TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Quipster99 Archive

View 3 posts and 33 comments by Quipster99 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

A large-format multi-material 3D printer could print a structure with conduit for plumbing and electrical integrated into the walls.
/r/MGTOW06/01/17 04:26 AM
1

retire early at the age of 40. Then live a relatively simple life managing investments until I die. Living the dream.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 03:11 PM
2

Hard data is lost on you folks.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 01:59 PM
1

Again, your extremism prevents me from putting any effort into a reply. You're not a bad person, but you need to work on your conversational skills. Perhaps we will cross paths again in the future, and we can have a constructive discussion then, provided you take steps towards eloquence and open mindedness. But likely not as I don't frequently post here (for this very reason). Something about this subject just turns people into absolutists who take an extreme position on things that are very obv…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 02:57 PM
1

You are a very unpleasant person, I have to say. You shouldn't engage others in conversation unless you feel capable of contributing to constructive discourse. Perhaps review reddit's "reddiquette" guidelines to help improve your ability to debate a subject. Also punctuation does wonders for readability.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 02:38 PM
1

I think we're done here. I can't debate your extremism any longer.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 02:30 PM
1

http://imgur.com/XzyNpd4 If she hadn't been so plastered as to have decided to get into the car with these folks, against the wishes of her friends, then she would not have been raped. I'm not saying it's her fault. But I am saying that she shoulders some responsibility for what happened. It's like if a small child gets into a van with someone offering them candy. They are absolutely not at fault for being abducted, but are in a way responsible for not acting in a manner that has been deemed and…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 02:19 PM
1

Don't mistake my meaning. I certainly don't condone what they did, and I absolutely feel there should be extremely harsh punishments for such crimes. But I more urgently advocate that we attempt to address the problem, instead of just the symptoms. I happen to believe that the problem is not a culture that accepts rape as part of every day life, instead that the proven effects of intoxication should warrant more stringent laws, and harsher punishments for those who break them (especially when ki…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 02:09 PM
1

Alcohol impairs judgment. If she bears no responsibility for her mental state, why should they ? I think the root problem here has to do with underage drinking and poor parenting. Not "rape culture". It's a primal urge to procreate. It's no secret that being intoxicated tends to cause those urges to manifest. Why were these kids permitted to be doing what they were doing in the first place ? Sounds more like booze culture to me.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 01:58 PM
1

Uh, well, I actually wasn't in charge of the Stubenville thing, so If you feel it's an example of victim blaming, then you're pointing the finger at the wrong person. Personally, I feel that if someone makes the conscious decision to become intoxicated to the point of losing the ability to make rational choices, then responsibility for the implications of those choices rests solely on the individual. That said, both the males and females involved in Stubenville shared responsibility for what tra…
/r/MensRights17/09/13 01:49 PM
1

I dunno. It bothered me about Stubenville that BOTH involved parties were intoxicated, underage, and unsupervised. A fact which I assume contributed to the decisions that were made in that case. Not victim blaming, just a muddied outcome as a result of poor decisions on the parts of both the youth and their guardians. This kid was at school. I don't see the connection.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 01:29 PM
1

Wait so the little boy in this story was intoxicated to the point of incapacitation ?
/r/MensRights17/09/13 01:21 PM
21

I thought vote brigading was "against the rules" on reddit ? Isn't that why all links to other parts of reddit say np.reddit.com now ? I'm just sayin... If it's not enforced, why abide by it ? Seems to work with traffic laws well enough.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 02:47 PM
1

Except that being topless in public is already legal in BC. According to Kelowna's mayor, anyway.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 03:03 PM
1

Should move move her to the very front the next time there is a riot... After all, she's qualified now, right ?
/r/MensRights26/08/13 12:38 PM
1

Right. I think that's what OP was getting at. It's supremely stupid to paint all males as having privilege comparable to those at the top; those select and fortunate few.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 05:33 PM
1

I'd wager he probably meant people who are afforded the ability to wield resources & effect policy. People with power, not necessarily just money. "The 1%".
/r/MensRights16/08/13 05:24 PM
1

Being part of the class that has access to resources ? I.e, rich.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 05:08 PM
3

He was referring to the in-term... The time when both human and automated vehicles share the roads. I agree, full computerization would be optimal, but the transition period will be lengthy unless implementation of self-driving systems is mandated, which seems unlikely.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 09:25 PM
1

But it's not so black and white. It's not "kill me to save someone else". Maybe it's A) Avoid the bus and hit a wall. 100% chance of all occupants of the bus surviving, 25% chance you survive, or B) Hit the bus. 80% chance of >5 fatalities on the bus. 60% chance you survive. You say it should go with whatever choice produces the best chance of saving the occupant ? Is the car manufacturer responsible for the fatalities caused as a result ? Maybe it is a simple answer. I guess we're going to find…
/r/MensRights12/08/13 08:32 PM
1

Fair enough. The way my Uncle framed it was "With the soon to be widespread deployment of self-driving cars comes a moral dilemma. If a computer controlled car finds itself in a situation where it must choose to either sacrifice the occupants to avoid a bus full of children, or risk injury to the bus of kids in an effort to save the occupants of the car, what should it do ? Who makes the decision ? Who is accountable ? And how is the decision made?" I said that "high value" vehicles should be ou…
/r/MensRights12/08/13 08:04 PM
3

Why ? I don't mean this in any kind of dick-ish way, but it's something I was speaking to a family member about recently. He was asking what made a child's life so much more important that his. While I do agree, basically, with the whole "protect the next generation" thing, I can't deny that he did have a point...
/r/MensRights12/08/13 07:24 PM
2

Fucking epic comment. Fucking epic show...
/r/MensRights19/07/13 04:57 AM
3

http://techcrunch.com/2013/03/21/a-dongle-joke-that-spiraled-way-out-of-control/
/r/MensRights15/07/13 06:24 PM
8

If the joke is about a woman programming term / USB device, it's sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 01:29 PM
1

Don't really see any evidence that it's from a user, but it could be.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:36 AM
2

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:940dBrdwSyEJ:www.clorox.com/cleaning-and-laundry-tips/articles/6-mistakes-new-dads-make/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:28 AM
1

The kicker is that we possess the technology to make it happen, and rather than doing so, are content to squabble over gender, nationality, class, or pretty much whatever the media tells us is a divide. We're all human. Check. We all live on Earth. Check. We all have access to the same pool of knowledge and resources. Check. So, then, we could simply use the resources/knowegde and build a better Earth for all humans. But we can't because: _________ (insert hollow bullshit issue meant to divide a…
/r/MensRights26/06/13 03:57 PM
1

Should have ended that sentence four words early methinks.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 01:12 PM
1

TL:DR from page 30. CCP hired Mintchip, a youtuber and eve-player, for their PR team (for Dust 514). As CCP Mintchip has in the past said negative things about Eve-Online's gaming community - partly in regards to being abused by said community, and I have no doubt misogyny DID play an important part in that - parts of said community are unhappy that she was hired. Some people critique rather minor points - like her being allowed (!) to post in Eve's forums and not only in Dust forums and her kee…
/r/MensRights06/06/13 10:21 PM
2

Found some more info here, along with some further discussion. Lots of hate, but it's good to see some reason being applied too. As someone who just joined Eve on Friday, this has been a bumpy start. Community up in arms, combined with the DDOS attack along with my buddy having all kinds of trouble with payment. This story somewhat piqued my interest tho as I've been reading MR for a week or so and that "nerd cave" analogy reminded me of something I saw on here.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 05:46 PM
23

If anyone is wondering about the nature behind the public outrage, consider for a moment a group of tabletop gamers. They go to the same place, they do the same things, they nerd-out about the things they like to nerd-out about. It is their haven, their refuge where they can engage in and talk about all the nerdy stuff nobody else likes to hear about. Their money supports the nerd-lair, keeps it operating and running smoothly. They put in their ideas about how best to keep it going so their prec…
/r/MensRights06/06/13 04:00 PM
2

What career is that ?
/r/MensRights04/06/13 06:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter