TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

QUAN-FUSION Archive

View 1 posts and 63 comments by QUAN-FUSION on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
75

DiscriminationQUAN-FUSION/r/MensRights27/11/17 01:35 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
40

r/whiteknights
/r/MensRights15/04/19 10:39 AM
1

I found this on r/cringe
/r/MensRights03/03/19 01:06 AM
0

Translation: sit on the sidelines in the hopes that one day she changes her mind
/r/seduction17/02/19 08:31 PM
29

Be civil. In a thread about telling someone they are an asshole and why... Oh the irony
/r/MensRights15/02/19 07:24 AM
1

Are you really advocating slut shaming as a reasonable response to these issues you mentioned? What is your actual argument? Safe sex existing doesn't mean everyone is automatically engaging in it. Wtf It's still a choice, like anything else. That's just as bad as assuming that every woman who engages with multiple sexual partners is automatically suffering from something on your list? How can you not see how this type of stereotyping isn't fair? Btw I never once said it was all mens fault. I sa…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 03:58 PM
0

Lemme know when cynicism makes any changes in the world
/r/MensRights05/02/19 01:25 PM
1

Ok for one, in modern society, safe sex is extremely accessible. Which negates your entire argument. Are you suggesting that more partners means less safe sex? While entirely possible, it's not like it's the norm. Having sex 100 times with one man or having sex with 100 men is no different if you do it safely. And please, don't hide your possessiveness behind some misplaced worry for community spending. That's ridiculous. Further more, are men not also susceptible to some of these outcomes? Do t…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 01:18 PM
1

My point with tape and homosexuality was to play into your 'biology' argument. You are saying that over the course of our evolution - that we haven't changed, or that change is impossible. I'm saying, cavemen would rape who ever they felt like because 1. They could and wanted too, 2. There wasn't any kind of society. Now, with education it is frowned upon. Same with homosexuality, straight males tend to have issue with it, but society has changed and so have the negative perceptions that surroun…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 12:45 PM
-1

More so the other way around. Men's heights wasn't the issue I was really discussing, it was a passing comparison in the hypocritical nature from both sides. But I would say men who expect women not to care about height should also not care about a woman's previous sexual history. I understand that one is a choice and the other isn't etc, but there is no valid reason for a man to have an issue with that. It's just a pride issue. Which can be changed.. over time.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 08:21 AM
-1

Oh so all those millionaire cavemen were rolling in pussy? You know in times of financial crisis, women are more likely to preference men that are financially stable over physically better looking males. Shit changes when priorities shift. And that can happen with proper discourse. Now, I understand males can be possessive. But logically it serves no purpose. Early man used to just take the women we wanted. After time, society has conditioned us to know that this is wrong, despite our instincts.…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 08:01 AM
1

That's irrelevant and beside the point. I understand that one is a choice and that the other isn't. The POINT is that while people can have preferences, there's a negative stigma around these traits that really has no place in modern society. It's just really old-fashioned and we should be more progressive. Can you give me a valid reason why a woman should be shamed for her sexual exploits over a man?
/r/MensRights05/02/19 07:55 AM
-6

You are totally missing the point... The idea is to reverse and rewrite this stigma. a woman who has had more partners is really no different to a woman who hasn't at all. It's just the male ego+societal standards that take issue. Slut shaming and height prejudice both shouldn't exist. I understand that they do, but as I said, the idea is to change this harmful and unproductive mindset
/r/MensRights05/02/19 01:12 AM
1

Pretty sure this is bumble, where the woman must message first.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 09:59 PM
34

Could you imagine a man creating a tampon ad telling women to stop being crazy bitches?
/r/MensRights26/01/19 04:20 AM
24

Can this be a meme please
/r/MensRights26/01/19 04:16 AM
2

And calling out condescending know-it-alls amuses me. And this has nothing to do with me. I didn't put myself up for criticism. At least my presumptions are based on information. Yours are just desperate reaching comebacks. You're a 21 yr old fucking fat chicks and you're preaching??? Get real man.
/r/seduction23/01/19 01:19 AM
2

Pretty hypocritical. After all, you're the one spending your time writing lengthy condescending/bullshit posts across Reddit. At least I can afford to pay for my dates though haha The fat chick thing was a total guess based on the fact you look like a foot. I presumed you must be a chiselled chad if any of this were to be true. But your appearance ( from a previous post ) is extremely average to put it politely so I doubt you are pulling anything other than ugly/fat chicks Not to mention being p…
/r/seduction22/01/19 09:31 PM
-1

Just look through his post history and you can tell this kid is full of shit. So you're 21? Who cares if you're broke? And there's a thing called standards. Any one can pull a fat chick.
/r/seduction22/01/19 05:53 PM
1

It's one thing to tell people to be confident, it's another to tell them how to do it And really, if you are just pretending to be confident, that may get you a one night stand, but not a relationship.
/r/seduction08/01/19 07:34 AM
2

To summarise. Be a chad. So insightful..
/r/seduction08/01/19 04:42 AM
3

Female MRA contributing to this sub
/r/MensRights04/12/18 09:41 AM
3

This is extremely refreshing to see
/r/MensRights04/12/18 09:39 AM
1

Easier to say you're gay. What they gonna do? Make u suck a dick?
/r/MensRights29/11/18 02:09 PM
1

It's actually safer to do it as a child. Not condoning it at all though
/r/MensRights26/11/18 03:24 AM
2

men*=money bags
/r/MensRights12/11/18 10:15 AM
2

I see you're a transvestite. That explains your trouble comprehending either side of this argument.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 08:52 AM
2

Nice comeback man 😂
/r/MensRights09/11/18 08:49 AM
2

What the fuck are you smoking? OP CLEARLY SAID 'THE OTHERSIDE OF TOXIC MASCULINITY' I never even remotely implied that all men are toxic??? How about you sit the fuck down and work on your comprehension skills. Edit: you edited your original post!! What an absolute coward.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 08:46 AM
6

Everyone is capable of it. It's another thing to actually do it. And when it's directly involved in your line of daily work, it's hardly the same as a civilian laying their life down.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 08:42 AM
2

Well for one. It's gross to call their heroics insensible. Have some respect. The issue is society has conditioned everyone to expect this behaviour. From emergencies where it's 'women and children first' to movies where men are always protecting the damsel in distress. A man who doesn't protect a woman in this situation is almost guaranteed to be humiliated for it too.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 08:40 AM
4

You're missing the point entirely... No one said this is toxic masculinity. Or that feminism caused the shooting.. what the fuck are you on about? How could you misconstrue this so badly? They are saying that men are decried for being toxic yet they are still willing to do this and what's worse is that women expect it and everyone has been conditioned to think that men's lives are less valuable. A women would never take a bullet for a man. Ever.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 05:24 AM
11

It's true isn't it?
/r/MensRights09/11/18 05:20 AM
3

Fuck off, no ones upset about this, they are just acknowledging the hypocrisy in a sarcastic fashion
/r/MensRights03/10/18 02:22 AM
1

Exactly, good luck my dude
/r/seduction14/09/18 04:38 AM
1

sure, there are women who are less concerned with material things. They're just much harder to come across. And I feel like you are sick of playing the waiting game. Not needing to provide proof doesn't mean you're still not faking it. I would say there is nothing wrong with slightly embellishing already existing attributes to get your foot in the door, so to speak. I think the overlying point we are getting to is that most women are materialistic/ concerned with 'status'. It sucks, and there do…
/r/seduction14/09/18 04:35 AM
1

I never said you should fake it till ya make it That was your idea. I just said it would probably work. But I presumed if you are willing to go to those lengths with no moral repercussion, then paying for it wouldn't be out of the question for you either. And much easier. Save yourself the effort of fabricating a false persona. I'm not even judging you. There's nothing wrong with paying for it. It's legal where I live.
/r/seduction14/09/18 03:40 AM
2

Take that money you'd spent on a date and get yourself a hooker Least then you get a guarantee at getting your dick wet.
/r/seduction13/09/18 06:11 AM
2

It would absolutely work for a one night stand, but you won't be getting a relationship, you'll be exposed quickly enough. There's also the question of ethics, but that's up to you man. I do sympathise with why you feel the need to do this but I can't condone it.
/r/seduction12/09/18 05:16 AM
1

Yup, 100% right man. And its refreshing to see this issue discussed in the open for once. It usually seems like if you even bring the topic up you are labeled a 'neck beard' or 'misogynist' or whatever other negative stereotype they can come up with to condemn anyone who dares speak up about how difficult it can be for males. Women are conditioned to go for the 'cream of the crop', despite how unrealistic it may be for that particular individual. I do believe this is much more apparent in the we…
/r/seduction12/09/18 04:51 AM
1

Nice, I really wanna visit the states sometime. Yeh you should do it man, seriously. I did it at 27 and all I could think about was that I wish I had come earlier. It's a much better lifestyle there, it's people before work, we're meant to enjoy our life's not constantly be stressed and overworked.
/r/seduction12/09/18 04:22 AM
2

Hahaha it's overrated tbh.. it's expensive. women are pretty prudish too. Nice weather and scenery though I guess. Where u from?
/r/seduction12/09/18 04:00 AM
1

Do it, I've legit been contemplating it. Not just for women, but it is a big part of it. East Europe is affordable. I wanna go back to Prague. The cost of living is 40% cheaper than where I live ( Sydney ) so I wanna save and then essentially double my savings. A normal western looking man would do extremely well with women there.
/r/seduction12/09/18 03:50 AM
2

Women can afford to be more picky. It's a damn meat market for them while we are the display items waiting to be picked. The more appealing you make your 'brand' the higher chance you have. It sucks but it's the reality of western life. I say western because in Europe, women being more promiscuous is culturally accepted and not looked down upon. I feel men and women are much more equals there and I think a big part of it comes down to the naked human body being celebrated there, in paintings, sc…
/r/seduction12/09/18 03:26 AM
4

I haven't experienced any issues being uncircumcised. ( and the only two issues mentioned are Infection of the penis and a condition called phimosis ) And did you even read the link?? Coz I did and it doesn't exactly help your stance. "the benefits are not great enough to recommend universal newborn circumcision. " And the only benefits were precautions against possible issues. Nothing even directly beneficial. I could chop the top of your finger off and you'd get over it right? Furthermore, it …
/r/MensRights07/09/18 03:04 PM
5

Because it's completely unnecessary outside of rare and unpredictable medical conditions like your friends.. And as the other dude said, it still fucking hurts the baby, they just can't vocalise it.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 02:37 PM
31

It should be illegal and because it isn't I'd say that qualifies as government control of male bodies
/r/MensRights07/09/18 03:09 AM
1

Ketamine is horse tranquilizer but it's used as a party drug
/r/MensRights09/08/18 04:07 AM
5

Some people need a reality check. For example. You can't keep verbally harassing someone and not expect them to snap one day and lash out.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 10:27 PM
2

Dude writes a novel on cooking pasta..
/r/seduction02/06/18 04:47 AM
0

I just don't feel the need to be someone I'm not just to get a fuck for the night. I'm not that desperate, but I imagine some people here are. I think women are so used to having a plethora of males to choose from that they really don't have to put in the effort because it's not hard for them to find a guy thirsty enough to do whatever she wants. Men are our own worst enemy when it comes to having any sort of self respect and not having to bend over backwards in the hopes of getting laid. To be …
/r/seduction08/05/18 09:29 AM
0

Agreed, this is what I do. Not necessarily extroverted, but confident and not into the traditional dynamic.
/r/seduction08/05/18 05:06 AM
0

You just contradicted yourself. First you say I don't have to keep them entertained then you say I should be trying to win her over? So which is it? And for the record, I have a reasonable success rate with women, it's just I've been on plenty of dates too where it felt like I had to make all the effort. And while it's easy to claim ' they don't want to talk to me' ( even though they have been texting me non-stop all week ) I think it's either that they are nervous too, or have been conditioned …
/r/seduction08/05/18 05:02 AM
1

That's some really generic advice. I don't have a problem keeping conversation going or coming up with ideas for activities. I just don't think it should always be on me to keep things flowing. It's a 2-way street.
/r/seduction07/05/18 08:25 PM
1

God forbid the woman could actually continue the conversation. Why is it always on us males to provide the entertainment?? It's gets tiring to always be the one coming up with ideas.
/r/seduction07/05/18 08:13 PM
6

Yeh nice comeback dickhole. You're weak as piss and when you can't defend your idiotic point you resort to shifting the attention to a non existent complaint. Crawl back to the sewer you came from.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 08:06 AM
8

Ok, if I can throw your own deluded logic back at you for a second... Are you really saying that no accomplishment of any man can be noted during this time because women were oppressed? Edit: looking at your history you're just a controversial asshole who actively looks for arbitrary reasons to be offended so you have something to do with your time. Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 07:55 AM
12

Omfg. Are you fucking thick or just selectively an asshole? I AM NOTING AN ACCOMPLISHMENT OF MEN. YES, A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR TO THIS COMING TO BE IS DUE TO THE EXPECTATIONS OF THE TIME. Those men worked incredibly hard, in terrible conditions and for long hours and that deserves to be recognised. what I am trying to say is exactly what I am saying. You can stop trying to twist my words to suit your agenda now It's as if I were to mention the achievements of African-Americans and you were to impl…
/r/MensRights10/02/18 07:26 AM
14

You can take your presumptuous high and mighty bullshit elsewhere because you know exactly what I mean. In the times these skyscrapers were constructed it was men who were the massive majority of the work force. And it's partly due to the expected gender roles of the time. I'm not implying it is the fault of women. Just noting the truth of the time. Again, one can note the achievements of men without a condescending dickhead like you trying to take intended offence from it.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 07:07 AM
15

It's essentially true. Did women build these buildings? That's not the point this is highlighting though. It's a promotion of the achievements of men, not a put-down of women. It's just an observation of truth.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 05:18 AM
7

You're taking it way too literally... He is using 'man up' as a general phrase that encompasses all those things you mentioned,
/r/MensRights14/12/17 03:44 PM
32

Are you fucking serious?? This guy is basically saying sometimes its okay to not fight. It's okay to let your guard down. It's extremely draining to constantly be fighting. I can't believe you could read something like this and still write what you did. You have no idea what he has been through and you are presuming it must be his lack of responsibility?!? He is asking for help. This one time. and you are accusing him of playing the victim.. You sound really fucking ignorant. One of those people…
/r/MensRights14/12/17 03:19 PM
1

Thanks heaps for this, very insightful. I'll be sure to go over it in detail. Really appreciate your effort.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 02:47 AM
6

So tenants in a house with three or less people and not living with the owner can get away with discrimination... that's ridiculous. Thanks for the insight mate.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 02:46 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter