TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RP_Magnus Archive

View 1 post and 140 comments by RP_Magnus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
75

Red Pill ExampleRP_Magnus/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 03:47 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

You haven't internalized TRP theory's or you'd recognize this. I try not to take anything as dogma.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/14 02:05 AM
0

Want to join my church? Sunday, we have incest orgies including farm animals after we blow our loads all over a gold statue of a bonobo.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/14 11:50 PM
-1

lol, sputtering panic, I think I need to wipe your spit off my face. Don't have a stroke buddy. :)
/r/TheRedPill07/05/14 11:47 PM
1

I've read both Sex at Dusk and Sex at Dawn, and Sex at Dusk is a poorly written joke.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/14 06:19 PM
1

Sure! Whats your education background by the way?
/r/TheRedPill07/05/14 05:40 AM
1

wow, nice point.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/14 05:39 AM
0

It is a lot of different sources compiled from books I have read over the years combined with articles and studies. Due to finals I didn't have time to properly reference and format everything. In addition, I think somepeople are going to shoot from the hip and deny it because it doesn't resonate with their preconceived notions. Others might have background knowledge to compare it to and do critical things. If it seems controversial to you, you should look at both sides of the argument and come …
/r/TheRedPill07/05/14 05:39 AM
1

you do that, you'll start to eliminate all the junk in your writing, and a result of that would be a refinement of your ideas. That would make your work read a lot easier, plus you might even come up with new stuff to say or ideas to get across as you go long. Sounds good, I am sometimes worried about leaving out too many details, maybe I shouldn't try to predict responses and deal with them ahead of time? Thanks!
/r/TheRedPill07/05/14 02:09 AM
1

Pretty much, good points.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/14 02:05 AM
0

Your talking out your ass while I have sources to back my claims. your language and insults means it isn't worth having a real discussion cause your too immature to separate your your logic from your emotions. I hear women love that by the way.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/14 02:05 AM
2

That is why I love this sort of exchange. I learned a ton about genetics and mating systems from all of our discussion. Excellent summary!
/r/TheRedPill07/05/14 12:04 AM
1

I agree, and that is a good point, won't be doing that again.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 10:37 PM
0

Yeah its philosophy bullshit, but that is what it seemed like you were asking. I don't have a model for alpha/beta dynamics. If I were to speculate I would say that acting more like a HG man would be more attractive to women, which makes sense along alpha qualities. Aloofness, independence, strength, health ect were common among HG's, due their relative fitness compared to the average man in the western world. We have to workout and life weights just to get the same physique they did by simply l…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 10:37 PM
1

Understood, I completely regret using broscience as it offered nothing but politically loaded language. I thought it would be a "fun" title, woops.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 10:13 PM
0

Yeah I would rename the title if I could, politically loaded language, is something I have only just learned about from a great Chinese Politics class. I definitely regret using BroScience.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 10:06 PM
1

Yeah I learned a lesson about politically loaded language today and saw it in action. BroScience a negative thing being associated with TRP a positive thing led to some mental breakdowns.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 10:05 PM
0

Yeah maybe I was a bit rude to that guy. I just don understand what his deal with telling me to relax and spend more time talking to women, working out and enjoying being a man. I do all those things. Fair enough not many good accounts of hunter gatherer life exist from the last 300 years. That is why you need to consider the biological aspect of sperm competition and comparative anatomy. Many great points. My agenda is that women are not innately hypergamous status oriented whores but they are …
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 10:04 PM
1

I don't believe the matter is too complex for science. Polyandry, is a form of polygamy whereby a woman takes two or more husbands at the same time. Perhaps the concepts of marriage, husbands, and wives, are the confusing part here. Anthropologist up until more recently had a long history of calling anyone who was having sex or close to the opposite sex a husband or a wife. This projection of western culture onto distance and remote tribes, creates a bit of confusion. Removed the wife and husban…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 09:55 PM
-1

How fucking high are you, lol? You get on reddit to tell people to relax, that is strange man?
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 06:47 PM
1

Why not give them some hope that all women aren't divorce raping whore?
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 06:32 PM
-1

Then wtf are you doing, being the TRP police, I could say the same thing for you?
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 06:23 PM
1

My background is half anthropology/environmental history and the rest is organic chemistry. I am familiar with the hard science approach. The best example for ancestral human mating systems is Bonobos. I think you are arguing that environmental conditions define mating systems, therefore ancestral environment is irrelevant? This is the gene-environment mismatch theory which seems similar to the novel environment hypothesis stating that our biology is best suited to our HG lifestyle. Essentially,…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 06:12 PM
0

It adds the idea that if this is social programming it can be deprogrammed or programmed over. So it adds some methods for dealing with the challenges of LTR relationships perhaps. It puts much more emphasis on having a healthy sex life with your LTR partner, the canary in the coal mine. Also diets more similar to ancestral environments seem to have substantial health benefits.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 05:58 PM
1

Nope, but this view is worthy of discussion in my opinion.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 05:55 PM
0

There is nothing wrong with using a mental model, but if you convince yourself that the model is real you can miss out on a lot of things. Alive is alive. Dead is dead. What is the definition of dead or alive? It is arbitrary, no brain activity. But the cells are still alive and function hours after until a cascade of calcium channel effects initiate apoptosis. Many people study these effects redefining these simple definitions. Fucking is fucking and not fucking is not fucking. So is it where t…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 05:53 PM
0

Sure Stature and robusticity during the agricultural transition: evidence from the bioarchaeological record. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21507735 This is less controversial because there is physical evidence via bones. This seems absolutely false; food was much more scare pre-agricultural society, and malnourishment or lack of food can lead to stunted growth. Scarcity is a function of available food per population, while absolute amount of food was higher so was population density, per ca…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 05:43 PM
0

Woah, we are talking about different things. I don't disagree with any of this at all. It is not at all relevant to the sexual market. I agree, the point that the sexual marketplace was very very very different place pre-agriculture.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 04:17 PM
0

didn't know this about English. Interesting!
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 04:13 PM
1

Yeah I am regretting using the word broscience, because it is too broad, poorly defined and politically loaded. Although, if I didn't have a eye catching title many people might not even see this. who knows.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 04:13 PM
2

Thanks!
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 04:08 PM
1

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -Aristotle Sound familiar? ;) Appreciate it! Feel free to engage in what you don't believe in and why. I get to learn from the feedback as well, helps my writing. :)
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 04:08 PM
-1

confidence sometimes gets confused for that. Want to measure dicks next?
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 04:07 PM
1

Yeah I could have put more effort into this, but I had finals to study for :/. What about the coherency would you change? Agreed, I definitely need to work on my writing skills, several semesters of organic chemistry does that to a man. :D
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 04:05 PM
0

Excellent points, wow!:D "One way to sum up the Blue Pill is to describe it as the fiction that female instinct and modern civilization are perfectly aligned in how they would prefer that men behave." That is a great way to put it. Maybe one day my writing can be this good :D
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 04:03 PM
0

Thanks! I am glad you found it interesting! for the sake of my wealth, I do. agreed, I said TRP was great for practical reasons like this, that is why I even bother posting and reading stuff here. I guess it is just that distinction between women programmed to be like this and society programming them that shifts the blame in a more useful way. Lot of post about people resentful of women over their "innate programming" which I think is not very useful and kind of dangerous idea. The kind used to…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 04:00 PM
-1

sleep with whichever males end up at the top. Monogamy? Why can she only sleep with one male? Much safer and more efficient for her to leave all the risk taking and judging to the males and just go with whomever we end up sorting out as the top 20%. I am arguing it is safer and more efficient for to sleep with many of the healthiest and most attractive males. different behaviors and biological imperatives. I am arguing that a good portion of this is behavior and not biological imperative. Instea…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 03:55 PM
1

In my opinion, when you start to remove the biases of the idea of "humans," and look at them as funny looking ape creatures, it is really hard to see anyone as evil or good. I think people are just trying to make conflicting decisions about what they want vs what their culture wants, with the knowledge and genetics they have been given.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 03:51 PM
0

Did you read a couple of bad pop science books and think you have a background? Sounds like we disagree one the word "background." I am referring to higher education. You can find sources that disagree with any sort of concept and those that support it. Ultimately it is up to you to parse out the differences with critical thinking.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 03:48 PM
0

Yeah, but ultimately, is that the direction you want our society moving to? For practical purposes I am not sure gangbangs would be better or worse for society. although, moving towards the HG lifestyle can have some benefits particularly with diet. Eat diverse foods and less processed added sugars and foods for example, seems more reasonable than gangbangs. That is why I listed: http://www.marksdailyapple.com/ I doubt very many looked at the links or did their own research though. Its mostly be…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 03:46 PM
1

Maybe this? Among the Siriono of Bolivia, jealousy tends to arise not because one’s spouse has lovers, but because he or she is devoting too much time and energy to those lovers. According to anthropologist Allan Holmberg, “Romantic love is a concept foreign to the Siriono. Sex, like hunger , is a drive to be satisfied.” The expression secubi ( “I like ”) is used in reference to everything the Siriono enjoy , whether food, jewelry, or a sexual partner. "Anthropologist William Crocker is convince…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 03:42 PM
1

I wouldn't argue with that.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 03:36 PM
0

Binary thinking is just a way to create a mental model to more quickly and easily understand things for practical purposes. That doesn't mean that it has a fundamental basis in reality. The models aren't reality no matter how much people choose to believe they are.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 03:35 PM
-1

I didn't say it was easy. You can reject Christian values and become an Atheist if you choose to. Why does jealousy, have to be different? I honestly doubt swingers and people in open relationships or poly-amorous relationships are all just repressing an immense amount of jealousy.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 03:34 PM
2

Why is that?
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 03:31 PM
2

Whether the woman has choice is a complicated matter and difficult to interpret without a time machine. Did these women accept these sperm competition situations or did they resent this behavior? It might be a bit of projecting current values onto the past in this situation. If you put a modern woman back into the past she might see that situation as slutty or rape, whereas a HG woman might see it as a perfectly normal part of living. Paternity tests would kill this society. Pretty much. HG did …
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 03:30 PM
0

Yeah the circle-jerk effect is really annoying. Well I think in that environment women not wanting to fuck betas could have been really bad for tribal tensions and the survival of the whole group. I read selfish gene myself and I think it lacks in the indirect selection or kin selection area. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kin_selection Honestly, genetics and terminology isn't something I have a lot of background, so I am still learning. I am trying to figure out how fitness worked within this sor…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 03:19 PM
0

Physical anthropology and comparative anatomy isn't quite on the same level as "broscience" in my opinion. Early men did not understand genetics and that sex leads directly to pregnancy which is a bit of science we find hard to believe that we didn't always know. Good points though.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 03:15 PM
0

Phsyical anthropology and comparative anatomy isn't quite on the same level as "broscience" in my opinion. Your on point about criticism and coming out swinging though. Maybe I needed to define BroScience, popular opinions based upon psuedo-logic and anecdotal evidence from personal experience?
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 03:11 PM
-2

Thanks bro, I'll tell my wife that.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 03:10 PM
0

Sounds sexy
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 03:09 PM
1

Reminds me of maslow's heirarchy of needs. Maybe it is when women live in relative abundance they revert to their promiscuous nature? Would make sense since relative abundance dropped a significant amount after agriculture. Good point! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow's_hierarchy_of_needs
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 03:09 PM
-2

You wouldn't know that by a large amount of the rhetoric on here. You don't believe that, good for you. However this straw man wasn't constructed by me and he isn't made of straw. There have been a good amount of post who are depressed and resentful of women after indulging in TRP, due to this theory on the nature of women, for better or worse.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 07:13 AM
10

This is impressive and exciting, I get to actually learn from a reddit response holy shit! I'd buy you a beer or 10 If I ever met you! Men were still VERY interested in finding out and ensuring a child was theirs. Raising another individuals child is evolutionary costly. Due to this men have and always have engaged in mate guarding, particularly when she is fertile Conditional expression of women's desires and men's mate guarding across the ovulatory cycle: I would challenge you here by arguing …
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 07:08 AM
1

Yeah, I need to do a blogpost about this common lack of critical thinking or debate/discussion skills. If nothing else it will make writing skills better slowly over time. Thanks http://thearchdruidreport.blogspot.com/2013/11/toward-green-future-part-two-age-of.html If you are partial to this sort of thing you might find this interesting.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 06:35 AM
-2

Agreed. Wow, it is a relief to find someone that can actually discuss something without getting emotionally involved, holy shit, I'd buy you a beer if I ever met you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mating_system http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Promiscuity I think promiscuity is the argument I am making exclusively for Paleolithic Hunter Gatherers. This is where men have multiple partners as well as females and marriage isn't recognized. This goes along with the argument that this is the state the hum…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 06:31 AM
1

I'd like to think so. It really seems like anything that doesn't have a RP dicktease aspect to it is immediately labeled blue pill and marginalized. I've done the same thing on r/renewable energy and r/science trying to discuss Biophysical economics and the same sort of things happens. Thanks for being rational, gives me hope.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 06:25 AM
1

I feel like reddit in general is less and less tolerant of even mildly contrasting views as times goes on, maybe I am just noticing it more. whoever coined the term circle-jerk was a genius though. It is frustrating though. Although one guy actually replied discussing pastoral societies which was probably one of the few reasoned responses based upon more than gut feeling and anecdotal experience, that was nice.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 06:15 AM
-8

Yeah your right about Pastoral peoples. That is more in depth than I wanted to go. The reasoning would be monogamy and paternity became an issue with the rise of private property. All the cultures discussed in the literature were pre-pastoralism. Honestly, thank you for taking the time to give a reasoned response without a ton of vitriol. The civic orgy warrants more discussion, but apparently not here. Kind of jaded right now because I took the time to try and write and format this 1500 word th…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 06:11 AM
1

Yeah probably not. Kind of pissed I took the all the time to write a 1500 word post with links, content, and formatting, and it gets taken down in an hour. Its probably similar to telling Christians about evolution or telling Liberals about gun rights. If they get bad associations from it they stick their fingers in their ears and close their eyes. Fucking ostrich people man.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 06:05 AM
-8

Children are taught concepts of property from a pretty young age. wouldn't want to bring science into this.. http://pss.sagepub.com/content/22/2/267.abstract
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 05:57 AM
1

So there is no way that 3 year olds could pick up on behavior from their environment? You have to explain that away for me to accept your point. I think this was taken down anyway, oh well, so much for logical and rational Red Pill men juxtaposed with emotional women.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 05:51 AM
3

Apparently you can't discuss things like this on TRP, people immediately get emotional and mods take it down. So much for logical and rational men juxtaposed with emotional women. I am starting to think TRP is just a promotion platform for the blogs on the sidebar where a bunch of neckbeards make up shit about how to get women and make money off all the views of men searching for answers.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 05:47 AM
0

Better than reading circle-jerk articles, but then again critical thinking takes actual effort.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 05:37 AM
7

Do your own research or show me some that contradicts this. There is plenty of evidence that he wouldn't care. The book "Sex at Dawn" covers this exact issue among many different tribes. Among the Siriono of Bolivia, jealousy tends to arise not because one’s spouse has lovers, but because he or she is devoting too much time and energy to those lovers. According to anthropologist Allan Holmberg, “Romantic love is a concept foreign to the Siriono. Sex, like hunger , is a drive to be satisfied.” Th…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 05:34 AM
-1

What is the point of your first post besides voicing that "you disagree"? I would love to discuss where our differences are so we can come to a better understanding. People used to do that not too long ago, but it has fallen out of fashion. Sorry if If i come off as patronizing. :)
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 05:29 AM
-5

Can you quote where I said that I believe women are weaker than men, for me please?
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 05:27 AM
-1

Probably, that was just meant to be fun trivia.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 05:26 AM
-3

No, not at all. Women are weaker than men, that is why they don't compete in the same ways in sports or the olympics. I've seen enough men's gymnastics to know women don't do the rings or pommel horse. I was saying the "BroScience" is what follows after that thought, leading to women are hypergamous wealth sucking divorce raping whore BY NATURE. Most women in the western world probably are.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 05:26 AM
6

So what are you trying to say? Most American women are hypergamous wealth sucking whores, I'd agree with that statement. The point of the write-up wasn't that most aren't, just that there is no "genetic" or "by nature" component to it.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 05:24 AM
-1

"The idea of nasty, short, savage and brutish, lives comes from Thomas Hobbes who grew up in early Industrial Revolution England, which was really nasty, brutish and short." I don't think Feminist should use that as a goal anymore than you. Yet there is NO civilization on the world that can be described as anything CLOSE to modern where the overwhelming majority of men don't care about their paternity. If you read the article more carefully that is exactly what I said. Keyword is "civilization",…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 05:20 AM
1

That part is a fact, the BroScience is the assumptions that follow.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 05:16 AM
-3

Generalizing all women into a single category is too. :) All Jews are greedy hooknosed cockroaches who want to try to control the world, follow?
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 05:15 AM
-4

You write a lot without saying much at all. And your doing what?
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 05:13 AM
-1

Bingo. I have no idea why anyone thought I was questioning that? I don't expect this information to be well received overall though. If you can learn anything from evolutionary anthropology is that people do things off of pure association unless they are consciously thinking it through. This post will set off some bad associations for some people and they will shoot from the hip.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 05:12 AM
-2

Just fun background information. Stature and robusticity during the agricultural transition: evidence from the bioarchaeological record. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21507735 if you want to do some critical research.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 05:11 AM
3

I challenge you to do some independent research and come to your own conclusions. :) edit: interesting word choice, "Takedown." ;) Maybe BroScience in my title turned some people off?
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 05:09 AM
-2

Yeah the women hating, due to their nature is what gets me. Its really unnecessary I didn't have much room for it but the Alpha/Beta/Omega meme is another sticky myth of broscience. These terms were used on wolves during the 1940's in "Expressions Studies on Wolves." "As research on wolves, both captive and wild, continues, we develop a more complex, nuanced picture of wolf behavior. But the easy notion of the "alpha wolf" still persists. Certainly in entertainment it has made for some nice stor…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 05:07 AM
3

Basically yes. I just read this a few days ago on the front page. "I've learned the nature of women, and it depresses the shit out of me" I think this sort of reasoning is unnecessary. Besides the theory part, TRP is just increase your SMV through self improvement, beware of the hypergamous women and play to their narrative. And learn what you can from traditional gender roles.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 05:02 AM
0

I can tell you read the article ;)
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 04:59 AM
1

Boy do I have a treat for you then, I'll pm you my new post. You weren't the first to ask me this,
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 03:39 AM
2

all these broscience theories focus around monogamy as an assumption.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/14 10:21 PM
2

will do. Thanks
/r/TheRedPill05/05/14 10:21 PM
2

the size difference didn't matter as much until the strictly enforced religious customs of agricultural civilization. Monogamy is the confusing factor here. If you look at hunter gather tribes without the distortion of mongamy you can see how group dynamics change the question completely. To be more direct hunter gatherer women were protected by most of the tribes men, and were not exclusive to one man. You can see how this sexual strategy would pay off. Why be protected by one man when you can …
/r/TheRedPill05/05/14 10:15 PM
3

I asked you this, part of my degree involved human evolutionary history and anthropology. I would challenge you to do a bit more research on the Flintstones like version of the hobbesian (nasty, brutish, short) depiction of hunter gathererer life. However, your assertion that we have hardly changed genetically since those days is backed up heavily by evidence. I have been running a fools errand for a while on TRP trying to let people understand a different point of view, that women are not genet…
/r/TheRedPill05/05/14 08:58 PM
3

So where'd you learn this stuff?
/r/TheRedPill05/05/14 04:08 PM
1

That's all fine. Good work! Just don't expect to get abs that way. Abs are made in the kitchen, and can't be obtained by any amount of cardio or lifting. You have to eat damn near perfectly and in many ways quite boring to get a low body fat percentage. There is some sort of weird meme that perpetuates the idea that you get abs by exercising.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 09:03 AM
4

"motivated me to start cutting and pick up the cardio so after my two slices." This is not how you get "cut up." Going for a run after pizza? Are you serious?
/r/TheRedPill14/04/14 03:21 PM
1

Alright, so I reviewed our entire series of replies. Looks like we got off track onto a few tangents a while ago. I must have glanced over the word "principle component". I am not sure that we actually disagree. I accept that must of our behavior is governed by biology. Simple lust or assessing attractiveness is assessed in fractions of a second by our neural circuitry. However, some the "hamstering" that women use to try and appear chaste or benefit economically from a relationship, is not biol…
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 04:59 AM
1

So at its most reduced parts the brain is deterministic. So what? Does that mean it is predictable or as a whole deterministic? I don't think so. I don't think there is any practical value or knowledge we can glean from this? Modeling cause and effect in these systems are impossible because it is so complex. How can you actually say the brain as a whole works in a deterministic fashion if you can't model it or predict it? Are you arguing that social conditioning doesn't exist? Are you saying tha…
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 04:35 AM
-1

That's funny, without reductionist thinking you wouldn't have your computer, keyboard, monitor, cellphone or any technology to spout your soft science nonsense.> Your putting words in my mouth. I never said reductionist thinking wasn't useful. You cannot apply deterministic reduction models to everything. If you think you can, that is truly sad. You have convinced yourself that your models ARE reality, and not an abstraction of it. "computers are deterministic therefore the brain is deterministi…
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 12:44 AM
0

So computers are deterministic therefore the brain is deterministic. ok..... "brain functions similarly"... similarly really... Of course many of the systems are deterministic. I think you are ignorant of the systems science point of view. Mainly emergent properties that are the result of large numbers of smaller interactions that form non-deterministic properties as a whole. I am sorry but I don't think the world fits in the nice neat little reductionist box you want it too. Large numbers of in…
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 11:31 PM
5

Your argument is not very persuasive one way or another. The brain is a complex system and saying it is mathematically deterministic is a joke. I have never seen any information which validates anything your saying.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 10:44 PM
3

Yes, it is impossible to know for sure. It is really damn near impossible to be a parent and shelter your kids from all the social programming bullshit . They will pick it all up eventually anyway and likely subvert your strict controls anyway. The best thing I think can be done is to expose your children to, but frame the discussion for them when they are old enough to understand. Build critical thinking skills. What would happen if snow white was a man, how would the story sound, ect. Good luc…
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 08:46 PM
7

Are you really throwing a false binary at me? Either it must be 100% environment or 100% nature. It is more like 50/50. There is plenty of literature on this. Are you familiar with Epigentics?
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 08:43 PM
11

" Don't forget what's it like to be alive." So good, this has led to myself taking more control of my own relationship and taking a lets make this work or GTFO stance. It is almost like the more afraid you are to lose someone the more likely you are making that happen.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 07:44 PM
1

No offence taken. I don't get offended by opinions. You can't quantify benefits and negatives. That is a qualitative statement which is subject to your beliefs and values. We have entered outside the realm where science can moderate our discussion. I can agree to disagree.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 07:38 PM
12

I apologize for the snarkiness, I sometimes become jaded on how easy people, see something and quickly decide it must be human nature, this sort of logic. It is really common and perpetuates itself when other people see this form of reasoning. With a background in Anthropology I made this account specifically to address pseudo-evolutionary reasoning on TheRedPill. In short argument, is that you are severely underestimating the amount of information your daughter sees and hears, and incorporates …
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 07:36 PM
2

There is a clear Pseudo-evolutionary reason not to. Reality is always far more complex. With a background in Anthropology I made this account specifically to address pseudo-evolutionary reasoning on TheRedPill. Short reasoning: Ancestral Humans lived in egalitarian bands of up to 150 individuals. Monogamy was not relevant and not used. Children were communally raised. Multiple partners for both men and women were common and served the function of easing group tensions and strengthening bonds. Pa…
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 07:13 PM
13

"This is a five year old, so this isn't social conditioning... seems to come naturally." That is some solid reasoning there buddy. lol
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 07:03 PM
1

What is your point? Unprotected sex and STD's are bad? Alright, duh.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 07:17 PM
1

I think it is a counterproductive and sick way to do it. He is training her to be a good whore by using her chastity as an economic good to bargain with. This is the sort of philosophy that make women think divorce rape is alright.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 06:27 PM
1

I think trying to control someones sexlife would be a big part of them becoming a slut. You sound like youd love to live in Saudi complete with moral police detaining you and harassing you for violating any social norm. It is not a matter of what I want. I don't believe in trying to control people, instead educating them to make their own choices. It is not my place.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 06:20 PM
-7

Fathers have no business controlling their daughters sex life. That is just fuckd up.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 05:01 PM
1

I see, I believe the concept of a structural conspiracy is simi!ar, which is perfectly reasonable. However, Jared Diamond representing an progressive view instead of a darker eugenic truth is really odd. I really find his geographic determinism view much more parsimonious than some IQ based theory. This sort of view of human agency is very arrogant in my opinion. It is the same sort of reasoning that determines human technology will advance into infinity until we fufill some escape from the huma…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 04:30 PM
1

Could you elaborate more on this? I am not sure you understand my views very well. I have read over much of the dark enlightenment and while they're is a lot of truth there, though I can't stand the futurist aspects of it. There is also a large helping of conspiracy theory and eclectic eugenics talk, which I find a bit ridiculous. Maybe this doesn't represent you or is a misunderstanding. Feel free to expand.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 06:10 AM
1

Not anymore for the majority of people anyway.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 12:40 AM
0

There is too much really. This article takes the Hobbesian , "nasty, brutish, short" meme for Hunter Gatherers too far. ----------------------------------------- "You are part of a small human group fighting to stay alive. The reason why doesn’t matter. Conquest, war, death, hunger or disease—any of The Horsemen will do." ---------------------------------- The four horsemen were the result of the massive social changes of agriculture. There may have been the odd murder or two but by an large the…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 12:34 AM
0

I really hate articles that theorycraft about primal life and ancient human ancestry without a shred of knowledge of human evolutionary history or anthropology. This article is crap, guilty of "flinstonization,"creating a false narrative about the past to justify present decisions and theories, yabba dabba doo.... TRP works as a framework for present day relationships set in an intensive agricultural setting and complex society. However, much of theory of why the TRP works is based upon bullshit…
/r/TheRedPill28/03/14 10:01 PM
8

Gotta justify shit with those mental acrobatics. lol
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 04:53 PM
1

Ohh didn't see that. I don't know what he'd think of polyamory or swinging. Honestly a true polyamorous lifestyle seems almost impossible to have in a society such as ours. It would be difficult to get to know and trust a "tribe" worth of people well enough to swap partners have orgies ect. I don't even know. Can always work on the ole FFM threesome though. :D
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 04:46 PM
1

No I really did type "NOT" (give advice) if you look at the original sentence. The sentence structure just made it seem like I was going to say the opposite. lol.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 03:34 PM
1

Yeah insanity levels and denial is reaching critical mass. I don't even when people talk about health anymore. Its like people pick up a magazine at the store and read 5 weird weight loss tips and then assume they are now a fucking nutritionist, dietictian and obesity researcher. Shit makes me crazy.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 03:22 PM
1

Thats what I said. He did a good job of NOT giving advice. That was not a good way to write a sentence though.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 03:18 PM
1

Care to explain this "science" to me with sources and information? Sex at Dawn devotes several chapters to this specific issue with sources and very convincing arguments. I really enjoyed it. I highly recommend it and you check it out and see for yourself! I read it on a kindle app for like 9$.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 12:59 AM
4

"a little over weight but in good shape, diabetic but it's well controlled." Lesson here is don't fuck up your health and get ED from making bad lifestyle choices. He is obviously in denial about how bad his health is. If your a type 2 diabetic you seriously fucked up your health. If you were a woman would you want to put up with a man who has ED because he couldn't be bothered to eat less junk food or work out every once in a while? The red pill gives shit to women who get fat and then have the…
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 12:54 AM
1

I agree. He did a good job of not trying to make any practical recommendations based off all this reasoning. It was just kind of monogamy is difficult shrug this is why.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 12:50 AM
1

I thought it was a cool idea, that in our ancestral environment our sperm fight so that we don't have too.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 12:47 AM
1

That's not the argument of the book. That is perhaps a takeaway point or tangent of it though. If you read the book we might be able to discuss it better. all I am getting from you is you don't like it for some vague unexplained reason.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 12:40 AM
0

Just because it's not TRP doesnt mean its automatically feminism. Believe whatever you want man.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 12:13 AM
1

Noone said you needed to live in a cave to reap the benefits of understanding ancestral nature.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 12:08 AM
8

I just read this book. Very solid and eye opening. Most of the criticism of it comes from people who are sputtering irrational arguments and have a vested interest in the monogamy paradigm. They're some interesting contrast with some of TRP philosophies. TRP's seem to advocate soft harems. While Sex at Dawn seems to outline promiscuity of both sexes as a the natural human form. The core argument of the book applied to TRP is, Women are hypergamous whores as a result of the social changes because…
/r/TheRedPill24/03/14 04:32 PM
1

Don' t do as so many others have done and underestimate the importance of diet as well. Eating well will improve your mood and lessen your anxiety, both of which come across as confidence. Also if you happen to be trying to lose weight or get a six pack, remember weight loss and abs are made in the kitchen, not the gym. Clothing is a little more complicated. It is extremely context driven information. Clothing depends on the situation, type of culture, and the type of woman you are looking to at…
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 07:52 AM
2

I'm guessing, the jealousy at its root is because he is able to get away with more beta type behaviors due to his better looks? You've got to take it for what it is. He has a higher physical attraction than you and is able to get away with more stuff. I would think this sort of effect is often the result of cultural conditioning, where we see good looking men in movies, tv ect. and we simply associate alpha qualities with good looks of the leading man . The best way to deal with it, is not to su…
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 02:18 AM
3

To be honest it almost sounds like you are trying to psychologically project the TRP version of a Beta onto him so you can feel better about yourself. Once people develop these broad ideologies they become a hammer and everything begins to look like a nail. fact is you have a few examples of "possible beta" behavior in a very incomplete picture. By your assessment that he is an 8 on the attractiveness scale I think you are viewing him as better looking than yourself. Is there some jealousy invol…
/r/TheRedPill08/03/14 09:09 PM
1

I understand what your saying. It is just not the right question to ask. Most hunter gatherer cultures practiced various forms of polygyny. Trying to apply all this to sexual competition in agricultural societies further distorted by the massive changes of the Industrial revolution is just ridiculous. This sort of reasoning is a lot of speculative nonsense.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/14 09:50 AM
14

" But we are disproportionately descended from polygynous men, because polygynous men invariably have more children than monogamous men. So most of us are descended from polygynous men (and, disproportionately, from highly successful polygynous men with a large number of wives), only a few of us are descended from monogamous men, and none of us are descended from mateless men. So polygyny remains a significant part of human nature." Fuck people that have no background with biology and anthropolo…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/14 08:13 PM
1

No kidding. My passion is environmental issues and energy. I don't even think about clicking on r/environment or r/energy because people are just screaming their biases at each other without a shred of critical thinking. I sometimes find the idea that chemicals are building up in the environment slowly and steadily making everyone gradually retarded, really compelling, it's weird.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/14 06:22 AM
2

Be the type of engineer that is not afraid to get their hands dirty and you will be fine.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 11:20 PM
16

No kidding. Monogamy is a cultural construct. The more sex you have the more you realize how difficult LTR are. The more your eyes are open to human nature.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 08:43 PM
1

This economic realism is true and has been true for agricultural societies. Due my background in Anthropology and Human Evolutionary History I disagree that this is a result of woman's innate genetic based motives. The games and organizational changes cause by densely populated sedentary civilizations have created this fucked up game, rather than amplified it. Good points.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 01:49 AM
1

Is that too bizzare for you, that idea people would have sex just for mutual pleasure rather than for manipulationm or gain?
/r/TheRedPill21/02/14 03:37 PM
1

Maybe group fitness wasn't the best link to share. Basically the idea is that if Eusociality or inclusive fitness was nonsense then ant's shouldn't exist. Communally raised children and concealed ovulation both make a potent recipe for altruist group behaviors. This is more controversial than it should be because we live in the West where individualism is the "end all be all." "The existence of sterile castes of ants tormented Charles Darwin as he was formulating his Theory of Natural Selection,…
/r/TheRedPill21/02/14 05:44 AM
2

I understand. This sort of subject can be really controversial and personal to people and so its really easy to find misinformation as people get so invested in a particular outcome. I like TRP quite a bit as a model for thinking about sexuality in my own relationships. However, the theory behind it has some really questionable ideas when it comes to explaining, why these things work. Viewing women as "stuck this way due to biology" is kinda dangerous and verges on dehumanizing them. Also, the i…
/r/TheRedPill21/02/14 04:36 AM
0

Care to link me information to this debunking? It's pretty clear in most anthropological literature that hunter gatherer children were communally raised? I get the feeling you will respond hostility to anything that's not red pill philosophy. You probably see anything that is not red pill as "feminist propaganda" or are not willing to do the critical thinking of identifying it for what it really is. That might take effort
/r/TheRedPill21/02/14 02:09 AM
0

What would be a good name for a woman who is a sexual purist, liberated from social constructs of exchanging sex?
/r/TheRedPill21/02/14 01:14 AM
1

When you read literature like "Sex at Dawn" or "Sperm Wars" you would see that the "women need male support to raise a child" idea is bad reasoning. Many of these bad pseudo-evolutionary arguments circulate which aren't very accurate. Hunter Gatherer children were communally raised so you can't project the "nuclear family unit," which is an artifact of agriculture, onto a non-agricultural past. Children were raised by a community of up to 150 individuals, the whole "tribe". Monogamy was non-exis…
/r/TheRedPill21/02/14 12:20 AM
2

Ahem, brother. It's almost like the possibility of transforming a whore into a unicorn is found in a small demographic of somewhat open-minded middle class semi-educated women or certain foreign women. Spinning plates in a certain sense becomes tedious and unrewarding after a while though, mostly due to the fact people move away and drift apart so easily in our fucked up society.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 08:45 PM
7

"you're giving me everything I need already so I don't need to fuck you to get what I want out of you." Whores, cultural programming has created whores out of so many good women. In a woman's mind, arousal and sex is not allowed to be as simplistic as it is. Tacked on to the front is a set of pre-conditions gleaned from culture, think Disney movies. Women are taught to use sex to get things like: emotional validation, time, resources, or favors. Thus when men enter LTR and Marriage they have giv…
/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 08:10 PM
10

This is exactly what I've tried to do in my own LTR. You got to run some communist 1984 level fucking propaganda techniques to break through the mold. You have to tear away the Disney princess social programming and get deep down to the human being inside. Once they can embrace their sexuality for pleasure rather than a method of exchange/manipulation only then you have partly created a Unicorn. You are also battling with the propaganda they see everyday on videos, internet, TV, and in their soc…
/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 07:46 PM
-2

This is silly, your talking about whores. Whores use sex as a method of exchange and manipulation, your using slut as a cheap whore. Sluts are women who don't associate sex with any emotional connection or "trying to get something", just pleasure.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 07:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter