TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

R4_F Archive

View 0 posts and 97 comments by R4_F on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Idiot, you don’t even realise what FGM is. There are four types and variants of FGM. The one I am describing (Type 1A) is entirely analogous with the excision of the male prepuce. The clitoral hood is a simple structure on the other hand while the foreskin has other innervated structures. r/CircumcisedClits If all they were removing was some labia, I’d say “who cares” HAHAHAHAHAHA, so you completely support FGM Type 1A and 4? Holy fuck, the amount of cognitive dissonance needed to make this stat…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 12:46 PM
2

Lmao idiot, that survey is based on the bulbocavernous reflex, there are other physiological studies showing its absence in cut men, which has been proven to be linked to the frenular delta and ridged band. Look up “The Prepuce” by Taylor & Cold et al. You don’t fucking have it. It’s a physiological fact, that survey just reinforces that fact. And that’s really interesting. If the only discrepancy was knowing the term or not, the responses between the two would be parallel. They are not. And tha…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 12:41 PM
2

When did I say I was intact? Are you illiterate? I just said I know what you are missing. No, genitally mutilated children aren’t normal. And I feel sorry for your brother but neither is he, he is a fringed case. No person with a normal penis deals with this. This is like if my uncle had to amputate his arm and I suggest doing it to my son because clearly an intact arm causes “problems”. UTIs are 10 times more common in not cut men Also, no, that is not even remotely true. The risks for UTIs bet…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 12:40 PM
2

Depends on the person. But no, the median age of retraction for the foreskin is 10.5 years old. You are not supposed to retract it at that age, at least typically. 40%~ of American pediatricians apply forced retractions to toddlers, which scars the foreskin and may result in phimosis down the line. Your brother was most likely subject to this if he was able to fully retract it at that age. And, even if pee did get in there, it does not matter. You are acting as if this is some unheard of and imp…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 05:41 AM
2

Lmao this cope. Yes, I know more about your penis than you do. Because I know what you are missing and you don’t. “Same nerves as the palm of your hand”. Yes, Meissner corpuscles. The foreskin also has more nerve innervation than the glans, which have free-nerve endings that are mostly receptive to pressure, pain, and heat. Pressure, and heat is what mostly results in pleasure regarding the glans by the way, fine-touch stimuli is only a small factor in the glans. The stretch receptors within the…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 05:31 AM
3

“Why not circumcise your daughter’s labia and clitoral hood? Are you just going to wait until it gets infected? Just because there are antibiotics? Just cut it off! How barbaric” Lol, lmao. Also, circumcision does not reduce UTIs. It’s pseudoscience. UTIs have more to do with the urethra than what’s under the foreskin. Even the stupid remarks from the AAP claim this. It’s in the name, urinary tract infection. What you are thinking of is balanitis, which is a fringe case and is again, easily trea…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 05:27 AM
2

Brian J Morris Like clockwork. His sources are junk, and so are his “findings” inflated. Look at other sources. Even his peer-reviewing is done through pay-to-publish publishers. He also assumes every muslim or country without statistical findings has a rate of 99%, that is statistically disingenuous. Also, yes. I know more about your penis than you do. Histological evidence is concrete, your glans aren’t supposed to feel like outer skin, or feel dry. This is how all mucous structures act in per…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 05:27 AM
5

I want it to be federal. Make it illegal, and social change will follow. Just like FGM is illegal. No one deserves to have their bodily integrity violated. That expired statement is still (incorrectly and misleadingly) used by WebMD and MayoClinic. And is still cited by other medical institutions in the USA.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 03:50 AM
9

That AAP statement is expired. They no longer have an active stance on the issue. This was due to the joint cosigned paper against the AAP’s statements written by varying European medical institutions and associations in 2012. And if you look deeper into the statement. They only claim “benefits outweigh the risks” because of social benefits as well. They themselves acknowledge that the benefits against infection is negligible at best. The research is already here. And the AAP’s statements are ou…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 03:42 AM
7

You are forgetting about MGM. I don’t take these arguments about bodily autonomy to heart when people ignore the fact that boys have their bodily autonomy and integrity violated starting from birth. r/intactivism
/r/MensRights12/05/22 03:32 AM
56

100 or so infants die from circumcision in the USA per year. It’s not uncommon. You are crushing a lot of veins there. Babies are fragile. And so are children
/r/MensRights12/05/22 03:27 AM
2

Also, no, that’s not how anything works. The reason it’s tight in the first place is to prevent anything from getting under there. Your whole premise is flawed.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 03:18 AM
2

It does. The foreskin has the highest abundance of nerve endings on the penis. Especially the inner mucous membranes and the frenular junctions. Look at any histological mapping of the prepuce. Why are you lying? Fucking hell, even if we are going about this informally, there are sex toys sold specifically for the “f-spot”. There are edging guides specifically for the ridged band. You are mutilated. You will never feel the same sensations as normal men.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 03:17 AM
2

And it does not prevent anything. It’s a bronze age ritual. It exposes and dries out the mucous membranes, ablates almost all stretch receptors leaving the only possible stimulus to be friction, and it scars the nearby area. Infections are cured with antibiotics and medicine. Women get more UTIs than men, and we do not cut them. Do you genuinely think this is comparable to vaccination? How far into denial are you? Why do you want to protect the image of your penis so badly? It’s not a choice whe…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 03:13 AM
2

It’s not 40% lmao, I don’t know where you got those statistics from but they are very inflated. There are 4+~ billion men in this world, 1.1 billion are mutilated. Do the math. You also have to take into consideration that more countries in general do not practice MGM. Only the USA, Middle East, North Africa, and South East Asia practice it. Everywhere else is green. Also, that is not an argument. According to studies done in 2015, 85% of FGM victims are fine with their mutilation, I guess the c…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 03:06 AM
3

toughens the head skin It doesn’t toughen skin. It keratinises the mucous membranes. Those HIV studies in Africa have been shown to be methodologically flawed solely by the fact that the cohorts weren’t treated the same, the circumcised cohort had a recovery period where they couldn’t have sex, and they were provided condoms and sex ed unlike the latter cohort. This also reflects on the fact that HIV rates have been rising in Africa ever since the VMMC. Also, no, keratinised mucosa is more prone…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 12:01 AM
3

Circumcision is not the norm. 70% of the world does not cut genitals
/r/MensRights11/05/22 11:55 PM
2

Weird how 70% of the world doesn’t have this hypothetical problem.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 11:48 PM
2

Your argument falls apart the moment you consider the other types of FGM, such as pin pricking which has little to no long lasting damage on the vulva. And no, that’s not how religious freedom works. One’s freedom ends where another one’s starts, you do not have the right to practice your religion on someone else. This is basic bodily autonomy 101. This is regardless of damages Also, regardless of this, are you implying MGM isn’t harm?
/r/MensRights11/05/22 04:12 PM
7

He won’t, I don’t think he can read 💀
/r/MensRights11/05/22 04:50 AM
9

This is what you comment after ignoring all the scientific evidence? 💀
/r/MensRights11/05/22 04:33 AM
4

Something is wrong with me to think butchering the genitals of innocent children is bad? 70% of the world thinks the same as me Nope, it’s all about women though apparently, according to you. Seriously? What sub do you think you are in?
/r/MensRights11/05/22 02:37 AM
3

Oh, so you saw it with your own eyes when his glans started to resemble a crimson open wound? No, his penis isn’t fine. It is scarred, and will keratinise/dry over the rest of his life. Lmao I seriously wonder how you can double down on this when you see the concrete anatomical evidence of what happens when you cut an organ. How do you call yourself a parent when you see the results of what you did to him?
/r/MensRights11/05/22 02:35 AM
5

What? I don’t care about pleasing women, I just want my entire penis, is that too hard to understand? I mean, I guess it’d be hard to go back on your backwards logic since you mutilated your son
/r/MensRights11/05/22 02:34 AM
4

Because circumcision is genital mutilation. It is against the human rights of bodily autonomy and integrity. It is not “optional” for the children. Fighting against that is a part of Men’s Rights movement. Good job on mutilating your son. I wonder if he went through nervous shock while they ripped the adhesions from the glans and crushed it with a clamp.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 02:31 AM
5

Why do you think everything’s about women? Are you dense or illiterate? Read what he is saying. No one is talking about issues in bed. Men are entitled to their whole genitalia and the sensations/pleasure that comes with it. You will never experience pleasure or sensations that normal men take for granted. This is not about pleasing women.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 02:23 AM
5

Lmao, stop pretending for a minute and actually think about what you are reading. Almost all circumcisions cut off parts of the frenulum and ridged band. Can you orgasm through your ridged band?
/r/MensRights10/05/22 11:52 PM
7

https://www.academia.edu/25577623/A_preliminary_poll_82_of_circumcised_men_ignore_serial_anejaculatory_mini_orgasms_the_male_minis_91_of_the_intact_enjoy_them_updated_02_16_2022_ Do you have “mini orgasms” in intercourse? Do you think “orgasms” are just the feeling of relief and release? (spoiler, it’s not supposed to be) Chances are, you don’t. Especially if you are missing chunks of your frenulum
/r/MensRights10/05/22 11:49 PM
5

It’s not hypothetical when it is a histological fact. What you feel as “sensitivity” and pleasure is a fraction of what a normal penis feels. You are missing literal structures of tissue
/r/MensRights10/05/22 11:31 PM
1

No, we have not.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 11:29 PM
1

The argument is both. You are arguing the same thing about FGM, you said it’s about harm and not choice, I shifted it around to show you that it applies in both arguments.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 11:29 PM
10

First off, it’s not just a little skin. It makes up more than half of the nerves in the penis and it is largely made up of smooth muscle and mucosa than “skin”. It also prevents your mucous membranes and glans from keratinising (your head probably feels like “skin”, and not like the inside of your mouth) Second, it has no health benefits. And no, it isn’t “easier to clean”. It takes less than half a second to pull it back in the shower. Like holy shit, 70% of the world doesn’t cut, do you think …
/r/MensRights10/05/22 01:37 PM
16

Is it really unthinkable to think that I don’t want parts of my penis cut off?
/r/MensRights10/05/22 12:19 PM
3

Are you dense? They aren’t cutting themselves, they are cutting their children. It’s generational trauma. Just like how your father chose to cut your genitals.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 08:35 AM
4

HAHAHAHAHAHHA You got shat on and got refuted so hard you are coping by copy-pasting this single comment. If you are going to argue, read what you are linking first. You have a very warped view about what “science” even is.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 08:25 AM
5

Lmao what? 70% of the world doesn’t cut genitals. Only American surveys say women “prefer” scarred and immobile penises.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 08:20 AM
29

This just emphasises the point. According to this poll. (And any poll about this to be honest, just go on r/polls) 50/100 cut men say they don’t like it, rest say they do. 99/100 of intact men say they like being intact, rest say they do not. Therefore the cut men saying they “like it” must be coping on an incomprehensible level. They only like it because they were robbed of the choice. If this weren’t the case, the stats between the intact and cut demographics would be parallel.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 06:49 AM
30

Don’t cut him, I say this because you are in the US where male genital cutting is common. Teach him bodily autonomy by respecting his. For other things, teach him to recognise and process his emotions. When he is frustrated, ask him what emotions he is feeling. “Are you feeling angry? Are you feeling sad?” etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/22 06:51 PM
3

No, we do our own research. You just ignore them because it doesn’t fit your narrative. I can’t count the amount of times you’ve been replied to with insurmountable evidence, and you never replied, now why’s that? Obviously African polls and cohorts are more reliable than concrete anatomical evidence.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 05:05 PM
2

“Objective”? You are the one ignoring anatomy in favour of polls and anecdotal evidence. You’ve literally ignored every single histological mapping that was linked to you
/r/MensRights05/05/22 05:03 PM
3

I don’t see any histology there. All I see is flawed methodology of small cohorts. Try again, and answer the question already. Is the frenulum not erogenous according to you? How about the mucous junctions and ridged band?
/r/MensRights05/05/22 05:01 PM
3

That says nothing about sensitivity or the histology of the foreskin. If you are going to argue against basic anatomy, at least use relevant sources. Do you genuinely believe the frenulum, ridged band, mucous membranes etc are not erogenous? That they are unfeeling? You are too deep into denial. Also, that wikipedia article has basically been at war since 2006 because of “circumsexual” editors and their bias.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 03:53 PM
2

Lmao, I hope looking at the diagrams you were sent doesn’t hurt your ego. Wouldn’t want to inflict FOMO on our unfortunate forced-retraction phimosis victim. Nice wall of text btw, really reinforces the point that you have no idea what you are talking about
/r/MensRights05/05/22 07:10 AM
2

Bro that diagram is just basic anatomy, it applies to virtually every penis on earth, except those that were mutilated When will you stop pretending?
/r/MensRights05/05/22 06:01 AM
2

Why the hell would I believe some random LARP from someone that doesn’t even know his own anatomy? Do you even know what a frenulum is? “Men don’t derive pleasure from foreskin” lmao Your whole comment reeks of bullshit, and reads like some cut guy that thinks foreskin as some unfeeling excess. You even brought up the “hygiene”/“cheese dick” and “girls like it” argument LMAO Literally no intact dude talks like this, at least get better material before baiting
/r/MensRights05/05/22 05:54 AM
2

Lol if you think local anaesthetic is enough to numb the inflammation and pain when they cut fucking smooth muscle and mucosa.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 02:13 AM
5

Lol no they don’t. Simple histology debunks your methodologically flawed and disingenuous studies Claiming sensitivity isn’t lost is claiming the foreskin is unfeeling, and that neither the frenulum or ridged band are erogenous. Do you genuinely believe this? lol
/r/MensRights05/05/22 02:03 AM
2

75% of the world is intact. Have you ever heard them express discomfort? The answer is no
/r/MensRights05/05/22 02:02 AM
3

You literally said an erogenous body part is unfeeling. There is a whole section of edging guides on foreskin. You never were intact
/r/MensRights05/05/22 01:50 AM
4

men don’t derive pleasure from foreskin You never were intact. Why are you lying?
/r/MensRights04/05/22 07:07 PM
6

And you don’t think butchering a penis and ridding it off erogenous structures harms the male baby?
/r/MensRights04/05/22 07:06 PM
4

And you’re confusing legality with morality. Slavery was also legal once, would you argue that it is ethical?
/r/MensRights04/05/22 07:05 PM
7

Lol you act like mutilating the genitals of your children is something you didn’t inflict, like it’s something that just happened. How can you even compare it to those insignificant things?
/r/MensRights04/05/22 12:38 AM
10

Lmao it is done in assembly line fashion, at least in certain hospitals. You’re also clearly dodging the tissue industry behind this. A single excised prepuce costs up to $400. It is very profitable, whether you like it or not Stop ducking your head under the sand to protect your mistakes as a parent If it bothers doctors that much, they wouldn’t ask until an unaware parent said yes.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 06:32 PM
14

“The grapes are probably sour! I don’t need them anyway.” The fox said, dismissing his loss. I don’t think you understand preputial anatomy. The foreskin provides quality and control over quantity of sensitivity, this is apparent in the stretch-receptors found in the frenulum and ridged band, as well as the subsequent mucous junctions. You most likely think pleasure comes from friction and “rubbing” with lube. Lmao
/r/MensRights03/05/22 06:24 PM
14

You aren’t neutral. You’ve been defending MGM this whole thread. Grow some balls and admit that you want to butcher infants.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 06:10 PM
11

Without permission? That “consent” form includes it. Your poor 4 boys’ genitals have been used for “anti-aging” facial creams made for 50 year old women. Also, yes, it does happen. Parents get asked 12 times on average in America. You just gave in to mutilating your children the first time so they didn’t pester you with their solicitation. You can just buy neonatal fibroblasts for $300 a piece. It’s not even hidden. It’s an entire industry. Funny how you are supposedly in medicine, but don’t eve…
/r/MensRights03/05/22 06:02 PM
11

It pays so low that there is an entire industry about it selling neonatal fibroblasts. Doctors do want to do it. Parents in America on average get asked 12 times, 12 times on average. That is solicitation.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 05:23 PM
11

Lmao now you somehow practice medicine. You pro-GM people never cease to make me laugh Also, that’s very unscientific of you, somehow statistics don’t match your bias and anecdotes, therefore they must not be real. Hilarious. Weren’t you also the guy that ignored all the literature refuting you and your “health benefit” claims? You also were pretending like the frenulum wasn’t erogenous, that it was unfeeling. lmao
/r/MensRights03/05/22 05:19 PM
14

There is? Have you missed the news reports that get posted around here about infants dying off “botched” circumcisions? Even the article about it listed it as a complication due to “anesthesia”.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 05:18 PM
72

It’s almost Kafkaesque how this thing is normalised. Like mutilating a child is the same as checking his health or doing skin-to-skin, some mere routine standard. They pretend like they aren’t supposed to have their entire penis, that some of it is defective and that it needs to be amputated without question. It’s so fucking sickening. Apparently in an American hospital, parents get asked 12 times on average, 12 times. This is soliciting for unaware parents. Doctors need to have the same attitud…
/r/MensRights03/05/22 05:06 PM
4

And I didn’t want it. I am upset about it. Where was my choice, my rights? Do I not own my own body? Do I not deserve bodily autonomy? It is not the parents’ choice. It is a harmful and damaging ritual that does nothing for the child. It started to cripple sexuality, and it continues to do so It is as big of a deal as FGM. You are clueless because of your bias and willful ignorance
/r/MensRights27/04/22 01:28 PM
4

R.N. Marilyn Milos discusses that the "nerve endings in the ridged band are the accelerator that allow the man to ride the wave to orgasm. When they're cut off the man is left with an off/on switch instead of an accelerator. Men who say they couldn't stand more sensation don't understand that the nerve endings in the ridged band give quality not quantity" There are also these studies; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21672947/ https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1464-4…
/r/MensRights27/04/22 06:11 AM
8

Not really. The frenular delta and ridged band regulate the ejaculation reflex, which is cut off in circumcision. Circumcised penises are reportedly more in risk of premature ejaculation as a result. Intact penises are able to ride along with the pleasure and have more "control" due to this. Also, which "adults" have you talked to about this? Most people report having decreased sensation from 40% to as high as 80%. Can you reach orgasm by rubbing your ridged band?
/r/MensRights27/04/22 05:49 AM
9

I tend to get agitated when someone supports arguments for genital cutting
/r/MensRights27/04/22 05:12 AM
10

The foreskin is a part of the penis, and it is the most sensitive erogenous structure on it. Removing it thereby harms the penis, you have literal scar tissue to prove it. Your mucous membranes have dried up. You are missing either chunks or the entirety of your frenulum. You are missing the ridged band. You are missing reflexological tissue. And last of all, your penis is immobile. It doesn’t have the gliding mechanism that prevents friction in intercourse and masturbation. And depending on how…
/r/MensRights27/04/22 04:50 AM
5

You have the right to do it to yourself, but you cannot force it upon others. Bodily autonomy is a human right
/r/MensRights27/04/22 04:47 AM
9

Lmao, of course those that support child abuse are shunned regardless of if they were “civil” or “polite”. Your entire viewset is fucked, what do you expect? I cannot comprehend for the life of me why anyone would support genital cutting
/r/MensRights27/04/22 04:46 AM
3

Most anti-circ people are cut themselves. Why do you think they are intact? I am cut as well by the way.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 04:45 AM
4

Then do it to yourself. Don’t subject that injury to others
/r/MensRights27/04/22 04:44 AM
6

A circumcised penis lacks several functions an intact penis has. A vagina/vulva without a clitoris can still urinate and get pregnant, is that not mutilation then?
/r/MensRights27/04/22 04:43 AM
5

And did the infant consent?
/r/MensRights27/04/22 04:42 AM
3

That skin is the most sensitive part of the penis. It is as “extra” as the rest of your penis
/r/MensRights27/04/22 04:42 AM
5

Mutilation is the damaging or alteration of an organ. Removing erogenous tissue is mutilation
/r/MensRights27/04/22 04:41 AM
12

I was mutilated under Islam. Go fuck yourself
/r/MensRights27/04/22 04:40 AM
6

And I didn’t want it. Where were my rights? Do I not deserve autonomy?
/r/MensRights27/04/22 04:39 AM
10

Lmao. Imagine failing to cope about this shit that you loop back around to it being “cleaner”. You are never going to feel the sensations 70% of the world takes for granted. Most anti-circ people are cut themselves, that includes me
/r/MensRights27/04/22 04:35 AM
10

What the fuck does that mean? What if I don't like those "minimal" changes? What choice do I have then?
/r/MensRights17/03/22 12:40 AM
3

Search up Puritanism.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 10:08 PM
4

It’s from a Danish study. One which I’ll have to find. And it’s not high at all either. Also what domains? What are you talking about? Claiming that everyone here is a fucking bot to further your narrative that “no one is mad about being cut lol” is absolutely absurd and pathetic.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 09:50 PM
3

Jews and Muslims do it for religious reasons as well. But the intention is the same, “weaken the organ” and reduce pleasure. You can read the excerpts from Maimonides from the 12th century if you want to know the religious aspect. America doesn’t do it for religious reasons.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 09:46 PM
4

Tradition. It started in America in the 1890s to prevent masturbation and reduce pleasure. 70% of the world does not circumcise www.cirp.org/pages/anat
/r/MensRights02/03/22 09:16 PM
6

Lmao sure, maybe if you call everyone a bot it will invalidate everything. “No true scotsman” fallacy According to statistics, 1 in 5 men are unhappy about being cut. That is a lot of people. Is that also fake?
/r/MensRights02/03/22 09:07 PM
3

Cut dicks are not “normal”.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 09:06 PM
7

Bro what? Do you think the foreskin is just some unfeeling sheet of skin? Majority of the nerves are there
/r/MensRights02/03/22 09:06 PM
4

Restoration does not restore anything. You will not get back the erogenous structures that were cut.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 02:02 AM
6

And it’s frankly absurd to even like it. Yes, men are prone to like how their dick looks like/is. But “preferring” a damaged and scarred body part is incomprehensible to me. No one, while knowing the facts about it, could ever come to the conclusion of “preferring it”. It’s akin to those nutjobs and weird women in r/CircumcisedClits It also normalises genital cutting.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 08:02 PM
15

People that are ok with being cut are most likely to subject it to their sons.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 07:56 PM
7

It’s not currently reversible. “Restoration” doesn’t actually restore anything. r/Foregen is on the horizon though
/r/MensRights01/03/22 07:56 PM
2

True, your dried glans and scar are merits to this
/r/MensRights01/03/22 07:55 PM
8

They don’t do the same things. www.cirp.org/pages/anat
/r/MensRights01/03/22 07:54 PM
13

Why do you want a partial penis? Why do you want to feel less? Why do you want a scar on your genitals? Why do you prefer having a dry glans? It’s baffling to me that anyone would want to be cut. It’s self-harm.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 07:54 PM
9

Like most of men’s issues and human rights violations, yes. It won’t stop us from condemning it and advocating as an activist against it
/r/MensRights01/03/22 07:52 PM
8

Disgusting. If mutilating genitals is a part of “your culture” then you need to re-evaluate what the fuck you’re doing with your life. Sounds like a textbook case of cope to be honest. I don’t blame you, it’s easier to be in denial than face up to the truth, especially as a man.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 07:51 PM
2

Medicine and regenerative medicine especially doesn’t grow on trees. They are considering payment plans if people aren’t legible, as health insurance might not cover it due to the controversy around the topic. Again, if you do not have enough information to comment then don’t comment in the first place. ECM scaffolding is taking decellularized tissue and integrating it by using your body’s own healing mechanisms. Nerves, vasculature, etc are all expected to fully regenerate. This has been done o…
/r/MensRights14/01/22 02:00 AM
2

They are using ECM scaffolding to regenerate it, they’re not just grafting a skin tube. They’re regenerating every nerve ending. I don’t understand why people are commenting under here as if you actually know what regenerative techniques they are using
/r/MensRights13/01/22 01:13 PM
1

The glans get dekeratinised after coverage. All feeling is expected to come back
/r/MensRights12/01/22 11:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter