TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Quarri Archive

View 0 posts and 33 comments by Quarri on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No source not picture, makes me sad.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 06:49 PM
5

I don't think I have ever read or heard of a story were a schools attempt to tone down girls sexuality has ever gone over well with parents. Why has it been decided that tights are the same thing as pants?
/r/MensRights03/04/14 03:01 PM
1

Thank you for sharing this well written article
/r/MensRights27/03/14 03:27 PM
1

Sign up. show up. See what happens.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 11:40 PM
1

Top of page says book is called history of ideas about women or some such. Is there a competing perspective presented in the book? If there isn't I would love for you to ask the professor why not and post the answer s/he gives.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 01:40 AM
1

At what time is a man's experience important in you mind? Is there ever a time? Genuinely curious
/r/MensRights14/02/14 10:51 PM
1

I am asking why the guys experience in the events was not included in the story. the lack of his experience is an example of men not having a voice in situations were they damn well should have a voice. Why on earth are you typing about apples and oranges and math? I am saying the lack of the mans experience is a problem. You disagree?
/r/MensRights14/02/14 10:07 PM
-1

Being drunk in and of itself is not determinative of nonconsent or non-agency the above does not contradict the authors second statement of: being forced to have sex ...[while] being totally wasted and passed out, would be rape I am arguing that 'passed out drunk' is a 'state of drunkenness' and therefore the two assertions are contradictory. being drunk has a variety of levels (states). so: passed out drunk = state of drunkenness tipsy = state of drunkenness etc. the fact that I can interpret t…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 09:54 PM
0

my argument is that the article is very poorly written. I am not commenting on feminism, I am not talking about men, or the validity of the argument. I am arguing that the article by AVFMS is very, very poorly written, the way he constructed his augment is a contradiction and 1 of 2 examples I gave of why it is poorly written. I am not arguing against what he said, I am arguing that he said it poorly Being passed out does not have to be unique to being drunk for 'passed out drunk' to be a state …
/r/MensRights14/02/14 09:37 PM
0

we do not know how drunk the guy was because the story doesn't tell us. I think that is a problem. 'black out drunk' or mildly drunk, sober, high, ect. are what we don't know about the guy because we were not told anything about him
/r/MensRights14/02/14 09:33 PM
0

I'm just gunna quote the damn story cause I keep utterly failing at retyping the words in it. Winerip recounts one successful intervention that was more forthright: Matt Martel [was on] a taxi ride home with a friend and a very drunk woman they'd met at a UMass party. "The two of them were touching, cuddling, it was obvious she was down for whatever," says Mr. Martel, a junior. "She'd lost her inhibitions to the point that it really seemed like a good idea for her to go home with this guy she ha…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 02:59 PM
0

I miss remembered when I made the post the friend said totally wasted. It then describes her experiences the following day, poor memory and regret. The experience of The guy who was with her is completely relevant to an accurate understanding of the story.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 05:23 AM
-3

Furthermore, even when a woman is wasted and passed out, it's not the drunken state that negates her consent. It's the fact that she is passed out. being wasted and passed out is a state of drunkenness as you can only consume so much alcohol before you pass out. writing that passed out drunk is the only level of drunkenness that prevents the ability to consent is not a contradiction, what the author wrote is
/r/MensRights14/02/14 05:10 AM
-1

The author wrote that a persons state of drunkenness can not determine an ability to consent or to not consent. that is, not matter how drunk you are you are still able to consent to having things done to you. he follows this with. if you are so drunk you have passed out you are unable to consent to sex. in other words he argues that a persons state of drunkenness (the amount that makes you pass out) does in fact in and of itself determine non-agency. This contradicts his previous assertion that…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 05:07 AM
-9

this article is terrible, very poorly written. the one it links to is interesting though. two exaples of why it is a terrible article 1) the AVFMS article contradicts itself a person’s state of drunkenness is not in and of itself determinative of nonconsent and non-agency in regards to his/her actions then says: being forced to have sex ...[while] being totally wasted and passed out, would be rape written another way "if you are too drunk to consent to sex or someone has sex with your body while…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 12:36 AM
-1

From what I have read in books on the subject the crisis of masculinity is the argument that the antisocial actions such as suicide, heavy drinking, excessive violence etc that men perform are caused by their narrow understanding of masculinity.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 08:53 PM
-3

what should I do? take her section out of the video. You have no proof that she agreed to have her interview published. Next time you make a video I suggest you include a written consent form which includes something along the lines of: by signing this form you consent to have this interview posted to YouTube and edited in order keep the video to a manageable length. The greatest effort will be taking to keep your responses and opinions in context and accurate to the situation. Upon uploading of…
/r/MensRights25/01/14 08:54 PM
1

Can you point out were I was judging please?
/r/MensRights13/01/14 02:28 PM
1

I don't give a crap what the guy does. Consciously objecting to a pervasive societal norm (interacting and working with women in this case) will have consequences. The man is not physically or emotionally harmed by being excluded from this class and his belief has not prevented him from being able to graduate (at least not so far as the article has stated), so there is no argument for change in regard to harm. It may inconveniences him, in that he has to find another course to take. their is not…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 06:27 AM
1

You didn't answer my question
/r/MensRights13/01/14 04:49 AM
1

what do female only spaces being numerous in a university environment have to do with a man wanting to avoid women in a public locations? I also do not understand how what you typed is supposed to make sense as a response to me saying 'not taking the class is an option that allows the man to maintain his distance from women.' (hope I am being clearer enough now)
/r/MensRights13/01/14 04:28 AM
0

What does that have to do with a man wanting to avoid women in a public locations? Edit: what does that have to do with what I typed?
/r/MensRights13/01/14 02:50 AM
-1

the guy could always take a different class. He can follow his nonsensical beliefs without the professor accommodating him. Why does his belief in separation of genders trump the professors belief in genders working together.
/r/MensRights12/01/14 06:54 PM
1

Article basically says, look at these poorly cited ways men and boys are having problems in society. To fix these problems we should policy people into staying in heterosexual marriages. What a load of crap. If staying in unhappy marriages solved problems people wouldn't get divorced.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 01:49 AM
2

I understand the author to be ok with female sexuality when the female being sexual is in control of her own sexuality and against men using her sexuality in a way that takes away her personal control over it. Aka that Thick sunger guy.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 04:54 AM
7

This has nothing to do with men rights. why are the comments defending the use of the label non white when it has nothing to do with men's rights, is clearly racist and a poor descriptor to use when trying to identify the color of a person's skin?
/r/MensRights21/12/13 05:04 PM
2

This article talks about replying percentage for under 6ft without comparing it to over 6ft. We don't know if the reply rate for over 6ft is any better. So the information presented is useless. Also 5ft 6inch is average so anything above that could be considered tall. Edit: the article does not say being tall is biologically more attractive. It says it indicates the same things in many cultures.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 02:52 PM
4

Just to add to your point. A non racist, egalitarian minded white male still benefits from from the structure even though he doesn't agree with it. I wish the article had explained why the three students didn't get that.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 03:23 AM
1

what was her motivation? if you don't mind me asking
/r/MensRights19/11/13 03:57 AM
4

http://books.google.ca/books?id=RU1TxFTKx4oC&printsec=frontcover&dq=maine+body+wars&hl=en&sa=X&ei=NHeBUtb_J6OziwLTzYHQDg&ved=0CDEQuwUwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false its on page 152 - bottom of page footnotes, so you can't see the source the author writes in the paragraph above "27% of female rape victims never tell anyone." the stat can't be correct, as you need to tell someone about the rape to be counted.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 01:00 AM
2

having to gather evidence has absolutely nothing to do with how a victim of sexual assault feels. It is obvious that evidence is useful to solving a case. This does not mean that the victim can not feel that degraded or uncomfortable when being swabbed or that reporters should not tell people that the victim felt degraded. The article did not insinuate that the hospital should not have checked for evidence because the victim felt uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 04:19 AM
5

is rape a special crime different from all others? duh, so is murder, theft, extortion and so on. That is why they have different names. it is not distressing, unpleasant or specially degrading... With the host of emotional and mental health issues suffered by rape victims I am confused how you can think this Anyone who thinks rape is distressing someone being forced to kill their own child is distressing and traumatic to the person. That does not hold any barring on a rape victims trauma
/r/MensRights11/11/13 03:13 AM
6

they still have problems that are prevalent like North Korea
/r/MensRights09/11/13 03:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter