TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Quick_Lime3331 Archive

View 0 posts and 34 comments by Quick_Lime3331 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Exactly. Heck I plan on just homeschooling for my family. It’s way more affordable, it allows me to teach my children in a way more efficient and effective way, and I get to spend more time with my kids to instill values and virtues. I think those who can do that, should most definitely do that. (But that’s just my opinion).
/r/MensRights18/12/25 01:40 AM
12

Very much, that’s why I barely trust the school system in general.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 01:35 AM
34

On paper that works, but in reality 99.9% of the time the victim always gets punished, they are actively punishing self-defense.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 01:33 AM
48

To be fair even when they attempt to, they still manage to screw it up. (Zero fight tolerance).
/r/MensRights18/12/25 01:01 AM
15

Go fuck yourself, he was murdered in front of his wife and children. You are no better than those who celebrate his death.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 06:00 AM
1

The reason we have traditional gender roles is because on average both men and women prefer those roles. That’s not to say that no one would want the other, it’s that ok average men and women want traditional roles.
/r/MensRights04/08/25 05:53 PM
3

Yeah it’s unfortunate that many modern women are like that. Though I do hope for a future that am lucky enough to find a good woman who wants traditional marriage and wants a family. My biggest goal is create a family and a long lasting legacy.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 09:00 AM
5

So based on the Court case. It definitely seems that the School district is in violation of the 1st Amendment and 1964 Civil Rights Act, and Title IX.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 12:06 AM
1

Almost all precedents of court rulings say otherwise. Especially title IX rulings. Also this platform has admitted to refusing men onto the platform, violating civil rights act. And yeah my bad. It was 1964.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 05:33 AM
2

You can subpoena tech companies to reveal the accounts personal information, like what Ethan Cline is doing to the H3 Snark Subreddit mods. You could do the same thing.
/r/MensRights24/07/25 05:25 AM
4

Sure, I probably could’ve said it better.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 06:53 AM
9

In a vacuum it does. But with societal context it doesn’t. Again am I’m favor of this. I think it does make it more fair towards men.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 06:50 AM
5

Okay then.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 04:15 AM
0

Which part?
/r/MensRights23/07/25 04:13 AM
46

I have read there law and it’s pretty sound and fairly fair to both sides, it kinda favors men, but not extremely. As much as I despise that government and philosophy (West Taiwan), I will commend them for this. We need more protections for men here in the States.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 04:09 AM
2

That’s fair. But am pro-life so theres that.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 05:49 PM
7

Yep
/r/MensRights20/07/25 05:49 PM
48

Because it’s easier to blame the man than it is to blame the woman. I think they’re both shit people, and both should be publicly shamed. Cheating is one of the worst things you can do.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 07:32 AM
2

Am not sure either. Am just explaining it the best way that I remember.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 06:41 PM
2

Yeah… criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research, are all examples.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 03:05 AM
2

From Google AI: “Yes, the concept of fair use in U.S. copyright law applies to everyone within the United States. It's a legal exception that allows the use of copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder under certain circumstances. This applies to individuals, corporations, and both commercial and non-commercial entities.”
/r/MensRights17/07/25 02:58 AM
1

Sure, but that’s different than going to court over it.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 02:48 AM
2

Fair use applies to everyone. Regardless. Am not a lawyer either.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 02:48 AM
1

Sure they can’t, but in order to have standing in a court room, you need to be able to have proven damages to get past motion to dismiss.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 02:14 AM
1

Sure, but you can still use copyrighted images for selective use. Including reporting/news coverage which by technicality they are doing that.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 02:13 AM
1

Fair enough, thank you. My point still remains; What do you propose has a solution.
/r/MensRights16/07/25 06:34 AM
1

Hmmm your right, I thought that juxtaposed meant introducing an idea. It means: Place or deal with close together with contrasting effect. My bad. Still my point stands.
/r/MensRights16/07/25 05:59 AM
1

Then what do you juxtapose for a solution.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 07:52 PM
3

It is true that Apps take it seriously, so you could get the app to take it down, though I don’t know about a full suit over it though.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 04:16 AM
8

Umm potentially, though I could see that. A 1964 civil rights act violation. Edit: fixing date.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 04:15 AM
2

Ah yes, thank you for the correction. However, technically your right, however, they can still use it, since they’re not profiting off of it, and they are using it a transformative way (news-coverage, though it may be a weak argument). Also for a copyright suit you would need to have standing, what damages did they cause due to stealing your creative work.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 04:14 AM
17

Maybe a class-action defamation suit against both the platform and several individuals within, but that’s even a stretch. They’re not infringing on copyright, free use. But I get your sentiment and agree with you. Edit: I meant fair use
/r/MensRights14/07/25 03:21 AM
2

There is a solution to this. And this expands to a majority of the legal system, we have to keep Judges accountable. We should impeach more judges who are corrupt and care more about their looks and appearance. Also I kindly ask if you can break your body text into paragraphs.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 07:23 PM
3

No! Hatred based upon an immutable characteristic is wrong. Regardless of the circumstances. Hate and be ruthless to those who hurt you. Never to those who didn’t. We shouldn’t blame modern individuals based upon their ancestors actions. That’s like hating a German individual for what the Nazis did. That’s like hating Japanese individuals for what United 731 did. That’s like hating Caucasian individuals for what slavers did. Thats like saying you should go to jail because your dad committed murd…
/r/MensRights13/07/25 04:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter