TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ragark Archive

View 0 posts and 198 comments by Ragark on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

And the problem isn't that job posting are "50$ hr for men, $37.5 for women." It's that women are assumed to be less competent, so they are less likely to get the better pay jobs, which in total averages out to women making less than men.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/20 12:04 AM
1

Why does she have to be a saint? Last I checked, love didn't operate on a point buy system. "Says here you're overweight, but your personality is amazing"
/r/MGTOW24/11/18 06:24 AM
6

By either being attracted to such features, or more likely caring about someone beyond their physical features.
/r/MGTOW24/11/18 05:59 AM
12

Probably "I love this woman so much I want her to be a part of my life forever"
/r/MGTOW24/11/18 05:48 AM
1

Yes because you shit on the discussion and then strutted around like you "won." Like I said, "Cringe"
/r/MensRights29/05/18 07:46 PM
6

Cringe
/r/MensRights27/05/18 06:34 PM
1

The thing that seems missing to me is that simply sharing cultural aspects like clothes and food isn't inherently bad, it's the taking of another culture. The costume thing is different because the examples contapoints use wasn't "I'm wearing traditional native clothes" it's "I'm going as an indian!" which is caricature and not related to stealing aspects of that culture. Headdresses used in that aspect aren't cultural appropriation, but caricature. But when they're used in things like photoshoo…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 09:46 PM
1

So we've broken culture down to the things we wear, the things we think, and the things we do?
/r/MensRights16/05/18 09:12 PM
1

Is there any example of your definition of cultural appropriation that isn't about intellectual theft? Native headdresses? They're important, even sacred, in some native cultures and then someone will wear one for a photoshoot. and yes, that is an example of intellectual theft. It was an analogy that cultural appropriation is different from cultural intermingling because it requires a level of inequality in the relationship, like the difference between a friend and a professor. What's the signif…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 08:38 PM
1

I didn't mean we can't talk because we disagree on an issue or that I thought you were in bad faith, I said that because I think the issue we had in mind is different. This second post is much more in line with us having different stances on the same issue, so I think we can have a discussion. 1: As a useful concept, yes. 2-3: yes, stereotyping/making fun of another culture is fundamentally different from taking ideas from that culture(with modifiers). 4: Less about money although that is a good…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 08:00 PM
1

After reading all this, I don't think we're going to have a very good discussion. I think we're on different wavelengths when it comes to this issue. I came here to defend the idea of cultural appropriation being a thing worth paying attention to and that your understanding of it (cultural appropriation is when you partake in another culture) was incorrect. But I think from your POV you're taking this as a culture war stance against SJWs. As I see it, you don't really care for cultural appropria…
/r/MensRights16/05/18 06:56 PM
2

Here's a video that's pretty good. It's 10 minutes long, but I really like contrapoints. The first 6 minutes is mostly sifting cultural appropriation from caricature and one other issue, but after that goes into an example of cultural appropriation.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 05:51 PM
1

I figured.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 04:53 PM
1

Okay, so then why do you think the transatlantic slave trade is so prominent?
/r/MensRights16/05/18 04:49 PM
3

I'm not subscribed and I see it occasionally.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 04:41 PM
0

Sure buddy
/r/MensRights16/05/18 04:40 PM
1

Imo, that's cause the transatlantic is more relevant to us, and also most of the work over it is in english. The slavery of the ancient world isn't as pertinent.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 04:39 PM
1

Yeah, I realized after that wasn't the right word. I meant literate with universities and such so that our slavery and its effects on our country would be recorded and studied.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 04:29 PM
1

And I've been flooded by alt-righters. But I'm going to assume neither of us has been screenshoted with someone famous and whose exchange would get shared by thousands.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:58 PM
1

Maybe that's cause America was a developed nation that had slavery and the civil war it caused has been a large aspect of it's history and culture and the focus of a huge amount of scholarly research. Also your search results would be biased towards english sources. Try better search words like "modern slavery" before losing your cool.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:53 PM
2

Yeah, I'm sure this image being spread around the internet and laughed at by thousands would not lead to her getting swamped by trolls and assholes at all. It's definitely cause she's just a snowflake.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:48 PM
1

That is the least charitable interpretation of cultural appropriation I've ever heard.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:45 PM
-49

Well I didn't know that. And I never said anything about the other sub, so I don't know why you want a statement on that.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/17 04:26 PM
-44

No, your flair is what makes me think that.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/17 04:15 PM
-104

A flair saying "But I Dindu Nuffin" is kinda a tip off.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/17 04:14 PM
-256

For some reason, I really doubt you care about people being racist.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/17 04:06 PM
-4

People have been complaining that women's rights have really been about female superiority since abraham lincolns presidency. Why should you be taken seriously?
/r/MensRights14/03/17 04:12 PM
-3

Oh bullshit, feminism and women's rights has been decried as being about female superiority since Lincoln's presidency. Fucking Lincoln.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 11:22 PM
1

You know what I mean, an explicit someone is obviously getting raped video, with audio. Basically perfect evidence. Now, would you still claim not guilty?
/r/MensRights26/05/14 01:18 AM
1

So would you? If it's a pretty cut and dry, hd camera with audio of the women saying "no," would you still stand?
/r/MensRights26/05/14 12:42 AM
6

no matter the evidence Even the evidence is damning, like the rape was caught on camera?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 06:06 PM
1

Exceptions. If even 1% of the human race is like that, that is still 70 million people.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 04:48 PM
-3

Ask a man to get on his knees, hands behind his back, and try to touch his nose to the ground. He can't, he'll slam face first into the ground. Women on the other hand, can do this. Not sure how it applies to clothes though, I thought it had more to do with different densities of bone at different places.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 07:59 PM
0

But why do you think it's great? I didn't say it was great, just it was the best explanation I could find. I will say I went back and found it and I got it a bit off. It's not that men are the default, it's that our point of view is the default. Take it how you will, it's just what got the concept to make a bit of sense in my head.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 09:02 PM
-4

The best explanation of Patriarchy I've gotten isn't "for men by men" like everyone around here seems to think, it's "The societal idea that men are the default".
/r/MensRights12/02/14 04:24 PM
3

Because socialism is a economic ideology. You can have fairly hands off government with a socialist economy. Hell, socialist invented anarchy.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 08:08 PM
6

Yeah, I replied to the other how if Orwell is talking about word stretching, it's more than likely he just means Stalinist.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 10:43 PM
6

I know, but if you read a book and assume it's an allegory to r/atheism, and it was written by an atheist, it might not actually be about r/atheism. What I mean is that Orwell had a hatred for Stalinist, due to the USSR leaving the Spanish out to dry. With Animal farm about the revolution, 1984 was about life under a large, oppressive state (I.E USSR). So assuming it was about the twisting of words of socialist seems to be stretching. If the book is about the stretching of words, he more than li…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 10:29 PM
18

But, Orwell was a socialist...
/r/MensRights01/10/13 09:31 PM
2

Speciest.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 12:55 AM
2

That's my question. If they were, wouldn't that first statement be correct?
/r/MensRights03/08/13 12:40 AM
13

That's probably actually correct, if women were discouraged from the arts and made to focus on homelife?
/r/MensRights03/08/13 12:11 AM
1

thousands of people Who? I'm not clear on who you're talking about. It's that no feminist has ever been able to come up with any in recent times I just said they acknowledge this...?
/r/MensRights15/07/13 04:29 PM
2

None, but there is a difference in being unable to come up with any, and acknowledging there isn't any.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 01:46 AM
1

None, but there is a difference in being unable to come up with any, and acknowledging there isn't any.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 01:45 AM
3

He says "feminist unable to come up with laws", which makes it sound like he outsmarted them or something, or that they perpetrate some idea that women are discriminated by legality. It's well known that feminist thought has moved on to societal problems rather than legal problems, since they won that battle already. The fact that there is another thread where they acknowledge there is no legal discrimination means they are not "unable" because they know there isn't. I'll agree he didn't slander…
/r/MensRights14/07/13 09:46 AM
-4

Just the only way I could express it right. Anyway, He didn't need my help with credibility issues, there's a thread that ask the same question OP does, albeit more bluntly, which did get answers.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 09:39 AM
3

There's a better post three or four below this one asking the question. but worded much better. Something like "Are Women Legally Oppressed?". Op's question is slightly different with wording that less attractive to posters. Then he comes in here to slander feminist because they didn't reply to his post. It's like saying no one likes baseball because no one showed up for your game, while there is a fully fielded game on the other side of the park.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 07:06 AM
4

You posted that 3 days ago, and it's still on their front page. Not a particularly active sub to be bumping your chest about not getting replies.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 04:27 AM
-7

Probably.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 07:33 PM
-6

I do not value a guy getting his dick chopped off to be equal to child raping. I'm sorry, one's bad, but the other is just...something else.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 07:12 PM
-5

That would negate the reasoning behind a top of a list.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 07:00 PM
-6

Yes, because sex negator is worse than child rapist. Put things in perspective before you call them the worst thing ever.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:07 PM
1

Feminism? Maybe, but I think has more to do with economics. It's been a long while since you had to be aggressive to get basic necessities.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 11:40 PM
0

Didn't say that, just that a lot of the current problems can be blamed on the western colonialization, and problematic countries tend to have higher levels of crime.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 06:36 PM
0

Yes, I'm sure colonialism has nothing to do with present day Africa.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 12:45 AM
2

If you don't think fedoras are cringy, you might be wearing one.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 04:17 AM
1

Look, I already agreed that most of it's cat and mouse, just that I disagree it isn't creepy at all.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 06:11 PM
1

Yes, I'm sure my grandfather used the "Think of how bad I'd feel if you got pneumonia and died?" Even for the context of the time, that's creepy as fuck. Some lyrics can be attributed to cat and mouse, but you can't deny some of it's creepy, like "say, whats in this drink" also being a indicator.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 08:05 AM
0

I'm not sure how I feel about this comic, but don't even pretend that's the point.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 01:06 AM
2

Women can do many combat roles other than frontline. Snipers, pilots, tank drivers/commanders, etc. The soviet union during ww2 is a particularly good example.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 12:46 AM
1

Please tell me you're not one of the pro-gender roles MRAs.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 08:34 AM
1

Also, there are various sub movements in the men's rights. The Men's Rights Movement is anti-feminist, and I forgot the pro-feminist one.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:13 AM
1

What if I'm looking for someone non-traditional?
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:08 AM
1

From what I've managed to gather, this is not what I think patriarchy is. What I think the definition is, based on the countless arguments I've read through, a society where people in general believe men to be better than women. It's not an active thing, but a passive thing. Whether it still happens or not isn't the point of my post, but I think this is the best definition without counciously trying to destroy the idea.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 04:59 AM
1

I thought patriarchy(as I can best understand it) is the societal belief that men are better than women generally, not an actual placed system, just an organic one that has sprung from thousands of years of male dominance.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 11:23 AM
1

Taking a picture of someone naked while they are being disrobed(by animal or not) is also sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 07:55 AM
4

Trying to get a look at someone by forcing clothes or covers off them is sexual harassment, not an expression of sexual attraction.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 07:02 AM
1

ivy Depends on the game, but this version http://imgur.com/9t7rn29 Looks like she belongs in a bdsm video, rather than a video game.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 04:37 PM
-8

That's reaching and we both know it. I would understand her using her sexuality, but having it open at all times is not that.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 04:25 PM
2

But it fits the narrative. He's the goddamn batman, he should be able to do those things. Catwoman on the other hand is running around with a target painted on her chest for no reason other than expose boobage. I think an equal problem would be a catwoman focused game(with her doing all her damn near impossible acrobatics), and then we end up with a scene of a topless, ripped batman for no other reason than to see him topless.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 02:48 PM
1

Anything else you want to tell me about myself?
/r/MensRights28/02/13 12:57 AM
1

You also forgot to mention my bakunin, proudhon, marx, and engels reading.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:53 PM
1

And the sentence after that says most anarchist use the term as a system of governance.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:51 PM
-1

Anarchy is only defined as chaos in the US, educate yourself.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:20 AM
0

I caught this just before I went to bed, last refresh. Holy shit are flipping everything I say. . The assumption that the reduction of government would cause chaos, however, does give some insight into your mindset. More confusion, I though you were calling anarchy chaos, rather than a non-chaotic philosophy. This is why I read it as I did. Although I did mention the USSR being attacked, they managed to fight it off. I think we can agree this was also confusion, and not helpful or meaningful to …
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:17 AM
0

Find, screenshoot, and post the word chaos in my post. Otherwise, you have no point here. You mentioned chaos as a way eschew government, assumed you meant anarchy. Your previous statement was an assertion that they've all been taken out. My previous statement is that the ones that aren't dictatorial get taken out. Cuba is dictatorial, so it stands to reason it didn't fall. This is interesting, but it doesn't change the discussion. It doesn't lend support that anarchy is overwhelmingly collectiv…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 08:27 AM
-1

Do you even lift?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:52 AM
-2

You know, I've debated socialism and anarchy for a year or two now, so all your posting is well used points. Chaos Anarchy isn't chaos, only the american definition of the word, and has little to do with the philosophy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism Anarchy can have government, but not a hierarchical government. Cuba Like I said, the only ones to survive are usually dictatorships, of which Cuba is the least dictatorish one. Also, Cuba had bay of pigs, not to mention numerous assassinati…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:23 AM
1

I didn't say I particularly held it as the only explanation, or even a good one. I just said that women being viewed as lesser, which is why they don't get elected, would fit in patriarchy theory. My belief is that society holds on to gender roles as a throwback to prehistoric times, placing more responsibility and power in the males hands, and less so in females hands. I don't hold the notion that men are actively benefiting men, and actively oppressing women.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 05:11 AM
-5

Anarchist doesn't mean chaos. Communal systems have been described as the best possible system for anarchy. neither has ever been successfully implemented as the overtly acknowledged, completely active economic system of a nation without the power of a dictatorial government. There also hasn't been a socialist country that hasn't been taken out by either war, payrolling dictators, or hostile work of capitalist countries. When the USSR first revolted, 17 foreign countries sent troops to repress i…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 04:47 AM
0

Cool story bro. I didn't say I believed in the utopian finish, I'm much stronger believer in less government, more cooperation. But you know, just throw insults, it's cool.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 04:09 AM
-6

Because socialism and communism is not just a big government ideal. Think of it like capitalism, there are anarchistic capitalist ideas, capitalist moderates, and capitalist big governments. There's no specific government structure that goes to every vein of a theory, let alone one as diverse as socialism.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 04:07 AM
0

From what I understand about patriarchy, it's not a male only thing. The naming is terrible imo, but I think it's mostly a societal level belief or view that men are better than women for the most part, such as political competence. that's kinda vague, so I wouldn't source it.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 03:24 AM
-8

Yes, i'm sure you believe that if they only thing you've learned about communism is from us history class. Communism, at least the theory of it, advocates for a utopian world without a state, so yes, anarchist.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 03:23 AM
3

Maybe it's because women might be viewed as incapable/uncharismatic for the job?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:51 AM
-2

No, but anarchist(such as myself) are more than likely socialist/communist/etc and align with gender equality, which feminism supposedly also stands for.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:40 AM
1

but apparently you can't consent to anything while drunk if you're a woman, but men can apparently. I didn't say that, I hold both sexes in the same regard, that you can't consent while drunk. Holy shit, half your rant is coming off like I'm anti-man, where as I view myself as egalitarian. implying that anyone acknowledges that a woman is capable of raping a man. The law certainly doesn't recognise it. and I don't agree with that. And no. I am not potentially a rapist, nor is 'anyone' potentiall…
/r/MensRights15/02/13 12:56 AM
1

I disagree with their wording "all men", because all people are potential rapist. Just like all people potentially a murderers. Doesn't mean it's likely to happen, but it can. Shit you better not go out, have a few drinks and have sex with a girl, because All I really hear is "I know the girl(or hell, maybe even me) can't consent, by why the fuck can't I bang her anyway?" Rape is sex based on the lack of consent, and you can't give consent drunk. AFAIK you can't sign legal documents drunk. So al…
/r/MensRights14/02/13 10:34 PM
1

It's funny, you say I didn't read what you posted, yet you misunderstood my meaning. I didn't say we lived in a democracy. I said the problem is a large pool of people voting for a large pool of people. Break the pool down to groups of about 1000, and have them vote on things that affect them, rather than 300 million voting on matters that affect 300 million. What's so bad about asking for people with the ability to vote to actually think of society as a whole first ? Because many people have di…
/r/MensRights14/02/13 05:51 AM
1

But the batshit insane 'men are all violent rapists' 'lets cull males down to 10% of the population' types that seem to constitute the core of the movement are a very big problem Oh bullshit. That's like saying Anti-feminist, bigoted "Get in the kitchen" MRA's are the core, or that the core of Libertarianism is just people who want to shoot others in the face for walking across their property.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 01:30 AM
0

You know , it's funny you mention this because the more I think about it , the more I think it's really not a bad idea. That's stupid. "You're going to be under the governance of this country whether you like it or not, and if you don't give up a portion of life in service to the country, you don't get a say!" Nor do we have any real say in what any government does. Maybe you're problem isn't with democracy, just large governments. Large governments and democracy are close to incompatible. I hig…
/r/MensRights14/02/13 01:26 AM
4

Silencing dissenting opinions is one of the main tactics used by (Insert group here)
/r/MensRights14/02/13 01:19 AM
-4

Who would've guessed a political ideology that is completely dependent on all people being treated equally would share history with a movement for equality!
/r/MensRights05/02/13 07:44 AM
3

Yes. Men were biologically stronger, so when war did happen, it made sense to send them to war. I think it was because they were stronger was the main reason, rather than being disposable. Although I will admit being seen as disposable is probably also a contributing factor.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 08:35 PM
3

You're an idiot if you think that. You have to carry a lot of stuff, while heavy, just to go on patrol. You have to be able to carry your buddy out of an area. There are reasons why being fit and strong are emphasized so much in the military.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 07:46 PM
6

If you want to debate about how things would be based on biology alone, you would be right. But war is a cultural thing, so we must speak of it in a cultural perspective.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 07:43 PM
5

The males of species are usually stronger, it's not just a human phenomena.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 07:42 PM
3

Or, you know, the fact men are generally stronger, and you don't win wars without strength.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 08:17 AM
0

is the car thief the only one "to blame" for my car being stolen? Yes. You can be blamed for being stupid and doing all that other stuff, but the act of theft is all the thiefs fault. she should probably take those steps. I agree, but no matter what, she can not be blamed for the actual crime being committed.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 07:49 PM
1

Yes, it can. But I find it more disgusting when people blame the victim for everything, rather than what was just the victims fault.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 03:40 AM
7

I agree.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 03:15 AM
2

That's a fine position that you have, as long as ultimately you blame the rape on the rapist. I've seen people do the opposite, and it gets ugly.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 02:50 AM
1

A car can't say no, it isn't right. The (non-drunk)person can, and should.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 11:23 AM
1

Sexual assault and rape are not the same thing. Anyway, yes, sexual assault such as groping is a crime, unless you consented. And yes, sleeping with drunk people is rape. Having sex when only when one party can't/doesn't consent is rape. When one party can't consent, and does something to someone who doesn't consent regardless of ability(such as you, or a car) they are ultimately responsible. On the other hand, When one party can't consent, and the other can, by consenting and taking advantage, …
/r/MensRights20/01/13 11:22 AM
1

Obviously. There needs to be more diverse posters, but these are not bad, just not done far enough.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 02:52 AM
1

The purpose is to educate people who don't know what rape exactly is. Some people don't know that having sex with a drunk person is rape. This isn't to prevent rape for the rapist who want to rape, just the ones who unknowingly or ignorantly will.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 11:01 PM
1

Here's how this is going to go down I provide a source of some kind, you'll either call it feminist propaganda, revisionist history, or how men were also persecuted at the time. But for the sake of arguments: http://ancientstandard.com/2011/02/23/the-role-of-concubines-in-the-ancient-world/ Here's a quote on wikipedia's page for sexual objectification: The objection to the objectification of women is not a recent phenomenon. In the French Enlightenment, for example, there was a debate as to whet…
/r/MensRights19/01/13 10:34 AM
0

What they don't realize is that feminism caused it; women being sexually liberated meant screwing guys and being promiscuous to the point where they are viewed as sex objects. I'm reading through this, but this point is retarded. Women have been treated as sex objects for far longer than feminism has been around.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 01:09 AM
2

Then at least add a sarcasm mark then.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:18 AM
3

No, shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 12:56 AM
1

Is it specifically the women, or lawyers that tell them they can do so.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 06:13 AM
8

It's on /r/feminism too
/r/MensRights10/01/13 02:55 AM
1

Technically, but pinko is suppose to derogatory, so fuck him.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 06:20 AM
1

Probably because many believe people aren't below them.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 01:52 AM
3

The hell you smoking? I'm not talking equality of outcomes, which is a biologically impossibility, I'm talking in opportunity and laws, which are not biologically impossibilities.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 01:08 AM
0

Not a pinko, a full on socialist, dumbass.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 01:04 AM
5

Impossible or not, it's worth working for.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 10:15 PM
2

The new adventures of old christine?
/r/MensRights06/01/13 11:34 AM
1

Every revolutionary theory does. Hell, we've had republics for over 2000 years, are we are still trying to figure those out.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 11:18 AM
6

beautiful, graceful, feminine competent, strong, powerful None of these things contradict.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 11:11 AM
12

Yeah, that girl looks like she can barely stand, let alone make a proper decision.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 12:12 AM
1

Anarchy under a left-wing system is impossible because it requires an order to force "equality." Anarchy is not lawlessness, so yeah. And how is capitalism bottom up? Bottom up in the sense that the people who can only sell their labor to survive prop up those on top? I don't know if you can say the democrats necessarily want a more socially free society, considering leftists generally dislike certain forms of speach. Yeah, I know, more bias, but I'm going to expect a democrat to ban hate speech…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 05:29 AM
1

They're all nutty and the true believers are scum. Totally unbiased. but left-libertarianism exists though it is really liberalism Actually it's more akin to anarchy. the right/conservatism values order and purpose in life, the left values novelty and ideology over reality Even more bias. There is a left/divide, and there are several kinds. The mainstream divide is obvious, republicans and democrats. Democrats being more leaning towards a freer society, but a less free economy. Republicans leani…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 04:54 AM
4

Isn't eugenics were people try to steer human genes by getting rid of the undesirables, rather than say some poor family realizing they won't be able to take care of a child and get an abortion instead?
/r/MensRights13/12/12 03:14 PM
1

Ensuring equality of outcome necessarily requires oppression. You seem to think I want everyone to be a machine. I want equal opportunity, not outcome. I want people to succeed or fail based on their own character, rather than the situation they were born in. Free market capitalism does not have the "purpose" of making a profit. Sure it is, there is very little purpose to operate a business other than for the purpose of making money, unless you have a dream that you wish to see fulfilled. Dreams…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 03:43 PM
1

You're deliberately misinterpreting what I said. I said that the only way out of grinding poverty has been the free market system - that is, it is the only system that has ever allowed any society to move towards a comfortable existence for the majority of its citizens. All other systems, including socialism, keep the masses in permanent poverty. And you refuse to understand that capitalism cannot stand without making some sort of underclass. I can agree that free market systems(voluntary) allow…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 02:45 PM
1

A system that relies of grinding poverty is the only way out? Bullshit, maybe for some, but not the majority. Seriously, the 20th century is a testament to the fact that socialism doesn't work. and the 18th, 19th, and 20th is a testament that capitalism can't go on without holding a lot of people down. It took 120 million lives to prove it doesn't and you want to try again? It's you're talking about the authoritarian regimes, fuck no, that's why I'm a libertarian socialist. Also, how many have d…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 12:46 PM
1

The most basic way to put it is, they are against any hierarchical state, unlike democracy where everyone's vote is the same. Obviously it doesn't need to completely democratic for everything, as people can agree with certain laws, such as no murder.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 12:32 PM
1

The most basic way to put it is, they are against any hierarchical state, unlike democracy where everyone's vote is the same. Obviously it doesn't need to completely democratic for everything, as people can agree with certain laws, such as no murder.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 12:32 PM
1

Seriously? You know how many times I get the "Socialism is only big government" argument? A socialist country doesn't have to be planned, there are many unplanned flavors of socialism, such as anarchism, mutualism, trade unionism, and syndicalism. There can also be planned types of socialism, much like there are planned types of capitalism. Now, are you going to rationalize that I'm not only wrong and don't know what I'm talking about, or are you going to accept that are as many different kinds …
/r/MensRights12/12/12 12:26 PM
1

yes, but are you going to treat them like they are a lesser being? There is a difference between that, and just being annoyed or looking down at their behavior.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 01:34 PM
1

Fair enough, but isn't more the message the words are literally giving, rather than the messages people interpret from how people dress?
/r/MensRights11/12/12 07:53 AM
1

At what? Telling people they can't be in favor of socialism without also wanting overarching and invasive government? I'm of the belief that socialist country could be as authoritarian or libertarian as any capitalist country could be.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 10:59 PM
1

Just like the original quote, I turned it around for a quick laugh for myself.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:11 PM
2

Are they? I'd say there is a marked difference in the end for a person that switches partners a lot, opposed to a 4-person relationship.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:10 PM
–

Not possible. Cool story, bro.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:09 PM
3

Libertarian socialist. Anyway, libertarians was for anarchist left wingers back when the term started, so if anything, it'd be a reclamation.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 07:07 PM
2

There is a difference between polyamory, and just switching around a lot.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:15 PM
5

Unless they start to engage in polyamory.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:21 PM
3

Does it? I'm more of a libertarian/anarchist variant of socialist, so it's quite a bit different from the big states like the USSR were. We live in a world from were the moment we are born, we have to have future prospects "Maybe he'll be a doctor, or a lawyer!". we go through a school system and culture telling us being rich is being happy. But if you're not smart, confident, lucky, or fortunate, you'll end up being depressed and stressed for life. Right now I'm advocating thing like worker co-…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:06 PM
0

All I've seen you do in this thread is parade your AnCap ideology and call socialist crazy, violent, and evil
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:00 PM
5

I'm a socialist because I do no believe we are free men in the world we currently live in.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:55 PM
12

Funnily enough, that's what we tell the capitalist. But to each their own perspective.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:50 PM
1

You saw earlier where I said people should determine between themselves as what they see acceptable.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 05:13 AM
0

How bout not considering everyone is the devil incarnate? or that every relationship is not thunderdome.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 04:33 AM
1

Most likely two adults who know how to communicate with each other.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 04:05 AM
3

That why I tend not to mention my views here.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 12:51 PM
0

So? Nothing wrong with being a hooker.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 06:57 AM
1

I fail to see how people dress is grounds to judge them as something lesser.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 05:59 PM
1

Why do you think that? Porn has been around forever, and it's not like relationships are as far down, just marriage.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 07:24 AM
1

I'd much rather have a life partner set up, where either one of us can leave at any time.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 10:28 PM
4

probably not, but a thong on a female and a bulging crotch on a male are. have you seen the latest superman, wolverine, nightwing, etc? i'd have to shove two tube socks down my pants to achieve the same effect. Those would've been perfect examples! and wonder woman looks badass in the redesign.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 01:30 AM
3

you mean the latest revision of WW's costume that has her wearing pants and a jacket? Really? I didn't know that. i don't really care about magnitude, it doesn't change anything. when people want to talk about magnitudes they just want to play oppression olympics. my point is to highlight that both genders are objectified and have their attributes highlighted, not women only. I agree that both sides are objectified, I just think magnitudes are important because a sleeveless piece of armor and a …
/r/MensRights07/11/12 11:24 PM
2

No, but showing off your arms(which was common during the classical era) while in the same vein, it not even close to the extremes women costumes go to. I would say the black widow is a good example of the women version of thors costume. It's practical while showing off physical qualities of their bodies(thor's arms, widow's ass), unlike the majority which is like wonder womans, which is just barely practical and focuses completely on sexual characteristics. But if you are saying men can be subj…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 10:46 PM
3

How does this one not highlight physical attributes? Look at those guns. Honestly, this is a shit comparison to this
/r/MensRights07/11/12 10:34 PM
7

Do we speak out against our radicals as much either?
/r/MensRights01/11/12 09:51 AM
3

I have no plans on walking through the projects in business formal, a briefcase, and a shiny watch.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 11:07 PM
2

Agreed. I don't even understand how he got that conservative means they don't want the government holding their hand. Reminds me of the term twisting where communist equals a person who wants government control of everything.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 01:07 AM
5

Conservative means wanting things to be the same. It is why back during the French and Russians revolutions, the conservatives were monarchist. If anything, what you said would be libertarian feminism(if such a thing exist? i don't know all the sub-movements).
/r/MensRights19/07/12 04:16 PM
8

do the world a favor and kill yourself Dude, wtf?
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:53 AM
3

4chan There's your problem.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 12:37 AM
4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSQEdBmMlEg
/r/MensRights28/05/12 04:10 AM
1

My mom is libertarian, so no.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 11:52 PM
1

It can go either way. They are brave for going to war, or cowards for not standing up to their nation going into an war that America shouldn't of worried about?
/r/MensRights13/05/12 03:51 AM
2

Isn't the feather a sign of bravery here in the US?
/r/MensRights13/05/12 02:55 AM
5

Yeah, but there is meaning behind it that is non-sexual.Much like art of naked people can be non-sexual, pictures of your child naked in the tun don't need to be classified as child porn.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 04:55 AM
1

"nice"
/r/MensRights07/05/12 02:23 AM
3

i'd have an easier time agreeing with this if society wasn't so strongly pushing the cougar/younger stud concept. either significant age gaps are acceptable for everyone, or they're not for everyone. Those are mostly flings, and I do not have problems with that swinging either way. If some guy starts sleeping with his dad's ex-wife and there's a 30 year gap, that is just as creepy as a step daughter and stepfather.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 12:06 AM
8

I stick with my mistakes, no matter how regretful.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 02:24 AM
–

I was joking, but in bad taste.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 09:53 PM
–

With a body like that, I'll allow it.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 09:38 PM
1

I doubt that, I'd suppose it'd more likely be "The guy is gay, or not a real man"
/r/MensRights25/04/12 12:20 AM
1

True, men can use sex as a manipulator just as much as women, unless they somehow feel the women has the advantage...
/r/MensRights24/04/12 11:54 PM
3

Scanning: Problem seems to be she is flat out insane, not a woman.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 11:16 PM
1

so, are we talking about the boats with women and children, or jack helping rose live?
/r/MensRights15/04/12 05:46 PM
-4

With a strap-on?
/r/MensRights12/04/12 11:56 PM
1

I think the word you are looking for is "Equalist"
/r/MensRights12/04/12 12:06 AM
1

Idk about that last part. I'm still trying to find fault in Detereminism
/r/MensRights01/04/12 08:40 AM
45

No, I wasn't going to say anything like that. It's liken saying tag is a subconscious look at hunting. What I'm trying to say is that games can explore themes, and have their own merits as well. Games like Bioshock explore themes, and are fun to play. Games like Portal are fun to play and can get you thinking differently. Games like Metro 2033 can be mindlessly violent(never mind that it is based on a book), but also can be enjoyed by having different styles of fighting(stealth, run and gun, etc…
/r/MensRights28/03/12 01:27 AM
–

Oh let me guess! Angry Birds is an intimate examination of man's fascination to fly and his innate, human curiosity to explore the heavens? Go check out Bioshock, Portal, Metro 2033, Half-life, KOTOR, or really any game worth it's salt and tell me it's a worse use of time than a book, a movie, the internet
/r/MensRights28/03/12 01:10 AM
4

Marriage is a silly thing.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 11:09 PM
-2

I usually agree with mens rights, but this thread is just "Why won't a man buy me chocolates?" sadface.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 10:29 PM
0

That would just help them in the long run after they end up drunk, impaired motor skills and all that jazz.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 10:34 PM
1

I'm not entirely sure how people would feel about women prison rape. They probably wouldn't take it as seriously as rape in rest of the world. I vaguely remember there being a movie with female prison rape, but i'm not entirely sure.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 04:06 AM
13

What do you mean seriously? The first one is a social stigma. I've seen women heckled for not having their last names completely changed.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 03:54 AM
2

Why is this being downvoted? He's not saying equality is impossible, just that it is so much a part of our history and genetics, correcting it will take more than a flip of a switch.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 01:54 AM
3

Women do not have a "higher reproductive value" In purely biological terms, they do. They have the children, and can only have a max of like what, 20-30 at best? A man could sire that many children in a year easily if he has enough women to go around. This isn't some post saying "women are better, you're just an asshole," I'm saying there are deeply ingrained biological responses people make without them realizing it, and this effects society today.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 01:52 AM
1

I don't plan to marry. I plan to have a life-partner(if that works out). That way we are not legally bound to each other, and if either of us wants out we are completely free to do so.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 05:11 AM
3

You can also draw correlations between the fall of empires and wars. But yeah, feminism is more likely the cause. /s
/r/MensRights11/02/12 10:57 PM
10

Egalitarian? What are you, some sort of commie? /s
/r/MensRights04/02/12 05:38 PM
1

I'd say there are more fundamental differences between male and female than skin color.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 01:48 AM
1

What he described was human behavior, not exclusive to feminist. Other than that, all I got from your post is feminist = anti-male. Really, you think you are making a good post, but really, it is the shit people point at MensRights and say, "Look at these assholes."
/r/MensRights10/01/12 03:21 AM
–

are you trying to justify "she's asking for it"? If people want to prance around like this, what does that have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights04/01/12 02:47 AM
–

I'm not actually paying a lot of attention to this article I posted. It looks like predictable feminist ideology, so I used the title for a casual potshot following what's in this excellent article linked here:[1] Media focus on rapes and other female miseries while ignoring male executions, worked-to-death laborers, tortured prisoners, and nine-year-old boy soldiers trained to kill and be killed. How many movies have their been of men being dying in war, yet still show women being raped and add…
/r/MensRights04/01/12 02:04 AM
2

People like that whole domination thing.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 01:45 AM
-6

Because men/women do stare? Make/find one for your boxers if you feel you need one.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 01:37 AM
1

Is there not also men only floors?
/r/MensRights28/12/11 04:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter