TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Radiant-Pop8684 Archive

View 0 posts and 15 comments by Radiant-Pop8684 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-20

That's a fair retort, just this sub's selective outrage and minimization of much more relevant, pressing issues (and in many cases, blatant rejection of reality) in an effort to elevate men's rights activism is why this movement has stayed fringe. There needs to be way more acknowledgement of accepted statistics (like I'm sorry but women are not sexually assaulting men more than the other way around), proven biological differences between the sexes that lead to one-sided vulnerabilities (most me…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 10:07 PM
1

Are you indian?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 09:55 PM
-12

you're largely wrong but this is likely due to the massive online crackdown on incel spaces given the very real violence that arose.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 09:54 PM
-14

Have you found stats on male suicide / specific root causes for individuals? Genuinely want to educate myself on this issue
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 09:53 PM
-56

I was in college when Elliot Roger shot up that college town after posting several videos where he single handedly incited an entire generation of "incels" (a new term back then). These femosphere spaces are toxic and gross but dont even scratch the surface of the actual damage and violence that incel/manosphere/red pill communities have committed against women and ironically other men. So why are we spending time acting concerned over something that has shown no evidence of inflicting actual bo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 08:56 PM
1

And here’s the data you’re denying exists: https://www.uber.com/us/en/about/reports/us-safety-report/
/r/MensRights05/06/26 12:37 AM
1

Do you not recognize that your argument is almost nonsensical ? Has no logical or factual basis? Like holy shit I keep trying to understand what you wrote when you said female passengers are in less danger with male drivers than male passengers are but you fail to apply any logical reasoning or frankly coherence to your claim. Genuinely worried for you (Also how are men going to solve the issue of being victims of… men)
/r/MensRights05/06/26 12:35 AM
1

I remember when I was teenager there was a this special cab service in my city called Homobile that was exclusively gay cab drivers meant to serve other LGBT passengers. My friends and I were shitheads and took advantage of it (we were not gay) until Homobile eventually caught on and banned us. Saw zero problem with the service existing and honestly felt a little bad about taking advantage of it while we could. Also found it well within their rights to blacklist some straight opportunistic teena…
/r/MensRights05/06/26 12:28 AM
2

The data says the overwhelming majority of victims 2021-2022 were female passengers.. Initially you said the data can’t be trusted, and now you’re citing said data while stating the opposite of what it reflects I think we’re going in circles, have a nice day (and happy men’s mental health awareness month!)
/r/MensRights04/06/26 01:42 PM
6

I’m confused, you’re saying the danger for male passengers comes from male drivers? doesn’t that kind of support why women would want a female-only option in the first place? Or am I missing something
/r/MensRights04/06/26 01:32 PM
5

Which study are you referring to? The only figures I keep seeing cited are from Uber’s own safety reports. I’d love to read something different honestly, especially given how much male assault gets underreported, just not sure where else to look for rideshare-specific data? Also to be clear, are you proposing that men be given the same service ie men only uber rides? Not sure what this would solve
/r/MensRights04/06/26 01:21 PM
3

Calling it a ‘distinction without a difference’ only works if the two scenarios are actually equivalent. The contextual history behind racial segregation vs. a gender accommodation made in response to documented crimes aren’t the same thing, even if both involve discrimination. You can oppose female-only Ubers without that comparison
/r/MensRights04/06/26 12:57 PM
3

Im not fully understanding the segregation comparison, especially since uber isn’t public transportation Seems like a response to recent class action lawsuits against Uber for driver-on-rider assault unfortunately I just think opposing something like this justifying it with a (arguably offensive) false equivalency doesn’t help the movement
/r/MensRights04/06/26 12:42 PM
0

I don’t understand the beef with female only Ubers? How does this hurt men
/r/MensRights04/06/26 12:30 PM
-4

Oh please
/r/MensRights04/06/26 08:18 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter