TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

RTSR_Shuckle Archive

View 0 posts and 37 comments by RTSR_Shuckle on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm tired of these Day 1 dumbfuck 'rebuttals' of the MRM... Antifeminism is a key part of the Men's Movement, but is by no means the entirety of it. How do we fix the legal injustices againt Men in divorce courts, family courts, domestic violence, etc without first throwing out the exisiting faulty laws? Y'know, the laws that are faulty because they're based on feminist theories and doctrines, which themselves are based on outright falsehoods, half-truths, selective focus only women's 'lived exp…
/r/MensRights04/07/20 01:47 PM
3

Seriously, fuck off with the tone policing. Most everyone in this sub is polite and civil, and those rare few who genuinely say racist or sexist shit get downvoted heavily.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 03:56 PM
2

TL;DR on Youtube has done a series of videos thoroughly rebutting the pink tax hypothesis. If you have limited time, please check the first link. https://youtu.be/8HEr8zmVEZQ https://youtu.be/cUJiQCupaFc https://youtu.be/0xVkUBAUQhA https://youtu.be/yclMr8BUjjs IMO these are quite good analyses, not Youtube anti-feminist smoothbrain shoutfests.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 12:18 PM
37

Funny how they find it creepy that men (in general) find youthful women sexually attractive, but don't ever think twice about how women use makeup to neotenise themselves and put men into a parent-ified position of protection and provision. There are 2 parties to this transaction, and the buyer isn't at fault for buying what the seller willingly sells.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 02:47 PM
1

If you actually believe the historic opression narrative and grant it as a given fact, you've already ceded too much ground and might as well give up the debate.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 08:46 AM
1

Yup, I'm with you there mate. That's why, even if all divorce law and family courts were magically fixed overnight, I still think marriage would be a raw deal for any man. I personally see MGTOW as the 'personal' aspect, and Men's Rights as the 'political' aspect. My philosophy is that I know I'm a high-quality man, and that it's not my loss if women (or blue-pill men, for that matter) fail to recognise this. Still, I understand how soul-crushing it can be before you reconcile yourself to realit…
/r/MensRights06/04/20 05:27 PM
1

I'd say ine aspect of it is so they can keep telling themselves that they're a good person by at least appearing to care. However, they don't realise how much of a responsibility it actually is to have someone confide in you with their deepest thoughts and fears.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 01:54 PM
1

If you care about him at all, you'll convince him not to get married
/r/MensRights28/01/20 09:49 AM
5

Believe it was Sally Miller Gearhart, though she's hardly the only genocidal second-waver
/r/MensRights22/01/20 10:25 PM
4

I smell a Jewish conspiracy coming around the corner anytime soon...
/r/MensRights13/01/20 12:10 AM
1

I find it to be the case that when someone says something like this, they have no real evidence putside of just asserting it to be true. Usually references are made to patriarvhy being the root cause, and the incident also serving as evidence in support of patriarchy. So, the options (most often) are NO evidence or circular reasoning to try and justify the bigotry
/r/MensRights25/11/19 02:32 PM
5

What?! I'm an MRA. I'm merely stating that a position/ viewpoint being perceived as 'extremist' doesn't make it incorrect. Truth above all else It's often seen as extremist to be anti-feminist, or to explain the truth behind the 'wage gap', or even to have basic empathy for men in some circles. Are any of these wrong? We have solid evidence to back up most MRA talking points, so they're not wrong factually. Are any of these positions extreme? Depends who you ask, showing how meaningless it is to…
/r/MensRights25/11/19 12:00 AM
0

The MRM is extremist, in that many aspects of it is so far outside the bounds if what is currently acceptable thought. That's not an indictment of the MRM: I'd rather base my positions on what can be shown to be true, and hold to my principles, rather than kowtow to the sensibilities of a culture that refuses to acknowledge (and often mocks) men's issues.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 08:02 PM
1

But that's only because ALL women were held back by ALL men (read patriarchy), barred from public life and confined to the sandwich mills and palaces of domestic abuse. /s
/r/MensRights07/09/19 12:46 PM
1

Even if we grant the point that it isn't mutilation (which it really is in a lot of cases), there's still the issues of personal rights. They still haven't made the case why their 'right' to take sharp objects to a child's flesh and make an irreversible 'choice' for them trumps the child's right to bodily integrity and free choice.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 02:27 PM
1

An argument for how useful God may (or may not) be is not in any way evidence for God's existence. If something can't be proven to exist, then I highly doubt that it's essential to life. I'd say that it's of utmost importance to be humble before evidence, and apportion trust based on it.
/r/MGTOW206/06/19 06:17 AM
2

Close to 100% of all things worth doing, thinking, or maintaining were (and are) products of men. I take no credit for the amazing feats of these people, just making the point that men have done a lot for everyone throughout all of history. Ingratitude of the highest order
/r/MensRights04/06/19 08:35 AM
1

Not sure how many times it had to be said, but feminism is about advocating for the rights of women (saying nothing about responsibility). That's only ever advocating for equality IF women can be demonstrably shown to be disavdantaged in the specific domain that the pro-women activism is being conducted. I'd personally say that equality will never be possible because of human gynocentric tendencies/inclinations.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 09:31 PM
1

Then they ask us why men haven't been making as much noise as they have on the whole Alabama abortion issue... It's almost like Feminism and its associated tactics are purposefully designed to continuously put men in no-win situations. Only way to win is to not play the game, gents.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 03:47 PM
9

The other 40% better wise up quickly. It's never a problem until it gets you or someone you know...
/r/MensRights20/05/19 08:39 AM
1

A tiny grain of sand added to the mountain of evidence that feminism is based on projection. The authoritarian tendencies and abject cruelty they accuse 'The Patriarchy' of is just a reflection of their own pathologies.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 04:56 PM
2

The world exists as it is, regardless of how you choose to perceive. If you don't like what people say on this, investigate their claims. If they tirn out to be true, the optimal response is to accept it.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 12:58 PM
1

Might be worth checking how much you value your principles if a few mean words (that weren't directed specifically at you) cause you to give them up. Just a thought
/r/MensRights17/05/19 11:00 AM
2

What is a 'real feminist', and how are you defining Feminism?
/r/MensRights16/05/19 11:27 AM
2

Just another example of how 'patriarchy' and gynocentrism go hand-in-hand. I don't think it's ever been in the interest of most men to prioritise and favour other men over women.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 09:14 PM
1

Brings to mind Hitchens' razor: that which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. You got some decent evidence that even a serious minority of this sub think this way?
/r/MensRights12/05/19 09:15 PM
2

I don't think the answer is to give men control over what the woman can/can't do. Rather, it should be about changing how men are held responsible in various situations. As an absolute minimum, it'd be great if male victims of rape didn't have to pay child support to their rapist (however rare/common that might be)
/r/MensRights11/05/19 08:17 PM
9

Sure, totally with you. It's just some thinking in terms of a risk matrix (Probability on one axis, Impact on the other). Guess the point was that, because it happens more frequently than we're commonly told, the problem is worse than usually presented.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 04:04 PM
33

I think the Youtuber TL;DR has done some good analysis of this, and concluded that the '2%' figure for false rape accusations is pretty much arsewater. Link: https://youtu.be/-zvnB-BTNbU The section relevant to the 2% figure is roughly from 7:00 to 15:00. Would highly recommend watching the full video if time permits. Edit: linked video, and rough timestamp
/r/MensRights08/05/19 03:48 PM
8

Loaded questions, if ever I saw them...
/r/MensRights07/05/19 05:09 PM
27

Goes without saying that we should do away with the expectation that men live to serve women and 'the greater good'. That being said, Bettina is a great human being who does excellent work helping men and women. It's a shame it's come to this.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 06:18 PM
10

Fairer sex, my arse. Gynocentrism sure is a powerful drug.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 04:52 PM
1

What, because I expect the same standards of decency from women as I do for men?
/r/MensRights19/04/19 07:07 PM
7

Could start with some of Karen Straughan's (GirlWritesWhat) videos on Youtube. Or look into a couple of books by Peter Wright. Would also suggest 'The Privileged Sex' by Martin Van Creveld.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 01:36 PM
3

I'm sorry, but if you hit someone, expect them to also hit you. Worried about them being bigger than you? Tough shit; don't expect someone to have more restraint because you weren't born with a Y chromosome
/r/MensRights07/04/19 12:36 PM
11

If we learn anything doing what we do, it should be that you can't 'educate' someone who already knows the truth, but insists on forgoing it in favour of ideologically driven deception
/r/MensRights05/04/19 09:50 AM
3

Book I found most useful in putting many of the issues together in one place was 'Not guilty' by David Thomas. Was written in 1992, but reads like it was written yesterday
/r/MensRights25/03/19 03:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter