TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

QueSeraSerape Archive

View 0 posts and 118 comments by QueSeraSerape on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
32

I'm reading one of Warren Farrell's books right now. He's much more conciliatory and understanding than I expected, almost to a fault. If he got that treatment at the U of T, I cannot even imagine the reception that Paul Elam would get.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:24 AM
6

That's a pretty big red flag, so good choice.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 07:44 PM
2

I bought his book "The Myth of Male Power" and have started reading it. It's pretty good so far. I will likely be buying more of his other books after I finish it.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 07:22 PM
12

It's like one of those 4chan stories. "It's my privilege"
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:33 PM
11

Someone in my local community was poisoned by his wife during their divorce. He almost died, but still refused to press charges. No charges have been filed.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 05:28 PM
1

I'm talking about other people having weapons. I would hate to end up with a knife in my side trying to break up a fight.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 09:39 PM
2

Size doesn't matter that much when people can carry weapons.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 09:35 PM
3

I am not a paid bodyguard; I'm sure as hell not a volunteer bodyguard.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 09:33 PM
1

A while back, someone posted a link in SRD (or maybe aSRS) to New York law claiming that you were incapable of becoming legally unable to consent from anything you purposefully consume. I don't know how common laws like that are (or even if that law is applicable to all situations).
/r/MensRights22/01/13 04:34 AM
14

There's a difference between issues determined by solely by biology and issues determined solely by society. I can't get cervical cancer because I am a man, but there's no reason women aren't signed up for the draft in my country other than because it's the will of the electorate.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 08:11 PM
2

There's also a decision tree for change. I don't think that change will come for some of our issues (the draft, disparate sentencing, the bias in family court, the extreme power family court holds, etc.) until everyone can suffer it. If the draft included men and women, it never would have happened for Vietnam.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 05:28 PM
25

That makes another issue for women (not being taken seriously in a professional setting) even worse. When you have an assumption that someone didn't compete fairly for their job, you end up assuming they are incompetent, or at least not as competent as everyone else.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 05:36 PM
3

I don't think it's the only reason (I think she really did want to help), but it does provide a target on your back for a sharp blade. Then again, that goes with anyone who has something to gain from hurting you. You can either not open up and let your issues rot or you can trust someone and try and fix things. Either way, you run a risk.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 04:43 PM
38

Opening up to my ex-wife just provided her a diagram of exactly where to strike me next time she was angry at me (or using me as a punching bag for her other issues). It sucks.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 03:09 PM
2

Yet a Dworkin article was posted in 2XC comments the other day and highly upvoted and agreed on.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 06:08 PM
-5

As long as prominent feminist groups publish newsletters decrying the MRM, almost everything we do is related to opposing feminism, or at least the organized form of it.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 06:06 PM
13

Only admins can shadow ban, not moderators.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 06:02 PM
2

Gunmetal.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 09:27 PM
1

Scrabble, Bible names edition, would be insanely high scoring.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 04:26 AM
16

I hope you realize you just equated "feminists" with "women". I don't know if it was on purpose, but that's one of the most common strawman arguments I see against MRAs.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 02:45 PM
9

The irony of calling a system that specifically doesn't give a damn about helping fathers the "patriarchy" is incredible.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 02:43 PM
5

Look online for the history of the Tender Years Doctrine. It was one of the earlier significant legal reforms pushed by feminists and advocated custody for the mother (except in extreme circumstances) during the formative "Tender Years" of childhood. Anytime feminists blame the patriarchy for the idea that women are more nurturing and are the only truly essential parent, call them out on it. That's a feminist idea, and if they want to disavow the actions of feminists in order to blame the patria…
/r/MensRights07/01/13 02:42 PM
3

I seem to remember reading accounts of working class men back in the 1800s in England that were quite involved in their children when they weren't working. I also know that as far back as my father's generation, fathers were respected by society and were spent quite a bit of time with their children, whether that took the form of being outdoors, helping with chores/projects, or sports. The stereotype of the uninvolved father, coming home from work and drinking alone in his study/living room, onl…
/r/MensRights07/01/13 02:16 PM
2

Money is a form of power, but is much easier to trace.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 04:59 PM
5

Keeping the things that are yours, yours, and being your own master (having power over your own life) are things worth fighting for. It's not a bad thing to look out for your own interests.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 04:36 PM
9

A few years back, in my naive teen years, I entered a political discussion with my grandfather. He listened to my point, thought for a moment, and told me I was wrong. I asked why, and he said he would leave that up to me to figure out, but he would give me one hint. He said that the vast majority of people act as if they have one concern, and that is money and power, regardless of how they dress it up to justify it to themselves. He was so right it isn't even funny.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 02:58 PM
11

The majority of voters are women.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 08:09 PM
9

Are men even depicted as happy with their status as idiot overgrown children?
/r/MensRights03/01/13 06:05 PM
1

I no longer consider myself a Republican or part of the organized church because neither of these groups have a reputation worth defending even if I agree with part of their views.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:07 AM
12

I think his point is that men don't have to apologize for the actions of other men since we don't choose to be men. Being a feminist is a choice though, so it doesn't provide the same cover from the reputation/actions of other members of that group.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 08:31 PM
24

I gave up on /r/feminism when a comment thread about rape had a claim that rape jokes do more to contribute to rape culture than the dismissal of the idea that men can be raped by women. It was upvoted (with no downvotes) and my questions for clarifications were downvoted. I have no interest in playing nice to our detriment with such a bigoted group.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 05:58 AM
1

Stainless steel ones look nicer and are in wealthier homes, from what I've seen.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:06 PM
2

That might be another type of apex fallacy. There were quite a few men that I knew in college that couldn't cook at all. There were quite a few women as well, but there was societal pressure on them to learn and many of them that were attempting to learn. So, just because the top chefs are men doesn't mean that the average man doesn't need to know how to be self-sufficient enough to cook his own food.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 08:05 PM
-1

True, but don't kid yourself that it will teach anyone how to cook anything that is remotely healthy. I learned to cook for myself in a kitchen, not playing with toys trying to give myself diabetes.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 04:26 PM
4

From what I know of easy bake ovens and from the website, they aren't really a tool for teaching how to cook healthy anything. I do recommend every man (and really everyone) to learn how to cook some tasty vegetables. It's hard to have a healthy diet without them.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 03:40 PM
1

Their advice would likely start out involving assessing your relationships to see which are toxic and which are healthy, and either modifying the toxic ones or cutting them off.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 08:54 PM
1

The threat of court ordered payments is a big deal for groups of people subject to the threat of debtor's prisons (you can get thrown in jail if you can't or won't make child support payments).
/r/MensRights17/12/12 07:32 PM
7

I have /u/thebeebopbooper tagged as "SRS, supports doxxing of VA".
/r/MensRights14/12/12 07:13 PM
3

You have the privilege of being ignored or mocked if you somehow didn't get the headstart that some groups assume you automatically have based on your label.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 02:04 AM
6

That's why I have a hard time believing in the idea that the US has a rape culture issue. People would sooner forgive a murderer than a rapist.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 02:01 AM
32

I use it in my fountain pens.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 06:55 PM
1

I would be shocked. I thought they were just a group of morons trying to spam their way into making money.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 04:08 PM
3

There have been a few local deaths involving a single car, driven by a man that had alcohol in his system, where he lost control on a straight road at high speeds and plowed into trees. I wonder if those were really drunk driving accidents or suicides.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 03:23 PM
3

I have no idea how you could even begin to put a number to the times that has happened. How would you separate it from the legitimate calls to the police?
/r/MensRights11/12/12 03:20 PM
5

No, I meant rates on whether or not marriages ended in divorce broken down by which partner earned more.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:26 PM
3

Does anyone have any stats on divorce rates comparing which partner earns more?
/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:02 PM
2

I view it sort of like organized religion. I have met some fantastic people involved in churches, but I am not a fan of churches or organized religion. I have met some fantastic people who identify as feminists, but I'm not a supporter of "feminism".
/r/MensRights05/12/12 02:50 PM
31

No, the power is now loose, like a snaking unhindered fire hose on full blast.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 03:54 PM
2

I seem to remember a warning on the Creepy Crawler set, something about the molds containing lead. I would not advise eating off of them. edit: On further reflection, it may have been one of those California warnings.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 02:17 PM
2

My sister got one, and I got a Creepy Crawler oven. We both ended up playing with the Creepy Crawler oven more since we could use the real kitchen under adult supervision if we wanted to make food.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 02:16 PM
2

Some try to separate gender feminists from equity feminists (using those labels).
/r/MensRights03/12/12 06:11 PM
3

I saw someone asking why we don't all just found and fund some men's shelters for DV if it's such a big deal for us. That completely disregards the fact that most DV shelters are already funded by tax dollars.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 09:14 PM
1

I know a few feminists, and I can't hold the same kinds of conversations with them as I can for other people for other politically charged topics. I quit discussing gender issues with one when they brought out the whole "power + prejudice = sexism" issue to explain why affirmative action style policies to get more women in engineering were okay, but doing the same for getting more men into college wasn't. This is a person who is a gender studies major, works at planned parenthood, and considers …
/r/MensRights30/11/12 03:55 PM
-1

My two male friends were asked by some of their women friends in a feminist group at a local college to help move some furniture for a set for a feminist play/event of some kind. I found that hysterically funny.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 03:44 PM
1

Is it really fear mongering when similar things have happened to our parents, uncles, neighbors, or friends? I consider the things posted here to be worst case scenarios, but they have great utility in planning for the future.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 05:46 PM
3

Don't tell that to /r/barefootrunning.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 02:55 AM
2

What part of the world do you live in? Maybe one of us can offer some assistance or at least a sympathetic ear.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 04:16 PM
6

I have yet to see it in a post on reddit that wasn't attempting to use it to shame someone or silence someone.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 02:40 PM
0

This is for ranting, blowing off steam, and general complaints about misandry. The idea behind this subreddit is to make MensRights focus more on major social inequalities that men face in today's world, rather than posts that focus on minor annoyances of misandry. This subreddit is where posts like this belong. This is the sidebar for /r/MensRants. It was set up so that /r/MensRights wouldn't be cluttered with non-issues.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 03:20 AM
1

This might be better suited for /r/mensrants.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 08:08 PM
3

No, the crematoria were normal sized and were used on bodies, not to kill. They did use poison gas though. This person is just a holocaust denier.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 05:24 PM
6

It wasn't the ability to do whatever job, it was the obligation to do whatever job you could find that would keep you employed.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 04:34 PM
8

Some might see calling others manginas as trying to shame feminine men, but I think that's more of a matter of not understanding the insult.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 04:33 PM
1

I told someone this past weekend I considered myself something of an anti-feminist, to shocked faces. I went on to explain that I'm all for equality, I'm not against someone being a feminist, I'm just against what organized feminists have actually done in some areas. I compared it to being against the church but not against people believing in a higher power. That took the look of shock off their faces and brought a lot of good conversation on unintended consequences of several advocacy groups i…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 04:27 PM
5

I disagree that women get a bad shake across the board. Some do, but so do some men. Acting like they all have had such a troubling life, just for being a woman, opens you up to being manipulated by the very worst and offending the very best.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 04:16 PM
0

First, go buy yourself an ACT or SAT study book (the colleges I wanted to go to preferred ACT). Study hard for those and you can get a huge return on the time invested. What field do you think you want to go into?
/r/MensRights16/11/12 03:09 PM
1

I went to summer classes to milk the most out of my scholarship. I took Spanish and German classes, along with some others, that I would enjoy and that I thought might be useful at some point despite them not really counting towards my major.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 03:06 PM
8

She wanted a men's style haircut, I think.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 03:00 PM
1

Maybe, although it isn't unknown for people who are being abused to say things like "I fell down" when asked about their injuries.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 10:22 PM
1

My parents started pushing me to be a lawyer from birth, both because it would be useful to the family and because they thought I would have a good life.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 09:58 PM
2

If I win the lottery, I'm building a historical vault with the longest lasting medium I can devise and filling it with photoshopped pictures, altered quotes, faked evidence, and mislabeled evidence. I would put some nice official seals and other markings to indicate it was part of a vault of secret covered up information by the government. If archaeologists in the future ever found it, history would likely never be put back together correctly barring a time machine.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 02:45 PM
5

Wikipedia says Skype was started in 2003.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 10:46 PM
1

I wasn't assuming that. I just find it amusing considering the definition changes some groups make in order to fight their cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 07:51 PM
1

Aren't gender-biased legal issues examples of institutional sexism?
/r/MensRights13/11/12 04:54 PM
1

Both men and women are capable of pretty much all forms of DV (physical, emotional, etc.)
/r/MensRights13/11/12 04:22 PM
9

Being bigger and stronger is a liability when dealing with the police, even for crimes you report being committed against you.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 08:12 PM
1

Mufasa.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 07:37 PM
1

True, deserts are often cool at night due to a lack of humidity and cloud cover.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 07:18 PM
5

Out of the ones pushing for no leniency, you have a further division. Some want everyone to be punished harshly for crimes. Others want everyone to be punished harshly for crimes, in the hopes that this equalization will lead to changes to the criminal justice system for everyone. This same division is apparent in discussions about the draft. I doubt many men want to be drafted, but the best way to get it to be relegated to the dustbin would be to involve the voting majority (women) directly.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 07:13 PM
10

I don't think it will be ended until the voting majority has to sign up as well.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 12:12 AM
18

You should probably avoid that person in the future.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 05:52 PM
24

It seems rather obvious that MRAs would be a welcoming community for gay men, but it's rather ironic that it is welcoming to lesbians as well.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 07:39 PM
4

Or just eat them all yourself. It takes a lot of calories to oppress the rest of the globe.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 03:36 PM
6

I'm going to start mugging people and donating the majority of it to the Red Cross. Hopefully I won't get caught by the police, but if I do, I'm sure they will agree that my heart was in the right place.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 03:35 PM
2

It is at least as bad as asking if you know someone.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 02:27 PM
13

I have got to ask my wife, mother, and sisters when the election for the representative for all women was held. I don't remember them talking about it, but apparently Roseanne won the right to be spokesman for all women.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 06:33 PM
1

I have seen it used that way, and the wikipedia article locks in pretty well with my understanding of it. It says you may be less privileged than a woman if you are man, but only for other reasons not associated with gender.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 05:58 PM
1

It still says that a man is always advantaged over a woman, all else being equal.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 04:43 PM
2

Are those the states where you can legally get a divorce on the grounds of impotence?
/r/MensRights26/10/12 02:07 PM
2

The statistics can be manipulated pretty drastically by how you count people who have been divorced more than once.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 06:35 PM
1

I was encouraged to be a lawyer (since it would be useful to the family). Ended up an engineer, parents couldn't be happier, although they still talk about me going to law school.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 03:06 PM
9

Would that be a world where as long as you stay in line, everything is nice, pleasant, and free; when you step out of line you realize they have been monitoring you and you are going to a prison?
/r/MensRights19/10/12 02:38 PM
-3

Maybe "open to being wrong"?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 04:36 PM
-1

Do you tag by personality/argumentation or by views?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 04:24 PM
5

Collectivist views frequently have that issue. It's the natural progression of grouping people.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:42 PM
2

So, "smartass" it is.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:36 PM
0

I think SRD, but who knows. I do seem to remember some other SRS tags disparaging you with some macro they had set up. How would you like your tag to read?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 03:07 PM
-1

I have you tagged as "SRS feminists". What has changed recently?
/r/MensRights18/10/12 02:54 PM
2

I don't think he's a troll, I just think he can't spell and has a grudge against most women.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 01:38 PM
3

Expectations of "honor" went along with a reward of respect, just like most other traditional expectations there was a reward for fitting into your place. When the rewards are gone, expecting me to fill some expectation of honor is no longer a fair bargain.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 04:53 PM
14

Women were allowed to and encouraged to join the war effort in noncombat roles. Men were drafted for combat roles.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 02:19 PM
2

At least make a worthwhile protest vote. I recommend Gary Johnson.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 05:27 PM
-1

I know that for IQ it works that way, but assuming that IQ translates into wages in a similar fashion probably isn't the best assumption.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:52 PM
-2

Assuming they have the same center and the same normal distribution, cutting off at minimum wage would yield a higher average wage without really helping the average of either side, at least as far as I can tell. Those are a bunch of assumptions that could throw the whole thing off, so I wouldn't go about making any policy recommendations with them, but it is interesting.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:46 PM
0

That would be the only example I've ever seen of American exceptionalism from SJWs.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:15 PM
1

Can you expand on that?
/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:11 PM
-2

So you think the average would be higher, but there would be a significant group of men worse off than any other group?
/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:10 PM
1

I see your point, but I guess I just don't have much hope for groups like NOW to ever be that egalitarian.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 04:56 PM
1

Calling yourself an egalitarian will get you tarred with the MRA brush anyway by feminists, just so you know what to expect.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 03:51 PM
2

As long as people are consistent, I have no problem with that. However, I find those same people would be horrified if a restaurant refused to serve black people or if a private golf course refused to allow women to join as members. Then the rationalizations would start, covering up the fact that they have no strong principles other than that some groups have extra rights due to a unique history.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 03:47 PM
1

If you stay and fight and don't gain control of the reins, you are giving them legitimacy.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 03:43 PM
3

Can I have a link to the source of this clip? Also, is there some sort of link proving this is Miss Arkansas?
/r/MensRights12/10/12 09:06 PM
2

That depends on whether people would actually bother to tell the truth. If you take a few steps to be more anonymous, you can make a couple phone calls or send a few emails that would make someone's life much more difficult regardless of their past comments or beliefs.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 02:12 PM
1

That's assuming they are even interested in getting it right or only targeting what most people would consider legitimate targets. Which is a big assumption. Also, there's a difference between turning people in for investigation to the cops and trying to destroy their lives with harassment.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 01:54 AM
1

There was a deal where an SRSer got a doxx wrong and tried to frame a guy for being a pedophile.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 09:12 PM
2

When has the truth ever been a concern for SRS? Do you think they are above making up things about someone they dislike? A few phone calls, a few baseless accusations, and any one of us could have serious issues in our lives.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:38 PM
6

I find it hard to separate the two other than superficially. You go to some of the other feminist spaces on reddit and you see SRS tags and many of the same ideas with a difference as substantial as wrapping paper. However, I have found a few feminists on reddit that actually have some principles, and I usually tag them as "reasonable feminists" and upvote them even if I disagree.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 06:12 PM
5

My mother told me something a little different...
/r/MensRights02/10/12 04:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter