| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | is promising things for sex then not delivering really "sexual assault"?No the answer would be “it depends.” The rest of your answer states a rule. But your conclusion is not justified by the rule alone. You’d have to assume facts to reach that conclusion. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 25/12/21 11:43 PM |
| -3 | is promising things for sex then not delivering really "sexual assault"?You’re mistaken. Imagine the following: “jack killed Jill. Is it murder?” There’s no way to answer that. He might have murdered her. But it might only be homicide. You’re confusing hypotheticals with burdens of proof. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 25/12/21 11:27 PM |
| -43 | is promising things for sex then not delivering really "sexual assault"?There’s not enough facts to make that determination. It’s a fact sensitive inquiry. Presenting it with no facts, anyone who takes a position one way or the other is simply projecting their set of values on the hypo. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 25/12/21 06:16 PM |
| -46 | is promising things for sex then not delivering really "sexual assault"?Which actors? Can you name one? Otherwise this is a bare hypothetical without any facts needed to answer the question. You’re asking a legal/moral question. You’re also claiming this is a v common thing, but w/o naming someone, it just looks like bias and imagination | /r/PussyPassDenied | 25/12/21 06:04 PM |
| 15 | is promising things for sex then not delivering really "sexual assault"?This just a hypothetical. Who are you thinking of? Surely not Weinstein… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 25/12/21 05:54 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter