TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

QueenNayru Archive

View 2 posts and 399 comments by QueenNayru on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

I think the disparity is more married men cheat, whole more girlfriends cheat. Married men are infinitely more desirable tham single/uncommitted men. They're younger, less established, have less societal value. Married men on the other hand are older, wiser, established in their career, proven to be able to provide. Married men are attractive to women, unmarried/young men are not. Or at least not nearly as much. Meanwhile women that are younger or newly married are equally attractive across the …
/r/MensRights12/09/20 02:24 AM
1

Ah seems I may have embellished a tad. 50% + https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/technology/2016/may/26/half-of-misogynistic-tweets-sent-by-women-study-finds https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/amp/technology-36380247
/r/MensRights12/09/20 02:04 AM
1

Talk about a major win for MAPs......
/r/MensRights11/09/20 04:41 AM
6

1) that's a courage thing and not really a has it better or privilege thing. In reality men are far more likely to be attacked/injured by strangers. Men just arnt as afraid/trust themselves to defend themselves more either with or without weapons. Plenty of dudes conceal carry for just such a situation, it's not unique to women. 2) everyone is self conscious, Men are just required to get over it if they want to exist as an adult. Meanwhile women receive support for being self conscious. As for p…
/r/MensRights22/08/20 12:42 AM
12

And I quite like Christina. The issue you're facing is that the "fakes" are using your name to do some fucken awful things and as such are a problem. People reacting to the problem must address the problem by the name it's adopted. Asking us to start calling the problem by a different name weakens are ability to address the problem as it causes confusion. In addition it really doesn't matter what the problem is called, we could call em blobs for all I care. But they brandish the label feminist, …
/r/MensRights20/08/20 02:53 PM
15

They took the name and made the changes. Until "not man haters" take the name back and do some good. It's feminism doing the harm.
/r/MensRights20/08/20 02:33 PM
3

"interesting, it's seems no one else got the memo"
/r/MensRights15/07/20 12:24 PM
1

Oh ok not saying that men don't face issues and that submiting to what the world demands of men is healthy. Just that men invest in themselves/don't let society dictate their lives they come out the other end unstoppable. With that in mind sure it's fucking hard.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 12:22 AM
2

I don't think you're wrong at all. Men these days are taught to be serfs but are still rewardedfor being men ironically. So while society will teach you to stand down and stay in your land, life will insist you be a leader. So yeah it's harder to grow up as a man, but if you go through life and come out the other end a man you retain insane value yaknow?
/r/MensRights07/06/20 12:04 AM
1

I'd say you describe some Incredible instances of fraud. And fraud us shitty, it's criminal and it's worthy if jail time. I'd admit even that women get away with fraud more easily. So know your rights and report the bad actors. So while yes women have more options, and yes they get away with more. They're the bitch ass younger siblings that while the rules sent as strict on them, they're worse off not having that structure
/r/MensRights07/06/20 12:00 AM
2

I try not to be a lier, thank you
/r/MensRights06/06/20 11:49 PM
0

I'd argue that men are born into and taught how to be independent while women must choose to Learn it. Sure there are less options in that you can't just choose to be able to birth children and it be so. But you can choose to be anything else and achieve it with it without a woman at your side. As long as you are envious of others you'll never be satisfied with yourself.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 04:35 PM
1

I mean at least here in the states we tried doing away with dads and fatherless families are suffering. So shit on dad's all you want, the numbers say that just leads to a suffering woman and child :/ It's just a question of how're you're a leader. Who are you leading and to where? You could be leading many family's, or just your own, or your work team. Ofcourse there will be younger men being led by these leaders until they're capable enough to break out and be leaders themselves. Being success…
/r/MensRights06/06/20 04:07 PM
1

If a women chooses to be a mother she sacrifices all the value she gained as a boss/leader/CEO. So sure there are instances where at peak performance a man is equal to a woman at peak performance. It doesn't get much more egalitarian than that. As soon as a woman chooses to be a mother she looses all work based value she earned. There may be a reputation associated with her, but she is now a mother and no longer a leader. A man that becomes a father. Not just to his family but his community. A s…
/r/MensRights06/06/20 03:48 PM
0

The difference is women replace their inate value by doing. They have to give up what makes them special to reach the heights that men reach doing. By giving up being a biological mother they can be the equal of men. Men by giving up their whimsy they Excell beyond belief. So I guess what I'm getting at is men are born with hardship and get to choose how to funnel it. Women are born with freedom and have to choose motherhood or late onset hardship to earn purpose. It is unfair because it's two d…
/r/MensRights06/06/20 03:35 PM
0

Shell out value men and women that haven't tried for sure. And if she never has a family then she'll be on par with the highest value of men.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 03:14 PM
0

I agree in that affirmative action is anti liberty. As far as higher education while I agree it's fucked and needs reform. There is the internet, and time if you're passionate and dedicated enough you can be a pioneer without it. You can still gain value without spending thousands on a useless degree. Honestly schools are so fucked I think you'd learn more and be more capable without colleges/universities and you just started trying to do what you wanted
/r/MensRights06/06/20 03:12 PM
0

Men's value comes from what you do. And as you do things your value increases, so to compare a man that's done nothing to any woman the man will be under valued every time. But as soon as you start doing anything and investing your time, energy, and even money into that something. Your value skyrockets. So a man that builds a business will out value a typical woman. But a man that's done nothing will never come close to the value of a woman. So as a man you get to choose what your responsibility…
/r/MensRights06/06/20 03:02 PM
1

What the modern world won't reach is that you're born with purpose. That purpose is to improve, to strive, to succeed, yeah it sucks, the male lot in life is to try. But there's some structure to that, you get to try at anything. It honestly doesn't matter if you try hard enough. Try so hard that you're capable of achieving what a 10 man team could manage if they work together. The direct comparison between men and women is only unfair if the men don't try. So pick your poison and whole heatedly…
/r/MensRights06/06/20 02:52 PM
1

Natural selection is about outliving/outbreeding other individuals, but this applies to all life. Yes I have to agree that Natural selection only succeeds when time is involved, but you have to convince me that biology isn't a primary player. So is tradition, so is culture, You can't have one without the group. Yes, we are mating to a size that the planet can't sustain. But not as much as we can. We are outside of our Environment of Evolutionary Adaptedness, and we are not behaving very fitly. T…
/r/MensRights12/05/20 08:12 AM
2

I'm confused. Yes we are different sexes but the same species. The sexes are two different reproductive modes within a single species. Yeah you're right, I said "Sexes", I meant "Species" It was a fuck up, you took it literally, but hey we all fuck up. There is a difference between arguments at the level of the individual and the level of a group (or population or species) Absolutely. Individuals are going to have values and beliefs that they hold. But Collectives are going to have values that a…
/r/MensRights12/05/20 07:51 AM
0

This is a misunderstanding, we are the same species. That's what I'm saying. To look at my original quote: QueenNayru: I find this point interesting but entirely reliant on the idea that men and women are different species, which is just false. I am pointing out that you make an argument that relies on the basis that Male and females are different sexes and claim that premise to be false. You agree with me that male and female humans are both humans. With this in mind, we can then conclude that …
/r/MensRights12/05/20 07:06 AM
2

It is a shame you would give up amidst an interesting conversation. I would have liked to hear your thoughts on my rebuttal. Since you won't offer rebuttal though, I guess your link will have to do (I do recognize and appreciate it is a link to your own thoughts. I don't buy that childbirth plays into it, I've never seen a convincing argument for that. I think it's the greater neoteny of women. To be clear, the definition of Neoteny is "The retention of juvenile features in the adult animal." Th…
/r/MensRights12/05/20 05:48 AM
1

I don't see what difference it makes if men vary in their value (women do too if you include infertility). To be fair I was answering the question as to "Why are women considered more valuable". I think I answered that, its because women receive their value upfront due to them bearing the responsibility of maintaining the persistence of the species. The entire point is Men rival women in value, the question isn't in level of value, its in when that amount of value is achieved. See, if you have 3…
/r/MensRights12/05/20 05:27 AM
0

Yes, and a man provides, protects, and conquers during that time. In the past, without men, a society would be a natural target for pillaging and raping/marrying/killing/enslaving. You are correct, My point is women by nature of being able to give birth have inherent value, and Men have earned value. The men capable of providing, protecting, and conquering earn their value by becoming capable of such things. Men that never/refuse to become capable of those things never earn their value. Its not …
/r/MensRights12/05/20 04:24 AM
0

Historically speaking childbirth would be the root cause of this. If a man dies, a woman can replace that man with a baby boy. If a woman dies another woman has to replace that woman with a baby girl. Couple this with the fact that replacing a person takes approx 9months of down time, then a few years of child rearing. Then it's pretty straight forward why men would be tasked with protecting and providing for the women (as they would have long periods of reduced activity) and women would take a …
/r/MensRights12/05/20 03:03 AM
1

R/iamverysmart
/r/MensRights12/05/20 02:56 AM
10

It's hard not to right. Like for as many guys stay up all night wanting to tea bag whoever killed them. it's the same folks that just absorb friends and adventure in groups.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 12:56 AM
61

I feel like kind of a bitch, but I too am tearing up at this story. As the monster of time stampeads forward I think back to the many adventures I've been on and how I may not have realized who I was to people and people who didn't realized who they were to me. This story perfectly embodies what video games are to me. I love it!
/r/MensRights08/05/20 10:56 PM
2

Solid strawman you got there. Op never said men were oppressed.
/r/MensRights07/05/20 05:45 AM
4

Tbf that sub Reddit is dedicated to the most sexist and hateful of the movement, so until the news praises them as progressive leaders, they just hateful wentches
/r/MensRights06/05/20 12:41 AM
1

I'm glad, night
/r/MensRights03/05/20 07:46 AM
1

Let me get back to you when I have time to really dive into every cover page in this slideshow . I watched the first minute and their really is a lot to comment on. Essentially these cover pages look like era-esque deep dives into what motivated me. While that may not be appropriate in today's age, and virile man back in the ages was desirable. Either way look pour some real thought into it when I have a bit more time and it's not 3 am lol
/r/MensRights03/05/20 07:35 AM
2

False accusations would fall under inaccurate statistics. But I agree they do cause their own Set of problems
/r/MensRights03/05/20 07:30 AM
2

I think that's been true for quite a while.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 07:18 AM
2

So just to throw this into terms I understand. Because according to official organizations there is no legal definition for a women raping a man (no made to penetrate definition) if a women rapes a man it can be classified as a men none consensually penetrating a women, which would constitute rape. While this will be dependent on the dispatch officers, because it could be considered sexual assault (I think. I could be wrong). Ultimately, because if the screwed up definitions if rape, recently ra…
/r/MensRights03/05/20 07:15 AM
5

I think I see what you're saying, but it's fairly limited and hard to understand. I think some elaboration and a clearer point would help people like me comment.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 06:51 AM
1

I have not watched the video as of yet but I did want to comment on the usage of the phrase "real men" In my experience when articles, magazine ads or market campaigns were just trying to capitalize on masculinity. If they could convince you that you could achieve some sort of man status by buying a product or participating in an activity they were happy. But let's actually look at the phrase "a real man". Ironically enough in my experience I always found it an inclusive label . Like there was a…
/r/MensRights03/05/20 06:49 AM
1

¯_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights02/05/20 05:56 PM
2

Anyone else feel like we're not really losing all that much here?
/r/MensRights02/05/20 05:46 PM
32

By that logic, saying "my man" or "my husband" is equally as sexist. So now that we've made everyone equally shitty can we move on? Lol
/r/MensRights29/04/20 10:43 PM
21

Huh, and I thought revenge porn was a bad thing 🤔
/r/MensRights29/04/20 08:14 PM
6

I think that the majority of circumcised men have had the choice made for them is a valid arguement.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 08:11 PM
3

I find that doubtful, while you can find women as bread winners studies show that those relationships don't tend to last. There are a plethora of women writing op-eds about how they either give up on dating because so few men earn more than them or they grow to resent their partners because they either don't earn enough or have it so great because they stay at home with the kids. To me this indicates that it's not a societal expectation that men provide but rather women's desire that a man provi…
/r/MensRights29/04/20 07:21 PM
2

Most scholars I listen to attribute this to evolution/biological imparitives. Essentially since women's biological role is to have children, they seek a partner that can provide. If you think to ancient tribes and imagine yourself as a pregnant woman, who would you want to take care of you? Would you want the dude that can only hunt rabbits or the dude that hunts bulls? Clearly one is more capable, will be better suited to protect and you'll never worry about food. The other may be able to provi…
/r/MensRights29/04/20 02:46 PM
9

No, I think it's pretty clear that she's saying: "you don't satisfy me emotionally but your money does. So if you stop making money I'll find someone else/some else's money to satisfy my emotional needs."
/r/MensRights28/04/20 03:31 AM
2

I didn't word that to well. If you divide groups enough times you wind up with a group so complex there is only a single member. This is how intersectionality results in individuality. Though you are correct at high levels intersectionality functions like a caste system.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 06:19 PM
3

Intersectionality only works as a secondary or lower priority and not as a primary priority. The end result of intersectionality is individuality, so the only utility of intersectionality is to bridge the needs of sub groups underneath an umbrella group. This sub and most MRA groups already handle intersectionality very well in that as long as it relates to men's rights then the sub-group perspective is respected. Gay, straight, trans, white, black, ECT ECT is accepted as long as it is a men's i…
/r/MensRights22/04/20 03:16 AM
1

It's all fun and games until someone hucks a hair dryer.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 12:30 AM
1

At risk of jeopardizing my own stance and give you the benefit if the doubt. I assume you're doing a piss poor job at inferring to games like dodge ball. Regardless, this is not that. There is no gamer involved here. I maintain it is in fact, a shitty response.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 12:26 AM
1

You're not going to convince me that outside of self defense throwing things at other people is proper, respectable behavior.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 12:21 AM
2

Oh yeah I love the "throw things at my face game" lol All I'm saying is we teach kids not to throw things at each other and she clearly missed that lesson
/r/MensRights09/04/20 12:07 AM
2

Nah, hitting/throwing things isn't adorable.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 12:02 AM
3

It's obnoxious how genuinely she thinks she's hilarious. Like it's not un-funny but she basically sprayed lube on this with some extra steps. Idk maybe I just don't get the delivery.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 03:00 PM
9

Is the dude proposing in this? What a shitty response.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 02:57 PM
1

That's all fine and good on paper. I'll let you know when I see it play out that way.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 01:52 AM
2

I mean, if you did into any of the gender theory that powers feminist ideals you'll quickly find that masculinity is their enemy
/r/MensRights06/04/20 01:35 AM
4

Because even the feminists that would support men's rights have told me in the past "well give men's rights attention after we solve women's issues. You have it fine you can wait" I've talked with plenty of feminists that claim equality and that they'd support men's rights then around and tell me they'd support men loosing rights if it meant it would help women. As far as I'm concerned you can't drink the feminist kool-aid and support men's rights
/r/MensRights05/04/20 10:50 PM
24

In order to be a traitor you must have been an ally in the first place. You seem to be forgetting that the MRM is a response to feminism and it's anti male stance
/r/MensRights05/04/20 06:00 PM
0

To me this is like asking "can I nurture animals while beating thing?"
/r/MensRights05/04/20 12:30 AM
1

"I understand that men have problems and they're swept under the rug". "I don't understand this sub" Clearly you don't get it then...
/r/MensRights04/04/20 03:55 AM
9

I think violence is an issue that can effect anyone. I also think anyone can be raped so sure it doesn't need to be gendered. Being able to lie a out rape, now that's a different issue and something women can do and men suffer from.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 04:41 PM
8

They're issues for both men and women. Being able to freely lie about it is a women's privilege and a male issue
/r/MensRights03/04/20 04:22 PM
1

I believe you'll find your efforts fruitless if you believe one thing and fight for another. As for legitimate issues? Violence of all types are legitimate issues. Dv, assault, sexual assault. It's all legitimate.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 04:18 PM
21

There are legitimate issues that everyone is facing all the time. Here's a question back at you. Do you think it's prudent to prioritize issues a group faces when its less frequent and receives more support when it does happen over other group with a higher frequency and less support?
/r/MensRights03/04/20 03:37 PM
33

Pardon my cynicism but I'll be a bit more enthused when they take their movement back. Until then I just see this as there people nice people out there. It's cool but doesn't really help
/r/MensRights03/04/20 01:25 PM
6

If by progressive you mean advancing through industrial and modern eras to move past tribalism. Then I'd say they've demonstrated that they can't be as progressive.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 08:04 PM
4

You're gonna have to point them out because I've yet to find them Edit: after reading a lot of the comments in this thread I'm noticing a trend here. You continue to reference these "reasonable" people that you fail to identify. Karen's immortal words come to mind and I realize that your are referring to people we are indifferent about. When MRAs refer to feminists we only care about the ones taking action and making change. Point me to a reasonable feminists that has made a change that doesn't …
/r/MensRights02/04/20 05:38 PM
2

I find that surprising considering even posting here gets you banned from r/feminism.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 05:27 PM
3

Cool, now go talk to the feminists about it and see how they react.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 05:26 PM
14

Unfortunately even after hours of audio recordings of Amber admitting to her violent abuse most vocal feminists, radical and the Twitter bedroom feminists still supported Amber. Perhaps the reasonable feminists didn't support her. But they stayed quiet which makes them no friends of ours.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 05:04 PM
12

Now don't quote me on this. But I vuagly remember in some podcast or talk show that there were/are matriarchal societies but they never developed into the modern era. They remained as third world tribalistic societies. I could be totally off base/ remembering wrong.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 04:56 PM
4

Often the response that "women have x resources to deal with this issue, can we start to give men any resources?" Is received so "women have no problem, and men have all the problem". It's primarily and issue of people hearing what they want to hear. Like by the CDC's standard there is no sexual assault definition that encompasses a women raping a man. By definition it is impossible for a women to rape a man, so when the conversation comes up and MRAs suggest that at least women have legal recou…
/r/MensRights02/04/20 04:51 PM
4

The primary push back on women's issues here is the exaggerated severity. If we ignore accuracy for the sake of demonstration for a second. Imagine the claim " 1 in 4 violent assault cases are women." An identical way of saying that is "3 in 4 violent assault cases are men". They're the same statement. Why would we focus our efforts on the minority of victims? It's this bias that gets push back. I'd prefer if we dropped the gendered focus and just address issues as a whole, but it's undeniable t…
/r/MensRights02/04/20 04:27 PM
2

This sounds like a bad infomercial that would come run on public access cable at 1 am.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 05:11 PM
3

If stop being friends with them. "Surly you don't want to be friends with a rapist so bye"
/r/MensRights01/04/20 12:33 PM
22

In a world that "hates women" an adult woman can force an underaged boy to pay her 15k. Makes me wish I'd be hated a bit more
/r/MensRights01/04/20 12:58 AM
9

Because if Men defend themselves they lose their membership to society. Edit: typo
/r/MensRights30/03/20 02:41 PM
10

No one here is saying get used to sexual assault. They're saying acknowledge that sexual assault happens to men. As for objectifying, that one I will say get over. It happens to everyone and isn't that big a deal.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 02:22 PM
14

That is substantially different from shitting on women's rights *Edit: typo
/r/MensRights30/03/20 02:13 PM
15

I agree with you to an extent but maintain that pointing out a privilege is not shitting on a right.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 02:04 PM
2

As feminists have told me there's "feminism" and "my feminism" so anyone identifying as feminist and pick and choose and add to their practice of feminism. So technically feminism is flexible enough to include those sexists :/
/r/MensRights29/03/20 12:46 AM
5

Diversity is such a garbage term. It really ought to be replaced with community. Where you learn about those in your community and they're backgrounds while celebrating what brings you together.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 05:31 PM
4

1) I wouldn't accept the feminist solution to male suicide if I were you. Feminising men is not the solution to male mental health. 2) Fighting for equity is not as compassionate a mission as you'd first expect. It requires a certain amount of control that grows exponentially the more you try to solve for.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 05:27 PM
8

Huh that's really strange to me. I'm not sure how I missed it. Gonna have to keep my eyes peeled going forward
/r/MensRights28/03/20 03:42 AM
7

Seems unlikely, but I'll take your word for it
/r/MensRights28/03/20 02:56 AM
111

I find all the man hating entertaining in the sense that most children including boys are raised by women. Perhaps all these mother's should step up their game? Lol
/r/MensRights28/03/20 02:44 AM
62

It's less of a dog whistles and more of a fucking megaphone lmao. Either way no one here supports the term so why are you asking us to stop using it?
/r/MensRights28/03/20 02:42 AM
5

In my experience women are kind of crap listeners. They have great body language so you think the conversation is going well but they haven't heard a word you said.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 11:19 PM
45

When you demonize pride, the only way to be virtuous is to be self loathing.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 11:17 PM
3

1) Yes. But that's because I don't count bedroom feminists as actual feminists. 2) I don't think my opinion matters. But people claim to be different kinds of feminists so sure why not. 3) absolutely not. Also if it's true that every feminist is operating off of a different definition of feminism then there essential is no feminism.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen26/03/20 01:25 PM
3

Touche' You make good points
/r/MensRights25/03/20 08:09 PM
7

Isn't that like, an exactly headline regarding the stimulus debacle going on right now lol
/r/MensRights25/03/20 05:20 PM
27

Why can't an issue just be an issue. Like they think they win a prize or something
/r/MensRights25/03/20 03:19 PM
4

Seems entirely plausible. Don't know why a virologist is giving economy advice though lol
/r/MensRights25/03/20 02:02 PM
9

But remember, it's not about hating men ><
/r/MensRights25/03/20 03:06 AM
1

Sure
/r/MensRights23/03/20 11:57 PM
1

Hey, programming might come easy to you then.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 11:41 PM
5

Language is tricky and since we like to overload our words it's easy to do things like this. I only really started catch on once I learned about overloading functions in programming. Basically it's using the same function name to point to two different sets of logic. this causes irratic behavior in your program because the computer just picks a set of logic at random. Same thing is happening with words right now except the selection of a words definition is less random and more "which supports m…
/r/MensRights23/03/20 05:43 PM
5

I see what you're getting at but I disagree. Think back to the adage "too much of anything is a bad thing" Swinging to hard in any direction leads to narrow minded destructive views..
/r/MensRights23/03/20 02:45 PM
50

This is an old slight of hand trick that got women to be believed at face value. In investigations people, including the victim are questions. The goal being to get the full story. Now typically if you question someone you doubt them and if you don't question someone you believe them. So they're taking typical social interaction and replacing investigation with it. So now if a investigator questions anyone in a crime scene they doubt the witnesses. With this in place it is now doubting women who…
/r/MensRights23/03/20 02:04 PM
7

"sucks to suck, now out some pants on and earn my respect if you want it so bad"
/r/MensRights22/03/20 01:37 AM
6

I don't see this happening. Radical feminism is the logical conclusion to modern feminist theory. Because of its obsession with power and who has it, supporting men can only happen once they have nothing left. Even then this is an unlikely conclusion because of historic gender roles. The entire world and all its structures are a problem and must go. I think we'll far sooner see the death of feminism than seeing them work with MRAs. Now when I say this I ofcourse mean the feminists with influence…
/r/MensRights21/03/20 11:28 PM
2

Yeah totally fair
/r/MensRights20/03/20 02:43 PM
2

I think I'm easily won over by the anti side of things because I typically don't find great reason is chopping of any part of a person lol. I think it's fair to say the current arguements are a bit uni-dimensional, and don't stack up in comparison. Though I'll admit when the pictures of just like dick cutting factories crop up I get sympathetic lol
/r/MensRights20/03/20 02:38 PM
1

Lolol I mean I get not supporting circumcision. I don't have a fully formed consistent stance on it to be fair. Some folks do get a bit rabid about it though.
/r/MensRights20/03/20 02:30 PM
1

Haha ditto. I don't think you're being unreasonable
/r/MensRights20/03/20 02:15 PM
2

Yeah I get that. Thanks for filling me in :)
/r/MensRights20/03/20 02:10 PM
3

No judgment but which ones don't you care about (legit just curious)
/r/MensRights20/03/20 02:01 PM
1

Ah, thank you for the clarification!
/r/MensRights20/03/20 12:32 PM
2

Everything has a thin line between positive or negative. leadership: Leadership needs some kind of dominance and control over the group. Let's just hold onto that for a second. I'll agree with you that men are expected to learn their defining traits from a young age. I'll posit that you'll notice that young boys will exhibit these traits with minimal to now expectation as well. For example this 5 year saving his sister and dog from a fire. Now, of course, this isn't universal but you see the gen…
/r/MensRights20/03/20 12:20 AM
2

I just listed off some masculine traits that came to mind. Please note my final comment "I may be way off base here".
/r/MensRights19/03/20 06:28 PM
1

It's hard to succinctly list a handful of things because most things women can do to. But I think that's the thing, it's something women do, while it's who men are. Ex: self reliance, initiative, leadership, inspiration, mentorship, group/pact loyalty. I would say these are all prime examples of positive masculinity. The issue being women can exhibit all of these traits. But women have to choose to embody these traits. While men simply striving to be better men will find this traits within thems…
/r/MensRights19/03/20 05:05 PM
24

Lol it's not even that, they go on in the article about how now that all the men are getting sick and shit they're left to take care of their kids. Like all "oh woe is me, I have to stay home and take care of my kids. This is far worse than what my husband has to deal with. He's only as risk of death from a pandemic the lucky bastard" (paraphrasing) Like some how death is an inconvenience at best lol
/r/MensRights19/03/20 03:37 PM
2

Devil's advocate is a term used to describe the act of advocating for the opposite position of who you're in a discussion with even if you don't believe it. It's a way of testing the integrity of an idea. Ex: "feminism supports men too" "Ok, how does it achieve that?" "By dismantling the patriarchy" "Assuming feminism is achieving that. How does dismantling a system designed to benifit men, actually benifit men" Etc.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 03:11 PM
2

You only find them if you ask questions and play devil's advocate. The people I talked to, at face value would agree. They want to help everyone. And as soon as you start asking how, and when, etc. That's when you start to see the conditionality of it all come out.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 02:57 PM
2

You are correct. I was a bit vague, I think this will add another dimension to the existing discussion
/r/MensRights19/03/20 02:48 PM
6

As they say, knowledge is power. Yeah it's these reasons feminism gets called an ideology or even a cult. It's values are extremely conditional. It's tenants are applied through the condition "does this benifit women"
/r/MensRights19/03/20 02:47 PM
3

This is where one of my favorite terms comes into play "zero sum game" It's the idea where effort/attention/support is finite so as you attempt to support anything other than women, then that's less support for women, so it's actively hurting women to support anything other than women (and on the flip side actively supporting women takes away from everything else lol)
/r/MensRights19/03/20 02:21 PM
4

Oh the crazy part is they started out saying they support men's rights. Just not right now, after women's issues get sorted then we can give our attention to men's issues. They still like their idea of feminism is good for men lol
/r/MensRights19/03/20 02:09 PM
5

Yeah I was blown away. We were talking in the abstract so no specific laws or privileges were mentioned. But they still said clear as day that taking away from men to benifit women was something they supported. Like imagine a man advocating for women to lose rights to benifit men. Cities would burn lol.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 02:03 PM
79

Being forced to care for your family/kids truely is the most evil thing that could be done to a person /s
/r/MensRights19/03/20 01:33 PM
3

I don't this it will have the prolific liberating affect people might assume. I think it will create some discussions around the meaning of life and that's about it.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 12:31 PM
9

From personal experience I've had a few feminists (none radical, you wouldn't know they were feminists unless you asked types). Admit to me that if it helped women they would in fact removing rights from men.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 12:27 PM
5

Oh its been that way for a few years now. Ever since the "ex" cam girls took over it became overrun with leftist policies
/r/MensRights19/03/20 03:14 AM
9

It used to just mean having the father as the head of the household. It's since been expanding to include all sorts of vauge nonsense.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 02:07 PM
3

Rather than chastising women on mother's day, we should celebrate the good mothers out there
/r/MensRights18/03/20 12:13 PM
4

Did this actually get pushed through and passed? I know original it was like some kinda protest about the abortion laws they passed
/r/MensRights17/03/20 10:41 PM
21

This plays right into the idea that men gain their value from the utility they can provide. An incapacitated man can not provide utility so their value drops to 0 until they recover. It's fucked up
/r/MensRights17/03/20 09:27 PM
8

"just doing something nice" is far different from simping. Being a simp is to be a devote of a deity that is indifferent towards you at best. At worst exploitive of your devotion. It's not just one nice thing being done, it's waiting of them hand and foot. It's not just treating women right it's spoiling one woman endlessly until you're used up and discarded. Imo there is nothing to be gained from simping.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 08:26 PM
97

It's not about how easy men have it. It's about recognizing the good that they contribute. It's not a pissing contest.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 10:08 PM
6

I can agree with that last sentiment. Tbh I'm not on Twitter so I've got no gauge for this sort of thing
/r/MensRights16/03/20 02:16 PM
12

Say it is a joke, what is appropriate response? "Lol right, men are so terribly violent and dangerous hahaha"?
/r/MensRights16/03/20 02:04 PM
26

But remember, it's not about hating/fearing men
/r/MensRights16/03/20 02:03 PM
6

Not all people. Men. Men are burdens until they are useful tools. Unuseful women are still not burdens. That said, Men would love to have some inherent value so they aren't just ignored until they can provide any amount of utility. So I guess, Sucks that you hate the handicap, but it isn't a detriment to women.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 12:32 AM
9

That is a short-sited response though. It's not that your value exclusively comes from being a woman. Its that you start with a level of value that you can increase (or even decrease) over time and with effort. Like men, you can work and earn additional value. Men on the flip side start with 0 value, and have to earn all their value through work, and being useful to those around them. Which is why very few appreciate Young men while appreciating the hell out of Young women. While at the same tim…
/r/MensRights16/03/20 12:21 AM
7

But is it true?
/r/MensRights16/03/20 12:05 AM
6

I didn't say better, I said good. Better is a subjective term that ultimately is improvable. But women have a lot of aspects of their lives that are good. From being the decision-makers in relationships. To being the decision-makers in the household. Women actually command a large amount of influence. But the primary way I think women have it good is they benefit from inherited value. Women typically garner their value upfront. They have it the moment they are born. Men, on the other hand, have …
/r/MensRights16/03/20 12:01 AM
14

Women generally speaking are fine. If I'm being honest I suspect most women don't realize how good they have it. Radical feminism on the other hand is far more ignorant than it could ever understand
/r/MensRights15/03/20 10:46 PM
1

But see you're not a deviation from the path way. You're exactly where you need to be for the ones wishing to do harm need you to be.
/r/MensRights14/03/20 11:07 PM
10

If working is such a burden then why do they want to be in the work force so bad?
/r/MensRights14/03/20 04:37 PM
6

In my eyes the only feminists worth considering are the ones driving political policy and cultural beliefs. So to me you are a pebble on the cobblestone road that the horsedrawn carriage that pulls feminism forward.
/r/MensRights14/03/20 02:17 PM
5

So laws must defy an economic motive?
/r/MensRights13/03/20 01:16 PM
11

I mean, in the context of legal advocacy what is the difference between a right and a legal option?
/r/MensRights13/03/20 01:02 PM
76

Oh yeah, that place is basically a group of men trying to tell other men how to be better women
/r/MensRights12/03/20 10:25 PM
2

Oh good point lol
/r/MensRights12/03/20 01:30 AM
3

Well dammit. There goes my favorite candy
/r/MensRights11/03/20 11:34 PM
9

Just tell him it's a private medical matter and if he pressed tell him it's a surgery. Anything passed is typically illegal (check your states laws on work leave) but yeah, typically workplaces cannot require intimate medical details to give time off
/r/MensRights11/03/20 08:40 PM
0

They may very well be. There's plenty of crap male leaders. My only point was every leader coming into an existing group has to prove themselves regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 03:06 PM
4

We don't support random people in positions of power. We support leaders, and sure often leaders are in positions of authority/power. The are often thrust into those positions because it benifiets the followers to make the leader as capable as possible. The opposite of this would be nepotism, or a tyrant being pushed into a leadership position. These random people is positions of authority/power often destroy the structures that support their position by abusing their followers and the followers…
/r/MensRights11/03/20 02:30 PM
4

Blanket revenge is not only ineffective but also something a feminist would suggest/do. I would not adopt this strategy
/r/MensRights10/03/20 11:01 PM
87

Who the fuck calls it "sleezeball" life and is proud of it? Sounds like a troll to me. But yes if this is real it ain't helping
/r/MensRights10/03/20 05:06 AM
12

I personally don't think there's a place for feminism anymore, old or new. That said I'm in favor of equal opportunity for everyone.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 01:39 AM
2

False, we do not need an extremist group.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 07:57 PM
1

Not over all women, just the ones that talk to much :p /s
/r/MensRights09/03/20 04:35 AM
5

I'm quite partial to the og mgtow mindset of investing in yourself above all else. When you find yourself fatigued from the fight step back and turn inward. Buy that thing you've been eyeing. Start learning that hobby you've been considering. Take that road trip you've been dreaming of. Come back fulfilled and refreshed
/r/MensRights09/03/20 04:01 AM
4

Tbf they aren't the feminists I'm concerned with. More everyday people that took a class once in college types. The interesting be part is they start of preaching equality and as you did into the details, and how to achieve equality and where the movements focus is etc etc They eventually devolved into admitting, that yes the would support the removal of men's rights. Blew need away every time lol
/r/MensRights09/03/20 03:29 AM
16

Take a deep breath, Take a step back, and focus on yourself for a while. Gender politics can drive even the most steel willed mad. Harbouring resentment and giving into a desire for revenge will only bring you more pain.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 03:10 AM
3

And to be fair, I don't think that's representative of everyone.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 02:30 AM
10

Idk, every feminist I've talked to eventually admits that they'd be fine with Men losing rights if it meant the advancement of women...
/r/MensRights09/03/20 02:19 AM
1

Please point me towards my anti iwd post if you really think I'm one of those hypocrites :)
/r/MensRights08/03/20 06:22 PM
3

Please accept this honest critique. You're ideas are all over the place and flow between eachother. You would have a more coherent post if you picked one topic and stuck to it. "Some countries are biased against women" alright cool talk about those countries and what changes should be made "Western countries are equal" cool let's talk about what Western cultures do right. "A women's ability to give birth encourages societies to protect women for the sake of the society" sure, this even plays int…
/r/MensRights08/03/20 05:45 PM
0

Yeah some people are hypocrites.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 04:37 PM
8

As if that baby boy choose to be there. Like through force of will alone that man just spontaneously existed inside that womb...
/r/MensRights08/03/20 09:13 AM
43

Ah yes men's day. The day where women everywhere bitch about men having it to good...
/r/MensRights08/03/20 05:24 AM
1

I mean men aren’t animals. And because of that, all rapists chose to be rapists. You can’t force someone to rape just because they saw too much skin. And anyone that chooses to be a rapist should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Neither argument is saying otherwise.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 05:23 PM
3

simple. NO is what you say before not after undesired sex. I thought my post was clear on my lack of sympathy for saying "no" after the fact. No, Is what you say before, not, after, undesired, sex. Assuming someone understands all those nots. We agree, No comes before consensual intercourse. What happens if the women is drunk, say's yes before intercourse. Then says not 24 hours later after a consensual ​ Secondly, just because a persons a little drunk doesn't mean they can't say yes-or no So a …
/r/MensRights06/03/20 07:07 AM
3

Tbf that's 40ish comments you're criticising me for not reading. I admit it! I only real a few out of 30+ total messages! So if the answer to my comments lie in the thread let me know. Otherwise let's talk... *Edit I simply inquiry how op cares about men without prioritizing women :)
/r/MensRights06/03/20 06:51 AM
3

I was about to quote by quote respond to this, but seems like the rest of the sub gots this. So let me just add my personal message of congrats. You entered a men's sub with a feminist lens and immediately got the male lense. Hopefully, this encourages you, and not discourages you. And finally, hopefully, you realize that we and most all society cares about women. Next time bring a caring about men attitude and folks that will support men in your deep dive crawl!
/r/MensRights06/03/20 06:32 AM
2

doesn't matter what she wears or does or how much money you've spent - if you force sex on her and she's saying no, you're a rapist. Yes, Ultimately the criminal is a criminal. But how did the individual become a criminal and how did the victim become a victim. The entire point of the article was to exam how does this type of victim becomes a victim and what encourages an aggressor of this type of crime to become an aggressor. ​ But women do need to say NO. So if a women say's NO 2 days after th…
/r/MensRights06/03/20 06:23 AM
2

Elam has been saying extreme shit to provoke for a long time now. Especially on a voice for men. That's why I wouldn't repeat the way he makes points but would reign the point in and talk about the issue. Take the type of woman he's describing. Like a perfect THOT. A woman that dresses to maximize her sexual appeal, then utilizes that appeal for free drinks. Someone with low standards and willing to get what she wants. Spends a night out getting inebriated to the point of having no self control …
/r/MensRights06/03/20 03:29 AM
2

Kind of. I disagree with the severity of the wording / the implied levels of responsibility thrown at certain groups of women. "They're begging to be raped" it's to much of a sweating statement for me to get in board with. Some women probably are (some people get off on that sort of thing) Some women make every decision possible to put themselves in that situation wile thinking "it could never happen to me". Just as bad imo. I think Elam is speaking in such severity to make it palatable to talk …
/r/MensRights06/03/20 03:14 AM
6

I think as per usual Elam makes his point in the most unpalatable way possible. It comes with the territory of being a provacator. Generally speaking I do think women in general could do with a higher expectation of personal responsibility. A healthier understanding that they are adults with agency and their actions do have a direct impact in situations they arrive in. Ofcourse we should not condone violence committed against anyone. But at the same time an honest look at the choices both partie…
/r/MensRights06/03/20 02:23 AM
1

Idk sounds like victim blaming to me "Why didn't you tell us you didn't like getting the heel of her shoe pierced through you skull? We'd of helped you had you just said something." Like fuck off.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 09:56 PM
17

Those damn incels and their shuffles cards being alienated from their children smh How the fuck did they have kids if their incels?
/r/MensRights02/03/20 09:27 PM
2

I love the phrase "the force is female" cuz it leads to such amazing follow-ups as "no wonder no one understands it" or "ah so that's why all the good powers go to the darks side" :P
/r/MensRights02/03/20 01:28 AM
-2

1) they hate men that dehumanize women. And you refer to them as not human..suddenly their target is real making them chasing something that isn't fictional like Bigfoot. 2) they're not (not human) yet you schoosr to call them creatures and not humans. Color me not convinced. 3) calling any group anything other than human is fucked up. 4) absolutely, almost everything to ppf's do is provoking. Loosing your composure and stopping to their levels of Intolerance is what makes you skin 5) if you can…
/r/MensRights29/02/20 06:54 AM
-5

If they are human why call them creatures? You are more disgusting in that you were refer to your fellow human as 'creature' Ultimately those disgusting humans are calling for the culling of humans, while you are denagrating humans to the state of creature. You proved them sane by being the sort of human that would dehumanize others. Making their primary arguement of men seeing women as 'lesser' as valid. If you were not the vile that they call out against like the rest of us their point out be …
/r/MensRights29/02/20 06:32 AM
4

Men should do it but then exclude all women :p
/r/MensRights29/02/20 06:11 AM
-14

1) "because their views are disgusting there is a chance their inhuman" So you're hoping their inhuman by implying they could be inhuman. You're officially more disgusting than any pinkpillfeminist I've read. They may hate us and want us dead, but we're still humans to them. You seem to want to stoop lower and are proud of it. Fuck you for proven them sane. 2) "I get it don't be Hitler" Bro at least Hitler realize he was killing humans. "My point wasn't to dehumanize these people, it's just that…
/r/MensRights29/02/20 06:09 AM
-21

1) fucking sure. 2) no it's not. A fish is a creature, a cow is a creature. Humans are humans no matter how disgusting their ideas or their advocacy. 3) they may think of us as creatures, as cows/fish/food/less than food. But doing the same to them makes us no better and them equally as right as us 4) they need to realize their wrong. And that will never happen with us referring to or treating them as less than human. If you are willing to dehumanizing the worst of female advocates, then you are…
/r/MensRights29/02/20 05:49 AM
5

She probably will, considering her complaint is that men have those cushy labour/hour intensive jobs that are back breaking and time consuming. But God dammit women have to think. Those poor broads.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 05:34 AM
-21

Dude I get you're highlighting a comment from the thread that, I POSTED EARLIER. Which I wouldn't give a shit about, but calling these disgusting humans "creatures" is unacceptable. You're as disgusting as the commenters and the op of the post you're criticising. Like bro, sinking to their level proves yours no better than them, and no pinkpill feminist is an MRA and neither are you!
/r/MensRights29/02/20 05:29 AM
4

It's their ideas and arguments that are disgusting. If we refuse to acknowledge their humanity were just as bad as they are. Hate them sure, hate their ideas sure, but they are people at the end of the day.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 04:21 AM
9

In the same vein of thought. "Those factory/railroad" jobs start as crazy hard labour that after years and years of long hours are body destroying and not at all a "luxery"
/r/MensRights29/02/20 04:19 AM
0

While their views are disgusting they are still people. Disgusting people with disgusting points. But people. We can't stoop to their level and dehumanize them
/r/MensRights29/02/20 04:17 AM
1

Well sense men can pee in bushes they don't need restrooms right? Smh This shit is getting fucking stupid
/r/MensRights29/02/20 02:39 AM
3

My first though was "what fucking million/billionaire rides the fucken subway? Dude would sooner have a private helicopter take him around New York than take the subway" Edit: Grammer
/r/FeminismStopsWhen29/02/20 02:30 AM
180

MenHaveItSoGood Smh
/r/MensRights29/02/20 12:39 AM
3

Interesting how you can make this exact same arguement for men. So why complicate it with gender and just say that this is violence and bad.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 08:03 PM
2

Not saying that doesn't suck. But unless you think coming ground means getting everyone to show sympathy for you, I'd disagree about your methods
/r/MensRights28/02/20 08:01 PM
3

This sounds like a hastily construed attempt to classify violence towards women as sever and violence towards me. As not sever. Honestly with these definitions if common violence is successful in manipulating a partner it instantly becomes domestic violence. But I would like to disagree. It is quite easy and help to claim "all violence is bad". I will stand firm and say that any strike outside of self defense is wrong and be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 07:45 PM
3

You say you're looking for common ground yet every message you write is incredible defensive points the finger at anyone and everyone you talk to. Mean comments suck sure, but you loose composure at even the breath of a counter point. It's almost like your aiming to get people to argue with you.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 07:25 PM
3

1) can you prove any of your claims or do you just know it? 2) what is the difference between common violence and domestic violence? 3) are you saying that as long as no damage was done then violence is acceptable?
/r/MensRights28/02/20 05:33 PM
10

It was my experience when I visited the sub 🤷
/r/MensRights28/02/20 01:34 PM
10

There were some spiteful shits in MGTOW for sure. But for the most part it was just posting about what you can make of yourself by focusing on bettering yourself.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 01:06 PM
3

So it's perfectly acceptable to ignore male victims of DV?
/r/MensRights28/02/20 12:59 PM
2

If by equal to women you mean that Men become a class of citizenry that all of society is willing to sacrifice themselves for, then no. I don't think men will ever take that role. From a utilitarian stand point that is just not valuable to the maintanence/growth of a society. From a biological stance, men tend to find satisfaction from supporting others, so the ones sacrificing will mostly be men From a child bearing stance, men are the least debilitated during pregnancy so they'll be called upo…
/r/MensRights28/02/20 02:42 AM
2

Lol fair point. Loathe or despise, might better get at what I meant. Be satisfied with yet lose respect for.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 02:21 AM
5

Oof good luck to that dude. If he takes all that advice seriously his wife will grow to hate him
/r/MensRights28/02/20 02:11 AM
20

Lol yes IM joking. The article ain't though
/r/MensRights28/02/20 01:40 AM
2

I love the bouncing back and forth lmao. "I use this exclusively medically and it has nothing to do with getting pregnant" "YOU FUCKING IDIOT OFCOURSE I USE IT TO NIT GET PREGNANT!" "no girl will wanna fuck you if you think like this" "WOMEN DIE BY HAVING SEX YOU IDIOT!" just like damn gurl calm down, you doing all the work here lmao
/r/MensRights28/02/20 01:02 AM
3

I find the implication that the dude just woke up in that life and just coasted along through. Like it was because he was a man, then went out of it's way to show the boat boy that was the dudes total bitch. Like why isn't this second dude crushing it just as hard? Lol
/r/MensRights27/02/20 11:09 PM
16

Lol feminism isn't coherent or unified at all. It's popular. At the very root, it spreads easily because "supporting women" is an agreeable action. People see you supporting women and they want to support you in your efforts. Supporting men is not. typically people don't because it used to be a sign of respect to allow a man to support himself. That in random with the idea of minimalization, it is seen as at outward attack on women to support men.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 09:55 PM
6

Welp that's the death of this website
/r/MensRights27/02/20 07:38 PM
20

Because not giving women's issues 100% of your time, energy, and attention is anti-women to the same scale and severity in which Hitler was anti-jew smh
/r/MensRights27/02/20 05:54 PM
113

Oh God, a 5 y/o hugging another 5y/o!? Decline of society right there smh
/r/MensRights27/02/20 04:20 PM
13

I'm not saying men can't be abused by women but I can't help it - it upsets me quite seriously that so many guys are so callously minimizing the live-or-die seriousness of this issue for women! To start off, I don't care for the argument of minimalizing issues. primarily because it ultimately devolves to the premise "If we give this issue anything less than 100% focus then the issue is being minimized". Suspending that grievance for a second let's look at the recursive nature of this statement. …
/r/MensRights27/02/20 02:47 AM
1

This sounds outside of cancel culture to me. All I Can do it's express my disdane for that bullshit. At the same time, getting hit in a fight doesn't validate cancel culture. Ultimately it's up to you to become as Shameful as your opponent, or remain honorable in your conflict.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 03:21 AM
1

Be more basic boo ;)
/r/MensRights24/02/20 03:05 AM
5

I understand you're sentiment. It's tempting to fight fire with fire but at the same time. If you're not apart of the solution you're apart of the problem. If we agree that cancel culture is bad, then we should work together to be better than that.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 03:04 AM
7

And why don't you agree today?
/r/MensRights24/02/20 02:54 AM
1

I know I have a comment, but let me simplify my nuance. Cancel culture is bad, it doesn't matter who instigates!
/r/MensRights24/02/20 02:18 AM
1

Oh you're right I should just shut up, listen, and believe :) Not reminiscent of jack shit :P
/r/MensRights24/02/20 02:02 AM
1

he points out your typos, grammar mistakes and misspellings in just about about everyone of your replies My typo's AND my misspellings!? well shit, I musta misspelled my typos and made a pure ass of myself. and omg just about about every-one of my replys and not everyone that replied!? My deary I'm shocked, ashamed, and surely hogwashed in embarrassment!
/r/MensRights24/02/20 01:54 AM
1

If this were true it would explain why the dark side gets all the good powers lol
/r/FeminismStopsWhen23/02/20 07:16 PM
0

Because I moved on to make a point.
/r/MensRights22/02/20 11:58 PM
-1

Lemme know when you're butt hurt subsides and you get to any of my actual points.
/r/MensRights22/02/20 09:03 PM
-4

Ah ya got me, My entire point has been defeated! nooooooooooo, How ever will I survive with the shame of spelling loreal wrong TT.TT
/r/MensRights22/02/20 07:52 PM
-3

I'll accept that I am basic on the grounds that, through demonstration, The amount of typo's in your response subjects you to being basic as well. With that out of the way lets have a look-see. Men’s legal and health rights cannot get any traction in the media I agree in the sense that current media reporters would rather die in a coffin with a ring of garlic around their neck and a wooden stake through the heart. I would retort that such language infers certain objectivity of "not now, not ever…
/r/MensRights22/02/20 07:31 PM
1

Imo gay rights are gay rights and men's rights are men's rights. Should mens sexuality determine their set of rights? Hell no. But their are certain battles that are going to be exclusive to homosexuals. I think that MRAs will be inclined to support those battles how we can't. But I also think you should be telling us why supporting will be for lack of better words " worth it" Like don't tell us that our rights hinge on gay rights and vice versa. Tell us what's exclusive to gay folks and how men…
/r/MensRights22/02/20 06:22 PM
-3

Call me basic but how does petitioning a corporation defend my legal rights? I fundamentally don't understand Edit: Typo's
/r/MensRights22/02/20 05:49 PM
7

It's already been shown that fatherlessness increases violence in young men. So by being some of the few that advocates for Father's rights, being against the deluth model. And opposing the destruction of the family. We're doing more to combat this family than those protesting/demonstrating.
/r/MensRights22/02/20 12:40 PM
4

I find it interesting that the accusation of dog whistles caught on so strongly. "Trust me it's a secret code that only sexists can understand. I'm telling you it's true" <- wouldn't that mean that they're a sexist that can understand the code? Lol
/r/MensRights21/02/20 08:31 PM
2

Informative. Thanks for the data dump. I think we agree.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 06:09 PM
2

Unless the state continues to pass the buck to 'fathers'. Even if it doesn't it'll sky rocket taxes
/r/MensRights21/02/20 05:21 PM
7

Child support exists due to the lack of a family. I'd predict abolishing the family outright would send child support into overdrive
/r/MensRights21/02/20 05:09 PM
2

I woulda gone with the simple "lady's first" and watched her head explode
/r/MensRights21/02/20 12:22 PM
2

I'm not disagreeing that universities are biased against men. But when your reaction is to burn it all down you're just as dangerous as the universities.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 01:10 AM
1

Might as well burn books we don't like too
/r/MensRights21/02/20 01:07 AM
1

Ah yes, abolish higher education, gold ole destruction of knowledge and ideas. Cuz that's never gone wrong. Fucken hell.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 12:31 AM
3

When OP is unfamiliar with the use of /s lol
/r/MensRights21/02/20 12:03 AM
1

What the heck does "it may never happen" mean in this context. I'm so confused.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 10:25 PM
35

This is a really good example of the idea that female value is inherited, while male value is earned.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 10:14 PM
5

By your own logic. Women have women logic and due to their limited environments can't actually grasp the world at large, or use logic that appropriately applies to the world at large making their input subpar. Idk man you sound kinda sexist for putting women Down like that /s
/r/MensRights20/02/20 08:54 PM
308

"Rape culture is a society that celebrates rape!" "Men love sex so even young boys should be happy when a women chooses to fuck em" I mean. Sounds like a celebration that young boys are being raped....
/r/MensRights20/02/20 05:30 PM
5

Meanwhile on a completely unrelated note, taxi driver auto insurance skyrockets due to an increase in taxi rated auto accidents /s :P
/r/MensRights20/02/20 05:28 PM
1

We'll see, by having a form you assume a women would even have sex with you which is like 4 counts of rape right there /s Smh
/r/MensRights20/02/20 02:58 AM
5

Just gonna share this image for the next time a feminist shows up and starts trying to tell us we're actually feminists because feminists are for equality
/r/MensRights20/02/20 02:56 AM
1

"I'm already X might as well do things X would do"
/r/MensRights19/02/20 06:33 PM
1

Um, no.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 08:25 PM
5

"they proceeded to condenscend me" (now my autocorrect is gonna fuck up that word forever) Like gurl, it's more likely that you just fundamentally don't understand how disagreeing works perhaps?
/r/MensRights18/02/20 06:57 PM
-1

Good for you I guess?
/r/MensRights18/02/20 04:02 PM
4

What blows me away is all the bedroom feminists think we're after them or something. No we don't give a shit what the initiates of feminism calls themselves. We care about the real change the leaders are making and how they're hurting men.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 01:25 PM
1

Jeasus Christ no kidding. It's almost entirely fluff
/r/MensRights18/02/20 01:03 PM
13

We're not blaming conspiracy. We're looking at what influencial feminists advocate for and critically assessing it's merits. Feminism started with a lot of good points, and then it achieved a lot of it's goals, came up with some more points achieved more goals and now i find very few feminist points I agree with.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 12:48 PM
3

Here's a fun thought. It mentions "biological" children. Does this mean they were mandate dna tests at birth. If so this would inadvertently crack down on mother's lieing about whose the father lol
/r/MensRights17/02/20 02:48 AM
7

Who are these "many feminists" and what have they done for men recently?
/r/MensRights17/02/20 02:39 AM
4

Cool story
/r/MensRights16/02/20 09:42 PM
7

Never said feminism was perfect. Just that it's anti men's right. And sure there are some people that identify with feminism seem to care about men's rights but that's where their journey ends, at adopting the name. We're more concerned with the feminists that are making political change. And those making change that specifically hurt men. It's more common than I think you realize. In our estimation it's the folks that adopt the title of feminist and nothing more that are the false feminists. Ev…
/r/MensRights16/02/20 04:51 PM
7

If feminists want to work with men's rights then it's up to them to take back their movement and redirect that ship. That's not our responsibility.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 04:35 PM
14

Holy shit, that second dude was damn near ready to commit murder
/r/MensRights16/02/20 03:31 PM
6

Its amazing how it just covers everything lol
/r/MensRights16/02/20 03:20 PM
14

It's not that mensrights is anti feminist. It's that feminism is anti mensrights. There's a difference. I understand that you think otherwise, and I'm willing to attribute this to ignorance. I'd recommend you look into what the politically influencial feminists and what they call for/support and ask yourself. Does this effect men? And if so, how does this effect men?
/r/MensRights16/02/20 03:19 PM
11

Lol that's what I was just thinking
/r/MensRights16/02/20 03:16 PM
18

"Our news station could not find any specific examples for woman's only salons except for this specific example of a woman's only salon" Its in the same sentence lol
/r/MensRights16/02/20 03:05 PM
5

Maybe men just don't give a shit a out that sorta thing and women do.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 03:26 AM
1

Honestly, sounds like some shit my ex would say
/r/FeminismStopsWhen16/02/20 02:32 AM
4

I'm quite partial to boys club myself. Like there's an actual club house somewhere with a sign up "boys club, no men here, just boys, having fun, no girls, or cooties allowed" lolol Tangent aside, thanks for what you're doing for men :)
/r/MensRights15/02/20 04:07 PM
4

I do find it entertaining that the worst man haters hell bent on dehumanizing men often can't make any logical statements and rely on jargon to sound smart.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 01:41 PM
3

I wouldn't argue with this. I'd just say "fear my super mutant strength" and walk away lol
/r/MensRights14/02/20 08:32 PM
12

But remember, all women are terrified of even the thought of a man trying to hurt a woman.. Edit: typos
/r/MensRights14/02/20 05:13 PM
3

Welp fuck Alabama forever
/r/MensRights14/02/20 10:01 AM
5

I find the phrasing "man paying for a date" Like you pay for 1 date and you're good for life with a girl.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 04:17 PM
9

I don't think is so much that women don't realize their in-group bias. I think they're perfectly aware of it and presume that since they have a bias so must men. Think of all their complaints of boys clubs and male spaces, can't have that, they must be up to something. Also the creation of "my truth" it's a clever way to disassociate with ideas while still blindly supporting in-group members. Edit: typos
/r/MensRights13/02/20 12:48 PM
3

I saw it, I maintain my recommendation to check out Cassie Jay
/r/MensRights12/02/20 09:43 PM
3

Then I would recommend you take a look at the policy more politically influencial feminists are pushing/supporting and objectively ask yourself "Does this effect men and if so, How does it effect men". A good starting point would be watching Cassie Jaye's "The Red Pill"
/r/MensRights12/02/20 09:32 PM
2

That may be the definition but it's not an observed tenet or guiding value of the engaged activists.
/r/MensRights12/02/20 08:14 PM
20

You're putting a lot of words in conservatives mouths buddy. I personally disagree with nearly everything you've said.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 10:44 PM
1

I bit the bullet and read the comments. They amount to "this is totally a joke but actually wouldn't it be great if it were serious and men listened"
/r/MensRights11/02/20 10:38 PM
21

"if you loved me you'd cut off part of your penis" Yeah fuck that noise
/r/MensRights11/02/20 05:07 PM
13

Hearing your story is a breath of fresh air. It's easy to forget that not everyone buys into that garbage
/r/MensRights10/02/20 08:12 PM
1

I think the literally crippled part is from somewhere else in the thread where a dude broke her leg.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 07:53 PM
3

Careful, your nationalism is showing
/r/MensRights10/02/20 12:38 AM
3

"there is a wage gap, so I will only date people that have more money than me, encouraging a wage gap" lol
/r/MensRights09/02/20 07:43 PM
1

I love that she doesn't realize that the subtext to this arguement is it is impossible for women to choose to have sex. Like Women can't want or seek out sex lol
/r/MensRights08/02/20 05:09 PM
5

For someone that seems to take real issue with "woman hating" you seem to be quite the legitimate Man hater here. It's quite entertaining.
/r/MensRights07/02/20 01:45 PM
2

I just hope this isn't because of the pressure the studio is getting. I'm not a fan of cancelling. I'd much rather her be arrested and then we move on.
/r/MensRights07/02/20 01:34 PM
1

I mean, there is always going to be bitching but outside of that I see no issue with the talk here.
/r/MensRights07/02/20 01:14 PM
1

Ah so your point is you'd like to see more action and less talk?
/r/MensRights07/02/20 12:41 PM
3

I think you have a very skewed view of this sub that doesn't reflect us properly. Pointing out that men are overlooked and asking for any consideration is not the same as eternal victimhood. Eternal victimhood is being given a spot on national news to claim AC is sexist lol
/r/MensRights06/02/20 08:20 PM
6

I'd say this sub-reddits is more pro-male than anti-feminist. If Feminist activists were as pro-male as they claim to be you'd find we'd agree with them more.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 07:11 PM
5

The Duluth model comes up a lot because it was pushed to be the primary operation model for DV situations pushed by feminists. They may not have created it, but they are the reason it's used today. Now tbf about feminist theory. It really goes out the window when you look at what activists call for.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 03:53 PM
2

But see, no one is disagreeing that it's wrong for a man to hit a woman. We're simply adding that it is also wrong for a woman to hit a man.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 03:45 PM
4

Lol this has the potential to be a strong meme.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 05:13 AM
2

Couldn't of said it better myself.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 02:17 AM
38

But remember this society hates women smh ><
/r/MensRights04/02/20 09:44 PM
1

I've never met such a compassionate and caring individual such as yourself.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 12:05 AM
1

You're overwhelming hatred and lack of compassion for a single race is impressive
/r/MensRights02/02/20 11:56 PM
3

You basically just described MGTOW lol
/r/MensRights02/02/20 06:47 PM
-16

Yeah and?
/r/MensRights30/01/20 05:56 AM
-17

Honestly this reads like a highschool poetry project. There is value in the questions but stand alone it reads clunky, disjointedly, and roughly.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 02:38 AM
3

As far as attempts as selling marriage as exclusively wonderful go, this one is pretty half hearted and lazy
/r/MGTOW29/01/20 09:04 PM
9

I didn't realize girls in schools could use the men's room. I don't think they should in all fairness, there's separate rooms for a reason
/r/MensRights29/01/20 12:15 AM
3

Dude sounds about as mature and smart as a 14 year old so I wouldn't let him get to you. Argue as long as it's fun and ditch it as soon as it's stressful.
/r/MGTOW26/01/20 04:48 PM
4

Wtf is the word involuntary doing in there. Like she had no control over her part in the situation. "I didn't want to tell him suicide was the right answer, it just sorta happened whoops"
/r/MensRights23/01/20 10:58 PM
3

In what ways are men redundant? In what ways are men detrimental? Now reverse it. In what ways are women redundant? In what ways are women detrimental? You claim to have a fear that men can be replaced, but don't actually look into the unique traits of either gender.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 08:12 PM
4

I like the phrasing here "since I married my wife, I never beat my wife" This is vuage enough to beg the question. Did he beat his gfs? Did he beat her while she was a gf? Did be beat fiance's that left him? I assume none of this happened but I do like imagine him attempting to get physical with this Amazonian of a women and instead she kicked his ass until he proposed and now he's simping for life :p
/r/MGTOW23/01/20 03:43 AM
3

I was curious and did a quite Google search. First thing that pops up is. "Reproductive abuse is when a person tries to control your reproductive choices in order to control your life" From: https://www.womenslaw.org/about-abuse/forms-abuse/reproductive-abuse-and-coercion And wow I can't think of anything except family courts being the poster child for this lol
/r/MensRights22/01/20 10:27 PM
7

AWorldBuildByMenForMen SMH
/r/MensRights22/01/20 03:58 AM
0

The phrasing is so strange to me "should be allowed" like how many men are clammering about "what the fuck God I wish all my wasted sperm at death could go to someone, anyone even!"
/r/MensRights22/01/20 02:12 AM
2

This progression would not surprise me. Even if by some happen-stance it remains voluntary, I don't think it's be a wise idea.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 04:54 AM
2

If that's what the UK wants to do and it's voluntary go for it. I wouldn't recommend it though. I can only imagine this will further erode the family, and create a new type of gold digger that marries for sperm and either waits or encourages the death of their desired sperm donor.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 03:37 AM
-1

Lmao
/r/MensRights20/01/20 05:00 PM
0

You're right, the lessons of the past should bear no weight on your actions going forward. Good luck and God speed kiddo.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 01:40 PM
-1

Don't let the leftists find out. Last time I heard of a man funding a men's shelter he got protested and bullied until it shut down and he killed himself. https://www.google.com/amp/s/nationalpost.com/news/canada/earl-silverman-who-ran-mens-safe-house-dies-in-apparent-suicide/amp
/r/MensRights20/01/20 05:34 AM
3

I love his backwards logic. "If you don't give up control of your life and take a chance on the unknown you'll never take control of your life!" Like fucken what?
/r/MGTOW20/01/20 05:27 AM
3

You're taking my laughing and sarcasm far to seriously lol
/r/MensRights20/01/20 12:54 AM
34

Does this girl think boys are just born with an understanding of consent? Why does she think so little of girls/women claiming they just can't know what consent it lol.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 04:11 PM
1

The weak willed are out in force today...
/r/MensRights18/01/20 10:05 PM
5

Reducing ourselves to the pettyness of our rivals means we are no better than are rivals. A call to action like this is to willingly become what you disavow. You are free to do as you wish, but we will hold you to your hippocracy and happily disavow your pettyness should you complain of their underhanded tactics while engaging in those same tactics yourself.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 10:04 PM
3

Pretty sure if women went and hid behind a dumpster in an alleyway or behind some bush in a Forrest to breastfeed no one would approach them about it either
/r/MensRights18/01/20 06:16 PM
1

Not shying away from your dislikes is the first step, the next step is to learn to rely exclusively on yourself. Cook your own meals, unclog your own pipes, change your own tires, clean your own house ECT ECT. Self reliance breeds confidence. When no obstacle is to big socializing becomes easy. Your experience solving your own problems will help you solve others. The struggle of doing it alone will give you the empathy and compassion to help others.
/r/MGTOW17/01/20 10:46 PM
2

Dude should open a new bank account and let the shared account drain
/r/MGTOW16/01/20 06:50 PM
3

What did I just read?
/r/MensRights14/01/20 11:31 PM
4

What's funny is if we go along with it that means that no hyper liberal story or female directed story is more entertaining, thought provoking, or well executed, than the news XD
/r/MensRights14/01/20 10:11 PM
3

You got banned for including men That's a big no no dontchya know Edit* typo
/r/MensRights14/01/20 07:57 PM
7

Nah, it's a whole lot of bumblefucking around making small gains here and there while groups try to capitalize on momentum that all relies on men not putting their foot down and saying no more.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 12:28 AM
2

Honestly, women care more about men being alpha than most men.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 04:43 PM
15

"when she actually takes your breath away". Like it's fucking romantic, he forgot the second half though. "When she actually takes your breath away and holds it hostage until you learn to behave like the slave you are, and if you die? Who fucking cares, you're a slave, every day is a gift to be taken away at anytime. Be greatful for what breath you do get" Shits fucking horrifying
/r/MGTOW10/01/20 10:55 PM
4

I think on principal you are right. As long as a man has no say in a pregnancy, then he has no liability in the results of that pregnancy. I think the difficult issue here is, finding a path forward that allows a say from both parties fairly. Lieing in these situations is obsurdly powerful Primarily due to burden of proof and the insane difficulty in proving things around sexual relationships. Keeping things strictly legal and evidence based will only suck any and all joy out of sex with signed …
/r/MensRights10/01/20 10:50 PM
7

Feminism to me is fighting for gender equality and against pressures and injustices each gender faces Ok, what men's issues have you fought for and how effective was it?
/r/MensRights10/01/20 06:17 PM
6

I began to disagree with Feminism when I realized that held a "us first, them later" mindset which boils down to: No effort can be spent helping men until women are helped in all areas first. Basically as long as there are issues pertaining to women, men will have to wait. Which is how more casual feminists maintain that they are for equality while never getting to the point where it's men's turn for support. I out right abandoned feminism when I learned of the men's shelter, founded, financed a…
/r/MensRights10/01/20 06:14 PM
3

Well this took a turn...
/r/MensRights10/01/20 02:35 PM
3

Dude right, that's what had me laugh. Men have super blood or some shit now? XD
/r/MensRights10/01/20 02:22 PM
3

You're not wrong at all. It would be good, but it's up the individuals and outing one specific group is likely to discourage them from being charitable lol
/r/MensRights10/01/20 02:13 PM
14

Those damn men and shuffles cards their unwillingness to give us their blood
/r/MensRights10/01/20 01:11 PM
3

You seem to emit a large amount of negativity for someone that only experiences happiness lol
/r/MensRights08/01/20 04:27 AM
2

Lol funny troll, no one would take this speed seriously.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 04:25 AM
5

The term toxic masculinity is a bait and switch term as I understanding. In one context it's all thats wrong with hyper masculinity, then in the next it is the current patriarchal system in which we live. So it is simaltaniously a term to describe issues with the individual and the group. This makes it hard to pin down as it is both a set of actions, and also the set of beliefs of a group. Any attempt to box in the idea to a set of constants to be observed prompts a phase shift and it is a new e…
/r/MensRights07/01/20 10:21 PM
0

I don't think be that's unfair.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 05:38 AM
4

I hope you're consistent on this idea, and now just indifferent because it's happening to just men.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 05:17 AM
14

Men are the minority of voters and therefore less of an indicator on a politicians success. Media definitely doesn't care how men vote because reporting on that doesn't generate views/income. Politicians care because while 46%(ish) is a minority it's still a large chunk, but you won't hear them talk about it as much because it won't generate PR while talking about women and minority voters will.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 06:03 PM
6

on the one hand, glad you're making the best of it. On the other hand, don't tell everyone else the coolaide is fantastic just cuz you've already drank it :)
/r/MensRights05/01/20 03:16 AM
25

"So what is feminism stance on current family court laws/ what is feminism doing to fight for equality in family court laws?" <- legit responce "Oh nothing? So feminism isn't actually doing anything to fight patriarchy eh?" <- less often used, but highly rewarding follow up lol
/r/MensRights05/01/20 03:09 AM
2

How about fuck anyone that would tell me what I can and cannot drink! Brb gonna buy a gun so any idiot that tries to reclaim any anything can burn In hell
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/20 01:19 AM
1

"real men never cry" is such a straw man argument. I've had male friends growing up and know for a fact they cry. But they choose where they cry. They don't cry in tense situations. so its fairer to say "Real men don't cry under pressure, they resolve the conflict then find a comforting place to release their pain" whether that place is surrounded by friends, alone at home, in the company of their significant other, ect. "Man Up" is absolutely real in that, sometimes you need to put your thick s…
/r/MensRights04/01/20 07:17 AM
1

I didn't say chance of survival, I said level of success. Would you pick the man that owned his own home, Or the man that owned 3 homes, a private jet and a private yacht? The comparison increases to infinity. If you succeed more, own more, and provide more, then you attract more. Indefinitely. There is no upper limit to attraction Nothing about biology say's you need a private jet or yacht, only that the one that can give that to you is the one that can give you a life someone else cant.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 07:04 AM
1

Alright dude, Just remember you asked for this. You fail to address society's tendency to mock and put down such individuals.(incels and non-traditionally masculine males) Everyone is mocked by everyone for everything. people should stop focusing on why they're mocked, and start exemplifying why they're unique. And if nothing else you must recognize that there is not equality in treatment of such individuals across genders. WTF do you mean? women are mocked less than men? Men are mocked less tha…
/r/MensRights04/01/20 07:00 AM
2

Side note, I don't think a man's value comes from his success. But I think women's attraction to men comes from a man's ability to provide. I don't think a mans value is based on his ability to provide. I just think a man's quality of wife is based on his ability to provide for her.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 06:17 AM
1

Can I ask, is English your first language? If not I can understand the broken English of your post. Up to this point I figured you were a young English speaking adult and honestly find your posts hard as hell to understand.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 06:10 AM
1

before I invest to much time replying, I'm gonna give you a choice. Do you want me to reply off of the assumption I gathered from 3 incoherient lines of text. Or break down thought by thought how incoherient and unsubstantial this post is? Don't get me wrong i'm an MRA but you come off as someone that just marathoned 24 hours of CNN and have given aprox 0s to thinking about your thoughts...
/r/MensRights04/01/20 06:04 AM
2

I'm sorry, but your centered text "as opposed to aligned left" is murder to read. As far as beta males. I don't care for the term, but sure those that submit to others are often low preforming. And capitalism is a performance based system, so their looked down on in more ways than just sexual partners. Say you're going into business, do you want the dude that won't take no for an answer, or assumes no is the answer and doesn't bother? Finally ending your post in a martyr style hashtag doesn't re…
/r/MensRights04/01/20 04:52 AM
3

Keep your husband or the father around, and hold him to being a strong man involved in your son's growth. Scold him for being weak and distant, reward him for being strong and involved. Work with him to teach your son to be capable and independent then provide him with the tools to be successful.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 03:59 AM
1

This whole "representation" initiative is such a crap idea I can't believe it. Just because they'll have different ideas doesn't mean they'll be better let alone effective.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 01:15 AM
12

Men In choir, men in dance, men who draw, men who cook, men who are full time parents...
/r/MensRights04/01/20 12:49 AM
2

America was founded on civil disobedience and the over throw of oppression. If it gets bad enough it'll happen again
/r/MensRights04/01/20 12:45 AM
2

To answer your title, No I don't think so. Men are devalued no question asked, and some radicals thing they can do away with men in society. But that's shortsighted and just about every luxery dissappears with men.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 11:50 PM
8

Huh, I always thought paying for a woman was apart of that toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 10:12 PM
21

I generally respond with: "Real or not, they call themselves feminists and they're the ones making change, so they're the ones I'm concerned with".
/r/MensRights02/01/20 02:47 PM
2

Correct me if I'm wrong but there's still technically tax benifiets with marriage. Just the divorce side is entirely stacked against the man and marriage. Side note: In programming giving a key word two different definitions/functionality I'd called overloading a term. And generally frowned upon as a programming process because if you call an overloaded term improperly it crashes your whole program. Which is an oddly apt parralel to real life.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 04:25 AM
2

I saw this picture years ago, and back then it made a lot of sense you know. Like "why would the tall guy need a box he can see fine" Fast forward to today and I realize it's not a question of who needs the boxes, it's a question of where the boxes came from. Did they all make their own box? If so did they all make 1 or enough for themselves to see? Did they all make one box and then the tall guy had to give his away because it was unfair that he could see without it? If so why did he have to ma…
/r/MensRights01/01/20 03:01 AM
5

That sub is a minority, about 5k members spewing some of the foulest of hatred. They actually think being born male is a disease comfortable to the flu, aides, black plague ect.
/r/MensRights01/01/20 02:53 AM
1

Honestly if you look at Japanese dating (watch tarace house on Netflix for an example) marriage in the states is basically "becoming official" or being a boyfriend/girlfriend in Japan. It's kinda of rediculous tbh
/r/MensRights30/12/19 01:42 AM
4

In the current system not much. I can not by any means criticise any man that wants nothing to do with marriage in today's systems. Conceptually though, marriage as a system to encourage men to find a partner in life, get a race break for that, then teach and prepare their offspring to be ready to tackle life and succeed. Both in terms of tax breaks to support those offspring, but then when they are as capable as he trained them. Have them as support when he can no longer work. If I know men, th…
/r/MensRights30/12/19 01:39 AM
2

I see your point, and would like to rephrase. Divorce is entirely one-sided and in full control of that side. Easy enough to be initiated and the pace towards closure entirely at their demand. So when I said they're to easy to get, I was thinking of this one sided scenario and didn't think of the edge case of a divorce being initiated and not finished in a timly Manor. I'd agree that wife's have to much control in this sense and husbands do not. But I'll retain my position that more access to co…
/r/MensRights30/12/19 01:30 AM
3

In what way? Is divorce not already to easy?
/r/MensRights30/12/19 01:17 AM
16

Abolishing marriage doesn't make any sense. There needs to be some reform so it's not so one sided for sure. But doing away with it all together feels a lot like throwing out the baby with the bathwater
/r/MensRights30/12/19 12:23 AM
2

idk what happened to Belle, But Kacey is obviously parodying her here.
/r/MGTOW28/12/19 05:51 PM
16

"Dont say it like that, cuz then it sounds like I'm just a jerk" holy christ
/r/MensRights20/12/19 03:00 AM
3

I've known people like that (not exactly the same, but they people seemingly hell bent on having shit happen to them so they can "reach out") Boundaries are good, don't let her walk all over you.
/r/MGTOW20/12/19 01:40 AM
3

Emotional tampon might of bit of a dig if that's your concern. Otherwise I don't see anything wrong with your side
/r/MGTOW20/12/19 01:34 AM
35

This reminds me of that old episode of family Guy where Peter makes a club house for the husband's of the neighborhood and the wives take it over using these exact steps lol
/r/MensRights17/12/19 03:00 PM
1

Phew well that's good to hear.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:41 AM
0

I find this interesting as one of the primary functions of a pharmacy is to fill prescriptions. There are medicines only available through pharmacy's so to allow pharmacists to refuse service would lead to a lot of problems. Like imagine an Anti-vaxer becoming a pharmacist and denying vaxcines because of their moral objections lmao.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 03:07 PM
1

Because in most cases even a toxic relationship gives a man more attention and affection than being single.
/r/MGTOW13/12/19 06:07 PM
9

Let me go grab Karen Straughans thoughts on the idea that the extreme feminist ideas that get called out here are a minority and fit to be ignored because (while true) there are less extreme feminists out there. We all know they give more moderate members of the movement a bad wrap, but that's not the issue. It's the extreme members success that is the issue. But Karen says it the best: So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, an…
/r/MensRights13/12/19 04:28 AM
5

I love how social construct is supposed to sound bad. Like bitch manners and politeness are social constructs too, we supposed to blame those for hating women too?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen12/12/19 10:49 PM
18

Legit got a chuckle out of this lol. Didn't even notice the dude until I read the headline
/r/MensRights09/12/19 08:17 PM
3

In a strange and unacceptable way she is right. Women are born with value while men are not in societies. What she doesn't seem to understand is this teaches boys and men to earn their value and women to coast on their inherited value. So ironically this women will waste her value away claiming men have no value, while men around her will only become more valuable. It's almost poetic. That all said I think it is wrong that boys are not born with the same value placed in them as girls. It really …
/r/MensRights08/12/19 05:00 PM
5

That's not what I said. I said you're different. There might be others that agree with you. But the power figures making change in the name of feminism, they disagree with you. And they impact the lives of men far more than you do. So your stance and experience is irrelevant until you change the path that feminism is taking today
/r/MensRights21/11/19 02:56 AM
3

Just because you call yourself a feminist and support men's right does not mean that feminism and feminist activists do not act in direct opposite to men's right or place the burden of their woes on men. Good for you for being different but that's just it, you're different from the norm.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 02:49 AM
15

While I agree with your message, you frame it in a really unpalpable way. I agree we shouldn't stoop to baseless hatred. And there is some rash behavior here that slips through from time to time. But the way you see this as misogyny leads me to believe you see that word as interchangable with male focus. Which spoiler alert a group focused on men's rights will be male focused. I agree with the mods here. It's up to us to point out the bad behavior and not resort to blanket "you can't say or disc…
/r/MensRights14/10/19 11:05 PM
-3

You do you boo
/r/MensRights02/10/19 05:34 PM
2

The wording is a but harsher than I think this post calls for but it really sums up the difference of self identifying feminists and the activists or figure heads. The people making big changes off of ideology and such.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 03:27 PM
8

I think Karen straughan (sp) put it the best. It's a bit of a read but really addresses questions like this. "So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with thousands and thousands of members all of whom call themselves feminists... the…
/r/MensRights02/10/19 03:05 PM
1

This reads like virgin satire
/r/MensRights25/09/19 09:18 PM
1

Just wanted to come back many hours later to say you've got some good points. I had to stop replying because I wasn't prepared for an intense debate while at work. I'd say in general you're not wrong, and at first glance, I mistook your ferocity with aggressive absolutism. I'd agree that getting rid of the social barriers that kept strong men from being in leadership roles with youth would be good
/r/MensRights19/09/19 02:49 AM
1

See idc about representation though. Take the barriers of entry away and let people do what they want
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:54 PM
2

Forcibly changing a culture to fit a desired results sounds like brain washing. Or rather forcibly changing everyone's out look on a subject to make that subject more appeal to a group.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:44 PM
2

Sounds like brain washing to me
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:08 PM
84

I see your point but I'd be willing to bet there are fewer men than you suspect wishing for some of the more destructive privileges you mention. And if they do you should probably be wary of that person.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 12:36 AM
43

I love the "I won't just give opinions cuz you asked" "Asks for opinion on something else" "HERES MY OPINION!!" Smh
/r/MensRights11/09/19 01:10 PM
20

If we can expect men to not have sex to avoid this, why can't we expect women to not have sex to avoid abortions?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen10/09/19 12:46 PM
1

Lol what did Canadians do??
/r/MensRights09/09/19 07:30 PM
2

Op why are you so obsessed with everyone here getting a girlfriend? Lol
/r/MensRights06/09/19 12:41 PM
10

I do find it interesting how they all sound identical
/r/MensRights20/08/19 03:19 PM
25

I get the vibe that you haven't read many of the posts here. This sub reddit primarily points out the rights men don't have or the injustices men face. While there is some opposition to feminism here, it's not just to be spiteful.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 02:31 PM
1

I think your interpretation of this is a bit limited. The security of a free state means that the people are free from any government, even it's own. So this right includes the right of the people to bear arms against it's own government should the people feel it is taking to much control/freedom. So in that right the militia Is any Minuteman that would take up arms against an army. The draft here has a part to play but little to do with the true value here. The value being that us civilians and…
/r/MensRights17/08/19 11:27 PM
3

A stark reminder that it doesn't matter who you are as a man. Just what you have to either give, or have taken away.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 11:25 PM
5

She just used a fucking wedge as the seat instead of a circle or square. Thing looks like a light breeze would blow it over.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 11:22 PM
21

That's actually a really interesting and funny point. If you can't be racist, then it can be interpreted that you can't hold power, or the power you hold in the racial hierarchy can't change. So ultimately all races are predestined to be exactly where they are in the hierarchy and all liberals/feminists can do is bitch about it without ever needing to seek real solutions.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 07:53 PM
2

They would rather the discussion be able women's issues first, can't deal with the men's issues cuz they've got it better and can wait. The worst will actually claim that a men's issues is secretly a women's issue.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 01:25 AM
3

I want men to be able to talk about men's issues, how they want to talk about men's issues, when they want to talk about men's issues, without women telling men otherwise.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 01:01 AM
2

Which hardships don't exist if that's not to much of a hardships to burden you with
/r/MensRights01/07/19 01:39 AM
2

I just don't get an answer lol
/r/MensRights01/07/19 01:30 AM
2

So...?
/r/MensRights01/07/19 01:20 AM
1

I'm rocking that mobile life ATM so it's either text here or text there...
/r/MensRights30/06/19 11:49 PM
2

At least as far as I've seen from the top posts of this subreddit. The discussion is more about hardships men face as opposed to male oppression. So I'm curious where you're hearing that men are oppressed and by what?
/r/MensRights30/06/19 11:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter