TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Qhost Archive

View 17 posts and 147 comments by Qhost on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
532

Qhost/r/MensRights17/01/13 09:19 PM
43

Qhost/r/MensRights23/09/12 01:23 PM
40

Qhost/r/MensRights23/05/12 11:20 AM
40

Qhost/r/MensRights30/12/12 06:29 PM
40

Qhost/r/MensRights22/05/14 05:01 PM
30

Qhost/r/MensRights10/04/14 09:29 PM
21

Qhost/r/MensRights11/05/12 06:11 PM
13

Qhost/r/MensRights19/05/12 12:13 AM
10

Qhost/r/MensRights25/05/12 10:47 AM
8

OutrageQhost/r/MensRights25/04/14 07:11 AM
5

Qhost/r/MensRights04/01/13 01:41 AM
3

Qhost/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:19 AM
2

DiscussionQhost/r/MensRights04/05/14 06:05 PM
2

re: FeminismQhost/r/MensRights30/07/14 01:15 PM
1

Qhost/r/MensRights14/04/12 05:02 PM
0

Qhost/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:53 PM
0

Qhost/r/MensRights20/12/12 11:40 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

I see nothing wrong with this. Humor has no limits.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 04:20 PM
23

And the very next thing written after that is view men not view men and women Once again showing the original point in the study and comments. My god you're retarded.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 09:55 AM
4

It's painful to watch /u/khal534 fail to get this simple point again and again >.<
/r/MensRights03/11/14 09:04 PM
11

Honestly, I disagree. I think its the other way around. It seems nearly all the stories we see on a false accusation is because someone wanted revenge/cover up a problem/attention. Often feminists have a idealistic fantasy idea of consent, but I wouldn't think its so drudged in society that those kind of false accusations where the person actually, but wrongly, believes they were raped outweighs the liars and attention seekers.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 09:42 AM
1

Yeah you're right. Tori, the feminist did seem to have some naive idealism going on with consent as you mentioned, it seemed like she hadn't been asked those particular questions before from how she struggled to answer, but that happens to us all. There were some questions towards her which were poorly phrased but thats being live for you. JB was right that if feminism consisted of intelligent, thoughtful people like Tori it wouldn't be a problem. (or at least a very little one)
/r/MensRights01/08/14 01:38 AM
1

Yeah JB's MO doesn't work well with the feminist they have on. Does JB have a phd?
/r/MensRights01/08/14 01:15 AM
1

Perfect quote for amr right there.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 12:58 AM
20

What the hell are you even talking about?
/r/MensRights18/07/14 09:15 PM
24

SRS/AMR are going to jump on this. But you are right, I know people who like being a victim because it gives them certain privileges. It's terrible, but it does happen.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 07:04 PM
-1

No. That's completely wrong. I have no interest in defending feminism. I have an interest making sure this movement remains intellectually consistent and doesn't make generalizations.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 06:08 PM
-4

I see no reason why (without making gross generalizations) we shouldn't give a damn what a feminist would think.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 05:35 PM
-1

Image is vital in making it clear and easy for people to understand what we are for, what we represent and what we disagree with. I've come across some threads here which I think 'Hey, If I was a feminist seeing this I wouldn't think it was satire, it would look just like a hate movement'.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 05:30 PM
1

Thanks for the comment. I agree with everything you said. And there should be room for satire. You're right there is a balance there, I am worried that if satire becomes a main staple of our commentary, well to quote Descartes: 'Any community that gets its laughs by pretending to be idiots will eventually be flooded by actual idiots who mistakenly believe that they're in good company'. I think satire can be a very powerful tool when used in your example, a separate article, rather than individua…
/r/MensRights22/05/14 05:27 PM
0

Feminist on the other hand take that tendency and turn it against men to get whatever they put on their wish list while demonizing men as much as possible to sustain a eternal guilt trip employing the vilest negative stereotyping they can get away with. some feminists / radical feminists. This is another kind of language we should be careful with; mindless generalizations about feminists. I'd be with you but it seems your consumed with some PC B.S and I'm not the least bit interested with trying…
/r/MensRights22/05/14 05:20 PM
15

75% chance r/AMR will link to this with some sexist 'Mister made up another oppressed-male story!!one!1' title. Regardless of the story, and just sticking with the the law, I'm confident this will change (people understanding female on male rape is... rape). Be patient, and argue reasonably. People are coming around to view female-on-rape as a thing, and soon the law will change. I've noticed more and more intellectual feminists are getting more vocal when it comes to female-on-male rape. And si…
/r/MensRights22/05/14 04:41 PM
0

Agree on both counts +1.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 01:00 PM
5

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia End of 3rd paragraph: ' many child sexual abuse offenders do not meet the clinical diagnosis standards for pedophilia and these standards pertain to prepubescents.' Might ultimately be down to semantics... but worth mentioning anyhow. It also doesn't seem hard to imagine an individual who would sexually abuse a child not for their own sexual gratification, but for other evil reasons: Desire to torture, cause pain, revenge etc.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 12:41 PM
4

This wouldn't be pedophilia apologia, but child rape/molestation apologia. Pedophilia does not mean child rape. In fact, a child rapist doesn't mean a pedophile either. Just nitpicking :)
/r/MensRights22/05/14 10:05 AM
10

Yeah, listen to their cries of 'bullshit' and other insults. It's crazy. This is not an audience interested in looking at both sides. This blind anger and ad hominems and pseudo-intellectuals (like the guy who said she was using a strawman because she used one of the most basic tenets (patriarchy) as a litmus for feminism). It has so much in common with religious bigots it's frightening. And where are the feminist groups denouncing the insulting actions? None. Nada. :/
/r/MensRights22/04/14 07:56 PM
4

All forms of rape have the potential to be subjectively funny when used in the correct comedy medium. Stand-up comedians use rape all the time, sometimes very directly, sometimes less so. Comedy should not have any limits. Let's not be like some feminists who wish to restrict the freedom of humor because some people find it uncomfortable. If you don't like it, don't watch it.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:16 PM
1

Yeah, that's correct. Apologies for my over sight.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 03:04 PM
8

I remember seeing the '35' false rape prosecutions. So I googled 'false rape conviction' and all the people who are convicted have anywhere between 2 and 20 false allegations behind their belt. Hardly just '35'. And that's just the people who have had a Jury decide the evidence was enough for a conviction. Unless the girl/guy directly confesses to making false allegations, it is almost impossible to prove that it was a false allegation. I have no doubt there are way way more false allegations, j…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 09:33 AM
3

It's an egalitarian issue...
/r/MensRights10/04/14 09:30 PM
17

TBH I have nothing but pity for Aerik. Seeing someone fueled by irrational hatred so much is just sad. If he/she at least avoided committing egregious logical fallacies in his/her arguments, he/she would be a valuable asset in making sure our points were intellectually honest.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 01:47 AM
15

Let's not use language like 'Mangina'. It's on par with how some people accuse us of 'mansplaining' - let's be above that :)
/r/MensRights08/03/14 09:15 PM
4

It's important that we answer critics questions honesty. Let's not become an ideology which mocks people like some advocates of feminism do. Only by being consistent and answering truthfully can we show others that some peoples idea of us being women-hating etc are completely false.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 10:24 PM
6

I know its tempting to use a level of mockery, but isn't it better if we don't echo some feminists use of words like 'Teh Menz!!!' etc?
/r/MensRights03/03/14 12:34 PM
212

Some men like the idea of being 'hulk', and having women swoon over them because of their body and being seen as a 'hot piece of ass', it IS their 'power fantasy'. Some men don't like it, or care and it isn't a 'power fantasy' for them. Some women like looking at these bodies, and the media responds to that (book covers etc). Some women like the idea of being hot, lean, reeking of sexiness and having men swooning over them because of their body and being seen as a 'hot piece of ass', it IS their…
/r/MensRights28/02/14 10:03 PM
10

Anything said by Jessica Valenti should be taken so very lightly. I brought her book 'Full Frontal Feminism' and honestly it was one of the most awful books I have ever read. It had a handful of 'sources' (including the wage gap >.<), weak arguments and spelling errors sprinkled around. She is not an intellectual, her level of academic writing is that of high school. She shouldn't even be considered anything more than a slightly glorified tumblr feminist.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 11:02 PM
24

Keep that shit off this sub.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 07:31 PM
2

I agree. It's painful. It might be personal taste, but I like carefully constructed sentences in a borderline gravel voice, ala Christopher Hitchens.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 01:52 AM
7

"My penis was forcibly enveloped against my will." This is the issue that MRA find. That this is not called rape, but labelled 'Sexual assualt'. The whole 'Men are raped more' generally comes from if we count this as rape, and account for prison rape, are men raped more? I guess ultimately there is such a margin of error that it is a worthless statement. Perhaps it's more intellectually honest to say 'There is symmetry between the genders when it comes to rape'
/r/MensRights07/02/14 03:35 PM
6

Here Table 2.1 and 2.2, on page 28/29 - looking at 12 month statistics
/r/MensRights07/02/14 03:20 PM
7

I don't think you looked at the tables. Only men have the 'Made to penetrate' filled out, with the 'Rape' row not filled out. The opposite for women. Only men have this special 'sexual assault' called 'made to penetrate' that in 12 months has the same number as 12 month rapes for women. So no, it doesn't work both ways.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 02:57 PM
14

Factoring in the 'Made to penetrate' (come on, how is that not rape?) statistics, it shows men are raped more, does it not? Maybe its ultimately down to semantics.. But any time spent in the MRA world would teach someone to consider the semantics of 'rape' very carefully.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 02:32 PM
3

The title is technically correct, but the article it is linked to doesn't really help. See the comment in this thread by Tamen.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 02:22 PM
13

I can't believe they were labeling us as racist and anti-gay. I would love to see the logic behind that.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 08:54 AM
29

PZ Myers went from being a valuable educator on biology to... this. It's a shame...
/r/MensRights18/08/13 05:55 PM
7

Shame, considering the Nordic countries are, in my opinion, the best in the world. The roots of radical feminists reach far and wide..
/r/MensRights18/08/13 05:54 PM
11

This isn't new. A short list at the CotWA shows that it is story after story. Welcome to the patriarchy. /s
/r/MensRights13/08/13 12:55 PM
16

Men Going Their Own Way
/r/MensRights11/08/13 08:23 PM
2

Exactly, it could have been a family member.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 08:48 AM
9

And nothing of value was lost.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 04:53 PM
5

Absolutely, I should conclude: Because of how society is at the moment, for a man to get revenge, pretending to have been raped is a horribly inefficient way to go about it. Its incredibly difficult to be taken seriously. The chance that the man was truly abused seems to me, evidently high. But, as I, and many of us, would ask for sufficient evidence before making up our mind if it was a female we knew claiming the same - I will hold males I know to the same standard. As society becomes more acc…
/r/MensRights10/08/13 04:45 PM
12

I think the validity of male word-of-mouth accusations also comes from how the men act. I have never seen a man go around telling, no wait, celebrating his victimhood to everyone that he was raped, or sexually abused, or races to the police in confidence (and anonymity) that justice can be served. They all seem to me more concerned with how they can get proof from their rapist (such as recording a convo). There's a pervasive sense of 'I want to be believed' than 'I want to get revenge'. These fa…
/r/MensRights10/08/13 04:18 PM
10

God damn that red-headed woman again. She feels like another Rebbecca Watson - someone who isn't qualified academically or intellectually to talk about the subject they debate on, but yet somehow builds up supporters...
/r/MensRights31/07/13 02:43 AM
2

This talks about how DV is pretty much equal yet academic feminists lie, manipulate and threaten to make DV seem to be a gendered crime. What about the CDC giving men a 'unique' sexual abuse called 'forced/made to penetrate'. Sounds like rape? Yeah it is, and once you accept that, rape is also equal, and possibly higher if you include prison rape. What about the notion that gender is a social construct, directly opposing evidence in evolutionary psychology and neuroscience? This is one of the mo…
/r/MensRights30/07/13 03:15 PM
7

Yeah the feminists in there seem far more egalitarian than here on Reddit or other organizations. Nevertheless there were still the standard 'Men Issues? HA!' attitude in that thread but I'm numb to that now. The staff seemed to be the more hardcore feminists from reading the thread, which is never a good thing. I haven't seen enough of that thread to truly see if the user was banned for just requesting it, or for something else. There are 44 or so pages to go through. Aint nobody got time for t…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 10:12 AM
4

Exactly. It's brilliant. These posters probably barely get men's rights any traffic, but by making a huge deal out of it and having articles written about their counter protest. They do more to boost support for MRA's than other MRA actions.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 04:34 PM
1

Hmm I made the other poster the OP linked, and I got some red pill moments with it. I never claimed that the poster I made should be how we primarily spread MRA awareness, but it should be one method. It simply is the only way to get the message to some people. Yes it can be seen as insulting towards some people, but others it is the red pill they need.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 11:11 PM
6

Sorry not to reply completely on context, but I always wondered: If a patriarchy hurts men in any kind of pervasive way then that society cannot be a patriarchy. I know a lot of people here dislike the amazing atheist, but in one of his videos he made the point that generally it's the people with money who have power, and both men and women below them suffer.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 09:27 PM
7

This is a resubmission as there was a fatal error in the original .png format of the picture rendering it almost unreadable. Apologies to those who have already commented on the old submission. I wasn't completely brought in by the current comic on the front page as I thought it was only effective in reinforcing pre-existing views of both sides; I think most moderate and radical feminists would find it insulting and not consider what the comic is saying. So I decided to try a different way, same…
/r/MensRights17/01/13 09:22 PM
1

Fixed
/r/MensRights17/01/13 09:11 PM
1

If you want to save it, save the .jpg version which includes the background allowing it to be read off imgur. here Thanks for the kind words.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 09:11 PM
1

Hmm it seems when I exported it, it didn't include the black background it had... - Luckily the imgur page has a grey background allowing it to be read. However clicking on the image renders reading it impossible. I'll try to fix this >.<
/r/MensRights17/01/13 09:07 PM
1

Edit: it seems my .png export from flash gave it a white background, here is it updated I wasn't completely brought in by the current comic on the front page as I thought it was only effective in reinforcing pre-existing views of both sides; I think most moderate and radical feminists would find it insulting and not consider what the comic is saying. So I decided to try a different way, same method, but the reveal was more conversational, more relaxed and hopefully, more reasonable. What do you …
/r/MensRights17/01/13 08:58 PM
2

It points out how gender roles, and feminism's influence, has caused women to be treated better in the same crimes as men.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 09:44 AM
27

Yup. The girl and father get destroyed. The father, who attacks OP is sentenced and has to pay all his court fees and do 200 hours community service. The girl continues her bullshit and eventually her and her boyfriend quit the college, and then move to Sweden. SO MUCH JUSTICE.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 06:15 AM
2

Keep in mind I did say I don't hold them to be true. It's just a thought experiment.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 08:47 AM
2

It's a valid and good analogy. You're right. And now that I think about it more, I think we should actively call out misandry / semantic violations since the people who will simply shut down when presented with a argument aren't going to be convinced anyway. It is just as worthwhile preventing people from becoming a feminist, than re-educating existing feminists. I have been reading a book called 'Full Frontal Feminism' and it's treating feminism like it's a wonderful and progressive ideology. I…
/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:51 PM
16

Feminists who call people misogynists are pathetic. They have warped the meaning of the word to mean 'Anyone who disagrees with my particular version of feminism'. In fact, I have never seen any feminist ever use the word to mean what it actually means: Hatred / Dislike / Aversion to women. You think rape jokes are funny? You obviously are a misogynist (I also have been called homophobic and racist for appreciating that some rape jokes can be funny). You aren't a feminist? You must be a misogyni…
/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:23 PM
2

Interesting! There is a sub-context that is key with posts like this - I'm not saying: 'Hey Feminists! Here are some things wrong with your movement I would like you to fix mmkay?' It's more of a 'Look how far feminism is from retaining any level of intellectual honesty. Look how universal, and staggeringly it fails. Yes, if it fixed all these I might find it respectable, but we all know it isn't going to, and so this lists serves as a highlight to all the things wrong with feminism as compared …
/r/MensRights31/12/12 03:26 AM
1

I would like (if you would be so kind :) ) your commentary on my post to SarcastiCock here.. You don't have to, I just like getting a wide range of opinions and views, I really appreciate the time though.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 10:30 PM
0

Do you think 'feminism' has a place in 3rd world places like Yemen? Or should we refer to these as Women's Rights Activists?
/r/MensRights13/12/12 10:28 PM
1

Do you think these reasonable feminists who you can side with shouldn't identify as feminist? And even if they want to, considering how dominating central feminism is (like the tenet of the patriarchy) are they non-feminist anyway, by definition?
/r/MensRights13/12/12 10:26 PM
3

Why do you not trust them anyway? I'm interested in your reasoning.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:59 PM
1

Haha :)
/r/MensRights25/09/12 03:20 PM
1

Ha! I haven't just hit a nerve, I've ravaged it. Normally I try to reason with people like you, or at least plant a seed of modesty that sprouts years later. However you're too far down the rabbit hole of childish tactics and immature retorts. Speaking of eating dicks. Sucks how Islam is HELL for homosexuals >.< Guess that's what you get from a pathetic religion of violence and barbaric rules.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 03:16 PM
1

Looks like I hit a nerve. Repeato: Truth hurts.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 03:07 PM
1

I'm not going to fall into the fallacy of that because you have yet to refute my points, I'm right. However, looking at your comment history you seem to be some desperate intellectual snob who has no space for differing opinions. You consistently insult those who disagree with you. You are nothing more than a pseudo-intellectual. You remind me of myself when I was 14. Good times, thinking you know everything about anything. Nevertheless, naivety soon comes apparent and is replaced by modesty. It…
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:59 PM
1

Truth hurts. You try telling the Arab world that they are taking it out of context.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 02:50 PM
3

Thanks for the link - I never knew this subreddit existed!
/r/MensRights23/09/12 08:19 PM
5

Yes! 2:228 "(Women) have rights similar to those (of men) over them in kindness, and men are a degree above them." 4:176 "Unto the male is the equivalent of the share of two females." 24:31 "And tell the believing women to lower their gaze and be modest, and to display of their adornment only that which is apparent, and to draw their veils over their bosoms, and not to reveal their adornment save to their own husbands. ... And let them not stamp their feet so as to reveal what they hide of their…
/r/MensRights23/09/12 08:17 PM
3

Yes, because Islam is the epitome of equal rights for women.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 08:04 PM
2

My mistake. You're completely right.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 08:03 PM
4

The problem is the generalization of women as 'lazy as shit'. It's clear that Patched_SAMCRO didn't mean every single woman, this is the language you use when angry - you speak in generalizations to vent - however, anti-male groups will quote him literally and make us look bad.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 10:09 AM
1

I know the value of being raised by both parents - however I don't think I like the idea of it being an irremovable right. I will have to think on that one...
/r/MensRights25/05/12 01:32 PM
1

I'm saying the opponents of this will argue that women only get to make the choice to remove something from their bodies just as men can. They don't get to choose not to become mothers which merely a consequence of such a removal. Arguing that men should be able to avoid becoming fathers is then arguing for equality of outcome since women have no such choice. If I'm understanding that that is what people argue. That's insane. That's just being pedantic, saying that they don't choose to not becom…
/r/MensRights25/05/12 01:20 PM
3

I agree that the emotional trauma of an abortion is there - which is why alongside reproductive rights, I would advocate better sex education and contraception. In addition to support groups for the female. I would want as many pregnancy to be wanted / planned for and as little abortions as possible.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 01:00 PM
2

If we advocate an opt-out policy, then that argument becomes weak; Since I could say 'When opting out, a man only has the choice to not become a father, by default, he is to become the parent unless he opts out.' With regards to it being equality of outcome, I honestly don't see the huge dichotomy between that and the equal opportunity.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 12:58 PM
0

How is it not a choice to become a mother? Yes, there is a difference because the women has the child growing inside her - but her choice of abortion/adoption is STILL the choice to become the childs mother or not. Choosing to NOT have something grow in her is still the choice NOT to be a mother. Opting in/out gives the father the same choice, without infringing on the mothers rights. Yes, there is a difference, the mother has to have an abortion to opt out while the father just needs to sign/no…
/r/MensRights25/05/12 12:41 PM
1

Did you read my blog post? The entire thing explains how we can avoid the situation you just mentioned.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 03:05 PM
1

When it comes to irresponsible sex, such as one night stands. If the female gets pregnant then the male still retains right to opt out. Since the option of abortion is always available to the mother, the father should have the option to opt out with (1) document in all the same situations. I've put that into the post. I'm baffled at this, but I'll take your word for it. So am I, I don't normally over look such an obvious thing. Maybe it's because I'm dehydrated, haven't eaten and roasting in thi…
/r/MensRights23/05/12 02:23 PM
1

Whoa whoa whoa, hey now. I honestly did not consider that a women can opt out at any time, it slipped my mind. Consider my mind changed, friends now, k?
/r/MensRights23/05/12 02:15 PM
0

I'm concerned about this. Surely opt in would allow men to go around getting people pregnant with no need to fill in documentation? No consequences, with opting out, if the father cannot be found initially (I.E from a one night stand) then they are stuck with child support. And rightfully so for being irresponsible. That said, with an opt out, that also gives the male a free reign to sleep with whoever he wants and then opt out. Maybe there should be a added clause or two addressing irresponsibl…
/r/MensRights23/05/12 02:04 PM
2

True, but with opt-in like this, there are troubles with unexpected pregnancy - what happens then? Contraception can and does fail. I think bureaucratically and logically, a opt out is simpler and easier. There's less that can go 'wrong' and requiring extra documents. With opt-out, the 'unexpected' pregnancy are not a problem.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 01:55 PM
2

Absolutely, but when it comes to an abortion, I believe it's a woman's choice completely, since it is her body. This is about protecting the father financially from unwanted children. Currently, the mother has complete control on the financial situation.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 01:51 PM
3

My initial concern is this: Women: I want a baby: Man: So do I! Women gets pregnant. Man: Changed my mind, not going to opt in. I think either way, you will need similar documents to protect the mother/father.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 01:46 PM
2

Could you elaborate a little more? Esp. how it would remove the need for two documents.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 01:42 PM
2

Hey, thanks! I'll correct that right away! Edit: Done, thanks for the correction. I swear I'm slightly autistic and I mix things like this up all the time. I think west is east half the time.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 01:41 PM
5

I think there should be a legal form a man can sign before he impregnates someone. Basically it establishes that in the event of a pregnancy, the male will have no financial responsibility but also no parental rights to the child, unless given by the mother. I.e to protect males who don't want a baby, but the women goes ahead. Giving a man some reproductive rights. I'm pretty sure there's a huge hole there somewhere...
/r/MensRights21/05/12 08:02 PM
4

Don't sensationalize the title. "At this point, they're not really looking at this as a homicide, murder-type case," Hutson said. "That could change if new information were found out." With that aside, I think it's awful that, if this carer was abusing Arnold, that he spent the last period of his long life suffering under the hands of a horrible human being.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 02:25 AM
6

Got a source for the last sentence?
/r/MensRights20/05/12 02:21 AM
-4

Saying the only interesting thing a women can provide is sex is not misogynistic. It is perhaps sexist, but it does not in anyway suggest hatred, contempt or aversion for women. It spells ignorance and naivety, not misogyny. Don't use misogyny as a scare word. It's lost so much meaning it's practically synonymous with 'sexist' in some circles. It's becoming a cliché.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 02:19 AM
1

Hey rapiertwit, I was inspired by your post to make a blog post raising several more points. I do give you credit twice in it! Have a look
/r/MensRights19/05/12 12:16 AM
1

As I mentioned in the blog post, thanks to rapiertwit and his post here from bringing attention to this. (I do give him credit twice in the post, and once again here!) I made this post after realizing there were 7 or 8+ more shared characteristics with a typical conspiracy theory.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 12:13 AM
2

I agree that it is likely, I just want to make the point that we shouldn't go out of our way to declare it is a feminist without hard proof. With the subreddit associating itself with us, again, probably a feminist, but it could also be a generic troll trying to fuck things up for the hell of it.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 10:45 PM
1

I'm happy to see that in your re-post of this, you didn't do any conclusion jumping. We should keep a watchful eye and correct the ignorance whether we can.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 10:29 PM
4

If you give an overview of challenges faced by men, you MUST quote sources. And don't just link the source, tell them exactly what part of the source you're referring too. It's all to easy for white knights and feminists to throw out the 'I don't believe you, you have no sources'. Give it to them straight away, give them no-where to run.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 10:21 PM
2

It's discussions like this which we should upvote and encourage. These discussions allow all of us to evolve our ideologies and knowledge. Your demonstration of good faith argumentation is laudable.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 10:41 PM
3

I agree. I'm interested in why you're being downvoted. You are addressing the topic without bias and without anger. I applaud you. You have a level head and make fair points. http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ly8ju3ksHq1qh993z.gif
/r/MensRights11/05/12 10:31 PM
1

I've always enjoyed a bit of jurisprudence and as I hope to take philosophy at university - I'm happy I found him out :) Great discussion by the way!
/r/MensRights11/05/12 08:50 PM
3

True, but from my experience of forums, even the 99-9-1 rule applies to traditional forums as much as they do on reddit.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 07:39 PM
1

I certainly agree with you on Blackstone formulation TIL the Blackstone formulation! Are you saying that nothing short of a confession from the accuser would satisfy the 10 to 1 ratio in your mind? What sort of evidence would you accept as beyond a reasonable doubt? I didn't mean to suggest that, sorry if I wasn't clear. While I value conclusive evidence like DNA etc, I will also be convinced by the evidence you suggested (An obviously made-up story, points proven wrong, shown she lied about som…
/r/MensRights11/05/12 07:37 PM
2

Wow I wouldn't've suspect so many. It does look like we are the biggest though.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 07:09 PM
1

I always stress physical evidence when it comes to the law. I think it is the most valued asset to find someone innocent or guilty (I'm sure you do too). I also agree that allegations (falling apart under scrutiny) are very likely to be false - however it is currently my philosophy that I'll rather let 10 guilty defendants get away rather than let 1 person innocently be convicted. So while I completely agree that there is evidence for (probably) many allegations, if I was on the jury, the eviden…
/r/MensRights11/05/12 06:48 PM
2

IAMA: 'I am a ____ Ask me anything' Have a look at the /r/IAmA subreddit for a bazillion examples.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 06:36 PM
1

I don't know if you missed it, but after a few replies, I changed my view to: It would be beneficial, more would be stopped. Off course, it would be even better if we could change the attitude towards rape as a whole.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 06:16 PM
2

'screaming faggot tantrums' I'm actually not sure if your comment is aimed at me, as my posts in this thread have been the opposite of an emotional tantrum, and my points have been coherent. Edit: HA! Redditor for 20 minutes, nice throwaway! I assume you upvoted your own comment, troll?
/r/MensRights11/05/12 05:55 PM
2

Completely agree, and thank you for listening/reading :)
/r/MensRights11/05/12 05:46 PM
1

Since you picked only a small part of my reply to attack. I'll do the same, and much more succinctly as well. Yes, we are equal in worth because both genders fulfill a necessary function, but we are not equal in design, thus not equal in function. Equality = Equal human rights and equal treatment via the law. Doesn't matter that functionally men are better at exercise and women are better at multi-tasking. Treatment via the law and human rights should remain consistent and non-bias. You seem to …
/r/MensRights11/05/12 05:43 PM
1

I have a friend who has just been accused of rape - in the papers his full name is displayed, while the girls are hidden. He is afraid to go outside in his hometown as he would get in fights. The papers also acted like he had already been convicted of being guilty. I might make him to a IAMA for you guys once it's over.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 05:19 PM
2

I think it is also a crime here. However, it has to proven to be false - most rape allegations are unfounded and it's never known what the truth value is. Keep in mind I changed my opinion on the subject here.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 05:17 PM
3

I wrote a reply to this, and then another. And in the progress I will admit I changed my opinion. I think despite SOME men and women who would not confess because they would go to jail. It is key to have a sentence for all the other cases that are proven false via DNA testing, other conclusive evidence. I think it will outweigh the negatives to have a sentence. I do only think it should be years IF the defendant also spent time in prison. I'm against long prison sentences, esp. multi-decade ones…
/r/MensRights11/05/12 05:16 PM
3

Great comment! Your username worried me so I confess, I went through your post history a bit and saw you frequent /r/masculism - You seem like a very rational, down to earth, intelligent being. We need more people like you over here :P Each story (the accuser's and the accused) hold equal weight, and the police need some additional evidence in order to show by the preponderance of the evidence (more than 50%) that the person most likely committed a crime in order to even arrest and charge them. …
/r/MensRights11/05/12 04:54 PM
4

You think it isn't important to have a good image? Yes, using words like 'cunt' to expound our ideology may be more in-line with the anger some of us feel, but it is ultimately dangerous and detrimental to what we aim for; equality between genders. Here's why. The men's rights movement doesn't exactly go out on NBC, CNN and FOX and broadcast its opinions to millions of viewers. We don't have 'head speakers' which can articulate what we all want to say beautifully. If you haven't noticed, the men…
/r/MensRights11/05/12 04:35 PM
21

I don't believe in 'setting an example'. The guy was held for 9 hours, it's bad that he was accused, but he didn't spend a decade in prison like some people. There's a problem with setting a sentence for false accusations, and that is that if a women lies, and knows that if she admits to lying and the guy goes free, she will go to prison. She's not going to do it. EDIT: Changed my view, look here. It's a difficult area to address, but I feel what would make a more positive difference is to have …
/r/MensRights11/05/12 03:56 PM
3

Christ, in the future, articulate your anger in a more controlled way. It's post like this that /r/againstmensrights picks up on and uses to label us as a 'hate hub'. Our 'movement' is VERY controversial to MANY people, so comments like that REALLY damage our public image.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 03:51 PM
19

TIL r/againstmensrights Oh my god never have I seen someone(s) so desperate to find misogyny where it isn't. The person(s) who runs this is cherry picking quotes and trying to label them as hate speech. Even if the quote is downvoted, it is still attempted to label us as a hate hub. They even have a bot (assume it's a bot) analysing all of us.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 06:03 PM
13

How is he sexist? The Amazing Atheists aggressive language is part of his youtube personality, when he talks about feminism he advocates equal rights for both men and women by focusing on both genders. His language, you may disagree with, but his message is fine.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 04:51 PM
5

The Amazing Atheist video all about this.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 02:56 PM
11

This is a perfect example of the point I made over in /r/feminism (or over here at some point) - about how if a misleading article is posted in /r/MensRights , or some kind of circle-jerking title, we always point it out! It's almost impossible to get anything inaccurate past you guys! In /r/feminism it's blind close-mindedness, but over hear, we actually critically analysis our posts and content. (✌ﾟ∀ﾟ)☞ You guys =D
/r/MensRights19/04/12 02:04 PM
14

Thank you. It's horrific seeing this... It's horrible knowing that these are the feminists with an actual voice and power. The 0.1% (educated guess) which might be tolerant/not crazy don't have any voice or power :(
/r/MensRights19/04/12 01:22 AM
14

Hate to be this guy, but source that they embrace the mass murder of males? I'm sure a lot of us would like to have a source like that in our arsenal.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 12:51 AM
1

Please point out any pragmatic issues in this topic. I made it in 5 minutes with no thought that it would be considered trolling. I absolutely hate that I am being considered a troll by some people and would love to put it straight.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 04:52 AM
2

I'm sorry I'm not trolling. If I didn't use self-defence as a key point in my post then I apologize for not being sagacious enough. The conundrum was an after thought, it was not meant to be the key point in this post. Please look through my entire comment history of (my almost 2 year old account) posting on mensrights and then tell me im trolling. Because I am NOT. And so what if I only have a handful of posts? What do you think I'm doing? working as a spy /r/feminism or something? This is incr…
/r/MensRights15/04/12 04:42 AM
0

I'm not a feminist nor do I support feminism thank you...
/r/MensRights15/04/12 04:38 AM
-1

No. Absolutely not. Your comment is wrong. I am being sincere and not trolling. I'm sorry if I come across as brash, but I hold the topic of rape and other Men's Rights issues at heart so to be called out as 'trolling' is very insulting.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 08:33 PM
1

Understood, thanks.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 05:57 PM
4

I just looked into this (from here) While it comes across as gendered since it starts with 'the penetration', it seems to have actually been changed to be less gendered than before. It specifics penetration but not the gender committing the penetration. It's exclusive of whether the penetration was initiated by a man or woman. This is actually great news, I can't believe I haven't seen this yet. The prior definition of rape — "the carnal knowledge of a female, forcibly and against her will" — wa…
/r/MensRights14/04/12 05:54 PM
5

Sounds like he is still in the relationship? It must be hard for you, as a family member, to see another family member in an abusive relationship. Have you tried helping the situation?
/r/MensRights14/04/12 05:47 PM
8

I've seen plenty of evidence and stories about how education is female biased. I emphasize with you.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 05:46 PM
1

Is there anything more to the binding of the hands? Pepperspray isn't available over here (UK) otherwise I would have some :(
/r/MensRights14/04/12 05:45 PM
5

This topic covers the social influence of feminism on violence against women, it also covers legal discrimination, specifically rape. So yes, it is relevant to Mens Right's interests.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 05:44 PM
2

Really? Looking on wiki: In any allegation of rape, the absence of consent to sexual intercourse on the part of the victim is critical.[4] Consent need not be expressed, and may be implied from the context and from the relationship of the parties, but the absence of objection does not of itself constitute consent. Lack of consent may result from either forcible compulsion by the perpetrator or an incapacity to consent on the part of the victim (such as persons who are asleep, intoxicated or othe…
/r/MensRights14/04/12 05:41 PM
1

This is a really good study. A good firm sample size also. Thank you for this. I will be memorizing the key points.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 05:30 PM
1

Out of interest, what did you do to lead up to being hit/ threatened and what did you do during and just after the event?
/r/MensRights14/04/12 05:19 PM
1

Since 'Quick blow' sums up my sexual life, are you talking about a gun here? What's the full story/is there a news story to go with it? I assume there would be.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 05:17 PM
6

MRAs can do the same thing, and present something that isn't a norm as one, but in my experience this is usually met with a pointing out of the fact that it isn't the norm, and it happens way way less than feminists do the same thing. I've been on /r/mensright for some time - and I have often seen someone make a post against feminism, or women in general when they don't have any ground to back it up. They are always called out, downvoted etc. I have NEVER seen /r/feminism do this. I think the 10…
/r/MensRights13/03/12 04:47 PM
12

I looked at the comments and someone said this: [r/mensrights] operates on the premise that men are oppressed by the legislation and societal standards we have in place, which is quite backwards. Terrible injustices happen to men and women alike, but Men's Rights seems to take a lot of cases in which men have been mistreated out of context, and present them as being the "norm. What the hell? This is EXACTLY the issue. I don't know if this person is a feminist or not, but it doesn't matter. The a…
/r/MensRights13/03/12 04:14 PM
2

Completely agree. The first course of action would be to try get away.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 09:08 PM
25

This. I will neutralise a threat coming from a female just as I would if it came from a male. Drunken guy attacks me? Defend myself, with force. Drunken girl attacks me? defend myself, with force. If attack continues from either sex, force goes up exponentially. (assuming I haven't had my ass handed to me, I'm not going to pretend I'm a blackbelt in everything like a lot of redditors) Tiny lady who couldn't hurt me without a weapon starts punching me? Push her to the ground and walk away. Tiny g…
/r/MensRights11/03/12 04:47 PM
11

Just throwing this out to r/mensrights, but do you think 2 years was the right length? She will probably be out in 1 year for good behaviour.. soo.. 1 year is enough? Or do you think it should be equal to whatever the man would have got?
/r/MensRights10/03/12 10:30 PM
3

Mm yeah, I agree, it seems to me there are many people who are deserving of a place in top uni's, they just didn't have the extra-circular activities to really sell themselves.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 07:44 PM
3

You're right to some extent. When I have gone up there visiting family, there are some idiots who are self-absorbed. But that is the minority. The rest of them really come across as highly intelligent individuals who by all rights reek of our countries next top level leaders/politician/scientific advances. Cambridge and Oxford students really are the elite of our population, having spoken to many of them and debated them, they really are deserving of their reputation.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 07:35 PM
11

My brothers at kings college, cambridge and yesterday posted on facebook the below article, apparantly some kings students started writing 'DSK die' on the union building and got arrested. http://www.varsity.co.uk/news/4589 You would think Cambridge students, who are effectively students in the best university on this planet would protest in a better way.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 03:35 PM
0

Even if this was a correct conviction, no man OR women should spend SEVENTEEN years for an act of rape. Fuck.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 08:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter