| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 109 | In the world of actual high value people, is the red pill truly valid? | RaccoonDazzling7208 | /r/RedPillWomen | 18/09/25 12:02 AM | |
| 24 | The red pill ideology does not hold true for most high status individuals | Debate | RaccoonDazzling7208 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 18/09/25 11:53 PM |
| 0 | Which woman would a man select? | Discussion | RaccoonDazzling7208 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/10/25 03:01 PM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| – | The red pill ideology does not hold true for most high status individualsThink of a Stanford or Columbia educated business executive who is putting a family together. He is not going to walk into a Starbucks and bring the girl behind the counter to his parents. He would get looked down on for that, and there are social pressures for him to find someone of similar social class. The wealthy and well educated businessman would much rather bring home the woman who studied law or medicine than the Starbucks chick, most of the time. These people do not think the way RP sug… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/09/25 03:59 PM |
| – | The red pill ideology does not hold true for most high status individualsI’ve seen lots of other studies that suggest assortative mating is the norm even among higher income people. That’s been a common trend for pretty much all of history. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.104.5.348 https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w20271/w20271.pdf https://www.nber.org/digest/may14/assortative-mating-and-income-inequality Your study is specifically about “mathematically precocious individuals” and I have no clue what that means but on a broad scale, thi… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/09/25 03:56 PM |
| – | The red pill ideology does not hold true for most high status individualsLet’s think about Harvey’s secretary for a second. She has a dating past. She makes a lot of money, considerably more than other secretaries in the same firm. She is independent and strong willed, often challenging Harvey on decisions. Harvey relies on her for her execution and intelligence. Does this sound like an ideal RP woman to you? She is not a trad wife type of woman and Harvey didn’t choose her for being submissive. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/09/25 03:47 PM |
| 1 | The red pill ideology does not hold true for most high status individualsI think one leads to the other. A person who deals with competent and educated women on a regular basis is not usually going to develop the type of thinking that RP espouses. And that will influence their relationship dynamics too. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/09/25 04:14 AM |
| 6 | The red pill ideology does not hold true for most high status individualsRelationship and non-relationship dynamics don’t exist in a vacuum. My broader statement prior to that is that these types of men are never going for the women the RP says they are. They don’t view women that way in their daily lives and aren’t going to look for those criteria in romance either. The Ivy League graduate executive at a top company will never bring home a girl that works at Starbucks just because he likes her personality. RP often cites this type of thing but it does not happen wit… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/09/25 04:11 AM |
| 1 | The red pill ideology does not hold true for most high status individualsI think broadly speaking, men want to have leadership roles in relationships. But it’s not to the extent that the RP calls it out to be. It’s not one of the primary driving factors in a relationship for these men. An executive who graduated from an Ivy League and works at a Fortune 500 company is not going to be thinking of submission as his first criterium in a wife. He is likely marrying a woman working in a high powered firm, not some random chick who works at McDonald’s that fits the redpill… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/09/25 04:08 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter