TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Queasy_Bit952 Archive

View 0 posts and 87 comments by Queasy_Bit952 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

My other account got banned for calling someone a fou tain of insanity but this shit is acceptable. The mods here are a fucking joke. Especially you wtk ight. Fix your fucking flair already.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 02:13 AM
1

Screw the rules mate, I'm talking about you the person only accepting the answers you want, not the answers you get, and then undermining the ones you don't want. Not even really disagreeing, but trying to frame them as invalid to your question that specificly asks about the things you dismiss. See, I'm not pointing it out to you, but to readers because, again, you used this tactic quite well.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 07:28 AM
0

Well, I'll admit this was a surprisingly competent attempt at "just asking questions". But you responded too often. Anytime someone agreed with the answer you want you literally thank them, anytime they bring up larger issues you disagree and make some comment alluding to lack of clarity. The TRP rant as some set of facts rather than an expressed ideology gave the game away. Still, a lot of guys try the "just asking questions" tactic and fail miserably. You did not.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 07:14 AM
1

This is why I come here. So many quiet parts said out loud.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 06:50 AM
1

... those are the things that make it funny. Right?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 06:49 AM
1

Let's just cut to the chase. Do you think mascalunity is bad in some way? Or that women think its bad? If so, what 'bad' things about men do you think are the fault of men? What 'bad' things about women do you think are the fault of men?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 12:25 AM
2

TLC. As I'm sure you've been made aware.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 04:23 PM
1

Just for fun, explain to me why you think 'scrub' means virgin/inexperienced.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 01:20 AM
1

We know. Also yes, that was pretty brutal.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 12:24 PM
1

No. You reply "what's on second?" Brush up on jokes you should understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 12:21 PM
–

That's what I read for my conclusion. Who's on first?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 12:11 PM
–

By reading your comment
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 12:05 PM
–

You said the quiet part out loud mate. That you (and OP) think of women as less than adults.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 12:02 PM
1

That's true. Bit of a "life finds a way" thing going. That which should be mocked will be.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 11:58 AM
2

Not bad faith, just not worth taking you seriously
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 11:56 AM
3

I'm just gonna give you the benefit of assuming you're high. Or 12.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 10:12 AM
2

Mate, that response is missing like 15 exchanges you had in your head. Didn't say anything about blue pill, or literally anything you define as a blue pill. A definition completely irrelevant to my comment. I didn't ask what's wrong with blue pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 09:54 AM
2

Does a recipe for enchiladas count as something outside evo. Psych? If not please, please, explain how.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 09:51 AM
1

Phrenology was scientific for over a century. Still, my point is not that Evo. Psych is wrong, it's that it doesn't provide every answer. There are more boxes to look inside.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 09:47 AM
14

This is why we mock you. You're so convinced that you're "scientific" you can't even conceive something that exists outside 'evolutionary psychology'.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 02:01 AM
–

Because the conversation continues past that one specific observation to why men are frustrated, and men consistently out themselves as sexist and entitled given the chance. Once that happens it's just more fun to insult them in a way that annoys them because they've proven they are not worth taking seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 08:52 PM
2

Wow. PUA definitely predated TRP. TRP was an offshoot that focused on Evo. Psychology rather than pure social effectiveness at getting laid. The traditional values stuff came even later. Also, just saying something didn't begin this way doesn't change what it has become.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:04 PM
2

Be honest, is this just a bad attempt at trolling or do you think your word salad makes sense?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 12:02 AM
–

Woe is me and equivocation at its finest. You seem at least vaguely self aware. Lean into being self aware, not whatever makes you feel better about yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 12:47 AM
1

No. Phone app got me messed up. My bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 01:05 AM
0

Or, you know, try not to fail the dumbest way possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 01:04 AM
4

This. A thousand times this.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:16 AM
1

You're trying to restrict things to what people can objectively know. A lot guys here do that, but it rarely makes sense because social interactions are not objective, they are subjective. It's not absurd to think men that say offensive shit about women anonymously online believe those things. It's also not absurd to notice that a significant majority of guys here, not 'the internet' but this sub say offensive shit, so chances are someone complaining on this sub believes those things. I see no r…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 10:16 AM
1

Just don't spring it on them at the date. There is still for many people an assumption the man will pay, so if you have been texting/whatever and only bring up splitting the bill at the date its not insane to think this dude just wants to make some petty drama as a test. Save yourself more time by mentioning it beforehand.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:12 AM
1

Even in your example you attribute intent to evolution. Gravity doesn't intend things to fall. That's just how it works. Evolution doesn't intend certain things to succeed. They are considered successes because they exist in the description of nature called evolution. Maybe that's too subtle a distinction for what you're saying. This isn't a peer reviewed thesis. But your constant implication of intent is just wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 09:07 AM
-2

This is a very poor understanding of evolution and science. Anytime you're attributing 'supposed to' or intent to science, particularly natural science you have grossly misunderstood.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 08:24 AM
2

ChatGPT is that you?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 08:17 AM
4

Agreed. Look how pissed you are she left. You just assume she was enjoying it because you're so fucking great how could she have been anything but pleased by your company. She wasn't having an enjoyable time. That's why she left.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 05:37 AM
4

I'm not gonna check that source, but this isn't exactly crazy advice or exclusive to women for the early stages of dating. Not putting all your hopes on one person the first date is normal, having options is normal. That changes as the relationship goes longer, but if you have been dating someone for some time with the understanding it wasn't serious or exclusive then you should be to point where you can have that conversation about changing the relationship ship to something more serious. Peopl…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 02:57 AM
1

Neither is demanding people care about your bruised ego.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 01:29 PM
1

Step one, stop accusing women of being sadistic for showing men the same disregard men have always shown them. Whatever you imagine the solution is, it doesn't involve pointing and saying "they're sadistic". This is the post you are calling for reasonable civility on. How about responding to OP instead of being pissy I regard him with the same respect he has for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 03:13 AM
1

Why were women less cruel in the past? Maybe because the consequences were too severe. My mentality is that everyone has the right to be an asshole if they want, not just men. Nobody should be, but even women can be. If that's too 'individualistic' then sorry mate, check your privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/24 02:05 AM
1

Scale. You are talking about women rejecting a date or even an interaction. That's what I'm talking about. I may have used overly general terms, but scale matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 11:02 PM
1

I assume that's a movie reference. Never saw it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 09:49 PM
0

Failure is normal and the world doesn't owe you its attention or care. Learn some damn resilience. See, it's not toxic masculinity but I see how you got there. Men here like to pretend they are telling the real hard truth. There it is, strangers don't give a fuck if you're offended, even women you hit on. They anticipate the same, but a man not giving a fuck about a woman he's hitting on has very clear dangerous connotations, so buck up buttercup and take the hit to your ego. If it shatters just…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 08:59 PM
–

Man up. She didn't butcher you. you're just insecure. Rarely do women make some big show if humiliating a guy for hitting on them, unless the dude won't take no for an answer. 99% of the time it's one comment. Walk it off champ.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 04:42 PM
-3

That was meaningless word salad.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 04:39 PM
0

No it's not. You just bought into the stupid strawman you yourself created as real.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 04:30 PM
1

Ohhhhhhh. You're 12. That makes more sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 03:15 AM
0

Take your shitty philosophy 101 moral equivalence elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 02:28 AM
0

To demonstrate the inherent stupidity of even thinking this crap is right.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 10:54 PM
-2

No. Because I do not believe it and am not going to give anyone free ammo they are too stupid to even figure out themselves. I played devils advocate enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 10:35 PM
1

Even granting the premise, it doesn't mean men necessarily settle. Settle only means something for that individual. So, if a 6 woman always chooses an 8 man, and never below that, and a 5 woman chooses a 7, never below, then literally the best a 7 man can do is a 5 woman. There is no settling because there is no option better. What's necessarily true in the assumption of women hypergamy is that 'equal' value is impossible. So maybe don't hold so tight to that idea of hypergamy if you are a 7 and…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 10:22 PM
1

What a surprise. Thanks for clarifying that you're definitely a dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 09:38 PM
1

Oh, okay. Misunderstood. Well that's pretty close to my point, that what people describe as masculine or feminine cannot be reasonably described as based on sexual selection because it is also so clearly based just as much on other factors, like stereotypes. Fair enough if you don't like the way I went about it. I preferenced clarity over exactness, because that conversation never seems to end.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 09:15 PM
1

I wasn't describing the stereotype as reductionist, I was describing the method as reductionist, then offered a stereotype as a clear example that doesn't fit the model.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 08:56 PM
1

I would urge you to read about the connections and importantly disconnections between emotions, thoughts, and actions. It's just so weird you talking about the price of an emotion.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 05:54 PM
3

Might be worth mentioning some impactful reasons rather than the same unimpactful one.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 05:43 PM
1

This is my point, and I choose you because you seem reasonable. You spent many comments arguing other considerations are attempts to obfuscate the transactional nature of relationships, but when it comes down to it you clearly understand the objection to describing a serious relationship as transactional.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 05:41 PM
8

Do you think there are enough of this kind of Chad to account for the disparity? Most arguments I see put the number of chads very low
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 05:30 PM
3

From my post, since it's responding to you. "As for the 'traits desirable to the opposite sex' in the vein of sexial selection, nobody thinks sneezing pitch or volume is a trait used in mate selection, but we all know when someone sneezes like a girl. Also, that idea assumes a biological foundation and fails to account for what can be significant cultural differences." This kind of thing is why evolutionary psychology isn't the only tool for every problem. It becomes needlessly and falsely reduc…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 05:20 PM
1

I think of it like Who's Line is it Anyways? The rules are made up and the points don't matter. The terms can broadly describe a set of traits common to a gender in a specific culture at a specific time. As for the 'traits desirable to the opposite sex' in the vein of sexial selection, nobody thinks sneezing pitch or volume is a trait used in mate selection, but we all know when someone sneezes like a girl. Also, that idea assumes a biological foundation and fails to account for what can be sign…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 05:11 PM
1

Transactional is still an odd way to describe that but fair enough. Assuming the answer is true. If it's not (only you know) then you already understand people's objections to the description. Never can be sure on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 04:21 PM
5

Holy fuck. I'll take two heaping scoops of whatever the fuck she's on.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 11:03 AM
7

....did I just read that? What the fuck is happening?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 10:53 AM
1

Alright, I'm invested. Does your gf know you see your relationship as transactional? As in, you have said that to her, not some bs "everyone knows even if it isn't said out loud"
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 10:50 AM
1

Explain how a broke man makes more money than a broke woman
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 10:38 AM
2

They never specified love, only you did. A relationship is not logically equivalent to love. Do you see how reductionist it is to say love is the only true basis of a relationship, therefore any relationship that has a monetary consideration is transactional. Like, if your mate passes out and you pay the tab that's now a transactional relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 10:37 AM
0

ASDA then, maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 10:11 AM
–

Well, often, yes. If someone has decided they can just unload whatever personal trauma they have on you, and you don't confront them, they'll just keep doing it. Maybe you're thinking there is a better approach, but then there was a better approach than unloading on someone not prepared to deal with your issues. If you've upset someone let's assume is close enough to you to tell all this stuff to that they feel the need to offend you to make it stop, then we are already so far from best practice…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 09:56 AM
–

You were so close. You kept the argument reasonably consistent and broadly based on biology. Then this happened. men often don’t even start to see things going up at all until they hit 30. They gain experience. Oh well. Maybe next time.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 08:21 AM
–

Honestly, I kind of respect OP going hands off here. So many galaxy brain posts have the op defending it in increasingly bizarre ways that receiving this kind of mass confusion and deciding "I'm out" is a nice change of pace.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 08:04 AM
–

I assume OP is referencing your post, where you provide a definition that includes something like "causes the listener to have an emotional shutdown" and I think they latched on to that part. Like I see the path from there to here, even if it's through some deep dark woods.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 07:56 AM
–

Alright I see the angle here. There's something to this. Still doesn't explain how trauma dumping is brutal honesty that includes the examples given.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 05:12 AM
–

Are you using 'trauma dumping' to describe saying intentionally hurtful and traumatic things to someone? That's the only way this post makes sense to me. That trauma dumping is about inflicting trauma.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 05:05 AM
1

I'm just going to let you know that if you are an adult and people are calling you champ or sport then they fucking hate you. If you are calling them one of those, they fucking hate you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 04:54 AM
0

I'm totally stealing that flat Earth thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 04:48 AM
2

Nooooooooooo! It's over. That shit must have been exhausting. I can't complete one comment in their stupid voice without breaking.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/24 04:46 AM
3

I suggest watching Dead Poets Society. Great movie, and it drives home the fact that educating someone doesn't mean giving them every answer, it means giving them the tools to be able to reason and think forthemselves. So, when someone gives you a platitude like "be youself" and you decide that means exactly what it seems and no change is required, because you are always yourself, you failed to apply your own reason. Nobody is responsible for giving you all the answers.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 08:02 AM
2

What? It's like you imagine that or any advice exists separate from all other understandings. You know people are always changing, you learned it in HS with how cringe you were in middle school. You know there is a general understanding that improving oneself, whatever form that takes, is not only good, but expected. You learned that when people stopped praising you for your terrible finger paintings. You know that if something isn't working you try a different angle. It's what you did when you …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 07:53 AM
1

Red pill dudes really don't understand what is happening here. I see you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 07:34 AM
5

Highlanders need not reply
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 07:21 AM
3

Alright man. Differences in complete sentences are the same as the difference in pronunciation of a single word. Well done. Because TRP explicitly defines itself in opposition to the norm, any shared ideas cannot be red pill because they do not fulfill that requirement. The burden of proof is on you to demonstrate how TRP is different. Any shared ideas are at best pill neutral. Especially if they existed before TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 12:48 AM
-1

... you do realize that nonsense was a textbook example of gaslighting right? " your wrong about what you think, we actually agree" They are not the same sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 12:03 AM
5

As long as I've been banging your mom.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 11:55 PM
3

I can't think of anytime someone that identified as blue or even explicitly not red has said "we were always red pill" what they say is "claiming something as red pill doesn't make it red pill. It already existed in the mainstream"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 11:41 PM
4

Autistic often results in someone being literally unable to understand things beyond a surface level. These dudes can, they just choose not to. It's a minor point, but describing them as autistic does them too much credit. They can understand things more deeply, they just refuse too. Not really worth harping on though.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 11:34 PM
5

That autistic jab really wasn't necessary, and misrepresents that most of these dudes are fully capable of understanding things themselves, but they sill expect everything to be spelled out in an acceptably "thruthful" way. The truth being women are not better than men, and are mostly worse because they lie!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 11:04 PM
2

Is there really no expectation that people be able to figure things themselves? Everything needs to be spelled out. You can't just decide yourself, without saying anything outloud if someone is misrepresenting what they want? It's just such an odd mix of "women are lying, not just finding an answer they are comfortable with, and everybody needs to know". That's the bit that just comes off as entitled. Everybody deludes themsselves to get through the day, but dammit it's totally unfair if it affe…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/24 10:53 PM
2

What you describe is technically accurate, but it fails to account for the fact that most black pillers started with TRP and then radacalized.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 09:01 PM
1

No. Literally anyone can "bring up" a real issue. If they don't offer any solutions then it is objectively not part of their beliefs. It's just bait to get you in the door.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 08:48 PM
0

FYI saying eugenics programs are the ideal pipedream is a pretty clear red flag mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/24 03:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter