TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Raenryong Archive

View 4 posts and 211 comments by Raenryong on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Goddamn patriarchy, always privileging men!
/r/MensRights19/09/18 05:01 PM
9

The question is: where does it stop? Women are generally weaker than men, physically. Women typically have more powerful socially unless you're looking at the upper echelon of society. Must we factor in the height and weight differentials of the perpetrators too, as they contribute to physical power? Should we sentence a short man less harshly than a tall one? A skinny woman less harshly than a fat one? If you stab a muscular/fat person, you are likely to cause less damage than to a weak/skinny …
/r/MensRights04/08/18 11:04 PM
51

Yup, does anyone give a shit about some guy's life story if he ends up sexually assaulting a woman? No, because nothing justifies that.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 04:09 PM
239

Especially since, if the sexes were swapped, she would be absolutely up in arms about it - and definitely not promoting it as a funny story.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 04:01 PM
968

She's an unapologetic piece of shit. For all of those coming at me rn, listen to the lyrics of Warrior and maybe you’ll have more compassion for someone who made a simple mistake. Of all people I know about sexual abuse. You don’t have to educate me,” Demi tweeted. “So sorry if anyone was offended.” Demi also added, “people DON’T know my full story..”
/r/MensRights03/06/18 03:31 PM
10

No such thing as institutional discrimination against men btw, patriarchy and male privilege btw
/r/MensRights01/05/18 09:21 AM
3

Or "seduced". While a man "rape"s, "molest"s, etc. Note here that I am criticising the tone used on female->male rape, not suggesting male->female rape is villified.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 08:03 PM
29

Mutilation or maiming is an act of physical injury that degrades the appearance or function of any living body.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 09:22 PM
6

Why is anti-feminism a bad thing? Is a Conservative society undesirable because it may be anti-liberal?
/r/MensRights10/11/15 06:14 PM
30

A-levels are a form of exam in the UK taken at age ~18, from which universities decide whether to accept you or not.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 08:27 AM
1

Newer cods allow you to play as female soldiers and so does planetside 2!
/r/MensRights29/11/14 01:07 PM
4

My interpretation was that he thought there was an error in the mathematics of the poster above him and was mocking it.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 07:45 PM
8

(63-37)/37 = 70% increase
/r/MensRights27/03/14 02:33 PM
14

That second quote...........
/r/MensRights09/12/13 12:01 AM
2

Me too! Was Torquay Boys' Grammar School for me. I would imagine it does depend very much on the environment, yeah.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 08:30 PM
7

It's weird - I went to an all boys' school and it was very relaxed. Very chilled out, no real hierarchy (different cliques but none were "higher" than the other) - in fact, competitiveness etc only developed in the last two years of the school where we were suddenly mixed with the adjacent all girls' school.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 07:50 PM
19

MALE POWER FANTASY COMPLETELY DIFFERENT WOMEN DO NOT FIND ADONIS TYPE MEN ATTRACTIVE (just ignore the cover of any romance novel ever)
/r/MensRights13/10/13 04:30 AM
16

This is exactly the kind of content. This isn't "a woman was harsh to me", this is discrimination against men on a very fundamental level - not to mention destructive to victims of sexual assault/rape by a woman who are still not taken seriously.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 04:22 PM
15

I just wanted to say that you're an amazing person for suffering such a traumatic experience but not allowing it to destroy you.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 09:50 PM
6

The argument made is that male sexualisation is different - a muscular man is a "power fantasy" for men, and therefore it is not as damaging as female sexualisation which is for men to degrade etc.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 07:18 PM
2

Subconsciously, maybe, but they argue as if having headmates is a perfectly normal way of being. It's scary. That being said, I will feel very ignorant if proper research later proves that this is actually a genuine phenomenon - though I doubt it.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 12:34 AM
2

I had to look that up to respond to this comment and so have learned something new today - thanks! And no, I don't think it's quite the same idea. Headmates are supposed to be these things that "are" as opposed to things you supposedly consciously create through force of will (assuming my understanding of the word is correct)! To use a semi relevant analogy, it's the difference between homosexuality being inherent or a choice. They argue the former with respect to headmates.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 12:26 AM
6

Disclaimer: you may feel better about humanity before learning the meaning of these terms Transethnicity is when you feel you belong to another ethnicity but your own, eg if I as a British guy thought I was actually Japanese. Otherkin are those who believe that they are not entirely human, whether in body or spirit. People who think they are part wolf/turtle/whatever else, and just animal spirits trapped in a human body. Headmate is when you apparently share your mind with other individuals and …
/r/MensRights26/04/13 08:51 PM
2

Fair enough. It's so sad though! Tall women can be so elegant, and those legs... height is honestly no deal to me as long as you're not too much taller or shorter than me that it becomes impractical. I suppose women are just more vocal about their height requirements!
/r/MensRights16/03/13 03:32 AM
1

I think you would have more experience in the area (assuming you are female); just speaking for myself and my friends, tall women are not a problem. The problem would be feeling like we would be dismissed outright unless we were giants.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 02:45 AM
1

Even if they are the ones approaching?
/r/MensRights16/03/13 02:18 AM
1

I have rarely seen any kind of dislike towards tall women by men. Men just are less likely to hit on you because they assume that, like most women, you very vocally want someone significantly taller than yourself.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 12:22 AM
2

If you are shorter than the desired height, how are you supposed to "work towards it?" Women can work towards an ideal. Men cannot.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 09:19 PM
5

I'm glad that it hasn't made you bitter towards women (as I could sympathise if it did); it is a very human tendency to try to associate things with patterns and trends, eg "an x did this, therefore all xs do this"! Truth of the matter is that there are simply good and shitty people in the world. This is regardless of sex, although of course a truly shitty person can abuse the "perks" of their sex.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 05:24 AM
6

Speaking as a guy who's been raped twice, and been to a lot of counseling for it, it sucks, yeah. Jesus christ man, I hope you're alright :x (this is not sarcasm in any way as this is horrific, though I'm aware it can be read as such due to societal perceptions etc).
/r/MensRights16/02/13 04:31 AM
6

"war on women" has to be the most melodramatic, exaggerated and misattributed phrase I have ever seen in the mainstream.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:15 AM
15

Extreme feminists have a habit of misusing and "watering down" the meaning of certain words. "Rape" has now been used even to describe approaching a woman who did not want to be approached (see: that dumb elevator incident), and now "terrorism" for arguing on the internet and spreading information. It's just a play for an emotional response.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 12:18 PM
1

Equal shares is best - neither of you should feel like you must pay for the other's company. You wouldn't accept an invite if you were not interested in the other person.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 06:14 PM
12

I don't think there's anything "woman hating" about his post though... he's not saying that women are awful people, nor that they are all rapists, or anything like that - just that societal attitudes tend to overlook or even joke about the possibility of a female rapist.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 08:24 PM
6

I've often wondered why women hate PUA so much. The fact that it is so unquestionably effective and able to take advantage of their contradictory sexual dynamics says a lot more about their flaws than the flaws of the PUAs doing the flirting.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 10:07 PM
8

You mean kinda like this?
/r/MensRights04/12/12 09:23 PM
12

They argue that Men's Rights groups and male-safe spaces are going to be homophobic and transphobic (with no evidence of this other than speculation). But but femininity is a positive thing and masculinity is a negative thing, based on ... patriarchy! Everything masculine is bad and must be tempered by the feminine. Go equality! (yes, my above post is dripping in sarcasm).
/r/MensRights04/12/12 09:15 PM
6

People seem to have this odd idea that "wanting to have sex with someone" and "liking and respecting someone" to be mutually exclusive principles. Furthermore, they seem to have this idea that all male sexuality is for the purpose of pleasure and not to seek affection from a likeminded partner. It's frustrating!
/r/MensRights30/11/12 06:07 PM
2

Excellent article - sums up the contradictory nature of sexual dynamics, for both men and women.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 06:05 PM
5

Men's issues are constantly put down as either not existing (which is untrue), not mattering because they're not as big as women's issues (untrue on both parts), or not mattering because they're all caused by other men (untrue on both parts, but the first part, if it were true, would be much less relevant than they think). This is right on the money. The primary difference I've found between the two movements is that the MRM acknowledges that women do face difficulties in their everyday lives, e…
/r/MensRights30/11/12 01:12 AM
12

Simply because the idea is that no guy will talk to a girl without ulterior motives. It's really telling that a man talking to a woman because he finds her attractive is seen as this negative, "ulterior" event. I'm not criticising your choice of language because it perfectly describes the situation: you're basically made to feel guilty for even approaching a woman.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 01:07 AM
3

Why are men unable to be raped? How do you define rape?
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:48 PM
3

Well, you are saying that a soul destroying, violent and abhorrent act cannot happen to you if you are a man by a woman. If your reasoning is along the lines of "men always want it/always are the aggressors" etc, I'm not surprised. Imagine telling a woman that she couldn't be raped.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 09:36 PM
6

Furthermore, somewhere where men can safely talk about things which make them feel vulnerable (powerlessness with women, difficulty with defining and projecting masculinity - whether straight or otherwise (and for that matter, not having a rhetoric whereby masculinity is demonised leveled against you)), without being judged for being "weak" or being told to "man up" or anything similar.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 12:33 AM
-1

The very fact that the clarification is necessary shows just how ingrained it is even in those of us who don't follow feminist doctrine to be very careful not to possibly offend a woman. It's kinda scary just how often I, at least, have to clarify myself or else risk being branded a misogynist and that's the end of it.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 12:30 AM
1

From the article, which you may argue is biased, for instance: Jobs. Give job recruiters two invented resumes that have been carefully matched except for the candidates' height, as one study did in 1969. Fully 72% of the time, the taller man is "hired". And when they are hired, they tend also to earn rather more:
/r/MensRights23/11/12 07:45 AM
3

If it only extended to bad treatment sexually, you could just let the problem rectify itself when shorter men all commit suicide or fail to breed, and that arguably would be fine since you cannot force the opposite sex to like you. However, since it affects other things in society and discrimination against men as a whole, it should be challenged. Hell, I'd love to challenge it on the sexual front too, but ultimately nobody cares about short men. It would be better should they cease to exist (an…
/r/MensRights23/11/12 07:30 AM
2

You don't even have to recognise the MRM specifically; simply to acknowledge that men exist as a constituency group is a start.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 07:43 PM
4

Men have all of the power in this society, clearly.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 01:06 PM
20

Ah, the usual "men must impress women and treat them royally, but women are already good enough for any man just because they are women" idea.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 08:32 PM
5

Someone who consistently checks all of your personal messages is invading your privacy, and it is important men recognise it as such. A man who did this would rightfully be labeled as controlling, yet there isn't a defined attitude regarding women who do it (and often it's defended by the logical fallacy "if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about") - this changes this. I just think this campaign is a big step in the right direction. Admitting that men can be victims and that w…
/r/MensRights30/10/12 01:22 AM
3

Look through this thread and just look at how many responses are along the lines of "oh my god, that's me" - and this is among a group who are probably more open than most to the possibility of being potential victims of domestic abuse as men. Now imagine how many men in their day to day lives see this, stop, and think: "hold on... that's what she's doing to me". This is an extremely positive event.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 01:10 AM
4

I like to compare feminism to religions; it's kind of like when a religion tells you that you have original sin (or whatever) and only by following their teachings will you be saved.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 09:10 AM
5

A. "why are men always hitting on women? Objectification! They just want to get in our pants!" B. "why aren't these men hitting on women? What creeps! They obviously can't interact with normal women."
/r/MensRights13/10/12 12:52 AM
3

I agree. "It's only cutting off a bit of [useless] skin!" - how often do you hear this said?
/r/MensRights08/10/12 04:50 PM
23

"He only wants to get in my pants! Why do I keep being objectified?"
/r/MensRights05/10/12 05:51 AM
14

Religion poisons everything.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 05:50 AM
11

Feminists as a whole are among the most hateful groups I've ever had the displeasure of encountering. It's amazing that they can continue to call others hateful.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:28 PM
2

There is one truth in this flawed source. Women are instilled with far too much fear, and the result can be paranoia and too much suspicion. Men, while suffering more from violent crime, are instilled with too little fear and the result can be complacency. Honestly, the thing which annoys me most is how so often women will say "at least you can walk alone at night" or "at least you feel safe walking <insert place> alone". Why? A. anyone who wants to violently attack me isn't looking for a fair f…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:00 PM
6

That is not the only point being made. There is distinct "male blaming" here - and that is why objections are being raised.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 08:49 PM
9

Some animals are more equal than others.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 11:08 PM
3

Feminist response: but sexism requires power and privilege, which women don't have, and so it is impossible for a woman to be sexist against men!!
/r/MensRights29/09/12 07:01 PM
7

Absolutely this. Women learn they can often get away with anything because they can just pull the "I won't have sex with you" card. As any regular poster to here can likely confirm, even disagreeing/arguing with a woman is often enough to get you branded "misogynistic" and many men fear that such a label will interfere with their sexual prospects, and so they will endure any punishment a woman dishes out.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 11:19 AM
2

If she goes to length to post things like these as well as calling herself a "proud slut" shows she's just a total attention seeker.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 07:15 PM
7

This is where we and the feminists often differ. If an unconsenting woman is passed out drunk and you have sex with her, the majority of both feminists and MRAs will call the activity rape. However, if a consenting woman has sex with you while very drunk only to regret it later, the majority of feminists will label this as rape while the majority of MRAs will label it as just a bad experience, and not criminal (assuming no force was used etc).
/r/MensRights22/09/12 12:26 AM
13

Read as: not instantly extremely attractive to me
/r/MensRights22/09/12 12:13 AM
2

What are feminists doing to fight against this logic? I haven't seen a single thing, and if anything they treat men as predatory and undesirable. My meaning is that the idea of "patriarchy" which feminists use to wave away any opposing viewpoints and which they use to imply men's problems aren't significant (and that they can't be discriminated against etc) is invented by feminism. Of course, I'm always open to evidence opposing what I've just said. A single thing feminism has done for men and n…
/r/MensRights15/09/12 11:56 PM
13

I don't mean to alienate anyone here, but this is the same kind of logic which several religions use. "You have original sin by virtue of x religion, therefore you must atone" "You have privilege/discrimination by virtue of patriarchy, therefore you must atone" Granted the poster doesn't deal with the latter, but it is in my opinion the same idea. Feminism in this case creates and perpetuates the images above; the genesis of its own problem.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 01:01 PM
7

"It's so infuriating to me because there are women who work very hard for decades to create a system where domestic violence is serious business, where people respond to it in a serious way; when women use it as a weapon and not a shield, it's offensive to the system."
/r/MensRights14/09/12 12:58 PM
2

I think a large part of science is accurate collection and representation of data, sooooo ...
/r/MensRights13/09/12 02:47 PM
2

Although this doesn't help your situation at the moment, take some comfort in the fact that you did someone a favour who greatly appreciates it. How other people want to interpret it is their problem.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 11:34 AM
2

There's still a large double standard in writing these articles. and her dislikes (short men ... ) Do you think an article would be published which said and his dislikes (small breasts ... ) or and his dislikes (fat women ... ) ~ there is still a large double standard at play here.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 12:05 PM
28

Contrary to the claims of feminists, the age old “traditional double standard” in which women are unfairly punished for promiscuity is no longer in observed on college campuses. It turns out men are just as likely as women to be snubbed by their classmates for sleeping around. Another couple of good quotes.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 12:03 PM
3

Yes, I found that very amusing myself. While atheism is not the same as antitheism, it is logical that discussions regarding antitheism would be a part of a gathering of atheists. However, a casual glance at atheismplus shows that it is operating the same as SRS - links to many posts which don't hold women in the regard they want, discussing how to deal with men within atheism and otherwise, etc. And yes, they are forbidden to criticise religion. It IS basically SRS.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 08:24 AM
2

It's against subreddit rules to link to shitredditsays (SRS), but take a casual glance at their front page and then look at /r/atheismplus - you will notice many similarities.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 08:22 AM
103

It is VERY important that this video and the case gains traction in the media. It showcases three very important things: Women lie about rape/sexual assault Women are able to use threats of branding someone a rapist/sexual assaulter to manipulate people and get what they want Inequality in legal systems; even with video evidence the man's case is not considered strong enough by the police to pursue, but just a woman's word is enough to start a witch-hunt. This is crucially important to undermini…
/r/MensRights08/09/12 10:34 PM
14

I've been following the so-called movement since it was first thought of as I found it curious; it quickly became obvious it was just somewhere else feminism wanted to poison. On one of the first days, there was a post discussing mods on the sub. Many SRS members were elected and discussed, and the owners of the subreddit said that they wanted "SRS-style banning" because (paraphrasing) "we don't want to have to deal with the problem of eliminating male privilege from atheism when some people don…
/r/MensRights08/09/12 10:31 PM
1

Last post by the OP: I'm going to have to agree with you that my "Cyber-Life" had some part of this. So a little backstory here, Wife and I have been together for seven years, married for 3-1/2. When we met, and were dating, we were both devout Christians. A few years ago, I started questioning my faith. We talked about it a few times, but usually we left the discussion at "I'm not sure what I believe any more." Eventually I made the decision that I no longer thought that the God in the Bible ex…
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:55 PM
1

It gets worse. Basically people have decided the man is a neglectful addict who doesn't pay enough attention to his wife and therefore the destruction was justified because she finally snapped and it was his fault. I wish I was making this up.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 05:11 PM
2

Just have counterarguments ready for the three most common ripostes (that I receive anyway); Men don't have issues because they have privilege All male problems are problems created by the patriarchy, and therefore this somehow means they don't deserve help (even if we presume the "patriarchy" to be true Women's issues are more important because they have been discriminated against in the past These come up almost every single time, I swear. Prepare for people to be really close-minded too.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 06:50 AM
1

'm not claiming that all men are running a shadowy conspiracy that is trying to subjugate women. I know that the tiny minority of men in power don't represent all men. The point is, women are vastly underrepresented because women are viewed as inferior and are therefore considered inferior to men when it comes to running the country. The over-representation of men tells us about social trends and expectations, in the same way that MRAs claim that the over-representation of men in prison tells us…
/r/MensRights02/09/12 11:00 PM
5

Having an awkward social interaction happens to everyone, no matter how socially adept you are, especially with the opposite sex when they do not make their intentions clear (as in this case: she never explicitly says "no" but instead leads him on to a point). Rape is a disgusting, abhorrent and vile act and requires someone to completely dehumanise their victim and forcibly take power over them and their body. There is quite a jump between these two things!
/r/MensRights01/09/12 09:27 PM
7

They make the argument that porn leads to more objectification and such of women, but I would like to make the opposite argument. Consider a situation where this so-called objectification mostly happens (it also happens for the guys but obviously they ignore that, and for the sake of this argument I'll focus solely on the women) - the nightclub/casual hookup scene. A large percentage of both sexes are involved in "hookup culture"; casual exchanges of sex for whatever reason. In order to release …
/r/MensRights01/09/12 09:21 PM
7

I agree with your reasons for posting this - it shows the worrying mindset of society. If it had just ended with her telling him that she probably wasn't into him and he was going too far - sucks for him but at least he (probably) knows. The problem is that people make the jump from "creepy" => threatening => potential sexual abuser => rapist REALLY QUICKLY when he just misinterpreted social cues (and the woman in this case wasn't particularly forthcoming either, making it an easy misinterpretat…
/r/MensRights01/09/12 09:10 PM
1

With respect to #5, I think my point could be better illustrated if we use another example; "women aren't good at sport". Women may not be as good as men at sport in general, but there are still talented female players of almost any sport. What I'm trying to say is that I don't think the writer of the article is saying "all women are funny/ or as funny/funnier than men", just that the idea that they're not funny as a whole is flawed. I know many PC gamers, both male and female. Bear in mind I'm …
/r/MensRights31/08/12 05:49 AM
1

5 wasn't saying that women were as funny as men, just that they were funny. I know some very amusing women. 9 Women aren't anywhere near as scarce in gaming as you might expect. I play a lot of online games and never have any trouble finding female players to chat or play with. It just may not be apparent because gender isn't obvious at a glance in most online situations. 10 I agree is pretty weird...
/r/MensRights31/08/12 05:18 AM
10

I trust they'll be seeking to take action against the woman whose actions were magnitudes worse than Destiny's too. ... I can't even say that with a straight face. Of course they aren't.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 06:27 PM
15

I'm a follower of the SC2 scene, and this just disgusts me. Every thread about this is disgusting... yes, Destiny was out of line in showing pictures to a couple of his friends - no contest here. Yet the girl then shows compromising pictures of him to tens of thousands of people and guess who receives all of the blame? The girl goes straight into her victim mode (which isn't to say she ISN'T a victim, but she's both victim and perpetrator in this series of events). Last time I checked, if someon…
/r/MensRights30/08/12 06:15 PM
1

Where is that a quote from? That sounds... so delusional.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 06:04 PM
22

When someone asks why we dislike the more dangerous forms of Feminism, this is why; their ability and will to aggressively censor information in order to present their own version of reality, twisted to meet their agenda.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 04:58 PM
1

I can't speak to know the majority of women as I obviously don't, but within the subset of women I do know, most are genuinely good people who don't attempt to abuse the system. I won't deny that feminism and feminist politicians give women the leeway to abuse it, but I know of only a few women (I don't tend to associate with these) who would take advantage of the situation.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 02:22 AM
6

The majority of women would have a problem with this article or find it amusing in a kind of "oh, this is ridiculous" kind of way. Just because it's written to attempt to "white knight" women's favour doesn't mean they believe a word it says on the whole.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 11:19 PM
1

It's time to play "common anti-male shaming tactics bingo"! *Charge of Irascibility (Code Red) *Charge of Rationalization (Code Purple) – The Sour Grapes Charge *Charge of Misogyny (Code Black) *Charge of Unattractiveness (Code Tan) – The Ugly Tan Charge *Threat of Withheld Affection (Code Pink) – The Pink Whip I like this already. Saves me a lot of typing. I'm also confused as to where all of the Wow. You really hate women, don't you? Or do you just hate women who happen to have an opinion that…
/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:48 PM
2

But let me guess - you're completely against all forms of female genital mutilation, including (comparatively) mild forms (eg removal of the clitoral hood)? If so, you are nothing but a socialised mindless drone. If not, you are a barbarian. It's not looking good either way.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:37 PM
2

Hitchens vs a Jewish Rabbi on the exact argument (they didn't even cry; can't be too bad etc) It's on a debate vs religion, but still extremely relevant given it deals with one of the common arguments for circumcision (religious freedom/"it doesn't hurt/they don't remember it).
/r/MensRights24/08/12 09:29 PM
6

As a physics student, this was wonderful.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 06:01 PM
22

I like the way you worded this. "Reluctantly providing" is perfect - even the language dealing with consensual sex suggests some kind of submission of power, "give it up to him" etc. The running dialog in society too is that a man should EXPECT rejection; in fact, the idea of a man being rejected by one or many women is played as comedy in many forms of entertainment, sometimes where the woman rejects him as harshly as possible - the more humiliating, the more entertaining. It's acceptable. Howe…
/r/MensRights24/08/12 05:21 PM
3

It's SRS, I wouldn't expect a consistent argument or anything above spouting mindless vitriol :p
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:02 AM
23

We should turn this into a game of bingo... pretty sure I would've won several times with some of the posts I've had addressed in response to me.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 09:01 PM
1

(Former) girlfriend is blocking the doorway, at least to the point where you would have to be prepared to use force to get past. She has already proven she is more than willing to use force. Do you go in after your phone, risking more physical violence and perhaps having to use some force of your own, or do you ask and then leave? Seems less like cowardice and more like common sense. Let the authorities handle this. Getting involved in what could very well turn into a physical altercation is not…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 02:04 PM
8

But women also molest children. Even if it's a small % of total children, it's still a %. Therefore women shouldn't be able to sit near unknown children either.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 08:59 PM
13

Many things combined throughout most of my life, but eventually I just got sick of how society essentially treats me as disposable and inferior to women. Even posts on reddit highlight this fact. The man always has to be "good enough" for a woman. The woman is good enough for anybody by virtue of simply existing. As a man, romantically and otherwise, my existence is not considered worthwhile until I have accomplished something noteworthy. An extremely common reaction to criticising a woman for h…
/r/MensRights10/08/12 04:35 AM
2

No such thing as female privileges. Male privilege is definitely real though. /s
/r/MensRights09/08/12 09:47 AM
3

I was banned too, for asking for evidence supporting their claim that extremist MRAs are attempting to deny women the right to vote and work.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 05:27 PM
1

There are two lines of argument you can use. The first, and stronger of the two, relies on the other person having an objective mind, and that is the strong argument that male sexual autonomy is to be respected -- that an infant should not have decisions regarding such an important part of their anatomy made for them. The second argument is only really useful if you have someone who is arguing purely emotionally/anecdotally, as appears to be the case in the OP. If she complains about smegma or s…
/r/MensRights06/08/12 06:16 PM
6

This is true. Women produce more smegma (and other things...) than men, so any woman complaining about such is implying that nobody should want her genitals either.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 06:12 PM
5

I both agree and disagree with the above. One of the common criticisms directed towards men's rights is that it's a movement solely for the benefit of "bitter neckbeards who can't attract women" etc so to have members clearly outside that demographic is beneficial.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 08:28 PM
26

This is the thing which irks me most of all. Discussions with feminists who claim their movement to be about equality devolve into the same lines of logic frequently: Feminism is about equality Women have been disadvantaged in the past and therefore should have the most work done correcting their inequality Men's issues are less important than women's issues Men can wait until all of women's issues are solved before their needs are addressed It shocks me that people just blindly go along with th…
/r/MensRights04/08/12 08:26 PM
10

So if I start advocating feminism, my penis is going to get larger and I'll get better in bed? In seriousness, it is terrible that we are in an allegedly free society where it is not possible to criticise a particular group for fear of repercussions.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 06:26 PM
3

I like the idea, but fear that feminists/white knights will deface/remove the poster before it gains any traction.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 01:33 PM
7

Manipulative behaviour undermines the humanity of the victim, yes. One of the aims of the MRM is to challenge the macho and destructive gender stereotyping which seeks to separate men from their emotions, and portrays them as perpetrators always and victims never. Male manipulation tactics are vilified hugely in society, even with less manipulative things like PUA material. Yet female manipulation tactics (shit-tests, getting free drinks, using their sexuality to escape from traffic violations, …
/r/MensRights30/07/12 04:41 PM
2

Literally woman can get past looks and love uglier men because he has balls. Women use looks as a "gateway" just like men do. I'm also worried about this; Complaining about this is equal to woman complaining that all we care about is looks, which is true and also natural and healthy. We're not all shallow, for the record.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 04:36 PM
3

Except women also care massively about looks, despite all of the propaganda you may have absorbed portraying women as virtuous and deep.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 04:01 PM
7

Or maybe women should treat men as people, just as is constantly shoved down our throats to treat women as people?
/r/MensRights30/07/12 04:00 PM
5

The problem is that to a lot of men, female acceptance is a huge deal. Feminism is "politically correct"... outside of the few radicals who'll yell at you for holding a door open and such (never experienced this in real life so I don't know how common it is), it's a very safe stand to have. Standing for something like men's rights makes at least some women have a very explosive and negative reaction towards you, let alone men. To those without strong self-esteem which is not based around the opi…
/r/MensRights28/07/12 05:07 PM
7

You're raping a woman if you find her attractive without her permission. /s This comment is NOT to be taken as though this is what happens or anything because extreme although society can be, it's not yet this extreme. This is the impression some of the more crazy sources that get posted here give sometimes though...
/r/MensRights26/07/12 05:32 AM
0

I could be entirely wrong and I haven't really thought about the point I'm about to make but I think the other thing wrong is the public announcement of it. If an incredibly beautiful woman, objectively speaking, was to murder a load of innocent people, I wouldn't say a word about her physical attractiveness. I dunno, it would just feel like... not quite condoning the act she just performed, but somewhat alleviating the burden of guilt?
/r/MensRights25/07/12 04:29 PM
6

Can you imagine what would happen if they had decided violence against men was unacceptable and all enemies were women?
/r/MensRights20/07/12 12:26 PM
13

Yeah, at least you have to commit some kind of offence to be labelled a bitch, whore, slut, asshole, tool, etc. To be a creep, some woman somewhere does not approve of you existing as a sexual being. It is truly the most frustrating of all of them.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 06:18 PM
7

Almost everyone except the SRS bigots posted against her which was heartwarming to see.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 06:02 AM
1

Thank god. This means at least in this case there is no innocent man being taken down by a woman's lack of responsibility.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 05:58 AM
0

One of her final posts. I hate to sound so venomous but this woman completely disgusts me in every way. I only hope her CONSENSUAL SEX PARTNER is not hurt as a result of her abhorrent attitude and mindset.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 05:40 PM
7

The victim mentality is strong in this one.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 05:36 PM
10

All men's faults are men's and all women's faults are men's. I just summed up the article in one sentence to save people the trouble of reading it.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 01:33 AM
2

That Lucy is an amazing writer. It's funny to see the guy's comments devolve from reasoning to "patriarchy patriarchy patriarchy men are evil patriarchy"!
/r/MensRights14/07/12 04:18 PM
2

I haven't exactly read up on a lot of "rape stuff" nor thought about it, but I wouldn't let a woman I was hypothetically raping (the thought itself disgusts me) be in a position to seriously damage me (eg oral sex).
/r/MensRights14/07/12 05:16 AM
55

but women don't lie about rape, right?! EDIT: to be more constructive The problem seems to be that some women seem to perceive rape as "sex which you don't want (whether at the time or later)" rather than "sex which is forced upon you". To be fair, it's not only women who sometimes get this idea. I remember having a conversation a few years ago where the idea of marital rape popped up, and one guy immediately said in disbelief "how can that even exist? If you're married you probably want to have…
/r/MensRights13/07/12 08:21 PM
61

But now his girls won’t see him for five years and probably not even then. That’s because this judge wasn’t concerned about their welfare; he was concerned about showing Brewington, and all others who may be similarly inclined, just what kind of power family courts have. Question that at your peril. Assert your rights only if you dare. That’s the message to which two little girl’s well-being was sacrificed. A very well-written piece, especially this final paragraph.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 06:50 PM
7

Wait a minute. If you feel that this man is capable of and intending to rape someone, when he has company, is it really wise to assault them as a lone female? If he's not intending to rape someone, you just assaulted someone over making a harmless joke (one in very bad taste, but regardless). Whether the threat was genuine or not, she made a really stupid decision.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 03:43 PM
3

I don't think it's even necessary to shame their "parts"; just point out that if smegma is the problem, women produce far more than intact men. They can draw their own connections from that.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 07:31 PM
14

Ban male sexuality except from men whom they give their express permission to be sexual.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 08:37 PM
2

Number 4 cuts both ways too - the image of the tall, muscular, six-packed man is prevalent in the media and society.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 07:24 PM
5

There are no religious children. There are only religious parents. Opting to have yourself circumcised due to religious beliefs is acceptable; opting to have someone else circumcised due to you enforcing your religious beliefs is abhorrent.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 08:48 PM
-1

"You catch more bees with honey than with vinegar", or so the saying goes. We are more likely to gain support if we spread our message through means which don't have the side effect of antagonising circumcised men, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 10:18 PM
20

It is easy to forget that, amidst all of the frustration caused by anti-male feminists and such that most women are not bigoted or sexist, and are wonderful people. That being said, I am very appreciative personally of the women willing to go one step further and stand up for these issues especially when you are essentially "putting your neck out" socially at the moment by supporting MR.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 05:00 PM
12

Because the law is far more lenient towards female criminals than male criminals. An innocent male is also far more likely to be accused of performing a crime than an innocent female. This is why it is necessary to emphasise the fact that women too commit these crimes.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 04:14 PM
5

Agreed - that mentality is exactly what makes feminism so pervasive and powerful. Women generally network and group better - strength is in unity of numbers.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 04:05 PM
11

That is one of the single most disgusting quotes I have ever read in my life.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 11:24 PM
6

They held a "legal gun" to his head. There should be repercussions for this.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 01:10 PM
0

Meeting a good woman is amazing. However, you are fighting at such a frustrating disadvantage just for being male instead of female that it's perfectly understandable to avoid dating. There are only so many times women can turn you down for incredibly shallow and petty reasons (lack of height/money/social status etc) before you figure it's not worth playing roulette in hopes you get lucky.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 01:01 PM
7

Good article, but I noticed a rather nasty typo :P It seems the lack of male role models in families and communities is helping produce a lost generation of young men with worrying impacts with recent research showing that Fatherless boys are three times more likely to be suicidal and boys with a male role model are three times more likely to be depressed.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 12:03 PM
4

Excellent article and sums up many of the problems with male sexual demonisation and the extremely messed up gender and sexual dynamics present in society.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 11:39 AM
14

Well, it is said that some women like older men and can even fantasise about them at a young age. Therefore, an older man taking advantage of a younger girl is obviously not rape, just stupidity. If the reader of that article can read his own work and what I just wrote and only sees a problem in one of them, there is a problem.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 11:37 AM
8

The argument against smegma amuses me since women produce far more than intact men, yet nobody seems to complain about them...
/r/MensRights16/06/12 05:42 PM
7

This was exactly my problem for my early teenage years. I was raised by a single mother (she's a great person, but I lacked a male role model) and ended up under the impression that I was this sex-mad beast (odd since I didn't feel like one) and I was supposed to be extremely nice to women and do whatever they want so they would eventually "give in" and let me "corrupt" them, since girls don't get urges like that obviously. Lead to a lot of missed chances and awkwardness until I got over it.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 04:50 AM
5

This is ridiculous. I haven't seen the scene in question, but from the stance of a somewhat avid gamer who is fascinated and enthralled by how much games are developing into an art form, I have the following things to say: The rape does not sound like it is portrayed as a positive scenario. It is very likely portrayed as a horrific and scarring event... so before claims of "rape culture" and whatnot trivialising rape, this is clearly not the case as it is fundamentally unlikely that it would be …
/r/MensRights16/06/12 04:41 AM
4

It is a logical fallacy known as a false dichotomy, and one of the most effective as a rhetorical technique to the unobservant or unaware reader.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 12:57 AM
2

I agree entirely, but society holds men up to a far higher standard in relationships and often assumes them to be at fault.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 08:33 PM
6

Why is this being downvoted (both this post and this topic)? She or he is actively asking for information and is willing to look through it (non-blindly: there is nothing wrong with assessing the veracity of sources) and this gets downvotes?
/r/MensRights15/06/12 06:26 PM
0

I'm very much against misandry in media and in real life, but I do not feel games as a form of media are particularly discriminant against males. |The Musclebeast: Why are all men 7 foot roided up killing machines? Not all men are, but it makes sense that a very physically fit man would be very muscular. Most women in physical roles in games are slim, athletic and very toned too. |Mr Emotionless McStonefaced This varies wildly depending on what game you play, but I would say it's generally not t…
/r/MensRights15/06/12 06:24 PM
5

Implying something is fine due to traditional values is a logical fallacy.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 10:25 PM
10

Because it's a very common shaming tactic employed against anyone who speaks up against feminism or female dominance!
/r/MensRights14/06/12 03:32 PM
17

We dislike SRS because they are bigoted and sexist - not because they discuss what happens in other subreddits. Also lol at your point number 6. Goooo shaming tactics.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 03:12 PM
7

It's the usual logic. If anything goes wrong in the relationship, it is always the man's fault. A man must meet a list of requirements to be good enough for a woman, yet all she needs to do is possess a vagina. If a man cheats on a woman, he is filth. If a woman cheats on a man, it's the man's fault for not fulfilling her needs so she doesn't stray. Etc.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 03:10 PM
4

It's neither fallacious nor illogical, and I said that I didn't think it's right. It's actually a logical move if you are promoting something which you can logically conclude is a strong improvement but would otherwise be completely denied if you went through normal channels.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 07:04 PM
5

I don't think it's right as such, but at the same time I can understand the reasoning behind it.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 06:23 PM
6

Well, while I can appreciate the need for "democratic" processes, people are so indoctrinated by feminism and such that such a step may be necessary.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 04:39 PM
20

It reminds me of one of the top-rated comments in this sub. Paraphrased as "what would women know about being men?" - they are so keen to remind us that we don't know anything about being a woman, yet seem to believe they know everything about being a man because we are "simple". The ultimate stab-in-the-back being if you conform to all of their ideals for whatever reason, the same women will likely not find you attractive, and female attraction is a desirable thing for heterosexual males (obvio…
/r/MensRights12/06/12 04:38 PM
18

Wouldn't a homosexual relationship TECHNICALLY be the most masculine of all since there is no feminine party?! I'm not trying to make any kind of deep or informed point here, just light-hearted humour :)
/r/MensRights12/06/12 04:02 AM
8

As an interesting analogue, comments on pictures of men/women on Reddit go as follows; Commenting on attraction of male such as "off to ladyboners with you!" is often highly upvoted and generally accepted. If you even comment on the APPEARANCE of a female you get people talking about objectification, being "creepy" etc. People are attacked for giving compliments!
/r/MensRights12/06/12 04:00 AM
1

The ones who appear creepy through over-enthusiasm likely don't. I too was once overly enthusiastic and I cringe when I think of those days :p I certainly didn't think there was anything wrong with it at the time! As for the darker side of creepiness... I'm not sure. I don't feel any of those kind of darker impulses so I couldn't answer for that.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 08:48 PM
4

I agree entirely, and also commend you for being assertive yourself. I wonder how many missed potential great relationships/friendships are ruined by men and women being reluctant to approach? Another big issue I find is "creep"-calling. If you approach a girl in a way she does not find entirely attractive, or if you simply don't look physically appealing to her, you can then be labeled as a creep. Purely because one single woman does not find you attractive, even if your interactions were munda…
/r/MensRights09/06/12 03:26 PM
1

Tall women can be really elegant and sexy! I don't know why guys find them so intimidating; maybe it's because since I'm not tall I've never really thought of my height as an attribute, so it doesn't feel challenged at all.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 10:47 AM
1

Simply because people love to discriminate and challenge differences in each other, and height (either way) is a socially acceptable means of doing so.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 10:45 AM
4

"I'm glad you finally gave up the sand-lot routine," she wrote. "What fellow wants to get romantic with a third baseman?" (referring to a woman playing baseball) This quote annoys me a lot. It's as bad as the guys (and sometimes girls) who say that if you play games you will never find a girl, if you do <x activity> you will never be attractive etc. The least attractive thing possible is someone stifling their personality and interests just in case someone, somewhere, disapproves. Obviously this…
/r/MensRights09/06/12 10:41 AM
4

Even if you presume that men and women are completely psychologically equal in every respect, it is apparent that women would be far pickier. After all, social pressure is not on them to make the approach (ie the hardest part) and women can largely take an entirely passive role in dating (although proactivity may well be met with greater success); a passive man in the dating scene is almost doomed from the start. There is simply more demand for any single female than any single male. Now if you …
/r/MensRights09/06/12 10:34 AM
3

Desirable is fine but required I think is shallow (and many women appear to completely "stonewall" men who are not a certain height before even getting to know them - this has happened to me on a couple of occasions though these are definitely isolated incidents, and on dating sites it is shown that if you put your height as 6 foot or below, you will get dramatically less interest). The problem is that height - something which (largely) cannot be changed - is held as such a major, major factor.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 10:29 PM
7

Your group sounds like a good one, but it is easy to point to many studies showing that most women are just as shallow. Hell, there are many reddit threads enquiring about height (taller preferred) and desirable characteristics in a man (see how often tall is repeated).
/r/MensRights08/06/12 09:00 PM
15

This is why I have no sympathy whatsoever for the majority of women when they complain about looks. Not only is height the most discriminatory (and unchangeable) sexual trait in both sexes bar none, but so many women are dead set on certain heights. I'm 5'7 so not extremely short but nowhere near tall either. I walk with a strong posture so I appear taller than I actually am, but the discrimination is definitely there. Women are far more shallow than men when you consider characteristics than th…
/r/MensRights08/06/12 07:30 PM
3

Nothing to add other than to say that was an excellent post.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 07:11 PM
3

Is the penalty more severe if a man or woman abuses the system? Who does the system punish most in the first place?
/r/MensRights07/06/12 03:45 AM
3

The problem with the system is it allows "bitches" to exploit their position.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 02:40 AM
3

I would argue it's perhaps the hardest, as social behaviour is something ingrained and learned over time and there is a generation of advertisements and such working against progression.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 11:22 PM
3

That's a difficult question. I don't think there has ever been a point where "perfect" equality has been achieved (and honestly this is unrealistic when the two quantities involved are not directly equivalent) but I feel there must have been a point where male/female rights were relatively equal. I do feel that society favours women and is gynocentric at the moment and is continuing to head in that direction, although with the coverage the MRM has been receiving, this acceleration is beginning t…
/r/MensRights05/06/12 10:26 PM
5

You don't necessarily need to have a previously dominant party for one to become dominant. In a situation where both are relatively equal, neither is dominant before but it is perfectly possible for one to be dominant in the future.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 10:03 PM
4

None of us do, yet supposedly it permeates society.
/r/MensRights03/06/12 04:49 PM
16

Male privilege.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 09:55 PM
7

We shouldn't even be implying that the severity of her punishment be based on her physical attractiveness in the eyes of society, as this is one of the inherent problems granting legal favour to women.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 04:26 PM
11

Society views women as inherently worthwhile as people and men as being defined by their productivity/financial status, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 03:05 PM
7

It isn't. It's against the extra legal/social powers that women enjoy, but not women as people. If you try to post "TITS OR GTFO" or the most misogynistic joke you can think of on this subreddit, it will be downvoted to oblivion.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 05:36 PM
6

The majority of MR supporters are not misogynistic and do not dislike women. We do not like how much extra social/legal power they have, but that is completely separate from disliking them as a gender. "Invasions" only occur if there is a blatantly biased viewpoint or discussion (which is semi-common given female biases in society and Reddit).
/r/MensRights28/05/12 05:35 PM
12

Agreed. If anything, Reddit (like most places) favours women. The experiment above suggests this to a degree, and also there is large support behind anyone (especially a woman) who throws the "OMG YOU MISOGYNIST" card, even if it's thrown simply for disagreeing with them. People are also hypersensitive and willing to suppress part of their personalities and interests just in case some girl, somewhere, does not approve. tl;dr: it's basically like society.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 05:33 PM
1

Poe's Law epitomised.
/r/MensRights27/05/12 11:18 PM
3

It's moreso the fact you are essentially risking your future if you sleep with an even slightly intoxicated woman while women are "safe". It's yet another situation where the male carries all of the risk.
/r/MensRights27/05/12 11:13 PM
4

This is true; however, if she decides at a later date that she suddenly regrets it and reports it as rape, you're finished unless you have it recorded. There's not so much consent as there is "hope the woman you're sleeping with doesn't decide to destroy you". It's very one-sided.
/r/MensRights27/05/12 11:09 PM
8

But men can't be raped, silly. They always want sex with any girl ever and never regret any encounters! /s
/r/MensRights27/05/12 11:04 PM
4

The horrible difference being that these some women (I agree wholeheartedly that it is a disgusting minority) are able to do far worse things than men can while remaining legal. They should not have this power. EDIT: I should refine my argument since "legal" is misleading there. "Largely free of legal consequences" would be the better phrase.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 07:22 PM
6

Yup, sexual dynamics and society are both incredibly screwed up. Both sides suffer in different ways.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 06:43 PM
5

Standing up against a movement which has such social and political power along with such easy and dismissive methods of shaming you and undermining your position is worthy of praise.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 11:26 AM
9

And yet people wonder why men don't report incidences of female-on-male violence. Being cast as the perpetrator when you are in fact the victim must be one of the most dehumanising experiences possible.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 05:27 PM
11

That is exactly how I interpreted it too ... then thought "they can't really have missed the contradiction in what they just said, could they?"...
/r/MensRights04/05/12 06:21 PM
1

Let me know when the human race is depleted enough in number that your second point is relevant.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 01:11 PM
3

If a girl likes me enough to go on a date she should WANT to pay for my dinner. No?
/r/MensRights29/04/12 12:41 AM
2

Link? I fail to see how removing something which is rife with sensory nervous tissue does not reduce sensitivity.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 11:30 PM
5

Some infants die or are permanently damaged as a result of the procedure. The male is also left with less sexual sensitivity. When avoiding meningitis is as simple as washing yourself regularly in the vast majority of cases, you have a point.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 08:47 PM
5

Well, it's lucky we mutilate our children rather than spending five minutes describing (or showing) how to clean themselves then.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 06:40 PM
11

And this prevailing attitude that arousal is somehow a choice is what causes a lot of traumatic damage to rape victims typically - the idea that since they were physically aroused or even orgasmed that they "enjoyed" being raped, and therefore feel guilt because of it. People really need to be educated about this. Attraction isn't a choice, arousal isn't a choice.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 04:08 PM
3

I agree that all of these things do happen. I also say that women often consider their sexuality more valuable than the man's sexuality; that theirs is a gift to be given and the man's a right (eg how a man is degraded if he doesn't want to have sex at any given time), and women often present themselves like this (eg some of the logic used for men paying for the first date is that he must "pay for her company" - presumably you wouldn't go out with someone whom you have no interest in, so why is …
/r/MensRights22/04/12 03:48 AM
3

In which case you have somewhat objectified some men, although I don't think you're a bad person as your intentions do not seem malign at all. It is just impossible to defend the stance that men should pay for dates (even with the condition that they ask for it), yet many people conform to it because it's hammered into us by outdated notions of chivalry.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 02:26 AM
2

Equal arrangement being something like both deciding to go out somewhere - do you consistently expect him to pay or anything? Obviously at some point hopefully both partners will pay for the other. A first date is another example - do you at least offer to split? I'm not accusing you of anything, merely wondering.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 01:36 AM
1

Have you ever felt or even insisted that a man should pay for you in an otherwise equal arrangement? If so, you are explicitly objectifying him whether you intend to or not. There is a chance this may not apply however. The reason men like to "touch" you is to avoid the dreaded "friend zone". Not stopping when you are clearly uncomfortable or tell them to stop is obviously out of line though.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 01:16 AM
3

Watch out, we've got a badass over here.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 02:20 AM
3

That video always makes my blood boil. White knights, manginas, call them what you will - they are an enslaved type of man, completely unaware of the shackles around their minds. They are extreme feminism's ultimate weapon.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 02:16 AM
2

I would disagree, although I also agree with your latter point to a certain extent. This subreddit is a beacon of injustice towards men in society and law, and so I feel examples of this are suitable here.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 03:56 PM
9

Well, although some representatives of the movement are pushing for equality, many are committed solely to the advancement of women. A key example is the "rape culture" one, which is essentially demonising a presumably innocent man just for being a man. So long as the movement portrays men as rapists-to-be and overprivileged (see the scholarship example, 45% vs 55% is hardly worth considering without additional information; also, the one where a man claims he needs feminism to be a real man - im…
/r/MensRights13/04/12 03:55 PM
6

And suddenly, women there will complain that no men are interested in them.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 11:27 PM
2

This is indeed true, but if you are forced to pay for someone to increase your chances of sleeping with them, may as well go all of the way and hire an escort/prostitute and increase that chance to 100%.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 11:57 PM
1

How many assumptions can you make in a single string of posts?
/r/MensRights11/04/12 11:28 PM
1

I am livid with anger. How could you tell?
/r/MensRights06/04/12 05:15 PM
3

You don't sound very intelligent.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 01:06 PM
2

You're right. Inserting foreign objects into somebody's body while they're sleeping isn't violation. /s
/r/MensRights16/03/12 03:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter