TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Quick_Question_guy Archive

View 2 posts and 100 comments by Quick_Question_guy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It's based on many factors and can be manipulated, at the DNA level if needed. EDIT: I should have explained why it needs to be removed...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/18 05:00 PM
1

Women's incessant need to feel inferior and submissive to a man in order to be sexually/romantically attracted and respectful to him is a disgusting and obsolete remnant of a long passed past that will be removed.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/18 03:57 PM
0

How is it nonsense?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/18 02:23 AM
1

Because there's no way to stop people from having those things. There is, but let us ignore that for now. Let us assume that there is a way to change what people are attracted to/their preferences/etc. Why would it be immoral to eliminate obsolete artifacts of sexual attraction, that evolved 200,000 years ago in a radically different environment, in favor of a new model of attraction more suited to this modern environment?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 09:09 PM
1

This. I was looking for this.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 06:21 PM
1

People are entitled to their personal preferences, turn ons, and turn offs Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 05:44 PM
1

Fat people in general just show a lack of control and discipline, there's not much wrong with not being attracted to them. Her "disgust" (she's most likely using hyperbole) of short men is just her fisherian runaway acting. It can be manipulated and changed, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 04:25 PM
1

I still don't understand how private property eliminates tournament selection. It only adds more variables into the fitness rating function. EDIT: it's also not a ritual thing, it increases fitness in the offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 04:05 PM
1

Nuptial gifts exist across species. It has nothing to do with private property as conceptualized by humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 04:00 PM
1

Why would private property disable tournament selection? Also, our mating strategies are innate, you can preform brain scans and see how dopamine and serotonin bind to the D1 and D2 nucleus accumbens in different people during pair bonding, and from there see how people behave sexually (pair bonding, harem based, etc).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 01:12 PM
1

Why would you want to feel masculine? Or feminine? Neither are things to care about. They're not even real.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 05:35 AM
1

Oh, it was a joke? I didn't get it lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 05:28 AM
2

I think there are bigger problems. Incels are a small minority, and they're made out to be worse than they are. They're a scapegoat.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 05:13 AM
2

You say this as though it's not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 05:05 AM
2

I didn't realize there were real people who believed things like this. I always thought it was a caricature.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 04:45 AM
0

When are we gonna see a male Shulamith Firestone? I'm right here, but radical feminists, for the most part, are jokes. I do not intend to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 04:25 AM
2

Peter Thiel has said that giving women the right to vote was the biggest mistake of the century, and he's fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 03:57 AM
1

Read up on this stuff https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mating_system You are describing polygynandry, or "communal breeding" mating strategies. It's a form of tournament selection. However, in humans and primates it usually becomes polygyny. This is not to be allowed. The goal is pair-bonding monogamy, not any form of tournament selection.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 12:05 AM
1

Men aren't lacking anything. Women aren't doing anything wrong either. The species just has too many artifacts remaining from our evolutionary past.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/18 11:30 PM
1

This, but it has other effects on women then just increasing libido.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/18 11:25 PM
3

I was thinking this as well. Clearly hypocritical. Of course, the solution is eliminating both strategies/behaviors.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/18 11:09 PM
2

No, like the other user Ercole said polygamy is AF/BB. We are not a polygamous species, females do not give birth in litters and females can not gestate fetuses from multiple males at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/18 11:06 PM
1

I made a thread very similar to this one a week ago or so.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/18 11:04 PM
1

That's the goal, maybe even more pronounced.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/18 03:22 AM
1

Masculinity and the male gender role has been completely rendered obsolete. Note that this DOES NOT MEAN men are obsolete, don't think of it like that. Anyway, there's no purpose for it anymore. The only reason that it would have any need to still exist, is because modern women are still in some ways wired to find it attractive, they are attracted to not just males, but 'masculine', 'dominant' males (who don't need to exist). The solution, of course, is to change women's preferences. Their fishe…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/18 12:19 AM
2

Eliminate male sexuality to stop rape/violence against women? Why throw the baby out with the bathwater? Just remove men's physical dominance over women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/18 11:57 PM
1

What an inefficient way of doing things...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 07:47 PM
10

So do many virgin men though, the idea that incels are all neets or whatever is false.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 07:37 PM
1

thanks
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 06:16 PM
2

Nature made us pair-bond through sex in a way men don't, so it's up to us to protect ourselves. Only some women and men are pair-bonding monogamous style sexual selection. The majority of men and women are tournament style.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 05:28 PM
2

The Idea of "AMALT" or "AWALT" makes no sense. Different hormone balances changes how an individual acts, let alone the sexes considered as a set. AMALT and AWALT is false.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 05:26 PM
1

Is "TERP" a play on "TERFs"? What does it mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 05:24 PM
1

Men and women both can be analyzed and reprogrammed to be better suited for the modern environment. Feminist's ideas are usually not good, for women or men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/18 08:50 PM
3

But it's false. Why believe it?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/18 08:22 PM
1

Rigor is not autism.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/18 08:21 PM
1

There is nothing wrong with mathematicians.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/18 08:19 PM
3

This is false. You don't actually believe this, do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/18 08:18 PM
1

Ah, I thought you meant like a singularity or fully automated economy or something. My mistake
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/18 05:16 PM
4

Nope, I actually know how these technologies work, this is my research.Kurzweil et al. are either straight up lying about their capabilities and how fast they're growing, or they're just hopeless optimists. Most people extrapolate Moore's "law" and apply it to all technology, it's one of the dumbest things that has become common belief imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/18 04:57 PM
5

What you are describing is simply the obsolete tournament based selection strategy that many (not all) women still have. It can be removed, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/18 04:25 PM
4

Some weird program where they assign men to a mate? This is idiotic if you think this is eugenics This is just as much a Eugenics program. I made a thread about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/18 04:20 PM
3

This is a great exaggeration, things aren't going to be automated any time soon.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/18 04:14 PM
2

Just eliminate them
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 10:22 PM
1

I'm not just describing monogamous society, that is not doing what I'm talking about justice at all. Monogamous societies also did not necessarily fail, to say that a society that practiced monogamy and fell did so because it practiced monogamy is incredibly simplistic and stupid. I'm not a virgin, you can have opinions about sexuality that don't involve stupid red pill ideology and not be a virgin lol You do not understand sexual selection strategies or how dna combination works well enough to …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 06:21 PM
3

This is not true. Humans as a whole carry a lot of obsolete programming, that should be corrected. Men and women both.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 06:06 PM
2

Being correct has nothing to do with what the majority of ignorant people believe. History doesn't show anything like what I'm talking about either, the society I'm describing is beyond anything that could have existed in the past. Humans carry a lot of obsolete and inferior programming from our hunter gatherer past.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 05:58 PM
1

I don't have time rn to answer everything. My undergrad is a double major in mathematics and computer science, I'm going to a grad program for bio informatics. The engineered humans will have a massive advantage against inferior non engineered people.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 05:52 PM
1

No, you didn't. You at most showed how attempting monogamy in a tournament species doesn't work (although it somewhat does, monogamy created the vast majority of civilization and there are already monogamous pair bonding humans). I'm talking about engineering humans to be naturally monogamous. Like dude, the dark ages were caused by rats spreading the plague, not monogamy, and the Renaissance were monogamous lmao. I also doubt you understand genetics or math at the level I do, I'll explain later…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 04:53 PM
1

None of it is false, rather all of your misconceptions are. When I get home and can write from my computer I will do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 04:40 PM
1

You have not read anything I've written in the thread, you need to do so in order to understand
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 04:33 PM
1

There is no such thing as negative genetic load, or evolutionary stagnation. There is only survival. Monogamous based strategies are just as efficient a reproductive strategy, and in fact produce brilliant phenotypes and amazing creatures - look at the beautiful feather patterns of many birds. Humans are at no risk of losing our domination if we switch to a monogamous larger-female species. In fact, I venture to say with this obsolete reproductive baggage eliminated, we will all be more focused …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 04:06 PM
2

I'm going to graduate school, I'm not an incel or a NEET or anything like that. You have it all wrong. I'm actually quite handsome and do well with women, whether or not you believe me. Again I implore you to read the thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 03:59 PM
1

I'm content in my life. I think that you and I may have very different ideologies that make each other's ideas seem terrible. Still, have you read any of the stuff I've written elsewhere in the thread? Perhaps it will convince you,or at least open you up to the possibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 03:42 PM
3

This has been addressed multiple times in the thread. Tl;dr: you're wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 03:26 PM
1

I'm sorry! I didn't mean it to be weird or in a weird way, just like a have a nice day or something. I guess it's not the same, sorry. I think it's pretty clear that I don't really care about that stuff that just holds us back. I'm not a physician either, I studied mathematics in undergrad and I'm going into either bio informatics or something similar. Pair bonding doesn't start until puberty, plus rape happens in any system and is bad, and why would you rape someone when you already have a lovi…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 01:11 PM
1

Altering an adult isn't easy, the few techniques we have are cumbersome. The best one involves taking their DNA, growing it in a culture, mixing it with like an oxygengas, and having them breath in a gas mask so their lungs and bloodstream pick up all the new dna viruses and carries it throughout the body into every cells, so it can inject the new dna into the nucleus of the cells and then over the course of a few weeks replace all their cells and old dna with the new code. I don't think you can…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 12:59 PM
1

Very nice, although humans are more complex in our behavior.i don't pretend like we can solve everything, but we can solve this
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 12:28 PM
1

So you are in agreement. Nice!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 12:27 PM
1

What? I don't understand what that means
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 12:26 PM
2

Not just my life is harder, every other person's life is as well. It's not my choice nor anyone else's to be a tournament based species, and it's no one's fault. That doesn't mean it's okay, or should stay. It's not okay and must be eliminated.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 12:25 PM
1

I'm glad you're beginning to see!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 05:51 AM
5

You're grasping at straws, and don't understand optimization
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 05:41 AM
1

There is nothing idiotic about what I'm saying. Your point would only hold weight if all ideals were equal. They are not, most are bad, and mine are great. Also, people engage in worthless destructive behaviors all the time. I do not accept some democratic argument, that just because the majority are doing something, that it is valuable and should be allowed. Tournament based selection is not valuable, actively destructive, and must be eliminated.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 05:31 AM
1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 02:42 AM
1

So they're helping move the economy. A person does not choose their genes in either case, so helping them and the species as a whole is no more or less forceful than just forcing their "natural" genes on them (also natural does not necessarily mean good). I don't see why someone would cheat, although it may happen after many years in some cases. Still better than tournament selection. I will answer more tomorrow or later tonight, I'm headed out to a bar rn to meet up with peeps.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 02:36 AM
1

People are more competent in marriages with families. Ok, you don't believe in abortion then obviously my other point doesn't work. Still though, every single person, as well as every life form, is "forcibly genemodded" at the moment of their conception. Changing our species to be better is still a moral good.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 02:21 AM
1

It's just like, you're defending forming harems and shit. Why? What I'm talking about is much more extreme than Venezuela. Do you believe in abortion? Why is killing a fetus okay, but genemodding them to be more optimized not okay?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 01:49 AM
1

You're not evil, but I can't pretend like I don't think tournament selection isn't evil and I do not like it when people defend it, it's gross. That's a different situation and far more nuanced than you're making it out to be. It's also not quite comparable to what I'm saying. You seem to think that the problem is I'm eliminating free will. I'm not. I just want to eliminate obsolete remnants of our evolutionary past, optimize the species, and help people.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 01:38 AM
1

No, it just means you defending tournament selection is now much more evil. You're right, it depends on what they're being compelled to do. What I want is good.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 01:24 AM
1

I didn't realize you were a woman. Either way,what I say stands People can be compelled to do pretty much anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 01:14 AM
1

I don't think it will be utopian, just much better. There will always be problems, but don't let the perfect get in the way of the good.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 01:02 AM
1

Also I should add, that logically we should also reverse the dimorphism of the species, but I'll talk about that more in the next thread
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 12:58 AM
1

I guess it should be I'll make another thread tomorrow I was told I can't make another one today
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 12:55 AM
1

Ah, quite reasonable. In the end, we would establish a grand supercomputer and algorithm that takes the dna and personal profile of a person, and perfectly (as perfect as possible) and pair them. The way dna combination works, is that there IS NO SUCH THING AS "good" genes, just combos. Everyone has a person who's genetic material is a perfect match for offspring. Plus, people are already doing the personality part with dating websites that make you fill out long questionaires, and funnel you go…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 12:42 AM
1

Things will happen, but it's still less pain than tournament strategy and it doesn't mean people can't learn and grow. Tournament selection doesn't necessarily have people to learn and grow, it just bottlenecks evolution based upon an obsolete fisherian runaway preference and it causes problems in relationships. I never said anything about people not being allowed to leave. Leaving a long term monogamous relationship to try to form another long term monogamous relationship is not the same as tou…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 12:29 AM
2

People aren't going to pair bond with people they've never met, that's not how it works. There already are monogamous pair binding people, remember that, they don't bond with celebrity crushes. If those situations happen, people will hurt, then heal, then meet someone new and attempt monogamy with them. It won't take many tries. But, it will end the obsolete practice of tournament selection. I'm sorry about calling you evil, but in the end your system damns many millions of people to loneliness,…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 12:17 AM
2

It would depend on who they bond with. Free will isn't compromised after the transition is made. I care about them, but not over eliminating the obsolete strategy. Brutality does not need to be violent. That large swaths of men and some women are left out of love for no logical reason (as again, we can easily solve this) does not need to exist, it's brutal and obsolete. There are a shitload of animal species you can look at that are monogamous and breed for life, there is no reason to say our un…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 12:05 AM
2

Who said anything about assigning men women? That's a strawman of my position. I understand there would be oppression during the transition, but that is nothing compared to the obsolete brutality of tournament based selection. Whether or not humans are selfless doesn't matter, I'm not trying to end selfishness, I'm trying to end tournament selection. The new monogamous people will be happy being monogamous, and the idea of doing otherwise would be gross to them. This eliminates the pain of tourn…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 11:52 PM
2

Great rebuttal. Typing on my phone makes some mistakes.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 11:11 PM
2

Nope, you don't know how I do with women, nor do you understand how genetics work, nor different reproductive strategies.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 11:09 PM
2

No they don't, they will work to support their families and produce because they like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 11:07 PM
1

I over think everything, so far it's been helpful in my life :)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 10:43 PM
1

I have not
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 10:40 PM
2

These are not dichotomous
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 09:46 PM
2

You're solution, again, involves believing that tournament based selection is the best or the only one. Plus you forget that there is no strong change in evolution of our species not because of monogamous strategies, but because we dominated the environment in general and lost the need to adapt to it, rather we adapt the environment to us. You also assume women make proper decisions (they do not, the fisherian runaway is flawed). You forget that we can create a monogamous species as well as gene…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 09:30 PM
1

Again, this is not how genetics work nor how selection works. You are assuming that 1) there is such a thing as superior genetics (there arent, different things are better in different environments), 2) females are somehow always in tuned with what this "superiority" is (the fisherian runaway does not make "better" genes) and 3) that tournament based selection is the best or even the only one that exists. None of this is true, and all it does is justify an obsolete strategy that causes unneeded …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 09:17 PM
1

No it doesn't
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 08:16 PM
2

Also, female sexuality is relative, not absolute. Even if you reduced the male population to say, 10% of only the "best" men, women would then just only go for the top percent of those men
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 08:01 PM
1

No one would do so if we were a monogamous species, which is the point. Now you have learned
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 07:59 PM
1

What would the solution be that makes it incompatible with becoming a monogamous species? You're just claiming these things are dichotomous for some reason. Cmv not successful
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 07:52 PM
2

So you're just saying "men deserve to suffer". Nope, my solution helps everyone, yours is evil, and there is no such thing as garbage genetics in the way you're thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 07:39 PM
1

You can be monogamous as well as breed for intelligence and such
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 07:36 PM
1

Why does this matter, you're acting like these things are dichotomous
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 07:35 PM
1

No, as we can both redesign the species to be monogamous, as well as deal with the socioeconomic problems caused from that. They are not dichotomous.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 07:20 PM
1

Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 07:13 PM
1

Me, no joke. And the reason is because tournament based systems are not required, nor are they the only strategies that exist, while others are better for all members. If you disagree, then you're just saying that men (and a lot of women) deserve to suffer just for losing this tournament that doesnt even need to exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 07:13 PM
2

Males are not expendable, just less valuable. Either way, don't rub it in.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 06:05 PM
2

This mindset is exactly what's wrong with women
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 04:06 PM
1

This is not the view of radical feminism. You're pretending like 3rd wavers are the only sect.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 03:52 PM
4

This is not possible given the dimorphism of our species. Matriarchal animals always feature larger females.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 03:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter