TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Qender Archive

View 0 posts and 18 comments by Qender on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

That's an odd conclusion. I looked up the surveys from this site and many were telephone or in person. Keep in mind, with any type of survey, people are likely to be less willing to admit to rape or being raped, meaning the statistics are likely worse than presented by any survey, not better.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 01:51 AM
1

Which I would assume is done when it can be proven. If there are witnesses or physical evidence. When there is no proof of who escalated, the police usually arrest both parties in most states. In some states they simply arrest whoever did more damage, but file no charges. The filing of charges is typically then up to the people involved. It's not really a gender bias because men and women are both capable of causing any amount of damage or even killing. Even a very small weak woman can pick up a…
/r/MensRights27/01/12 10:20 PM
1

That's how any dispute works, not just domestic violence, if two men are fighting, absent witnesses, blame will typically fall on whoever caused more damage. The idea is that self defense should not require escalation far beyond the original injury. It's not a perfect system, but I see no gender imbalance. What would you suggest is a better solution?
/r/MensRights27/01/12 09:19 PM
1

And yet, when one looks at the number of women who run for office and the number of women in office, they're about the same. We've had female presidential candidates many times in the US, and there's never been a female president. No it's not that simple. Jobs that require more hours often more per hour. You're going to have to rephrase that for me. Pay more per hour? If so, then I say again. Studies have been done that took the number of hours worked into account and the men were still earning …
/r/MensRights27/01/12 09:00 PM
1

I see no record of that. Please cite sources here, as the research I did seemed to indicate simply that whoever actually caused more damage was the one who would be arrested. Not who was capable. Also, both parties are capable of pressing charges, and the arrest is merely a precursor to the actual charges.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 08:30 PM
1

But see, that's your mistake to begin with, you think this whole time I'm saying women have it worse off then men. I'm not. I'm saying women have problems. It's simply not a competition. And I have no qualms with that. It's when the lies and the bullshit enter the frame, which frankly has been like that since day one. You seem to be unaware that there is a group that denies women have any problems at all, that says sexism does not exist, and uses that as an excuse to manufacture claims that cont…
/r/MensRights27/01/12 08:15 PM
0

So what you're saying is, the men are the true victims because they're the rapists? No, I actually hear what you're saying. You're saying the men have it worse. You know what, I think you're right, I would agree many of them do. But you want to argue with caps. Here they come. SO FUCKING WHAT? Does men having it worse make the sexism go away? If a guy is murdered does that magically heal the rape victims? Why is it every time I say a problem that feminism faces, you Men's Rights people think tha…
/r/MensRights27/01/12 08:42 AM
1

So what? That doesn't discredit my point in any way.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 08:24 AM
1

How so? Rape? it has many causes: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_sexual_violence I don't think primary aggressor policies regarding domestic violence help men. At all. I looked up those laws, and have no idea what you're talking about. Please explain. Those laws dictate who is arrested after a domestic violence dispute, in some cases arresting both parties and letting prosecutors deal with them in others allowing officers to judge based on injuries. I don't see any gender related issues …
/r/MensRights27/01/12 08:14 AM
0

They also run for government positions less often. Yes, because of sexism, the sexism in society tells both men and women that politics are a male field, and it's much harder for women to get any support. That's part of what feminism is trying to correct. They also work less. If you got paid less and were passed over for raises, you might stop putting in that extra overtime too. Men see more results from their extra hours, women don't. But that doesn't matter, studies have been done that account…
/r/MensRights27/01/12 08:03 AM
0

No issue it too small to be focused on. Especially not an issue as huge as all of gender discrimination in the developed world. The definition of whether it's to eliminate sexism, or for gender equality is irrelevant. 1 in 6 women are raped, women make up less than 20% of major government leadership positions, they are paid less then men, there are only 12 female CEO's in the top 500 companies, female characters are excluded from about 50% of popular movies and entertainment, women are harassed …
/r/MensRights27/01/12 02:26 AM
-1

So, you're saying I benefit if my fiance were to be raped? You're saying you benefit if your mother or sister were raped? I made a perfectly clear and good argument, and you claim it's invalid simply because "your argument being invalid is the status quo around here" Not critical thinking at it's finest. Also, I didn't bring up the "feminism helps men" thing. Znonkin did.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 02:13 AM
-2

Feminism is a worldwide movement targeting worldwide issues. What, are there no women in the middle-east? Or you just don't care about the women there? It's not just the middle east, there's rampant sexism around the globe, in China and India, there are abortions of massive numbers of women, and men are considered highly valued over the women. Rape against women is used as a weapon of war in Africa, where 1 in 3 women are raped per year, a women have a higher chance of being raped then learning …
/r/MensRights27/01/12 02:07 AM
1

The issues are separate. Why should a women who wants to fight for the rights of abused women be required to fight for other issues to be considered valid? And vice-versa, why should a man who wants to fight for custody rights, or recognition of sexism against men be forced to also fight for unrelated issues to be listened to? People have the right to focus on individual issues, the constant accusation that groups are not inclusive enough are silly. Feminists are not saying that when it comes to…
/r/MensRights27/01/12 01:59 AM
-1

More accurately it could be compared to the billions of women both in the past, and still currently around the world, who have no rights to own property or money, who are not allowed to work, who are required to obey their husbands with no option of divorce, who even sometimes forbidden from leaving their homes or showing their skin in public. How is that not slavery? But it was not actually intended to be a direct comparison of the groups having identical causes, rather one being a cause that f…
/r/MensRights27/01/12 12:49 AM
1

Agreed. It's human rights, which is separate from animal rights, which are also important. Human Rights is a HUGE subject. Within it is children's rights, elderly rights, men's rights, women's rights, etc. Do people not have the right to focus on women's rights? Is there some aspect of ethics that says if you want to help women's rights you have to focus on men's rights too? You're the men's rights subreddit, are you also then bad people for not including animal's rights? Or children's rights to…
/r/MensRights27/01/12 12:35 AM
0

I would suggest that feminism is for women, and about women. It's women's issues. But men benefit because they are a part of society with those women in it, and there is some overlap, in that sexism affects both men and women. For example. Lots of women are raped, I know that men's rights people like to contest that number, but we can agree it still happens quite a bit. Feminism seeks to educate both men and women so that rape happens less often. Thus women benefit by being safer. Men benefit in…
/r/MensRights27/01/12 12:31 AM
0

Yes I said that. And I stand by it. I'm a man. I want to fight against stereotyping of men and I think I should have rights. I also want to fight against the stereotyping of women and I believe they have rights. I do not believe these two goals conflict in any way. It's not a zero-sum game, it's not a war. Sexism exists against both men and women. Sexism is caused by both men and women, and when you're dealing with the women's half, it's called feminism.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 12:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter