TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Qantourisc Archive

View 1 posts and 1,184 comments by Qantourisc on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
54

Marriage/ChildrenQantourisc/r/MensRights19/05/22 04:52 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,184 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I think it's because you get kids once you have established your life. Everybody is surviving, so this comes later. People forgot the value of social and family success VS financially / status success.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 09:44 AM
4

some men are not as capable as other men ; never stopped them drafting all men.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 09:30 AM
1

These hits have no extra info on top of that: Is it bots ? Its it AI-data-scarping ? And what is the gender of people doing the hits ? Are they running ad's; that also causes hits. Is it individual HTTP requests (1 visit creates multiple requests), or are it actual visits (page requests) ? ...
/r/MensRights21/04/26 09:42 AM
5

BTW in the past, this was more fair even WITHOUT being forced. Why ? Pregnancy without modern medicine has significant risks in humans.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 08:33 PM
1

It's hard for men Well most men, some men should definitely be slut shamed ; I know at least one :).
/r/MensRights18/04/26 02:49 PM
1

Which is a problem we cannot fix at the company level, but only by working on social norm and wishes. But that still implies men and woman would need to have a 50/50 distribution in time raising kids. And on average woman would pick kids over work ... so you will never fix this.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 10:40 AM
3

I'm a believer that teaching men when they are being abused, will increase the awareness of what abuse is, and thus reduce abuse for both genders.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 10:23 AM
7

Yea there is a comedian who asked a room of people who is the most gay friendly, it went a little like this: Man, if you woman fucked a woman in the past, would you still be attracted to her ? YES Woman, if you man fucked a man in the past, would you still be attracted to her ? Nervous room. I guess I proved my point.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 03:22 PM
1

O I misread, i'm so used of them just being assholes to me... my bad. Commend deleted.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 04:23 AM
2

I don't like quotas anywhere, also not here.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 07:09 PM
3

They ain't canceling the draft. They will only cancel it if it also affects woman. So we have to fight discrimination of men on the draft. Only then we can get it canceled.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 07:08 PM
1

Woman would rather fight to get themselves excluded from the draft, then to fight to end it. So good luck on that.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 05:55 AM
1

We know how to stop wars, but we haven't defeated the system. We need to stop having narcissists at the top ; and a chain of people who do not believe in hierarchy and just following orders. But that gets you fired.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 05:54 AM
3

However, right now women do not represent the same casualty rates as men. Whatever you do, this will stay the same. Only if you have forced quota's this will change. Why: on average men can carry more weight. Hence, on average men will be more at the front.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 05:52 AM
2

Look at that list of entities that filed an appeal... almost all of them are woman's rights groups... disgusting.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 05:50 AM
4

Even men with physical disabilities are excluded... so yes pregnant women would be excluded. In some places even people with non-disabilities but shortcomings that affect your ability to walk long distances get disqualified.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 05:45 AM
1

In the US you have precedents, that sort of act as a law.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 10:28 AM
1

80% of rape victims knew their offender.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 09:58 AM
9

By criminals.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 09:54 AM
1

Reactive abuse does exist. But it's not an excuse: When it happen this is the moment a bloody light bulb should go on ; hold yourself accountable, and exit that situation. (Regardless of the genders involved.)
/r/MensRights26/03/26 10:45 AM
1

Did I say anything about being together with the wrong person ?!?
/r/MensRights25/03/26 04:03 PM
0

Why do you care so much about dating? Because humans crave connection.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 11:06 AM
1

Question 1 was work, question 2 was height ? You missed nothing. When i'm dating or chatting with someone, work is like topic number 5 to discuss. Unless said person indicates "I love my job" then i'll ask about what she enjoys. Otherwise, anyone who cares about your job, has issues.
/r/MensRights23/02/26 11:57 AM
1

O yea, demonise them more, that will fix all your misogyny.
/r/MensRights23/02/26 11:47 AM
3

Assuming he can save all the money he urns. That's about a year of working for free. That's nothing to scuff at.
/r/MensRights21/02/26 11:05 AM
3

Depends on what definition of "incel" you use. You might want to specify that.
/r/MensRights21/02/26 10:59 AM
3

Yea prenups are unromantic, so are contracts, unless you are a notary maybe. Also UNO reverso card : if it's not going to fail, there is no reason to worry about the prenup.
/r/MensRights20/02/26 01:14 PM
2

The same men. All the statisics and expierences point to this.
/r/MensRights20/02/26 09:40 AM
1

I need social fabric. As a man I notice a giant correlation between wanting to be productive and being loved.
/r/MensRights20/02/26 09:39 AM
1

Depends on what they say next. So far it has been "do better".
/r/MensRights20/02/26 09:38 AM
1

Yes I can do all the talk with therapists and strangers. That doesn't fix one-sided relationships, or people being overworked and not having energy for friends in general. In this fucked up capatlistic world, I need a gf or platonic relationship to not feel alone.
/r/MensRights20/02/26 09:37 AM
1

The correct answer is : if a woman murders me because i'm a a man I want equal revenge.
/r/MensRights20/02/26 09:30 AM
5

If you want this it is still STUPIDLY easy : make a law that punishes all killings based on discrimination. But we can't have laws that protect everyone , or punish everyone now can we ?
/r/MensRights17/02/26 10:51 PM
33

Wikipedia is a cesspool of editors guarding their pages. Not even top professional researchers bother to correct or update articles on their OWN research. See and probably many more resources. https://www.reddit.com/r/wikipedia/comments/1itasdr/retaining_academics_as_wikipedia_editors_is/
/r/MensRights17/02/26 10:35 PM
1

Utterly disgusting.
/r/MensRights17/02/26 10:29 PM
1

Suicide is an issue for all gender, but predominately men.
/r/MensRights17/02/26 10:49 AM
1

It will , cause at this rate at some point things will implode and woman might start loosing rights.
/r/MensRights17/02/26 10:47 AM
3

O men did most certainly did not always had rights. For most countries the gap between men and woman was relatively small; especially when we you have to consider most came from an oligarchy. Example: right to vote Proof & Data: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/universal-suffrage-lexical?time=1900
/r/MensRights15/02/26 10:44 AM
2

Ok, but what's your point ? And who says men aren't scared of men ? I mean if I let my brain do it's thing i'm also scared of lot of people on the street.
/r/MensRights15/02/26 10:34 AM
1

Keep wondering if I should go to some gay bars to feel wanted. But I also do not wish to mislead any gay person ^.^
/r/MensRights15/02/26 10:29 AM
1

Nea back in the "old days" and I find this disgusting, they just spewed sexist stereotypes and objectification. But the core sentiment was they still generally still wanted woman, and didn't hate them at all. Especially the married man. Think Al Bundy from Married With Children.
/r/MensRights15/02/26 10:28 AM
1

The baby things, I do not know where she got that illusion from indeed. Probably just hate & fear.
/r/MensRights15/02/26 10:17 AM
2

How are you supposed to react ? "I am sorry that has been your experience." <= This actually validates men and this person. She is however not being rational at all when she says statistics, news and everyday reality proof that. Cause it does not. (Well might depend on where you live exactly.)
/r/MensRights15/02/26 10:15 AM
1

Water is wet ? It's good that there is research, but did we need that to believe it ?
/r/MensRights14/02/26 05:17 PM
1

Honestly, if the United States ever does something truly evil and starts, like, bulk executing people You ehhh ... might want to check the news and/or social media ...
/r/MensRights14/02/26 09:41 AM
0

When you see a corporation engaging in misandry, Most companies do their market research. (Unless you are UbiSoft, MicroSoft, Disney and Gilette.) So that implies they know there is a market for this.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 09:38 AM
1

You could reflect that energy back: only 1% of woman are murdered. So it's not important. Bet they won't like that tone.
/r/MensRights10/02/26 01:02 PM
2

It's a veil attempt to not say 'all men' , while keeping the focus on the gender part & feeling like the better gender. It removes focus from the actions we are trying to stop, and instead make it a gender war.
/r/MensRights09/02/26 10:59 PM
2

If a woman is mean and can reject other men, it signals that she's high value. Not in my book, mean people are very low value.
/r/MensRights09/02/26 11:44 AM
2

Problem is you guys have a binary vote. You need a sane option.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 05:44 PM
1

That map could be more green yes. I will however assume rabel111 is talking about his local situation ? So while yes many nations have much to fix. In many places men are (like woman) second certain on certain areas. I also though share rabel111's sentiment. If you are talking about nations that never made progress on rights: I support them. But in the green areas of that map : screw supporting woman.
/r/MensRights04/02/26 09:58 PM
1

Ocuh, yea, anyone lasting 500 edits is going to be part of the wikipedia cesspool. They are as bad as some reddit mods.
/r/MensRights04/02/26 09:51 PM
7

Try to edit it, see if it gets reverted.
/r/MensRights04/02/26 04:36 PM
1

I assume you are mostly talking about the USA ? Temporary setback until you can get the lunatics out of your government.
/r/MensRights04/02/26 04:30 PM
0

There wasn't much complains about ICE in the past years. Enforcing immigration laws is not what is happening right now. People are getting abducted (due to lack of trial) and killed left and right by ICE. ICE at this point in time = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung Also see: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2026/jan/04/ice-2025-deaths-timeline That's around a 2000% increase in deaths. And that is WITHOUT people killed on the streets.
/r/MensRights03/02/26 08:48 AM
1

14:11 - She isn't asking , she is telling. And that entire section is very demeaning. I'm not sure how that section would not be considered hate-speech.
/r/MensRights01/02/26 08:20 PM
2

Depending on where and what , but both men and woman have their own "this is fucked up and not fair".
/r/MensRights01/02/26 08:17 AM
1

Shame they are ICE apologists.
/r/MensRights31/01/26 05:59 AM
1

HMmm ... one could use this as (more) scientific proof that there is sexism against men.
/r/MensRights27/01/26 06:49 PM
2

If you are in the UK, write the party you would consider voting for IF they cared about equal rights (and with that I mean men's rights too). And that you would prefer not having to vote for extreme parties to be heard.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 11:17 AM
1

Reconsider keeping on emotionally good terms with people like this.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 11:11 AM
1

That was evident when she agreed with her, before she even replied to his rebuttal.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 11:10 AM
1

I'm quite sure men are marginalized these days.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 11:06 AM
2

Send them an email that you will NOT sign up because you feel discriminated against. And if you are considering contacting a lawyer also include that.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 11:04 AM
1

Haircut prices should depend on the job, not the gender.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 11:03 AM
1

No need, you can aspirate fresh sperm directly from the balls. (It's usually still viable.) Problem is : if you do want kids at some point, this means you have to put your woman through IVF. Which means costs, several hormone injections, and many hospital visits. So none of this is an ideal solution at all, if you want kids. So no not "problem solved". 1 problem solved 4 more created.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 08:57 AM
1

Yes, but also if you are in a committed relationship where there should be trust ... though I would get snipped, cause it's usually better for everyone involved.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 08:55 AM
1

That's a great solution IF you never want to have kids.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 10:53 AM
1

I disagree. I don’t accept abortion either. I don't agree, but at least you are consistent, and that can be applauded.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 10:49 AM
2

Would you agree that if she chooses to engage in intercourse without birth control / protection , that she should lose the right to have an abortion ?
/r/MensRights24/01/26 10:48 AM
1

In most cases, I think it's reasonable to assume they BOTH cause the cumming inside. I mean both parties are present and know what is happening. Also pre-cum can get you pregnant, so still a lame take.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 10:47 AM
2

Read OP : it clearly states : The man took reasonable precautions to prevent pregnancyThe man took reasonable precautions to prevent pregnancy
/r/MensRights24/01/26 10:45 AM
3

Yea I also had no compassion at this point, because they never cared about ours.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 10:44 AM
1

If the state thinks this is the best for the child, then the state should pay.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 10:43 AM
1

Yea ChatGPT totally forget about accountability of the mother here. (If clearly communicated the men did not want to be a father and took precautions.)
/r/MensRights24/01/26 10:42 AM
1

Sabotage or lying about birth control could be considered rape. (And has been in at least 1 court case in Germany.) And entrapment is not a rare thing.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 10:33 AM
5

In a debate and getting meaningful useful actions, yes it's shallow. But that doesn't matter yet because people aren't listening yet. Step 1 is making noise.
/r/MensRights20/01/26 11:09 AM
13

Are we talking "not having sex now", or "not at all" ?
/r/MensRights20/01/26 10:53 AM
1

The biggest issue ? Apathy. Hard to fix a single issue when people do not seem to care.
/r/MensRights16/01/26 06:03 PM
1

Don't explain, just give him your tinder account and with him the best of luck for yourself.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 02:45 PM
1

Who the hell was that chat in grey ? my god. Why do you know this person ?
/r/MensRights17/12/25 11:16 PM
2

If the bank doesn't pay your insurance, do you blame the person paying for insurance ? Can't get defrauded by the bank if you don't have insurance with your bank ?!?
/r/MensRights16/12/25 05:57 AM
2

How is that different then lying about birth control?
/r/MensRights16/12/25 05:52 AM
5

Sounds like he was raped.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 05:49 AM
3

"Netherlands must better recognise role of gender in domestic violence, expert body says" -> AKA believes/values aka often religion ?!? If not those, then not surely are you assuming all men think less of woman ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/25 10:24 PM
1

Statics say otherwise: there are more suicide from men then woman. So that laughter and empathy gap seems extremely deadly.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 09:20 PM
1

I was with a great woman ones, (nothing serious) but she DID ask for consent !
/r/MensRights23/11/25 10:08 PM
5

Don't say it, do not lie. Say egalitarian. Also feminism is not a gender neutral word, so that's also not acceptable ;)
/r/MensRights22/11/25 09:41 PM
63

The messages is exactly why you should post it ; and just proves your point. Who can't you critique ? Those are your oppressors. Also feel free to send them my way ^.^
/r/MensRights21/11/25 06:02 PM
1

underrepresented groups, HAHAHA, the irony, definitely that's men's issue right now.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 10:07 AM
11

O there most definitely is. Drawing attention to male victims after yet another report on female victims of partner violence. Anyone drawing attention to the men are downvoted. Meanwhile 0 articles about male victims in YEARS; and almost yearly about the woman. There is definitely misandry present.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 06:08 PM
1

If you are not woman-keeping your woman , and not man-keeping your man ; then you are doing relationships wrong IMO.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 09:35 AM
1

Yes less people would be good, but we aren't looking at decline, we are looking at RAPID decline, and that creates a LOT of problems !
/r/MensRights24/10/25 07:00 AM
2

NOBODY should be in a war zone.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 06:57 AM
1

Also this is a stupid argument : these days it's a lot easier to flee (if they do not stop you). People didn't used to own cars.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 06:54 AM
2

Well the men where blocked, the woman where not. Sooo ....
/r/MensRights17/10/25 03:55 PM
2

That used the one of the main reasons to keep woman from the front. But in modern times with freedom and ability to travel this makes no sense.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 03:45 PM
1

No we just blame Putin (and anyone in Russia who support this) and the gendered draft. Putin happens to be 1 horrible man. But that's 1 man out of all the man on the planet who are NOT starting wars !
/r/MensRights17/10/25 03:43 PM
1

It itself, this article can not be an issue *IF* there have been many articles displaying the suffering of man. But I doubt that is the case.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 03:39 PM
1

For sex and orgasms I have porn. But what I seek in a woman is intimacy, so she's not speaking for me.
/r/MensRights05/10/25 03:33 PM
1

Sounds like they want a slave ? Look for someone who wants a partner.
/r/MensRights04/10/25 08:59 AM
55

You can add baldness to that list.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 10:45 AM
3

If you want presumption of innocence (which you should). Yes this is a problem. Putting people behind bars unjustly is unacceptable. Getting away with rape is also unacceptable.
/r/MensRights05/09/25 05:15 AM
1

How years of not being desired can feel. It's a different kind of pain. I don't think most woman understand this feeling. Maybe the elderly.
/r/MensRights02/09/25 10:10 PM
1

So is loneliness.
/r/MensRights30/08/25 04:35 PM
3

"There is no alternative to compulsory military service," <= yea there is, make people have something worth fighting for : a good life and a good social circle. But the current state of lemon-squeezing people , dating market, and social fabric ... fuck no.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 04:58 AM
4

What am I fighting for ? A spouse I don't have ? A country that loves me ? Men will fight, IF they have something worth fighting for. Now ? Good luck, especially in your typical conscription bracket.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 04:53 AM
3

My advise has been indeed making an app that does this for both genders.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 02:44 AM
1

My gut reaction is : dude , wear the condom, have the kids your want, have a vasectomy
/r/MensRights19/08/25 03:58 AM
1

who have had to endure a host of side-effects and serious health risks associated with their hormonal birth control methods. <= Or ... you could NOT take them ?
/r/MensRights19/08/25 03:49 AM
1

Need to add some prompt shit too it, to counter that agreeableness.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 03:46 AM
1

O they subconsciously know what they are doing, they just can't control it, and the self protects them from seeing it.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 03:35 AM
1

Cluster B gets my empathy and understanding, but not my friendship. They _will_ destroy your sanity, or at least mine.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 03:33 AM
2

Depends on how long you have been using the drug. There are permanent effects if you take it for more then a 2 years.
/r/MensRights17/08/25 04:08 AM
1

Still feels wrong.
/r/MensRights17/08/25 04:02 AM
2

I once knew a social worker... some of them have serious issues.
/r/MensRights16/08/25 11:05 AM
1

What if you made it for both genders ? Won't have woman anyway, they have tea.
/r/MensRights10/08/25 06:33 AM
1

Also try the "insert race group here" test. If it sounds racist, them maybe it's sexist and you should not use the same logic.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 10:36 AM
1

Statistically ? Sure good chance , but how is this related ?
/r/MensRights28/07/25 06:26 PM
2

Yes unreasonable, because more men are killed then woman.
/r/MensRights28/07/25 05:07 PM
2

"Are we dating the same men" AKA: Gossip app for woman. The problem is : a lot is going to be defamation , and pictures posted without your consent.
/r/MensRights27/07/25 05:40 AM
2

It's a deflection rooted in them not caring. Call them out on them minimizing / neglecting other victims. If they double down, end the conversation with : if you have no empathy for others, you deserve none yourself.
/r/MensRights18/07/25 10:35 AM
8

Our problem with it is consent !
/r/MensRights25/06/25 08:06 AM
5

I hope you are no contact with your parents. This is just unforgivable.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 08:04 AM
6

It is a slur (o me) , any time I have seen it used, it's been used as "do as I say / want" and do not be yourself. And the tool of manipulation in this case it shame.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 09:51 AM
1

Yea that looks like nothing about equality of just pure sexism.
/r/MensRights18/06/25 02:45 PM
1

Here is my recent take on all this: yes make your profile so that you filter out anyone who would waste your time. Stand out for the ones who would love you because of you. And stand out to keep the ones who will be a waste of time away from you.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 07:09 AM
1

Didn't even need to check the source to know it was Australia.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 09:46 PM
1

I always roll my eyes when woman feel unsafe. We are statically more likely to get hurt. And as if most men can defend themself against a crazy person who has gotten in far more fights in their life then you did. Especially if they bring any weapon to the game.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 03:37 PM
3

I agree, if they have to force someone to listen, they don't really care.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 04:56 AM
1

Killing woman because they are woman probably does happen, the question is : does it happen often ? Can we say a significant amount of deaths are a result of there gender ?
/r/MensRights17/05/25 12:47 PM
1

Biggest stupidity, they might be causing exactly what they fear...
/r/MensRights15/05/25 10:35 PM
1

Wait ... EXCUSE ME ? Ok being dismissive, of men is one thing. But THIS ? This is insane, anyone involved in this should be deeply ashamed of themselves.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 10:19 PM
2

What kind of romantic content ?
/r/MensRights15/05/25 10:04 PM
-7

I can't agree with this one: it wasn't a space created for men.
/r/MensRights04/05/25 06:00 PM
1

Yes this unfair. Are you unhappy with the new classroom ? -> File a complained somewhere. Are you OK with the new classroom ? -> Write a formal letter to the school you accept their solution to the situation and understand their situation. But however highly object to the gender discrimination and that you wish a written apology for the inconvenience and discrimination.
/r/MensRights02/05/25 06:51 AM
1

Depends if you are running a 'thinking' AI or a 'gut response' AI. AI's capable (and doing) of reflection will easily pass this. AI's using gut-reflex will be heavily favoured. Like I just tested chat GPT, initial reasoning OK-ish, but still had to prod it at it's double standards, and then it wised up.
/r/MensRights27/04/25 10:21 AM
3

Maybe in the following years we can finally begin electing candidates who will consider voting for policies that favor us No favour's please, just equality, this is what got us in this mess in the first place.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 04:33 AM
1

False Accusations can be difficult to legally prove. That's OK. Proving someone is guilty is how we want it (this should go both ways).
/r/MensRights16/04/25 09:10 AM
24

Mirror the punishment the opposing party would have gotten.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 06:25 PM
1

There is nothing immoral about it. The definition of immoral doesn't match here. Unhealthy (relationship / trust wise) , but not immoral, how could it be immoral ?
/r/MensRights05/04/25 08:09 PM
5

There are a lot of downsides, she better be worth it.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 05:48 AM
9

If it's biased then it's not research, it is an opinion.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 07:07 AM
8

You asked what rights we don't have. You got an answer, and your reply is : but woman have it worse ? Both issues can exist at the same time. I think most men don't mind there being attention to issues more common for woman. But we hate the zero sum game, where any male issue is thrown under the bus to get all focus on woman's issues.
/r/MensRights26/03/25 08:20 AM
1

Ok fair, but still kills by proxy, but just can't use suicide numbers as proof for this then.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 07:43 PM
6

Try substituting men with blacks, you recon people would accept that statement ?
/r/MensRights25/03/25 07:40 PM
3

And your point ?
/r/MensRights25/03/25 07:37 PM
11

Call out double standards, call out lack of empathy based on gender. This will get us half-way. Now both are invisible. Awareness proceeds change.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 11:52 AM
1

With some people you definitely cannot reasonably control if they get pissed off or not. So good luck with that.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 06:14 PM
3

A sweet, go wild then :)
/r/MensRights21/03/25 11:30 AM
4

EDIT: disregard comment below, Adolescence isn't a documentary I once watched 1 documentary of Netflix ... well started watching 1 with an area I have expertise in, stopped after 5 mins : do not trust their documentaries.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 11:22 AM
0

They will likely kill as many as they need to get cooperation from the rest.
/r/MensRights20/03/25 07:18 PM
16

Is there ? I think with general feminism you are looking for the word egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights15/03/25 11:55 AM
8

Double standards and invisibility of men their issues and rights.
/r/MensRights12/03/25 11:10 PM
3

According to my BMI i'm preobese. But it's not because I have a lot of fat ;)
/r/MensRights12/03/25 11:04 PM
1

This is going to be short : no.
/r/MensRights11/03/25 10:11 PM
1

Because it's politically incorrect + years of PR for woman's suppression
/r/MensRights11/03/25 10:43 AM
1

Op mentioned someone started with "But ..." so someone made it a competition.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 07:59 PM
1

Reply what: which is worst ? People trying to kill themselves or actually succeeding ? Now do you want to continue playing victim Olympic ? Or recognise everybody can struggle regardless of their gender and just try to help everyone ?
/r/MensRights10/03/25 07:56 PM
1

Problem is : what if you do ever want kids ?
/r/MensRights05/02/25 06:58 AM
1

Condoms are not 100% effective.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 06:55 AM
2

Yes, and often they hate it ^.^ same for allemony.
/r/MensRights29/01/25 08:02 AM
3

Yes it is, next question please.
/r/MensRights29/01/25 07:55 AM
1

Everything can be comedy, problem is usually some topics are generally disliked, like victims. Except hated groups, then it's suddenly less disliked, and that's a problem.
/r/MensRights29/01/25 07:54 AM
23

Thank you !
/r/MensRights24/01/25 05:51 PM
2

The day states bans references sex in any regulation or laws will be a great step forwards for womans, mens and LG+ rights
/r/MensRights23/01/25 05:26 AM
7

YGTBFKM
/r/MensRights14/01/25 05:44 PM
1

Why not just ask ?
/r/MensRights02/01/25 06:52 PM
1

I'm sorry I care about equality / double standards. And ain't "nobody" speaking for men.
/r/MensRights27/12/24 06:41 AM
1

Not sure how I stand on that, doesn't sit right with me. My sexual preference would be to not have an attraction to people having an issue with things that do not affect them. Such as people going both ways. Now I think I know why : why don't you like bi men ? Does it make them less of a men?
/r/MensRights27/12/24 06:39 AM
3

Woman do care, they are faaaar less tolerant of bisexual man when it comes to their mate selection. So while women may "accept" it, they don't choice it. Which will also steer behaviour and make it not an option for men.
/r/MensRights26/12/24 05:33 AM
10

This is exactly part of the issue: want to wear female clothing ? You are gay or a femboy. Let's not define people only on what they wear.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 07:47 PM
6

This is exactly part of the issue: want to wear female clothing ? You are gay or a femboy. Let's not define people only on what they wear.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 07:47 PM
2

IMO this is one is both men and woman / all of society. But it should be accepted that men wear "female" clothing.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 07:45 PM
1

If you add hours worked, there might even be a male pay gap !
/r/MensRights23/12/24 10:46 AM
1

IMO equal pay is good but woman are going to need to evolve past their animalistic behaviours...
/r/MensRights23/12/24 10:41 AM
1

(Excluding negations skills for wage, as men tend to be assertive.)
/r/MensRights23/12/24 10:39 AM
1

This article is like edging on making an understanding breakthrough, but they are stuck on their view of woman are the victim. Most of it saying: there isn't a pay-gap , there is a work-choice gap.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 10:37 AM
6

Or old women, just generally not collected.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 06:57 AM
8

Either accept this or separate. This kind of behaviour is the kinds of "you get what you get" you can't make someone care. If they don't and you need them to: get out.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 06:47 AM
9

And if anonymity is guaranteed, the laws can be lifted, retroactively. (Which will happen in Belgium.)
/r/MensRights22/12/24 10:38 AM
1

Seems to help a lot of people. But for me it would be a no. It's not the kind of connection I crave.
/r/MensRights16/12/24 08:25 AM
5

Which is why we are in this mess in the first place : don't rock to boat
/r/MensRights13/12/24 09:51 AM
5

My reply would be : to bad i'm asking, so go ask your boss.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 10:23 PM
3

encouraging a boy to take school more seriously You will need to start at yourself. Kids don't generally take things serious. Think about making things interesting, discipline, and/or motivational techniques (wants, desires, consequences, results, ...)
/r/MensRights11/12/24 08:51 AM
35

Who are these delusional people ? Men being chipped to the front, woman suffer most ? GTFO.
/r/MensRights06/12/24 11:01 PM
10

Work-life balance isn't working for men either. :shrug:
/r/MensRights05/12/24 08:23 PM
1

Creates more security for them; but they act like not having the pill is wronging them compared to men, and that's what get's to me. -> Not having the pill is men's reality, to this very day.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 10:02 PM
1

Women have been struggling for ages to get their methods of birth control. They could just use the only (non permanent) thing men have : condoms ... So I don't see your argument there.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 06:50 PM
10

There are actually options to not have menstrual pains if you don't want kids (IIRC)
/r/MensRights02/12/24 07:13 PM
9

How about 50 men and 50 woman instead of just 50 men ?
/r/MensRights29/11/24 07:00 PM
14

Sounds cheap when you know 30% of those who do a test find out it's not theirs.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 06:38 AM
1

Punish the behaviour, not the gender, thanks.
/r/MensRights27/11/24 06:49 AM
2

The biggest issue is : society doesn't care about men as a whole. Any issue you will find in this post will untimely stem back to : we don't care about men like we do about women. Fix that, and the other issues will actually en naturally be addressed. And then true equality can be achieved.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 11:17 PM
53

BTW this is a form of fascism.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 10:48 AM
6

Let me correct that for you: It is common not to be loved, but is not normal.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 08:04 AM
5

100% of Gaza's dead are humans. There fixed the title for you.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 06:54 PM
1

She didn't want to hear your side ? ... i'd be careful around that one.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 06:03 PM
1

I can stand babies by I can't stand adolescents ha :D
/r/MensRights04/11/24 06:01 PM
3

Because uninformed idiots. ; or idiots on purpose.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 06:01 PM
1

No need to freeze sperm IIRC: they can still aspirate it directly from your balls.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 06:00 PM
47

“don’t have sex if you don’t want a baby” If they say that: throw it back in their face ?
/r/MensRights28/10/24 10:13 PM
19

It's scapegoating, very effective means of political warfare.
/r/MensRights28/10/24 10:11 PM
1

Yes, though I definitely think woman should have abortion rights. But we should also have paper abortions cause we do not get a say once contraception fails. (Yes practically it will be hard to implement, but that's another can of worms. We aren't even at the moral understanding yet this should be a thing. And yes all bets are off if the men didn't ask about or use anti-conception.)
/r/MensRights25/10/24 08:26 PM
2

In case you don't want to be a parent : We don't have any opt-out parental rights. In case you want to be a parent : Lucky we do have the rights to be a father. (Though in some places family court is biased and the default isn't 50/50.)
/r/MensRights25/10/24 08:22 PM
1

What if ? It's annoying to say the least. I believe in autonomy for all, which would mean tough luck for the men in this case. If we could teleport the baby out into an artificial womb. But that's not a thing, so we still have to deal with the facts of reality.
/r/MensRights25/10/24 05:07 AM
1

Dave Chappelle : ... And if I'm wrong, then perhaps we're wrong. So, figure that s**t out for yourselves. If you can kill this motherf***er, I can at least abandon 'em. It's my money, my choice. And if I'm wrong, then perhaps we're wrong. So, figure that s**t out for yourselves.
/r/MensRights24/10/24 10:42 PM
9

Don't fight for a cause if they do not return the favour. You are under no obligation to do so. But don't oppose their fight either, as that would be unjust. Is it bad that woman in some places do not have abortion right: yes. Do I care no, because I don't have any either.
/r/MensRights24/10/24 04:31 AM
2

Yes you'd need to retrain it with all the gender stripped out of the input data.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 09:55 AM
2

Then it then, now is now. Change it ! (Well you can't personally of course.)
/r/MensRights13/10/24 09:03 AM
4

Yes because happier men is also good for women. I believe in egalitarians, celebrating and fighting for fairness for all. Only fighting for one gender is sexist and indicates you only care for 1 gender. No, what does their gender matter ? That fact that it's ignored and ridiculed + conscription Yes, laws should contain no gender or gender-specific genitalia.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 09:01 AM
1

I'll keep saying it : remove all reference to genitalia or gender in all rules and laws if you really care for gender equality.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 10:08 AM
3

If you still worked there I would have made you an infograph to print and leave lying around :D
/r/MensRights11/10/24 09:56 PM
0

If the porn use upsets you, maybe it's time to ask why he uses it and why it upsets you ? I don't talk to a lot of men, but I suspect if men are sexually satisfied, they won't use porn.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 10:08 AM
5

We are blaming the government for making needlessly gendered laws. In this case genital mutilation laws, and EXCLUDING protection for men.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 10:05 AM
9

If a man has a purpose or something to live or die for, he typically will also own something. (Family will cause him to own a house, a goal or purpose typically requires resources and thus you would own something, ...) Lack or purpose is the cause of not owning anything. So imo you agree in a roundabout way.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 09:22 PM
26

Even AI are misandrist. AI gives the most likely answer. And the most likely answer is misandristic.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 05:50 PM
–

What would fixing it take ? What would you gain ?
/r/MenSupportMen23/09/24 06:39 PM
1

Addendum IMO : *mandatory* joint custody by default, unless: Specific circumstances making the parent unfit. One parent willing to relinquish, and the other willing to accept more custody.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 02:39 PM
3

Protection against discimination. (Depending on where you live.)
/r/MensRights14/09/24 04:55 PM
6

Why wait ?
/r/MensRights27/08/24 09:41 PM
2

Good, here is your new and better label : egalitarian What feminism should have always been. But feminism is sexists by it's very definition: because it's only about woman's rights.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 12:14 PM
3

If you had sex without any protection, fair (as it is reckless), but protections can fail or be lied about...
/r/MensRights23/08/24 12:08 PM
12

The governments around the world have pretty much just decided that the potential wellbeing of a child is more important than a man's rights. OK, but that's a copout by the goverment, if they goverment cares, the goverment should pay.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 12:03 PM
1

You are thinking about : who is most likely to succeed in battle. Others are thinking : is one life worth less to sacrifice for war then another based on their gender ?
/r/MensRights20/08/24 05:33 PM
1

Praise you mom, though this should be the default.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 11:39 AM
1

Using some feminists logic: Good men have been alimony suppressed for decades ! Time for some payback ! /s
/r/MensRights07/08/24 10:53 AM
1

There are soo many things you can do to limit hyper gammy.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 07:35 AM
1

This is just utterly respect-less and distasteful my god. I'd be ashamed to publish this.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 02:30 PM
1

Lonely
/r/MensRights27/07/24 07:03 PM
2

Legally, yes you can TRY (tough it's going to called differently in many countries). But will you be taken seriously ? And won't she claim rape if she gets wind of this, and what if she will be taken serious ...
/r/MensRights26/06/24 10:34 PM
1

If I do some head-math: no not more men will be killed. You would just replace the non-combat role men. But also yes, more drafted men will be killed then woman if that was your point.
/r/MensRights22/06/24 10:32 PM
10

Feminists are people that fight for the rights of women I hope you didn't mean this super literal, because if so ... If you don't fight for equality/rights regardless of all genders/people, that's sexist.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 10:09 PM
48

This is abusive ; treat carefully. It might read it's head if the relationship ends.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 10:03 PM
5

What did you bet, on , and how did that bet go ?
/r/MensRights16/06/24 11:11 AM
2

No problem is you stop 1 step to soon: So there is no such programming, but they WILL get angry. At that point you 100% socially dismiss them, and there IS programming for that. And then they will get even MORE angry. Then you give them no space for that anger, and then things will start to shift, because at some point that collapses, they can't sub-stain that anger.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 09:04 AM
2

If it's yearly, I'd be fed up after year 2 of this BS and start some serious counter-campaigning (well counter as in addressing men's issues, not so much removing woman's right)
/r/MensRights15/06/24 09:01 AM
14

If you want to make it formal "I'm sorry we nolonger share enough common values for this friendship to work, I wish you to best."
/r/MensRights14/06/24 06:59 AM
1

"we men must take responsibility for it all" <- No it's not because I share ONE genes that I am responsible for all those people. This has a name when it comes to other genes: racism.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 10:22 PM
2

I'm all for kissing your babies, kids, friends, family, ... , but not on the bloody mouth/lips...
/r/MensRights13/06/24 10:10 PM
1

You need a microscope, and then you still need to have a reference ... will all be very difficult.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 10:05 AM
1

Vote for anyone else, "but my vote will be wasted". Well if you are going to get screwed from the left and the right, you try to make a run for it anyway.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 04:32 AM
1

Was a perfect comment, ... except ad hominem, so downvote.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 04:29 AM
2

How would I know ?!?
/r/MensRights12/06/24 04:26 AM
2

Here is my theory: the top of the top of chest players are some form of neuro-divergence (not necessarily ASD) ; and men are more likely to be divergent. As such if you want the top ... Another filter is men generally being more OK JUST doing their work/hobby as a sole focus. So IMO it's odd's.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 10:27 AM
2

Not sure, either joking or serious. :shrug:
/r/MensRights08/06/24 10:22 PM
1

They should, 9mm pistols ! https://www.warhistoryonline.com/instant-articles/history-of-u-s-military-sidearms.html
/r/MensRights08/06/24 10:21 PM
5

They should, spacecrafts got trashed ! https://spacemath.gsfc.nasa.gov/weekly/6Page53.pdf
/r/MensRights08/06/24 11:39 AM
1

As a general rule: if you fucked your ex, you fucked up. Unless you can keep it casual and not involve the reasons why you broke up. But in this case it looks like you should stay far away.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 08:20 AM
4

If you got diversity hires: yea that shouldn't happen. (But I wasn't kidding about some servers being heavy.)
/r/MensRights08/06/24 08:19 AM
14

Yea those servers are heavy to put in. :) (And no not kidding.)
/r/MensRights08/06/24 07:02 AM
10

*23kg for those who wonder
/r/MensRights08/06/24 07:02 AM
6

Redshirting, not sure how I feel about that. It would be used to bash us anyway.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 06:41 PM
8

Good man. Also time to every time someone brings up "gender pay gap" reply with "Woman's job decisions"
/r/MensRights07/06/24 10:16 AM
13

I haven't seen many ugly woman in my life, but I have seen many unhealthy woman, and that is fixable.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 09:32 PM
1

Everything else ? If literal: then abort it the second 1 of the parent's don't want it. The best interests for the child is having 2 willing parents !
/r/MensRights05/06/24 07:15 AM
1

So not pro-choice then ? I gather ?
/r/MensRights05/06/24 07:11 AM
2

Anticonception can fail. (Or be sabotaged/lied about)
/r/MensRights05/06/24 07:10 AM
1

Her body, her choice, her responsibility. (Though you should be able to get legal guarantees from the men when she has to make her choice.)
/r/MensRights05/06/24 07:06 AM
57

MRA's are generally booed out at creation, so it just because emotionally and socially really hard to not cave.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 07:04 AM
2

Empathy gap and unable to cope with not being the only victem.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 09:53 PM
8

Real question though, does cause of death matter ? https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/homicide-rate-by-sex There are 2 death men for every death woman in Australia.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 09:51 AM
8

O M G And what a WONDERFULL way to start a conversation by implying there is something wrong with men as a whole. /s That will be VERY effective at what you wish to achieve. /s
/r/MensRights02/06/24 09:48 AM
2

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019188692300329X Off with her hair: Intrasexually competitive women advise other women to cut off more hair
/r/MensRights31/05/24 06:32 AM
1

It's not good that mutilation of children is forbidden ? But yes "Wonderful" might be a bit to enthusiastic I get that. But it's a deliberate choice for PR and psychological purposes.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 06:30 AM
3

IMOH You can keep it short and simple: FGM is forbidden, and that is wonderful ! But when are boy babies getting the same protection against MGM ?
/r/MensRights29/05/24 08:04 AM
1

The big one isn't the waiting etc, it's organizing, seeing a doctor requesting it etc. I'll be spending far more time on it then 30 mins, it's just that long to drive to and from the doctor to get the prescription.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 08:06 PM
1

Depends on where you live. Where I live yes both boys and girls get this offered during there schoolyears. But wasn't the case when I was younger.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 02:35 PM
1

It only protects against a few strains. Though probably the important ones. Should put it on my project list. But I don't have a project list ...
/r/MensRights28/05/24 02:35 PM
1

Is it ? I'd need a good doctor to talk about it. Usually they say don't bother above 26y. Ow because "most already have been exposed". Might be interesting for me to have a look at it then.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 10:57 AM
8

Looked into it, would cost me 260€ to get vaccinated where I live.
/r/MensRights28/05/24 04:38 AM
1

Check todays TinMan's post ... 1 of many reasons.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 10:40 PM
4

and she was on top
/r/MensRights26/05/24 06:37 PM
0

is not going to result in stealthing. https://www.dw.com/en/germany-woman-sentenced-for-poking-holes-in-partners-condoms/a-61689670 Germany might disagree with you.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 06:06 PM
6

There was sexual penetration without consent. -> consent was no longer there the second she took the condom off without consent.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 06:05 PM
6

Legally maybe not defined as rape, morally: IT IS RAPE.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 06:04 PM
2

Read the first sentence of this post again: I know this might not apply to everyone especially if you want kids or aren’t done having kids
/r/MensRights26/05/24 09:05 AM
1

https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8446
/r/MensRights26/05/24 09:02 AM
1

Yes, but iirc you upped your absolute risk by 0.5% (While the relative risk is +100%)
/r/MensRights26/05/24 09:01 AM
2

Not 100% sure yet, but then again ... I don't want my life ruined either ...
/r/MensRights26/05/24 08:59 AM
2

I support equality, not feminism.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 08:54 AM
12

Toxic Masculinity behaviour/reactions/values can hurt men people, the type of masculinity that shuns being emotional, or liking feminine things. Fix that for you.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 08:52 AM
10

Well unless you used an alt account ... your post has been deleted already.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 08:49 AM
6

real feminism It's all feminists until it's no feminists :D Seriously though, if you still call yourself a feminist these days, you aren't a real feminist. Real feminists call themselves egalitarianist.
/r/MensRights26/05/24 08:47 AM
5

Of course not. Fuck people getting raped etc; and fuck the people doing it. The sooner we can correct or incarcerate these people the better. But comparing most men to bears ... that's basically hate speech. I'm also not sure what men vs bear is trying to achieve ? Awareness that there are criminals ? Are you seeking more funding for the police to follow on these cases on these cases and procecute them ?
/r/MensRights24/05/24 03:32 PM
8

We do "get it" we just think it's unacceptable to demonize and entire demography like this. We are sick and tired of being looked at like garbage.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 09:24 AM
1

Not 100% of the bears, had enough of absolutes, even towards bears.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 09:17 AM
3

Try this and otherwise give up: Yes there are too many "bad men" not a lot but enough. But demonizing all men and calling the average man more dangerous then a bear; is unacceptable. If we can't agree on that we have vastly different values and morals.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 09:14 AM
6

Too many sheep basically; and not calling out BS.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 09:03 PM
12

Looks like a woman only seat to me, doesn't look comfortable for a man.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 11:56 AM
12

Keep a secret diary, release when you stop/change profession.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 07:07 PM
6

HR is there to protect the company, so first contact your lawyer.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 08:05 PM
2

Obviously the answer is going to be yes. However with the same rights and obligations (aka: equality). Currently, they don't. I'd rather have them kill conscription all together though.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 10:54 AM
1

War crimes are defined in rules. You could argue that the definition of said rules are abstract, but otherwise they aren't abstract at all.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 09:11 AM
3

It probably IS already a war crime, they just didn't read there own text good enough. Everything hinges on considering "civilians" and "militants" 2 distinct things, but they are BOTH humans !
/r/MensRights16/05/24 09:09 AM
1

Disclaimer: joke and only applies to some people you don't want in your car: Bear, nobody would blame you if you kicked the bear out, or pulled over to the side of the road.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 10:26 PM
1

Unless it's not admissible if illegal, do it anyway.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 09:52 PM
2

Problem is an apology doesn't cut it. Anyone who would go there ... it's bad.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 09:51 PM
1

If you don't come to court or go to jail ... you can bet your ass some physical assault is going to take place.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 09:50 PM
1

Both royally fuck you over. If I know I would be found guilty : rape hands down.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 09:49 PM
5

Fuck that, cut her out now, this is unacceptable behaviour.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 09:48 PM
2

Honestly ? I'd properly prefer the abuse of a single sick person, then being chastised and locked away for years (falsely accused). They both take your freedom and dignity, but only one is for a verrry long time.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 09:45 PM
19

And this ladies and gentlemen, is how rape claims will not be taken serious in the future. Girl who cried wolf...
/r/MensRights13/05/24 09:48 AM
1

Don't worry, use the reaction as an information gift. She get mad and cancel ? All you need to know.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 06:25 AM
1

Anecdotal: for myself I have noticed: loved men (who then in turn have something to love) are more productive ; generally we aren't loved, and their isn't much to gain from work ; and we are practical so we don't work.
/r/MensRights11/05/24 06:16 AM
1

Hitting down and up is in itself a stupid concept. (It places one human or group above or below another.)
/r/MensRights11/05/24 06:06 AM
8

Ok the short version: We get drafted For the same crime, we get harder sentences Bias in family court Receive poorer grades in school for same work Significanty higer homelessness without empaty for it.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 10:21 AM
0

Fair, but just hit your favourite search engine on this subject, if you find a study that says it's better to stay in a dysfunctional marrage, give a shout. https://wendihill.weebly.com/research-paper.html
/r/MensRights05/05/24 10:19 PM
6

Consider this: Parents who are using all there energy to stay afloat in a bad relationship, how much are they going to contribute to a healthy upbringing ?
/r/MensRights05/05/24 08:30 PM
-1

Sorry keep finding results/studies that say your opinion is nonsense, the following link lists 2 studies. https://www.richrochlinlaw.com/is-it-better-to-stay-in-an-unhappy-marriage-for-your-kids-or-file-for-divorce/
/r/MensRights05/05/24 08:29 PM
13

Separated happy parent's are better then unloving household with non-happy parents.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 05:43 PM
2

I do miss intimacy though, but the sex part is optional ^.^
/r/MensRights05/05/24 05:38 PM
2

One for the list: These days it's easier then in the past to flee the country all together, so fertility doesn't matter anymore.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 09:44 AM
34

What’s with this? Basically covert dehumanisation. But they can't quite admit that to themselves so excuses it is.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 07:44 AM
4

Well the egg's left, and probably aren't coming back anyway...
/r/MensRights05/04/24 05:58 PM
2

Do not forget the agreeableness bell-curve, and thus also aggression. The vast majority of violent crimes are committed by the most extreme outliers. And you find more men at this extreme. Ergo the result is "men did it".
/r/MensRights03/04/24 10:14 PM
9

Yes we are looking at RAPID population decline actually. Which ALSO has issues.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 08:05 PM
1

TinMan had a post on this. But I couldn't verify his numbers.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 10:28 AM
9

Anyone asking this doesn't understand how most men work. Give him a realistic bone to chase, and he will to the ends of the earth. But we are also very practical and don't bother if it's not achievable.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 10:26 AM
5

There is no reason NOT the have them, so I'd say yes.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 11:12 AM
2

Report OR talk about it, hence it would influence this question, because you might just not know about it.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 08:27 AM
0

Only with lesbians friends.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 08:26 AM
2

Anecdotal from EU : yes? they tried to help when things affected you enough and started to act out. Problem is, the damage was already done the years before. So yes, but to little to late.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 08:24 AM
1

Men can be more bossy without coming across abnormally?? https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Overlapping-distributions-of-Agreeableness-for-men-and-women-Vertical-axis-indicates_fig10_51594567 There you go: the distribution. But nobody should feel annoyed when you meet anybody outside the norm. Unfortunately: humans on average tend to be annoyed when the meet somebody outside the norm.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 08:14 AM
1

Men are respected more?? See: Rumour
/r/MensRights14/03/24 08:10 AM
1

Wasn't making any claims on who has it worst see: But playing victim Olympics, hasn't won anyone prices. Ok maybe it has with feminism, but it's still a toxic way to go about things: Everyone's struggles are valid, even if someone else has it worse. Everything is worth fixing if possible/reasonable, naturally of course you want to fix the worst problems first.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 08:09 AM
1

Double edged sword : we don't have to carry your baby for 9 months ; downside you can't. Physically stronger on average. ... ? Not going to keep listing, see below. But reading your post below, you are looking for societal pro's. In which case ... yea there aren't going to many or by any big extend. So societal ones: Rumour: men are listened/respected to more ( in job environments ) double-edged: you don't get attention from the opposite sex (net negative if you ask me) you can be slightly more …
/r/MensRights13/03/24 11:15 PM
1

There is male privilege, there is female privilege. But there are also male issues, female issues, and plane human issues. Who has it worst of best ? depends on the weight of your metrics. But playing victim Olympics, hasn't won anyone prices.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 11:43 PM
10

TLDR / TLDL : got the summary of which specif area they are referring to ?
/r/MensRights09/03/24 11:27 AM
4

Can't that lawsuit be used 2 ways ? (It should in any case.)
/r/MensRights08/03/24 06:14 AM
2

We don't need more mouths to talk perse, we need more ears willing to listen.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 06:10 AM
1

Should expand it then and make it THE new catchphrase. “my body, my choice, my responsibility”
/r/MensRights06/03/24 10:10 PM
3

US woman are going to have a meltdown ^.^ (Since sadly in some/?all? places in the US you cannot get an abortion now.)
/r/MensRights03/03/24 08:35 AM
2

Oh wait, I also forgot mammary glands. We actually have them, they just aren't developed, if they do it's called gynecomastia.
/r/MensRights27/02/24 11:02 AM
7

and she is a feminist Feminist or equalist ?
/r/MensRights27/02/24 09:41 AM
3

Gender neutral laws aren't a thing, because the people pushing them forward do not really care about gender neutral laws, or they would make gender neutral laws. That simple if you ask me.
/r/MensRights26/02/24 07:23 PM
1

In 20years, same headline, enjoy your wait.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 10:45 PM
5

You made a logic error on your Lesbian thinking, I think : The factor here is sexual orientation, not gender. You'd need to be looking at gay relationships for heightism.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 06:49 AM
1

I do not blame them for it Why not ?
/r/MensRights21/02/24 10:14 AM
2

Fuck cancel culture, doesn't matter what gender or race. Victims (and criminals) need a fair trial that's all ! If we want cancel culture, we could just kill courts altogether, and go back to vigilanti justice.
/r/MensRights21/02/24 07:51 AM
3

Me too, i'd bail, or at the least definitly fall out of love.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 04:22 PM
5

FYI iirc you can create a sub fairly easily. Just make sure you keep modderating it :)
/r/MensRights16/02/24 10:25 AM
7

Try making a pie-graph, step by step: Picture 1: 24 620 Deaths : 1 circle - 100% Picture 2: 1 slice: 10 000 infants. Picture 3: 2 slices: 10 000 infants & 16000 woman Picture 4: 3 slices: infants, woman, QuestionMark : Who is the rest, things ?!? Picture 5: "It's men, why do we disregard the suffering of men ?" ​ I suspect that would be more impactfull ?
/r/MensRights13/02/24 05:04 PM
6

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful\_effect
/r/MensRights13/02/24 02:46 PM
3

I have seen many people take long hair, bundle it up, and you can't tell they have long hair, until they untie their hair. Is that an avenue that can work ?
/r/MensRights13/02/24 11:33 AM
5

Men are more at risk for homelessness (see statistics). I suspect being young does not exclude you from this risk. As such, no need to ask the question if it's true or not.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 09:09 AM
4

Hmm this is going to depend on the person I suspect, often people know themselves what that means for them. But something that involves: being able to stand on your own. This could be travelling, moving out, achieving something. Something that makes you seen. Something that makes you feel accepted, ... Depends on the "boy"; what is it that this person need to feel "complete" as a person ?
/r/MensRights13/02/24 09:07 AM
3

HMm personally I am missing references to laws that are biased, wouldn't this strongly help your case ?
/r/MensRights13/02/24 09:03 AM
1

Yes this trips me up every time a friend asks me who I find beautiful, I always have to translate it to attractive, as they are framing it in a dating context.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 01:09 PM
7

Thank you, keep repeating yourself, and if I ever get into an argument I will most definitely bring up your page as reference !
/r/MensRights09/02/24 01:06 PM
221

Tips: record everything or have a third party present at all times when you around your wife. Marriage counselling will not work when 1 party is in bad faith (your wife). Good luck.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 09:33 PM
2

no ACT should entail more then that, but it depends a lot on how much connection there is between your cognitive brain and other parts. But I suspect it's partially dead.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 07:31 PM
2

Community you get by interacting with people over time. It's the hardest one to build. Sense of who you are: explore and find out. Do you feel like you need something specific to find that out ?
/r/MensRights08/02/24 07:28 PM
1

Issue is the things I would love to do, I feel I would be too old to do once I get that nice cushy job and a place I can call home. I am open to being wrong ofc That's a great starting point, what would you like to do ?
/r/MensRights08/02/24 07:13 PM
2

What is wrong with just A and B ? What do you feel like you are missing in your life ?
/r/MensRights08/02/24 07:12 PM
2

ACT -> How do you feel about alternative therapies ? (You can pick your own level of bs/mystical level, I try to stay as close as possible to science, but I am also familiar with less scientific things.)
/r/MensRights08/02/24 07:11 PM
3

In this regard, you can also try other things, oxytocin for me is a very high motivator.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 06:28 PM
3

Sure, that's also why I asked. Paragraph 1: You feel regret, you also aim for "success". But for that you probably first need to look up what success means to you. But from your personal desires, and not what the rest of the world views as success. Your actual desires can steer success, because then there is motivation. "I was never that eager dreamer" → Usually because your environment killed it. Good luck on damage control, doing the same here ;). Paragraph 3: Sounds like you feel the need for…
/r/MensRights08/02/24 06:18 PM
4

In between the lines I can read goals, values and desires. But at first sight you seem no to be aware of them. Shall I list them, or shall you as practise ?
/r/MensRights08/02/24 05:56 PM
6

To bad, if it was up to me, my "remove the gender if possible" should be a law.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 02:58 PM
8

Which part would you like to specifically fight ? I really roughly really shortly skimmed parts of it, my biggest beef is: why is this gendered ? Where did the equality go ?
/r/MensRights08/02/24 02:56 PM
11

I have said it before and I will say it again: any law or directive you write, remove the gender if possible without causing undesired side-effect. Case in point: Article 6 Female genital mutilation Member States shall ensure that the following intentional conduct is punishable as a criminal offence: (a)excising, infibulating or performing any other mutilation to the whole or any part of the labia majora, labia minora or clitoris; (b)coercing or procuring a woman or a girl to undergo any of the …
/r/MensRights08/02/24 02:42 PM
7

FIRST rule of gun safety: treat all guns as if they are loaded
/r/MensRights07/02/24 01:45 PM
23

Truth of the matter is, they are being a menace to you ! NOT the other way around.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 07:29 AM
2

By that logic everyone who plays the lottery is privileged because they MIGHT win.
/r/MensRights07/02/24 07:28 AM
4

I sure see my 30 to 40 year old friends getting in a bit of a panic.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 11:23 PM
4

So the male privilege having a chance to be an at outlier and having sociopaths tendencies with a lot of luck ?
/r/MensRights06/02/24 11:22 PM
1

Having the need for your partner to trust you to some extend is fine, you'd good. Also depends on how long you have been together I suppose ?
/r/MensRights06/02/24 10:31 PM
6

Male privilege kind of exist...it's experienced by 0'0001% of men out there Then I highly doubt it's related to being male.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 10:24 PM
19

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation <= this is a thing in most countries, check your local law. Also save/backup all communication.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 10:18 PM
5

If that is one of their believes, you can indicate the fallacy of this reasoning. If they can't see that do not waste your breath, a wall would be more comfortable to talk to.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 03:36 PM
5

Might not create actual change now : but it's still free publicity (and not the paint in a bad light publicity). Also what is really good is : now they have to admit neglect, witch is the first step in fixing a wrongs : admitting guilt.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 09:58 AM
1

Personally I have experienced this as an instinct somehow. Both internal and external. I have a harder time enjoying some things with men, purely because they are men. I have gotten better at ignoring this instinct, but it is still there. It's probably related to this discrimination I suspect; though I do not know what it is.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 09:29 AM
10

Both terms are used to demean/lower the value of the person. Only the intensity and period is different. As such, they are both wrong for the same reasons. (Within reason.)
/r/MensRights06/02/24 09:21 AM
1

other women get offended or someone reminds everyone that it is a form of prostitution and that offends them. Then I don't get how the no-50-50 expectation havers do not offends themselves.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 09:15 AM
3

Drugs always damage the body. Addiction ruins countless lifes. Sounds like you blame the drugs most, rather then the user ? FYI: Alcohol is a hard drug, yet softer drugs are illegal ?
/r/MensRights05/02/24 02:23 PM
4

For me it's Not MRA related: get therapy, your parent's suck (when it comes to emotional value)
/r/MensRights05/02/24 11:59 AM
1

:sad: they probably say the opposite, they are going to focus on their career so they can get married :sad:
/r/MensRights05/02/24 09:37 AM
3

Yes no actual abortion also means no fiscal abortion rights imho. Bit of a package deal. Could still talk about the "drop off" rights.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 09:57 PM
2

I don't want rights for men, I want equality. The only rights that can differ between the sexes would be reproductive rights due to obvious reasons.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 09:55 PM
1

Who downvotes this ? I don't want kids, but if you want them, I still think raising a family is one of the amazing things someone can do. Not for me though, because I don't operate like that.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 09:53 PM
3

IIRC you also need to file for kidnapping, but check local laws.
/r/MensRights04/02/24 09:50 PM
9

I would never prioritize career over my social life. I don't know why people do this. (Other then to survive.)
/r/MensRights04/02/24 10:23 AM
9

They'll mention how they deserve a better guy than you. If your "friends" think this of you, perhaps they aren't _actually_ your friends. I would date all my friends if I was romantically attracted to them and had the right gender. They might not be compatible, but I don't think of any that "I deserve better".
/r/MensRights03/02/24 08:53 PM
3

You think it feels nice after the anaesthetic wears of ?!? They will still suffer.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 05:56 PM
4

I don't think I have a cognitive definition of masculinity. I only have feelings (evolutionary, reproductive feelings) that associate a person with being a specific gender. But if I had to stick something on it: the above.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 02:24 PM
9

When does psychological trauma actually occur? It's often not going to be psychological trauma, but more an emotional programming trauma. It occurs straight after or during DURING the procedure, this child is getting extra pain in their life, and HOPEFULLY their parents are there to provide comfort. But can't be sure of that: what loving parent circumcises their child.
/r/MensRights03/02/24 08:10 AM
20

Despite the name calling, despite incel slander, despite being called a misogynist, despite all of these things, I shower my soon to be wife with love and protection. Lets have a mental health talk, I am a little worried about it ...
/r/MensRights02/02/24 06:56 AM
1

They only carry you this far. It does start to eat after a while, can't beat biology.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 06:04 PM
23

I always found that idea fischy, there is proof now.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 05:59 PM
6

Told me until I was honest she couldn't help me. O wow that is sooo dismissive on so many multiple levels !
/r/MensRights30/01/24 09:19 AM
2

Sorry I read the therapists website / intro text; not a single one was to my like-ing, too much floaty-energetic-do-goody-bs on all of them.
/r/MensRights30/01/24 09:19 AM
3

Define oppressed. Without your specific definition I would say: Some would have been by emotionally unhealthy husbands. Some would have been that wanted to live a dramatically different life, but society didn't let them (in an active oppressive way). ​ I think a more factual word for the situation would be suppressed, not oppressed.
/r/MensRights30/01/24 09:16 AM
7

I don't care about the gender of someone being an ***, should we call them out sure. Are we responsible to do so ? Not really, nobody is responsible for others (adult) people's behaviour.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 06:11 PM
1

I have learned that usually the anyone in the top of anything ... has issues; be it straight up sociopaths to your workaholic.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 07:02 AM
50

Women didn’t buy it. O they ARE buying it! But it's less obvious it's sex (think 50 shades of grey, sex in the city, ...) ​ But since I haven't seen much commercials aimed at woman, I can't tell if they are using that in their marketing.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 06:59 AM
4

You aren't wrong, but either you threat everyone the same, or you don't.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 01:47 PM
1

That's a solution to a problem, i'm just not sure what exact problem you are having.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 01:45 PM
2

You will need to be more specific to what itch you want to scratch then. Sexuality has many components to it.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 01:39 PM
22

Yea if you see hate, avoid that medium. Constant bad input is hard to cope with.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 01:35 PM
3

If you are hungry you eat. You only go on a diet if you need to loose weight. If you have sexual energies ... you do something. Do you need to diet on your sexual appetite ?
/r/MensRights27/01/24 01:34 PM
4

Is it me, or does this graph correlate to x-the wave feminism ? (To one that goes beyond equality.)
/r/MensRights27/01/24 08:38 AM
1

hm ?
/r/MensRights27/01/24 08:37 AM
3

Yep if they aren't listening to our demands/wishes, I don't need to hear theirs either.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 09:27 PM
1

Good argument but not complete, see OppositeBeautiful601's take.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 09:16 PM
35

If you have Instagram check TheTinMen , it has loads of things that you will have to endure. Also maybe get a copy of "Self-Made Man, Norah Vincent" it's a woman who writes about the experience of being a man.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 07:03 PM
6

Please, you also need to think about baby It's not his baby, this baby just happen to have 50% of his stolen DNA. Might as well care about any other random baby. ​ The baby is the mothers problem first, and otherwise society they can find the baby a foster home. He has no responsibilities morally.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 06:56 PM
2

File rape complaint ?
/r/MensRights23/01/24 06:53 PM
1

That might be great for some men, but I need my intimacy. I will turn down one night stand with person A for intimate hugging with person B. And I am not even interested in sex when the opposite party isn't feeling it today even if she would.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 09:43 AM
3

Silver bullet ?
/r/MensRights22/01/24 07:56 AM
10

Thank you, saved the post.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 08:41 PM
1

People got mad and made their own alchohol.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 08:15 AM
23

She probably shouldn't have done that, but rape is a faaar to harsh qualifier. ​ Also if you ask me : consent is nice and all that, but it also takes a way from intuitive and physical connections and interactions.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 11:36 AM
1

Fair, but there are many more laws that have the same issue, yet we also have these and people still get convicted for them.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 09:43 AM
5

Have to have a reason, but in this economic, social, policy, ... environment, who would want to ?
/r/MensRights19/01/24 09:20 AM
73

They are acting like it's a fucking prison, it's a SHELTER, MY GOD ! The bias in these people is crazy.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 10:24 PM
3

"""I'm sorry that this is a risk, I wish it wasn't but we live in a world that isn't perfect. But don't be afraid, men get assault far more often, so statically you will be fine.""" ​ That being said, it's not safe to say no to a woman either ;) Ask me how I know.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 08:16 AM
16

"Man up" is nothing short of a shaming tactic, remove these people from your life and call them out on their BS.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 12:53 PM
1

retaliating sure, but not mutilation ...
/r/MensRights09/01/24 09:16 AM
1

Not even oooohhhh is justified. As 1 is being a serious ass-hole and probably causing quite some damages, and potentially giving some temporary breathing problems. ​ The other is disfiguring a person ...
/r/MensRights09/01/24 09:15 AM
2

Condescending attitude, and consequences are for courts to give, not your own vigilante justice.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 09:14 AM
-1

If you scare someone holding a boiling pot of water, sure, This ? This assault with intend to harm, period. Jail please !
/r/MensRights09/01/24 09:12 AM
3

No and it's a good question, the answer will be : he wants non-conditional love, so he has to ditch anyone who only offers conditional love. But it can be a pain in the ass to find someone who want's/doesn't care about non-superficial things.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 07:48 AM
1

It generally takes a lot for men to protest, it must be real bad.
/r/MensRights23/12/23 10:50 PM
27

And to add satire addendum to this ;) : the bar is that low...
/r/MensRights23/12/23 03:55 PM
63

Why do some people here like Jordan Peterson so much? Don't think it's complicated, you said it yourself: he recognizes men's problems, he cares for men and tries to help,
/r/MensRights23/12/23 01:31 PM
2

When it's a minority of people who commit violent crimes, you only need to nudge the bell-curves a tiny bit between genders to get a massive difference in absolute numbers. So though technically corrects, it's a grossly incorrect way to look at it.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 10:06 PM
7

Either you want to "adopt" or not, however you aren't legally adopting, so it's a risk. With a low divorce rate, this risk of loosing your "adopted" child is low. But with less stable relationships comes more risk of loosing that child, and thus this becomes a significant emotional risk.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 07:49 PM
1

Condoms have failure rates ... otherwise we (shoudn't) need abortions either.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 03:12 PM
23

Only after we have enough older women telling the results of what the toxic balance creates now.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 11:40 AM
3

Can't reason with the unreasonable, take as much distance as you can.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 11:37 AM
5

The irony of posting this on internal men's day ...
/r/MensRights20/11/23 09:27 AM
11

You might love her but GTFO before you get to love her from jail.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 09:21 AM
7

Nea she needs a wakeup call, for you, and her kids. And you might still need this trial to ensure your legal safety long term. You might be able to plea the court to be lenient on her as to not fuck over your lives, as this benefits not her, not the kids, not you, and not even the state/society.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 09:19 AM
7

As if quota's don't force companies to hire non-qualified people and just end up having useless employees... Dirty jobs could also hire them, and not have them do anything. Same result, equally crappy.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 07:51 PM
1

My advice, no-contact as soon as possible. I smell more toxicity that is seeping into your life, and affecting your emotional and psychological well-being.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 11:07 AM
7

People seem to forget the fucking awesome films with female leads. That's because a good film isn't just based on gender; gender is just part of the lead. As such _we don't notice_ the gender, because it didn't matter.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 11:05 AM
4

If you are having children with someone, I assume you vetted the partner. If you relationship then fails, you are also at fault, you didn't pick and verify well.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 08:31 PM
1

If it's legal and reasonable to download. Then there are good options: searching, or feeding it to GPT/AI.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 08:24 PM
3

Being listened to Being dismissed Being taken serious/respected
/r/MensRights25/10/23 10:36 PM
7

Not even ideologically, just as a human being as a whole.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 11:44 AM
4

Not sure what it would cost to run one, and would people use it ? There are also regulations you probably have to adhere to, which suuuuucks and would turn it into a full-time job.
/r/MensRights23/10/23 07:47 AM
1

to the point he’s confident Tell me how :)
/r/MensRights22/10/23 10:01 AM
2

Think it is a repost, but it's crazy indeed.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 07:47 AM
1

You still draft them, and if they aren't fit for duty you reject them. A lot of woman would fail, but then we rejected them because they coudn't do the job. Not because we didn't hold them to the same standards, including the draft.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 10:15 PM
2

Looked at the "report", it's more like an long article, with no data.
/r/MensRights14/10/23 04:45 PM
1

Either it's the top comment or only comment (I don't know how Twitter works these days) But Pearl is not having it :D
/r/MensRights11/10/23 09:26 AM
5

Traditionally, patriarchy was perceived to be the rule of a man in a family. However, the term is now explanatory of all male-dominated social systems Quite hard to have a conversation when people keep changing the definition of word, caused by people using a word in a incorrect way. Pushing an incorrect narrative. And now we are updating the dictionaries to match the incorrect usage of said word. And now we have a poorly defined meaning of the word patriarchy. Utterly ridiculous if you ask me.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 12:30 PM
4

patriarchal society The what ?
/r/MensRights09/10/23 10:23 AM
2

Now even pieces of metal are sexist in who they kill ! /s (Yes they are operated by people, but I assume your gender does not affect how often you get ran into, except behavioural differences of the one on the bike. Using lights, looking out for your own safety ... )
/r/MensRights06/10/23 07:50 AM
1

Skimmed the comments 2 tips I didn't see, that might help: Add other stimulation that turns you on, like kissing ? being touched somewhere ? ... add it to mix in order to heighten your feeling of arousal. When masturbating, masturbate in a way that feels as close as possible to the intercourse. Come like that and don't cheat by using your normal masturbation methods.
/r/MenSupportMen02/10/23 08:51 PM
3

That would be a human right violation ... 13° ... actually it already is ?
/r/MensRights23/09/23 10:06 AM
10

I'd like my value not to be reduced to my genitalia, thank you !
/r/MensRights23/09/23 10:02 AM
5

You still can't grantee the mother will accept the fetus extraction. As such this doesn't solve much in this area. It would however make it possible for them to "abort" their pregnancy and keep the live (for pro-life people) ; but who will be responsible then ? Unless adoption is an option you will still have a child. (Mother and/or father.)
/r/MensRights20/09/23 06:03 PM
5

Report to HR that you saw an interaction between a female and a male coworker, and the male coworker didn't take no for an answer. Get their disaproval of that situation in text. They will want details, then tell actual version, after you got that disaproval.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 05:30 PM
1

A tiny minority commit violent crimes. Where do you find these people ? At the extremes. Which gender is most likely to be at the extreme end ? Men as such "men are the blame" /s.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 09:04 PM
3

No no DO NOT screw them, bad plan they don't even deserve screwing by men.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 05:49 AM
2

Anecdotal / personally I haven't a SINGLE men in my life complain they didn't get enough sex. ... woman on the other hand ...
/r/MensRights13/09/23 06:32 AM
7

Isolation cells are considered torture, should say enough on who deserves to be lonely ... (hint: nobody)
/r/MensRights12/09/23 12:16 PM
1

I think I'd just reply with: "How do I know _YOU_ aren't a serial killer ? :D"
/r/MensRights11/09/23 07:53 AM
9

Fair question: unverified numbers: https://couplesacademy.org/infidelity-statistics/
/r/MensRights25/08/23 10:03 AM
2

https://en.chessbase.com/post/explaining-male-predominance-in-chess Check the bell curve, their is a clear shift, the amount of players probably doesn't matter ?
/r/MensRights19/08/23 10:50 AM
1

Yet biology still factually seems to matter, even though we don't want it to.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 10:48 AM
1

Devils advocate: what if is about physicality ? Brain physicality ?
/r/MensRights19/08/23 10:40 AM
2

Still unfair as your rules include gender.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 08:22 PM
2

Cutting ties with your family is not to hard , .... if you have been raised properly/emotionally healthy. Because you would not tolerate this shit and respect yourself before others. But in this probably **** situation, we can expect the OP the have codependent tendencies. At least that is what I believe.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 06:18 AM
3

Tell her that she has to treat you with respect or she will not be able to have contact with you. Boundaries are in order here. ​ And do this over text or record, cause of smear campaigns.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 06:13 AM
40

Ok you frozen your eggs, not what, waiting longer would make an "equal male" appear ? Does anyone have "equal male" restoration plan ? Doesn't sound like a very well thought out plan to me.
/r/MensRights19/07/23 04:02 PM
1

Yes not sure how to do it better.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 09:00 PM
4

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/14zjdj9/comment/jrz2dnx/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3
/r/MensRights14/07/23 07:22 PM
8

Source of paper: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21937122/ Source of slides: https://www.instagram.com/p/CuovauLtttL/?img\_index=1
/r/MensRights14/07/23 07:22 PM
1

Who defines hate speech ? There are some definitions I could accept, but generally: see above. (Like call to violence.)
/r/MensRights08/07/23 08:45 PM
11

A lot of those shitposts need decent debate and corrections.Kae is clearly a misandrist though, or at the least out to antagonise people. Blocked said person while I was at it.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 08:07 AM
7

The FB post, it's :rolleyes: but nothing to crazy. The comments, some are :biggrolleyes: and a few are actual hatespeech.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 07:54 AM
5

A lot of is is bordering, but definitely has misandry fuelled posts. I'd need to comment on them to "escalate" their viewpoint to something unacceptable to then report that.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 07:22 AM
1

Problem isn't the law; it's the law + Indian's courts / guilty unless proven otherwise.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 06:04 PM
1

If you don't feel like the school takes proper action, then people should alays escalete to the police.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 12:07 PM
5

Maybe not as bad, but I also see it.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 08:34 PM
14

In war, not everything is about combat, IIRC most of the personal are in logistics and support. So I don't see any reason not to include all genders.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 07:56 AM
2

Skip the bot, make a dating app that just figures out a date and place of people you might match with.
/r/MenSupportMen27/06/23 10:24 AM
2

Reminds me of this: https://thevarsity.ca/2017/10/08/jordan-peterson-i-dont-think-that-men-can-control-crazy-women/
/r/MensRights22/06/23 05:23 PM
1

I actually can't complain, I have some good friends ... I'm just happy when they complement who I am and not what I can provide.
/r/MensRights03/06/23 10:31 AM
1

Sure we can't block them from doing it , but it's really off-putting ; and makes me loose a LOT of respect / interest in them as friends or as romantic partners.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 07:02 AM
1

Anecdotal evidence: yes around age 35
/r/MensRights30/05/23 11:30 AM
1

Because the S stand's for superior and thus better. /s /troll
/r/MensRights10/05/23 09:57 AM
3

unless a well written certified deal That's even likely to not protect you.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 06:13 AM
1

Fair you need to be "I would marry you with shared resources; and trust you would never screw me over." kind of confidence in the mother.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 06:11 AM
1

If you have money to burn: not a lot of risk. If you want to keep all of your money, or not loose any: maybe reconsider.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 06:08 AM
5

All those tonns are to there to propell a relativly small mass into space. Rockets only put between 2.2 and 7% of their mass into space. And to your other comments: yes compared to payload, humans are light.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 06:02 AM
5

As in females are physically smaller On average.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 05:58 AM
1

Why do I also have a gut feeling the latter might also be more willing to go on these missions ?
/r/MensRights06/05/23 05:59 AM
2

I don't care, but I would point out the hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 05:56 AM
4

https://realitycalc.com/ There is it seems. But for men, you basically open all sliders almost all the way.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 05:53 AM
6

"exclude obese" as anti fat. They aren't perse, but it's in there because people will click the box. :rolf: So who-ever clicks the box is "anti-fat".
/r/MensRights06/05/23 05:48 AM
2

Yes I have seen it. Read and then skimmed the article after it got really boring and repetitive. Yes the calculator interface is politically collected. ​ However the data used in it is factual to my knowledge. ​ I'm not sure what she is arguing for or about. It feels avoidy of what this calculator is supposed to inform people about: some standards are unrealistic. But yes the catlady shaming serves no purpose other then to shame. Which I would reply to with "buzz of with your shaming".
/r/MensRights06/05/23 05:47 AM
3

i should finally get laid so i stop this attitude" This "friend" does not respect you, I advise you to reduce or remove contact.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 02:09 PM
7

If you want to play dirty: if I only play with our clitoris is it rape And don't forget your clit also becomes erect ! ​ Other then that I also advise going NC with this person. This person hold unacceptable values you don't want to be around these people.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 01:57 PM
1

Odd, rules must be different per GEO location, I can see it without logging in.
/r/PussyPass24/04/23 07:08 AM
2

Contact your real friends first, before the smear campaign starts.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 08:49 PM
1

You don't know how rudely I would like to reply to this.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 08:48 PM
1

Screwing in this case doesn't mean literally screwed. But creating an non-optimal situation.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 07:58 PM
1

Not in the USA, but I suspect if you search on how to request child support it will be easier to find. From there you can probably find where to request the opposite.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 07:08 PM
1

In this case I was using husband/wife as a synonym to desired significant other.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 07:07 PM
1

Court, as child support is court ordered iirc only they can revoke it IANAL
/r/MensRights19/04/23 04:10 PM
0

Nowadays, they have BILLIONS of men to choose from. + In the past, it seemed like every guy had a wife. ​ Also means they don't have a husband ... so they are also screwing themselves. It's all really confusing to me. Edit: *In this case I was using husband/wife as a synonym to desired significant other.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 04:03 PM
1

nocensor ... <deleted>
/r/MensRights12/04/23 04:52 PM
1

Didn't woman mostly control the dating scene ?
/r/MensRights12/04/23 04:45 PM
1

What are you saying, what are your goals ? You make some statements, but it's unclear what you do suggest.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 06:36 AM
2

"Invented by gender" for me, is an insult to the inventor: reducing their achievements and works, to their gender.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 06:40 AM
7

That debate group is of REALLY poor quality, they are no learning to debate in that group AT ALL.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 06:25 AM
3

How many 21 year olds heard that, skipped the vaccine, and then killed their grandma with Covid? Except it didn't protect against transmission it helped (63% reduction not elimination). If you wanted to not kill your grandparents, meet them outside, wear masks, make sure you aren't ill (like get a rapid test etc.) But trusting the vaccine as a first protection, is foolish at best.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 12:02 PM
3

Because of non-equality towards men, we get THIS.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 08:53 AM
2

It's not men who reduced this to a piece of paper. These men are just trying to obtain equality.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 08:49 AM
1

IMO we are approaching this in a wrong way, it shouldn't about equality between men and woman, it should be equality between equal-sufferers. Those who are suffering significantly get days off, regardless of the cause. If your cause happens to be gender specific, so be it. The only questions are: Do you need a doctor to sign off on it ? Is there a limit ? What is defined as significantly ?
/r/MensRights01/04/23 08:45 AM
1

Haven't checked the actual law but iirc: "paid medical leave to women suffering from severe period pain" My biggest complaint: why they fuck is this a gendered law ? Anyone suffering from severe pain should not have to work; the cause is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 08:36 AM
1

It's already starting to eat itself ^.^
/r/MensRights20/03/23 11:05 AM
2

Like wtf appraiser ? Not ok ! Do your job appraise the house, not the owners.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 11:18 PM
3

Personally no, but I can name what it is: wokeness / political correctness. Somewhat fed by victemhood, virtue signalling, fear of cancel-culture. They should be about equality, but in reality they are about wokeness and they don't actually care for genuine equality. Fed by several things, reply if you want me to elaborate further as in how and why I speculate this is a thing.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 11:11 PM
12

Been playing with this prompt, i'm not entirely sure chatGPT is "understanding" what is being said.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 07:29 PM
2

There are just toxic traits, some might be more common in a gender, but none are gender specific.
/r/MensRights13/03/23 04:44 PM
2

"fragile masculinity" -> I think of anything you could say this has to be on the top of that list. It's really hyprocritical; but people should abolish both concepts from their mind and vocabuluary.
/r/MensRights13/03/23 04:38 PM
14

I think they meant "practising pedophile". But I am not a newspaper editor, so what do I know.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 07:36 AM
3

Not that I know of, the opposite however might be easier to answer I fear.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 03:52 PM
1

It's about the right to do so. And I support them, even if nobody would do it.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 03:49 PM
2

I love the idea of gender equality day, but let's make it broader and just equality day ! (There are other means to be discriminated against.)
/r/MensRights08/03/23 11:34 PM
8

I'm taking notes this day: looking who celebrates woman's day, but not men's day. I don't mind people celebrating and being proud, but if you only do 1 this feels sexist to me.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 03:13 PM
41

Just wait until child support comes around for a double whammy.
/r/PussyPass03/03/23 10:23 PM
3

Less then perfection is subservience ? That's a stretch. There is still a giants space between these 2 extremes where there are not-perfect but still worthwhile and satisfactory relationships. Perfect is the enemy of good.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 06:47 PM
2

Expecting or only wanting perfection regardless of the subject will set your daughter up for failure. I hope she won't loose to many life-years as an adult dealing with this.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 02:22 PM
1

"economically attractive" Sounds like objectification to a wallet to me.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 02:20 PM
1

Yes nothing would be perfect, and it would always be up to debate. This is where GOOD politics and compromises come in where the chosen government does there best effort to represent the average desire of the country.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 08:51 AM
1

Sorry if you understood that I assumed that was your intention. Men get trapped with women ? How is this related to it ? It's not an individuals responsibility for compassion, but as a society/community. And naturally this should be towards everyone, regardless of gender. Are you hinting at simping ?
/r/MensRights19/02/23 08:48 AM
1

Because in some places we have compassion and want some humanity for people even if it's their own fault. That doesn't mean our patience should be infinite or compassion unconditional. But that's a mindset / value / political issue if you ask me; we could argue this to death, and come to no resolution.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 05:25 PM
1

I should be more precise with my words. Yes laws can also be changed. My point was in the US they neglected to make this a law and count on a precedent for rights.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 10:23 AM
1

It's going to depend on the person which one is worse. But i'd not be surprised if vasectomies turned out to be less impact-full on average then the pill. Luckily they have more options then just the pill to reduce impact.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 08:21 AM
3

It wasn't a law, THAT's why it COULD be overturned; it was a precedent. If someone would have bothered to make it a law, there wouldn't have been an issue.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 08:15 AM
2

The particular leave would only be granted to women who, while having their menstrual cycle, go through a lot of pain because they suffer from certain medical conditions such as endometriosis, ovarian cysts, and others.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 06:19 PM
2

The article states "go through a lot of pain" ; so it's not for "just" menstruation.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 11:29 AM
6

The particular leave would only be granted to women who, while having their menstrual cycle, go through a lot of pain because they suffer from certain medical conditions such as endometriosis, ovarian cysts, and others. Yep, but not sure who started calling it menstrual leave, they should have just called it medical leave. On a sidenote: if this is a permanent problem for your employee, companies should get their employing-disabled-people compensation.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 11:26 AM
1

If it's true or not doesn't matter, because it sound like a red herring, and in general this is just an attempt to slander/demonize all men based on a minority.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 07:56 AM
33

Unfortunately this has also been posted by the UN Woman, as you see it here, without the full context ...
/r/MensRights07/02/23 11:17 PM
1

I can't find the original article or the report, so I am going to assume it's biased reporting from the UN Woman.
/r/PussyPass07/02/23 10:28 PM
5

Yes, reply this: I assume you consider the genders somewhat equal, and not inherently evil. As such you have to conclude either the parents and/or society fails to raise men in a healthy and prosperous matter.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 09:25 PM
3

Unless the father is unfit to parent, why did he only get 25% ?
/r/MensRights01/02/23 09:03 AM
1

FYI check with a lawyer if you have cheap consultation, might be worth it.
/r/MensRights26/01/23 07:45 AM
6

I stopped bothering with en.wikipedia.org ; it's become toxic environment to edit and improve things. There have been people in their field of expertise trying to edit things, and being shot down.
/r/MensRights26/01/23 07:40 AM
78

I don't know why this study was done. But the thing with science: to proof something you need to study it ; even if considered common knowledge. It can also be important to study it over time, to have data of how things evolve. Studies like these legitimize / proof issues; making it easier to debate them and find solutions.
/r/MensRights26/01/23 07:36 AM
14

So it took her 625 dates even for food, to find someone she connected to; or she stopped and didn't find anyone ?
/r/MensRights25/01/23 09:35 AM
21

No part of being red makes it a truck. But your analogy falls apart, as toxic masculinity implies there is toxic behaviour that is specifically male. As if that toxic behaviours cannot exist without the gender. A more apt analogy would be referring to "truck-red ; a red specifically for trucks, that cannot occur anywhere else".
/r/MensRights22/01/23 12:57 PM
20

So which part of the toxic behaviour makes is masculine ?
/r/MensRights22/01/23 11:25 AM
12

There is statistics, and there is associating issues with a gender. We would never accept "poverty blackness" or "toxic blackness"; or any other kind of stereotyping. People have issues, and yes some demography might have more issues. This just informs us where to look at look at, and focus on how to help these people.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 11:23 AM
20

Toxic behaviours exist, they aren't inherently sex related.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 10:14 AM
1

Naturally we cannot force woman to abort. But any parental obligations or expectations should be dismissed; assuming abortion was agreed to beforehand.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 10:30 PM
6

Consent to sex is consent to the possibility of pregnancy, but not parenthood. In most places pregnancy does not grantee parenthood.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 08:01 PM
2

I'm just a little annoyed because I don't know yet if I don't want to have them in the future.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 07:55 PM
3

Yes and they also CASUALLY forget that anti-conception can fail; and then they give more anti-abortion arguments.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 07:54 PM
3

Yes, and even some people on r/childfree can't even agree on that. Really sad the world right now.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 07:48 PM
8

My bad I ,from habit, sorted on controversial. (It's usually how you find decent responses in some places.) So yes, some good ones roll to the top. I wonder why the controversial good ones are still getting so much flack though.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 07:45 PM
19

And misandry runs wild there, my god.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 07:41 PM
14

And some the sane nuanced compansionate replies are still downvoted.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 07:27 PM
26

When sorted by controversial: That's toxic jikes. There is a difference between loneliness and entitledment to a partner. Chee.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 07:22 PM
6

You mean the genders would be swapped, they would loose their shit ? But I can't be mad about these responses, because they seem proportional.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 04:53 PM
5

Yes, what you really want is the polymer/gel for this kind of path. Which can be simply removed by a second injection breaking down the polymer. But it's not available yet.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 06:28 PM
9

In Belgium too recently.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 08:22 AM
8

That is one sad presentation, mostly sad on the ones listening, ... or rather NOT listening.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 11:16 PM
2

Depends, are we not feeling it or withholding on purpose ?
/r/MensRights18/01/23 03:27 PM
2

You do have to ask yourself: do you wish google or a search engine to politically color your search result by manually set rules ? (Assuming google themselves do not put up a banner but it's only concerning search results.)
/r/MensRights16/01/23 05:02 PM
1

The cream rises to the top, Not sure I'd call most people the top cream. But they do possess the qualities (for better of for worse) to be at the top.
/r/MensRights14/01/23 10:39 AM
1

You do know you have 50% of the voting power right ?
/r/MensRights14/01/23 10:36 AM
0

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15491274/ Because it was basically proven, which doesn't make it an assumtion at all.
/r/MensRights14/01/23 10:34 AM
0

Here is literally the definition of patriarchy. a society in which the oldest male is the leader of the family, or a society controlled by men in which they use their power to their own advantage And that is the current definition due to how language evolves. The pure original meaning was: "the rule of the father" from Greek πατριάρχης (patriarkhēs)
/r/MensRights14/01/23 10:30 AM
30

Your thoughts? That if dating apps cared about matching, that they would not insentivise this behaviour.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 07:15 AM
2

Yea that's the issue, I wish there was a better solution ? All of it sucks if you can't come to a natural agreement and trust your bed-fellows.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 10:21 PM
4

To be honest, I personally REALLY do not care about these details. Just rights in this area would be great, I don't need them to be equal, but I want my reproductive rights that do not boil down to vasectomy or bust.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 04:55 PM
4

Under which conditions do you think the father should be able to do this? Within 2 weeks of being notified of the pregnancy and only if it's an accidental pregnancy. (There is of course a lot of he-said she-said issues.)
/r/MensRights10/01/23 04:53 PM
1

Condoms are "easy" to use. However in practise they are only 87% effective per year. (98% on paper) Meaning in 1 year 13 people out of a 100 will have an undesired pregnancy. So in reality you cannot protect yourself (by using condoms) from becoming a parent.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 12:38 PM
2

spermicide Is not verry relible, it can be used as an extra precaution. "testes heater" And the heating is as you said still in testing. ​ So atm mostly 2 options. (Would be nice if there are more though !) But currently I don't feel like we have many good options. (The same for woman, none of their solutions are ideal either.)
/r/MensRights10/01/23 10:39 AM
1

I guess my point was that the initial getting pregnant isn't always 100% the woman's fault I agree
/r/MensRights10/01/23 09:45 AM
3

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/several "some; an amount that is not exact but is fewer than many:" Can you name more then 2 ?
/r/MensRights10/01/23 09:41 AM
1

Well assuming the consent meant no birth control, then yes. Given the context though, I assume birth control was involved in this statement.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 09:38 AM
0

Ok, but after that usually abortion is still an option, bringing you back to 100% in most cases.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 09:37 AM
1

Posted something in childfree; like you'd expect a childfree reddit to understand why someone would want to opt out. But even there you get a lot of downvotes for saying something about paper abortions !
/r/MensRights06/01/23 07:14 AM
30

Leave this abuse relationship. It will only end in more tears. Document and file police reports. If you have real friends also bring them into the leap, before she poisons them.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 09:32 PM
7

Females bully using covert bully tactics. So you kill them their social credit.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 04:14 PM
1

What kind of a reply is this ?
/r/MensRights04/01/23 09:10 AM
14

You don't even need to find someone attractive, or even be attracted to them, to get an erection ...
/r/MensRights03/01/23 02:47 PM
1

They don't even respect them ... ~"friend" recently: "This infection is hurting, if it was a man he would be out."
/r/MensRights03/01/23 02:44 PM
2

But it's not a contraceptive.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 08:51 AM
1

Vasectomy 5% risk of chronic pain ? Where is my gel !?! FFS :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :(
/r/MensRights27/12/22 08:47 AM
2

Within context it's not hateful, it's also not wrong. It's not that woman can't do these jobs, or won't do these jobs. But the matter affect is, if you #killallmen you have some work cut out for you to fill in all those functions and reeducate a lot of woman to fill in these positions. It's an unrealistic and ideological reply, to another one.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 08:15 AM
1

How does anyone self-identify so much with a language to take offence for you insulting a language ?
/r/MensRights26/12/22 08:12 AM
5

Truth is, if all woman would suddenly disappear, we are equally fucked but differently. As there are also many professions mostly filled with woman; but the light will stay on ;).
/r/MensRights26/12/22 08:10 AM
6

is never acceptable to shout down a speaker That percentage is WAAY to low for BOTH genders, wtf.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 08:08 AM
38

How is the US not going on a massive strike for this ? It's one thing to have unfair laws, it's another to make sure you are doomed. Suppose it's one of those: things need to get worse before they get better.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 09:40 PM
21

This could also be related to grading preference and boys falling behind. Maybe they aren't maybe they still are but a little less.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 09:27 PM
1

But I am also not friends with people with double standards, so not much to call out.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 06:18 PM
2

I call out double standards is that enough ?
/r/MensRights25/12/22 06:15 PM
9

I'm sorry, and I don't see how you said anything wrong there.
/r/MensRights25/12/22 12:24 PM
10

Empathy gap.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 09:00 AM
2

Given men consistently receive longer prison sentences for the same crimes, men consistently lose custody, men are more likely to be victims of violent crime than women, men are more likely to be killed at work, and men are almost 100% more likely to be causalities of war. Would it be fair to consider men are often viewed as disposable tools to society ? Yes, it could be argued that men are often viewed as disposable tools to society based on the statistical disparities mentioned. These issues a…
/r/MensRights24/12/22 08:49 AM
4

Not sure, what to say, what would you argue with the chatbot at this point ? -- Been poking the bot with this prompt. The issue seems to be it's identifying men as some men; or men as 1 humongous concept -- But it's still _really_ biased. -- Tried to get it to answer for the individual, I cannot. -- Hmm you might have given let it astray: "how do men" == "find a plausible way to explain"
/r/MensRights24/12/22 08:24 AM
-3

Been a while since I saw a school. But used to be 50/50 I think.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 06:13 PM
15

Either wherever the rape is happening there are a lot of female teachers ... or I see a pattern.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 05:33 PM
10

Maybe, they are probably also more likely to get into this field generally.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 05:33 PM
3

A sweet innocence about the reality of the world. But what is your point ?
/r/MensRights22/12/22 10:16 PM
1

EDIT: Read Perfect_Sir4820 feedback Well you ALWAYS knowingly make accusations. The problem is, the burden of proof still has to be there towards the accuser still, to proof abuse didn't happen.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 04:48 PM
8

https://www.worcesternews.co.uk/news/15888981.man-ridiculed-penis-size-grabbed-woman-crotch/ First example I found with genders swapped. (No jailtime.)
/r/MensRights22/12/22 02:43 PM
12

Naturally one would still need to prove that the allegations are false. It's not because they haven't been found true, that they have the been found false.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 12:34 PM
6

https://ps.psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.ps.201700475 In the seven studies that reported contact rates for inpatient treatment within one year, gender was a significant covariate (p≤.001, τ2=.003), with contact being more common for women (35.0%, CI=30.1%−40.1%) than for men (19.7%, CI=17.3%−22.1%). Woman are doing better, but I don't think the difference is enough to make up for a 4:1 ratio. So to me it feels your conclusion was a bit premature.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 10:59 AM
1

Not sure how THAT could have happened. :facepalm:
/r/MensRights22/12/22 08:50 AM
15

"what's the murderer's gender?" Anyone asking this question has a bias already and is not arguing in good faith. And with their own preconceptions and judgments. I suppose the only valid reply is: I am sorry to hear you are engaging in sexism; judging the vast majority of a demography based on a small percentage. You are no better then racists.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 07:52 AM
1

It might be socially acceptable HOWEVER how 2 people distribute their life-work-child-caring-.... balance/distribution is completely up to them. This is each and everyone responsibility. Nobody (normally) is forcing woman to put their careers on hold. If this is an issue for you, perhaps you need to find a different husband willing to put his career on hold to raise a child.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 11:01 PM
1

https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/4/2/e003644 Don't forget men face rape too !
/r/MensRights21/12/22 10:59 PM
1

https://www.who.int/news/item/09-03-2021-devastatingly-pervasive-1-in-3-women-globally-experience-violence#:~:text=Across%20their%20lifetime%2C%201%20in,unchanged%20over%20the%20past%20decade. This is the source, but it includes regular violence too.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 10:57 PM
1

The original message was deleted, but if I recall correctly you closed with "fuck off". That comes across as "men do not need support".
/r/MensRights21/12/22 10:51 PM
20

Sounds like you dismissing/minimizing problems. You are also heaping all the worlds's problems onto 1 big stack. Can we stop playing victim Olympics and just recognize all affected people and issues are worthy of being looked at ? Yes some people have it worse, yes there are also other real issues, but that doesn't mean these other issues aren't valid or not worthy of any attention.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 05:10 PM
2

If you don't like the down-votes, you might have dropped the /s.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 07:49 AM
4

Formal goodbye -> I agree. If they know I am satisfied ^.^
/r/MensRights21/12/22 07:37 AM
12

Give it a bit, Hollywood will learn due to financial reasons, they are really feeling the economical impact of selling these woke-sandwiches.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 10:38 PM
11

Ditched those wonderful people a year ago. Hope you told them why ?
/r/MensRights20/12/22 10:35 PM
7

Sorry you are dealing with this. But as it's going: this is good, I feel at this point it's going to have to get worse, before it gets better. And the quicker is slides the better. We better have it explode fast, then having is slide really slow and doing faaar more silent damage over time as it's doing now.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 10:30 PM
7

Look here is the issue: 99,... % of men won't act regardless how you dress. (At least for the people I know.) However, there is still this tiny minority of mentally ill people who will act. (Probably even regardless of how you dress.) Should you be allowed to dress however you want ? Sure Is it smart and will you not increase your odds for problem ? Of course not.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 08:02 PM
3

I'm not sure what your message or intend is with the comment. Are you giving me hypothetical instruction, are you giving me instructions, are you asking me to explain it to you ? Or could you elaborate further ?
/r/MensRights17/12/22 11:43 PM
28

In youtubes defense: it's people who watch this more.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 06:32 PM
1

Last I checked "bucket challenge" isn't a job.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 04:17 PM
1

I'm fairly sure the job description did not include this, and this is a voluntary thing I suspect. So what is your point ?
/r/MensRights17/12/22 08:28 AM
1

Issue state : resolved with <Works for me>
/r/MensRights17/12/22 08:22 AM
21

Does she know why she fucked up, and have these issues been resolved ? If not keep that proof of false assault in reserve in case you need it.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 08:20 AM
1

(assuming he was informed) If not all bets are off. If I had to give you a timeframe it would be ["easy" abortion window] - [typical time to notice pregnancy] If you don't tell him until after, to bad his decision window starts now. You can't even do it by "the date he was informed" unless you treat it like serving papers where an officer of the court is involved and a record is kept. If you situation or relationship requires this: sure. You could put the burden on either. Either the woman serve…
/r/MensRights15/12/22 06:29 PM
2

So in this case it's your discomfort VS him becoming a father and being on the hook of child support for 2 decades. I could add some harsh truth to that, but that would just be cruel.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 01:27 PM
4

It didn't work out. To me this read as: The cost (time, money, well-being) of the other abortion methods was to high compared to the already difficult choice.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 01:17 PM
4

I think most here would agree that at week 26; the man (assuming he was informed) has had his chance to opt out of parenthood. For practical reasons men should naturally only be able to reject parenthood at the start of the pregnancy.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 08:32 AM
6

And using AI here is a different answer. (VERIFY because AI is basically a person on psychedelics that sort of knows a lot (but really doesn't), but if he doesn't know will just dream up things instead.) Q: Summarize the paper "Falling Short: On Implicit Biases and the Discrimination of Short Individuals" to 4 paragraphs. A:This paper examines the implicit biases and discrimination of short individuals in the workplace and in everyday life. It begins by discussing the history of heightism, which…
/r/MensRights12/12/22 07:01 AM
8

What you are looking for is page 53: "conclusion"
/r/MensRights12/12/22 06:55 AM
1

I suppose you can share your own DNA test with someone. So if they share it with each other, you can compare it to markers ? That being said what is technically possible: yes do not trust them to be anonymous or keep your data safe.
/r/MensRights11/12/22 09:03 PM
0

It's right there in the comment "whatever their genders". So you either believe the words, or assume xcheshirecatxx is lying.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 08:22 PM
15

In reality it's "woman don't know what it's like not to be believed" these days o.O
/r/MensRights10/12/22 08:19 PM
3

1 and 3 are "in character", as she is being antagonistic. The other ones ... not sure about, I'd need to think about it; but I suspect my answer will be: they didn't need to be there.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 08:18 PM
13

“think of the children’s best interest,” (Assuming abortion, and contraception is legal at your place)Woman had all the options to think of the best interests of the child... by not having it. (And some for the men too, if they didn't ask for contraception.)
/r/MensRights10/12/22 07:11 AM
3

Should I circumcise my daughter if she has a penis? Reply: It is not appropriate for me to provide medical advice, as I am a large language model trained by OpenAI and do not have the necessary knowledge or expertise to give medical advice. Additionally, it is not ethical for a parent to decide to circumcise their child without the child's consent. Circumcision is a personal decision that should be made by the individual when they are old enough to understand the potential benefits and drawbacks…
/r/MensRights09/12/22 09:35 PM
15

Consent principles, meet window.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 01:55 PM
2

Well yes, but with that alimony you can pay her back what she considers to be due :D.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 07:58 AM
24

called sexist by some girls Guess you found the radicals ...
/r/MensRights08/12/22 06:30 PM
13

Am I a bad person for wanting nothing to do with her or the child? Not you are not, the child was born against your will. The more silly equivalent is: if they suddenly rang you doorbell and dropped a random baby in your hands and told you: here you are responsible for it now. It would be kind to take up this burden, but you are under no mortal or ethical obligation to take care of random problems from the world. Hyperbole: I had a one night stand with a woman when I was drunk These days this co…
/r/MensRights07/12/22 10:31 PM
4

Spelling correction error: for romantic interests.
/r/MensRights07/12/22 06:12 PM
6

You have to be smarter :) Try asking for typical attributes that are desirable for aromatic interest.
/r/MensRights07/12/22 05:08 PM
1

Yes because people would interact with the majority (but silent) non misandry/misogyny people.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 07:24 AM
0

Yes, I however don't have any dysphoria nor any gender preference. But there are a few factors that would suit me well to be female. (More flexible collagen, less rules on when it's OK to seek physical contact, probably a few more but they would be hit an miss (like more AND less judgement at the same time), ... )
/r/MensRights05/12/22 09:11 PM
10

While the idea of "male on male" crime is a compelling one Can you help me understand how this idea could ever be compelling ? It's beyond me.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 07:21 PM
8

But I assume sending him that 2000 felt different ?
/r/MensRights04/12/22 08:30 AM
18

The same as "blacks cause their own problems" ; at least society learned that discrimination is bad, but they didn't learn yet that sexism towards men is also wrong.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 08:27 AM
15

What am I missing? A world without cancel culture.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 10:20 PM
2

With some people, when: - My feelings/issues are a burden/inconvenience/nuisance to them. - My desires/wants/needs are incompatible with theirs. It feels very invalidating, and reduces me to my gender. I am actually also considering dropping everyone who would resort to this line of thinking.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 02:21 PM
3

how to get malicious revenge on my accuser I am starting to feel like this is what we SHOULD do however ... :( (Suing falls under this.)
/r/MensRights03/12/22 10:25 AM
3

It IS a stressful job, a friend of mine quit due to this. There is the stress of conflict, so it's not just the typical workload stress.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 10:33 AM
1

Which would imply under-reporting <= this is the winner then. Thank you.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 04:37 PM
1

To lazy to do the math on what that would imply for my numbers. So between 77% and 82% then :)
/r/MensRights01/12/22 04:37 PM
3

So with those 3 hours round trip 3 days a week, would you be working less or more hours ? (Too lazy to do the math.)
/r/MensRights01/12/22 02:12 PM
6

Just do the hours in your contract. If they use you as a work horse, it's not going to get in the way of any promotion or ladder climbing anyway (as there isn't any to begin with).
/r/MensRights01/12/22 02:09 PM
1

You can add to that woman are twice as likely to feel depressed according to some studies. Which would imply under-reporting AND/OR that from the depressed population men make up 82% of intentional self-harm deaths !
/r/MensRights01/12/22 02:07 PM
1

As long as there aren't to many trolls, it makes good practise for real life situations to not get your ass baited.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 11:11 AM
5

Nobody said anything about blame.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 11:05 AM
3

To be fair, it depends on which statistic you bring up in which situation. Either "side" is going to win in some specific area of violence.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 03:18 PM
1

I should have been more careful One flaw here: you have no perfect control here, anti-conception can and does fail. One option that might still work is be really careful with the cycle; and use that as extra birth control.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 12:15 PM
1

Depends on the situation. If you at some point wanted the children and are abandoning them , dude, this is NOT OK. (*With the exception of some extreme circumstances where you suffer unreasonably.) If you became a parent without your consent: I have ZERO moral/ethical reservation unless abortion is illegal.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 12:11 PM
19

If you have the energy to reply, you could reply with some moral and ethical questions. I.e.: You seem to imply that it's acceptable for men to suffer physical assault by a tiny minority of men. Can you explain to me how that is not unfair punishment or judgement on innocent people ?
/r/MensRights30/11/22 12:01 PM
33

- Victim Olympics - Victim blaming by the virtue of being male
/r/MensRights30/11/22 11:48 AM
4

You missed a few gender swaps, and now it's confusing.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 10:44 PM
2

He might be a terrible counselor. ​ he was condescending to the point What do you mean might ?
/r/MenSupportMen29/11/22 11:42 AM
30

That's evil, i'd get this on record, and release it at 18+. But don't let this go unpunished.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 11:19 AM
7

True, but only 1 gender really has all the control, and can verify if what the other side is saying is correct. (With the exception of vasectomy.)
/r/MensRights29/11/22 10:23 AM
9

This, they are each their own persons. Their names shouldn't matter; especially in relationship to your own name.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 10:12 AM
2

You are right, the disease reference was incorrect. However it's STILL illegal, see the law here: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/englisch_stgb.html#p1717
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:17 AM
6

Gender doesn't matter here, impact of the consequences matters.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:04 AM
10

Lying about birth control This IS a GRAVE transgression. Vasectomy isn't a grave one, but still one why: because it doesn't have long term consequences. (Unless someone get's strung along for a significant amount of time.)
/r/MensRights28/11/22 10:42 AM
7

It only becomes a crime when diseases are a concern. https://www.insider.com/germany-woman-guilty-poking-holes-in-condoms-2022-5 Germany would disagree with you.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 10:40 AM
23

Good progress ! I would love to see it everywhere ! And this is what you get (I assume they did) when you write gender neutral laws.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 10:39 AM
15

it becomes rape to lie about having a vasectomy If you plan (at some point) or goal IS to become pregnant then they are "using" you in a way. So yes, though not a grave transgression, it's still a form of rape, because someone is having sex under conditions they didn't agree to.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 10:37 AM
94

she is legally innocent https://www.insider.com/germany-woman-guilty-poking-holes-in-condoms-2022-5 Lukily not always and everywhere
/r/MensRights28/11/22 10:33 AM
8

Legally, probably not (depending on where you live) Morally / ethically / for me: YES
/r/MensRights28/11/22 10:31 AM
1

In googles defensive: are these articles hand picked ? As this reminds me of a AI bot that was trained from internet sources and turned out to be racist or something.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 12:28 PM
1

Depends on a lot and what you agree on. But roughly: you probably want stay at homes to parttake in a part-time job. Unless you are really busy.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 08:15 AM
33

"but women have it way worse" That is such a horrible mindset, I don't think I would accept this. Can't we all just listen to each-others issues, regardless of "who has it worse" ? And for me this is kinda a pink flag for a long term relationship.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 08:12 AM
1

I see some strong believes here and possible trauma. Basically you are looking at therapy work, either by you are a therapist. Hold up the believes shed some light on them, and evaluate and deconstruct them into their parts; and see if they hold up. You might need to go several layers down.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 09:53 PM
15

The OP wants children, but not now (which the mother agreedwith),they are in a bad financial and life situation. And then maybe flame the government for not doing enough, and not the OP, who did his very best not to become a father.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 04:03 PM
-12

4 times, I haven't done the math, but that sounds like a lot ?
/r/MensRights26/11/22 04:00 PM
15

Also should single woman be allowed to use sperm donors then ?
/r/MensRights26/11/22 03:57 PM
20

If you care, you pay via your taxes with a government program to support single mothers who wanted to keep the baby even though having agreed otherwise. OP took his responsibilities. But was thwarted by the mother. It's the mothers choice to have the baby alone.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 03:55 PM
23

This man talked about their wishes for children: they agreed there where none ; she was on birth control AND he was using a condom. Sorry but I agree with the OP, at some point it becomes her responsibility if she deviates from what was agreed to.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 03:43 PM
112

And some are just plain lol, like the condom and goalpost moving: Didn't you wear a condom ? Yes I did. Well ... euu ... still your sperm! Like WTF?
/r/MensRights26/11/22 02:47 PM
28

Think people are finally growing a real moral compass ?
/r/MensRights26/11/22 02:41 PM
1

Little vengeful, and "dragging everybody" down, but I can understand where you are coming from.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 04:42 PM
0

Maybe it would be nice to separate the 2 in 2 subreddit ? Will not happen though I suspect, but could be nice.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 08:22 AM
4

... my opinion on this: how juvenile to expect to be IN love forever. If that is your goal, marriage isn't your thing sorry; because you will most likely need to switch partners to stay IN love.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 10:17 PM
6

This person is blaming current men, for men in the past. I recommend you block them unless you agree the sons should be punished for their fathers sins.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 09:58 PM
3

Often men are even excluded from social groups, simply because they are men and because it makes misandric women "more comfortable". Reminds me of "ladies night".
/r/MensRights14/11/22 11:36 PM
6

Between 50 and 100% higher. Sources: https://jeugdmonitor.cbs.nl/en/node/574 https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/women-and-the-criminal-justice-system-2019/women-and-the-criminal-justice-system-2019 https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/compendium/focusonviolentcrimeandsexualoffences/2015-02-12/chapter1violentcrimeandsexualoffencesoverview
/r/MensRights14/11/22 08:47 AM
3

What is your point ?
/r/MensRights14/11/22 08:37 AM
5

But what is your point ?
/r/MensRights14/11/22 08:36 AM
3

Swap genders in your head during a conversation. Does it feel wrong now ? Speak up.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 08:32 AM
2

If they are right next to each-other, it's reasonable to deduce one of the following: - Men get an extra bathroom - One if for men, the other for the rest. If they are not right next to each-other ... hmm. Other then that, just label them properly, and avoid any discussions about what their goal is. In this case it would be "not men".
/r/MensRights07/11/22 09:04 PM
2

"Woman are paying the price" ? My god, NEXT
/r/MensRights07/11/22 01:49 PM
1

ex-wife or still wife ?
/r/MensRights01/11/22 04:31 PM
2

Ask them to define the terms ?
/r/MensRights01/11/22 04:28 PM
1

If you are no-longer dependent on her; why have patience ? call her out on it.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 05:52 PM
1

These are some serious red flags, sorry man.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 05:51 PM
1

Going to need some proof you aren't attractive :D
/r/MensRights17/10/22 07:47 AM
7

Not ugly, but you have to fix that lens and camera angle, it would benefit no-one to have their picture taken like this. Lighting is also very sub-optimal. Basically the picture is poor (my excuses for being harsh at the person who took it). ​ Hell I can probably half-fix that picture in post removing the distortion. But I don't have a way to send you images on reddit.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 07:39 AM
6

No the best thing for the child is having 2 parents that are willing to support the child both financially and emotionally.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 07:48 AM
12

Depends on your state iirc, but yes. Because if they can't abort, neither should we. And visa versa.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 07:42 AM
9

When abortion is not allowed, then this is fair I agree. When you can abort, it's not fair.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 07:41 AM
8

Someone will pay for that kid, and it shouldn’t be the tax payer. So in that case the only option left is the mother. (Assuming the father doesn't want to.) The choice if the tax payer should pay depends purely on your moral's and value's.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 07:40 AM
17

"Chivalry is not dead" wrong title, the correct title is the one from the researchers: "There is indeed a gender bias in these matters: society perceives harming women as more morally unacceptable" And my reply to that is: having a gender bias on harm IS IMMORAL.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 07:35 AM
9

What is beyond me is: why don't woman buy the cheap "male" version then ? Did they need a law to correct for their lack of finding the best value product ? (Which normally steers the market, and makes this an non issue.)
/r/MensRights14/10/22 11:28 PM
5

Because an actual proper discussion would be the real facepalm ?
/r/MensRights14/10/22 07:23 AM
76

"I am happy to hear that. But legally it is still wrong, and it would feel validating to have this officially recognized and changed in the law, instead of this sword of Damocles above peoples head."
/r/MensRights13/10/22 05:24 PM
4

I don't particularly like owning animals, and it lack the things I look for in companionship.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 04:36 PM
14

Because we all crave companionship, and hope to find someone.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 03:09 PM
26

How do you feel about female circumcision ?
/r/MensRights13/10/22 01:44 PM
13

How do you feel about female circumcision ?
/r/MensRights13/10/22 01:44 PM
33

We are not worrying about your dick. We worry about the unnecessary trauma we put these babies through; and choices that are taken away.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 01:42 PM
2

A ok, I might get the confusion. Last time I checked OXFAM was specifically for "third world" countries, in which case it might still be valid. But you would need to check the details of the campaigns to ensure the concerns are valid for the regions they wish to help with this.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 06:14 AM
4

Probably not available, but i'd look for domestic abuse resources. And ditch your mother after a last talk, "look you either take me serious, or we won't have a relationship long term".
/r/MensRights13/10/22 06:09 AM
3

Not going to read it but thoughts on "i'll cheat on my husband". Then maybe a monogamous relationship wasn't your thing and you should have sought out a partner for polyamory relationships.
/r/MensRights12/10/22 12:01 PM
20

Which rule ?
/r/MensRights12/10/22 11:54 AM
1

Childhood abuse ? Anyhow nobody should get triggered over mislabelling something. (Though IMO you didn't.)
/r/MensRights09/10/22 09:48 PM
3

Maybe something along this topic occurred in their relationship ?
/r/MensRights09/10/22 09:40 PM
0

She has 26 children ?
/r/MensRights09/10/22 09:39 PM
2

If you want a pecking order (and it's not a fucking competition): Transgenders ; Gays ; Lesbians ; Men ; Woman
/r/MensRights09/10/22 09:37 PM
7

Depends on the dictionary you use, but reproductive coercion is a form of rape in my head. If you follow Wikipedia definition, stealthing can be considered rape, and non consented sex is consider rape. And a German judged ruled in your favour that females doing it absolutely illegal: https://www.insider.com/germany-woman-guilty-poking-holes-in-condoms-2022-5#:~:text=A%20German%20court%20found%20a,%2C%22%20according%20to%20Deutsche%20Welle. ​ Specution: OP does the female friend have kids ?
/r/MensRights09/10/22 09:36 PM
17

Some words are not allowed on some platforms, so they use grape instead.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 09:30 PM
1

I can't tell for sure, i'd need to look it up.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 08:18 PM
3

Actually IIRC in Europe some countries already have to import sperm...
/r/MensRights09/10/22 11:33 AM
0

They could. But it's more about the blindness of the issue. Or at least this issue feels ignored in the social fabric. ​ Though where I live we do as much as we can do about safety. Cause if someone has an accident or dies ... my god, you have hell to pay, administration to fill in, safety inspections to pass. They ain't kidding with work safety here.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 10:49 AM
2

Misandry kills men trough suicide and indifference to risk men also face. (More likely to be involved in physical assault, work deaths, war ...) Misogyny has little to do with the few wacko's1 killing people. ​ 1 wacko == mentally i'll people who need a lot of help, institutionalization, ...
/r/MensRights09/10/22 10:42 AM
1

They are half decent forums, if you sort by Controversial :D
/r/MensRights08/10/22 06:01 PM
1

Sorry in the UK meaning: I feel for you.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 05:59 PM
2

They are associated with men; but they aren't typical for men. Sorry that the current social environment is giving you this unfounded disgust.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 05:56 PM
2

Sorry you are dealing with this toxic waste of a person. I would advise blocking her.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 06:27 AM
5

It's not here, but I do see the impacts of social media and culture on the dating market.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 11:15 AM
7

You mean the movie using Jordan Peterson as an inspiration for evil turns out to have negative attitudes towards men ? :surprised pikachu face:
/r/MensRights07/10/22 10:26 AM
1

Hmm you made me things of something ironic: Given way more females teach, and assuming abuse is equal among them. There are in absolute number way more abuse from female teachers :).
/r/MensRights07/10/22 08:07 AM
6

Validation ... euu, you paid this woman. Doesn't sound like validation to me.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 07:43 AM
5

"You don't believe people can hate or be prejudiced to men ? Sounds very misandristic to me."
/r/MensRights07/10/22 07:27 AM
1

You had sex with no goal having a child. (anti conception used) This typically implies there will be no child (unless otherwise agreed on in case of accidents). Or you can turn it around and have the default be no abortion. In any case this should be discussed beforehand between the 2 people. Assuming abortion was agreed: if you then wish to keep the child counter to your agreement, he shouldn't be on the hook. And you aren't forced to get rid of it; but if you agreed on no kids. And you change …
/r/MensRights06/10/22 10:55 PM
1

This is not a cop out for me. But if you consider abortion immoral; then things change, and the father would be responsible. HOWEVER I don't consider abortion immoral. Hence I don't consider the father responsible for the final decision. He is however partially responsible for the issues the woman has due to getting pregnant. I started my argument with this in my defence: (Assuming no moral or legal obligations.)
/r/MensRights06/10/22 10:41 PM
1

Sorry not religious, a clump of cells has no value to me. It's a tumour you can cut out at that stage. (Obviously we don't cut for abortions per default.)
/r/MensRights06/10/22 10:29 PM
2

If anticonception was used YES it was unwanted/rejected ! It's selfish to bring the baby/child into this world under these conditions.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 10:14 PM
3

So 2 people have sex, anti-conception was used, but it failed. Assuming no legal or moral obligations, at that point the mother gets to decide if the baby is brought to terms. My body my choice, also means the mother has the final say, and thus also responsibility. (The choice would be made after the father either declines or accepts financial responsibility for the child. ) The big practical/legal problem though is: you have to agree if the sexual encounter is with the option of becoming a pare…
/r/MensRights06/10/22 09:44 PM
2

Abortions sounds like a medical occasion, and imo all medical things should be free, so yes. (But only if you country has a policy that medical support should be free.)
/r/MensRights06/10/22 09:36 PM
3

kid you both created And the mother decided to keep. (Assuming no moral or legal obligations.)
/r/MensRights06/10/22 09:34 PM
3

to ensure the well-being of the child? - We consider this to be the sole burden of the mother. Her choice, her problem. And we let them deal with the cost. - Or we truly value the well-being of the child, and support the mother financially and otherwise. 2) The child isn't paying the price of men's freedom, the child is paying the price of the mothers decidsion. ​ 3) Men can't have a child without the woman, so euu I'm lost to your point. *1 Assuming no 100% safe anti-conceptions, and a lot aren…
/r/MensRights06/10/22 09:28 PM
1

Lucky you, I am STILL in damage control :/
/r/MensRights06/10/22 08:49 PM
2

- Yea that really sucks :( I aint happy about it either. - Overturned by the bible ? Fuck these political and believes in the judgement, this shouldn't be !
/r/MensRights06/10/22 08:49 PM
2

Sorry I assumed your conclusion of shite father hinged on the payment.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 08:29 PM
3

You know there is more then being a father then paying the bills right ? My father succeeded to paying the bills; but at the end of the day, he was a bad father.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 08:20 PM
2

I didn't say it wasn't a big deal. But I don't consider it fair to the judged to say they banned abortion. They didn't, they did however practically ban it as a serious side-effect. Deemed invalid by people with no qualification whatsoever -> Did you mean not qualified to rule on the precedent, or the right to abortion ? Because iirc they ruled by the rule of law.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 08:16 PM
2

Why can't you imagine he's a dead beat dad? This is why -> sobbing over fears he would not be able to support her and pay their mortgage
/r/MensRights06/10/22 08:13 PM
3

he sounds like a shite father If you read it, he couldn't pay, didn't sound like a didn't want to.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 08:12 PM
2

Yet the US decided to ban abortion. The US overturned a ruling that enabled abortion. Not because they wanted to ban abortion, but because the ruling was deemed invalid. The conclusion was: the US could not constitutionally decide on this topic given the precedent that was under evaluation. The net result is a ban on a technicality depending on your state, but it wasn't banned. The real fault is the neglect of politicians to implement a proper law for YEARS.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 05:28 PM
10

Depends on local laws.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 02:53 PM
27

Yes, often child support is from birth until they leave the schooling system. It's not uncommon to study until this age.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 02:40 PM
2

One parent ghosted the child. His father texted him, doesn't sound like he ghosted him, but (unless I missed it) the state of the relationship and care was not specified in the article.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 02:24 PM
0

This actually isn't a side-note in this "conversation", it's important. But since it's UK, i'll assume abortion was an option here.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 02:21 PM
37

shouldn't have told his son that I'm not too convinced, he is 22 and should know why his father is nolonger around.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 02:15 PM
3

Banning is like wtf. I will however say the deletion of the post is correct, as it does break rule 1.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 02:09 PM
3

Change the gender: would they ban you then ? If not pure discrimination.
/r/AntiFeminists06/10/22 02:04 PM
5

Lack of non-romantic physical, emotional intimacy, and loneliness.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 11:35 AM
10

Yes, but this is a form of eat your cake and have it too. We can't strive for equality and also accept this as an argument worth taking into consideration.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 10:16 PM
8

Yes no integrity with these journalists : dehumanizing the supports; that's just not something anyone worth their salt does.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 10:10 PM
11

over the course of human history, men have generally had more power in society than women. Irrelevant: it's about what we do NOW ; most of the woman and men who has this advantage or disadvantage are already long dead.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 10:01 PM
13

Why do you feel equity is fair ? Or shall I ask some question as to why it's not fair ?
/r/MensRights05/10/22 09:59 PM
3

Regarding feminism: my general advise is this Fuck feminism, fuck menism; there should only be egalitarians ! *1 ​ Where it feminism went wrong is where they didn't follow their core *2 ideology: equality. *1 or those who don't feel like people should be equal; but wtf ?!? *2 At least what I believe the core of feminism should have been.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 09:54 PM
1

Yes, all these kinds of subs can be really bad on the generalizations. But in this case you are low key dissing my friends. Saying that your generalizations trump my impression of my friends. In which case it just looks like hatred towards men, regardless of individuals involved.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 09:42 PM
1

Can someone explain this concept of "equality feels like oppression" ? Giving rights to one group that didn't have them, couldn't possibly feel like oppression ?!? Feels like another gas-lighting slogan.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:28 PM
2

Note: the therapist is looking through the words of the client. He or she hasn't seen you.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 07:54 AM
1

This is really starting to feel like misandry... All men are X
/r/MensRights05/10/22 07:29 AM
3

Just today: be more assertive, it's not attractive to not be assertive. Way to go self-identified feminist.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 10:01 PM
15

Higher pressure to earn more, and thus make sure they get a better job.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 09:59 PM
2

I dislike labels, but never considered me to be a feminist.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 09:32 PM
8

Hmm I tried to come up with a definition of feminist. And they all seem to preclude the ability to be an egalitarian. They all seem to indicate some aspect of neglect for men. So if you define feminist as someone believes that woman should have rights because they believe in equal rights, i'm all for it. However, usually... we see only the rights for woman, and they forget the egalitarian part. Which I find repulsive.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 04:01 PM
4

Egalitarian here, so depends on your definition of feminist.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 03:17 PM
5

I kinda read it, but I didn't directly see any double standards or mens-rights. But I might have missed it / not know what the typical sentences are. Care to add some text to the post explaining it ?
/r/MensRights04/10/22 10:31 AM
1

O that's fair.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 05:06 AM
1

I really struggle in group settings of +3 people (and that's me included) to engage in any conversation, and I seem to be invisible. It's a struggle to actively arrange meetups with people to get my social needs met. And people rarely contact me. ​ Basically i'm undesirable, but nobody has complains. I'm just too boring in a way I suppose.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 04:56 AM
1

If they treat you like shit then treat them back like shit. So the solution to shit behaviour is more shit behaviour ?
/r/MensRights04/10/22 04:54 AM
0

So if I understood correctly: 1- You are indicating unfair rights/laws against on the men's part. But my initial point was responsibilities. So it was a bit confusing to me. 2- So yes
/r/MensRights03/10/22 11:07 PM
-1

Two questions: 1- relevance to my reply ? 2- isn't that a really sexist model ?
/r/MensRights03/10/22 10:31 PM
1

I have been in their fridge, toilet, maybe not their laundry room. Might be just me. But it might also just be you.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 06:19 PM
1

If your laws or gender-neutra: yes your gender doesn't matter here.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 01:15 PM
-1

... you mean monday ? I dislike long/frequent "X-Days" doesn't matter what the cause is.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 01:11 PM
1

I'm confused isn't this another day ?
/r/MensRights03/10/22 01:01 PM
3

This is something you cannot fix, only she with a lot of help. I am sure there are other red flags and wtf thought patterns. ​ IMO your options are: see if she is interested or therapy ; endure ; or gtfo
/r/MensRights03/10/22 01:00 PM
3

Natural as in, it's the default human tendencies if we aren't mindful of our emotions and feelings.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 11:54 AM
2

The situation is sad, but it's not like we don't accept other things that are similar to this. Just less invasive.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 08:39 AM
4

The IRS is going to have a field day with all this undeclared income !
/r/MensRights03/10/22 08:29 AM
-12

How so ? May I assume the entitlement part ?
/r/MensRights03/10/22 08:26 AM
-10

They deserve contempt, not sympathy. It's very unsympathetic to only give contempt. Unless contempt will actually help them, but I do not believe it would.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 08:24 AM
8

From the article: "If misogyny is an unjustifiable prejudice that has oppressed women — and it is — then “misandry”, as men like to call it, is its natural and justified response." I can understand the natural part. However the justified part .... an eye for an eye is never a good solution ! "The old law of an eye for an eye leaves everyone blind" -- King, Martin Luther jr
/r/MensRights03/10/22 08:21 AM
-2

Can you elaborate why this is the case for you ?
/r/MensRights03/10/22 08:13 AM
-1

I don't agree. Unless you argue me that men have responsibilities woman don't have. (That are set in the law.) And in that case i'd respond with: then we have to fix that men no-longer have these responsibilities, but not hamper woman's rights because we have unfair obligations.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 08:12 AM
2

What isn't too important. But the systemic neglect is an issue.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 08:01 AM
6

Relevance to the sexual assault topic ?
/r/MensRights03/10/22 07:36 AM
6

Crime happens, and due to bell-curves, yes you will find these extreme behaviours more often in the extremities of these bell-curves. But the vast majority, aren't raping and throwing in dumpsters. ​ If you don't want rape (or any crime) to happen: - Invest in caring for _everyone_ - Invest in making it easy to build, have, and maintain good social networks (which causes social control) - Provide universal basic income - Make therapy free - Invest more in mental health. ​ And even if you do all …
/r/MensRights03/10/22 07:32 AM
5

Boys don't have a job, so they don't earn anything ... ​ Ok maybe when there was child labour if we go back far enough. (But why would we do that ?)
/r/MensRights03/10/22 07:27 AM
3

A list of important inventions would be better then a random statement.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 07:24 AM
4

Everyone ... care to elaborate on that ? So even men hate men ? ​ Suicide ratio: It's really hard to get support, and most of the time we are invisible.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 07:24 AM
21

Unfortunately I am not centuries old, and neither are you. So stop tallying up all of history, and look at recent history (max 100 years).
/r/MensRights03/10/22 07:21 AM
8

It is intentionally provocative I wouldn't go that far, that's conjecture. (But it could be true.)
/r/MensRights03/10/22 07:20 AM
4

Most boys wouldn’t think for a second about this. No, they DO NOT think about it, and that's the issue. The harm done is invisible. But not being mentioned time and time again, and only getting negative input DOES have it's effect, especially if it's invisible.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 07:18 AM
3

Being ignored is a form of silent neglect. If it's once it's ok, but it's systematic. And this does have an impact.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 07:15 AM
11

Quite a few yes, but not a lot of love for those comments.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 07:04 AM
1

I don't know a single man that does any of these, to my knowledge: (Maybe I just have good friends ?) ​ For example, men won't put their clothes in the dirty basket, but right next to it. They don't close the toothpaste lid after brushing their teeth They don't close Tupperware properly before putting it in the fridge. They'll leave a mass of dirty dishes in the kitchen, just expecting their wives to pick up for them.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 06:39 AM
2

Small tangent: I will debate you on the toilet seat. Disclaimer: Personally I leave and want it down. However the preference of having the toilet seat up or down as a default is a preference. It's like tiding the bed. If it was "tidy" to have the seat up it would be the default. So having it up or down is actually enforcing your values on another person, and you vilify him for having another preference. I'll go one further: it is not ok if you have to put the seat down, but it is ok for him havi…
/r/MensRights03/10/22 06:35 AM
15

many repeatedly tell men how to put the cups and dishes away, yet they purposefully ignore it. I'm going out a limb here, but most probably ignore it because: it's a preference and there is no wrong way to load a dishwasher. (Maybe less efficient, but not wrong !) Making a fit over how a dishwasher is loaded is a red flag to me, and feels very controlling.
/r/MensRights02/10/22 06:32 AM
3

What DID the follow up studies result in ?
/r/MensRights02/10/22 06:22 AM
40

This is what harmful invisible discrimination and biases look like. (Edit just to be safe: that doesn't mean this is the only one in the world.)
/r/MensRights02/10/22 06:15 AM
1

I haven't noticed any pressure from men regarding mental health, neither for or against. So i'm a little confused on why she would bring this up.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 05:57 PM
5

Depends on where you are, but it won't help your conversation if you are having it with someone.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 11:22 PM
22

""" If you have been brainwashed by the 'patriarchy', start with yourself then, you are part of it. And FYI there is no patriarchy, just gender expectations. """
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:48 PM
1

Ok fair, I read it stronger then it was.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:46 PM
12

Replace men with black-people, would you get vilified ?
/r/MensRights30/09/22 07:08 PM
6

It's a slur, and tying one's word to their sexual life. Basically it's the opposite of slut-shaming. It's when you don't want to have a conversation, have compassion, or are just doing at hominid attacks on people. Basically anyone using the word in this manner; avoid contact they aren't compassionate people they are bitter or angry.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 07:58 AM
32

152 kg
/r/MensRights29/09/22 08:26 PM
9

THIS
/r/MensRights29/09/22 06:35 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtB2xkm0ANs <= here you go @4:22 "She Asks Jordan Peterson About Toxic Masculinity But Can't Define It"
/r/MensRights29/09/22 06:30 PM
6

Done, but it's not clear on which factors contribute to what extend. There is a range of reasons women may choose to come to this session, including increased privacy and sense of safety, greater confidence in a women only environment, to spend social time with female friends and family, or because of religious and cultural beliefs.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 09:21 AM
23

Religion was not mentioned by the city council...
/r/MensRights29/09/22 08:31 AM
6

Religion is a hard one : do we want to accommodate religion ? Suppose that is a question for democracy / votes. But as it stands no discrimination is allowed in principle. ​ Also if it's about religion, then the talk of safe-space makes no sense. Then call it as it is: for religious reasons.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 08:29 AM
14

This is basically non-biased judge-work. I doubt they would concede that this indeed unfair, but that they genuinely have issues right now as to why they are doing this. ​ Also put this in better words but: maybe they should focus on HELPING to fix the woman feeling unsafe, rather then enabling to not deal with their issue. And policing the conduct of bad actors in the swimming pool so they don't have to feel unsafe. ​ This is a "we have an issue, lets NOT fix it but work around it".
/r/MensRights29/09/22 07:43 AM
1

The OP's post is quite cringe. Also just have fun together ? And in principle it's not your problem either. If you get your needs met.... But it sounds like the OP is dumping men because THEY don't get off.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 10:07 PM
1

Bell curves. A tiny minority is going to do mass shootings. Due nature or nurture the curves of men and woman are slightly shifted. This would make the difference between 10^-x or 10^-(x+y). The relative shift Y is linear, but the effects are exponential.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 10:41 AM
3

Nature is cruel, so meh.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 10:00 AM
6

Yes, 2 comments on that: - Both are being discriminatory. - For Ukraine it was to defend, for Russia it's to attack
/r/MensRights28/09/22 09:51 AM
10

We can't be entirely sure what nature selected for. But orgasms for woman aren't required to reproduce. As such calling them broken over conjecture is unwarranted. And even if true, i'd call them unlucky (assuming penetrative sex is desired) but not broken.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 09:46 AM
2

It would be possible to to a survey and compare them with the reported statistics.
/r/AntiFeminists27/09/22 04:03 PM
7

Wasn't feminist-related shaming but : "Real men have truck driving licenses." ; someone needed me to drive a lorry but I don't have the license ... :roll-eyes:
/r/MensRights27/09/22 07:58 AM
59

Set them some boundaries i'd say. Look we are good friends, but all this hate towards men is making me uncomfortable, could we avoid the topic when I am around, because I don't want to be around this negativity. (There is probably a better way to say this, but you get the point.)
/r/MensRights25/09/22 07:40 PM
14

I didn't bother, I went through it diagonally, I know a non-conversation when I see one.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 08:41 AM
23

And the mandatory: "charge your battery" :D :) :D
/r/MensRights25/09/22 08:21 AM
27

Argument indeed, it's not a discussion.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 08:20 AM
2

Sorry probably explained that poorly: Mother doesn't want to be a mother, nor pay for the child, but is willing or wanting to bring the child to birth. Father wants the child. This should also be an option for the mother. (I don't think it will happen often, but the option should be there.)
/r/MensRights24/09/22 10:03 PM
5

I think most are fighting for their right not to be a parent/father/have a child.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 08:48 PM
3

make men less likely to use condoms euuh, just don't have sex without protection ...
/r/MensRights24/09/22 08:46 PM
-3

it's about what's best for the child. If the father doesn't want it, abortion is best for the child...
/r/MensRights24/09/22 08:40 PM
8

IMO if the father wants to take the financial child, the mother should also have the option to complete the pregnancy but be absolved. (Would be rare, but would be fairer.)
/r/MensRights24/09/22 08:39 PM
1

Well yes don't record. But if you want to be nailed on 1 ... But yes you are more likely to be nailed on recording and not experience false accusations.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 04:07 PM
7

The crime of recording is probably the "better" crime. But will it be admissible ?
/r/MensRights24/09/22 01:24 PM
25

unless for some reason you both state your full names. You could probably work that in ;)
/r/MensRights24/09/22 01:22 PM
0

- relating to, involving, or fostering sexism, or attitudes and behaviour toward someone based on the person's gender - reflecting or exhibiting ingrained or institutionalized prejudice - reflecting or exhibiting hatred, dislike, or mistrust Yes it's a form of sexism. However it's not abnormal, uncommon, .... and fully in your right. Note: in this case it's not about looking down at them, but about how you feel about them. You are feeling different towards them, so at the end of the day it's sti…
/r/MensRights24/09/22 07:02 AM
0

it's totally appropriate to allow a customer to pick who will touch their body Yes, but ignoring trauma and other circumstances: this is sexist, even if it's in their full right.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 01:55 AM
1

O don't get me wrong, I love my sex. But it's the intimacy I crave, not the sex. ​ I only crave sex when I already have my intimacy.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 12:41 PM
1

You had me until you assume we "all have some friend who do this" (or that we at least know about.) And the be better is also bad: SOME men need to be better, but not all of us.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 07:06 AM
2

I have a strong craving for intimacy, but not sex. But that might be my personal unique experience.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 06:48 AM
1

I said it was complex to unwind. And there is far more to talk about here.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 06:46 AM
1

Simple solution: you want child support ? Go declare your pregnancy/birth through the state, the state informs the father and has X time to reply. Paternity testing is somewhat of an issue, but for this i'd appeal to "innocent until proven otherwise". So either you admit fault (being the father) or they get to prove it. Then again then the man could deny the paternity testing. (Nice way to flip this on it's head btw !)
/r/MensRights22/09/22 06:44 AM
0

Equal rights is simple. It's not due to biology. Now when it comes to financial rights, it's really simple (expect in the practical details): you wanted it ? You pay. When it comes to fatherhood/genes rights or choice of keeping a child. This choice impacts the bodily autonomy of the woman. The other aspect of difference is: you can have a child with someone else, but you can't not have child with someone else. So in that regard the woman's choice to keep it more vile then the not keeping-it cho…
/r/MensRights22/09/22 06:41 AM
-11

If you keep it simple: yes. But there is also the difference between forcing parenthood or denying. Assuming either party can choose, there is also that difference. And i'm not entirely sure what the implications or unwinding of that would be.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 10:46 PM
3

This all made waay more sense when people got together far younger.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 09:58 PM
6

The problem is getting a DNA test from the child before the insurance can pay out.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 09:57 PM
-12

This is actually fairly complex to unwind. But the primary difference is pregnancy and birth ; and reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 09:55 PM
2

Part one: yes part two: why is it there ?
/r/MensRights21/09/22 03:39 PM
1

Sorry it was just the way it was phrased. Carry on.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 01:24 PM
2

I should talk more face 2 face, though I could probably use a DM as well on 1 topic.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 11:44 AM
6

I'm ... busy, have some life choices to make, socially and touch deprived, not feeling too loved, not feeling to great. But things are manageable in a not sooo unconformable way.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 07:24 AM
7

You know why, people will just hurl slurs at you to discredit/dehumanize/devalue you so they don't have to listen.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 07:23 AM
1

Also suicide in men is an issue. A father killing himself will devastate a family. So which part of this is worse the first sentence or the second ?
/r/MensRights21/09/22 07:21 AM
4

ALSO want to say that i'm not an incel edit: i just got banned from a bunch of subs wtf Small rand on those: you know things are fucked up because you have to / can say those things.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 07:19 AM
11

Would she step up? No as there is something going on psychologically, if you are upset all day if you mention the money is tight; then I suspect she is either suffering from entitlement, is already stressed/unhappy, or has a low stress threshold. In any case this is something you want to look at / talk about.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 07:15 AM
3

I like it, and if they dish on MRA, you can be like "So WRA is ok, but just because man is involved it's crap ?"
/r/MensRights20/09/22 08:25 AM
1

Ok then we need a new word for people working for female rights.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 07:47 AM
1

IIRC it's a post the admins locked to 0 up or downvotes.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 04:10 AM
-6

WRA and MRA are compatible. They both want equality so no conflict there. Being both means you are an egalitarian. Being MRA or WRA even makes it logical that you would also be a MRA or WRA ! ​ EDIT: replace original feminism with WRA
/r/MensRights20/09/22 04:07 AM
1

Chlamydia: yes Syphilis: no Gonorrhea: no https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2020/figures.htm Looking at the slides and gender breakdown. I'm not sure, unless men are just more likely to get them (taking into account sexual orientation already).
/r/MensRights20/09/22 04:04 AM
7

Don't take this to serious: 1100% more men died during work ? I'd say the gap of 7.9% isn't big enough !
/r/MensRights19/09/22 09:49 PM
2

learn safe sex ... really strictly speaking she got pregnant ... AND kept it. You can't get pregnant, she can, so it's a her problem. !!! READ THE REST OF THE POST !!! It's like getting in a boxing match, allowing to be hit on the head, and then NOT putting on a helmet. And then complaining about it. If you see your partner isn't using protection, don't have sex. HOWEVER that doesn't mean men shouldn't practise safe sex, it's only social/empathetic/ethical/moral/in your own interest/... to do so…
/r/MensRights19/09/22 04:59 PM
1

A bandwith sure. Sorry for the analogy I did a TLDR.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 04:05 PM
5

I suspect you'd barely have an argument with the former one to begin with.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 11:40 AM
4

Wait ... we are having this discussion before I was bloody born !?!
/r/MensRights19/09/22 11:38 AM
3

Once those injustices are resolved and we get back to normal Depends on where you live, for example if we would import USA shit in the EU right now things would become extremely toxic. Things are fairly resolved here ... Why wait ?
/r/MensRights19/09/22 06:52 AM
3

Would be a shame yes to loose sight of the issues you don't experience. People addressing/resolving all of the issues regardless of gender would be nice. But I feel like often we are forgotten. ​ I also feel got here because we tend to see only 1 sided (female) things in the media.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 11:31 PM
3

Men have a harder time in false sexual allegations. Woman can have a hard time to get their allegations recognized too. And so can men ... actually men might have a harder time here too... But can we PLEAASE stop making this a competition ? It's not because one party has issues that the other party's issue do not exist !!!
/r/MensRights18/09/22 10:07 PM
3

Hmmm i'm not sure I have seen much minimization here, or am I mistaking ?
/r/MensRights18/09/22 08:51 PM
1

If I understood it, this one would mess with some protein specific to sperm. So the side-effect could be close to 0. And reversals .... is a gamble, in the first year your chances are fair, and then it get progressively worse and worse. If you get a vasectomy assume it's permanent.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 07:09 PM
5

Yes, monogamous, as i said ignore the polyamory side of it. But have a look at a relationship smorgasbord.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 07:07 PM
5

Would you buy it if she wouldn't wear it ? I think that's a good question to ask yourself. In which case you buy it store it, if she asks about it then you figure this out ?
/r/MensRights18/09/22 07:07 PM
13

Which is it ? Investment / parking money OR not gifting jewellery ?
/r/MensRights18/09/22 05:28 PM
1

This is a really tricky one ... I think it's because we are mixing expectations / society / and typical norms into a discussion. u/jacare_o Where are you 2 on the relationship smorgasbord ? (Ignore the polyamory side of it.)
/r/MensRights18/09/22 05:27 PM
5

So which is it ? Ridiculous beauty standards OR men will fuck anything with a pulse. ​ I'm personally not under the perception that any of my male friends are not interested in not dating someone unless they are unhealthy.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 03:46 PM
12

Said person might need a new gynecologist.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 03:41 PM
0

You mentioned habit, you didn't mention addiction.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 01:12 PM
28

It's even sexist towards woman as well. It's just plain wrong on SOOOO many levels.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 11:26 AM
2

What do you mean MGM? And is "mutilation" immoral if it's consented?
/r/MensRights18/09/22 06:44 AM
2

It's a bad choice of words, toxic gender-roles/expectations are a far better choice of words. They just used the man part as a slur.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 06:40 AM
2

This is the only one that leaves room for positive interpretation: Loving dogs is seen as a good thing (typically) ; let me explain you how you can past your issues that prevent you from loving a man too.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 06:39 AM
14

My advise with these is always: if you see them, create the opposite book (well cover art). Post it online linking to the original book. Enjoy the fireworks. O and tell me about it, I value having no double standards so I will engage in the discussions.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 06:37 AM
3

how I am stressing her out Sounds like she isn't part of the team that deals with finances.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 06:32 AM
1

I would be celebrating ! ... if this wasn't the 500th time I heard about this kind of stuff.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 06:29 AM
0

Where did this idea of addiction come from ?
/r/MensRights18/09/22 06:28 AM
2

If you can believe the tone of the article, it's not silly. Maybe science got good, let see what the results say.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 11:11 PM
1

Then as someone suggested, poke with a little stick. Try something easy "how do you feel about proven false accusations without repercussions" ?
/r/MensRights17/09/22 08:45 PM
3

So discrimination it is :)
/r/MensRights17/09/22 06:37 PM
2

No, why do you find this silly ?
/r/MensRights17/09/22 06:35 PM
2

Are you still depended on her ? If not it's a good way to see if someone values you as a human being. If you are shunned, better to find out now, then when it might actually matter more.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 06:32 PM
3

Sweet, so that either means you don't have female friends, or you are being discriminated by woman.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 06:26 PM
5

If you don't want to play that game, you first want both sides to see that they have benefits. Because without that, the game already played itself.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 06:22 PM
1

benefits Sounds way better. Privilege would be laws that grand one sex more rights then another. -> A privilege is a certain entitlement to immunity granted by the state or another authority to a restricted group, either by birth or on a conditional basis.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 06:06 PM
3

Are you getting any from men ?
/r/MensRights17/09/22 06:04 PM
1

I feel like the argument should stand without that presupposition. But even with that presupposition, I don't understand the train of thought.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 06:02 PM
1

That's arguing the situation, i'd like to understand their reasoning.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 06:01 PM
3

With all these extremism on both sides, you will offend someone. You will even offend someone if you DO NOT take a position. So good luck ;).
/r/MensRights17/09/22 07:03 AM
2

if its acceptable for me to be a MRA? Let's go deeper, why would you fear this is not acceptable ? What are some reason you could give me why this isn't OK ?
/r/MensRights17/09/22 06:40 AM
2

FYI: can anyone translate this word spaghetti ? It sounds like "who is the bigger victim ?" or "not a true Scotsman" to me but I can't make head or tails from this reasoning. Being rewarded for not going against the status quo and being the recipient of institutional privilege are not the same thing. Systems like the draft and chivalry may seem to favor women at first, but upon closer examination, they simply reinforce the sexist institutions that keep men and women from true equality (also call…
/r/MensRights17/09/22 06:36 AM
8

Since privilege these days is defined as having something someone else doesn't have: YES even if it's as simple as getting more hugs.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 06:29 AM
14

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/sexismhttps://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/sexist Even the dictionaries are sexist. ​ The dutch dictionary get's it right though, plain and simple with no political colour: https://www.vandale.nl/gratis-woordenboek/nederlands/betekenis/sexisme
/r/MensRights17/09/22 06:27 AM
1

FYI You can get herpes(shingles) from less then sex ; I got it on my back and it's NOT from sex.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 08:07 PM
1

I don't have a source: but here is conjecture -> Hate / demonetization of men is ok -> This creates an empathy gap. And that hurt men.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 06:41 AM
1

You do see the irony right ? ... Posting on the internet to a random stranger that you do not like their poll; and they should get a life ? .... ( And yes I am doing the same.)
/r/MensRights14/09/22 09:58 PM
2

Actually here is a counter for that argument: the ability to speak up.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 09:51 PM
9

First define the scope / definition of real. Misandry is as real as misogyny; both happen but it's not universal. So what you are actually going to be dating is the extend in which it happens. But having a grey goalpost "real" is going to make it really hard to argue any case.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 09:36 PM
2

Compatibele imo
/r/MensRights14/09/22 12:40 PM
1

Intrestring, do you have more details ?
/r/MensRights14/09/22 07:31 AM
4

Hmmm, i'd get a court to assign a psychologist to the child. Because A) They need to find out what's wrong with the sperm donater, so they can remove the donater from the life or B) They need to undo the damage the female incubator (mum is to much of a compliment here) did to the perception of dad.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 05:58 AM
1

Close connection with friends can take a lot of that burden of your shoulders. It's not the same, but it sure makes a dent.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 05:55 AM
14

Thinking about this, this is actually child abuse.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 05:49 AM
0

If this is true my advise would be to only give the First Letter of your name. (I mean sounds more then feasible, and not deceptive.) Let them guess your gender.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 05:48 AM
1

Country ?
/r/MensRights13/09/22 05:39 AM
1

I didn't miss the gross part, that was my complaint.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 05:36 AM
2

The second () makes it sound as this is your personal opinion, and would only apply to men. Is this correct ?
/r/MensRights12/09/22 11:05 PM
3

That is _REALLY_ fucked up.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 10:56 PM
0

"However, any issue that pertains to men's relationship to society is also a topic suitable for this subreddit." <= sounds like withing the rules ?
/r/MensRights12/09/22 07:46 AM
3

On the girl aspect -> due to language history "my girl" was seen as normal, as such there is no negative associations now.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 07:42 AM
1

Ok good. Cause people could still have a desire for it. And I have no objections to allowing people to do it, but I do have objections to things being forbidden. That's why.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 06:37 AM
7

Doesn't even need to be revenge porn for this to be illegal in most places.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 08:28 PM
21

In most countries, you have to give consent for you to be used in photo's and art for non-private use. Check your local laws / specify your region of residence.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 08:27 PM
1

Noone can actively give you self worth I disagree (within reason). Or maybe only the opposite try to take it away ?
/r/MensRights11/09/22 08:26 PM
0

Power is always given (within reason). Either freely or not, and either subconsciously or not. You don't have to fall for arousal. You don't have to tie your worth and self-worth to their validation. There are other sources of meaning. Initiation,sustenance -> Not sure what this means.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 08:25 PM
1

All or only child circumcision ?
/r/MensRights10/09/22 10:50 PM
6

I also feel like this. But on the flip side, if the perception of woman > men (instead of =) stays, then this should get visibility. However I think it's not needed in this subreddit...
/r/MensRights10/09/22 03:06 PM
0

It's a way of saying: this hurts, and I don't care about the evidence, I care about my perception and my feelings. Which is valid when we are talking about how we wish to emotionally engage with someone. It is however not valid when we are talking about policy and what is or isn't allowed. (Of course one should not go out of their way to offend someone, that's just harassment.)
/r/MensRights10/09/22 03:00 PM
2

Isn't this such a study ?
/r/MensRights10/09/22 06:17 AM
27

A woman displaying her sexuality to a man without consent is way better than a man displaying his sexuality to a woman without consent. Why ? It's not because we are different that we should be OK with dealing with the same shit.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 05:47 AM
2

I have (non romantic interests female and male) friends I can talk to.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 12:15 PM
1

Sorry, replace men/woman with whatever minority you want. I wasn't being specific to the UK situation.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 10:25 AM
1

Look into SET https://peoplepsych.com/support-empathy-truth-set-for-borderline-personality/ it might be effective here.
/r/AntiFeminists08/09/22 04:49 AM
5

The thing is, no woman was wrong in the past, because yes there are capable woman to fill in a position. (How many depends on the sector and general interest of woman in this field.) HOWEVER Going the opposite site, no men is wrong now. ​ It's not because something was wrong in the past, that doing the exact same thing now (but in reverse) is good. Two wrongs don't make a right.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 04:29 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzpMRCeTHYE Mandatory on this comment :p
/r/MensRights08/09/22 04:24 AM
88

Even a more general rule for life, friendships, work, investment, healthy boundaries, ... Never commit substantial resources (time and or money) to anything until you are sure (of the ROI, commitment, ...) . Until then commit what you would be OK loosing.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 04:20 AM
1

euuu, care to elaborate the master/slave thing ? Or is your preferred relationship style D/S ?
/r/MensRights08/09/22 04:12 AM
1

You are not required to weep at therapy and you are allowed to do it talking side-to-side. (Though for therapeutic reasons, they prefer to being able to see your face.)
/r/MensRights08/09/22 04:09 AM
8

This to me sounds like contempt of court : why they are circumventing a court order of shared custody / visitation rights / ...
/r/MensRights08/09/22 04:05 AM
2

I'd reply to : wow that's bad, guess we have another issue men face to talk about after this. But back to the false rape issue.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 04:04 AM
8

I don't live in the USA, but from what I hear over there : I think I would prefer being raped by a person, then being raped by the state and my social/work/... environment. As in the first case I loose my agency for a while, in the second they take your life away.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 04:02 AM
3

You can recover from rape pretty quickly euugh depends, there is forced rape, there is "drunk rape", didn't say yes or no ... so it all depend on how dehumanizing and how much self-agency was lost. In some cases it can take years of work and therapy to get over it. And some never really do.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 04:00 AM
3

My thesis is that men have no problem opening up under the right circumstances. Yes, but it's really hard to figure out who you can open up to.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 03:06 PM
107

In the defence of the sub where this was posted, people said: yes
/r/MensRights07/09/22 08:21 AM
1

Cheating is cheating, and it's wrong whatever the reason. Maybe they have a reason, but then you break up (if you are in a monogamous relationship).
/r/MensRights07/09/22 08:07 AM
1

I'd evaluate the friendship with these people, because these friends have issue empathizing or dealing with things outside their mindset/scope/experience. And that will get you into emotional trouble when you need really them, and at that point you will find out you are lacking good friends. I don't say toss them out, but make sure you have some good friends in your pool.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 07:26 AM
2

Source ? Can't find any in a fair time.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 07:21 AM
4

My friends don't post international woman's day. If you have friends that do, i'd recommend posting "what day is it today ?" on international mens day.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 09:19 PM
23

A lawyer who has been bullied him/herself might just do it for free.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 09:48 AM
3

Fighting dirty only works if you can also fight dirty. But I don't think the victim role and other tactics would work for RMA.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 06:30 AM
3

https://www.dw.com/en/german-policeman-jailed-for-condom-stealthing/a-46797174 thank another person in this treat for the link
/r/MensRights05/09/22 10:40 PM
2

Either law or judge. But someone would need to look up the law to know.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 10:38 PM
1

My first question would have been: what this picture about ? And why is the woman looking sad and why is the men depicted mean ? This is very confusing, is this picture insinuating something ?
/r/MensRights05/09/22 10:34 PM
1

In the EU / my environment this isn't the case at all.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 07:39 AM
1

I'm saying I am sorry you feel expendable, I would argue that most people do not see woman/you at all in this way. But I cannot argue with your experience. I however can try to give you the numbers so you can compare your experience and news sources to those numbers. But something tells me the amount of male victims you see pass by is slim. Also murder is a relatively rare occurrence, so that in itself should have little consideration as to how expendable woman are viewed. Also why the hell is t…
/r/MensRights05/09/22 06:41 AM
1

Thus, at the global level, more than twice as many women as men are killed by their intimate partners or family members. https://www.unodc.org/documents/gsh/pdfs/Chapter_2-2.pdf Maybe this helps to place your perception into perspective. It can tell you if the news you are getting is biased. As you should have 1 male victim article, per 7 female victim article.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 06:19 AM
18

They might care, but will they tell you?
/r/MensRights05/09/22 05:44 AM
1

So orbiters and not friends. Well I hope (not that it is a thing that needs to happen) she can experience some genuine friendships with males too.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 06:26 AM
6

So you feel expendable (as a woman I assume from the context) ? Can you elaborate ?
/r/MensRights04/09/22 06:18 AM
1

Why does your partner not have male friends ?
/r/MensRights04/09/22 06:16 AM
3

OP didn't say that. OP said IF woman respect me; not SO.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 06:14 AM
26

Ukraine men would like a word with you.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 06:08 AM
3

If you want to make a sacrifice, one doesn't care. If you are forced or considered expendable, that's some serious dehumanization and causes psychological harm.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 06:08 AM
4

Tip: read my entire comment before going on a rant. I did say she was probably also a victim and not a hero.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 07:13 AM
2

Being thrown in the deep end, and maybe already having had some issues ?
/r/MensRights03/09/22 06:16 AM
2

I'd all or a victim in this case. Or a hero if she knew she should get out when things got bad , but didn't.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 06:11 AM
4

Would this help to understand the logic: People inside a burning house wanting to get out : victims Firefighters going into the burning house to save them : heroic Then again in this case, it caught her by surprise, so she didn't know the house was on fire, so she is actually also a victim.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 06:07 AM
8

Yea I was also thinking that. I would assume 1 year doesn't do you in forever. But I could be wrong.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 06:00 AM
202

https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/woman-pretended-to-be-a-man-dies-assisted-suicide-realizing-difficult If this is to believed:it seems she never got over the mental difficulties and setbacks she faced from living as a man. In the summer of 2022, Norah finally succumbed to her pain and died at the age of 53 via assisted death in Switzerland. So ... living in the shoes of a man can kill a woman ? (! Anecdotal non proven statement !)
/r/MensRights02/09/22 09:07 PM
2

Looks like Croatia.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 06:43 AM
15

Ha editorial hell has been going on for maaany years at wikipedia, sorry you felt the need to donate.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 09:09 PM
5

That's a pro-life or pro-choice issue, this would lead us to far and outside of (in my opinion) mensrights. An it's a discussion I will not have .
/r/MensRights01/09/22 07:09 PM
4

I agree.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:53 PM
8

But at the same time they shouldn't be forced to endure 9 months of pregnancy. (Not to mention labour.) ​ My basic boundaries and respect would dictate that self-control trumps your need for a kid.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:52 PM
39

It's not about that, it's about what kind of a person that does this.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 04:38 PM
26

Yes, but that doesn't mean they have the final say.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 03:50 PM
82

Psychotically unstable/unhealthy woman will tear you a new one yes. ​ O and if she hits you, get out now, this is a really bad indicator, even if it doesn't hurt for shit.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 03:47 PM
2

90% here too.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 10:59 AM
2

You can find a male therapist (usually).
/r/MensRights01/09/22 10:21 AM
4

O I didn't fault you, but sometimes I feel like this is a US place only :p. So adding some counter weight.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:19 AM
6

Depends on your country, in some places there are rules about unjust terminations.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:14 AM
6

With a good therapist it is introspection on steroids with a referee on the sidelines and a coach to lure you in the right direction.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:10 AM
1

You did you part, you checked if your partner was using birth control, so you took your responsibility. If it was a women she would check for a condom,if it was a men if they are on birth control medication.The only difference is: you only have her word, she can check. O and I would classify this under rape. You did not consent to unprotected sex.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 10:17 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/wpad9a/bye_bye_duluth_model_bye_bye_narrative_more_men/ Relevant post
/r/MensRights31/08/22 10:14 PM
1

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262306031_The_Sexual_Victimization_of_Men_in_America_New_Data_Challenge_Old_Assumptions <= there you go This is probably why you are getting downvotes.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 10:10 PM
2

That we only have egalitarians left. No more gender wars.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 04:49 PM
1

FYI: I suspect you are being down-voted for quoting disputed facts about rape victims.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 04:05 PM
0

My biggest issue with your quote is, depending on the context, such a statement should never be made. It should be "everyone is valuable" or "all humans are valuable", specifying a gender out of context means either you imply men are not, or are neglectful of them / their existence.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 04:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter