I didn't think that looked right but I'm at work and using predictive swipe.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 02:14 PM
3

DID YOU JUST TELL ME TO SMILE???!???!?!!! HARASSMENT!!!!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 01:24 PM
14

That's cool and all. But when asked on a date don't say yes, arrange 2 out 3 of time, place, activity. Only to feign being too busy and never rearrange (edit): preceding being ghosted. Either straight up reject me or rearrange a time convenient for you. I can't read your mind to be able to suggest the specific night of the week you're both free and in the mood. If I'm expected to act respectfully, which is just common curtsy courtesy, make the first move and then accept rejection gracefully, I e…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 01:18 PM
2

While OP definitely has a shitty attitude I do think it's our responsibility as MRAs to look out for other men, gay, straight out whatever. That's why we exist.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 02:18 PM
2

This might be your truth but it's not the truth
/r/MensRights04/04/19 02:14 PM
1

Here's hoping it's not brigaded into no platforming
/r/MensRights04/04/19 01:56 PM
22

Imagine being more annoyed by someone pointing out the lack of equality that the equality itself.
/r/PussyPass25/03/19 03:57 PM
17

I genuinely can't tell. Is this real or not?
/r/MensRights22/03/19 03:06 PM
8

Just remember these are rare events. The point is not to scare you off women. Feminism has tried the opposite and it's just not a healthy mindset. The point is to show that everyone is capable of henous acts and justice should be equally dolled out.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 03:42 PM
2

Likewise, the 46% of men who now say people in the workplace aren't sensitive enough to sexual harassment is down, by eight percentage points. I think this says a lot honestly and not in a bad way. I think all the support has boosted companies propensity to take problems seriously which was surely the point of metoo despite its failings. Acknowledging that shouldn't be seen as a bad thing. In a perfect world we'd want that number to be zero to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/19 09:18 PM
3

Majorities of Americans overall still agree that sexual harassment in the workplace is a major problem (62%) and that people in the workplace are not sensitive enough to it (54%), but fewer do so now than in October 2017. Since then, hundreds of high-profile men in the U.S. have been accused of sexual misconduct. Currently, 53% of men say sexual harassment in the workplace is a major problem, down from 66% in 2017. Likewise, the 46% of men who now say people in the workplace aren't sensitive eno…
/r/MensRights19/03/19 02:00 PM
3

I wonder if this is linked with work place injuries?
/r/MensRights13/03/19 04:56 PM
2

Did the teacher not even take notice?
/r/MensRights11/03/19 11:22 PM
1

Just use a safety razor. It cuts down on razor rash and I'm still going through the 100 blades I bought for £7 3 years ago.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 07:41 AM
2

I'm glad this is starting to be acknowledged. The number of friends I've had to point out that it wasn't ok that their girlfriends put trackers on their phone is depressing.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 07:21 AM
8

When the headline and vast majority of the article substitutes boy with "child/ren" I would hypothesise it's a conscious effort to down play a narrative shifting piece of news. Any other headline would make it front and center that women were affected if it were women. Just go look at any me too article. In terms of search engine optimization this will have an impact.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 06:51 PM
4

I stand corrected. Although I still hold a concern that it's often little more than lip service. It's a shame it's not a more outspoken mainstream idea. In many ways it does seem that it is the majority opinion but people don't speak out in real life for dear if being land anti Semitic. It's interesting how people feel fine calling people who circumcise girls barbarians but start to squirm when you bring up boys. Obviously there is a historical context but it ignores the fact that often when fem…
/r/MensRights27/02/19 01:52 PM
2

Be a role model to others?
/r/MensRights27/02/19 11:38 AM
33

Are they doing anything about it? Personally I've only heard girls say they prefer it. Never the opposite or even think about it being a bodily autonomy issue.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 10:36 AM
4

Did you really just advocate for the murder of men in a men's rights sub? Get fucked.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 07:35 AM
4

WhAt DiD yOu Do To DeSeRvE iT?
/r/MensRights22/02/19 05:44 PM
3

Tried? You mean still are.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 10:53 PM
21

Women are far more likely to use weapons or psychological abuse. Both your story and this story show that. Simply dismissing women because they're smaller does nothing but minimise male victims. The BBC just released a harrowing documentary on such a case. The woman is very slight and tiny while he was originally fit and athletic. While he falls into the minority of cases where it's unidirectional violence it shows that it's more complex than simply looking at physical strength. Men are 3X as li…
/r/PussyPass19/02/19 02:04 AM
57

They both had a history of being abusive. So it's plausible. The biggest issue is everyone focuses on him being a shit bag but forgives and even applauds her. The problem is the current cultural paradigm regarding domestic violence which ignores that most domestic violence stems from a mutual inability to cope with stress or conflict leading to a cycle of violence. One person is the victim and then the other. Society, thanks in a large part, to the sexist Duluth model only categorises male viole…
/r/PussyPass18/02/19 11:32 PM
3

Slaves weren't required to be physically attached to their owners. That didn't mean they were free. Both are bad. Both should be avoided. Women also make up half if not more than half of the voting population. They will generally choose who supports them. Be it man or woman. Do you really want the government to be made up of women if they were all Sarah Palins?
/r/MensRights18/02/19 03:36 PM
1

Not every issue. Many issues precede feminism. That's not to say that feminism hasn't stood in the way in many places but without it many others would still be standing in the way, for such things like circumcision and parental custody rights. For instance "dead beat dad's" isn't exactly a feminist mantra. It's simply the mantra of women who expect men to be providers. I was simply taking about this post. This post of a screen cap of simply a bloody iMessage complaining about Reddit. I'm skeptic…
/r/MensRights18/02/19 01:37 PM
8

Well you can go to any non-related sub and find crazy people. But specifically to your last point men legislating that women (but not men) should be forced to donate their actual bodies to others for direct life support in lieu of machines, etc. Reddit fora are largely public, didjaknow? Women make laws too. Men's body are controlled by legislation. If not by selective service and the draft then by enforced child support. Enslaving them to someone else for 18 years with no say in the matter. Tha…
/r/MensRights18/02/19 04:54 AM
1

Maybe. But this is /r/feminism we're talking about here though. They ban other feminists. If this was a national body I'd feel more strongly.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 01:59 PM
64

Was the father involved as well? He's just as culpable.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 01:23 PM
1

Isn't there a new sub specifically for these kinds of posts? This isn't really about men's rights.
/r/MensRights17/02/19 06:11 AM
10

This happened in the UK?? Tasers are classed as a firearm in the UK (stupid I know) and if that were the case she'd be looking at a lot of time just for having the taser. Edit: Jesus I'm surprised she didn't get 16 months just for having the taser. What a disgusting human.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 06:46 PM
1

Most poor reporting from the BBC I see is generally through omissions of facts than straight up reframing. They aren't that stupid. The one that springs to mind is the reporting of a Scottish man who had good his testicle bitten off and was awarded a depressingly low compensation to be paid in installments. It was a joke. The BBC wrote a short paragraph that barely outlined what had happened.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 04:14 PM
2

Well considering that it doesn't ever seemed to have actually been a thing we're not legislating anything to begin with. So there's no logical reason that an imaginary weight would be used over an imaginary thickness. We're also talking about a period in time where weights and measures were probably not as widely available. So the easiest go to is just use something everyone has. Except a few unlucky or careless, or in the case of Norfolk or South Carolina, they have several.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 09:10 AM
1

No but that doesn't mean we should point out the bullshit when see it. Bringing attention to double standards and shitty behaviour is like 90% of being an MRA
/r/MensRights03/02/19 08:35 AM
2

I'd agree with you on everything except the last point. Using a thicker stick means more mass and momentum. Thin fast whippy sticks will sting like fuck and possibly even break the skin but they're unlikely to cause any internal blunt trauma unlike a large stick. Thin sticks more likely to bend and bounce reducing energy transfer making it over more safe.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 08:31 AM
3

Really? Jeez they make it so easy.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 08:36 PM
2

It's bumble. She has to contact him first. That's how the app works.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 08:34 PM
3

Or is it toxic femininity to expect to be paid for? The issue main issue is that Toxic Masculinity is only ever framed in the context of only men having agency. ​ Take the example of Partner A beating on Partner B because B started yelling at A for being out late. ​ If Partner A is a man, he is seen as being inherently toxic for reacting to having his ego "challenged by a woman" and that he is reasserting his power as prescribed by the doctrine of "toxic masculinity" ​ If Partner A is a woman, s…
/r/MensRights26/01/19 10:34 PM
10

Hilariously sexist. "Let's ask the gender I think are better suited to raising children about how they raise their children to not have preconceived notions of gender. Hurrdy Duurrr." What's worse is she'll likely report it as "reached out to parents" obfuscating her methods and data.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 01:46 PM
4

BuT MEn ArE StRonGer ThAn wOmEn
/r/MensRights22/01/19 11:04 PM
1

Spoil sport. I think a bit of self deprecating humour is what this sub needs every now and again. I chuckled. Also... Fuck Gillette
/r/MensRights22/01/19 10:58 PM
2

Kid. If you really are a kid. It is not ok and I'm pretty sure it's against the sub's rules if it's not against the site's rules to brigade another sub. Brigading isn't going to change their minds. They need to work it out for themselves. Spread happiness to the rest of the world and ignore that tiny group of misandrist losers. Promote something positive and by all means continue promoting men's rights. That means you have to set a good example though.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 07:13 PM
34

Go on. Tell us how treating men with respect and reaping the rewards pathetic?
/r/MensRights21/01/19 06:06 PM
1

Exactly. It's giving men hyper agency to the point that any minor transgression can be punished with full force and then turning around and stating that their actions aren't as bad because they don't have "systemic power"
/r/MensRights18/01/19 07:26 AM
4

Indeed. It's easy to fall into the black and white good and bad and that all it takes is to "tell people, bad behaviour is bad. Ok?" I think it's important to point out that Kelly was raised by a single mother and also sexually abused (by a woman). People don't want to think that there's a deeper issue than just teaching fundamental morals. That would require effort.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 06:35 PM
7

The context here grants the use of this language and singling out of women. Unfortunately the real issue is that male victims will never be talked about with out a change in culture.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 06:09 PM
3

Nah just down vote the idiots and leave their disgusting nonsense for the world to see.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 10:30 AM
1

I would also point out that women's violence is excused. It's renamed and reclassified as lesser or justified. The phrase "Preemptive self defense" springs to mind.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 10:27 AM
1

What I always find so annoying is the stark contrast between the frictionalised video being described, dispersed throughout the article, (with super annoying formatting tbh. I hate when articles do that.) And the real life examples. The frictionalised versions I think while still some amount or grey area and personal responsibility to make your discomfort known exists; it's hard to deny that they wouldn't pass a simple "would you do it to a man/sex you're not attracted to test". In my honest opi…
/r/MensRights13/01/19 10:06 AM
4

What was even the charge? There's absolutely no information in this article. It's just fear mongering and man hating.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 07:36 PM
3

: "It's a woman's choice to have sex outside marriage." I interpret this as "premarital sex" and not "extramarital sex" as implied by the meme. Am I wrong? The context is not quite clear not knowing the background.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 06:36 PM
9

She disappeared in the commotion if you read the whole thing.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 07:34 PM
25

They never engage. They know you have no power.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 07:28 PM
23

If you read the story she'd high tailed it out of there before anyone stopped her.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 07:26 PM
5

Message the mods. They'll let you back in. Although it'll auto ban you again if you post here. Please do ask though. The more people speak out they might eventually remove us off their blacklist.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 11:22 AM
7

I'd agree Clarkson doesn't have a leg to stand on. That being said I wouldn't be surprised about Nick Robinson. Jeremy just doesn't have much to lose by speaking out.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 12:07 PM
1

Jeremy or Nick?
/r/MensRights08/01/19 12:00 PM
7

This isn't news
/r/MensRights08/01/19 11:49 AM
8

My childhood friend genuinely did this. I have no doubt being transgender is a thing but this kid? I have doubts. We literally grew up together and best friends for a long time, told eachother about our weird ass sex dreams, watched Eddie Izzard's Dressed to Kill together (A British executive transvestite) from like the age of 11. He'd always been attention seeking and acting out since we were both bullied in highschool and when I hit a very minor emo phase, the one many of us are all too famili…
/r/PussyPass07/01/19 06:24 PM
1

(But PS if you're an adult gay man, yes that's not going to change, and us men need all the support we can get, including gay male, so your 100 per cent on the team if you want to be in my view). I glad that you're willing to be tolerant to stand together. That being said I'm not gay, I'm not even bi. I just think it's better to increase knowledge in the world, and increase a better understanding of our tiny place in the world. Ignorance breeds fear and fear breeds hate. That's the homosexual ag…
/r/MensRights05/01/19 11:17 PM
2

What is a moonie?
/r/MensRights28/12/18 07:57 AM
2

such antisocial things as 'quietly speaking out for the truth', such as last week when I said 'thank you', sarcastically, to the 'Reverend' at my daughter's 'Sunday' school who promoted homosexuality Sounds a lot like you're saying you have all the answers. Group sex, sadomasochism and porn aren't sexual orientations. Someone who's never heard of those things might not feel like they're missing out and you're probably correct in that children don't need to learn about those things just yet. A ga…
/r/MensRights27/12/18 09:26 AM
1

I'd be very careful referring to anything to do with religion as a "truth". You might not like gay people or agree with their "lifestyle" but your "choice" to be attracted to men or women is not much of a choice. There are a million religions and a million "truths". If you personally are attracted to the same sex but make a conscious decision to partner with women you have to realise that that is not how most people feel. A Sunday school teacher teaching you children that gay people exist isn't …
/r/MensRights26/12/18 08:05 PM
4

I give them the benefit of the doubt at first. They need evidence to change my mind. They pretty much think we're Nazis so I give them a minute to calm down and attempt to see we're human. But yeah when you're told you're ignorant but they then refuse to actually give you any information it's pretty clear they're just hateful supremacist idiots. They do a good enough job of making it very clear on their own without the need to point it out.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 06:17 AM
7

I mean give us a go. What do you have to lose? Or did you just come here to insult people?
/r/MensRights22/12/18 12:12 AM
8

Oh do enlighten us.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 10:41 PM
11

No matter how long you're an MRA it's still a surprise and just disappointing when people like you prove us right.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 07:55 PM
4

r/whoosh
/r/MensRights21/12/18 07:51 PM
2

I mean technically this is like the thong thing but one only seen this on this sub and Mensrights. I saw the story about using the thong as a defence everywhere.
/r/PussyPass20/12/18 03:39 PM
1

Well technically yes. But they aren't paid 70% of what men are paid. That's the important distinction. They earn 70% less because they work jobs that pay less than jobs men work. They also die ~95% less.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 05:43 PM
1

If this was a man this would be rape not just sexual assault.
/r/MensRights10/12/18 06:59 AM
1

Interesting how women can't commit a crime that is generally defined a "using a penis to penetrate another". Most FBI statistics before only very recently all use this definition. The United Kingdom shot down a petition last year to make the term gender neutral. Other countries pretty much all use this definition. So tell me against why aren't women rapists?
/r/MensRights10/12/18 12:42 AM
3

Ah I didn't realise that. So wearing that t-shirt is like walking around with "The final solution is the future" emblazoned on it.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 08:51 AM
28

It originates from a t shirt worn by a lesbian separatist artist in the 70s. That's really all I need to tell you to show that it was never about anything that could be construed as equality.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 01:41 PM
1

The judge needs to be struck off. His comments at the end shows he's just trying to punish "hook up" culture more than anything. Literally fuck him.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 01:55 AM
5

Well considering it's banning a father in what he can and cannot say, you may want to reconsider.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 02:43 PM
16

Banned from religious teaching? I'm an atheist but this has got to be a 1st amendment issue at that point?
/r/MensRights28/11/18 10:13 AM
2

Don't forget to tape over "towards women" and just leave "prevent violence" Everyone is happy.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 04:44 PM
2

Ticket bought. Happy to lift share to black horse road or red bridge tube station from the Cambridgeshire area.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 01:30 PM
4

Society still hadn't realised that even though they want men to express their emotions that includes when men are feeling hard done by by women. That's when everyone changes their mind and streets yelling "whiny man baby"
/r/MensRights08/11/18 04:41 PM
2

I don't know how active it is at the moment but r/mensrightslinks has some stuff. Geez that article linked looked bad I'll have to scrutinize it properly later but it's not exactly unbiased. Also who does research on memes? It's like doing research on puddles to see how deep water in the oceans can get.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 04:31 PM
10

You missed the point. Or I probably should have explained mine better. There's debate whether prison should be punitive or rehabilitative. Prison in the USA and most of the rest of the world have almost entirely punitive systems of prisons. Although that is somewhat an over simplification as there are a few work programs and GED programs in prison. Many of which have been phased out by for profit prisons since they realise without such programs reoffending is higher and they can make more money.…
/r/MensRights02/11/18 05:44 PM
11

Dude do not come at me with the dictionary definition of prison. unless you want me to turn around and give you the dictionary definition of feminism as a defence to this bulshit.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 05:22 PM
30

Prison is not therapy, it's punishment. Debate is still out on this one. I'm very much pro rehabilitation. That being said if there is a two tier system where men are punished and women are rehabilitated then it's absolutely disgusting.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 03:22 PM
4

404 error. Any other source?
/r/MensRights30/10/18 10:03 PM
6

Came here to say this. Since you're in a school setting is probably the best and most engaging topic. Everyone knows about the perceived bias against women but very few even consider it happens to men and boys. The fact there is good documented evidence for it makes presentation easier as the information is already there.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 10:50 AM
2

Well then it's irrelevant then. It's not an example of anything. Just of a victim narrative. May as well be a feminist writing for the rolling stone.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 12:53 PM
2

my figuring is that it's either true in which case is not very funny or is a made up story in which case it's irrelevant
/r/MensRights25/10/18 11:24 AM
2

Why is this tagged "humour"?
/r/MensRights25/10/18 11:01 AM
1

So what’s the easiest way not to need that consent recording? Just don’t rape someone. I love how this completely missed the point. I saw this back with the Henry Cavill thing. "Don't want to be labled a rapy? Just don't be rapy." It completely denies that women have agency to be vindictive on purpose and if their own accord.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 10:59 AM
9

It's long been said that once gay people start breaking up marriage law will become more equal. That being said I wouldn't put it passed any legislation introduced to simple just exclude same sex couples.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 11:21 AM
8

Everything in Feminism is about power and control. That's why they like to say they don't have any. It justifies them taking more. That's not what I'm talking about though. These are two separate things. Metoo being about power also isn't necessarily a bad thing, because despite an assault not being due to a desire for power, being assaulted does lead to feeling powerless. On an individual level taking that power back is important. That being said when you use an over inflated societal power to …
/r/MensRights21/10/18 11:00 AM
7

It's not about power. That is once again a Feminist line based on falsified observation and deliberate rewording to fit a narrative. Sexual assault is just that... About sexual gratification. Sexual assault doesn't give anyone power but if they have the power to sexually assault people and they want to, that's when people feel they can get away with it. Edit: This isn't to say war rape doesn't happen as a power and intimidation tool, or that in rare instances it's about power, but the over archi…
/r/MensRights21/10/18 10:49 AM
8

In this case she is specifically referencing her experience. You can certainly dismiss it as anecdotal. Her piece is interesting though. She obviously realises that most issues black people face, disproportionately effect men. You can see the oppression Olympic gymnastics trying to dismiss men's problems and say that trafficking is the real problem. Human trafficking is obviously an issue that needs to be tackled but let's face the real world numbers are going to be no where near as high as male…
/r/MensRights18/10/18 02:07 PM
356

r/nicegirls on steroids. What a hideously entitled piece of shit.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 11:27 AM
7

So if my understanding is correct "Fresh complaints" are tantamount to hear say and is essentially "I make a report that X happened and because I also told a friend that X happened that that is proof that X happened"...?
/r/MensRights18/10/18 11:15 AM
4

This is such an important message. The amount that guys don't call out women's bad behaviour and then redefine their experience in order to deal with it is something that I think even other guys have a hard time empathising with let alone women. Men are just so used to "getting on with it" that most people don't even recognise when men get hurt. I don't even necessarily think it's a bad trait. It's that stoicism that keeps society going. However where it become a hindrance is that others just do…
/r/MensRights18/10/18 10:51 AM
1

Is this Titania McGrath's Twitter? It sounds like her/them. She's a well known troll.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 10:30 PM
14

I think Alison Tieman puts it best in her ICMI 2018 speech. Male Feminists aren't any different from old fashioned men. Both are just "savers of women" they must save women in their new way "The right way" and anyone that goes against that is a threat to women. We must save them after all. It's an identity.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 09:49 PM
0

Things are changing. Continuing to take the high ground can be tough but many people are waking up to men's issues. It's slow but better than the violent alternative. Just look at how radical far lefties types have been driving more and more support for Trump. Men need to be the strong peaceful advocates that push through the shit.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 06:44 PM
1

I’m significantly more likely to be the victim of sexual assault than I am being wrongfully accused of sexual assault by a massive margin (in fact I’m already a victim a few times over) but no one seems to be panicking about sparing men from that horrible crime You may or may not have seen my comment but that's actually the reason I no longer drink at parties. It's not to cover my back but to protect front so to speak. That still doesn't mean you can't do both.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 03:50 PM
1

"not making a move" is still a move. I assumed this was what you were getting at. It's a difference of opinion and that's cool. I just don't think it's the best way to go about it. I think there's enough slack in the system that a reasonable portion of men could essentially exit the system and the men who stay, put up shut up and to put it vulgarly "clean up". Sure they'll have all the bad outcomes men experience now but they'll ignore it like always. My other thought and in my opinion more impo…
/r/MensRights11/10/18 12:18 PM
1

It's no movement (although people conflate it to be so) other than that, yeah men are (so am I). I think regardless of whether it's a group of people banding together over a cause, or just a group of people acting in a similar way and making the same decisions for the same reasons, I think you can still call it a movement even if it's not organised. The LGBT movement isn't anything other than a bunch of people who share a characteristic that finally banded together to try and make societal and l…
/r/MensRights10/10/18 09:41 PM
6

The irony being I don't put it past men to be capable of doing so. White knights abound and society is still gynocentric, to the point I think it's not out of the question. I don't think it will ever come to it though, I see the push back already, and most people don't hate men. That being said with movements like MGTOW I think there's a risk of men excluding themselves. Even I find myself doing it sometimes.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 05:02 PM
1

However we've seen how ballistic the media goes if it's something where boys are involved as is the case with college incidents Correct me if I'm wrong but most people in college are at least 18. No longer minors. Teachers also aren't minors. That being said I don't doubt there is reporting bias. The issue my friend had was mostly due to them both being minors. There was no point pursuing any action as it would be impossible to get any real justice. The girl would likely get a caution if anythin…
/r/MensRights09/10/18 04:48 PM
1

Stephen Fry, a true national treasure. I hope he makes a speedy recovery.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 03:57 PM
17

This is an issue that I think it's being under reported due to the fact minors are involved. A dear friend of mines son was accused by his girlfriend after her mum was concerned about a stomachache the girl was having and started prying about her sex life. I'm not even sure if they were active but they were 15 so it's not out of the question, but every accusation she made was when they weren't even together. One time she made up he was in hospital having an operation. He was then accused a secon…
/r/MensRights09/10/18 02:59 PM
2

It's simply talking basic precautions, looking both ways crossing the street, locking doors. That type of thing. Unless you're completely oblivious, I'm sure you do somethings listed here.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 01:28 PM
5

I lock my car doors while I'm driving or just sitting in a car park (eating on the road or whatever). I make sure I'm aware of my surroundings. Carry medical kits, and bright torches where ever possible. No weapons allowed here, but I used to carry a gun. I tell friends and family where I am and keep my phone on. I've de-escalated any situation I've ever gotten into by remaining calm and using physical cover such as not getting out of my vehicle when being verbally accosted. It's better to keep …
/r/MensRights09/10/18 12:48 PM
1

No. If migrants made it out this far they'd have to integrate and fast. It's not like in the cities where everyone is 5 minutes away and whole communities can get away without speaking English, like in Bradford. That's the only reason they're able to get away with it. They keep it in their communities and the girls they rape are generally selected for their vulnerability such those with poor behaviour or family problems. You just can't keep that sort of thing quiet when Mrs Hubbard down the road…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 03:23 PM
3

Well they're just not doing their job. I can definitely fault them for that but honestly, I'd rather be left alone than have to worry about being pulled over by armed thugs every other day. Living in the country, it's really not bad and a completely different world. I lived in Bradford for a bit. It's kinda bad but keep yourself to yourself and you're alright. If I had kids thatd be a different story. I'd watch them like a hawk. You also have to watch out for the heroin addicts, who are mostly a…
/r/MensRights01/10/18 09:55 AM
51

He had cops waiting around his house pulling him over every other day. I hear this so often on Reddit. Why is it so pervasive yet noone seems to be able to do anything? It really flips the whole "few bad apples" idea on its head. I don't think I've ever heard anything similar happening in the UK, and if it did it was probably a one off.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 09:43 AM
1

While I essentially agree with you. My point was that specifically the bystanders should come in and restrain her. The same way they would have supposedly restrained him, unless they just chose to beat the shit out of him.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 12:20 AM
1

AND THAT'S THE PROBLEM. PEOPLE NEED TO INTERVENE
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:10 PM
1

This isn't domestic violence though. Just because it's against a woman it doesn't automatically become "domestic". Violence against women is very rare. Domestic violence is more or less equal. Sure more women are murdered and I'm not arguing that, but that is not a justification to ignore a man when he is being attacked.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 04:38 PM
1

Women are like men. If you see them beating on someone else, you intervene. Unless you feel the risk to yourself is too great. In this case the bystanders obviously felt justified stepping in when he became violent. So it's not like they were scared of being hurt. It's sexist idiots like you that perpetuate nonsense like this.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 01:21 PM
1

Eeeeerrr... Yes you do. You stop them and tell them that it's wrong to hit people. I hope you're not a parent.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 09:06 AM
1

You don't have to hit a woman to restrain her.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 06:46 AM
2

Not a dig. Empathy man. I'm being sincere.
/r/PussyPass29/09/18 08:31 PM
4

Your point about women are being brought up to believe they are just as strong as men. They aren't. I've seen a few people try to argue the whole idea that boys are just socialized to be more active and thus become stronger. But it's not wide spread. They might be being brought up to believe they can be just as stoic and mentally strong as men and that's what I mean when I say there is nothing wrong with that.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 04:25 PM
11

Absolutely this. Why noone stepped in before he reacted always boggles my mind.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 04:17 PM
10

While I have seen a few examples of this, for the most part I don't think this is what is being taught. Strength is usually being referred to as "emotional" strength. It's stupid and definitely a platitude but there's nothing inherently wrong with it either. What I am seeing though is that girls are being taught that they can hit guys and that they'll receive literally zero consequences, while a man who defends himself will be doubly screwed.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 04:14 PM
-3

I totally understand it truly is. OP has his own story though. That's what I'm referring to. Edit autocorrect
/r/PussyPass29/09/18 03:50 PM
10

Jeez I bet shit like this really rubs you the wrong way.
/r/PussyPass29/09/18 02:22 PM
5

I think it depends on the situation. You can definitely take tasteful nude photos of men and having viewed as art. Do you have a particular example in mind?
/r/MensRights25/09/18 11:30 AM
5

I'm alive, and I'm glad I am. It's been a hard little while, topping off with my dog dying last week but I'm doing ok. I went swimming for the first time in years yesterday and I'm exhausted today but in a good way. I'm planning some visits around the country next week to look at masters courses and I'm finally getting to grips with my current job, even if it's not exactly what I want to be doing. I'm ok
/r/MensRights25/09/18 11:17 AM
2

It would appear that op was actually trying to prove the opposite. They support us.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 10:23 AM
1

Not if consensus says otherwise. And it looks like there is little agreement with it.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 08:25 AM
3

Language is meant to convey meaning. If it's not conveying the meaning, that we don't know the gender in the situation, there is room for it to evolve. Why try and protect wording that harms men?
/r/MensRights15/09/18 08:15 AM
2

Build it and they will come. It was on the nose when his reply to the question of "Have you been asked why you didn't just leave?" (The PC way of asking "Why didn't you leave") "Well yeah, but people are more understanding since there's nowhere to go" Edit: autocorrect
/r/MensRights15/09/18 08:10 AM
2

It's not E.g "Where's the new intern?" "They went to the make tea for everyone" The "they" in this case is singular and gender neutral since we don't know the gender of the intern.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 08:00 AM
1

I don't think pointing out people who have a vested interest in said policies are the best people to try and align with rationality. That's essentially what headlines like this do.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 07:47 AM
2

Yougov isn't the government. They're a private date collection company. While widely respected, they aren't the government or an agency of the government.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 07:30 AM
1

*allegedly
/r/MensRights15/09/18 07:13 AM
2

This is literally the perfect place to you "they/them" pronouns. This looks like Duluth inspired material.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 06:58 AM
8

Depends why she had a gun. Also to me it seems that the fact she only fired one shot seems more calculated than a crime of passion and the way she acted after, all point to the idea she had at least gone over it before hand. I realise people do weird shit when stressed, as killing someone would likely result in, but I won't be surprised when the next thing we hear of this is that the ex husband was allegedly abusive and gets off with a suspended or very short sentence for voluntary manslaughter.…
/r/PussyPass11/09/18 02:15 PM
34

She apparently has only been charged with 2nd degree murder. The fact it isn't 1st degree murder is a pass in itself. If you turn up to a kid swap with a gun that she likely wasn't legally allowed to have then that's pretty much all the evidence you need.
/r/PussyPass11/09/18 11:35 AM
1

Not to be pedantic but aren't children in the USA often tried as adults? Well maybe not often, but it's not exactly uncommon.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 11:15 PM
1

That's not currently what this bill is though. If there are police instructions somewhere else then I'm happy to reconsider but at the moment the bill currently being proposed does no such thing. If there is a change down the line then by all means we should keep an eye out for it but I do not think this is a bill we need or even should be opposing. Edit: autocorrect.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 08:39 PM
1

GUYS THE BILL BEING DISCUSSED IS NOT ABOUT MISOGYNY. It is only a bill to make upskirting a crime, a crime that would then fall under the sexual offenders' registry. I believe the media are performing a bait and switch to invoke a reaction using unclear, misleading and inflammatory titles. A reaction that will only be used (and rightfully so in this case) to discredit our movement. Link to the bill and information is here Edit: I WAS WRONG Clause 1, page 2, line 13, at end insert— “(4A) Where a …
/r/MensRights05/09/18 07:32 PM
2

Does anyone here actually know what the bill is called? ​ I'm looking and the only thing that seems to be up in the house of Commons today is the [Voyeurism Offences No 2 Bill 2017 19](https://services.parliament.uk/Bills/2017-19/voyeurismoffencesno2.html\] and it basically just adds upskirting to the list of offences deemed voyeurism. Nothing about misogyny as a hate crime as far as I can see. Is there something I've missed? Edit: sorry I really don't know how to format
/r/MensRights05/09/18 06:02 PM
4

Yeah "nobody" actually lives in the city of London. It's basically just businesses.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 02:06 PM
2

Yeah sorry about that. Every article i looked at had that type of format. My guess was that no paper wanted to put their interpretation on the story in fear that they'd pick the wrong side and catch shit for it.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 08:40 PM
1

The "buglary" analogy has always bothered me as I don't think it's a fair comparison in most cases. In the rare case where someone is ambushed while out jogging or walking home at night then it is probably a fair comparison. However it is generally even more rare that those cases aren't taken seriously. ​ A better analogy of the majority of cases, where it is a close aquaintance who is the accused, would be about the dispute of who owns a lawn mower after lending it to your neighbour. You say yo…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:27 PM
3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4njy0-82KW8&t=21s ​ Video of the incident
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:03 PM
5

Fragile masculinity*
/r/MensRights02/09/18 04:51 PM
24

You forgot A small penis reference Patriarchy hurts men too Yeah but it effects women more Whiny /man baby .... There's probably more but this is just today.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 04:32 PM
3

Just because someone isn't dying doesn't mean it isn't a crisis or that it shouldn't be taken seriously. While they are connected issues they are still separate. 22% of all girls is definitely a huge number. The 10% of boys is also a huge number. The suicide rate is currently 1 in 10,000 while the current rate for self harm is 1 in 10. So by tackling self harm you have the ability to help 1000 X more boys, while at the same time likely reducing the amount of suicide at the same time. This isn't …
/r/MensRights31/08/18 02:20 PM
7

From A META-ANALYSIS OF THE INTERNATIONAL GENDER WAGE GAP Doris Weichselbaumer Results 6.1 Effects of Data and Method Although all of the above-described weighting approaches are somewhat arbi- trary and have some particular drawbacks, the general results are very similar.15 The biggest – and very consistent – impact on the gender wage gap results from the type of data set used... If you cherry pick results you get a wage gap. In comparison to a random sample of the population, the gender wage g…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 01:29 PM
2

Suicide is a form of self harm. I don't really need to say more.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 01:11 PM
1

Do you have a link to the interview you quoted? I'd be interested in viewing or reading it.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 10:43 AM
31

This needs to be taught to so many men.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 10:22 AM
1

Honestly I still hold to this day it was a 50/50 chance for which side would end up with a fatality. Most people there weren't Nazis. They just got the media coverage. Antifa are just as bad, they just don't have the history to bolster them. I don't like Trump nor did I vote for him but of all the examples for which you could have chosen to demonstrate his biases, which I do think he has, similar to other men his age. That was not it. Hell simply "Mexico sends their rapists" is a fairly damning …
/r/MensRights30/08/18 10:05 AM
1

Can you not. The whole point of this thread is to not fight about trump. Name calling is exactly the problem. Lefties are welcome here as much as you are.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 09:39 AM
4

Obviously "not all" but It's definitely common. I had a room mate and his best friend both were being tracked via an app on their phones both of their girlfriends (also friends) had put on them. They would constantly be checking their Facebook profile and really over the line levels of intrusion. Things that if a woman told anyone about would be immediate red flags. They would constantly be in a fight over one thing or another. Generally over nothing as far as I could tell, and often performativ…
/r/MensRights30/08/18 08:19 AM
2

Yeah but you make some interesting posts so you got that going for you.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 09:27 PM
1

I love how the Feminists are so Ableist when discussing Incels. They ignore the number of males who are involuntarily Celibate due to Disability. As the majority of women are able bodied they see disabled men as more like pets and animals in a zoo than actual males. They also Invariable assume all incles are Heterosexual. A Queer incel represents zero threat so they can't have them recognised as even existing. Well even Feminists aren't so stupid as to punch so low as to ridicule disabled men. I…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 08:45 PM
7

I don't think most incels could name a men's rights issue. Even suicide. I think they just think it's a normal way to think if you're not a Brad Pitt lookalike. The uproar is fairly predictable tbh. "LOOK AT THESE MEN BEING MEAN ABOUT WOMEN.... ON THE INTERNET NO LESS" it's the perfect combination of gynocentrism entwined with the under pinnings of fear mongering in favour of control over the internet. It's obviously not a big deal in terms of numbers or actual risk but it's almost tailor made t…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 07:56 PM
4

While the format was cringy some of the experts were fairly reasonable pointing out that incels are a bigger risk to themselves. It's a double edged sword. It's an issue you either ignore and nothing changes or someone looks at it and you have to bare the fact that incels do say fucked up things. Some of the quotes about "women's position" seemed a little embellished tbh but who knows. That being said the things I've seen some Feminists say fairly publicly is often comparative to the worst thing…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 05:37 PM
3

Absolutely. Pointing out the hypocrisy is definitely needed and that's where i think taking the high ground and defending due process will hopefully start to change people's minds. If there are enough examples, eventually people will realise why innocent until proven guilty is the only way things can work.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 11:14 AM
3

Two wrongs... Let's not get petty. It does nothing for our movement other than make us look like petulant children. We have enough bad fake press without people like you actually giving them real ammunition.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 11:10 AM
3

Honestly I think we've reached peak woman to the point I don't think this is true anymore. Almost every advertising board is solely women unless it's specifically family oriented in a group or clothes and maybe occasionally you'll get a picture of 2 women and a man. Everything else is just background noise that adding a man into an advert about mental health and weakness might actually draw a double take due to its current scarcity
/r/MensRights20/08/18 03:52 PM
4

This is specifically about the NHS there are long term care facilities but if we are talking about very sick hospitalised patients then they'll be on a ward. Wards are divided into gender specific bays of usually 6 to 8 beds. I've not worked in that area of medicine so it might be different. I'm guessing as it's not super common and space is limited they'll have a small ward and even fewer bays. The fewer bays and discrepancy in gender split will mean basically all of those beds will be for wome…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 03:11 PM
4

Unfortunately one somewhat plays into the other. Our society and therefore democracy is informed or misinformed by the media. Without accurate information people can't vote on issues that concern them and therefore no laws or processes will change.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 11:54 AM
11

It's funny, Feminists are constantly trying to claim the false equivalence or men's issues. "MGM is a false equivalence to FGM" "subs like r/menkampf are a false equivalence" because obviously comparing Jewish people to white people or men is completely absurd to them. But this? Oh this is apparently completely the same thing.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 05:44 AM
6

Be the change you want to see. I personally don't have a huge issue with this post. It's somewhat pertinent to this sub and maybe this is how low my expectations have fallen in general in our clickbait climate but I never really put too much owners on the title. You can disagree though. My main complaint here is the amount of reposts and duplicate articles. It's getting sort of ridiculous when is short space you see 4 or 5 articles about the same thing. The other thing being "SJW Owned" content …
/r/MensRights11/08/18 07:25 AM
1

Pessimism bores me.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 03:23 PM
1

Why not? Google is arguably one of the most influential companies in the world. You may not look at it but literally millions of people do. Regular people, many of whom's exposure to men's rights is negative.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 01:59 PM
1

That's a fair criticism. It not my petition but I have contacted the person who's it is. Hopefully it will be changed.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 10:44 AM
5

Thanks, there's no harm in trying. Pessimism is the bane of this sub. It feeds perfectly into their narrative that MRAs don't do anything but complain.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 09:38 AM
2

Well I'm advocating for equal and unbiased treatment in court. That's one of the many faces of the men's rights movement. That's exactly a reason why we exist. Of course right now it's all just noise but it's our noise that is starting to be heard. Hopefully that noise will lead to change. Injustice is always anger inducing. Wrongs that can be put right absolutely should be but after a point we can't fix the past, only learn from it.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 03:38 PM
2

I have no evidence, but as explained by the second half of my comment, it could be easily countered by an equally vapid complaint that the mother cried or is emotionally weak too. The judge would have to give adequate reason to believe one over the other. I'm not sure what situation a father opening up could be held against him, any more than a mother opening up if everyone is on equal footing to begin with. As I said I realise your current concerns as you may absolutely be right under the curre…
/r/MensRights24/07/18 03:09 PM
3

Well this is where we need to make shared custody the default. I realise your concerns but this is why the movement is multi faceted. We need many changes, not just one or two. Having default custody would likely lead to accusations like that having less sway as both could equally argue the other is insane at which point neither is worse than the other and shared custody still stands or the kids are taken away which should be a deterrent to such childish behaviour in the first place.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 02:38 PM
4

Let's not forget most IPV is reciprocal. She very well may need the shelter, if she chose to leave and needs an intermediate accommodation. I think that's best for everyone. Also a reason men need shelters too. I haven't seen the statistics but I remember watching an interview of Erin Pizzey stating that the introduction of women's shelters actually decreased the murder of male partners, while the murder rate of female partners has stayed fairly consistent.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 02:00 PM
5

Agreed. This appears to be a joke completely unrelated to the story. I was a little worried that they were referring to a black eye but this just seems to be trolling his appearance. I'm ok with it as I am with the reverse.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 01:49 PM
1

I have to admit I never saw any petition so at least on my part it wasn't apathy but just lack of exposure.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 05:54 AM
10

It's that same with buying power but try explaining that to a feminist. They'll tell you they're oppressed because they "have to buy more". This is an over exaggeration... But not by much.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 07:41 AM
5

He can always be bi.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 12:20 PM
1

They still made assumptions though, and that's the problem. It's a different assumption but it's still an assumption.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 02:01 PM
1

But as the article would suggest I think the bias of the type of name used has a much bigger influence than the "sound" of a name. It might matter if you have an odd spelling such a Kayt (Kate). But for a super common name I doubt the sound of the word has any bearing. Although this is an experiment in itself.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:37 PM
1

This is interesting. I've always wondered why they have to choose a similar sounding name. Why not just choose a similarly common name like Jess or Kate?
/r/MensRights06/07/18 11:35 AM
3

Do you regret seeking a lawyer, or was it beneficial even if they couldn't directly represent you?
/r/MensRights04/07/18 12:53 PM
1

I don't condone it when a minor indiscretion is held against a man so I don't condone it now. It's not the way to change people's minds.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 02:32 PM
1

You say that but it does not appear to be true Presented as an assertion with no evidence = "nahh uhh" And... "Dehumanize"? leave the SJW/feminist lingo for tumblr. Present an actual argument and we can go from there. =Stop being an SJW. It doesn't criticise the actual content. You just dismissed it out of hand on ideological grounds. Or is your memory really that short?
/r/MensRights26/06/18 10:54 AM
1

You have yet to present any arguments. So far your arguments can be literally summed up with "Nah uuuh" and "stop being an SJW"
/r/MensRights26/06/18 09:51 AM
1

The rest of your comment is irrelevant until or unless you answer the direct question from the previous comment. That's not how ideas or debate works. My ideas are valid or invalid independently of one another. Even so I feel like there is a little projection going on here if you are going to hold the conversation hostage, to force a point that should already be clear. In the spirit of good faith however, to be very clear... The answer is NO! That does not mean I won't try to persuade others to …
/r/MensRights26/06/18 09:20 AM
1

So reminding people that men are human beings in the same way Advertising merely reminds you of the existence of a product Is thought policing?
/r/MensRights26/06/18 08:10 AM
0

I'm not forcing anyone. People are still free to do what they want. I'm fairly sure that was a perfect analogy. What is it that you disagree with?
/r/MensRights26/06/18 07:57 AM
1

By that logic, you have no reason to harass them. I'm not harassing. I think you misunderstand my goals. I'm not trying to subjugate anyone. It's a hell of a jump from a thought provoking retort to full on subjugation. Influencing and thought policing are two very different things. Adverts for instance, influence you to buy the product they're promoting. Governments police you into paying taxes and the services that go along with them. Two very different ways of going about getting people's mone…
/r/MensRights26/06/18 07:48 AM
0

If you feel men's right activism would be based around purely legal rights then that's cool, I support that. IMO the way to influence that is to make people care and want to change those laws. Numerous studies show time and time again how people view men as expendable. As long as that's the general mindset, little will change. I'm not policing anyone's thoughts, I'm trying to challenge them, and change them organically. I support free speech and would never want to limit it. That doesn't mean ch…
/r/MensRights26/06/18 06:46 AM
0

Dismissing is an easy way to ignore the problem but it does nothing to challenge the cultural anti male bias. In order to help change people's perceptions, decrease the empathy gap and challenge the idea that men are there to just take shit, you need to challenge everyday misandry in calm and constructive ways.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 06:17 AM
2

Which is essentially what happened.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 06:16 AM
3

This is an interesting avenue. Maybe not appropriate in that situation but I'm sure definitely useful elsewhere.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 07:17 PM
7

My long term is to have an arsenal of non-offensive retorts. My aim isn't to completely humiliate or bully it's to make people stop and think. Hearts and minds. So many people have a very casual negative opinion of men because society has allowed it, uncontested. Complimenting men is almost non-existant while women are held up and praised at the slightest thing. It creates a bias that I think most people just take for granted. The son thing did pop to mind but at the time I wasn't sure who that …
/r/MensRights24/06/18 05:11 PM
10

I appreciate your response but I personally don't think direct shaming tactics are the way to go. They know it's sexist however they also know that it's far more socially acceptable. It's that kind of response that would lead to "manbaby" comments.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 01:10 PM
22

Oh exactly. This is what I'm getting at. It doesn't bother me in the slightest. Hence a the need for a quick one liner to point out the hypocrisy without seeming like I'm over reacting.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 12:48 PM
1

Sure why not. If the same logic applies and standards met, I'm ok with it. If there's a case in the future of the reverse happening, I'll be outraged. Until then it's a one in a billion event that isn't really a men's rights issue. It's certainly a bodily integrity issue but an n of one means that there are no other cases for which to judge. This may even change the course of things to come given it was a man to go first. I don't doubt that it may have gone differently were it a woman, but as yo…
/r/MensRights20/06/18 12:35 PM
5

Honestly I don't see this as any different from using frozen eggs and having a surrogate. This is such a rare case and there are no victims as the man is already dead. It's not like she can sue for child support. They were a couple before he died and as the evidence put forward suggests, it was his wish to have children.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 12:04 PM
2

Those are some interesting ideas. Definitely something to be discussed. I think there are pros and cons to both of those. My main criticism is that this kind of content is completely the wrong message that needs to be sent across this sub. As The men's rights sub it's the poster board for our movement. I'm not saying go full ban happy like r/ feminism but it needs to be challenged, strongly.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 07:07 PM
2

It's not a great video in other ways considering childless women goes against the incel idea that all women have it easy and get impregnated by Chad or Tyrone and collect neet bux. There are a multitude of factors far more complex than anything out forward and the only other option that you are eventually led to is that all women need to do is just be told to choose incels or face being childless. Honestly it's not a convincing argument.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 05:15 PM
2

Other wonderful comments from op include I'm against the mixing of Italians with for instance Swedes. A lot of Trump fans are center right, which means they haven't fully embraced racial politics. This was from just 30 seconds of scrolling. Who knows what else OP believes. He's a literal white supremacist. He has shitty ideas and nothing he has said has convinced me it was tongue in cheek.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 04:00 PM
1

It's not a quote mine. They are two separate ideas both presented as valid Ideas: 1) female enslavement 2) other It doesn't even matter what the other is. You've already legitimised the criticism levied against you.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 03:46 PM
4

But neither of those options are "valid" or "possible"
/r/MensRights19/06/18 03:35 PM
3

even tho I think rounding up women like they did in Auschwitz and turning them into sex slaves to solve the incel problem is a possible and valid solution... Possible and valid solution If you cannot see why this isn't down right insane then there are bigger problems than not being able to find a partner. If you want to pass it off as edgy I think you'd have to do better than use an unemotional monotone. I'm someone more than willing to give the biggest benefit of the doubt, but if I'm unable to…
/r/MensRights19/06/18 03:30 PM
7

I don't think it quite fits what I was getting at. Maybe I'm just not seeing it. It's definitely interesting though. I however do often see this line of reasoning by feminists that "MRAs are complaining about a hidden epidemic that doesn't exist." While there's a possibility that this is true I think the circumstantial evidence surrounding reporting. The fact that women have huge support and still fail to report, but then realising men still face huge discrimination for coming forward. Stories l…
/r/MensRights19/06/18 02:41 PM
3

Definitely try a kilt
/r/MensRights19/06/18 01:37 PM
10

It's interesting the number of conspired murders the women commit, where as it would appear all the murders committed by men were performed independently. I'm glad they've been included though. I'm just going off the headlines so if I miss one that's why.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 01:36 PM
2

We don't need an alternative. What the fuck. Lying about anything is the issue. Believing the victim out right is a stupid precedent. Not to mention that unless you walk into a boxing ring or variation there of, no one asks to be beaten up. There is physical evidence of injury. Rape is in many cases indistinguishable from consentual sex. Your idea is retarded on so many levels.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 12:09 PM
1

You lost me not only at the poor title but at the part where the video literally calls for the enslavement of women into sexual subserviencey. I've been sticking up for incels recently under the impression that they were being miss characterised but if you are actually going to spew such opinions then you only bring it on yourself.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 12:03 PM
10

Just after 7:30 he tries to make the argument that equality isn't about quality of life. He literally goes on to say in no uncertain terms that power and money are what's important. Proving that this is all feminism (well this feminist) really cares about.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 03:53 PM
6

Proportionately, though, women do die more, almost twice as many relative to # of riders. Is that based on that one year or is that a pattern across the board over multiple years? If it's a consistent pattern then sure I'm willing to concede my point however. 10 out of 13 is a disproportionately high number but considering its 13 out of 6 million odd. Even if you were to say only 5% cycle that's still 300000 people cycling. The likelihood that one year happened to have a disproportionately high …
/r/MensRights15/06/18 08:04 AM
59

Men still make up 80% of all injuries, which makes sense considering men ride bikes twice as much as women and take more risks. They had to go all the way back to 2009 to find a year when a majority of women of an already tiny number of people were killed.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 09:41 PM
1

Essentially, that is somewhat the problem I think though.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 11:21 AM
1

Absolutely. I'm not saying that chasm is filled with one side or the other either. There are obviously multiple factors that go into it. There are both the innocent and guilty in there. I think knowing that percentage split would be important in trying to counter the narrative currently set forward.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 10:59 AM
1

Reading some of the other comments it would also seem to be an inability to disconnect between an unqualifiable number of rapes that go unreported, and a statistic that by necessity involves the reporting of rape. Their logic is as far as I can establish that even if 90% of rapes that are reported aren't true, that on average because many go unreported, that over all it works out. It's coming from the place that they may very well have had a friend who was raped that never reported and that they…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 10:15 AM
5

It's a misunderstanding of statistics. Considering that only 8% of rape cases/accusations (I'm not sure which) ever lead to a conviction, you could validly say that 92% of rape are false accusations. Yes only 2-8% or sometimes much higher depending on the sample size are provably false in the same way 8% are provably true ignoring miscarriages of justice. So there's a huge casm in the middle of ~80% that people forget about, choosing to assign it to which ever side they agree with. Edit: autocor…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 09:51 AM
10

I won't be surprised if we see in less than 5 years that girls being denied an education has dropped from 53% of children to well below 50/50, at which point funding will still be funneled to girls.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 11:27 PM
7

This looks like it was copy and pasted out of the Duluth manual.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 10:00 PM
2

It depends on the law and where you are. I know in the UK the defamation laws are far more protective of the potentially defamed where as in the USA it protects the person making the allegations.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 07:52 PM
2

...or even charged There is also likely caveats in regards to celebrities having their picture run next to allegations... Because they're just allegations so it's not defamation.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 07:16 PM
1

No it's pixilated because he has not been convicted or even charged with a crime. Because of this they need his permission to post a picture that solely identifies him.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 07:06 PM
1

While I somewhat agree with your sentiments, I'm trying to get out in front of it and be the change and the movement I want to see. I've only recently started to publicly identify as an MRA despite having followed the movement for sometime now. I try not to pit myself against women. I simply and calmly state that men have legal issues and societal pressures that lead to a large array of undesirable outcomes. Although I will call out feminism where it is easily demonstrable such as with domestic …
/r/MensRights05/06/18 10:36 PM
6

The rationale that The reason for the discrepancy in the numbers is that males tend to use firearms, while females tend to use poison, which has a substantially greater chance of survival. Is flawed as other studies show men complete more often regardless of method used. It was then discovered that the suicidality of men and women is different and that for a completion several factors must be reached. Men are far more likely to fill those factors while women only fill a portion so only "attempt"…
/r/MensRights05/06/18 10:27 PM
5

What does this have to do with men's rights? People are free to make themselves look stupid no matter what their sex is.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 10:12 PM
11

What does this have to do with men's rights? People are free to make themselves look stupid no matter what their sex is.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 10:11 PM
37

You obviously haven't watched 13 reasons why then. This whole series spent the entire time attributing the worst character's (the rapist) traits to all men, while ignoring that main character (a boy) along with mostly other boys spending the entire time trying to track down evidence. Taking beatings, psychological intimidation and surviving attempted murders. What are the other girls doing? Not coming forward or lying in court and destroying evidence. They are then rewarded and admired for being…
/r/MensRights03/06/18 09:30 PM
194

That guy was specifically never portrayed as a "nice guy" so I don't know what they're getting at. He was always a shoddy embodiment of their version of douchey male entitlement and privilege.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 03:41 PM
1

I'd advise against talking to the guy. That could be seen as collusion and void any of impact you could have. Speak to the police or the defence attorney.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 09:46 PM
3

So why should women have the right to not have responsibilities to their child? Abortion aside they can still give the child up for adoption in some cases without the father's consent. How would the reverse be any different apart from the child actually gets to remain with the mother.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 04:34 PM
2

You poor innocent child. Welcome. That's pretty much their MO, anything that doesn't 100% agree with them the ban hammer comes down.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 12:32 PM
2

I feel bad but at the same time a little tickled that your r-Feminism post has had zero interaction. Have you been banned yet?
/r/MensRights19/05/18 12:15 PM
6

I'm definitely left wing. I'm in favour of social programs that would support communities of any type that need help. I think prison is almost entirely useless and that Norway's approach (specifically to this issue I can't say about their other policies) seems to be working and the best way to heal everyone and not just satisfy a public sense of retribution. It's these types of policies that make me left wing. That being said. I've come to realise that to the general public that it's as much abo…
/r/MensRights19/05/18 06:26 AM
1

I'm curious too. I don't think there's any risk she could be prosecuted for having an abortion if it was abroad. Her whole account is gone though so maybe it was another reason
/r/MensRights18/05/18 06:20 AM
3

Paternity fraud and reproductive coercion Why should a rape victim pay his adult rapist child support?
/r/MensRights18/05/18 06:16 AM
3

Its a good thing it's still in my cliptray then. I actually don't disagree with her post. Like many as much as I hate it I am pro-choice. I’m sorry, I need to rant. Over the past few months, Ireland has been gearing up to a referendum on the eighth amendment that protects the unborn and makes abortion illegal subject to a 14 year prison sentence for the woman (and/or any doctor who helps her) I’m exhausted. I’m so sad writing this. I feel dehumanised. I feel scared. I feel like my country is bel…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 06:13 AM
6

https://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/8k3se6/i_am_tired_of_my_life_not_being_equal_to_that_of/?utm_source=reddit-android The original post
/r/MensRights17/05/18 03:56 PM
12

I think most posts deal with just "life" things like couples and pregnancy. Things that are human issues like pregnancy and grief among others. Not too much for feminism to actually get it's teeth into when it's obviously noones fault . Its also probably just a case that most women are fairly normal non hateful people and can see both sides. It's likely it's just the minority ruining it, and it's quite likely that those loud minority sought the power to do so by being mods and what not. (Side ra…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 06:08 PM
57

IT GOT REMOVED!!!???? That really brightened my day earlier. Even though I've been banned from there for a while now I'm still subscribed, mostly to eye roll at their stupidity and occasionally see real issues some women face. But this was just really nice. Completely harmless in my opinion and a life affirming post. Its not even like the comments disagreed with her. Maybe I missed it but there wasn't even any stupid trying to justify it like saying..."Well men earn more so they don't need compl…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 05:37 PM
3

I believe the 1 in 4 number refers to sexual assault. Many people have said it comes from a Mary koss study. A couple of points being sexual assault is not rape. It would be like saying that 1 in 3 men are murdered instead of just assaulted. It's wrong but often not that bad to warrant police action. There are other flaws including a low response rate to the questionnaire which may cause a selection bias and the study essentially excludes men or uses "man" as the perpetrator
/r/MensRights11/05/18 11:03 AM
2

I would argue it's similar to other answers above in that Feminists claim "men can't talk about their feelings". What they want to hear is a feminised expression of feelings or a gynocentric focus to their feelings. Their statement implies (and I've had many conversations that would back it up) that men can't talk about their feelings because other men stop them. Simply put that is not true. Men in the presence of other men whom they trust absolutely talk about their feelings. Whenever men actua…
/r/MensRights07/05/18 12:35 AM
6

I must admit this has crossed my mind while seeing these articles. Although are there any offense level statistics with severity involved?
/r/MensRights27/04/18 12:41 PM
1

“What we don’t want to see is people falsely misleading the targets of domestic violence into saying look I’ve done this program – any problem now and it’s all on you,” she said. This isn't meant to attribute blame to an actual victim if that's the case. But considering what we know about domestic violence and the majority of it being reciprocal surely in the majority of cases this actually may be the case. Just because the man has been sent off to some anger management program but comes back to…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 11:33 AM
3

Isn't that the case 99% of the time?
/r/MensRights22/04/18 07:35 AM
2

How much of that 40% is also propped up by the ex-husbands? Depending on how the statistics are measured it very well could include divorced women "supporting themselves" and any child they have ignoring the fact that half of the money is still coming from the ex husband. Its an interesting statistic but not a perfect indicator of what is actually going on.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 04:31 AM
5

I would assume being a firearms instructor (who's never actually shot anyone) is all fun and games until there's a real human on the end of the barrel. Often simple fundamentals don't prepare you for the psychological aspects.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 04:26 AM
1

Discussing it is important on how they are impacting men’s rights around the world. If the post is about this then I genuinely have zero issue with it. I'm talking more about posts like this... https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8dr7e8/acronym_of_the_year/?utm_source=reddit-android Its one of the top posts at the moment. Is the post anti-feminist? Not inherently. Is the sign anti-mra? No. Is it pro Feminist? We can't tell. All it is is a cheap joke that doesn't belong in a sub aimed at…
/r/MensRights21/04/18 08:44 AM
0

I'm talking about articles where the title is basically "feminist does/says dumb shit (not realated to men)" usually some type of in fighting or hipocracy. Like sure they're dumb but a) it's just an individual doing dumb shit. Easily dismissed as NAFALT or "not a real feminist" Because b) Easily dismissed arguments don't do anything but preach to the choir and make everyone else roll their eyes with a "really?... That's what men have to complain about" look All just to "get one over" on feminism…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 07:29 PM
0

I can't prove a negative.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 07:12 PM
5

This is by far the clearest opposition to what I was trying to say. Thanks for reminding me about people that are at different points in their journey.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 07:10 PM
1

No... in the same way that black lives matter don't care about the KKK attacking jews or arguing over who has the "purest blood" nor should we get bogged down in laughing at every stupid thing a feminist does. If that were the case nothing else would ever happen.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 06:32 PM
2

DUDE!! Stop being so obtuse. I wouldn't care if every post was anti-feminist in nature. Just as long as it actually related in some way to this sub.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 06:26 PM
2

Do what the feminists do for once and check my history, just because there are a variety of people here who agree with me about wanting to keep this sub on topic which includes shitting on feminists doesn't mean they're my alts. I don't have enough time in the day. "It is easier to fool someone than convinced them they have been fooled" The irony being... You fooled yourself.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 06:08 PM
2

I am a regular poster... As regular as a normal person who has an irl life too
/r/MensRights20/04/18 05:59 PM
3

Dude just admit you're wrong and move on. You're fighting ghosts. Just because you've been using your Alts to double vote on your posts.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 05:49 PM
7

That wasn't me... Good try though
/r/MensRights20/04/18 05:43 PM
6

Nor do I think it's relevant in a sub that has nothing to do about race.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 05:42 PM
7

We hit r/all? Awesome. I don't go there. I post here fairly often though.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 05:39 PM
4

I don't disagree with you. I have no issue with language used here or the feelings expressed. Even if it was incel levels of language I wouldn't care. I'm just a bit ocd when there are posts that are basically all anti sjw (which I'm not against) and no men's rights unless there is some specific angle as to be relevant.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 05:31 PM
4

Please don't speak for me. That what happens to get me banned from every feminist sub out there. So kindly take my words at face value or kindly fuck off.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 05:26 PM
3

You stated it's a "minority" of feminists. Where did I say minority of Feminists? The majority of anti-feminism posts I actually believe belong here. You support anti-feminism, except when it's anti-feminist... got it. No I just support mindless posts about anti-feminism that aren't about men's rights in a men's rights sub.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 05:23 PM
7

Well... Actually... If you wouldn't mind. That'd be great. It would make my day so much easier.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 05:15 PM
3

I know noone cares what I want to see. But isn't that the point of having specific subs to post in? So we can choose what we want to see. I might be having a little bit of an OCD day but it just really irks me when things aren't related to the subs you're in.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 05:13 PM
3

Maybe you should spend more time browsing the page. I do. Maybe too much haha. I see the good posts I see the bad posts. But somedays when I see on my wall what I expect to be an sjwhate post I look up and see it's mensrights and think to myself... What does this have to do with mens rights? I'd prefer calling it "Expressing opinions that would get you flogged in real life". Often they're not... At least not the posts I'm talking about. Posts about how feminism prevents makes victims of DV getti…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 05:08 PM
7

every single time it's pointed out that the largest groups of feminists in the world are anti-equality, you don't respond. The reason I go away is because I'm not arguing against it. That's not the point I was ever trying to make. Your fighting a mighty impressive strawman there. Reread or at least read my actual post. I have nothing against anti-feminism in relation to men's rights. I even support it. What I don't support is posts in a men's rights sub when the article has absolutely nothing to…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 04:57 PM
15

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8dk3qh/feminists_attack_white_women_for_cultural/?utm_source=reddit-android This kind of post. Cultural appropriation has nothing to do with men's rights. Feminism just as a label has nothing to do with men's rights unless it's in direct conflict with it. Usually they don't get a lot of traction but occasionally one seems to make it up there. All it is, is pointing and laughing at stupidity. Sure that's funny. But does it belong here? My opinion is no…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 04:46 PM
13

Did I say that?
/r/MensRights20/04/18 04:38 PM
7

Ok I'll start posting recipe videos where the chefs a man... That's men's issues right? Don't be so intellectually dishonest.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 01:34 PM
28

There's tone policing and then there's staying in topic. If I were to be criticising how people expressed there views of women and generalisations along with some nawalt bullshit, sure you can accuse me of tone policing. But when I come to this sub I don't really want to see the latest drama of what one online feminist did to another online feminist. There are other subs for that.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 12:28 PM
9

The poster is telling men to remember not to rape. You wouldn't find this poster in a woman's bathroom because it's aimed at men. Its just as much good as telling women not to murder their babies. There are crazies out there and they're gonna do what they're going to do.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 10:59 AM
1

And they wonder why they garner such a bad reputation.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 09:12 AM
1

Which is annoying. I wouldn't consider anything I post to be too edgy. I'm not perfect but I try to be as intellectually honest as possible. They could tell that if they actually read my comments. The nuance gets lost however when you only read the sub title.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 08:10 AM
1

I'm actually close to reaching this point myself. Edit it's weird but I've actually been using Facebook more. Even though it's not anonymous, it's not a huge deal breaker for me.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 08:47 PM
1

This happened to me in menslib the other day. I was thoughtfully trying to explain my take on a topic they have gotten touchy over before. Someone checked my post history and immediately began strawmanning everything I said. Along with claiming I wasn't worth responding to. Then was banned for "not commenting in good faith" despite explaining every single thing I had either asserted or proved. The sheer self righteousness of them is actually unbelievable.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 08:44 PM
1

You mean left wing? This was menslib I was dealing with.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 04:29 PM
2

This is also a huge possibility. Considering how quick my discussion turned into having to deny things they just attributed to me then I could see that it's actually not as big an issue as they make it out to be. Although even as the fringyest of fringe movements it's an interesting discussion. My favourite line of menslib is trying to say gamergate is alt right "under the guise of ethics in journalism"... well if there's a legitimate reason you can't just dismiss an entire movement because you …
/r/MensRights13/04/18 11:37 AM
1

As I said this has very little to with individual choices and I'm in no way blaming women for men becoming Nazis. Or even that women should date Nazis to "moderate" them. Everyone should choose who they want to date I'm talking about the larger population level of causes and effects. I am blaming a culture not women. Many people have pointed to the rise of the alt right as a response to feminism going too far. Obviously the far left characterise it because "obviously men just want to oppress wom…
/r/MensRights13/04/18 05:48 AM
1

To me, depending on the severity of course, that immediately telling someone to leave a relationship shouldn't be the first go to solution. I have heard it suggested that treating it as a social problem is likely to have better outcomes.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 12:55 PM
2

It also showed men in abusive relationships are no more likely to leave than non-abusive ones.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 12:50 PM
5

I think this is the start of the evidence that of you build it they will come.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 12:07 PM
2

r/menkampf
/r/MensRights08/04/18 06:01 AM
18

He was just being a despicable man so obviously it's ok /s
/r/MensRights08/04/18 05:59 AM
5

I hope this is a poe. I don't need to lose any more faith in humanity
/r/PussyPass07/04/18 05:14 PM
68

HOOOOOO-LY SHHIIIT. I just googled it and it's a real question. I'm a fairly reasonable guy but if there was ever a reason to go MGTOW this would be it.
/r/PussyPass07/04/18 12:20 PM
20

That was exactly my opinion when I read this.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 03:49 PM
26

I believe so I think it's this one: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eaton_Township_Weis_Markets_shooting
/r/MensRights23/03/18 02:01 PM
143

Wasn't there a trans person who shot up their place of work? They also had a whole YouTube devoted to their ramblings.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 12:37 PM
1

You're right why anyone thought adding foreskin was a good idea was probably on some Chinese medicine power trip. But when it comes to the powerful industry that is cosmetics and the wealthy powerful women who can afford them it needs to be taken into account. Because let's face it human rights never really gets in the way of people with the money not to care about it
/r/MensRights22/03/18 01:49 PM
1

There are techniques where it's possible. By manipulating genes or adding telomerase. I'm not sure of the specifics but it is technically possible. Don't get me wrong I don't want to minimise wrong doing and I realize companies shouldn't be able to get away with that either I'm just trying to voice an idea that while not perfect at least considers everyone's interests so to limit any push back
/r/MensRights22/03/18 12:31 PM
29

I'm going to be more practical in response to this. The fact that circumcision happens is horrible. The fact that the beauty industry profit from it is even worse. But if the use of specifically cloned foreskin from past victims becomes more widespread, in the same way as growing vegan beef from cow harvested cow cells it removes the need for the industry to promote a barbaric practice.
/r/MensRights21/03/18 11:11 PM
2

Shakespeare was a man. Poetry is for everyone. Take that as you will from a science oriented guy who hasn't picked up a fictional book in years let alone read poetry. I liked it though. It resonates with me as a young man who goes to have children in the future
/r/MensRights21/03/18 10:47 AM
1

WHY ARE YOU YELLING?
/r/MensRights18/03/18 11:40 PM
1

This is a short term problem. The more we promote empathy and compassion towards men the better things will become. It's not an over night process
/r/MensRights15/03/18 06:35 PM
9

I understand where you're coming from but I feel like this mindset should be countered. I try as a rule not to fall into the same pitfalls as feminism. I have personally met girls who have not gone to the police because they did not think they would be believed, it infuriates me that they fell for the feminist bullshit. Obviously, there is real bias against men coming forward and it's a slightly different situation than what I just described, however the more men who come forward, the more it WI…
/r/MensRights14/03/18 11:59 PM
3

Exactly. I was on a date the other day who was going on about how 2 women are killed every day by domestic violence. It's not it's 2 a week, along with 1 man, but still horribly high. She genuinely said the number of men are nowhere near as high as women else "why aren't there any domestic violence shelters for men?" Safe to say if I didn't know this already I would still Google it. Also safe to say there wasn't a second date.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 02:40 PM
1

No that's fine. I've heard it too. I'm not saying one way or the other. If you're right then yes feminism is adding to the rape problem. Although ideologically I think it's part of what supports their idea of patriarchy, that men hate women and want to control them.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 08:38 AM
1

If you have a citation I'd love to read it. However my suspicion is it is feminist in nature and that power is actually not as important as it is made out to be. In the same way domestic violence isn't all about power and control. I'm not saying it's not a factor. Especially in cases such as war but considering most rapes occur between people who know each other I would hypothesize that it is about sexual urges just as much.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 07:56 AM
1

Brevity. It's probably a mistake to leave it out in this situation though
/r/MensRights10/03/18 03:57 PM
1

This is pretty much my point. I don't believe that rape is misogyny, but it's sure what I see posted everywhere else but feminist leaning friends.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 03:01 PM
2

See this is where the conflation and misunderstanding that I was scared of happens. I do not in anyway support legislation that would give harsher penalties simply based on the fact the victim is a woman. Or a man for that matter. I support harsher penalties if the crime can be proven to be motivated by sex. For me it would have to fall under the same due process of having to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the crime happened because of their gender. For example if a feminist protestor carryi…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 08:55 AM
1

BELSOC*
/r/MensRights09/03/18 04:52 PM
5

It's the tag for sarcasm. If you see it. It means that it is being said sarcastically. Edit: autocorrect
/r/MensRights28/02/18 09:46 PM
7

Note the "/s" buddy.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 08:39 PM
38

MEN ALREADY HAVE ALL THE RIGHTS. DONT YOU KNOW? /s
/r/MensRights28/02/18 07:29 PM
7

I think most the answers are troll answers tbh. Most of them consists of "me with cats". I don't think this is anything to worry about. It's like asking a Roosh V what his perfect woman is.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 12:32 PM
20

Reading the article it focuses on how being gay and specifically sodomy has been a crime. It then goes on to link that with sexual abuse of boys by men along with the male power structures of religion. There are however numerous more ways that don't require a penis to perpetrate sexual assault. They are using the definition that only a penis can rape and therefore ignoring (like usual) that women can be perpetrators. It's important because this article isn't really paradigm shifting. I know men …
/r/MensRights25/02/18 12:02 PM
107

It's a shame that the article only talks about male victims of male abusers. Not even a whisper that women can perpetrate sexual abuse.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 09:11 AM
3

The shooter literally grew up during the height of the 3rd wave. Schools are more feminist than ever and school shootings are at an all time high. I'm not saying correlation equals causation but...
/r/MensRights23/02/18 01:08 PM
7

Oh I absolutely understand the realism of the situation. I also support you initial points about making people in state go out and do something. That's why I somewhat had that reaction. The MRM are stereotyped as not doing anything and as silly as it is I feel like comments like that somewhat back their claims up. By saying it's hard just puts people off imo. I'm not saying it's easy and of course it's possible it will just be ignored but to me out of all the things this is a simple start. It's …
/r/MensRights20/02/18 04:20 PM
36

Can r/mensrights please get over over this pessimism. I know it's difficult, I know the odds are stacked against us but that's kind of why we exist right? I'm not in the state hell I'm not even in the country but I have family there but I think it's an issue that should have light brought to it.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 02:02 PM
19

https://www.ncga.state.nc.us/enactedlegislation/statutes/html/bysection/chapter_14/gs_14-33.html
/r/MensRights20/02/18 01:14 PM
1

Agreed
/r/MensRights20/02/18 06:28 AM
3

The scientific reason initial tests on pharmaceuticals are on men is one of fertility. If the compound messes with fertility men are for the most part only effected for that batch of sperm. So a max of a couple of months. Women have all their potential fertility from birth so any toxic effects are irreversible for life. This doesn't justify when other things go wrong. Just that it's a justification based on biology rather than "inherent gender value"
/r/MensRights17/02/18 06:52 AM
179

Hell just look at the recent Florida shooting. Front page is honouring the teacher who jumped in front of kids to save them. Somehow people conveniently forget about them when it comes to this war on men
/r/MensRights16/02/18 11:23 AM
8

What if they're just super nice to everyone? It's not as obvious as you think. Women are also often used to being treated nicely simply due to then being women outside of a flirting setting.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 03:24 PM
14

Women are just as flawed at flirting as guys. Guys will be super nice to a girl and never let on they're interested so it's similar to that. Their actions imply one thing while they mean something else. I think they think that they're giving off other signals that say otherwise. Or they want a "Man" who doesn't give up. It goes against what Feminists generally try to push but not all women are feminists.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 02:54 PM
20

Not a woman but "playing hard to get" isn't a phrase for no reason. DISCLAIMER: Obviously it doesn't apply to everyone. Edit: forgot to add the word "playing"
/r/MensRights12/02/18 02:42 PM
2

Deny or disprove to the best of your abilities. This will all depend on the accusation. I know someone who was stupid enough to accuse someone who was in hospital at the time. People could argue with me here but maybe point to the reason they made the accusation. Such as they were angry for some reason, or they are vying for your job.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 02:35 PM
1

Oh of course I don't disagree. I was including common assault. I'm no lawyer though so when a friendly touch becomes assault, common or otherwise is beyond me. I would assume violent intent or intent to disregard someone's wishes is something to do with it.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 04:31 PM
1

I'm sorry that happened. My ex did something similar. Needless to say why she's my ex.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 04:00 PM
1

I wasn't trying to say anything. I was just agreeing with the original comment. Everything I say was opinion or conjecture based on its content and the evidence provided. 1 in 20 sounds plausible but that wasnt a judgement of validity, it was a comparison to the 1 in 4 and how much lower that is to begin with. It could be lower but based on the evidence I can't tell.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 08:31 AM
1

I'm not arguing that the study is accurate. My point is that nowhere does it references "staring" Edit: inaccurate to accurate
/r/MensRights09/02/18 10:52 PM
-2

I'm sorry but that's just not true. The Mary Koss questions are... 1.Have you ever given in to sex play (fondling, kissing, or petting, but not intercourse) when you didn’t want to because you were overwhelmed by a man’s continual arguments and pressure? 2.Have you had sex play (fondling, kissing, or petting, but not intercourse) when you didn’t want to because a man used his position of authority (boss, teacher, camp counselor, supervisor) to make you? 3.Have you had sex play (fondling, kissing…
/r/MensRights09/02/18 10:35 PM
0

Cool your keyboard there warrior. This is in the context of meToo. The big thing about meToo was it was about the wider context of assault not just rape. I'm not trying to conflate a random arm touch with assault.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 09:56 PM
2

I'm pretty sure unwanted touching is pretty much the definition of assault. Be it sexual or not. She grabbed the guy's crotch... Both sexual and unwanted.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 08:54 PM
5

Even if it's 50 in a 1000 (5%) that's still nowhere close to 1 in 4. 1 in 20 sounds reasonable to me, especially if we are including unwanted touching.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 07:33 PM
1

She's a writer. It's literally her job to write stories.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 07:29 PM
1

She filed for the divorce.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 07:28 PM
6

Has anyone tried? I've never seen any research on this area. I doubt it would be difficult either. Maybe even a campaign focused to less red pilled men about its their duty to take care of themselves before they can take care of others.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 06:59 PM
9

I go back and forth on this one. I agree on a standard though. All in or all out. It avoids hit pieces like Aziz Ansari's story of frivolous accusations.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 06:52 PM
71

“I have zero recollection of engaging in inappropriate behavior and such behavior is inconsistent with my values.” Interesting not an out right denial. If women have no idea they are sexually assaulting men maybe they are the ones who need educating.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 12:46 PM
15

I agree with u/ThatNinaGal. Generally unless it's a public story, you have context to know whether or not to believe someone and if it's a public story it's really best to wait until their day in court and break the whole public reaction cycle. Also applying a general rule to an individual is always liable to rule someone in or out just because of the wider trend. That being said I wouldn't be surprised that ON AVERAGE women falsify rape more than men.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 12:25 PM
8

Oh of course. How silly of me.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/01/18 01:43 PM
15

Huh. I'd heard he'd been rejected once to which he replied "I have a problem" and left and another time where he asked the two ladies who just stayed and laughed. Whether or not they declined was never mentioned. One of Louis's quotes was something along the lines of " I didn't think it was wrong as I always asked"
/r/PussyPassDenied16/01/18 12:25 PM
60

Slightly off topic but wasn't the line about Louis CK a complete lie? From the accounts I heard he always asked.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/01/18 07:24 AM
6

Not so much misandry but an accurate description of male feminists. The same way that mocking feminists is not misogyny
/r/MensRights05/01/18 08:45 PM
9

No. Plain and simple. It's normal childish behaviour and a way for children to learn boundaries. The fact a 6 year old boy was expelled is ridiculous. Do you have a link?
/r/MensRights05/01/18 08:29 PM
4

This was obviously a piece before everything went to completely to shit. Something like this would never be allowed today. I became aware of the change around 2012 so maybe I'm just applying my own experience to it though.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 08:20 PM
1

She was already in the process of making a complaint. So she was obviously just looking for any excuse at this point. It would be interesting to know what the original complaint was about and see if that has anything to do with how she was treated.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 04:45 PM
1

Even before I discovered or joined the men's movement I knew I didn't want to get married. To begin with it was mostly about having a relationship based on loved and trust rather than the bureaucratic difficulty of a divorce. Now it's that plus all the extra injustices, despite understanding that marriage may make parental responsibility more difficult. Hopefully by the time it gets to that things will have changed.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 10:22 PM
3

Honestly I don't know with this specific case. I think I'd be uncomfortable with either. Considering that this specific post seems to be a direct statement on how it is appropriate to act. I fall very much in the "noone should be violent" camp. Obviously there's always exceptions and I'm not against self defense and context is key. The absurdity levels aren't high enough to avoid a Poe and the context isn't there to justify the violence.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 12:36 PM
1

We do have slander laws but I think the burden of proof is on the accuser unlike in the USA. My worry would be that because they're minors the case is technically confidential but obviously it's only confidential to the point that kids keep things confidential. I don't know how things these work. My friend isn't particularly well off so tbh staying out of the courts (and I know this sounds greedy) unless theres reasonable financial compensation is all they can really afford. Which for a case lik…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 07:32 AM
1

I'll have a look thanks, but aren't they more of a political party?
/r/MensRights18/12/17 10:35 PM
11

Of course not. It's entirely Duluth model based.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 01:38 PM
13

It's so depressing. I just had a look at refuge.org.uk and under the the tab "Support for women" there are 8 further sections, about staying safe, planning to leave, children, money and more. Brilliant the kind of support and advice you expect someone to receive. Under the tab "Support for men" there are a grand total of TWO further tabs. One titled "I am being abused" and the other titled "I am an abuser". Following the first link it leads to two paragraphs of generic text finished with a singl…
/r/MensRights09/12/17 12:47 PM
6

Jesus fucking Christ the spin on this article compared to the Edinburgh version is startling. https://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/our-region/edinburgh/edinburgh-woman-who-ripped-out-man-s-testicle-with-teeth-avoids-jail-1-4633430 Basically according to this article she was trying to have sex with him when he said no and they got into an argument. My guess is she started trying to blow him and she bit him.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 09:44 PM
3

My bad TIL
/r/MensRights04/12/17 01:19 PM
-1

Cattle* chattel implies there is an obligation to look after them.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 05:53 PM
3

This. I work as the only man in a department of 10 or so and there are only ever about 5 in the office at any one time. I totally understand why they do it and don't fault them to it but our entire department is behind as a result. You can either work full-time or you can work part time which results in earning less. Just don't complain about it.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 09:05 PM
5

This article assumes or at least wants you to assume that all domestic violence incidents that police are called to have the the same distribution of levels of violence regardless of gender. However the likelihood that neighbours will call the police when a woman is raising her voice Vs when a man is raising his voice is very likely to be different. So it's probably more likely that for the police to be called on a woman she has to be doing something pretty scary. The article also blatantly admi…
/r/MensRights25/11/17 06:07 PM
1

This is a perfect example of how certain people have completely no idea of other people's thoughts or feelings. The lack of empathy is genuinely worrying.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 03:25 PM
169

I'm absolutely happy for there to be deaths for the workers on the Quatar football stadium, That's a price I'M willing to pay/s She's not paying anything and potentially benefiting how can anyone think this is a reasonable thing to say.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 01:20 PM
4

I know this seems frustrating but this is more to protect the victim than it is to protect her. In cases where the victim is a living family member if the woman's name was to come out everyone knows who the son is. This isn't a double standard in this case.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 12:01 AM
1

My bad
/r/MensRights10/11/17 12:55 PM
2

It's funny how many actual male feminists you see that basically say the same thing. "I am a feminist and I am ashamed to be male"
/r/MensRights10/11/17 11:18 AM
2

Signed. I have no personal stake in this and grew up with a loving father but the idea that not everyone grows up with one and are sometimes kept from seeing them is heart breaking.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 09:26 AM
1

It also doesn't seem to based on any recent college campus rapes. Maybe I'm wrong and there are still police stations that act this way but given how college campuses are known to investigate things like this and to say she was completely dismissed seems to be pushing a false narrative.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 04:55 PM
3

I was somewhat annoyed by the glossing over of the rape kit. It's an issue that seems to misunderstood even now. Of course the rape kit isn't going to be tested. Noone is denying the sex happened. That's all the kits test for. They test for if sex occurred and if so, who the accused might be.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 04:45 PM
2

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiY9Z-rnfvWAhXIvBoKHZZeDs4QFgg6MAM&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Ffilm%2F2017%2Foct%2F11%2Factor-terry-crews-sexually-assaulted-by-hollywood-executive&usg=AOvVaw0RptH_wgbnd1VMx5OK7_1u You obviously haven't seen this
/r/MensRights18/10/17 10:34 PM
6

People deal with things differently, not feeling alone is certainly one way, especially the idea that "They survived it so I can too". Especially when an event is completely unseen (like sexual violence against men). Like all things it can be abused though and rather than a support network it can turn into a one-up-manship like is often seen in feminist circles.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 02:46 PM
1

Sorry for the weird reformatting. The original article is a mess of graphics. Here's the original article for convenience but I don't support giving them the clicks. http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/harvey-weinstein-facebook-me-too-sexual-assault-abuse-men-should-post-too-a8004631.html
/r/MensRights18/10/17 02:35 PM
4

"NO, you will sit down and eat this food I slaved all day cooking for you and DON'T FORGET TO TAKE YOUR SHOES OFF. I just vacuumed and I will not have you ruining my hard work. Aaaaaand would it kill you to change the toilet paper when you finish the roll. If you think we're doing that thing in bed you mentioned last week, you better buy me that gold watch I subtly sighed at last week."
/r/PussyPass15/10/17 11:37 PM
6

It was a joke.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 11:24 PM
2

Whatever makes you happy is the most important. I'm glad you've found your calling. Something I'm still looking for.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 09:36 PM
3

Whatever makes you happy is the most important. I'm glad you've found your calling. Something I'm still looking for.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 09:35 PM
10

I wasn't going for going for opposite but more of the worst spin i could out on those characteristics. I'm sure I could make it fit better
/r/MensRights10/10/17 09:32 PM
570

Alternative title "A new study shows how men are geared to determination while women are geared to codependency."
/r/MensRights10/10/17 06:35 PM
3

Is there something to be said for the idea that removing medical procedures on a grounds of religious grounds is in fact an attack on women. However the inequality towards men having no equivalent in either rights to walk away from an unwanted pregnancy and free contraception be it barrier methods, vasogel (when it's available) and vasectomies is the greatest inequality here? Maybe it's already being addressed somewhere else in the comments.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 06:31 PM
1

As prudent as her advice is in this day and age unfortunately is does nothing to counter the societal obligation of men to make all the decisions.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 04:04 PM
2

This has nothing to do with patriarchy. This has to do with a person in power. If a female exec was accused of similar behaviour and a feminist was saying Ashton Kutcher was only there because he slept with her I'd be saying the same thing. I didn't call anyone a victim and my point is I expressly object to implicating people and attributing all the success simply because they have had interactions. Watson and Lawrence haven't made any allegations as far as I know and that wouldn't be proof eith…
/r/MensRights09/10/17 10:54 PM
1

The difference is a level of consent for one. It's the difference between coercion and a quid pro quo transaction. One makes you a prostitute the other makes you a rapist. You decide which is worse.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 02:55 PM
13

This is a very strong point indeed. It's all to easy to be drawn into the idea that "It sucks for everyone so it's ok" mentality. I know this is more of an egalitarian point of view but building empathy for everyone equally should be our goal. This being said I'm not trying to start a discussion about empathy gaps. I'm just being idealistic.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 10:39 AM
9

Why is this being downvoted?
/r/MensRights09/10/17 10:32 AM
12

Your title is complete conjecture. It makes the whole sub look completely petty and misguided. Emma Watson for one has a platform from being a multimillionaire child actress. It is unlikely she has any platform thanks to him. Yes she uses her femininity in a other areas to promote her feminism but this isn't that issue. I can't speak for Jennifer Lawrence. I think we should make a clear distinction between women using sexual power to get ahead and people in power who use that power to coerce sex…
/r/MensRights09/10/17 10:27 AM
1

This is why you can cover a men's issue and still be called biased http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3311681/Outrage-social-media-BBC-documentary-makes-excuses-female-violence-blaming-alcohol-low-self-esteem-bad-behaviour.html
/r/MensRights09/10/17 08:17 AM
1

What you have to remember is when the BBC cover issues like this is most people here don't trust them to do it fairly. Starting with the title of "The rise of female violence" is inherently leading the viewer to assume this is a new thing. A subsection of women have always been violent. It's these little ways that even while covering something they wouldn't usually do they still misrepresent and slant a viewers bias in one way or another. Also the BBC are supposed to be unbiased and are not supp…
/r/MensRights09/10/17 08:12 AM
2

Agreed as awful as this situation is the clinic was the subject of fraud. The mother should be held 100% accountable. I think a stint I prison would show her and others that fraud is a serious crime. Especially as he's unlikely to receive any money from her.
/r/MensRights06/10/17 12:07 PM
10

How has someone like this managed to get this far whereas I haven't heard of a single case of a man running under the banner of father's rights? Is this simply just being over blown as it gained traction here on reddit and won't have any real world impact?
/r/MensRights27/09/17 08:14 PM
4

Just put it up again. Silent protest but not a passive protest
/r/MensRights27/09/17 07:43 PM
13

I'm interested in why more men in america haven't tried to run on similar platforms? Surely some wealthy lawyers have been screwed over enough to change things. I know Mike Buchanan in the UK has started his own political party and Phillip Davies of the Conservatives speaks on men's issues but are there any people in the US in political positions that are working on men's issues? I ask this from a point of ignorance rather than a criticism. Why has this woman appeared from nowhere with a such a …
/r/MensRights27/09/17 07:35 PM
4

Here are some links to the events in London if anyone was interested. https://j4mb.org.uk/2017/09/15/a-march-for-men-messages-for-men-international-mens-day-19-november/ https://marchformen.wordpress.com/mens-march/ https://marchformen.wordpress.com/messages-for-men/
/r/MensRights19/09/17 02:35 PM
1

Her career is dead. Noone will touch her.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 09:52 PM
2

I do admit they both look correlated I just picked out 2004 as the female spike seemed to match the male spike in size compared to pre 2000s. I did a quick Google and the best answer I could find is that it was perhaps due in part to the blackbox warning put on antidepressants around that time that led to a drop in the number of prescriptions given and that potentially having an impact. The war is also mentioned along with the growth of social media. So in short all those MySpace emos were tryin…
/r/MensRights17/09/17 09:52 PM
5

I remember watching the last episode. So many feels man.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 08:34 PM
10

What caused the parallel spike in 2004? The women's and the men seem mostly unconnected or at least a lot lower amplitude apart from 2004 and the latest spike.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 08:23 PM
5

I think I see what OP is saying here though. He's pointing out the hypocrisy of how the BBC are producing a show where mostly women are the focus, while shutting down panels that happen to have all men. Even when mock the week does have women on occasionally. They're basically two sides of the same coin. I'm fine with both or neither, but making an active effort to force diversity in the group containing all men while promoting a mostly female show seems wrong to me.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 06:50 AM
2

There's a lot of pessimism here but hey it can't hurt can it. If someone is willing to pay for it and understand that the level of effect is probably a magnitude less than you'd expect but I'd open it up to more than just feminists and target more general public such as young families more acutely. But personally I'm certainly much​ more likely to watch a free dvd over most junk mail
/r/MensRights12/08/17 08:31 PM
1

Just because a state is at will if you have an employment contract that trumps the existing at will clauses. Given how Google are big on the whole comfort and security of their employees I wouldn't be surprised if he has a contract.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 12:11 PM
1

As a Brit I'm unfamiliar. Do tell.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 09:13 PM
4

I am absolutely sick of articles like this saying that he is saying women are "biologically unsuitable" NO THE WORD YOU ARE LOOKING FOR IS.... "UNINTERESTED!!!!" I am not a beauty salon owner not because I am unsuitable but because I have absolutely zero interest in doing people's nails. It makes me rage so much
/r/MensRights08/08/17 01:04 PM
16

That doesn't seem to be the claim here. Her claim is that she was too drunk to consent. However considering she is obviously the aggressor all the way to the room there is very little way to deny he at least had reasonable affirmative consent. She doesn't look paraletic black out drunk. He doesn't look to be taking advantage, and if he was also drinking then what makes him more accountable for this situation.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 12:39 PM
1

Here was an interesting article on this that people might find useful. http://www.datagoneodd.com/blog/2015/01/25/how-to-lie-and-mislead-with-rape-statistics-part-1/
/r/MensRights06/08/17 02:58 AM
1

Unfortunately drug development is painfully slow. Usually when you hear about a new drug it's only been tested in animals and sometimes not even that. There are still years of phase 1 through phase 3 to pass before general release. If it makes it that far. It hasn't been developed before mainly due to money. Why create something when the other half already are sorting it. Along with any political suppression. Now that there is a clear change in attitudes and a clear desire from men for their own…
/r/MensRights06/08/17 02:44 AM
2

Definitely an interesting hypothesis and one I'll definitely keep in mind. Although correlation does not equal causation. I would argue that it's the reduction of religion, religious and right wing attitudes has also had a reasonable impact (not a judgement just a statement). Considering that before the invention of the contraceptive pill people were forced into marriage by family pressure if an accidental pregnancy happened. Not so much today. You could argue that without contraception this soc…
/r/MensRights25/07/17 11:50 AM
1

Birth control isn't cost effective? Citation please. Considering it helps prevents things like single mother households I am hard pressed to believe this.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 09:26 AM
1

Came here to say this. Also can we not go down the road of identity politics? I am definitely seeing this sub turn into petty squabbles. Men have problems Women have problems Let's focus on men's issues rather than circle jerking
/r/MensRights25/07/17 09:19 AM
1

I think it is important to establish whether claims are real or not. Obviously if they are false then it's easy to quash these kind of claims and stop the narrative. If it's true then it's important to show that it's not an atmosphere but rather corrupt individuals.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 08:41 PM
1

If you read his it starts off by saying his post was removed. So... still shitting but just differently.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 11:50 PM
1

Water is still wet, says new study!
/r/MensRights15/07/17 11:05 PM
2

Doesn't that give grounds for wrongful dismissal or something? I understand that the system is fucked. I'm just curious.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 11:35 PM
5

He's not fabulous. Just British
/r/MensRights13/07/17 11:31 PM
3

This is probably naive of me as someone outside the USA but is there a way of circumventing title ix precedings and just asking to be investigated by the police?
/r/MensRights13/07/17 11:14 PM
1

Technically I disagree but I at this point it all comes down semantics and the specific law you'd be breaking. However that does have specific real world a effects on sentences. In your theft analogy yes that might be the case but in a car accident, the difference between homicide, reckless driving, or a freak accident even if the action of hitting someone is the same. So it depends how this specific law is treated.
/r/MensRights11/07/17 07:53 AM
1

I think what u/indurdenwetrust is referring to is statutory rape. Which is understandable. However I think this whole topic is highly charged considering the variance in age of consent throughout the world and even states. Many men's rights activists worry about the "lucky kid, wish I was him" narrative which is indeed a valid issue although I disagree with the tenacity some defend this point. Given teens often have sex with eachother and some teen girls pursue older men its reasonable to assume…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 05:20 PM
3

That's the whole point here. Is it rape if they don't know the age. As in the words of Karen Straughn a criminal act has to have criminal intent or criminal negligence. That's the standard they need to prove.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:36 PM
-3

I expect I'll be down voted to hell but as it states in the article it is all on a case by case basis. If the argument here is a man would be treated more harshly I'd like to see a similar case. If there has not ever been a case where a man was reasonably justified when he did not ask someone's age I think this stands. Otherwise I don't see this type of post helping because it's basically conjecture. Other provable or statistically significant legal precedents I can get behind but I think this t…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 11:59 AM
0

I think he's a right wing anti choice troll.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 02:13 PM
3

Its been a while since I've read it but I guess the moral in a round about way is that while yes there are insane people, even normal people can seem insane or psychopathic if you're only looking at people's extreme qualities, and mental institutions love to hold onto those bits. He covers a cases where a researcher faked madness as a test and then had to be backed up by his other researchers in order to let him out. He then said he would send more researchers and they would have to spot them. T…
/r/MensRights07/07/17 07:29 AM
2

Did she just imply being a man is a red flag for being a rapist?
/r/MensRights06/07/17 11:13 PM
15

I suggest you read "The psychopath test" it's a great book and covers this very well.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 10:59 PM
1

I've come to the conclusion that staunch feminists just don't listen. I showed my mum the other day the graphic of the food bank disparity and she didn't even flinch at the male figure but immediately locked onto the single mother's figure and how it's probably lower because mothers might not be able to get to the food bank if they don't have cars. As awful as anyone having to rely on food banks single mothers are still the most subsidised even under a conservative government.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 07:09 AM
1

I agree with the others that you should see this through. By the sounds of it they know they can't win and will continue to lower their plea deal and pressure you to take it. There are too many computer logs nowadays to not support the truth be it your computer, her computer or YouTube servers. Screenshots aren't evidence beyond a reasonable doubt as you've shown how easy they are to fabricate. So the only evidence that can stick is computer logs. I don't know your circumstances but you sound li…
/r/MensRights03/07/17 10:11 PM
3

I totally get that but many people are not suitable to be parents but still are. Considering the adoption process is meant to involve vetting specifically responsible adults to look after specifically vulnerable children there is a higher standard for adoptive parents. This isn't to take away from incestuous families but my comment was specific to this case. It is probably more difficult if the child is biological considering that no charges were brought, however considering the that the case in…
/r/MensRights29/06/17 05:43 PM
6

The fact she has adopted kids of her own is also deeply troubling. I hope that despite not receiving charges that this permanently effects her ability to continue.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 04:05 PM
2

As someone who supports gun rights I am still uneasy at this article. Considering doctors notes are confidential they are legally obliged to protect that information. Also assuming all doctors are against guns is a bit presumptuous, I've met plenty who are pro-gun. Men's mental health is a sorely under supported topic and preventing physicians from talking about it won't help the problem. Considering just broaching the subject can reduce the likelihood of suicide.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 10:16 PM
2

I think it's just a difference of opinion. There are about an equal number of articles about discrimination to just discussion threads as in the feminism subreddit. However your opinion on their validity might lead you to believe them as whining. Men's rights is also a bigger subreddit which doesn't silence people for the most part so the diversity of topics will naturally be bigger.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 06:59 PM
1

After all the socialisation of only telling boys not to victimise others. I wonder even if we began telling girls not to victimise others whether it would have any impact at all. Edit: spelling
/r/MensRights22/06/17 06:39 PM
1

Thank you
/r/MensRights21/06/17 05:12 PM
1

Yeah it was. I applied there too.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 06:01 AM
1

While I agree doing it in store is preferable. Pretty much nowhere accept in store applications nowadays as it's all done online. HOWEVER I CALLED THEIR BLUFF AND HAVE BEEN SHORT LISTED. I guess that's all I can ask for.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 08:58 PM
5

I'm wondering if careful wording is at play here. Does saying looking for female applications legally not exclude men from applying compared to saying "Women only position"
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:54 PM
1

This is using the app "Job Today" it's set up so that they have to give you a reply in 24hrs. It's their gimmick.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:29 PM
1

Let's do the old switcheroo on this one as it's something to pass the time. If someone wants to illustrate my satire please feel free. 32 Types of Feminists 1 The molehill grower "The 6'4" man next to me spread his legs slightly. THIS IS WHY WE NEED FEMINISM!" 2 The Economist "Everyone must earn the same otherwise it is proof that society is sexist and racist" 3 The Abortionphile - "I've never had an abortion, But I wish I had" 4 The Comedienne "I sexually assaulted my boy friend but I'm a slut …
/r/MensRights20/06/17 02:09 AM
1

As a figure I think that military deaths are an important part to acknowledge. A way of giving respect to men and showing their true sacrifice. However is there any consensus on what the number should become. Is it reasonable to ask for 50/50 because as far as the people I've talked and listened to that would require more deaths overall due to the lower combat effectiveness of adding women into combat roles.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 05:31 PM
11

Listening to the radio cast and she complains about women in the army being given combat roles "against their will." It's not like they didn't have the will to join the army in first place and it's no different from the choices men are given.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 04:18 PM
3

Have girls ever stopped to wonder if they are bad in bed? Or if they have anything interesting to talk about? My most common complaint about dating is that girls generally want men to take the lead, to the point of completely not participating. Hence why guys end up just asking questions or talking about themselves. The reason is women don't talk. Or they provide a brief answer, which wasn't really the point of the question and kill any conversation that there may have been.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 07:24 PM
1

I'm aware that not everything is equal and that's fine it probably won't have a big gendered effect as some men are better than women and some women are better than men. In fact if it then shows that women earn less because they are coming from lower qualified backgrounds then doesn't that then indicate hiring bias towards women. I do have a problem with the "better negotiating skills" part. Considering negotiating is generally not about skill but knowledge. If you know others in the same field …
/r/MensRights03/04/17 11:14 AM
3

Honestly this legislation doesn't concern me. I'm personally fine with companies posting the earnings of its employees. If there is a discrepancy that isn't to do with part time work then it should be corrected. If more likely there isn't then it will be a nice middle finger to this feminist rhetoric and we can finally put this subject to rest. Of course the data should include hours worked and not just base salary.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 05:04 PM
1

They use the term Glass basement in The Red Pill movie
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:05 AM
5

To this day i still don't know. I had made a couple comments in one day. I then messaged the mods to ask specifically what it was and was threatened with a permanent ban from all of reddit so i just dropped it.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 12:12 AM
1

I understand this would be somewhat effective. Probably not as effective as you'd think as society has an issue seeing male victims. Also morally stooping to that low of a standard when it is obviously the opposite of what most of us want only helps justify the other side rather than letting cooler heads prevail. Let's make it clear I don't advocate for the unwanted grabbing of asses though.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 11:40 PM
20

“If there was an honest gentleman who approached a woman and asked to buy her a drink and she looked comfortable, none of the bar staff would have a problem with that.” So in The words of Casually Explained "to ensure you're being romantic instead of creepy is to be above a 7."
/r/MensRights23/02/17 04:04 PM
1

When I see stats like this, it's hard to know if 80% of men are shitty or if 80% of women are shitty.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 10:01 AM
1

The reason they don't use the word rape in the article is because she wasn't charged with it but it sickens me she wasn't even charged with sexual assault. Any woman in this situation would have been encouraged to file rape charges on top of the grievous bodily harm.... And really just GBH for that? When one fight in a pub can land you the same trouble as months of abuse, rape and torture it sickens me.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 06:38 AM
1

Even attractive guys aren't immune. Depending on how they choose to present they can be dismissed as douche bags and creeps. I don't fall into that category so this isn't a matter of projection either.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 04:08 AM
17

Not that I don't understand what you are doing is important work but from an art point of view how about trying making the Silhouettes yourself using some basic photo editing to add even more of a personal flare. Turn the photo black and white and then up the contrast. Find some friends to model. Gives you a reasonable banksy style image... Print and cut out to a stencil. But again good job.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 03:43 AM
2

No they're quite comparable. Waking up drunkenly to find someone on top of them. In the two cases the girl had help and her friends threw the guy out. The guy on the other hand was not so lucky.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 08:11 AM
2

Thanks for reminding us that rape is only something men can do and pretty much negates women from being able to do it.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 12:34 AM
3

Not the situation at all. But thanks for perpetuating this mindset. I already don't offer lifts to people because I know full well most will turn me down. I know some of my female friends have been assaulted. I also know some male friends who have been assaulted. The issue i feel comes from how they then deal with it. My female friends seem to have just blamed an entire sex while my male friends just blame the situation and the person involved. Which seems more sensible?
/r/MensRights03/10/16 12:31 AM
3

I think solely associating bad things with men would be a start. I remember one of the biggest case growing up was the Soham murders that were perpetrated by a couple that showed to me at least that it could be anyone. Saying don't let MEN touch you has always been somewhat antagonistic.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 07:45 PM
4

Following the advice of a serial killer. What could possibly go wrong? /S In that case we should just all be scared of everyone. It's at least egalitarian. Which I also refuse to do.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 04:41 AM
3

As much as this feels to be the case I think trashing this generation isn't the answer. There surely is a way to bridge the rift that keeps forming.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 04:30 AM
5

Well that's the problem. Standing up to it incites the yelling and tears. It's a lose lose at this point.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 04:11 AM
1

I'm sorry but even if this is real I don't see it as bullying. I know the consensus here is based around consent not having to be verbal but it's also good to learn that if someone you like really doesn't like you to move on. Maybe it's the "too young part" that most take offense to or maybe something else. It just doesn't seem like a big deal
/r/MensRights21/09/16 04:02 PM
2

Is it just me or is this just a sad glimpse at her husband's life. One where he seeks solice in his car. Where he's obviously given up arguing about whether to keep food or not, or ashamed that he didn't throw out something obviously sentimental to him. Maybe he did buy those chocolates for himself just so he felt better. Or maybe he intended them for her but just said fuck it. I think it is an interesting commentary on life that she doesn't feel the need to hide her eccentricities but he obviou…
/r/MensRights21/09/16 03:23 AM
-1

I think the course creator should be more interesting in taking English lessons.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 08:54 AM
40

I hope they also intend to cancel his women in literature class too.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 01:32 AM
2

Is there any relevancy to looking at distribution of sentencing? Is there a way to prove that despite both maximum sentences being the same that one is judged more harshly than the other?
/r/MensRights11/05/16 11:41 PM
1

OK thanks for clarifying all this. I admit the laws and the links in the petition are somewhat confusing.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 07:48 PM
18

"The sentences available under the Act for all sexual offences are significant and reflect the seriousness of the offending" Basically implying that female rape is less serious. Maximum punishment for rape = life in prison Maximum punishment for sexual assault = 10 years.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 04:31 AM
16

This is why I don't post on Facebook. Despite regularly seeing my female friends post feminist rhetoric on a daily basis.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 01:35 AM
3

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/124524
/r/MensRights20/04/16 11:48 PM
2

Why did this woman only get 3 years when the other got close to 8? One was even under the legal age of consent.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 06:25 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter