| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | What do you guys think about Sadia Khan?What if person X done more than 99% of other people in the past 10 years, and still gets cheated? That's why psychology is not really a science. You can't measure for instance "how many things a person done to another person" How do you measure it? In electron volts? In brain activity? In physical activity? The amount of times X said I love you? What if person X said I love you once in a year, but another person's 500 "love word" carries less "mental energy" than the one who said only once in a … | /r/ExRedPill | 11/11/25 05:28 AM |
| 1 | What do you guys think about Sadia Khan?So basically no matter how objectively we can measure data, Field X can still be declared as science, just because there are errors in measurements in other fields as well? In that case, if I dreamwalk in the middle of a room and gather some data and derive conclusions from it then I could most definitely call it a scientific field if enough predictions, erm I mean conclusions are created. | /r/ExRedPill | 11/11/25 05:20 AM |
| 1 | What do you guys think about Sadia Khan?99% philosophy, 1% objectivity. You can get away with this in this field, but not elsewhere | /r/ExRedPill | 11/11/25 05:10 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter