TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RNLImThalassophobic Archive

View 0 posts and 8 comments by RNLImThalassophobic on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-3

Never seen a mra been misogynist Have you literally never been in any of the comment sections in this sub then? Here's an example of one referring to women as "wombs". https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1iyl4nx/being_a_man_was_too_much_hard_work_so_i_became_a/mevqh72/ This entire sub has changed from when it began and it's now 99% weird sexist rants and woman-hate rather than any kind of reasoned discussion of men's issues.
/r/MensRights26/02/25 05:08 PM
-14

I think of it as a case of calling out shitty behaviour if we see it. For example, I met my gf's godson for the first time, he's... 13ish I think? 11-13 for sure. Anyway, we were up in his room playing Fifa and he fouled me but it didn't get called. I jokingly complained and he said: "You know why the referee didn't give that free kick? It's because (chuckles) she's a woman." My very first instinct was to just blank that - he's not my kid, I've never met him before, it would be awkward to call h…
/r/MensRights25/05/24 07:31 AM
-6

The idea was to demonstrably give women the power over who could contact them by allowing only women to message first. What? AFAIK the idea was to give women the obligation to message first, taking away the power to just sit back and let men stress about the opening message. As you said, women (and also men) have the power to choose who can contact them on every dating app simply by not swiping right on anyone they don't want contacting them lol.
/r/MensRights30/04/24 06:32 PM
3

In the UK I believe the burden of proof shifts i.e. the burden is initially on the complainant to show that a 'defamatory' comment has been made (could be as simple as "here's a headline from the defendant's newspaper saying I'm a soviet spy"). Then, the defendant's usual defence will be that headline was true, and the burden of proof then falls on the defendant to prove that it was true. So the claimant doesn't have to prove they aren't a soviet spy (it's basically impossible to prove a negativ…
/r/MensRights24/05/21 09:58 AM
24

No I think they meant the bit about if a woman claims sexism at work she will have the support not just of friends but of society as a whole, but that kind of support isn't given to the guy in this situation. I'm not saying I personally believe that's 100% accurate - just that I don't think they meant what you said in your own words.
/r/MensRights24/05/21 07:35 AM
23

Obviously this depends on jurisdiction but I'd imagine you would have to prove it was true. Without something in writing or a recording of the interview you're unlikely to be able to defend the claim
/r/MensRights24/05/21 07:33 AM
5

Not what I said at all, I simply pointed out the actual point of OPs post and the comment above yours because your logic in saying a statement can't be accurate and also misleading was poor
/r/MensRights04/05/21 06:52 PM
7

Are you being deliberately obtuse? "Misleading" doesn't mean "untrue". OPs complaint is that the article's headline refers to the women's struggle with no mention of the fact that men are facing a greater struggle. It's like similar headlines of "1/4 suicides are women", entirely missing the point that 3/4 of suicides are men. A statement can be 100% accurate and still be misleading. Say for example you'd found a car door unlocked and stolen a laptop from it. Later you're bejng questioned by the…
/r/MensRights04/05/21 05:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter