TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Qix213 Archive

View 0 posts and 166 comments by Qix213 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
84

Oh there are, they just aren't so vocal and so suggest to be non existent compared to the ones who are louder.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/21 02:20 PM
19

I would imagine the number is affected by the fact that mother's tend to be the default single parent. So for the father to get full custody it tends to mean he really has his shit together. If both parents are douchebags then the mother is more likely to have full custody.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/20 02:41 AM
69

And now he's the social pariah. He's the horrible man that hates women. Etc etc. Like OP said, it's a social death sentence, few people are up for that kind of a war. If a woman complains about sexism, she (appears to) get all the love and support in the world. I much so that she didn't even need facts. That's not always true, but she certainly isn't treated the same as a man. A man complaining about sexism is not only reviled by women, but a large portion of men as well. If he has anything that…
/r/MensRights23/10/19 01:39 PM
30

I totally agree. Except that men saying the same things get banned because these same women freak out about it screaming sexism. It's just these new rules being applied to both sides that is supposing them.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 03:59 PM
23

Exactly. It was them that made these rules be so stringently enforced to begin with. They are just shocked that it pertains to them as well.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 03:56 PM
9

And which do you think is less likely to get reported?
/r/MensRights15/04/17 04:07 PM
29

That's what I always laugh about with this new wave of feminism. They quite literally state that women are so inferior (in any number of ways) that they have to get special treatment.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 04:04 PM
11

There will be DVD copy available to kickstarter backers, but that was initially quite a small number. I would love to see her kickstart something again. Watch all the crazies denounce her as satan incarnate while getting 1000's more donations this time around.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 02:28 PM
5

And it doesn't just hurt those that are accused and their families/friends. The wide support of these accusations in the media and courtrooms changes the way people act and think in 100's of small but significant ways. Knowing how much power a woman can wield over you through the courts and public opinion causes men to think different about relationships. It makes them wary. It makes some recede even further into themselves, they will act different in order to not give a woman more avenues for c…
/r/MensRights03/11/16 06:47 PM
13

If you want to get kicked out of school and waste your tuition money in the process, go for it.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/16 03:01 PM
-2

This guy gets it.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 03:54 PM
-1

Well, maybe the judge is implying the accusation is false and so it actually has nothing to do with rape.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 02:27 PM
-1

wELL, MAYBE THE JUDGE IS IMPLYING THAT THE ACCUSATION IS FALSE, AND THEREFORE
/r/MensRights15/03/16 02:26 PM
3

You are right of course. I should have defined feminists better.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 10:23 PM
120

Just another one of those issues that women have the advantage in and suddenly don't seek equality. Yet feminist keep trying to tell me that their cause is about equality for women AND men.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 06:02 PM
12

If a woman aborts a fetus the man is free from all responsibility, if a man "aborts his responsibility" 100% of the burden falls on the woman. She can choose to abort her responsibility or take on sole responsibility. Totally her choice. Share the cost of the abortion and related costs. Solved. If you want the kid, keep it. If not, get an abortion. Please tell me you understand this.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 06:00 PM
4

I know I'm not welcome here I'll be gone in a minute I promise Please don't go, I can't speak for everyone (yes I know there are asshats everywhere, especially /r/MensRights) but I welcome you here. Echo chambers are useless. If you can't communicate with the 'other-side,' you have already dehumanized them and become part of the problem, not the solution. That's why your post is top voted in the thread, and I believe you will get far more upvotes than horrible messages in your inbox. ...are a di…
/r/MensRights07/01/16 07:12 PM
1

so they really couldn't accuse me of rape without someone else vouching for me. Depending on the local culture at your collage, all it takes is the accusation... But, I get your point.
/r/seduction22/12/15 11:09 PM
3

Morals are a personal thing, but for me, it depends on intent. Did you go out of your way to get her drunk so you could get with her, something she would not have otherwise done? Or did she get herself drunk and start flirting with you first. And then there is all the gray area in the middle... (In the US) As for legality, especially in the current collage climate, you are taking chances. All she had to do is regret her decision the next day by being embarrassed. Nobody had to prove anything for…
/r/seduction22/12/15 02:24 PM
3

Did you choose to drink? They you are responsible for all your actions after drinking. If both parties consent, it's not rape. How hard is that to understand for these people.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 07:11 PM
2

It's hard to say without coming off as a douche. But when I feel like I have the upper hand by being in the 'higher league', I've noticed I act differently. I don't have to think about things like 'assume attraction' and all that. Because I just can be myself without worrying about the outcome. If she turns me away, I haven't lost much, so there is no overthinking or worrying. And that means I have a much easier time being more forward with kino and being sexual.
/r/seduction09/07/15 10:15 PM
1

When the Moore's character goes over the head of the Master Chief and tells the CO of the base that you've given her a different set of rules and then told her to fit in. That she wants one standard, treat her the same/fairly, no better no worse. Exactly why my mom and best friends little sister love this movie.
/r/MensRights03/07/15 02:07 AM
2

You are probably on your phones, but these are in the sidebar. Not dedicated to your question, but does hit upon that point. http://www.reddit.com/r/seduction/comments/15qems/billys_guide_to_text_game/ http://www.reddit.com/r/seduction/comments/ecmm8/how_i_go_from_number_to_first_date/
/r/seduction23/06/15 05:25 PM
1

Good read. Really shines a better light on the things I do accomplish or achieve. I'm not a great shape, I'm 35 and can barely run 2 miles. But completing a 10.5 mile Tough Mudder and and down the dry slopes at Tahoe last weekend was a huge challenge. This article really helps put it into a better light. Instead of only seeing the side that I could have done better/faster/easier and all that BS.
/r/seduction19/06/15 06:10 PM
8

There are nice guy's and there are "nice guys." Being thoughtful is one thing. Being the cliche worshipful-beta-neckbeard 'nice' is not attractive. "Nice" being used as a stand in to replace "creepy" most the time is what causes the confusion. Having some sort of ice cream she mentioned two weeks ago via text on hand is sexy-nice. Showing up to a first date with her favorite ice cream she only ever mentioned three years ago on facebook is creepy-nice. When you say things like "you're too cute to…
/r/seduction09/06/15 12:40 AM
3

Even if she rejects you, it's only awkward if you make it awkward. Don't make a big deal out of asking her out, or her response. Just casually ask her out and let it be just another day regardless of the outcome. I'm no player in any sense of the word, but I've been friends for many years with girls I've asked out and had no issues. In fact, handling like a man will only help in the end. Best wingman you can have is a wingwoman.
/r/seduction29/05/15 08:32 PM
2

I really shouldn't be commenting here, I'm a noob at this stuff myself, but I'll just reiterate the things that have worked for me so far... Don't stare at a girl waiting for her to turn her head towards you. She can tell you were staring. That feels creepy and usually leads to you turning away to not get caught being creepy. Try to glance over and back away every once in a while and catch her eyes that way. The thoughts in your head can almost be read with someone looks at your face, especially…
/r/seduction21/05/15 06:11 PM
8

This is why our (guys) learning to keep eye contact is so important. Not only to reciprocate and show your own interest, but to even see if she is interested herself.
/r/seduction21/03/15 04:22 PM
2

It's something different. Its a skill that you know you don't have. Failure is very likely. But at the same time being good with women is part of what society (including we ourselves) defines and being a man. So that rejection hits hard when it's internally viewed as making you less of a man. Fear of rejection, translates to fear of those that have the power to reject you. This is why becoming outcome independent is so important. Losing that fear makes you more attractive and in turn less likely…
/r/seduction08/02/15 08:57 PM
3

I'm afraid of getting intimate with her and she realizes I'm a virgin because I suck at everything and they get grossed out by me. The only thing she (assuming you had a good date) will dislike is your embarrassment over it. After a good night out, she will only be turned off by your embarrassment, nothing else. A lot of girls will find it endearing. Others will take it as a challenge to get into your pants first. Some will themselves become awkward because they think a lot of pressure is on the…
/r/seduction12/10/14 03:58 PM
1

"she was clearly trying to treat me like her pet the entire time" This is exactly what she was doing. Good job at realizing it, it's a lot harder to notice when your not on the outside looking in.
/r/seduction04/10/14 03:40 PM
3

It also sets the space as yours. And that you take pride in it (if it wasn't already obvious) and take care of stuff you value.
/r/seduction06/08/14 06:00 PM
2

If it was a random post from a random friends, maybe out could be toned down. But not when it's the police shooting things like that. They should know better.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 05:09 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 01:23 AM
3

So if someone violates your body, it's cool because you were drunk? That's just a risk you took? Basically: getting drunk=anyone doing anything to you is fair game? You are arguing a completely different point. And this is exactly how feminists try to prove one point by arguing a completely different one. The English language unfortunately makes it very easy to misinterpret. Take alcohol completely out of the equation for a second. Both parties are sober, was it rape? The answer should be the ex…
/r/MensRights23/07/14 03:33 PM
3

No there isn't. If anyone chooses to get drunk, regardless of how drunk they may be, it was their choice. They have to live with their choices.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 03:25 PM
21

I know you're just playing devils advocate, but the better response against it would be... We're not arguing about someone imposing their will on a drunk. We are arguing that someone who is drunk, is still responsible if they CHOOSE to have sex. Very big difference there. What we are saying is that being drunk in no way changes anything. Either someone forced themselves on you, or you choose to have sex. Being drunk is not relevant in any way. It does not absolve you off your choices. People are…
/r/MensRights23/07/14 03:19 PM
1

One place you will have a huge advantage is life experience. If you play your cards right, people will be jealous of that experience, rather than look down on you for being slightly older. I've noticed personally that people are far more interested in my taking about my self and my past ever since I got out of the Navy. So many more things that I might see as normal or boring, that other people would love to have experienced. Play up that angle.
/r/seduction10/07/14 08:02 PM
1

It's going to happen. Maybe it's just my view on the subject, but I don't think it's anything to worry about. So long as she is 18, is not that big a deal. When it does, playfully tease her about it or something, but don't get too bothered by it. There are plenty of girls that are in 30's, and less mature than the 'younger' girls you are worried about. Same goes for life experience. Outside of legalities don't worry too much about age. Age is only a half decent indicator, and not a perfect predi…
/r/seduction30/06/14 09:16 PM
13

Had a buddy in the marines have this exact thing happen to him when calling the on base help line. He got quite annoyed and took it to his boss. Surprisingly enough it got taken seriously and things changed for the good a little bit (supposedly).
/r/MensRights25/06/14 05:35 PM
8

You forget to mention that leaving (voluntary or not) also hurts your chances of seeing your kids down the road. As well as losing your house to her and the kids. It's not much, but the best thing to do is be the first one to call the cops. Even better if you're the only one (so she does not prepare). Still no guarantees, but your odds get significantly better to not be seen and treated as the bad guy.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 05:33 PM
9

I also have found that if you take sex off the table, 95% of women have literally nothing to offer a man. Holy crap, it is just mind-blowing how utterly dull and trite most women are when they can rely on the promise of pussy. 95% of people. But yes I agree. Far too many relationships revolve around sex, and nothing else. People have a hard time with me explaining that I want more than that in a woman when I break up with a girl that is good looking, as if that's ask that matters. I thought that…
/r/MensRights25/06/14 04:52 PM
2

Exactly the two points I was going to make.
/r/seduction20/06/14 01:43 PM
2

They is a difference between nice and 'nice'. And that's why it gets so misconstrued. 'Nice' is an acceptable way of saying the guy is a dork she wouldn't be caught dead with. Guys who are awesome, give value, are polite and respectful, can get girls. 'Nice' guys who are out of touch with what a girls wants, hoverhand, and are generally a nervous wreck around a pretty girl, do not get girls. This is a big thing that is misunderstood about the seduction community. A large part of the image of sed…
/r/seduction11/06/14 05:46 PM
11

Maybe I'm just weird, but that whole girlie thing of "I just want to go out and dance!" thing applies to me sometimes even though I'm a guy...
/r/seduction07/06/14 12:46 AM
8

I, personally, hate sitting around in a bar doing nothing. This is my thought as well.
/r/seduction07/06/14 12:45 AM
2

My favourite example here is Napoleon Dynamite. He was doing the stupidest shit while dancing. But he went @ 100%. He was fully into it and that's why it worked.
/r/seduction31/05/14 08:25 PM
2

"I was just trying to match your style, I must have succeeded!" *grin
/r/seduction26/05/14 10:32 PM
10

Play up your accent/British-ness. Use words like aluminium, petrol, etc. Under 21 tends to mean Daygame like coffee shops, etc. Even if it's in the evening. I don't know East Coast, but here in California, there are coffee shops, pool halls, etc that cater to under 21 crowds and stay open late. NYC also means clubs are a lot less common from what I here. You're on the east coast, so the ocean is relatively warm compared to what I'm used too. So personally, I'd be heading to the beach if there is…
/r/seduction24/05/14 09:14 PM
4

Give yourself an opening beforehand. Like getting her to come up to hear the music you were talking about earlier, or meet your dog, or sit on the motorcycle or whatever. It's more fluid and natural that way and hopefully you can avoid the part where she feels like she is acting slutty (and therefore more likely to come up even if you both know the real reason).
/r/seduction15/05/14 02:17 AM
3

This is the hardest thing to explain to people who have preconceived notions about this sub. And you seem to have done a damn good job in two sentences.
/r/seduction13/05/14 11:57 PM
1

WTF is this spam bullshit? Link to a link (Use this one simple trick blah blah...) that then tries to stop you from closing the page. Fuck off.
/r/seduction11/05/14 03:55 PM
2

I don't exactly have much experience doing it, but I would imagine just pulling them to the bar/wherever and forcing the situation on them. Then leading the whole night like that. Haha. I know I kind of wish this happened to me when I was younger.
/r/seduction20/04/14 01:39 AM
5

Males tend not to share advice on how to interact women (in my experience). My thought is that because it makes a very clear point that someone is inferior. That someone doesn't know something that is supposed to be the very definition of being a man. Easier to avoid that topic and just play more video games.
/r/seduction20/04/14 12:09 AM
12

Practically everyone has heard of "The Game" Nope, maybe your social circles, but not everyone has heard of it. Especially not the ones who could use it the most. Also, a large portion of those that have heard of it write it (and all of PUA) off as macho-assholery. Things like being an dick gets you girls. PUA has a bad reputation in a lot of places because it's misunderstood and misrepresented. It's seen as a scam to con women into dropping their panties. As if women have no input or choice. Li…
/r/seduction19/04/14 11:28 PM
1

Being a bit new here, I've realized just how bad most guys are at reading signals (by how much I've changed). You might have to be a bit more open at showering your interest from across the room. And think of this... pre-pua, how did you feel about making the approach on a guy? All those insecurities you feel/felt also apply to men. They are just as apprehensive, but because they are expected to make the approach SOME will actually do it (many men go to the bar/club and never approach) at all.
/r/seduction11/04/14 07:02 PM
2

It all hinges on the next few comics. That is where will will be able to see just how devastating it is too the character.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 07:37 PM
2

That was the point, men go through all these things as well. Except society chooses to ignore or make light of it when it's a man's problem instead of taking it seriously when it happens to a woman.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 09:03 PM
1

Initially, there might be some worry on her part. Depending on what she's heard, and from who, it has a bad reputation. But just explain it for what it really is. A way to improve yourself and by extension be more attractive, exciting, etc. If she just cant accept that, then she's got a closed mind, and not worth it anyways (in my eyes).
/r/seduction08/04/14 12:00 AM
1

Great post. Good to see someone proving the 'girls like douches' thing false.
/r/seduction20/03/14 11:55 PM
1

My buddy used to bring along his military issue BCG's to the bar. Birth Control Glasses. Hideous black glasses issued to anyone who needs them in boot camp. He made a facebook page for them and everything. Just like your hat, everyone, girls and guys, wanted to wear them. His only requirement was that people had to get a picture with them to put on the fan page. It helps he's already fairly good looking, and the glasses were so starkly out of place too. This was years back before I knew anything…
/r/seduction23/02/14 10:16 PM
1

As stupid as it is, when a celebrity gets screwed like this, it makes a bigger impact on people's opinions. I feel like I've seen a bunch of these kinds of things on different celebrities. Anyone know of a list that can be linked to when making your point to others?
/r/MensRights20/02/14 10:19 PM
3

The 'Talk to ugly girls' line was a big one for me. Not necessarily ugly, just girls you are not attracted to for whatever reason (or a roommates sister that is off limits). Having a girl tell me how she was into me because I was so confident was a shock. It really hit home how much that indifference works, even for me (who is very much non-confident).
/r/seduction09/02/14 02:57 AM
1

That's exactly what happened.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 11:46 PM
3

A fedora is considered dorky and un-cool becasue it has a reputation of being worn by people who don't understand 'real' fashion. And since it's automatically assumed that you think and/or want to think exactly like this other person, 'Fedora'wearing' is just an insult. They see it as a way to reduce the validity of your claims by associating you with those nerds. It has nothing to do with the fedora's origin, or what is used to be. To be fair, this is not a feminist or even female way of thinki…
/r/MensRights05/01/14 05:52 PM
0

Seriously. Everybody just upvotes it based on the title.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 11:24 PM
1

In the years to come, the US will see eventually see this for what it is. Just like how we now see slavery for what it truly is. The real question is: Will we have learned anything from this, or just move on to another way to be shitty towards each other?
/r/MensRights02/01/14 11:58 PM
2

Damn that is a really good comment. Bravo.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 11:18 PM
4

If she can get in the door part the screaming feminists...
/r/MensRights23/12/13 10:57 PM
5

It only lets you attack someone. Without an accuser you can't have a trial. So nobody will go to jail. All you can do with this tool is anonymously ruin somebody's reputation. That means it's not justice for the person who has been readied, and it doesn't stop it from happening again...
/r/MensRights21/12/13 03:30 PM
2

Of course anyone buying that is an idiot. But that is not the face of feminism that most people see. Outside of reddit, and maybe universities, feminism has a great reputation still. You have to see things from other points of view. Your under the illusion that everything on reddit is common knowledge to the entire country, just because it's common knowledge to you. Non-active feminists don't see much of the hate against men. Just like PETA, they only see the tailored image, and carefully crafte…
/r/MensRights11/12/13 04:15 PM
4

Actually, I don't agree with asking about female staff either. You are saying that the question is OK if you also ask that group there too. When in fact the question should not even be asked to begin with. I don'y don't know jack about the legality (I'm American), but its pretty fucked up...
/r/MensRights11/12/13 12:36 AM
0

You are looking at it through the filter of hindsight. We fully see the KKK for what it is now. Society in general has a much more complete picture of that organization. They are now unable to put a pretty picture forward and misguide people into agreeing with them. When a lot of people honestly believe that blacks are genetically inferior and that keeping them as slaves is beneficial to them (much the way we keep pets), it's not hard to jump to the conclusion that interracial marriage is also b…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:07 PM
5

I wouldn't say all feminists are idiots. Some (a lot?) are just completely ignorant about the reality of the organization they claim to be part of.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 12:47 AM
2

Even if these numbers were accurate (which I agree is unlikely), nobody would ever believe them anyways for exactly those reasons.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 08:36 PM
71

To only censor some hate groups is ridiculous. Either censor them, or don't. Picking sides is what pisses me off. Free speech is a government thing, not corporate. Facebook can censor whatever they want. But if they don't want people to choose not to use their service (because of hate groups), if they want people to use their service, especially kids and people with kids, they can't let things run rampant.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 08:33 PM
2

I guess the difference would be 'does the topic between two females have to be about a woman, or just not about a man (as in schoolwork, or the weather)?'
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:36 PM
2

I see your point. But in that case, if the over all trend is the issue, you can't think that an individual test could even remotely be appropriate as a fix.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:34 PM
1

So Hermione only talks to Ms Beasley, or prof McGonnagal, any of the other female students or teachers or the shape shifter girl in the order in a single movie? I don't remember the movies well, I'm sure I mix the books with the films, but I find this very unlikely.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:27 PM
1

No I don't have a problem with this, because I'd never even notice. Looking back, the last play I saw would have failed your reverse test, I never noticed, because I don't give a shit. It was good, so I didn't look for ways to ruin it. Even if I noticed, I would not care. Either is a good movie or its not. End if story, stop going out of your way to find sexism. And when you do, propose a realistic solution, not this knee jerk bullshit 'test.'
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:06 PM
4

Not sure if I believe the article's list of movies that fail the test. All but one of the Potter movies fail? You're telling me that Hermione only talks to a female in one of the movies?
/r/MensRights06/11/13 06:56 PM
7

Well, I don't think that men should hit a woman ever... So your telling me that when your wife and the mother of your kids has successfully drowned one of your children, and is about to drown the other, you should be careful not to hurt her in the process of making her stop? I assume that you agree that in an extreme case like this, it would be acceptable to hit any person, even a woman? So now that we have decided that in some cases YES you not only can hit a woman, but should hit a woman, we h…
/r/MensRights26/10/13 02:47 AM
1

And either way, you won.
/r/seduction15/10/13 09:01 PM
14

Fuck the label of MRM or MRA, she goes out of her way to NOT alienate men. Who cares if she knows what MRA's are.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 06:16 PM
2

I don't care if there are more of less women in the military risking their lives. Neither does any other MRA. It's only used as a point that feminists only want to force equality when it benefits them. Either this flies over your head, or you are intentionally misunderstanding the point (something that a major portion of feminism is based on). That deliberate misunderstanding is why MRA's get pissed off at them. Women can do any military job a man can do. It's just that the average woman is phys…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 04:43 PM
1

There's nothing wrong with focusing your efforts on one particular subsection of a problem... Spot on. Some problems are very large, and con only be fixed bit by bit. I have no problems with this. And like you said, its when feminists undercut and specifically try to hinder people from other groups having the exact same rights that feminists lose the plot and become the badguy instead.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 12:34 AM
11

Start at the beginning, not at the end. Don't approach with the intent to get a phone number or a date. Crawl before you walk, and all that. Just ask a girl (pretty and not pretty) what time the store closes, say thanks and walk away. Ask where the bread isle is at the supermarket, or whatever. Thank her and disengage. Mission completed. Start to get comfortable with just basic conversation then expand... Eventually you won't feel the need to flee after the interaction, make some kind of follow …
/r/seduction01/10/13 02:29 AM
1

I understand your point, but it's not a choice if one out the other. He can be right, and not be condescending at the same time. He can not give feminists an easy reason to hate him. It would make his points much more valid and respected if he was not being degrading to woman at the same time. Instead people's mind will link men's rights with being an asshole. Not exactly a great way to promote your views.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 02:45 PM
4

The points he makes are perfectly valid and I agree with them. But his way of speaking is not going to win him any friends. He is not the ind of guy I'd want to defend me. He would just make me look like an asshole. Even if he is right.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 04:22 AM
1

Damn I really like that article. One thing though that was missed. Men and women are pretty damn close in numbers that play video games. http://www.theesa.com/facts/gameplayer.asp I wonder how close these numbers are for boys and girls though? I would be interested to see if anyone can find more detailed statistics on what type of games each sex plays and how that differs. My gut tells me that girls do in fact play games less, but mainly that girls are far more likely to play more casual games f…
/r/MensRights10/09/13 08:24 PM
1

I think just like a lot of other things, those that are perceived to be the majority are not allowed to complain about anything, and that -ism's against them are justified. The whole idea that I am male middle class and white suddenly means it is OK to be racist/sexist/etc against me. Because blacks are disadvantaged and more likely to have issues with various things, Affirmative Action is somehow OK? Mandated counter-racism doesn't fix the original racism. It breeds resentment and makes things …
/r/MensRights10/09/13 06:57 PM
1

Here is something for that +3% number, though its part of trying to sell a book, so it's not perfect. Keep in mind Warren Farrell was a well respected name in feminist circles before he started saying things that while true, went against what feminist's wanted to be true. http://www.warrenfarrell.net/Summary/
/r/MensRights09/09/13 11:03 PM
1

A link for /u/kznlol 's response. It's not a perfect source, but thats because it's trying to encourage book sales. From what I understand the book goes into much greater detail. http://www.warrenfarrell.net/Summary/
/r/MensRights09/09/13 11:01 PM
1

Nothing is wrong with them. They don't want to arrest them because they know this may possibly scare actual rape victims away from reporting the crime in case they're not believed and end up arrested themselves. Sorry if everyone misconstrued your words, but thats pretty much what you're saying there. It's a tired (and ridiculous) line directly from the feminist handbook. So it gets this kind of response.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 02:30 PM
6

I agree 100% with you about men needing to speak out against overly lenient sentences against men and women equally. I do think a harsher sentence should be applicable, but definitely not the 10 years that was suggested by the prosecutors. Consent law is 16 in Montana. So it's not a wide a difference as say, California at 18. Judge believes she was in just as much control as the teacher. And that she was older than her age belies. That to me means she was capable of deciding and it was consensua…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 08:39 PM
1

This could be easily attributed to a spokesman trying to not piss off feminists while still attempting to say they still follow the law. Crummy reporting is the cause for quotes like this.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:32 PM
1

That's a bullshit reason. Every rape accusation that does not result in a conviction or even an arrest is not going cause the accused to be arrested instead. Its the constant spouting of bullshit like that that makes people believe this is so. And so it's the people (usually self-proclaimed feminists) that spout this kind of rhetoric that ACTUALLY cause women to be afraid of reporting a rape.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:27 PM
12

The judge had pronounced her verdict. ...her verdict... ...her...
/r/MensRights03/09/13 05:37 PM
3

I've extrapolated a bit, but I agree 100% with the point I think you are trying to make. Women and men will never be doing the same tasks within the same jobs. And so the death rate will always be different. Even when I was in the Navy, females with the exact same rank and rating (job description) were far less likely to be the ones doing the more dangerous stuff. Sometimes because they just physically could not do the work (or feigned to be unable), others because they intentionally get pregnan…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 03:50 PM
30

It's not that any gender is violent, it's that there are no repercussions for one gender.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 04:26 PM
176

I'm no seduction expert. And while I agree that self-professed 'nice guys' bring about their own demise, the examples given here are ridiculous, to the point of confusing the issue into men thinking they don't fall under this umbrella. The articles definition of 'nice guy' seems to be way off. Roses to a coffee date? Seriously? That is not a 'nice guy', that's a socially inept guy. You can be a 'nice guy' and not be that socially clueless. You can be a 'nice guy' and still be confident and socia…
/r/seduction02/09/13 03:32 PM
3

Very common tactic in an argument/debate. Religion especially. Though I would argue that it is no longer a debate when this tactic is used. The argument is a lost cause until peoples emotions are not so hot. They are not actually hearing a word you are saying except on how to dismantle it or side step it. They will never take in a word you say and actually consider it. If you want to keep the debate going you have to calm them down first. And that means you have to stay calm as well. This is par…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:48 PM
1

My best friend lives near his ex-wife. They didn't want to go to court. Even if they can't stand each other, they deal with it for the daughters sake. It was pure personal opinion, but they did not want her to constantly be going back and forth between parents for the obvious reasons. The agreement is that the father has her for summers. Though they live close enough (1-2 hours away?), they meet in a mall at the midpoint. They make it a point to walk through the mall together as a family most ti…
/r/MensRights26/08/13 03:25 PM
3

You're right of course, I just did a bad job explaining my comment. I just meant regardless of where the problem lies, you will still get arrested. Which is not a good thing going into a custody battle.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 09:57 PM
1

First, you can't run. You never be the one to leave the children with the other spouse before a divorce. As a male, you don't need to handicap yourself in trying to get custody, it's already tough enough. Second while you may be justified in retaliating, as shown here even without that, you will be the one going to jail. All she has to do is say she felt threatened and everything is your fault. Retaliating only makes your stay longer. Don't get me wrong, defense and jail is better than death, bu…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 07:28 PM
3

While that's true, saying that to the officer arresting you won;t change anything.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 07:23 PM
2

And the other 10% of the guilt would come from other women. Men don't give a shit if you buy a diamond ring for yourself. They would only notice what finger it's on to gauge whether you're married or not when you're at the bar.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:46 PM
1

Oh god that's awesome. I would pay money to see someone do this (so long as it to a deserving target).
/r/seduction23/08/13 04:28 PM
5

Love the quote at the very end: "I believe the time has come to acknowledge that the practice of routine circumcision rests on the absurd premise that the only mammal in creation born in the condition that requires immediate surgical correction is the human male." Thomas Szasz, M.D
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:03 PM
3

Here in /r/MensRights what you said is EXACTLY how the bulk of users feel. We don't have anything against woman's equality. But equality at the expense of someone else rights is not equality. And that is something that a lot of feminists with power justify doing.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:52 PM
1

Whatever your stance is it should be the same in both cases. This is what I see as the primary difference between current feminists and current MRA's. A lot of feminists, or at least a lot of those with political/cultural power do not agree with your statement. They may say it for the camera. But they do not believe it in practice. This is because it's not about people any more, its about control and/or making money. No different than PETA really. Someone finds a way to exploit and make money of…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 03:51 PM
3

Best English class I had in high school, teacher let us read any bestselling book we wanted. Then we used those books to write our papers on. I kinda cheated and usually choose books I already knew pretty well. But it didn't stop me from studying those books with a different view and learning a lot. It was actually a lot of fun to study a book like Ender's Game instead of the usual crap nobody was interested in. One jock guy thought he was being cute by choosing something like Berenstain Bears. …
/r/MensRights12/08/13 03:36 PM
1

The only important factor is how the self-identified victim felt about it... By using the past tense you imply that the decision to call sex rape can be made after sex takes place. That is absolutely 100% false. It's not only false it's extremely dangerous. This is exactly what leads to false rape accusations and the use of rape threats to gain control over someone. It also leads to people regretting sex and then falling back to the excuse that it was rape to protect their own reputation. The ac…
/r/MensRights12/08/13 01:58 AM
1

I get that your just playing devil's advocate, but I still feel the need to respond because it is a common argument. This is the kind of stupid bullshit arguments that I hate to even have to respond too. Of course it's rape. But your intentionally leaving out the other half the date where one person has already intimidated the other into feeling forced to obey. The lack of consent is no different than an agreement when it's forced. There is a lot more going on here than just one person's lack of…
/r/MensRights11/08/13 03:32 PM
5

Ridiculous. Kids were bullied no matter what they were, smart, dumb, in band, in sports, cheerleaders, whatever. Socially inept kids got the brunt of it, regardless of gender or social group.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 09:36 PM
5

I would be less nervous about making a cold approach than dancing on an empty dance floor... But one time, just for the hell of it, I tagged along with friends to a goth club. Not normally my thing, but what the hell, right? Since I cared little about what anyone there thought, or that I'd ever see them again, I had less issue than normal going out onto a relatively empty dance floor. And sure enough I got the approaches instead. Granted 2 out of 3 were other guys, I took the compliment for what…
/r/seduction01/08/13 08:37 PM
10

Yes. I do. When there is no evidence to the contrary, and someone jumps to that conclusion and chooses to be offended, I definitely blame them. I notice how you ignore my far more appropriate comparison of a gay pride parade. How is that any different from the slut walk? Edit: If you have some kind of evidence that this guy was being a douche, please show it, I'll happily agree that he was being disrespectful. but the ONLY evidence we've heard is that a man held a sign in support. That's it. Unt…
/r/MensRights31/07/13 02:21 AM
5

An equivalent to this is a gay pride parade... An equivalent to this is a gay pride parade would be a straight person walking alongside them with a sign saying I love gays. ...fixed that for ya. A group of people call themselves something. A person who does not identify with that group shows up with a sign saying he loves that group. That's what happened at this slutwalk. Instead of seeing a man with a sign supporting your ability to "reclaim your sexual identity," you CHOOSE to see a man degrad…
/r/MensRights31/07/13 02:09 AM
2

I'd say it's less about the sex of the asker, and more about the sex of the person being asked. Even men that decline are more likely to take it as a compliment than as an insult. Women are far more likely to be insulted by the question. Being 'creepy' isn't something someone does/acts. It's how the other person views/judges someone else.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 04:24 PM
4

May or may not be technically true. Problem is, a lot of DV fights end up in his word vs. her word. And because of this it's all left up to interpretation. Right or wrong, this means a lot more things will be taken into account. Everything from how pretty the female 'used' to be, to how relatively physically unhurt you look. How good she is at crying. If she bruises easily, you will look even worse. All this before any intentional sexism takes place. If she is a 6 foot bodybuilder woman and he i…
/r/MensRights30/07/13 04:04 PM
1

Some women think they are immune to any sort of retaliation. They think there are no consequences for being a bitch just because they are female. This is the kind of thing over-reaching feminists are creating with their message.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 09:37 PM
1

Maybe she was yelling and he stuck his forearm in her mouth? Joking aside, I'm sure they meant that the argument was an accident/mistake/misunderstanding/whatever BS excuse. Fight broke out, he held her down (she got bruises), she had no limbs left to flail with so she bit him.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 09:34 PM
2

A lot of people just can't comprehend that some people actually want something for BOTH sides. It's not they don't agree with the middle ground, it's not that they reject the idea of middle ground (for that they would have to recognize that such a thing even exists before discounting it as a bad choice/idea). Us vs them, black vs white, good vs evil, etc. Thats the only two options even available. So thinking in that way, anyone who defends a man for any reason must therefore be against women. S…
/r/MensRights18/07/13 09:33 PM
2

I would welcome it myself. It would make for less of a near-circle jerk that we have he. When it's all people with the same opinion it can feel pointless, like preaching to the choir. That said I would not even have a problem with self professed feminists commenting here. So long as everyone stops the hate and looks at facts and truth. Though that's a tall order there, for both sides.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 03:33 PM
11

Since I had to look it up, I might as well post it: Vexatious litigation is legal action which is brought, regardless of its merits, solely to harass or subdue an adversary. It may take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be the repetitive, burdensome, and unwarranted filing of meritless motions in a matter which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action. Filing vexatious litigation is considered an abuse of the judicial process and may result in sanctions against the offender.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 04:20 PM
3

But this whole not blaming victims and educating men regarding consent thing has not sat well with everybody. Men’s Rights Edmonton has countered with its own campaign, telling women, “Don’t Be That Girl.” Because there is no way there could ever possible be two issues that should try to be solved. Therefore MRA poster must be a 'counter' to the first, not alongside.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:50 PM
10

“I don't see any factual allegations that males as a general rule are being picked on,” she said. “The process seems to be gender bias-free.” “I don't see any factual allegations that blacks as a general rule are being picked on,” the grand wizard said. “The process seems to be race bias-free.” “I don't see any factual allegations that females as a general rule are being picked on,” he said. “The process seems to be gender bias-free.” “I don't see any factual allegations that gays as a general r…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 04:34 PM
6

I just don't understand what it would take for her to stop being vindictive, and to be a good mother? Her only thoughts are about herself and how she can gain some kind of advantage. She is using her son as a weapon in this fight, it does not even occur to her to think about how it affects her son. Maybe pointing this out to CPS or the latest judge (or whomever) would have an affect on their understanding of your situation. In a way you can leverage all that "mothers are better with kids" belief…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 04:24 PM
1

(got linked here from the update post) Damn, for such a short statement that hit really hard. Well said /u/SuperUppercut .
/r/MensRights11/07/13 04:00 PM
5

If MRAs want to be taken seriously then they have to start doing things properly. I don't know the specific situation. But what happens when MRA asks for permission to post them and it is denied? Do MRA's just meekly stand by and not do anything because they are 'not allowed too'? Yea that will get change started... Open your eyes and look at the real world. NOTHING on the MRA version of the poster was offensive or had any hate in it. AT ALL. It was no more offensive than a lost dog poster. Femi…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:28 PM
6

Exactly. A lot of Right wing christians do the same thing in the US. War on christmas, etc...
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:12 PM
3

I just don’t want to get married, get divorced and have a guy kick me to the curb or I move into an apartment. If a prenup let’s him keep all his money, then I’d rather not continue staying with someone like that. And if that’s what a prenup is, why get married at all? Not that I’m marrying for money... Wow... Just wow... Glad to see most (though not all) of the comments agree that the woman there is a harpy.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 06:56 PM
23

They intend to, or are at least open to, exploiting you. Spot on.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 03:43 PM
29

Nothing scares a feminist more than equality. Very true.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 03:28 PM
3

Hairy fire truck!
/r/MensRights07/07/13 12:27 AM
17

Yea, thats absolutely ridiculous. It makes any meaningful comparison nearly impossible.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 03:30 PM
1

Exactly. Recodring with his cell phone obviously, will either make her back off of give you the defense you need. And far more likely to be perfectly legal.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 03:03 PM
10

What she is saying is that those volunteers were guilted into volunteering. Or at least some portion of them.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:12 PM
1

It's a sad state of affairs when something like this is the best option... Depressing really.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 08:02 PM
6

Its a parody site sure, but a couple weeks ago there was a video here done by undercover reporters of this exact thing. Proving that this story while fake, is completely truthful.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 04:57 PM
1

It's been too long for me to find the exact place, but this can be read in a day (it looks longer than it is) and give you a good understanding of how taking up space, and similar things can be used to your advantage. There is a lot of business stuff as well, but it's all relevant to understanding how men and women read body language. http://westsidetoastmasters.com/resources/book_of_body_language/toc.html
/r/seduction30/05/13 04:39 PM
4

How can you have a rational discussion on the issues females deal with while excluding males completely? You can't. Because that's not the intention. The intention is to have a place for women to have a place they can spout half formed ideas and repeat bigoted and verifiably false claims/comments against men and have people agree with them. By excluding men they are saying the intent of this room is to create a safe place for women to be sexist against men. By having this room, not only are they…
/r/MensRights28/05/13 07:31 PM
3

Maybe it's different elsewhere, but every LGBT area/room/group/whatever that I've seen specifically did not restrict admittance to just LGBT people. In fact they do the exact opposite on purpose. They want to expand awareness of the issues they face. They actively encourage straight people to join on be part of the group. If you don't want to be excluded from the majority, don't exclude everyone that is part of the majority.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 07:11 PM
1

Exactly. They provide spaces for specific cultures or GLBT areas, whatever. But NONE of those forcibly restrict admittance to just that culture/group. In fact they do the EXACT OPPOSITE quite purposefully. Those groups want to fix issues, or encourage awareness of their issues. Hiding behind closed doors does not do this.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 07:05 PM
6

I don't see a problem with a male centric space that appeals to the average male. It would most likely be just guys anyway. But why forced segregation of the sexes? what does that accomplish? If you want to be away from the other sex that's your prerogative, go to a less public place. Like your house. What goes on in these rooms that there is a need to forcibly segregate the sexes? I'm assuming discussion of issues relating to your sex, correct? Segregating the sexes is NOT going to solve any is…
/r/MensRights28/05/13 06:59 PM
1

I understand the point you're saying, and even agree with it a bit in theory. But at the same time, we've already proven that "separate but equal" never works out as intended: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separate_but_equal#Rejection Specifically "We conclude that, in the field of public education, the doctrine of "separate but equal" has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal."
/r/MensRights28/05/13 06:46 PM
2

Don't use the word educated. That can be mistaken as educated in general. Maybe over-reaching feminists? Or something like that. Specifically point out that your views come as a reaction to those feminists that don't want equality, but those that think "Women were second class before, now we need to make men second class (as opposed to equal). Don't dismiss inequalities that women have. But point out that men also have inequalities as well, except (almost) nobody is standing up for them. Edit: R…
/r/MensRights09/05/13 07:57 PM
3

I followed through to the angrydad link and that was heartbreaking. If what little I read is indicative of his normal posts, I have a huge amount of respect for him putting his life/situation out in public like that.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 07:15 PM
1

I lot of these facts don't have a fair comparison to make them meaningful in anyway. "A child from a fatherless home is 10.8 times more likely to commit rape." 10.8 times more than what? 2 parent homes? A motherless home? The bottom left grid had info about single mothers compared to 2 parent families, but not single fathers. Do single fathers fare better? Or are these numbers primarily because its just a single parent? When both parents are equally incompetent, judges tend to put the kids with …
/r/MensRights09/05/13 06:37 PM
3

Another thing that I think applies as well... When a woman is intimidated by good looks, it's cute. To watch her stutter or swoon or whatever. When a man does it, it is usually very unflattering and can be the sole reason a woman rejects an approach.
/r/seduction09/05/13 06:09 PM
6

I'm not a parent, but I have a friend who's gone through this at a less severe level. My suggestions... I assume legally you're supposed to be getting certain amount of time with them? Use it. Make dinner at your place and let them do the talking. Keep it calm and civil. Even if it's just letting them vent at you. Let them express their feelings and the 'WHY' behind then resentment. Even if you already know it, let them explain it. Let them do the talking. That alone could help a lot. Don't let …
/r/MensRights07/05/13 08:51 PM
1

It stems from a couple things, chief among them is an overreaction from the inequality of women in the past. Fear-mongering from the media is also a huge part of it. Reddit included. Whats the ratio of good news stories to bad and your front page? Even with /r/upliftingnews it is almost guaranteed to be outweighed just by Indian rape articles. Stranger-danger has gotten out of control. Depending on your age or where you grew up, a lot of people can see the difference in how your next door neighb…
/r/MensRights07/05/13 04:56 PM
6

Just as there are plenty of girls with small breasts that pull stunning guys. Its a generality, by definition it's not 100% true.
/r/seduction22/04/13 08:43 PM
1

I worked with a very similar girl at Starbucks years ago... Good times.
/r/seduction03/04/13 10:42 PM
2

Don't worry about being awkward, because in all honestly the awkward part is not a bad thing. It really isn't. Blushing? Who cares, again, it's not a bad thing, it's just a non-verbal compliment. If you worry about it, or make a deal out of it might become uncomfortable. Embrace that blush, or that stupid comment. Own it. Own that shit! You do that and even if you do look awkward, it will be seen as extremely cute, a turn on. Just like guys, when a girl sees, not hears, actually sees that you ar…
/r/seduction27/03/13 10:53 PM
1

I am the same way. I just go with it. In a way it's a great non-verbal compliment. It's only a bad thing if you get embarrassed by it. If someone calls you out on it, re-enforce it instead of defending/hiding it.
/r/seduction11/03/13 04:07 PM
1

I doubt this girl has ever been taken on a nice date by a guy with goals, ambitions or a future. And after reading the rest of the FR, it seems to be true. She's used to thinking she is the prettiest/richest/coolest person in the room where ever she goes. Proving to her she's not would be something unexpected to her. Isn't half this subreddit about this exact topic. Don't be one of the crowd, stand out and get noticed. This is a perfect DHV (Demonstration of Higher Value) which she could probabl…
/r/seduction10/01/13 05:10 PM
2

Sounds like knowing she had a boyfriend and therefore wasn't available made it easy to not care about the results. Able to just have fun with it regardless of the outcome since you already knew the score.
/r/seduction08/01/13 04:23 PM
0

He didn't end up hooking up with them, so it's more of a "all in good fun' type of thing.
/r/seduction07/01/13 08:48 PM
1

I think the difference in 'seduction' and just understanding how to be comfortable around a person are very similar. Teach you kids to be social and try to get them to actually enjoy it if possible. Not to be a drama queen or whore, just how to enjoy being around people. They can take that knowledge and expand as they grow older, but being social is a huge boon that can be taught without hesitation.
/r/seduction04/01/13 02:05 AM
112

If you can't laugh at yourself, people will laugh at you. If you can laugh at yourself, people will laugh with you.
/r/seduction02/01/13 08:09 PM
1

Can't agree more. You have many years of girlfriends to look forward too. Have fun. And if you haven't heard the proverb before: "It's better to ask forgiveness than permission"
/r/seduction18/12/12 10:44 PM
3

Agreed. It's fun, doesn't have any strings attached (forced intimacy), a little competitive, and leaves openings for conversation unlike movies or music. It's also a good launch pad to go somewhere else after it it's going well. And while it's out in the open, it can still be semi-private depending on the course. Where I live, there is a small (8 holes) indoor mini golf place right near downtown (Movies, music, coffee, shopping, restaurants). Makes it very easy to transition to another place or …
/r/seduction18/12/12 09:41 PM
1

As hard a time I have with it myself, he's right. Co-worker in Florida: Huge guy, prolly just under 6 ft, and fat as hell, like 300lb easy. I called him Mr Personality. Confident as hell, and just plain comfortable everywhere, incuding around beautiful women. He was dating a stripper when I moved back to California.
/r/seduction18/12/12 07:58 PM
1

You have to be able to let go. No inhibitions about how you look. Find the right music and you might not be able to hold back. Whether its a waltz, Akon or Switchblade Symphony, the right music changes everything. I didn't dance, never have, too inhibited to enjoy it. Then Dance Dance Dance Revolution came to the local mall (I was around 20 at the time). I played the hell out of it. I was sure I looked like a fool (skinny white boy moving only his feet to j-pop), but it was too much fun to care,…
/r/seduction18/12/12 05:27 PM
2

I wouldn't say its hard my any means, but a lot of people are unwilling to do it, or figure out how to do it, or are scared of it. It can be pretty simple (but not always), quite a few people don't know that though. Also, it's 'fixing' a car/physical labor, therefore 'a man's work' to a lot of people.
/r/seduction18/12/12 05:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter