TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

QueerCoup Archive

View 0 posts and 63 comments by QueerCoup on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Bearded white dudes, of course.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 12:36 AM
4

When 52% of the voters are women, and 100% of the parties are misogynistic, what do you get? Women voting for misogynists.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 12:09 AM
4

But it defines patriarchy to include men's chivalrous sacrificial impulse to protect women, which when you think about it, does not count as a male advantage... That's called a nuance. Yes, chivalry is patriarchal, it demeans women by treating them as helpless and needing to be cared for. That puts them in a subordinate position to men. That many men do not want to be forced into the provider role is why the concerns that many of you have here are actually feminist concerns. Don't want to pay al…
/r/MensRights12/06/11 08:05 PM
2

I think transparency is good, but there are times when it's not, you just have to rely on your own judgement.
/r/MensRights12/12/10 08:32 PM
2

Nothing now, it's too late. But in the future, if someone is posting personal information, try not to draw attention to it with a post like this one. All I'm saying is you shot yourself in the foot.
/r/MensRights12/12/10 08:17 PM
2

I'm referring to this thread, the one we are conversing in. It's kind of a moot point by now because it's falling off the front page but by making this post you gave a platform to the content you were trying to discourage.
/r/MensRights12/12/10 07:32 PM
2

The posting of the contact info is what I'm referring to.
/r/MensRights12/12/10 06:36 PM
2

you don't have the power to delete your own post?
/r/MensRights12/12/10 06:35 PM
1

Except that it's not to hard to find the objectionable info thanks to this highly upvoted post about it.
/r/MensRights12/12/10 12:28 AM
1

TheEnlightener is a white supremacists, not a feminist. I would imagine you have more white supremacists here than feminist trolls.
/r/MensRights12/12/10 12:11 AM
3

You realize in making this post people can still find the info by going to theEnlighteners overview right? I would suggest deleting this too.
/r/MensRights11/12/10 11:59 PM
1

I find this whole thread, and this comment in particular, incredibly ironic.
/r/MensRights03/12/10 03:09 PM
7

I would suggest not going to /r/seduction for help. Maybe /r/TwoXChromosomes, or /r/feminisms will have some good advice for you.
/r/seduction24/11/10 08:59 PM
2

I figured that's be redundant since it occured in an anarchist reddit.
/r/MensRights16/11/10 08:02 PM
1

Feminist coup, actually.
/r/MensRights16/11/10 07:59 PM
6

It's true, he's been a reluctant feet dragger this whole time.
/r/MensRights16/11/10 07:22 PM
3

That's a pretty hilariously ignorant interpretation of how thing really played out.
/r/MensRights16/11/10 07:21 PM
2

But where does the role of provider come from? Is it how our parents raised us, is it women that expect us to be providers? is it general societal pressure? The first question is answered by expanding on the answer to the others, yes. Our parents raise us according to patriarchal standards. Many women expect to be taken care of because they are socialized under patriarchy. Patriarchy is a general societal pressure. The role of provider comes from the patriarchy. Regarding consent standards, they…
/r/MensRights27/10/10 04:13 PM
1

I'm not suprised you're so shocked about my statment, this mostly middleclass white movement has absolutely no analysis of the struggles of men of color, just like feminism historically. You all should call yourselves "Middle Class White Men's Rights." Rapists are convicted on hear-say every day Repeating a dubious claim doesn't make it any less dubious.
/r/MensRights27/10/10 03:54 PM
4

Alimony has nothing to do with feminism.
/r/MensRights26/10/10 07:00 PM
3

I'm saying patriarchy helps men dominate women and other men. Prison sentences for men are longer and harsher for men for the same crimes; that's the law backing patriarchy? It's partly due to the patriarchal assumption that women are meek and subdued, but it's mostly the law backing white supremacy by targeting black men. Female sex offenders are often seen in a court of law as troubled, but men are seen as scum that do not deserve to live; that's the law backing patriarchy? Yes, because adoles…
/r/MensRights26/10/10 06:04 PM
1

?? explain?
/r/MensRights26/10/10 05:46 PM
1

I came off as defending alimony, true, I didn't intend to. What I really mean is that alimony is the states way of enforcing gender roles. If you subjugate someone and make someone dependent on you, you can't just cast them out, you have to help them get on their feet. I'm not defending that because I don't advocate the initial subjugation (marriage) but I can see where a subjugated person would demand help getting on their feet.
/r/MensRights26/10/10 05:39 PM
2

Then what's the point of a divorce What's the point of marriage?
/r/MensRights26/10/10 05:33 PM
2

Those are some of the ways men are oppressed under patriarchy. I am absolutely aware of the nonexistence of legal equality and how the law backs patriarchy and capitalism. That's why I'm an anarchist and not a liberal feminist.
/r/MensRights26/10/10 05:27 PM
-1

Going on the offensive against reactionaries while simultaneously defending against them is not hypocracy, it's a sensible strategy for revolution. BTW, that thread where I defended Solonas was in /r/feminisms, not /r/MR.
/r/MensRights26/10/10 05:24 PM
3

That depends on the symptom, I'll address the two that seem to be big ones around here. alimony, child-support: Stop playing into the gender-roles that put you in the postion of provider. When you are in control of the income, you have to expect that you are going to have to continue that role after the divorce. Stop paying for dates (and dating women that expect you to), help with childcare as an equal and play a nutruring role in their lives. "false-rape" charges: I'm not saying they don't exi…
/r/MensRights26/10/10 05:21 PM
-2

I acknowledge them and recognize that they are a symptom of patriarchy.
/r/MensRights25/10/10 05:34 PM
-8

Dear /r/mensrights, STAY THE FUCK OUT OF OUR REDDIT. Fuck you very much
/r/MensRights25/10/10 04:05 PM
1

rapist.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 07:55 PM
-4

Yes. People would rather think about boobs then prostates. I blame patriarchy.
/r/MensRights09/10/10 09:24 PM
-2

Well, it is breast cancer awareness month. Did it look like that a week and a half ago?
/r/MensRights09/10/10 09:11 PM
2

(barely) more women die from said gender-specific cancers. You don't think that's relevant?
/r/MensRights09/10/10 09:05 PM
0

The fact that you can't think of anything outside of "talk her into it" (the appearance of consent through coercion) or just doing it anyway confirms that you are a piece of shit rapist.
/r/MensRights04/10/10 04:41 PM
-1

once you talk them into it rapist
/r/MensRights03/10/10 06:46 PM
0

You're a piece of shit rapist. "She was asking for it" is still rape, you fucking pig.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 06:41 PM
3

Adoptions are consensual, what the OP describes is not. For fuck sake, if you don't want a child put on a condom, or get a vasectomy or sleep with men.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 05:48 PM
2

What you describe is not casual sex, you're describing lying about your identity and motives to impregnate someone. What makes you think you are entitled to force your DNA on someone like that? That kind of self-entitled thinking is why you and others on this reddit think that false rape charges are "epidemic." Casual sex requires consent and consent requires honesty about yourself and your intentions. A jewel thief does not take what they want with consent.
/r/MensRights03/10/10 05:42 PM
-1

tl;dr: be an unrepentant rapist.
/r/MensRights02/10/10 08:34 PM
2

The simplest definition that most feminists can agree with is "opposition to patriarchy." It's not about equal rights, or gender balance, it's about doing away with gendered power dynamics.
/r/MensRights02/10/10 08:31 PM
1

As does the rest of the anarchist movement.
/r/MensRights16/09/10 04:14 PM
-2

I think you are talking about the sub headline in bold. The first paragraph only mentions a flotilla with an all female crew.
/r/MensRights22/08/10 07:16 PM
-5

That one is a little misleading since it only refers to the last paragraph.
/r/MensRights22/08/10 06:55 PM
1

How about the one the web site uses, "Power of Women Protest Movements"
/r/MensRights22/08/10 06:25 PM
-5

worst headline ever.
/r/MensRights22/08/10 05:54 PM
2

And now you're belittling me, does it make you feel strong to bully people online?
/r/MensRights17/08/10 07:09 AM
3

You are making a lot of assumptions about me and I don't appreciate it.
/r/MensRights16/08/10 09:26 PM
1

I didn't buy an pink and girly thing, everyone else did. So when she was born she was surrounded by the sort of things society expects her to like.
/r/MensRights16/08/10 07:27 PM
1

You have a subtle way of twisting people's words.
/r/MensRights16/08/10 06:48 AM
1

And so you'd use your experience with testosterone and socialization enforce your idea of what boys should do? Don't bother with the psuedo-science, no amount sciencish rhetoric will convince me boys shouldn't be allowed to knit if they want to.
/r/MensRights16/08/10 06:46 AM
1

Babies are socialize while inutero, from the moment the ultrasound says, "IT'S A GIRL!" all of their possessions are pink and girly, I don't need a study to prove that, just a daughter.
/r/MensRights16/08/10 06:42 AM
1

Wow! You know it's kind of creepy to go through someone post history and twist and mangle their words to prove a completely unrelated point that has nothing to do with anything they've said. If fact, it make you come off as a gender essentialist, transphobic fuck. I guess I should have expected it when I wandered into this forum.
/r/MensRights16/08/10 06:39 AM
3

But take society away, lord of the flies style if you must, and you get boys playing ball and catching bugs, not knitting. Any basis for that claim?
/r/MensRights15/08/10 09:22 PM
2

i don't see how that's relevant, it has nothing to do with gender roles.
/r/MensRights15/08/10 08:43 PM
5

Those kids had already been subject to socialization.
/r/MensRights15/08/10 08:42 PM
1

physiological, and therefore genetic non-sequitor, physiology is more than genetics, it includes hormones, for example.
/r/MensRights15/08/10 08:39 PM
2

What's the backing for that claim?
/r/MensRights15/08/10 08:37 PM
2

If society in general imposed a gender role from birth that said "boys love knitting" then you could teach a boy to love knitting. Since there is no social conditioning to make boys love knitting, a parent would have a hard time making their son love knitting. Nice strawpersyn.
/r/MensRights15/08/10 08:34 PM
0

Brains are shaped by our surroundings, or our socialization.
/r/MensRights15/08/10 07:42 PM
3

That's not what the article says at all.
/r/MensRights15/08/10 07:41 PM
3

The article is talking about ability not biological funtion.
/r/MensRights15/08/10 07:40 PM
3

Good job, your title made it sexist and racist.
/r/MensRights12/08/10 10:33 PM
0

They are saying she was never the opposite sex. A transwoman is and always was a woman. Does a woman have to tell her fiancée that she had some plastic surgery?
/r/MensRights21/07/10 11:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter