TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RPB1 Archive

View 4 posts and 186 comments by RPB1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Agreed. I never make absolute statements about a girl's appearance. I always frame it as "I like (x)." If I like the feel of her skin, I'll touch her and ask her if that's how she always is. All that other shit I think is cringeworthy. Direct compliments serve no purpose.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/16 02:57 AM
2

I never stop talking to girls this way. It's my default mode. I talk to every woman like this, though the ones I'm attracted to get more sexual phrasing. If it doesn't feel natural to you, practice on cashier girls. When they give you your change/coffee/whatever, look them dead in the eye and say thank you (insert affectionate word here). As a rule of thumb, "babe" and "baby" is reserved for girls you're already at least acquainted with. Sweetie/sweetness/cuteness/etc. You want to adjust the sex…
/r/TheRedPill02/06/16 02:18 AM
1

I gotcha; I misunderstood, and you're absolutely right. I thought I was done with TRP a long time ago, but I realize that it helps me stay the course and stay on point. Not to mention that this is the only place we can talk candidly about the way shit actually is.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/16 12:49 AM
1

Lol. Then why are you here? You missed the part where a same day lay seamlessly happened with minimal effort after nearly a year of a depressive dry spell. And if you've been paying attention, similar FRs on here get written off as fabrications because apparently sex is so difficult for a guy who isn't narcissistic as fuck or advanced into TRP.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/16 11:08 PM
2

All of the above. Sex was great, but I also feel a sense of accomplishment in terms of being what and who I choose to be through discipline and consistency. The sex was an emergent property of all that, and to know that WHO I AM can have what I want after so much pain is deeply cathartic. That said, she is fucking hot as hell compared to some of my prior same day lays.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/16 06:48 PM
2

Use whatever vernacular comes naturally to you. Babe/baby, sweetie/sweetheart, darling, etc. I use them in a downward inflection, and always after saying "thank you". Also if a girl is really hot, I don't say "You're so hot." I say: "I like your look" or I bring up something specific while touching whatever I'm expressing a fondness for.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/16 06:32 PM
1

It should be standard, but a lot of people on here get incredulous because of where they started. What I'm trying to establish is that no matter how shitty things seem, and no matter how far in the dumps you are in terms of motivation and emotion, a night like this can happen to anyone who gets the fundamentals right. Anyone can turn their shit around when they enter the right headspace.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/16 05:43 PM
2

Definitely dude! Pretty fucking pleased with myself right now. Funny how much shit can change in one night when you get out of your own way.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/16 03:55 AM
2

I appreciate it bro, and I nearly lost it at the beautiful ass comment. I can't rule out that I had it in the bag like you said, though all that other shit I did couldn't hurt. Fist bump on dem genetics.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/16 03:53 AM
3

Thanks for the props. Hells yeah on the cuddling. Nothing like a soft, warm body draped over you.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/16 03:47 AM
12

Life is stranger than fiction. If I told you about my memorial day weekend, where you just let go and have fun, you'd think I was reciting a script from a movie somewhere. When you let go and go with the flow while remaining unattached to the outcome, amazing things can happen. The way my night turned out, I couldn't have choreographed it better. Accidently on purpose as it were.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/16 06:28 PM
1

The fact that he was motivated enough to chase after the guy and escalate the situation shows a 'wish-a-nigga-would' mentality. His ethics may have been sincere however he tried to play out a heroic fantasy and paid the price.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/16 12:01 AM
1

Simba, being brave doesn't mean you go looking for trouble.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/16 02:04 PM
10

This came at just the right time. I've been doing this with my overbearing toxic narcissist of a father (who has a good heart though it's subverted by his innumerable character defects), but didnt have the awareness to articulate what I was doing. This happened right over the New Year's where I had to assert myself and remove myself from the situation, and at times I felt bad and doubted whether or not I was being a pain-in-ass youngster or if he had in fact crossed the line (after some introspe…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/16 10:12 PM
136

I find it hilarious how she can't even say the words: an actual apology for cheating. Instead she wordsmiths it away as 'regretting what happened between us'. That look of regret was all about her envying your success as well as your date; none of it came from her realizing how much of a shitty person she was. To think you'd even want to have anything to do with her shows how deluded and disconnected from reality she (along with women in general) is.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/16 07:59 PM
4

Way to miss the point dude. Stoicism is not the absence of emotions or emotional thoughts, it is refusing to act upon those thoughts. Does thinking about killing someone make you a murderer? The act precedes the label or put in other words: "You aren't it until you DO it." To suggest that having a 'petty thought' cross his mind isn't "alpha/RP" shows how little you understand the concept. According to your reasoning, a supplicating mangina (Beta by our standards) who secretly thinks "alpha thoug…
/r/TheRedPill22/12/15 10:42 PM
6

A powerful man evokes a different response when he goes down on a woman than a guy trying to show off his Lick-Her License. While he's a fictional character, Frank Underwood eats Zoe out while maintaining his dominance. I prefer to do so in a similar fashion. Besides, some pussies just look too damn delectable not to devour once in a while.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/15 04:54 PM
53

This is the most important feedback you'll find here OP; heed his advice. What chick pulled is grounds for permanent banishment from your life, forever. She blew up your phone in order to disrespect you and attack your character when you didn't give into her demands and upheld the rules you specified on day one. When that didn't work, she tried to hurt you any way she could smearing your name to people with zero involvement. That is not only blatant disrespect, but fucking bathshit. Hard next. L…
/r/TheRedPill28/10/15 10:35 PM
9

You serious bro? So steroids are cool but serotonin isn't? Neurochemicals are integral to the human experience. We talk about hormone optimization on TRP regularly, the most popular subject being testosterone. I read OP in its entirety and it was a valuable contribution. Frankly I think your attitude over a cursory example of MDMA is in poor taste, and discouraging real knowledge from being disseminated flies in the face of what TRP is supposed to be.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 03:24 PM
1

You chose to blow up my inbox with your disrespectful hostility, throwing a name calling tantrum like you have something to prove, and possess the ironic audacity to try and flip the word 'petulant' on me. Wow. You embarrass yourself. The other guy may have been a smartass, but you most certainly have a chip on your shoulder. I have no more time for such juvenile dick swinging. Good day.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/15 03:25 PM
0

While the Turing test has been around for decades, the 'AIs' are disembodied and have limited avenues of expression. The second you gave it a fembot body and a voice to go with it, the uncanny valley effect would kick in unless you made it almost perfect. The current prediction is that sexbots will be ubiquitous in 50 years, which according to Moore's Law our computation technology will be countless orders of magnitude greater. Enough so that a truly human-like android is possible. Again, you cr…
/r/TheRedPill17/09/15 03:45 PM
0

The issue is not necessarily a limitation of technology or immersion, but a limitation of government controls. I doubt Uncle Sam wants men manufacturing their own armies by modifying highly sophisticated sex toys into killers. That's the rub.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/15 01:58 PM
0

Your logic makes no sense. My argument isn't that the nuclear bomb won't work, my argument is that the nuclear bomb won't be sold at Circuit City. Uncle Sam privileges and all that. Read point #2.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/15 01:57 PM
0

As much as you may have enjoyed expounding upon your understanding of mechanical devices, I'm referring to automated digital devices of increasing complexity. Perhaps I gave a poor example, but that wasn't the salient point. You didn't comprehend my entire reply. The risk of injury is secondary the militaristic potential of walking fembots which the establishment would never hand out to common folk.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/15 01:56 PM
0

Being pedantic doesn't contribute much to the discussion. Technically, all computers "learn" when you write data to them. But I'm not talking about simple information retention and pattern recognition. Our current AI cannot make decisions the way humans can (which is why our drones are still controlled by people). To make an artificially sentient lifeform (one clever enough to act like a robot wifey), it's going to take a lot more shit. A fembot can't clean a house if she can't register what a h…
/r/TheRedPill17/09/15 01:45 PM
-1

Hate to be that guy, but sexbots aren't going to happen. The more advanced and lifelike you make it, the more points of failure there are. If you design a sexbot with the ability to make its pussy tighter or massage your dick while you're fucking it, then you also risk it crushing your dick in the event of a glitch. Whose gonna bug test that? Sure you could do manual tightening, but there will be guys out there who want to push the envelope and make it more automated (which means more moving par…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/15 11:20 PM
3

I find it interesting that while you argue one cannot extrapolate the character of one woman to the entire gender, you have just extrapolated the attitude of one user to the whole of TRP. This is why you need to read the sidebar, rather than use the ramblings of one idiot to soothe your cognitive dissonance and disregard the sum total wisdom and experience of tens of thousands of men with the same story as yourself who have come here to compare notes and connect the dots. If your prevailing atti…
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 03:06 PM
3

Total crock of shit. That refrain is typical of someone who lacks the self control and strength of character to ditch the junk. Different foods take different metabolic pathways and trigger different hormones, the healthfulness of those foods notwithstanding. Go read 7 Principles of Fat Burning to get you started, as even a cursory understanding of endocrinology will make it obvious that what you eat is just important as how much if not more so. Energy expenditure is but one pillar of bulking; g…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/15 11:37 AM
1

If she wasn't crazy (threatening suicide), I would say that if she's willing to come with you abroad, then that speaks volumes about her ride-or-die ability. But she's not willing to enter your frame. You're dodging a bullet; women like that only get worse once they've got your baby or your wallet.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/15 01:26 AM
2

This. Anyone who uses psychotic threats like that in order to control you shouldn't be the mother of your child. Ever.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/15 01:18 AM
17

How on earth could you skip breakfast while lifting? That is starvation. Ever heard of Intermittent Fasting or Fasted Training? Athletes who adhere to Ramadan were doing it before it was cool (in the form of Leangains). Nah dude, it takes something like 72 hours of a severe caloric deficit (along with carb deprivation and consistently low Leptin to downregulate metabolism) before you enter muscle catabolism. "Breakfast" (the noun not the verb) is a thing pushed by food/supplement companies and p…
/r/TheRedPill05/08/15 12:10 AM
2

You are hamstering and aren't seeing the forest for the trees. A person assaulted you. And instead of doing the logical and common sense thing, you keep making excuses for someone who was willing to ruin your life and have you sent behind bars on a whim. Here's an extreme example to illustrate the stupidity of your stance, which is not RP at all: Somebody breaks into your house and comes at you with a knife. But because you know BJJ, you are able to disarm and subdue them. Even though you have p…
/r/TheRedPill18/07/15 02:08 PM
3

TRP is not about "helping other men", it's about improving yourself as a men Really dude? This sub and its shared knowledge doesn't exist in a vacuum. The application of TRP is self improvement, but the point of its existence is to help other men. Otherwise nobody would come here and we'd all keep our experiences and insights to ourselves. Secondly, OPs attitude is not RP. Elements of his behavior were RP, but he made excuses for her conduct and hamstered it away. That pattern of thinking leads …
/r/TheRedPill18/07/15 12:21 PM
55

I'm not willing to fuck up her life over a one time thing. This is a stupid stance to take; she certainly was willing to fuck up yours. You are hamstering her conduct and you messed up several times, starting with when you invited her into your home. If you are not perceptive enough to recognize your poor judgment of both her character and your decisions, then I question your decision making altogether. She probably did exhibit red flags or "tics" beforehand but you simply rationalized them away…
/r/TheRedPill18/07/15 06:31 AM
4

You must be a woman. Women frequently take issue with any scenario where a man discovers her infidelity through any method that doesn't involve them admitting it of their own accord, citing privacy rhetoric regardless of context. Either that or you're a man with a very bluepill view of the world. Either way, we're done here.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/15 12:46 AM
4

At no point did she take issue with nor did she protest him using the key. Privacy wasn't the issue. I repeat: think before you hamster.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 10:11 PM
6

If you are entrusted with a spare key, it's generally assumed you can let yourself in. Think before you hamster.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 07:16 PM
2

The sort of women willing to be spun are seldom new to that sort of thing, thus increasing one's exposure to venereal infections. A lot of guys who swallowed the pill weren't getting any (or at least not as often or with whom they wanted), and they went from one extreme to the other. It's the equivalent of a sexual chip on their shoulder where all pussy that can be fucked, must be fucked. Rampant promiscuity always carries great risk in many forms, and a lot of these boys are out to prove someth…
/r/TheRedPill08/07/15 01:38 PM
7

Vance was mentioned because he was present in the scene I described to establish context. At no point were there any moral assessments or defenses as to his character in any capacity. If you understood what Alpha actually means, you would recognize that they are separate from the nobility of the behaviors therein. Vance was Alpha Bux because he takes what he wants with no fucks given and was affluent. Hence: Alpha Bux. As for your erroneous judgement of Beta-hood: he divulged the identity of Hit…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/15 03:07 AM
9

At what point did I vouch for a piss-poor caricature of Alpha Bux? Dat dere reading comprehension broski. You should try it before attempting to derail a discussion with a half-assed AMOG reply.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/15 01:35 AM
61

Well put. It certainly lends credence to the notion that feminists are the real misogynists and project it onto the objects of their envy and desire, while simultaneously trying to claim our intrinsic attributes (noble or otherwise) for themselves.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/15 12:32 AM
26

No. The manner in which she came at me was disrespectul. I will not concede to a CC riding hypocrite. She was just comforting herself with BP rhetoric because Chad won't commit, but I responded calmly and rationally. What they believe is irrelevant, the product of their actions speaks for itself. And committing murder no questions asked just because a set of ovaries shares DNA with you? That's plain idiotic. So if your sister [falsely] accused her ex of raping her, you'd get yourself locked up b…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/15 12:19 AM
3

Even though you dun goofed from where I'm standing, your post still had value for me in the sense that I too recently found myself thinking about my old oneitus and came up with all sorts of bullshit to tempt myself into offering the olive branch. I believed it on an emotional level (I loved this woman in a way that I won't be able to again), but my self-control won in the end. For me, I'd feel disgusted with myself as though I'd betrayed my principles and now that someone else has given into a …
/r/TheRedPill01/07/15 02:45 AM
1

Which makes it my fault for LTR'ing her, but diminishes my responsibility as it's logically much easier to be deceived by a master. You realize that women use this same line of thinking to justify cheating, one night stands, and false rape accusations do you not? Dude, I mean this sincerely: you need to stop with the mental gymnastics. This is hamstering 101 if I ever saw it.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/15 02:26 AM
1

There was certainly nothing rational about what you did, as NC fixes oneitus long term. The Red Pill is a rational approach to objective reality with regard to relationships and self-improvement; nothing more nothing less. Betas "do things their way" all the time, so I think you're hamstering hard. My interpretation is that you were feeling sentimental in your 'old age', and while there's nothing RP about breaking NC with a oneitus, you did what you had to do even though I personally think you t…
/r/TheRedPill01/07/15 02:21 AM
1

So you're saying don't go assaulting women. Well no shit. What is this, amateur hour? You spoke of reading comprehension earlier, and since an important theme in this discussion is context, allow me to shed some light on a subtle but important distinction. What this entire conversation has been about is the act of playfighting. Playfighting by definition is a word describing a situation where people are sparring/wrestling in a friendly context. The consensual and non-hostile context is establish…
/r/TheRedPill27/06/15 01:22 AM
3

Just talked to one of my fellow dojo members about this. "Would you find it hot if a new BF tried to wrestle with you when he finds out you're into martial arts? ...she not only said no-" You should learn proper sentence structure and how to establish context, because based on your own phrasing it clearly suggests that you were the one asking the quoted question. No need to get defensive, I'm trying to learn ya not burn ya. And if a woman gets angry and faceplanted the guy down for trying to pla…
/r/TheRedPill26/06/15 09:13 PM
13

Lol because asking a post-menopausal woman what makes her tingle is a very reliable methodology. /s Playfighting has been around since before the days of yore when it was called roughhousing, and guys have been doing it since kindergarden. It's just another form of flirting. If you're a total aspie at kino within context, then yeah you probably don't want to try. Otherwise, da fuck you on about mate?
/r/TheRedPill26/06/15 08:19 PM
3

Are we even having the same conversation? That video is two men fighting each other where the black guy underestimated his opponent and got pinned by the white knight. You haven't proved anything, you are simply arguing a separate point from the one I made. If you're arguing because you want to champion the virtues of BJJ, take it elsewhere because it is irrelevant to the concept I'm actually addressing.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/15 05:01 PM
2

I don't understand what you are trying to argue. I've been very clear on my point. The notion that (in a controlled setting) a smaller opponent with superior training and experience will defeat a larger opponent with psychological scruples and inferior skill is a truism. Take that stuff out into the streets (where this shit actually matters) against a resolute man that knows his shit, and you will get very different results.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/15 04:54 PM
8

Not sure what you're trying to prove (or why) given that Marine isn't trying to kill her; he's trying to tap her out in a controlled setting without hurting her. And his being a marine speaks nothing of his psychological limitations versus a woman. Apparently you didn't properly comprehend my initial reply. I'm not arguing theory; I've been out in the shit where there are real stakes if you lose. As far as BJJ gyms go: been there, done that. I repeat: women win because men are holding back (or a…
/r/TheRedPill26/06/15 04:40 PM
9

None of that means shit against a guy that knows what he's doing. Weight classes exist for a reason. I've been in the arena with female martial artists that have one or more black belts (a meaningless distinction if you ask me). Technique only goes so far. It's good against the uninitiated, but only a tie-breaker against someone on your level. A well trained woman with good strength can take down a skinny-fat dude if she finishes it quickly, but that's mostly due to surprise and conscious (or su…
/r/TheRedPill26/06/15 02:42 PM
22

Don't try to avoid the pain and heartbreak. Accept that it's going to suck and charge headfirst into it. The mind has a funny way of bracing for impact when it knows a storm is coming. It comes in waves. You will miss her. You will miss the sex. You will miss all the sweet little things she did. You will be pissed. You will cry. You will second guess yourself. You might hamster yourself into believing she can be "saved" or that if you had just done X she wouldn't have strayed. You might fantasiz…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/15 02:41 AM
5

How do you know? Because I'm the goddamn Batman.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/15 08:49 PM
4

All it takes is one angry beta with a weapon's permit to end your philandering. No amount of hubristic naivety will inoculate you from the consequences of your actions. Everybody gets checked eventually; you aren't Batman. Diabolical geniuses aren't prattling on TRP I promise you that. Hedonistic indulgence is reckless foolishness by its very nature. You may not possess the frame of reference to understand that, but you will. The point of TRP is to understand animal urges and control them to you…
/r/TheRedPill19/06/15 08:16 PM
0

Your concern is irrelevant, for you have failed to address the big picture (the macrocosm directly affects the microcosm). You can do what you want, but understand that you're more likely to get your ass kicked or injured with that level of reckless foolishness. If you're willing to die for pussy, then that's your prerogative. Enjoy that cop-out logic.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/15 07:37 PM
3

Territorial instincts are a real thing, as is cuckoldry. To deny the physical and emotional consequences of adultery is juvenile stupidity. A man should know better. Most people conflate dogma, ethics and legality with morality. It can be argued that "morals" are universally common rules designed to prevent people from triggering undeniable primal human revulsions because of their power. Penal consequences notwithstanding, there are lines that when crossed are likely to result in violence, so "m…
/r/TheRedPill19/06/15 07:29 PM
2

This. They don't like to be cheated on with another woman, but they loathe being cheated on with a man.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/15 03:03 PM
2

While my OP is about lesbians and not gay men, I've observed that there are gay dudes out there who wouldn't go near a pussy with a rented dick that their buddy paid for. And then there's others. (NSFW) From what I've seen the hyper-promiscuous ones are more opportunistic even though they have a primary preference for men. I've also seen weird cases where lesbians and gay men hook up for the lulz. They won't get into a relationship with women though, even if they're willing to fuck one.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/15 01:56 AM
2

Higher testosterone exposure in utero resulting in a masculine form and behaviors, with higher estrogen resulting in feminine forms and behaviors is common knowledge. You may understand that there's no consensus, but too much is being gleaned from so little. Making the leap from hormone levels to a human female being born with a neurologically hardwired attraction to women is a premature extrapolation. I can't be arsed to pull it up now, but I saw a study that showed in cultures where food and l…
/r/TheRedPill17/06/15 06:00 PM
8

Settle down buddy. I never said that lesbians walk around secretly thinking about dick (though you'd be surprised how many do). I am saying that in the right scenario with the right guy with the right game, they will give into tingles because they aren't born that way. There is zero evidence for any genetic precursors for female homosexual behavior, only behavioral and hormonal studies that settle nothing. Go ahead and Google Fu up a study proving it. I'll wait. Nothing but philosophical bickeri…
/r/TheRedPill17/06/15 03:59 AM
4

Yeah, because women are so different from each other. /s You've obviously got skin in this game, or you wouldn't have gone ad hominem. We're done here.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/15 03:14 AM
-1

I honestly haven't put a whole lot of thought into how it works in men since I'm not trying to fuck them.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/15 02:57 AM
2

My assertion is based on a lifetime of repeatable success sleeping with every kind of lesbian you can think of in different cities, not a ONS in a bar. You aren't paying attention. This is why I said you should read the original. Whether or not others hate this sub for what we discuss is irrelevant. Believe what you want dude.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/15 02:53 AM
7

Clearly I struck a nerve. I didn't say male homosexuality or homosexual behavior isn't a thing, I said lesbians aren't a thing in that human women are not hardwired to be exclusively attracted to women. A subtle but vital distinction. AWALT, even lesbians. I recommend you read the original; this is what I've lived. I don't care for politically correct rhetoric or wikipedia pages, I'm simply passing along my experiences. Take it or leave it.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/15 01:58 AM
0

This is complete and utter fiction. Hamsters don't work that way. For a more detailed explanation of my incredulity, see my reply to IllimitableMan's comment.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/15 07:41 PM
18

I'm going to throw my lot in with the incredulous crowd and call bullshit. There's a major eyebrow raiser in what I suspect is a revenge-rejection fantasy or a troll-tale for the purpose of other subs to mock. While opportunities like this do happen, I think the guys upvoting this want it to be true because they want this to happen to them. First there's this: she asked me for my phone number...but I give it to her anyway figuring there's no problem. Okay so he gave her his number, and as we all…
/r/TheRedPill16/06/15 07:36 PM
22

If all you could see is the desert, you'd think water and life is rare. Take the planet as a whole and it's absolutely covered with water and lifeforms, including countless thousands of varieties of avian, marine, and land-based life. And that's just carbon based life-forms. There are also lifeforms we didn't identify as life until recently because they operate on completely different principles (extremophiles) and we didn't possess the instrumentation to detect or reach them. This universe is f…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/15 11:14 PM
1

for the most part obesity is caused by not eating enough. Technically. The problem isn't that people these days aren't necessarily eating enough (they eat plenty in terms of calories and raw volume), the problem is that the nutritionally devoid garbage they eat barely qualifies as food. The body doesn't treat 100 calories of Captain Crunch the same as 100 calories of broccoli, and most people have a rudimentary understanding of nourishment and think it's merely "calories in vs calories out". It …
/r/TheRedPill15/06/15 02:57 PM
2

I beg to differ. That's unsubstantiated speculation at best. Even if you could objectively prove that Royal Jelly for example harms your kidneys, which is non-toxic to humans, that argument makes no sense coming from you when just yesterday you were saying "Fuck safety" while referencing The Real. 'Holistic' (a charged word) techniques by their very nature trigger the body's own mechanisms in order to achieve a desired effect rather than artificially forcing it beyond the physiological "safeties…
/r/TheRedPill14/06/15 06:15 PM
8

Indeed. Let's face the music: GLO is building up his clientele and fanbase. In order to maintain his status for the blind hero worshippers, he needs to deliver results quickly with as little work as possible. Get people to like you, give em a taste of something sweet and they'll take your word (in this case, books) as gospel. Pushing silver bullets for the uninitiated. Given the rate at which steroids 'work', it would build his credibility and he can go "See? I told ya it would work! Now buy my …
/r/TheRedPill14/06/15 03:13 PM
8

I disagree with your assertion. It's too cryptic and generic. So? I've no inclination to qualify my assertion nor do I need to. The effects of steroids are thoroughly covered in scientific and anecdotal literature. As I said before: to each their own. Are there medically valid reasons for taking steroids? Absolutely. But most men who take steroids aren't doing it because of a defect, they're typically young bucks who want to overexert their bodies for the wrong reasons at the expense of their na…
/r/TheRedPill14/06/15 05:01 AM
2

I suspect it's a combination of lifestyle choices made during the LTR, stress, visual cues and pheromones that contribute to it. For example a crying woman tends to reduce testosterone. Perhaps it's nature's way of ensuring our protective instincts work properly. If women weren't capable of dropping our T levels (and all the corresponding behaviors linked to high T), we'd behave very differently as a gender toward women (and children for that matter) if they weren't able to take some of the stea…
/r/TheRedPill14/06/15 01:51 AM
2

Ejaculation doesn't lower serum T levels, but it does sharply reduce the androgen receptors that control your sensitivity to testosterone. If you abstain from ejaculation, on the 7th day your testosterone levels spike before returning to normal. There's literature on this so go check it out. But if you're getting laid on the regular, abstaining from ejaculation not only takes tantric levels of self control but in my experience women get offended if you don't cum.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/15 01:24 AM
13

I wouldn't throw caution to the wind if I were you. There's a difference between calculated risk and hubristic recklessness. To each their own, but unless you're a competitive bodybuilder then cutting corners with steroids are for the short-sighted. Unsightly side effects like growth hormone gut notwithstanding (among other things), sticking a needle in your ass is akin to taking out a student loan for a liberal arts degree; it's idiotic and you're going to lose more in the end than you're going…
/r/TheRedPill14/06/15 12:14 AM
6

Unless I am mistaken, TRP is a place to discuss self-improvement and women in the context of both sexual and big-picture societal strategy. It is not a place to air your butthurt about being banned from another RPers website because he didn't like your film review. While the manosphere may be against censorship in principle, in practice its adherents (and moderators) have a "put shit where it belongs" approach. People get banned from this sub all the time for sharing opinions that don't jive wit…
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 05:59 PM
3

"Too much maturity"? That almost sounds like it was written by a woman. You are hamstering, plain and simple. That is pure blue pill rhetoric. You should know better. You'll find out what happens to boys who think they know better than the Red Pill. Willful stupidity is still stupidity. No amount of physical attraction is an excuse to backpedal and throw caution to wind over a pretty face and a hot body. That is juvenile recklessness. Clearly you can't handle beautiful women and will make every …
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 02:48 PM
32

So her claim to fame is that she's hot? Given the emphasis you gave on her looks without any mention of her nurturing skills or girl game, you are absolutely thinking with your dick and rationalizing it with blue pill romanticism. You want to spend the rest of your life with this woman and do something as stupid as marry her over beauty that is guaranteed to fade. You are coming at this the wrong way for the wrong reasons. Enjoy it while you can because you're going to fuck this up.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 05:16 AM
3

I can't help but suspect that with all the positive and direct attention that Karen is getting from TRP (despite being low SMV by our standards), that there will be a contingent of hamsters suddenly "getting it" and looking for their piece of the action. Karen is the only female pundit (who interacts with us) I'm aware of whose input TRP gives any kind of shit about, and I don't see that going over too well with hamsters at large. I saw a thread addressing this over at MGTOW, and it's a fair ass…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 02:38 PM
2

Not sure if serious or creating another caricature for TBP to point at. There's a difference between being RP and a hyperbolic elitist. You openly admit to saying extreme things on the internet for shock value, which simply makes you a troll. Why do you even have time for such trivialities? As for your admission of hating women, I hope for your sake that you're just in the anger phase. With regard to the rest: it doesn't matter what your buddy says. If you don't want to date, then don't. But eng…
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 09:39 PM
21

Their being into crystals doesn't make them more of a slut than anyone else; they're no different than regular women. These new-agey girls simply use their 'spirituality' to rationalize uninhibited polyamory. If they fuck you over they'll spew some psuedo-spiritual hamstering as to why the 'universe has led them to a new person'. They're just normal girls who use their 'enlightenment' to sanction being a slut and avert guilt because everything is meant to be™. Crystals aren't a red flag, just a …
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 09:17 PM
1

Nice try bro. Glyphosate-based herbicides are toxic and endocrine disruptors in human cell lines Glyphosate-based herbicides are the most widely used across the world; they are commercialized in different formulations. Their residues are frequent pollutants in the environment. In addition, these herbicides are spread on most eaten transgenic plants, modified to tolerate high levels of these compounds in their cells. Up to 400 ppm of their residues are accepted in some feed. We exposed human live…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 05:53 PM
1

I said "tends to". We're dealing in probabilities, not absolutes. Calm your opinionated titties and read.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 05:39 PM
1

Way to miss the point there bro. You're arguing the virtues of organic vs non organic when my response is very specific: organic beef is grass fed. Ergo, buying organic beef will result in the desired nutritional profile. You can sit there arguing in circles looking for an uncommon brand of non-organic grass fed beef, or you can do the smart thing and just buy whatever meat is grass fed, which will likely be organic.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 05:34 PM
1

One: I didn't mention GMOs even once. Just because something is non-organic doesn't necessarily make it GMO. Straw man. Two: Perform your due diligence on Glyphosate and then get back to me.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 05:28 PM
1

Organic beef tends to be grass fed while non-organic is almost always grain fed.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 05:19 PM
1

Non-organic foods and meats contain more endocrine disrupting compounds. The animals are also fed a diet of grains instead of a natural diet of nutrient rich grass (which worsens the nutrition profile in the meat). This is almost common knowledge by now. Many factory farms also keep their animals in small spaces where they are more prone to small cuts that get infected, requiring the use of anti-biotics which get passed on to the consumer and reduces your gut flora population. Even upon visual i…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 05:14 PM
0

TRP sees the plight of men and seeks to achieve some equilibrium by returning to what works and nurturing the Alpha in all of us. MRA sees the plight of men and seeks to achieve equilibrium by asking women to forgo their legal advantage so they can be even bigger Betas. One sees women for what they are, the other idealizes them. One knows that if others will not give, you must earn and take. The other is still asking permission, and then bitching when the answer is no. We look at what we can do …
/r/TheRedPill01/05/15 10:00 PM
18

This isn't surprising to me after seeing how Julien bitched out. It doesn't take a lot of balls to pontificate on the web. It's easy to hold frame on your self-produced website geared toward like-minded men. Unfortunately for Julien and now Roosh, their frame is weak when put in front of the American viewer. While there are many men on the manosphere who are naturally RP but needed to fill in some cracks, we'd be remiss to forget that a lot of these "top RP thinkers" were socially awkward pussie…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 05:36 PM
11

Been there; done that. Since you compared Adderall to NZT I should remind you: in Limitless they crashed hard once they stopped taking it. Taking it every day is excessive. Sniper shots, not scorched earth.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 12:16 AM
2

While that's a given, I'm not simply referring to women in sexual relationships; familial and platonic relationships are included in that generalization.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/15 10:40 AM
8

I think it depends on how many 'favor points' she has accumulated. Women will conveniently forget or fail to notice what a man does as though it's par for the course. But you can bet your ass she will remember every single thing she's ever done no matter how trivial. If she can portray herself as the more selfless woman, she wins all the Victim Chips. Women will certainly throw each other under the bus, but not if they look bad doing so in the eyes of the group. Men on the other hand? They only …
/r/TheRedPill21/04/15 08:16 PM
7

While I tend to agree, I have observed that women are far more likely to retain gratitude for other women while dismissing the significance of an identical gesture from a male. If a woman does something, she is acclaimed for it. When a man does something, big whoop. He only gets a superficial thank-you if he starts feeling like he's being taken advantage of. That's been my experience anyway.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/15 08:00 PM
50

It's difficult to experience sincere gratitude when you think you're entitled to everything men have to offer.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/15 07:34 PM
108

If there's one reality most men experience, it's an ungrateful bitch.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/15 04:12 PM
6

Acting like an aspie won't get you far in life unless you already have power, wealth or both. You don't have to care if anyone likes you, but you do need people to like you.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/15 06:55 PM
1

If you know that she's RP aware, then she's shown you her hand. This puts you in an advantageous position but also a precarious one. If she knows about TRP, then she likely has some degree of awareness on what real men do and don't like. As such, she can modify her behavior to make herself look like a Unicorn (which don't exist). Tread carefully my dude. Men are suckers for hot, submissive, and seemingly thoughtful women. Don't let your guard down, and never give her the idea that you know anyth…
/r/askTRP17/04/15 08:32 PM
2

Being in the moment doesn't mean being an idiot. Countless men spend too much time in their head trying to figure out what to say and how to say it. Once you are in state and acting naturally, it just comes out. It should become as effortless as breathing. Be mindful, but analysis paralysis is a real thing.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/15 04:25 PM
2

Comparing coercive methods employed by religious groups is hardly the same thing as a lesbian letting her guard down and submitting to the tingles. If you took anything away from my report, it should be that female sexuality is not binary, and that having sex with lesbians is far easier than you think. It's fun if you play your cards right. I've had my dick in too many of them to take any rhetoric to the contrary seriously, and the experience of others matches my own observations. I tend to trus…
/r/TheRedPill13/04/15 04:18 PM
10

Covert power tends to trump overt power. Remember the old adage "the nail that sticks out gets hammered down"? An organized movement (which can be banned, corrupted, destroyed or outlawed) is an inefficient use of energy versus a sea change in the minds of men who are unplugging.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/15 02:06 AM
8

Won in which sense? They've influenced society to their benefit and have passed most of the legislation they've lobbied for. I never said they were happy with it, in fact I suggested the opposite. There is everything to be gained from understanding culture, women, feminism, and TRP. If you understand something thoroughly, then there is no need to beat a dead horse. Once you've mastered Geometry and Algebra, it's time to move on to Trig. There's no later stage of swallowing the pill that stops yo…
/r/TheRedPill12/04/15 01:36 AM
10

I get you, but you're making a classic error: expecting abstract thoughtfulness from a woman. If you want a meaningful conversation with an intelligent human being, you're better off talking to an introspective/contemplative man. Loosen up and learn how to banter bro, not every conversation has to be philosophical discourse. The sooner you figure out that women are generally boring, short sighted and predictable, the easier it will be dealing with them.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 11:28 PM
1

The burden falls to the next man to vet her properly before getting into a relationship, not for the OP to conceal his reasons for breaking up with her. The next dude is not his concern. Let the bitch take the hit to her ego; she's not going to alter her behavior in any positive fashion to begin with. Better than OP gritting his teeth in frustration of what he wished he'd said when he had the chance.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/15 03:38 PM
2

Insecurity...I do not think it means what you think it means young one. What you're saying is that the desire to be with a beautiful, devoted and virtuous woman with a work ethic, charm, integrity, loyalty, self-control, and the ability to pair bond (lower N count) is male insecurity. Wishful thinking perhaps, but far from insecurity. That argument is what blue pillers say whenever you hold women to any kind of standard (while simultaneously holding yourself to a higher standard).
/r/TheRedPill09/04/15 03:27 PM
3

So in order to get girls to tell the truth, we shouldn't hold them accountable when our trust has been broken? Right. Maybe they shouldn't act like such shitty people instead of waiting for us to let it slide. And for the record: she didn't tell the truth of her own accord, she did it while she was tripping balls on hospital drugs.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/15 02:57 PM
8

Indeed. I would argue that when you're younger and being indoctrinated, it's the fault of your authority figures since you don't know any better and must adhere to whatever you are taught. But once you are of age, that shit is on you. Just because your momma decorated the house doesn't mean you can't repaint it or move out altogether.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/15 12:12 AM
0

E is cut with other compounds/narcotics and processed to sustain solid pill form. MDMA/Molly is the pure, "active ingredient" in E that comes in crystallized/powder form. I've tried both.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/15 01:07 PM
-1

Dude, read the rest of the thread. You're having a completely separate argument with yourself. My response is specifically addressing the notion that Beta Game is as good or superior to Alpha game in the pre-wall SMP as suggested in the OP. This is what I mean by Sidebar or GTFO. The whole point of Alpha Game is that it is a superior tool to Beta Game, which is best kept as supplementary game for LTRs and marriages. Seems like people just want to argue for the sake of arguing because I take issu…
/r/TheRedPill05/04/15 12:44 AM
0

I've read both. This is exactly what I mean by lack of nuanced thinking which necessitates my keeping shit real simple. You obviously didn't comprehend the last three paragraphs of my previous reply. It is a context sensitive strategy. I'm very particular in my wording; to draw additional conclusions based on absolutist thinking is your flaw, not mine. When you're new, you should be learning by the numbers before you try to improvise. Until you have mastered and internalized the basic principles…
/r/TheRedPill05/04/15 12:12 AM
-4

I'm abrasive and arrogant when presented with nonsense. What of it? I've no need to 'fish'. If you get emotional or hostile, I'm going to point it out if for no other than to illustrate the lack of logic being employed by those who cannot provide a rational response. My thoughtful and nuanced arguments are reserved for those capable of grasping them. If my tone trips someone up, then they aren't ready for me. It's not my fault their frame is weak. I don't insult indiscriminately, I imply deficie…
/r/TheRedPill05/04/15 12:05 AM
0

You didn't read my post before you responded. Everything you said was just addressed. Pay attention dude.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/15 11:10 PM
-2

You're serious aren't you? This statement alone proves you do not understand red pill...Women who are attracted to alphas are indirectly looking for a meal ticket at a primal level. Think about the role a successful hunter plays in a primitive society. Obviously primal urges serve as the catalyst for all sexual interaction, this is nothing groundbreaking. There's a reason women ignore men who display provider behaviors versus those who display aggressive behaviors. And with the provider men they…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/15 11:04 PM
-3

Sure, but that's a separate tangent that is beyond the scope of the OP. I didn't say that LTRs were a bad thing, I said they were risky to the degree that delving into one is an exercise in futility if all you want is sex. But OP isn't talking about beta behavior in the context of a relationship, he's arguing its effectiveness versus alpha behavior for hookups/plating. Had he been talking about LTRs, his OP would've been even more idiotic because a basic tenet of TRP is that you do not commit to…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/15 10:13 PM
-8

Lol if you say so buddy. You didn't read any of my comments with any semblance of nuance, you just wanted to take a crack at me. I must have struck a nerve considering the knee-jerk construction of your response. Before you rage about how wrong you think someone is, provide a cogent rebuttal while you're at it.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/15 10:02 PM
1

Is a RP-beta going to get laid as much as a RP-alpha? Hell no. And that's the bottom line. A Pinto isn't going to drive as fast or as well as a Jaguar XKR, so why the fuck would I use it in a street race? Beta Game (comfort building behaviors) is only useful for maintaining monogamous relationships, and even then you're playing with an ACME dynamite kit.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/15 08:35 PM
-1

OP is correct in saying that sometimes women DO want a "good beta fuck," (though, admittedly, they almost always prefer a "good alpha fuck"). Sex God Method already covers this in reference to variety. It's not a 'good Beta fuck', it's called holding back Pound Town for a night. There's still an element of aggression and dominance, which is by definition, Alpha behavior. the people who are disagreeing with you have not taken the time to fully grok what you are saying. So the only way to disagree…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/15 08:33 PM
24

Advocating for beta game? I'm going to call this one out as a shill. The level of hamstering in your rhetoric is almost laughable. And, no, not post-wall ugly chicks. You contradict yourself with the following: There are plenty of...sexy cougars, who want a good beta fuck. A 'sexy cougar' is a post-wall chick. The only difference is that they are clinging to what little SMV they have left in order to lock a chump down. Women are constantly swinging back and forth between what kind of man they're…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/15 05:58 PM
6

Probably a woman pretending to be a man. They all argue the same and think they're being clever. It's possible that dude is that delusional; either way it's not worth arguing with further.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/15 04:14 PM
6

Is that really the best you can do? If you actually have a pair of testicles between your legs, you haven't experienced much. If you honestly think that TRP subscribers are the only people who have had the experiences that brought us here to compare notes, then you haven't been paying attention. Bad form buddy. And you can also fuck off with your accusation of me white knighting. You mad bro? If you're shooting flak I must be over the target. Thanks for demonstrating you're operating from emotio…
/r/TheRedPill03/04/15 04:12 PM
9

Do you feel you can account for the everyday experience of most men? You said 'feel' rather than 'think', which already shows that you are operating from the level of emotion rather than logic. We don't have to account for the experience of most men, they do it for us and we for them. TRP wouldn't exist if there wasn't a clear pattern to intergender dynamics. There are enough people who don't fit neatly into your viewpoint here that it is not a valuable measure for your daily life. The exception…
/r/TheRedPill03/04/15 02:46 PM
2

A woman being pregnant is not work. Inconvenient yes, but calling it "work" is a stretch. They don't have to understand anything about splicing DNA or forming polypeptides (things men discovered by the way); biology does everything for them. Their only task is to over-eat, be taken care of, and stay the hell out of nature's way. Modern medicine and our environmental conditions have made any associated risks all but negligible except for a handful of women with very specific health problems. And …
/r/TheRedPill01/04/15 05:48 PM
1

You type purty, but the hamster is strong with you. You speak of cognitive dissonance and a false dichotomy and yet you seem to think that the only alternative to your version of generosity is being a dick, as evidenced here: Are you suggesting that in order to be alpha you have to be mean to other people? If this is the case we have a fundamentally different idea of what it means to be alpha. If this is what you are suggesting I would go so far as to say this isn't alpha at all, this is being a…
/r/TheRedPill28/03/15 07:37 PM
1

You're missing the point. Did you read your own OP? Greene's last sentence is a the central dilemma here between doing kind things for others out of respect vs. reverence. When you do something nice (for women, since we are talking about women here) you have to ask yourself: Why are you doing it? If you are doing something because you want her to like you, if you are doing something because you are putting her on this pedestal stop right there. You are doing nice things for the wrong reason and …
/r/TheRedPill28/03/15 12:30 AM
3

You're on the wrong sub. TRP is not about becoming a more attractive man, it merely encompasses such. Higher SMV is an emergent property of becoming the best version of yourself and thus maximizing your options in all areas of life. I don't need to turn a no into a yes, I'll simply associate with those who will say yes. I'll get what I want one way or the other; I have no use for people who deny me what I want while extracting what they're after. You would do well to digest the sidebar, or subsc…
/r/TheRedPill27/03/15 10:24 PM
7

While many of us may like to be generous as a default state, to do so is a one-way ticket to chumphood. I might feel good fucking everything that moves raw dog, but to do so would be stupid. The pre-frontal cortex is there for a reason. Generosity is its own reward, however benevolence without temperance is simple foolishness and naïveté. People aren't stupid; if they see that they can elicit a generous response by displaying certain behaviors, then you go from manipulator to the manipulated. Th…
/r/TheRedPill27/03/15 09:41 PM
2

You are wasting your time. This guy has the blue pill shoved so far up his ass that he's trying to argue that TRP and "true feminism" are the same thing. Check his post history, ignoring the evidence contained within the sidebar is his modus operandi. His angle is obvious; nothing we haven't seen a thousand times over. Just another irrational shill trying to infiltrate and co-opt our message because he can't refute our arguments against feminism with facts when challenged.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 09:23 PM
1

So your argument is that feminism isn't feminism, ergo feminism is a noble ally of men because your friends say so. No True Scotsman. Therefore all arguments levied against you based on facts, statistics, and innumerable anecdotes are invalid because any time serious scrutiny is directed at you, you get to just throw your arms in the air and proclaim: "It's not really us! It's those other guys!" Typical. All you do is dance around any argument you can't refute rationally. You answer facts with f…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 08:03 PM
2

It's what we call "the anger phase". It will pass.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 06:41 PM
2

I'm afraid your attempt at a rebuttal is all fluff and filler, with nothing substantive supporting it. If a person punches you in the face while telling everyone they only want hugs, then they're full of shit and trying to appease their critics. Invoking the No True Scotsman and the old Motte & Bailey is not an argument, nor will it get you far around these parts. Drawing a parallel between eugenicists and Nazi's also doesn't work in your favor. That logic essentially says that all rectangles ar…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 06:21 PM
1

Care to explain your analogy then? I'm not in the habit of spoon feeding that which is self-evident. But if you're really that unclear about it, I was illustrating the defect in OP's logic. His argument was that women are only A if you feel that Y is true. And that if you feel Z instead then women are B. My argument is that A is an objective constant regardless of Y or Z and that there is no B. His argument was based on illusion and delusion according to his ideal of what women can be (a blue pi…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 02:46 PM
2

You are arguing a point I never made while completely missing the point of my analogy at the same time; you haven't come close to refuting what I actually said. You just want to quibble, and you're out of your depth. Who said anything about judging them? By being aware of their behavior patterns which are in direct opposition to the best interests of men, we adapt our associations and behavior accordingly to maximize our sexual prowess and bettering ourselves with as little risk as possible. Wom…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 04:23 AM
4

Even if that were true, all betas should be drowning in pussy given all the effort they put into the objects of their orbit according to that logic. This is the problem with allowing idealism and rhetoric to dictate your worldview: it's not nuanced enough. Having principles and convictions are fine, but they should be grounded in pragmatism and realism. To do otherwise is wishful thinking, ergo blue pill.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 02:43 AM
3

It paints women as creatures who are out to get men Spoiler alert: they are. Or perhaps you'd like to hamster our family court laws along with the plethora of evidence sitting right in the sidebar as well as the real world? You get what you put out Hmm, then I suppose every 6 year old girl that gets molested by her funny uncle attracted that situation to themselves because of the vibe they were 'putting out'. Your logic is atrocious. Think before you type your new age nonsense.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 01:44 AM
5

Yeah, because TRP is all about sex and has absolutely nothing to do with the plight of males in a gynocentric society or how to transcend those obstacles. If you wanna play the two-wrongs-make-a-right card then everything is relative and amoral, therefore it makes even more sense to swallow the pill and capitalize on your advantage in a dog-eat-dog society. Sidebar; try it sometime.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 01:27 AM
9

So essentially what you're saying is that despite the mountain of facts and evidence which serve as the foundation for our perspective, the Red Pill is only valid because we deliberately feel it is? Then I guess jumping off bridges isn't really dangerous, we just choose to see it that way. Are you out of your damn mind? These blue pill/feminist shills are working overtime to co-opt us these days aren't they? Had you actually read the sidebar or gathered some real-world experience before creating…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 01:20 AM
4

Nice try. That logic works both ways, hence the creation of the sidebar. The difference is that our observations are based on reality. The aforementioned shaming tactics predate TRP and are regurgitated in nearly identical form across many different contexts. The shaming glossary isn't merely a compendium of what TRP critics say, but a pattern that mediocre minds resort to when they cannot offer a rational rebuttal. Your argument is nothing but mere rhetoric. Here we deal in facts, observable be…
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 10:32 PM
2

The fact that there is a glossary demonstrates that people like you aren't original or critical thinkers.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 09:39 PM
2

Wow, you're serious aren't you? Feminism is a-okay, they're just doing it wrong? Talk about mental gymnastics. You offer nothing but rhetoric. Tell that to the innumerable men who get fucked over and their lives destroyed on a daily basis at the hands of women; tell them that their plight was all just a big misunderstanding. Go ahead, I double dog dare you. By their fruits you will know them. It doesn't matter what nonsense they use to justify their existence, in practice we know what they're ac…
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 07:46 PM
2

This is a common hamster argument used by every piece of shit ideological group in an effort to repair its image. The facts don't support you. "Equal" doesn't mean the same thing to men that it does to feminists. What part of 'ignore what they say, pay attention to what they do' hasn't gotten through to you? Read the sidebar.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 07:46 PM
13

OP is not for them, it's for the newbies coming here who could use a little context.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 02:49 PM
577

Maybe we are bigots, maybe we hate women. Maybe we aren't, and maybe we don't. It's entirely superfluous to the point of why we're here. Attacking these points does not dismiss our existence, nor does it address it. "We're not here because we're free. We're here because we're not free. There is no escaping reason; no denying purpose. Because as we both know, without purpose, we would not exist." We are here because of feminism. We're here to take from them what they tried to take from us: purpos…
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 02:41 PM
2

The government is not responsible for civilization dude. We had roads and schools long before the income tax and other federal overreaches. Speaking of roads, the state of our 'modern' infrastructure is abysmal and at least 30 years old in most places. Take a look at what the government actually spends its money on and where it comes from, then come back and talk about "free healthcare". Law enforcement? Bro, the only Constitutionally recognized arm of law enforcement is the Sheriff's office. Ev…
/r/TheRedPill19/03/15 09:01 PM
2

As /u/cover20 so eloquently put: now women no longer have any power over you. I'm going to take that a step further. Aside from putting women on a pedestal, the past jitters and feelings of 'satisfaction' appear because getting the girl feels more like a lottery win than a direct consequence of your actions. In the present you didn't win the lottery, you won at Poker. Beta you 'got lucky', which raised the value of women (and the associated emotional payoff) because you were waiting to be picked…
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 09:46 PM
1

Indeed. When they find a guy they like that they have a real shot at fucking/dating without being rejected, they fold. Here's an amusing example of 'the only exception' in r/relationships that got supportive comments (she fucks and sucks him in the update): https://archive.today/BnwZs And this little gem from Salon is from a woman marrying a man, no longer dating women and still hamsters that she's a lesbian: https://archive.today/bIq60 Oh and if you're familiar with Erika Moen, she literally ma…
/r/TheRedPill17/03/15 08:48 AM
1

My rebuttal is specifically addressing your argument that birth control or voluntarily forgoing procreation in a heterosexual context is a mental illness. I never asserted that men can't be innately wired that way; that's a different argument that has nothing to do with my report which is based on direct experience with lesbians. You're arguing in circles looking for holes. Have fun with that.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/15 10:21 PM
1

Your argument makes no sense. Nature gave us a pre-frontal cortex so that our logic can override our impulses when necessary since evolution clearly determined that we required an expanded form of self control when compared to other beasts. If I choose to kill someone because I instinctively and rationally conclude that I'm in danger, my brain is working just fine. If I randomly kill people on impulse with no emotional response, a few wires got crossed somewhere. Choosing not to procreate becaus…
/r/TheRedPill16/03/15 10:03 PM
2

Yeah, some lesbians are stupid hot and don't know what to do with it. After a while you start to get a feel for which lesbians are the most into you and how to navigate the hurdle they present, which has the side benefit of providing social proof. In some cases this has caused a domino effect where a social group of lesbians can get curious and want a turn with you if they know you've given one of their kin good sex. Unfortunately the discussion of lesbians is either taboo or nobody bothers so I…
/r/TheRedPill16/03/15 04:57 PM
2

Much appreciated. I admit I was prepared for an angry shitstorm as a result of posting this, but I'm relieved to see that my experiences aren't isolated from what others have been through.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/15 04:47 PM
3

Yeah okay, if you say so. Nobody said anything about gay men, and you're assuming that male homosexuality works the same way as a female's.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/15 03:04 AM
6

I only went for the ones who had an ugly girl complex but turned out attractive.
/r/TheRedPill15/03/15 09:05 PM
25

Where's the beef? Can't argue with French Toast dude. His walking away was appropriate because her first response was to put herself on a pedestal and then try to get him to qualify himself, pulling him into her frame. By flipping that shit from the beginning so that she had to qualify herself to him, instead she got pulled into his frame. In essence, he turned her qualifying question into a dis-qualifier for herself. Her hamster probably ate away thinking that she'd have to play nice if she wan…
/r/TheRedPill14/03/15 07:09 PM
1

Nearly any glass container will do. In so far as plastics, the ziplocks mentioned in OP are one option or if you need to order them online from places like Amazon, here's an example of a decent set I used. They even come in a Bento box-like variety. http://www.amazon.com/Plastic-Reusable-Container-Microwave-Dishwasher/dp/B00SX9XFMU/ref=sr_1_4?s=home-garden&ie=UTF8&qid=1426350494&sr=1-4&keywords=polypropylene+container
/r/TheRedPill14/03/15 04:30 PM
1

So. Much. This. The point isn't about how good you are at playing the odds or how you think your alpha-ness will keep her happy, the point is that playing against the house is always a fool's gamble. There's no reason to bring Uncle Sam into it. The point of marriage contracts has been rendered obsolete with the government now providing for them. They don't need your shit too. EDIT: Wording.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/15 06:01 PM
1

Even if that generalization is accurate, it still wouldn't matter. I'll grant you that they might be socially awkward and thirsty, but they still don't escalate and they still don't get laid. They're not going to pass up a superior technology that gives them orgasms when they're not having success with women anyway. If they want validation, they have many other avenues to generate that emotion. The "it's not like the real thing" argument completely falls apart for the simple fact that the porn i…
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 09:29 PM
3

Guys only want validation from women so that they're down to fuck. It's a means to an end, not the end itself. If they're sufficiently getting their rocks off (look at the plethora of porn addicts whose brain reward pathways changed), then female validation becomes obsolete and irrelevant.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 08:57 PM
77

I disagree. They won't and can't. The sex industry is too big and in a free digital economy, people can program and design whatever they please. Just look at the Japanese market for digital sex games. The only controls they would exert already exist, such as the MA and AO ratings for videogames. Fleshlights and all manner of porn are easily available on the internet, so that's not going anywhere soon. If anything, women and feminists will screech and try to shame the beta nerds and WoW addicts, …
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 07:29 PM
0

You being married is a useful distinction. Your post makes more sense in that context. Had she been a girlfriend or a plate, you'd have gotten some sideways glances.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 07:07 PM
1

This doesn't vibe right with me. While it sounds like you're trying to aim for 'Alpha Bux', it sounds more like you're the Beta Bux that she doesn't have to see all that often. A high value Beta, but a Beta never-the-less. So during the admittedly limited time you spend with this girl, she gets driven around, and fed for free? Merely buying a [cheap] dessert or putting out when you see her isn't contributing. Not once did I read any mention of what she does for you, only what you do for her. I t…
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 06:29 PM
2

The way you're championing the use of Glyphosate almost makes me think you're a corporate shill. 3 replies downplaying endocrine disruption in one thread? Reeks of an agenda.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/15 02:45 PM
4

Not sure what you're trying to prove, but that study is obsolete. There are quite a few more recent studies suggesting otherwise. Glyphosate-based herbicides are toxic and endocrine disruptors in human cell lines Glyphosate-based herbicides are the most widely used across the world; they are commercialized in different formulations. Their residues are frequent pollutants in the environment. In addition, these herbicides are spread on most eaten transgenic plants, modified to tolerate high levels…
/r/TheRedPill11/03/15 02:42 PM
5

The most common sources of endocrine disruptors come from soy, processed/microwaveables, and non-organic produce (conventional produce is sprayed with glyphosate like a motherfucker). Food containers notwithstanding, watching what you eat will have a massive impact in that regard. Personally I prep basically everything from scratch or near-scratch and then use glass/biosafe plastic containers to ration out my meals for work.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/15 12:48 AM
1

Your rhetoric is bigger than your imagination. Having all the nobler, thinking, self-actualized Alphas of the world remove their genetic legacy from society at large in the name of 'enlightenment' is hardly dreaming bigger. If you're playing at a level where your life's work will outlive you, you're going to want to groom someone you trust to run it. A man with no competent heirs will see his dynasty die with him. It would be like burning a library once all the authors stopped writing. Believe i…
/r/TheRedPill09/03/15 06:18 PM
1

I never said getting married is a good idea, I'm suggesting that OP's philosophy doesn't work unless you intend to remove yourself from any possibility of fatherhood.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/15 05:41 PM
13

So you're cock blocking yourself? What a useless and counterproductive emotion. All that feeling bad isn't gonna make your dick feel good. If your female friends wanted some, they can volunteer and come get some. You aren't responsible for their self image. Stop being such a pussy and get over it.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/15 02:58 PM
8

This is all well and good unless you plan to raise offspring.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/15 05:19 AM
1

TRP is about casting aside social conditioning and self-acualization in order to realize your potential and optimize your sexual prowess (as an emergent property). If you cannot see the relevance of the OP, that is your failure.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/15 01:45 AM
2

Oh look, another woman who thinks she knows better than TRP because she's such a special little snowflake. You have yet to present a rational case, so you're just arguing for the sake of itself and deflecting any points you can't address. Very rarely will women admit to being a gold digger; they always try to paint themselves as a noble ride-or-die-bitch who doesn't care about material things because NAWALT. Nope, AWALT. If you have something of value to offer other than straw men, feel free to …
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 08:18 PM
3

We don't need to know how gravity works in order to be affected by it, but you can't use what you don't understand. Without dissecting the human body we never would've understood human biology and medicine to the degree we do. Your shoot first, think later philosophy is somewhat reckless and anti-intellectual in tone. If you don't have an adequate understanding of gravity, then you won't know how much force or lift you'll need to generate to counteract it in order to fly. On a secondary note: [i…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/15 07:45 PM
4

I am reminded of an old saying/lyric where there ain't no such thing as 'halfway crooks'. Commit or quit. We don't get the luxury of having our cake and eating it too.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/15 06:02 PM
3

Next. You were honest about your intentions and what you want, but with these girls it goes in one ear and out the other. What the hamster really heard was you offering them a challenge to win you over and when it fails, they cry in order to mourn over the hit to their ego. They assumed that by helping you get off a few times, you'd fall for them; manipulation via sex and crocodile tears. Hold frame and let them go. You aren't responsible for their delusions. You're going to need to develop a th…
/r/TheRedPill28/02/15 07:35 PM
3

As everyone else has indicated: you are a threat. These types of women don't like it when one of their own raises the bar because the idea of working hard to secure a worthwhile man offends the hamster. They don't like the idea of not being good enough or you getting all the attention because the contrast draws too much attention to their own faults. They'd rather Prince Charming just shows up and give em Princess treatment while they lounge on the couch watching Orange is the New Black as a pil…
/r/RedPillWomen28/02/15 06:34 PM
5

Your rhetoric is invalid. Just because unattractive women don't get hit on by the same guys that their hotter friends do, doesn't mean they can't get laid. It's not hard for some broke, lazy, fat chick to get dick the same day she decides to without having to buy it. Inversely, the same can't be said of a broke and lazy fat man.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 10:01 PM
2

Do what you gotta do. Only boys and bitches whine about things they don't want to do, men just nut up and get it done anyway. High school isn't about education, it's about indoctrinating people out of original thinking and into reflexively obeying authority to sustain a docile work force. That said, there is immense value in learning to complete something you don't want to do. Life isn't all entertainment. Doing your work in order to challenge yourself to be disciplined is a personal skill that …
/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 07:49 PM
1

The notion of a 'try-hard' is a form of effort-shaming by lazy people who want to coast through life instead of hitting the gas to get where they want to be. Besides, what everyone else thinks of the sub is irrelevant. Truth is self evident and requires no defense.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 04:51 PM
2

This. I prefer the Machiavellian approach to a generalized apathy. You shouldn't care about the opinions of others, but you should be concerned with the image and reputation you hold in the minds of others.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/15 03:43 PM
1

False. Aside from what everyone else has said regarding this, healthy eating and weight management goes far beyond calories in vs calories out. The real deal is about the metabolic pathways different types of food take and the hormonal responses they trigger (fat storage vs fat burning, etc). 100 calories of cake is not the same as 100 calories of broccoli. Completely different nutrient profile. That said, healthful foods nourish you quicker due to the density of the nutrients. Junk food is empt…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 06:01 PM
6

Lol you're only 16, you haven't even scratched the surface of your potential. It's hard for you to imagine being even better later in life because you have no idea how high the mountain top goes. Right now you're just coasting, life hasn't forced you to hit the gas pedal yet. You still have to master yourself among other things, but the fact that you're on TRP at such a young age means potentially great things for your 20s and beyond.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 03:36 PM
1

According to the Freudian model you are absolutely correct. The context I'm using it in is the more esoteric, meditative or 'spiritually' minded one which is how I interpreted your post.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 07:04 PM
2

I would argue that 'Ego' is an inaccurate term for what you are describing. Not unlike how 'jealous' is used interchangeably with 'envious'. Your Ego in this context is merely your fixed point of awareness/consciousness; without which you would not be an individual let alone self aware. A more appropriate phrase would be "Kill your IDENTITY". Your identity is the mythos a person constructs around their Ego; their personal narrative of who they are. Your Ego is the aperture through which you obse…
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 06:24 PM
3

Your interpretation is too absolutist. A full life is not emotional abandonment. I'm not suggesting you should be deliberately hiding in your house maniacally running dread on her as some sort of narcissistic mind-op, I'm saying that you should be sincerely occupied, ideally in a productive fashion. If a girlfriend wants to peel you away, it needs to be for a damn good reason. Obviously you can't completely ignore a girlfriend (especially if you've set a precedent of making her your whole world)…
/r/TheRedPill19/02/15 01:07 AM
9

Especially if she's your girlfriend. You don't owe her your time, she needs to earn it. Your life should revolve around you; I guarantee she puts herself first in this way no matter what kind of game she runs. Unless of course you're a low value male with too much free time on his hands in which case, you've got work to do.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/15 12:16 AM
0

Thousands of years of historical precedent (all the way back to ancient Athens) in addition to present-day pattern says you're full of shit my good sir. Fiat currency is created by governments when they want to spend beyond their capacity, so they debase the currency in order to continue inflating. Essentially this robs people at the back end, transferring the wealth created by the production of the masses to those in control of the system. Your birth certificate is basically a bond treasury; lo…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 02:58 PM
1

The problem isn't that she had a lot going for her, the problem is that she was incapable of recognizing the value of her life and the people still in it. It's amazing how your beliefs influence both brain chemistry and physical health. She didn't come out broken, something along the way broke her and she was ill-equipped to fix it. No dopamine to be had because her threshold was much higher based on her conditioning and expectations. She had an idea of what her life was supposed to be based on …
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 09:15 PM
2

You argue like a feminist. So deriving your personal satisfaction from within rather than being dependent on the validation of women is hatred? What an irrational and pathetic response. By the way: when you post material and encourage others to read it, expect feedback and criticisms. I tend to read articles before disagreeing with them; it's called due diligence. I am under no obligation to fuck off, however your incongruence and opposition to TRP philosophy is quite likely to get you banned at…
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 08:21 PM
7

You haven't learned anything. Peddle your wares elsewhere. This is the kind of drivel the vets are referring to when they speak of shills trying to hijack the message and meaning of TRP philosophy. I checked out your article too for the sake of being thorough, and it is nothing more than male hamstering trying to justify the externalization of personal satisfaction and purpose to women. Internalize the sidebar, or begone with you sir.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 07:55 PM
2

You aren't seeing the forest for the trees. Only one person in the comments at the time of this reply gloated over her suicide. Pay attention. The purpose of this post (while somewhat redundant) is to illustrate the impact of feminism on the collective emotional health of women nearing the end of their sexually competitive period. When women commit suicide, it is frequently because of issues pertaining to romance. A secondary observation being made in the comments is that nobody gives a shit whe…
/r/TheRedPill11/02/15 07:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter