TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Raeko Archive

View 0 posts and 44 comments by Raeko on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

No, but when I am trying to get someone on my side I usually give them articles (from newspapers or scientific journals, depending on the situation) or Wikipedia articles. I do not link people to biased blog posts when trying to educate them about something, and I'd advise you to do the same if you want people to take you seriously when you talk with them.
/r/seduction03/02/13 10:28 PM
0

If you'd like to give me some unbiased sources I would be much more interested.
/r/seduction03/02/13 09:01 PM
2

I am not generalizing at all, I am a very avid reader of r/seduction ;) This was just such a glaring example that I couldn't help but point it out. It is just so extremely obviously misogynistic and any casual reader could see that even if they know nothing about seduction, feminism, or any other subject. People browsing this place for the first time will see this post and it's intense misogyny and they won't even need to do any work; yupp, at least some r/seduction posters are misogynistic and …
/r/seduction03/02/13 07:29 PM
-1

I can't speak for other instances but in your post's case, it's misogynistic because it is a sweeping generalization of all women that is very insulting. You are saying that women are not capable of rational thought and compare us to rodents. When you make a generalization about women that implies that we are somehow inferior to men, that is misogynistic. This can be applied when people are talking about individual women, too, but that can sometimes be harder to spot (due to the obvious reason t…
/r/seduction03/02/13 05:11 PM
-12

Wow, this is one of the most sexist pieces of trash I've ever read. If you don't want r/seduction to be labelled as misogynistic, you should probably stop posting/upvoting misogynistic content like this.
/r/seduction03/02/13 04:51 PM
1

I agree. Taking groceries out of someone's hand? Really?
/r/seduction27/10/12 08:27 PM
0

Yes, if you act violently toward other people (sociopaths often do). If you use people as objects you're usually willing to rape or otherwise physically assault people which would obviously hold legal consequences.
/r/seduction02/08/12 04:49 AM
3

Excuse me? This poster was pretty obviously making a joke about being a sociopath.
/r/seduction02/08/12 04:47 AM
3

That makes you a sociopath, I think (somebody with a bit more knowledge in this subject want to confirm?)
/r/seduction01/08/12 09:13 PM
1

I have not used any racist terminology in any posts I've made, nor have I defended the use of such terms. puaCurveBall defended the use of sexist terms, and even if he is not a sexist himself, he is promoting sexism by promoting this language (though I can't see why anyone who is not a sexist would promote sexist language).
/r/seduction01/08/12 08:47 PM
5

You can remind everyone that women are people by the words you choose to use! IMO even changing something as simple as "female" or "target" to "woman" implies that you are seeing her as a person rather than an object or specimen to study.
/r/seduction01/08/12 08:45 PM
2

You're right, that statement is purely anecdotal. Perhaps I should have been more clear: I personally have never met a feminist who wasn't sex-positive, and I know from my knowledge of feminism in general that allowing women to have control over their own bodies is a pretty central component. Feminism's stance on sex is "as long as everybody consents, it's all good". I think the reason those people would be upset at you participating in the seduction community is not the idea itself, but the way…
/r/seduction01/08/12 07:01 PM
1

Yes, a few people have brought up the point that a lot of people sort of "grow out of" this mindset once they actually start interacting with people in the real world and better understand how social interaction works. I think that this is definitely a possibility.
/r/seduction01/08/12 06:34 PM
9

I did not ignore anything and thanked him for the response. Your post contributes nothing to the discussion.
/r/seduction01/08/12 06:14 PM
-2

I have never met a real feminist who is not sex-positive. That means that they believe women have the right to have just as much or as little sex as they personally want to. Using sexist language is being sexist. If puaCurveBall is not a sexist person, then why does he promote sexist ideas by using these terms?
/r/seduction01/08/12 06:00 PM
2

I have already answered this question twice here and here.
/r/seduction01/08/12 05:49 PM
-1

People who judge other people on "worthiness" (usually based on skills, assets, etc) are not objectifying them. Objectifying occurs when you DON'T take any personal qualities into account and see someone as just an object (using someone just for their looks counts, even though that is OK to do sometimes when both parties consent).
/r/seduction01/08/12 05:46 PM
3

I only respond with a feminist viewpoint when it is appropriate. People should care because sexism affects everyone. As a woman, when someone objectifies women or makes a frightening joke or whatever, I feel threatened personally and it makes me uncomfortable. This doesn't happen as often on the internet unless someone says something truly horrible, but even minor "jokes" and things like that are often indicative of a larger sexist attitude. By letting people know "Hey, that thing you just said …
/r/seduction01/08/12 05:33 PM
1

I answered MonkeySteriods above^ I subscribe because I am interested in the community. I find that there is a lot of sexism floating around, and sexism/gender issues are a bit of a passion of mine. I also enjoy explaining feminist concepts to people, so when a thread like this pops up every now and again I am able to shed some light onto the sexism issues and (hopefully) help some people out.
/r/seduction01/08/12 05:28 PM
7

We first thought we were doing something deterministic, where our actions get a guaranteed response, like tweaking inanimate objects. This is exactly it right here. This attitude is rampant on this subreddit. Thanks for the well thought out response, and I hope that some of these posters grow out of it as you seem to have done.
/r/seduction01/08/12 05:24 PM
1

I guess I enjoy it, haha. I am always open and willing to give a feminist perspective and explain feminist ideas to anyone who asks for it. If a question like this pops up and I am able to answer it, I think it's for the best! A lot of people just never think about these things and me giving a simple explanation can sometimes clarify things for them.
/r/seduction01/08/12 05:21 PM
4

I am a woman and a feminist! I am subscribed to this subreddit and saw this thread on the front page. I usually do not post.
/r/seduction01/08/12 04:54 PM
5

If that was really what the subreddit is about, why is it called "seduction"? Why isn't it called "self-improvement" or "life-changers" or something? Stop pretending that this subreddit isn't about seduction, and that it doesn't attract people who are interested in picking up women.
/r/seduction01/08/12 04:47 PM
8

Why did I even bother responding to this thread when this shining example speaks more than I ever could? This, /r/seduction users, is why people think your subreddit is sexist.
/r/seduction01/08/12 04:21 PM
1

Well, that is a personal characteristic that you have. I don't think it's fair to assume that all people who use "females" instead of "women" aren't native English speakers. Most people who use it either have thinly veiled sexist attitudes or just don't realize what they are doing because they'd never thought about it. As for yourself, now you know that "women" is a better term!
/r/seduction01/08/12 04:09 PM
-8

I'm not sexist I somehow have trouble believing that :)
/r/seduction01/08/12 04:04 PM
9

Err maybe not, but the words you choose to use can display whether you are sexist/not sexist. In the case of /r/seduction, the generally accepted terms display a generally sexist attitude.
/r/seduction01/08/12 03:59 PM
9

Except it's not if there is a person behind those behaviours. If you are talking about people/behaviours in a broad general sense you'd be right, but in "field reports" or things like that where you are talking about a specific person, that is not true.
/r/seduction01/08/12 03:33 PM
65

I am going to give you an honest, feminist response. The idea that /r/seduction is sexist has to do with subtle things like language and the general mindset of many posters here. The basic idea is that a lot of what you guys say and how you say it implies that you do not view women as people, but as objects that are your's to control and use as you desire. This mindset manifests itself in many ways. Using the word "females" instead of "women" or "ladies" and discussing "field reports" gives off …
/r/seduction01/08/12 02:31 PM
4

I am also a feminist and only expect people to hold doors for other people to prevent them from slamming on someone. The above poster implied that feminist women expect this sort of treatment above other people, which is not true.
/r/seduction04/07/12 08:19 PM
3

No real feminist would ever believe something like that ;) Women who do not understand or subscribe to feminist viewpoints might expect this, though.
/r/seduction04/07/12 06:08 PM
2

Nice Guys (tm) are about more than just unrequited love. Being in a one-sided love sucks for anyone, man or woman, nice or not, and this isn't what's being talked about when people talk about Nice Guys (tm). Nice Guys (tm) feel that they are entitled to women simply for being nice. They get angry and butthurt when women they are interested in aren't interested in them. They assume that "women only like assholes" when the reality is that women are free to make their own choices and just because s…
/r/MensRights09/05/12 06:38 PM
7

Wow. The world may not revolve around anyone's feelings, but implying that women should not have feelings while being harassed and threatened is a whole new level of fucked up. Though I guess it is easier to just see a pair of boobs than it is to see an actual person, so I totally get where you're coming from, dickweed.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 03:30 PM
6

FYI I'm a female, but I'm not sure it really applies to what I'm about to post. It is completely within your right to want partners that match your particular standards. If you don't want to be with a partner who has had many other partners, don't be! That being said, I think you will be limiting yourself and potentially missing out on a lot of great people for really no reason. As long as you practice safe sex and are generally smart about it, there's no real reason to be worried about how many…
/r/seduction03/12/11 08:37 PM
0

I suppose I misunderstood which sort of touch you were arguing for and mistook it for the "arm grab" sort of touch like the OP commenter used. High fives, light taps to get attention, etc are of course OK. My apologies. However, I still might take issue with you suggesting this sort of touch to everyone for exactly the reason you outlined in your last paragraph I think many men feel that if they approach a woman, they feel they deserve the woman's attraction, and then become creepy when she just…
/r/seduction15/11/11 06:42 PM
0

I of course am generalizing my experience to a degree, but I don't think it is uncommon at all based on my conversations with friends/other women. I just do not see how it is appropriate to do something like this before knowing what her standards are. It seems massively disrespectful to me.
/r/seduction15/11/11 06:22 PM
0

I'm not talking about a tap to get my attention. I am talking about a prolonged touch/grab in a crowded setting where it is difficult to get away without being forceful. Also I think maybe growing up as a sex object to men has given me some issues, you're right :) I developed a thick skin at an early age so that I never had to deal with people like you, maybe it has made me miss out on some more "human" interactions like a small touch.
/r/seduction15/11/11 06:18 PM
-1

Touching my arm/shoulder or pushing me to get out of the way, or squeezing by me is different. I am talking about when guys approach me, usually when I am dancing or waiting at a bar, and touch my waist/arm/butt/or put their arm around me. I already know you're probably an introvert who likes to read and shit, maybe you've had a couple boyfriends (maybe not), but your supposed experiences don't reflect the general experiences of most people. This is not true at all. I am a very active person soc…
/r/seduction15/11/11 06:09 PM
0

I'm sure it is for you, but you're not the norm in this case. No, it definitely is the norm. Most people are just too polite to say anything. Unless they are super drunk or you are really hot, most people do not want you touching them before you've spoken.
/r/seduction15/11/11 05:40 PM
-1

If you don't like to be touched right away, that is completely acceptable, for you How would you know, though? You're just waltzing right up to me and touching me. You don't know if I like it or not. You don't ask me, you don't read me, you just do it. I am not alone in this. Many women (many people) are uncomfortable with unknown people touching them. It is rude to assume otherwise.
/r/seduction15/11/11 05:38 PM
-1

Anytime somebody touches me, I think "back off" and move away accordingly. Anytime somebody talks to me, I either think "back off" and respond accordingly, or listen to what they have to say.
/r/seduction15/11/11 12:30 PM
1

If you have been talking to them and getting vibes that this sort of contact would be OK, then it is OK. Walking up to people who you've never spoken with before and touching them uninvited is uncomfortable and inappropriate.
/r/seduction15/11/11 06:13 AM
2

Shouldn't touch people without their permission. Talking to random people, fine. Physical contact is different.
/r/seduction15/11/11 03:31 AM
0

Maybe if she is stepping back and looking uncomfortable it's because she is uncomfortable. Take that as a cue to back off, whether or not a white knight appears. Pulling hair and saying disgusting things would hurt your "game" more than any white knight would.
/r/seduction23/03/11 06:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter